http://www.antiwar.com/malic/pf/p-m030801.html

              ANTIWAR, Thursday, March 8, 2001

              Balkan Express
              by Nebojsa Malic
              Antiwar.com

              The Fourth Balkan War

              On Tuesday night it seemed as if the Albanian militants
who invaded the
              Macedonian border village of Tanusevci [Tanushevtsy] were
retreating,
              unhindered, into Kosovo after Monday's pitched battle with
Macedonian
              forces. Despite the fierce fighting, government forces did
not manage to
              dislodge the militants, who were well-armed, even better
positioned, and
              protected by minefields. Three Macedonian soldiers were
killed during
              the operation - two hit landmines and bled to death, as
Albanians shot
              at KFOR helicopters that tried to evacuate them, while one
was killed by
              sniper fire. Parallel to NATO's statements that the
militants were
              supposedly retreating, the government in Skopje said the
insurgency was
              far from over. The army detected traces of militants that
suggested
              other villages in the area might have been affected. Prior
experience
              indicates that this is not the last Macedonians have seen
of the
              "National Liberation Army," or the last attempt of
militant Albanians to
              carve out their desired Balkan empire.

              ONE, TWO, THREE

              Early in the 20th century, the continued Ottoman
occupation of Balkan
              lands was of great concern to those nations that spent the
prior century
              struggling for their freedom. In 1912, they formed a
coalition and
              attacked the Turks in what became known as the First
Balkan War, driving
              them almost all the way back to the Bosporus before
Austria-Hungary
              intervened to stop the Turkish defeat. The great powers
then dictated
              the terms of peace, creating Albania as a state and
limiting the
              territorial gains of Serbia and Greece. Bulgaria, unhappy
with its share
              of the spoils, attacked Serbia in 1913. Other allies
joined Serbia and
              defeated Bulgaria in the Second Balkan War, which gave the
Turks a
              chance to recapture some territory and cut Bulgaria off
from the Aegean.
              Events of the 1990s could justifiably be called the Third
Balkan War -
              as events from 1991 to 1995 represented a continuum that
ended with the
              Dayton Agreement, once again a solution forced upon the
combatants by
              the world powers. Given that the fighting in Kosovo, which
started in
              1998, stopped only under a temporary armistice between
NATO and
              Yugoslavia in June 1999, we might as well face the stark
reality that we
              are in the middle of the Fourth Balkan War. The stakes are
as high this
              time as they were ninety years ago, or ten years ago, and
the
              bloodletting may have just begun.

              CAUSES OF WAR

              At the heart of this Fourth War is the Albanian drive for
separation,
              not only from Serbia but from Macedonia, Greece and even
Montenegro.
              Whether this separation serves the purpose of a "Greater
Albania," or a
              "Greater Kosovo" seems immaterial. The program of Greater
Albania is,
              after all, advocated by Kosovo Albanians more than any
others, and the
              future capital of this "country" is supposed to be in
Pristina, not
              Tirana. Albania proper may be on the periphery of events
right now, and
              could even express public criticism in order to deflect
bad press, but
              there is little doubt it would join a Greater Kosovo if
that monstrous
              creation ever came into being.

              PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOR

              From what little is known of them, it seems the Albanian
militants in
              Macedonia have the same modus operandi as those in
southern Serbia, even
              the KLA in Kosovo. It seizes and holds a village or
multiple villages,
              provoking an armed response. At the same time, it rants
and raves to the
              international press about the horrible "repression"
Albanians are
              subjected to. Once attacked by government forces, the
insurgents fight
              hard, then withdraw, taking or ordering many civilians
along. These
              "refugees" are then used to bolster the militants' claim
of "genocide"
              now pursued by the government that have until then merely
"repressed"
              them. Of course, the militants declare their absolute
commitment to a
              peaceful solution, which invariably entails the de facto
separation of
              the territories they claim, and its placement under
international
              protectorate or armed occupation. This "peace process"
should be
              "mediated" by an external broker, preferably NATO or the
US. This was
              the case at Rambouillet in early 1999, and the Albanians
claiming
              Presevo valley in southern Serbia are demanding it be the
case again. If
              the pattern holds, Albanians from Macedonia are likely to
make a similar
              demand in a month or so. All along, however, these
militants will refuse
              to disarm, retreat or disband, claiming their existence is
necessary to
              "protect and defend" their people. They are, of course,
open to the
              possibility of "demilitarization" by submitting to NATO
command and
              getting on the payroll, as the "reformed" KLA did by
transforming into
              the KPC.

