Informazione
(ANSA) - BRUXELLES, 9 OTT - Ecco un quadro delle sanzioni
economico finanziarie dell'Unione europea contro la Jugoslavia.
=== ABOLITE OGGI == - EMBARGO PETROLIFERO: vietava la vendita e le forniture di
greggio e prodotti petroliferi alla Serbia. Erano previste
eccezioni per l'iniziativa dell'Ue 'Energia per la democrazia',
volta a rifornire le municipalita' governate dall'opposizione a
Slobodan Milosevic, e per Kosovo e Montenegro.
- EMBARGO AEREO: vietava i collegamenti aerei verso la Serbia.
Era gia' stato sospeso dall'agosto scorso fino al 31 marzo 2001.
=== ANCORA IN VIGORE ==
- SANZIONI FINANZIARIE E BANDO INVESTIMENTI: sono provvedimenti
espressamente mirati a danneggiare Milosevic e il suo entourage.
Comprendono fra l'altro il congelamento di fondi all'estero del
governo jugoslavo, di quello serbo e di aziende sotto il loro
controllo; ed il divieto di investimenti in Serbia ed in
societa' controllate da Belgrado. I 15 hanno esentato dal blocco
un certo numero di aziende e soggetti non collegati al
regime.
- BANDO SUI VISTI: divieto di ingresso nei paesi Ue di
esponenti del governo jugoslavo, funzionari ed altre persone
considerate vicine a Milosevic; riguarda centinaia di
persone.
- EMBARGO ARMI E MATERIALE BELLICO: non e' un bando dell'Ue, ma
delle Nazioni Unite. Spettera' dunque al Consiglio di sicurezza
ogni eventuale intervento in proposito. (ANSA).
09/10/2000 17:15
(ANSA) - LUSSEMBURGO, 9 OTT - La situazione in Kosovo resta
''complessa e preoccupante'' e ''non si vede quale possa essere
lo snodo per arrivare ad una riconciliazione fra serbi e
kosovari''. E' quanto ha sottolineato oggi il ministro degli esteri
Lamberto Dini. ''Da un lato - ha detto Dini - ''la liberazione di
detenuti
kosovari da parte di Belgrado, come auspicato dall' Amministratore
dell'Onu
Bernard Kouchner, potrebbe essere un gesto distensivo. Dall'altro,
pero',
lo stesso Kouchner dice che i serbi non possono tornare in Kosovo perche
la
KFOR e l'UNMIK
non sono in grado di garantire la loro sicurezza. Il grado di animosita'
resta forte. In piu', nonostante i forti aiuti dell'Ue per la
ricostruzione, tutti i leader albanesi continuano ad invocare
l'indipendenza del Kosovo, che non e' prevista dalla risoluzione 1244
dell'Onu''.
(ANSA-AFP) - BELGRADO, 10 OTT - Il presidente jugoslavo Vojislav
Kostunica
ha detto che la Costituzione jugoslava non permette l'indipendenza del
Kosovo, la provincia serba attualmente sotto amministrazione dell'Onu.
''La
nostra Costituzione jugoslava non permette l'indipendenza del Kosovo, e
neppure l'indipendenza del Montenegro, in quanto sono elementi
costitutivi
del Paese, la Repubblica federale jugoslava'', ha dichiarato Kostunica
in
un'intervista alla televisione francese Tf1. A quelli che ''sperano o
sognano'' questa indipendenza, ''come i separatisti albanesi'', il
neopresidente jugoslavo replica che essa ''e' impossibile, in quanto
esiste
la risoluzione del Consiglio di sicurezza (dell'Onu), la 1244, che
garantisce l'integrita' territoriale e la sovranita' della Repubblica
federale jugoslava''. ''La questione del Kosovo deve essere regolata nel
quadro di questa risoluzione e non secondo gli auspici o i desideri di
certi leader albanesi, principalmente di quelli che sono orientati in
maniera separatista'', ha aggiunto Kostunica. A suo avviso, la piena
applicazione della risoluzione Onu, ''soprattutto sul punto dei
rifugiati
serbi (...) portera' la pace e la stabilita' nel Kosovo'', stabilita'
che
''ci e' assolutamente necessaria in questa situazione attuale in cui
c'e'
caos'', ha affermato ancora. (ANSA-AFP).
13:12 Il ministro degli esteri francese Vedrine e' a Belgrado per
incontrare, in qualita' di presidente di turno dell'Ue, Kostunica. Con
il
nuovo presidente jugoslavo Vedrine discutera' della decisione dei 15 di
abolire parte delle sanzioni contro la Jugoslavia. Vedrine in teoria
rischierebbe l'arresto, in quanto e' stato condannato, al pari di altri
dirigenti americani ed europei, a 20 anni di carcere per il suo ruolo
nei
bombardamenti Nato del '99.