              EASY PICKINGS

              Another mark of Albanian militants is that their attacks
usually follow
              the path of least resistance. If fought decisively they
will retreat and
              regroup, but never quit. At this point, Macedonia and
Yugoslavia are
              both theoretically strong enough to deal with the
militants. However,
              they are hobbled by NATO's insistence on restraint and, in
come cases,
              indirect support for the militants. In Yugoslavia's case,
the lingering
              effect of the conflict with Kosovo militants has left a
bad taste in
              Belgrade's mouth - not to mention depleted uranium marks -
and seriously
              undermined the new government's will to fight. Barred from
resolving the
              issue themselves, they demand of NATO to intervene on
their behalf. The
              logic of this is most peculiar, especially in the case of
Yugoslavia,
              officially still the enemy of NATO in Kosovo. For if
Yugoslavia were not
              considered an enemy, there would be no need for KFOR's
continued
              occupation.

              Both Macedonia and Yugoslavia have other problems, which
further weakens
              their capability for self-defense. Macedonia has to find a
way to act
              without alienating a large Albanian population, whose
representatives
              are part of the ruling coalition government. The issue of
its official
              name and southern border, which was about to be resolved
with Greece,
              was postponed due to the Albanian attack, and represents a
permanent
              strategic liability.

              Yugoslavia also has to deal with a potentially fatal issue
of
              Montenegrin secessionism, running more rampant as the
country weakens.
              The cobbled-together government of Serbia is very
politically unstable
              and often contradicting itself. As if that weren't enough,
the US-funded
              War Crimes Tribunal continues to blackmail and pressure
Belgrade on the
              issue of its former leaders, indicted for alleged (and yet
unproven) war
              crimes as a boost to NATO's position during the 1999 war.
This
              relentless pressure also magnifies the scope of new
Albanian claims of
              "repression and genocide," propaganda which defies
countermeasures in a
              US/NATO-dominated media world. Even Macedonia has to be
sensitive to
              these accusations, because Balkans mud does not come off
easily.

              LOCAL INTEREST

              The surrounding countries are also interested in the
progress and
              outcome of the conflict. In the west, Croatia hopes the
region would
              calm down but also secretly hopes Serbia would be further
weakened and
              eliminated as a rival. Croat and Muslim ethnic interests
in Bosnia are
              also watching, hoping that Serbia's defeat could open the
possibility of
              "revising" the Dayton treaty by taking out the Serbs
within Bosnia's
              boundaries. In the most moderate scenario, the Serbs would
be
              assimilated into a unitary state. In some less amicable
plans, they
              would meet the fate of Croatian Serbs at the end of the
Third War.

              In the north, there is a growing possibility that Serbia's
province of
              Vojvodina might split off if Albanians have their way. A
sizable
              Hungarian population there could likely advocate
annexation by Hungary.
              Bulgaria could also hope to increase its territory, by
marching into
              what's left of Macedonia after the Albanians are done.
Some fear that
              Bulgaria's offer to send troops to help fight the
Albanians might be the
              first act of just such a move. Moreover, a week ago
Bulgaria's president
              signed a treaty with NATO giving its troops free access to
all of
              Bulgaria.

              Greece has plenty of reasons to worry, as Albanian
aspirations include
              some of its territory as well. If Albanians are allowed to
expand and
              grow stronger, it may be just a matter of time before
Greece is "asked"
              by its NATO allies to relinquish the so-called "Chameria"
region, "in
              the interest of regional stability," of course.

              THE GREAT POWERS

              A common thing to all four Balkan Wars has been the
presence of a
              "shadow participant" - the great power(s). In the First
and Second, the
              strongest force was Austria-Hungary, backed by Germany. In
the Third and
              Fourth, without a doubt, that force is the United States,
through NATO.