18.00 (ANSA) - BELGRADO, 10 OTT - Il presidente jugoslavo Vojislav
Kostunica e' tornato oggi dai minatori del bacino carbonifero di
Kolubara per ringraziarli di avere dato con il loro sciopero un
forte segnale al resto del paese, culminato con la rivolta di
Belgrado di giovedi' e la marcia indietro di Slobodan Milosevic.
''Kolubara ha avuto un grande ruolo, un ruolo onorevole nei
cambiamenti democratici del paese. Abbiamo iniziato un mutamento
radicale che da' risultati gia' dopo pochi giorni'', ha detto il
presidente.
''Ieri - ha ricordato Kostunica, l'Unione europea ha
tolto le sanzioni, abbiamo ristabilito molti legami bilaterali.
Ho una buona notizia per voi: il ministro degli esteri francese
Hubert Vedrine (capo di turno dell'Ue che oggi era a Belgrado,
ndr) ha regalato ai minatori di Kolubara un milione di franchi
francesi'', circa 3 miliardi di lire.
''Possiamo essere fieri del fatto che il mondo ora guarda a
noi con ammirazione'', ha concluso. (ANSA).
AGI/AP) - Lussemburgo, 9 ott. - Il rappresentante speciale dell'Onu per
il
Kosovo Bernard Kouchner ha frenato sulla revoca delle sanzioni alla
Jugoslavia. Intervenendo alla riunione dei ministri degli Esteri dell'Ue
a
Lussemburgo, Kouchner ha chiesto che prima vi siano "passi concreti" di
Kostunica per risolvere la questione delle "migliaia" di kosovari ancora
dispersi o detenuti illegalmente a seguito della guerra dello scorso
anno.
"Abbiamo bisogno di un gesto dal nuovo governo democratico", ha spiegato
Kouchner. In un rapporto di 5 pagine consegnato ai capi delle diplomazie
dell'Unione, l'amministratore Onu ha delineato una serie di rischi che
possono derivare dalla vittoria di Kostunica se l'Occidente abbassera'
la
guardia in Kosovo. (AGI)
091346 OTT 00
---
Nove punti per discutere il futuro della Jugoslavia
(da CONTROPIANO - cpiano@...)
1. Una delle prime dichiarazioni di Koustonica - "presidente eletto"
dalle
cancellerie dell'Unione Europea ancora prima che dalle urne- � stata
quella
di decretare l'entrata della "Jugoslavia in Europa".
Koustonica e buona parte della popolazione che ha ritenuto di dover
contribuire ad eleggerlo, ignorano forse quanto questa ambizione si
riveli
contraddittoria rispetto alle proprie aspettative.
2. Non � secondario rammentare il nesso tra la dichiarazione
dell'ambasciatore USA a Belgrado, Zimmerman, sulla sopraggiunta
"inutilit�
della Jugoslavia cos� come era (la "cerniera tra est e ovest") dopo il
1989"
e la disgregazione sistematica che ha distrutto il paese a partire dalle
secessioni del 1991.
3. La disgregazione della Jugoslavia ha via via ridotto alla sola
Federazione serbo-montenegrina l'unica struttura statale che rifiutava
la
dissoluzione dello Stato come cambiale da pagare alle regole della
globalizzazione imperialista. La RFJ era uno dei pochissimi paesi
dell'Europa dell'Est a non aver accettato di entrare nella NATO n� nelle
forme di "partenariato" politico-militare costruite ad hoc dalla NATO
stessa. La liquidazione della leadership espressa dalla coalizione tra
Partito Socialista e Sinistra Unita Jugoslava, priva la Jugoslava di un
progetto nazionale indipendente da quelli elaborati nelle cancellerie
dell'Unione Europea. A questo obiettivo l'Unione Europea ha lavorato
apertamente e spudoratamente come ha riferito Mr. PESC, Javier Solana,
nella
intervista rilasciata a Repubblica del 30 settembre
4. Koustounica ha dichiarato di voler difendere l'identit� nazionale e i
confini statuali della RFJ. I fatti lo metteranno ben presto alla prova.
L'indipendenza del Kosovo, le ambizioni secessioniste del Montenegro, il
manifestarsi di spinte analoghe in Vojvodina, si presentano gi� come il
metro di misura con cui le cancellerie occidentali valuteranno la
attendibilit� di Koustonica. Al primo scostamento dai progetti di
spartizione e controllo dei Balcani previsti dai poli imperialisti, egli
sar� messo fuori campo come tutti gli uomini di paglia prodotti dalle
transizioni dirette dall'esterno.
5. In quella parte dell�Europa che comincia a Est della "frontiera di
Gorizia", nel 1989 vi erano 10 Stati (di cui la met� erano membri del
Patto
di Varsavia e del Comecon). Dieci anni dopo questi Stati sono diventati
28,
ma solo 11 di essi hanno una popolazione superiore ai dieci milioni di
abitanti. Si tratta dunque in gran parte di Stati piccoli e piccolissimi
che
hanno dato vita a secessioni dai vecchi stati-nazione (soprattutto
socialisti). In alcuni casi la secessione � stata "consensuale" in altri
pesantemente conflittuale. In questo secondo caso l�ingerenza esterna
(soprattutto della Germania nella fase iniziale) � stata determinante e
non
solo nel caso della Federazione Jugoslava. Nella dissoluzione della ex
URSS
il peso e le responsabilit� degli Stati Uniti sono state notevoli e
niente
affatto casuali.
6. La disgregazione di tutti gli Stati non appartenenti ai tre "poli
forti"
dell�imperialismo moderno (USA,UE e Giappone) � un processo che sta
marciando con forza dietro la tesi quasi religiosa della inevitabilit�
della
globalizzazione che renderebbe superflui gli Stati-Nazione. In realt�,
come
abbiamo pi� volte sottolineato, questa tesi � falsa in quanto esistono
Stati
"disgreganti" e Stati "disgregati". I Balcani e l�Eurasia (cos� come
l�Africa e buona parte dell�Asia) appartengono a questa seconda
categoria.
Questi nuovi Stati sono piccoli, deboli, subalterni agli organismi
finanziari internazionali (FMI,BM,BERS), dipendenti dalla quantit� di
investimenti esteri che riescono ad attrarre e dalla quantit� di export
che
riescono far arrivare sul mercato regionale e mondiale.
A tale scopo questi Stati devono essere "leggeri" nelle frontiere e
nelle
dogane, assai "indulgenti" nelle tasse e imposte per gli investitori
esteri,
obbedienti al FMI nella politica di privatizzazioni e liquidazione
dell�economia statale, puntuali nel pagamento dei debiti accumulati con
le
banche e gli istituti internazionali, implacabili nel mantenere basso e
disciplinato il salario dei lavoratori e il costo del lavoro pi�
complessivamente. Infine, ma non per importanza, devono assicurare con
ogni
mezzo la"stabilit� interna" per gli investitori esteri. Qualora la
funzione
coercitiva dei nuovi Stati non fosse sufficiente diventa automatico
l'intervento della nuova NATO che si � riconvertita proprio con tale
funzione.
7. La fortissima "dipendenza" dai poli forti, dagli investitori esteri e
dagli istituti finanziari internazionali, spiega in buona parte perch�
le
popolazioni dei nuovi stati "indipendenti" abbiano in realt� visto
peggiorare le loro condizioni di vita dopo le secessioni. Quasi ovunque
(con
le sole eccezioni di Slovenia, Polonia e Rep. Ceca) la ricchezza - ma
soprattutto la sua redistribuzione - si � ridotta significativamente.
Europa dell'Est: dieci anni dopo
Come il capitalismo ha portato indietro lo sviluppo
Paesi che hanno chiesto l'adesione all'Unione Europea Prodotto Interno
Lordo
attuale riferito ad un parametro 100 nel 1989 Differenza del PIL
1989-1999
Bulgaria 86 -14
Repubblica Ceca 95 -5
Estonia 76 -24
Ungheria 95 -5
Lettonia 59 -41
Polonia 117 +17
Romania 76 -24
Slovacchia 100 0
Slovenia 104 +4
Lituania 65 -35
(Fonte: Banca Europea per la Ricostruzione e Sviluppo, 1999)
Sulla base di questi dati, solo la Polonia e la Slovenia sembrano aver
migliorato la situazione economica rispetto al 1989. La Slovacchia
sarebbe
in parit� mentre Repubblica Ceca e Ungheria vi si avvicinano. Una stima
pi�
recente della BERS vede migliorare le "performance" di queste ultime
fino al
pareggio ed un ulteriore miglioramento per Slovenia, Polonia e
Slovacchia.
Tutti gli altri paesi restano al palo. Se teniamo conto che questo
rappresenta lo "sviluppo economico" di ben dieci anni, si comprende bene
che
l'integrazione di questi paesi nell'Unione Europea richiederebbe assai
di
pi� delle "lacrime e sangue" che abbiamo versato in Italia per
rispettare i
parametri di Maastricht.
8. Oggi l'Unione Europea si vuole "allargare" ai paesi dell'Europa
dell'Est.
Pertanto viene chiesto a questi paesi di rispettare i parametri di
convergenza previsti dai trattati fondativi dell'Unione Europea
(Maastricht
e Amsterdam). Sappiamo sulla nostra pelle quanto sia costato ad un paese
"ricco" come l'Italia (in termini di tagli alle spese e servizi sociali,
ai
salari o in nuove imposte) il rispetto dei parametri di Maastricht e
l'ingresso nell'area euro. Immaginiamo quale potr� essere il costo
sociale
per economie e societ� gi� devastate dalle ricette liberiste applicate
in
questi dieci anni nell'Europa dell'Est.