              Why? United States' motivation is an area that deserves a
column - and
              volumes of books - in its own right. But it is more than
anything else,
              "realist". It seeks the greatest tangible gains at the
lowest cost.
              American involvement in Bosnia, according to Ambassador
Richard
              Holbrooke, reasserted US leadership in Europe. This
purpose was again
              served in Kosovo, when the US dragooned its European
allies into
              launching a war against Yugoslavia in violation of the
entire body of
              international law. Even though the war barely achieved its
publicized
              objectives, it was far more successful at revamping NATO
as the tool of
              US domination in Europe and elevating it above the UN as
the supreme
              arbiter of conflicts in the "Atlantic" sphere of
influence, wherever it
              might reach.

              Some politicians in Yugoslavia and Macedonia live under
the illusion
              that NATO fought the Kosovo war in the name of democracy,
human rights
              and international law. This assumption has tremendous
potential to prove
              fatal to both countries. The US (and hence NATO) could
care less about
              the first two, save to use them as propaganda slogans,
while they
              brazenly violated the third. If power is America's
foremost goal, why
              would it possibly risk aiding the powerless FRY and
Macedonia at the
              expense of Albanian militants its special forces and
contractors had
              trained and equipped, and on whose behalf its bombers went
to war?

              Last, but not least, the United States and its allies
enjoy domination
              in the media theater, thanks to which they can
effortlessly manipulate
              propaganda and perceptions in favor of their allies. Thus
a Reuters
              reporter can write an absolutely irrational statement that
NATO is
              "worried the gunmen, emboldened by the success or an armed
struggle in
              Kosovo, might extend it to Macedonia" (Reuters, March 6),
while leaving
              out that the "gunmen" owe the success of their "armed
struggle in
              Kosovo" squarely to the Alliance's bombing spree against
everything that
              moved in Serbia, so that NATO's concern stems from either
idiocy or
              hypocrisy.

              WORDS AND DEEDS

              Manipulation of facts is a tremendously understated
weapon. Hypocrisy is
              another. The US is officially striving for stability in
the region. And
              indeed, it might be. A Greater Albania and an expanded
Bulgaria, both in
              America's fold and leaning on Turkey as a staunch US ally,
would ensure
              US domination over southern Europe for decades, and enable
the Empire to
              push into central Asia, towards the vast oil and gas
fields of the
              former Soviet Union. As for the public US commitment to
the integrity of
              borders, the same policy espoused by the Bush I
administration never
              stopped Ambassador Warren Zimmerman from doing his best to
encourage the
              destruction of Yugoslavia by 1992. As Zimmerman himself
said to a
              Croatian magazine in 1992, "nothing is forever." Respect
for borders and
              sovereignty would imply respect for international law,
which the US and
              NATO got to be immune from since their 1999 bombing war.
Hoping that the
              Empire would actually favor ideological ends - protecting
democracies,
              for example - over practical gains is, to put it mildly,
irrational.
              Freed from any moral responsibility, the Empire would
sacrifice anyone
              and anything - especially the people it has demonized for
so long - if
              the result of that sacrifice was more power and more
money.

              Hence, if the US could interfere in the Third Balkan War
to assert its
              domination over Europe and help start the Fourth to cement
this
              leadership, what makes anyone think it would abandon that
objective, or
              the war that leads to it, midway through the fighting? Two
years after
              the armistice, under a new leadership anxious to prove
itself in battle,
              it might be time again to show the increasingly uppity
European vassals
              who the real rulers of the known world are, and if the
Balkans is
              secured in the process, why that would be splendid.

              Just splendid.
 
---

Questa lista e' provvisoriamente curata da componenti
dell'ex Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'",
oggi "Comitato Promotore dell'Assemblea Antimperialista".

I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono questa struttura, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.domeus.it/circles/jugoinfo
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ti piace leggere?
Cosa preferisci?
I classici, gli erotici, le favole, la magia...?
Scopri le 5 straordinarie offerte: + del 50% di sconto!
da eCircle e Gullivertown
http://www.domeus.it/ad1174754/216.74.87.165

In caso di disponibilita' si prega di prendere contatto IMMEDIATAMENTE
con
gli indirizzi sotto specificati poiche' un convoglio partira'
dall'Italia
tra pochissimi giorni.