I dati ci dimostrano che questi paesi fanno gi� fatica a recuperare i
livelli di ricchezza che avevano nel famigerato 1989 (livelli che in
occidente venivano gi� ritenuti estremamente bassi). Figuriamoci cosa
pu�
significare per la Romania o l'Ungheria cercare di "convergere" con i
parametri di Maastricht sul debito pubblico o l'inflazione, tenendo
anche
conto che questi paesi hanno accumulato un debito estero rilevante e che
ipoteca da anni lo sviluppo economico.
9. La frantumazione della parte orientale dell�Eurasia, dunque, non �
stata
affatto determinata da problemi interni, etnici o da "odi atavici":
siamo in
presenza di un progetto di controllo, spartizione, concertazione e
competizione che vede protagonisti i due principali poli imperialisti
(USA
ed Unione Europea). La Repubblica Federale Jugoslava era un punto di
dissonanza nella spartizione dei Balcani. Ora che � nelle mani di uomini
affidabili per l'occidente, le multinazionali europee e statunitense si
contenderanno le concessioni per la navigazione sul Danubio, faranno
partire
i corridoi energetici rimasti in sospeso con l'aggressione di un anno
fa,
potranno spartire l'apparato produttivo e le infrastrutture di un paese
moderno devastato dalla guerra e dell'embargo. Da qui occorre partire se
vogliamo darci spiegazioni razionali per la guerra e l'operazione contro
la
Jugoslavia. La "vittoria" di Koustonica dopo 10 anni chiude questo
cerchio.
E adesso....benvenuti in questa Europa!!!
---
Da ?La Stampa?
"�Next stop, Belarus�; ultima ?fermata?, il capolinea: la
Russia."
A Minsk, a Minsk
�Next stop, Belarus�, la prossima fermata � la Bielorussia,
scrive il Washington Post in un editoriale assai tempestivo.
S?intende dopo la fermata jugoslava. Anzi serba, poich� tutti
danno per scontato che - scorporato il Kosovo - anche il
Montenegro uscir� dalla Federazione Jugoslava. Dunque occorre
prepararsi a moti e manifestazioni che prima scuoteranno e poi
abbatteranno colui che il Washington Post definisce il �pomposo
dittatore dell?assediata Belarus�. La prima tappa sar� quella
delle prossime elezioni parlamentari, previste per domenica, che
il quotidiano di Washington ha gi� preventivamente squalificato
come ?phony?, cio� truccate, invalide. Quella finale sar� l?anno
prossimo, alla scadenza del mandato - anch?esso ?fasullo? - di
Aleksandr Lukascenko. Se - come scrive il giornale americano -
�l?Occidente decider� fermamente di sostenere i democratici e
rifiuter� di riconoscere le elezioni-farsa, i cittadini di
Belarus potranno trovare la forza di mettersi nella scia dei
serbi�. Cos� comincia, anzi prosegue, il processo che condurr�
inesorabilmente alla liquidazione dell?ultima anomalia europea.
Viviamo nell?epoca della rivoluzione dell?informazione-
comunicazione e non c?� pi� dittatore che possa impedire ai suoi
sudditi di ascoltare, guardare, gioire dell?incessante afflusso
di verit� proveniente dall?esterno. Non occorrer� dunque
bombardare, come a Belgrado, l?emittente televisiva statale.
Forte delle proprie convinzioni l?Occidente potr� dunque usare
tutti i mezzi a propria disposizione, per ottenere il risultato
desiderato. Poich� - come aggiunge il Washington Post - �cosa mai
potrebbe meglio coincidere con gli interessi degli Usa che un
continente europeo pacifico, democratico e libero?�. Se qualcuno
si stupisse, data l?apparente irrilevanza economica e politica
dei circa 10 milioni di bielorussi, si sbaglierebbe. Anche i
serbi sono all?incirca 10 milioni e non si � badato a spese per
normalizzarli, sempre che Spiegel non menta quando rivela che
Kostunica e le opposizioni hanno ricevuto dalla Germania 20
milioni di marchi, cui vanno aggiunti 30 milioni di dollari
dall?America. E si capisce perch�. Non � questione delle
dimensioni dell??infezione?, quanto del suo significato
simbolico: non basta colpirla, occorre debellarla. Pertanto la
nazione-paria verr� inondata di promesse di benessere, per chi
accetter� di farsi portatore dei valori dell?Occidente.
L?opposizione sar� finanziaria e assistita poich� si dovr� tenere
conto dell?inesperienza democratica e della prevaricazione cui �
esposta da parte di un potere ?criminale?. Per gli altri - dal
?dittatore? Lukascenko ai suoi sostenitori, certamente colpevoli,
fossero anche maggioranza - promesse di punizioni esemplari.
Cosicch� le campagne elettorali verranno opportunamente
riequilibrate, mettendo il potere sulla difensiva e
costringendolo a reagire con misure che appariranno liberticide e
tali da suscitare l?esecrazione internazionale. Ingerenza negli
affari interni di uno stato sovrano? Sciocchezze da anime belle.
La ?sovranit� limitata? � cattiva solo se esercitata dai cattivi.
Ultima ?fermata?, il capolinea: la Russia.
Giulietto Chiesa
---
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Oct. 19, 2000
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------
INTERNATIONAL ACTION CENTER SPEAKS TO THE ANTI-
GLOBALIZATION MOVEMENT:
WHAT YOUR SHOULD KNOW ABOUT EVENTS IN YUGOSLAVIA
[The International Action Center released the following
statement Oct. 11.]
The corporate-backed politicians all agree. The torching of
Yugoslavia's parliament and the overthrow of President
Slobodan Milosevic was a "triumph for democracy." That's
what Bill Clinton says. So do George W. Bush, Dick Cheney,
Mad e leine Albright, Al Gore and the Joint Chiefs of Staff
at the Pentagon. CNN, NBC, CBS and Time magazine say so too.
WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
In Seattle, Washington, Philadelphia and Los Angeles,
protesters were gassed, beaten, shot with rubber bullets and
held for days in overcrowded cells. The media called us
"rioters" and "vandals" and told us to go home and "seek
change through the ballot box." But in Yugoslavia the CIA
and State Department urged the "opposition" to boycott the
second round of elections, march in the streets and attack
government offices.
It is supposed to be a crime for any U.S. political
candidate to accept donations from abroad. But Washington
gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Vojislav Kostunica's
"Democratic Opposition of Serbia" before the Sept. 24
elections.
FROM BOMBERS TO 'DEMOCRATS'
Last year the United States and other NATO powers rained
bombs and missiles on Yugoslavia for 78 days. They destroyed
homes, schools and hospitals. They killed and maimed
thousands, including hundreds of children. The U.S. media
and politicians justified these war crimes with a lie
campaign demonizing all Serbs. Now the politicians and
generals who ordered the bombing and the media who justified
it claim to be champions of the rights of the Serbian
people.
There is no inconsistency here. All over the world
Washington's attitude is guided by concern for corporate
interests. U.S. policy toward Yugoslavia is war by other
means.
MILOSEVIC SAID NO TO IMF
Slobodan Milosevic may not be a revolutionary in the mold of
Fidel Castro or Che Guevara. But in the eyes of Washington
he committed the same sin as the protesters in Seattle and
Prague: He said no to the New World Order and the
International Monetary Fund.
Under the leadership of his Serbian Socialist Party, the
United Left and the Montenegrin People's Socialist Party,
Yugoslavia refused to join NATO or accept IMF-dictated
"economic restructuring." It resisted privatization and the
"free flow of capital" demanded by Wall Street. For that
reason--and that alone--Yugoslavia was the target of eight
years of war and economic sanctions by the U.S. and NATO and
a nonstop campaign of lies by the biggest propaganda machine
in history--the U.S. corporate news media.
KOSTUNICA SAID YES
On Sept. 27, unknown to most of their followers, leaders of
the U.S.-funded "Democratic Opposition" met with
representatives of the IMF and the World Bank in Sofia,
Bulgaria. They agreed that if they came to power they would
hike prices, privatize industry, lay off workers and
dismantle Yugoslavia's free health-care system. That's
right: Yugoslavia has free health care--and the IMF wants to
destroy it!
These are the same measures that have devastated Bulgaria,
Romania, the former Soviet republics and countries
throughout Africa, Asia and Latin America. That was the
price of Washington's support.
A CLASSIC CIA OPERATION
Kostunica and his CIA advisers arrogantly rejected a second
round of elections. They feared that even if they won--a big
"if"--the elected Socialist parliamentary majority would
block the IMF's program. Kostunica and the CIA wanted to
take power by force in order to intimidate or disband the
parliament and crush the Serbian Socialist Party and its
allies. They wanted to send a message to anyone in East
Europe who would resist Washington and Wall Street.
In 1993 the White House encouraged Boris Yeltsin to send
tanks to shell Russia's parliament when it refused to accept
IMF "shock therapy." Hundreds were massacred. Clinton called
that a "triumph for democracy" too.
The Pentagon, State Department and CIA have decades of
experience overthrowing independent governments. They've
done it in Iran (1953), Guate mala (1954), Congo (1961),
Guyana (1962), Indonesia (1965), Ghana (1966), Chile (1973),
Argentina (1976), Romania (1989), Bulgaria (1990) and
Albania (1991).