---

APPELLO A TUTTE LE PERSONE DI BUONA VOLONTA
TIMOTIJEVIC MLADEN (25 ANNI), FIGLIO DI LAVORATORE DELLA ZASTAVA-
KRAGUJEVAC-JUGOSLAVIA E AMMALATO DI LYMPHOME NON HODGKIN
LYMPHOBLASTICUM.
AIUTATECI A SALVARGLI LA VITA !!!
ABBIAMO BISOGNO DELLE SEGUENTI MEDICINE:
-NOVANTRON(MITOKSANTRON) A 10MG N VI (DEX)
-NEUPOGEN (FILGRASTIM)480 UG FLAC ORIG N V
-CYTOSAR(ARA C ) A 500 MG NO X DECEM
-L ASPARAGINASA 100000 U FLAC N VI(SEX)
-ADRIABLASTIN A 50 MG N V(QUINQ USE)
-METOTREXAT A 1 GR N X DECEM
-LEUKOVORIN (CA FOLINAT) A 50 MG N XL(QUADRIGINTA)

PER ULTERIORI CONTATTI - RAJKA VELJOVIC -TEL.00381 034 335 762 -FAX, TEL
034 335 367- E-MAIL sindikat@...
GRAZIE, FRATERNI SALUTI

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ti piace leggere?
Cosa preferisci?
I classici, gli erotici, le favole, la magia...?
Scopri le 5 straordinarie offerte: + del 50% di sconto!
da eCircle e Gullivertown
http://www.domeus.it/ad1170067/216.74.87.165

CHE DIFFERENZA PASSA TRA GLI ESTREMISTI PAN-ALBANESI ED I TALIBAN?


Entrambi i movimenti sono stati appoggiati dagli USA. Gli estremisti
pan-albanesi si giovano dei volontari mujaheddin, i Taliban proteggono
Bin Laden. Entrambi sono largamente finanziati dai sauditi. Entrambi
distruggono il patrimonio culturale del loro paese: contro le statue del
Buddha in Afghanistan, contro i monasteri ortodossi in Kosmet.

DELIBERATE DESTRUCTION OF SERBIAN SHRINES IN KOSOVOMETOHIJA

NEW YORK, March 5 (Tanjug) Ethnic Albanian extremists continue
to
demolish Serbian shrines in KosovoMetohija, art historian Marina
BelovicHodge said at a lecture in St.Sava Othodox Church in New York.
According to her, out of 1300 important Serbian monuments in
KosovoMetohija
at least 100 have been completely demolished, while a great number have
been seriously damaged.
Marina BelovicHodge, a scholar from the National Gallery of the
United States, said that the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia seriously
damaged
the architecture and frescoes of Serbian churches, including Gracanica
monastery. The detonations ruined the walls of churches and monasteries
causing frescoes to separate from wall bases and gradually crumble to
pieces. If these frescoes, some of them dating as far back as the 13th
century, are not conserved on time, they will be lost forever, she said.
After the NATO bombing, a wave of unprecedented vandalism has
been
raging in the region. Ethnic Albaninan extremists are deliberately
demolishing all priceless Serbian shrines.
It is regrettable that UNESCO refuses to cooperate in
protecting
Srbian shrines in KosovoMetohija even after Yugoslav and U.S. experts
urged
it to help.

---

Questa lista e' provvisoriamente curata da componenti
dell'ex Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'",
oggi "Comitato Promotore dell'Assemblea Antimperialista".