In Indonesia a CIA-backed junta executed nearly 1 million
people in the name of "democracy." The New York Times called
that slaughter a "gleam of light in Asia."
The formula is generally the same. Cause tremendous hardship
for the people of the target country. Create a pro-U.S.
"opposition" and pump it full of dollars. Promise that if
Washington gets its way, people may again live a "normal"
life.
It's a lie! The IMF and World Bank are agencies of
destruction. They aim to destroy all avenues of economic
life that are not controlled by Wall Street. When they take
over a country life always gets worse. Workers in Bulgaria
now live on 56 cents a day.
FIGHT THE POWER
The media call the coup in Yugoslavia an "endgame." But it
is unlikely that the U.S.-backed regime can implement its
program without force. The new movement against corporate
globalization must stand with all those around the world who
are fighting injustice--from Colombia to Zimbabwe to
Palestine.
That includes those in Yugoslavia and across East Europe who
are resisting the tyranny of NATO and the IMF.
- END -
(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
ww@.... For subscription info send message to:
info@.... Web: http://www.workers.org)
==
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eCircle ti offre una nuova opportunita:
la tua agenda sul web - per te e per i tuoi amici
Organizza on line i tuoi appuntamenti .
E' facile, veloce e gratuito!
Da oggi su
http://www.ecircle.de/ad182550/www.ecircle.it
economico finanziarie dell'Unione europea contro la Jugoslavia.
=== ABOLITE OGGI == - EMBARGO PETROLIFERO: vietava la vendita e le forniture di
greggio e prodotti petroliferi alla Serbia. Erano previste
eccezioni per l'iniziativa dell'Ue 'Energia per la democrazia',
volta a rifornire le municipalita' governate dall'opposizione a
Slobodan Milosevic, e per Kosovo e Montenegro.
- EMBARGO AEREO: vietava i collegamenti aerei verso la Serbia.
Era gia' stato sospeso dall'agosto scorso fino al 31 marzo 2001.
=== ANCORA IN VIGORE ==
- SANZIONI FINANZIARIE E BANDO INVESTIMENTI: sono provvedimenti
espressamente mirati a danneggiare Milosevic e il suo entourage.
Comprendono fra l'altro il congelamento di fondi all'estero del
governo jugoslavo, di quello serbo e di aziende sotto il loro
controllo; ed il divieto di investimenti in Serbia ed in
societa' controllate da Belgrado. I 15 hanno esentato dal blocco
un certo numero di aziende e soggetti non collegati al
regime.
- BANDO SUI VISTI: divieto di ingresso nei paesi Ue di
esponenti del governo jugoslavo, funzionari ed altre persone
considerate vicine a Milosevic; riguarda centinaia di
persone.
- EMBARGO ARMI E MATERIALE BELLICO: non e' un bando dell'Ue, ma
delle Nazioni Unite. Spettera' dunque al Consiglio di sicurezza
ogni eventuale intervento in proposito. (ANSA).
09/10/2000 17:15
(ANSA) - LUSSEMBURGO, 9 OTT - La situazione in Kosovo resta
''complessa e preoccupante'' e ''non si vede quale possa essere
lo snodo per arrivare ad una riconciliazione fra serbi e
kosovari''. E' quanto ha sottolineato oggi il ministro degli esteri
Lamberto Dini. ''Da un lato - ha detto Dini - ''la liberazione di
detenuti
kosovari da parte di Belgrado, come auspicato dall' Amministratore
dell'Onu
Bernard Kouchner, potrebbe essere un gesto distensivo. Dall'altro,
pero',
lo stesso Kouchner dice che i serbi non possono tornare in Kosovo perche
la
KFOR e l'UNMIK
non sono in grado di garantire la loro sicurezza. Il grado di animosita'
resta forte. In piu', nonostante i forti aiuti dell'Ue per la
ricostruzione, tutti i leader albanesi continuano ad invocare
l'indipendenza del Kosovo, che non e' prevista dalla risoluzione 1244
dell'Onu''.
(ANSA-AFP) - BELGRADO, 10 OTT - Il presidente jugoslavo Vojislav
Kostunica
ha detto che la Costituzione jugoslava non permette l'indipendenza del
Kosovo, la provincia serba attualmente sotto amministrazione dell'Onu.
''La
nostra Costituzione jugoslava non permette l'indipendenza del Kosovo, e
neppure l'indipendenza del Montenegro, in quanto sono elementi
costitutivi
del Paese, la Repubblica federale jugoslava'', ha dichiarato Kostunica
in
un'intervista alla televisione francese Tf1. A quelli che ''sperano o
sognano'' questa indipendenza, ''come i separatisti albanesi'', il
neopresidente jugoslavo replica che essa ''e' impossibile, in quanto
esiste
la risoluzione del Consiglio di sicurezza (dell'Onu), la 1244, che
garantisce l'integrita' territoriale e la sovranita' della Repubblica
federale jugoslava''. ''La questione del Kosovo deve essere regolata nel
quadro di questa risoluzione e non secondo gli auspici o i desideri di
certi leader albanesi, principalmente di quelli che sono orientati in
maniera separatista'', ha aggiunto Kostunica. A suo avviso, la piena
applicazione della risoluzione Onu, ''soprattutto sul punto dei
rifugiati
serbi (...) portera' la pace e la stabilita' nel Kosovo'', stabilita'
che
''ci e' assolutamente necessaria in questa situazione attuale in cui
c'e'
caos'', ha affermato ancora. (ANSA-AFP).
13:12 Il ministro degli esteri francese Vedrine e' a Belgrado per
incontrare, in qualita' di presidente di turno dell'Ue, Kostunica. Con
il
nuovo presidente jugoslavo Vedrine discutera' della decisione dei 15 di
abolire parte delle sanzioni contro la Jugoslavia. Vedrine in teoria
rischierebbe l'arresto, in quanto e' stato condannato, al pari di altri
dirigenti americani ed europei, a 20 anni di carcere per il suo ruolo
nei
bombardamenti Nato del '99.
18.00 (ANSA) - BELGRADO, 10 OTT - Il presidente jugoslavo Vojislav
Kostunica e' tornato oggi dai minatori del bacino carbonifero di
Kolubara per ringraziarli di avere dato con il loro sciopero un
forte segnale al resto del paese, culminato con la rivolta di
Belgrado di giovedi' e la marcia indietro di Slobodan Milosevic.
''Kolubara ha avuto un grande ruolo, un ruolo onorevole nei
cambiamenti democratici del paese. Abbiamo iniziato un mutamento
radicale che da' risultati gia' dopo pochi giorni'', ha detto il
presidente.
''Ieri - ha ricordato Kostunica, l'Unione europea ha
tolto le sanzioni, abbiamo ristabilito molti legami bilaterali.
Ho una buona notizia per voi: il ministro degli esteri francese
Hubert Vedrine (capo di turno dell'Ue che oggi era a Belgrado,
ndr) ha regalato ai minatori di Kolubara un milione di franchi
francesi'', circa 3 miliardi di lire.
''Possiamo essere fieri del fatto che il mondo ora guarda a
noi con ammirazione'', ha concluso. (ANSA).
AGI/AP) - Lussemburgo, 9 ott. - Il rappresentante speciale dell'Onu per
il
Kosovo Bernard Kouchner ha frenato sulla revoca delle sanzioni alla
Jugoslavia. Intervenendo alla riunione dei ministri degli Esteri dell'Ue
a
Lussemburgo, Kouchner ha chiesto che prima vi siano "passi concreti" di
Kostunica per risolvere la questione delle "migliaia" di kosovari ancora
dispersi o detenuti illegalmente a seguito della guerra dello scorso
anno.
"Abbiamo bisogno di un gesto dal nuovo governo democratico", ha spiegato
Kouchner. In un rapporto di 5 pagine consegnato ai capi delle diplomazie
dell'Unione, l'amministratore Onu ha delineato una serie di rischi che
possono derivare dalla vittoria di Kostunica se l'Occidente abbassera'
la
guardia in Kosovo. (AGI)
091346 OTT 00
---
Nove punti per discutere il futuro della Jugoslavia
(da CONTROPIANO - cpiano@...)
1. Una delle prime dichiarazioni di Koustonica - "presidente eletto"
dalle
cancellerie dell'Unione Europea ancora prima che dalle urne- � stata
quella
di decretare l'entrata della "Jugoslavia in Europa".
Koustonica e buona parte della popolazione che ha ritenuto di dover
contribuire ad eleggerlo, ignorano forse quanto questa ambizione si
riveli
contraddittoria rispetto alle proprie aspettative.
2. Non � secondario rammentare il nesso tra la dichiarazione
dell'ambasciatore USA a Belgrado, Zimmerman, sulla sopraggiunta
"inutilit�
della Jugoslavia cos� come era (la "cerniera tra est e ovest") dopo il
1989"
e la disgregazione sistematica che ha distrutto il paese a partire dalle
secessioni del 1991.