I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono questa struttura, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ti piace leggere?
Cosa preferisci?
I classici, gli erotici, le favole, la magia...?
Scopri le 5 straordinarie offerte: + del 50% di sconto!
da eCircle e Gullivertown
http://www.domeus.it/ad1170120/216.74.87.165

Mrs. Jela Jovanovic wrote:
>
> The Committee for National Solidarity
> Tolstojeva 34, Belgrade, YU
>
>
> Is it Time for Bush to Apologize for America's Arming of the Taliban
> and KLA?
>
> Why the Sudden Concern Over the Destruction of Religious Statues?
>
> By: Mary Mostert, Analyst, Banner of Liberty (bannerofliberty.com)
>
> March 2, 2001
>
> ``All officials, including the ministry of vice and virtue,
> have been given the go-ahead to destroy the statues,'' the
> Taliban's Information Minister Qadratullah Jamal said
> Thursday. ``The destruction work will be done by any means
> available to them.''
>
> ``All the statues all over the country will be destroyed,''
> he said.
>
> The statues mentioned in the article are statues of Buddha. One of
> them is 175 feet tall and one is 120 feet tall and they date back to
> the 3rd and 5th century AD. UNESCO Director General Koichiro Matsuura
> said of the planned destruction,
>
> ``In Afghanistan, they are destroying statues that the entire world
> considers to be masterpieces,'' UNESCO Director-General Koichiro
> Matsuura said. ``This iconoclastic determination shocks me.''
>
> Considering what we have seen in Kosovo from the Kosovo Liberation
> Army fundamentalist Muslims, who also were armed and supported by the
> United States, the European Union, NAT O and the United Nations along
> this line, why would Matsuura be shocked when the Taliban follows the
> KLA's lead?
>
> The Western press has largely ignored the desecration and destruction
> of Serbian Christian Churches in Kosovo by the KLA. So, the front page
> reports in the Washington Post and New York Times of the Taliban's
> desecration and destruction of Buddhist religious statues is a most
> welcome surprise.
>
> The KLA and the Taliban have a lot in common. Both are armed
> fundamentalist Muslim fanatics determined to destroy the people and
> the symbols of other religions and both were initially armed and
> trained by the United States. Both groups were called "freedom
> fighters" by the West and the weapons they are using to kill, main
> religious people and destroy religious artifacts are mostly those they
> have gotten from the United States..
>
> When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan to give aid to the Communist
> government, the United States provided Stinger missiles to the
> "freedom fighters" and taught them how to shoot down Soviet aircraft.
> By 1999 left over Stinger missiles were being deployed to hijack an
> Indian Airbus as the Taliban demanded release of some of its
> terrorists.
>
> The Taliban's supreme leader, Mullah Mohammed Omar, dismissed the
> West's concerns by saying:
>
> "We do not understand why everybody is so worried. All we
> are breaking are stones." A mullah is honored in the Muslim
> faith as one who is learned in the shari'a, the sacred law
> of Muslims.
>
> At least the Muslims in Afghanistan are being honest about
> what they are doing by openly admitting why they are
> killing, maiming and destroying all that stands in their way
> of a purely Muslim state. In Kosovo over 100 Christian
> churches and monasteries, some dating back to the 13th and
> 14th century, have been destroyed by the KLA terrorists we
> helped arm.
>
> However, in both situations, the Western media has shown
> literally no concern for the suffering of the people
> involved, much less the threat to religious treasures. In
> Afghanistan, a once stable nation of 15 million people has
> been literally destroyed with little mention in the West
> that six million of its population were driven out as
> refugees.
>
> Cosma Shalizi in his review of "The Soviet Invasion and the
> Afghan Response, 1979-1982" (University of California Press,
> 1995), by M. Hassan Kakar,
> (http://www.santafe.edu/~shalizi/reviews/kakar-soviet-invasion/)
> notes:
>
> "The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in December
> 1979. It was the last hot war it would fight, and
> one whose failure played a leading role in its
> loss of the Cold War and disintegration.
> Afghanistan is infamous today for being in the
> grip of the most benighted, fanatical and
> misogynist government in the world. It was not
> always that way, but has become so through the
> superpowers' acts of omission and commission ---
> mostly commission. ...
>
> "Here we come to the sowing of the dragon's teeth.
> US aid to the mujahideen went through the CIA. The
> CIA passed it on to its counterpart in Pakistan,
> the ISI (which doubles as the Pakistani secret
> police). The ISI passed it on to the political
> parties of exiles in Peshawr, from whom, in turn,
> it finally made its way, often much-reduced, to
> commanders inside Afghanistan. The ISI, as a
> matter of deliberate policy, favored the most
> extreme Islamist organizations it could lay hands
> on, plus ethnic separatists --- not because it
> thought these groups could form a stable
> government in Afghanistan, but precisely because
> it hoped they could not. (Recall that the frontier
> with Afghanistan, including Peshawr, had been
> disputed since before Pakistan formed in 1947.)
> The CIA went along, reasoning that the Islamists
> were the most immovably anti-communist groups
> available; the fact that they were also the most
> anti-western does not seem to have entered into
> their calculations."
>
> Well, we are in the midst of still another instance in which
> we have backed the wrong horse in foreign affairs. What that
> policy has gotten us, and Afghanistan, was the most
> oppressive, most evil, the most violent of all the political
> groups in Afghanistan. And, to think that our only concern
> in noticing the nation is the destruction of its cultural
> past by the Taliban, when the people are also being
> destroyed by the Taliban says something of the values we
> have after eight years of Bill Clinton.
>
> In Kosovo, the KLA has pretty much succeeded in killing or
> driving out everyone - Serbs, Romas, Jews, and others that
> are different from the fundamentalist Muslims who control
> the KLA. And, they have done to the Churches what the
> Taliban is doing to the Buddhist statues. They have blown
> them up. I've checked frequently on the Serbian Orthodox
> website (see:
> http://www.serbian-church.net/Svetinje/svetinje_e.html) over
> the past two years. In the beginning, the Church believed
> the West would care about their buildings being hit by KLA
> missiles. The West didn't care. Now, they merely catalogue
> the latest atrocities - the killings, the missile attacks,
> on the Churches.
>
> The media of the West used its power to demonize the Serbs.
> It merely has ignored the rape of Afghanistan until
> recently. Both the media and the Western governments seem
> too arrogant to confess to their mistaken judgments in both
> situations. In Kosovo, in spite of it being occupied by NATO
> troops and supposedly being overseen by the United Nations,
> what exists there, as in Afghanistan, is anarchy. The monks
> in Decani Monastery were critical of Slobodan Milosevic and
> believed that co-existence was possible with their KLA
> neighbors two years ago. Today, their website
> (http://www.decani.yunet.com/) shows pictures of demolished
> churches and dead priests.
>
> Today's Washington Post quotes "Cultural preservationists"
> as comparing the "Taliban's actions to those of other
> intolerant regimes that attempted to obliterate religious
> cultures, including the Chinese government's demolition of
> thousands of Buddhist monasteries in Tibet and the
> destruction of Jewish artifacts under Nazi rule in Germany."
>
> In the mostly American Air Force bombing of Yugoslavia for
> 79 days, over a "genocide" that UN financed forensic experts
> say never happened in Kosovo, Churches and monasteries,
> hospitals and schools were bombed. Since NATO troops and the
> UN have occupied Kosovo, the KLA has continued to
> systematically blow up churches and statues and to kill or
> drive out non-Albanians.
>
> George W. Bush said during his campaign that we, as a
> nation, needed to be more "humble." I agreed with him every
> time he said it. The key to being humble most of the time is
> repenting of one's wrong-doing. Perhaps the time has come
> for the new American president to apologize to the surviving
> Afghan and Serb people for the behavior of a past
> administration or two. After all, if we can apologize for
> accidentally blowing up a Japanese fishing boat, we ought to
> be able to apologize for arming the Taliban and the KLA and
> bombing Churches, monasteries, cemeteries, hospitals and
> schools in Yugoslavia, whether by accident or design.
>
> To comment: mmostert@...
>
> Mrs Jela Jovanovic, art historian
> Secretary General

---

Questa lista e' provvisoriamente curata da componenti
dell'ex Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'",
oggi "Comitato Promotore dell'Assemblea Antimperialista".

I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono questa struttura, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ti piace leggere?
Cosa preferisci?
I classici, gli erotici, le favole, la magia...?
Scopri le 5 straordinarie offerte: + del 50% di sconto!
da eCircle e Gullivertown
http://www.domeus.it/ad1170120/216.74.87.165