3. La disgregazione della Jugoslavia ha via via ridotto alla sola
Federazione serbo-montenegrina l'unica struttura statale che rifiutava
la
dissoluzione dello Stato come cambiale da pagare alle regole della
globalizzazione imperialista. La RFJ era uno dei pochissimi paesi
dell'Europa dell'Est a non aver accettato di entrare nella NATO n� nelle
forme di "partenariato" politico-militare costruite ad hoc dalla NATO
stessa. La liquidazione della leadership espressa dalla coalizione tra
Partito Socialista e Sinistra Unita Jugoslava, priva la Jugoslava di un
progetto nazionale indipendente da quelli elaborati nelle cancellerie
dell'Unione Europea. A questo obiettivo l'Unione Europea ha lavorato
apertamente e spudoratamente come ha riferito Mr. PESC, Javier Solana,
nella
intervista rilasciata a Repubblica del 30 settembre
4. Koustounica ha dichiarato di voler difendere l'identit� nazionale e i
confini statuali della RFJ. I fatti lo metteranno ben presto alla prova.
L'indipendenza del Kosovo, le ambizioni secessioniste del Montenegro, il
manifestarsi di spinte analoghe in Vojvodina, si presentano gi� come il
metro di misura con cui le cancellerie occidentali valuteranno la
attendibilit� di Koustonica. Al primo scostamento dai progetti di
spartizione e controllo dei Balcani previsti dai poli imperialisti, egli
sar� messo fuori campo come tutti gli uomini di paglia prodotti dalle
transizioni dirette dall'esterno.
5. In quella parte dell�Europa che comincia a Est della "frontiera di
Gorizia", nel 1989 vi erano 10 Stati (di cui la met� erano membri del
Patto
di Varsavia e del Comecon). Dieci anni dopo questi Stati sono diventati
28,
ma solo 11 di essi hanno una popolazione superiore ai dieci milioni di
abitanti. Si tratta dunque in gran parte di Stati piccoli e piccolissimi
che
hanno dato vita a secessioni dai vecchi stati-nazione (soprattutto
socialisti). In alcuni casi la secessione � stata "consensuale" in altri
pesantemente conflittuale. In questo secondo caso l�ingerenza esterna
(soprattutto della Germania nella fase iniziale) � stata determinante e
non
solo nel caso della Federazione Jugoslava. Nella dissoluzione della ex
URSS
il peso e le responsabilit� degli Stati Uniti sono state notevoli e
niente
affatto casuali.
6. La disgregazione di tutti gli Stati non appartenenti ai tre "poli
forti"
dell�imperialismo moderno (USA,UE e Giappone) � un processo che sta
marciando con forza dietro la tesi quasi religiosa della inevitabilit�
della
globalizzazione che renderebbe superflui gli Stati-Nazione. In realt�,
come
abbiamo pi� volte sottolineato, questa tesi � falsa in quanto esistono
Stati
"disgreganti" e Stati "disgregati". I Balcani e l�Eurasia (cos� come
l�Africa e buona parte dell�Asia) appartengono a questa seconda
categoria.
Questi nuovi Stati sono piccoli, deboli, subalterni agli organismi
finanziari internazionali (FMI,BM,BERS), dipendenti dalla quantit� di
investimenti esteri che riescono ad attrarre e dalla quantit� di export
che
riescono far arrivare sul mercato regionale e mondiale.
A tale scopo questi Stati devono essere "leggeri" nelle frontiere e
nelle
dogane, assai "indulgenti" nelle tasse e imposte per gli investitori
esteri,
obbedienti al FMI nella politica di privatizzazioni e liquidazione
dell�economia statale, puntuali nel pagamento dei debiti accumulati con
le
banche e gli istituti internazionali, implacabili nel mantenere basso e
disciplinato il salario dei lavoratori e il costo del lavoro pi�
complessivamente. Infine, ma non per importanza, devono assicurare con
ogni
mezzo la"stabilit� interna" per gli investitori esteri. Qualora la
funzione
coercitiva dei nuovi Stati non fosse sufficiente diventa automatico
l'intervento della nuova NATO che si � riconvertita proprio con tale
funzione.
7. La fortissima "dipendenza" dai poli forti, dagli investitori esteri e
dagli istituti finanziari internazionali, spiega in buona parte perch�
le
popolazioni dei nuovi stati "indipendenti" abbiano in realt� visto
peggiorare le loro condizioni di vita dopo le secessioni. Quasi ovunque
(con
le sole eccezioni di Slovenia, Polonia e Rep. Ceca) la ricchezza - ma
soprattutto la sua redistribuzione - si � ridotta significativamente.
Europa dell'Est: dieci anni dopo
Come il capitalismo ha portato indietro lo sviluppo
Paesi che hanno chiesto l'adesione all'Unione Europea Prodotto Interno
Lordo
attuale riferito ad un parametro 100 nel 1989 Differenza del PIL
1989-1999
Bulgaria 86 -14
Repubblica Ceca 95 -5
Estonia 76 -24
Ungheria 95 -5
Lettonia 59 -41
Polonia 117 +17
Romania 76 -24
Slovacchia 100 0
Slovenia 104 +4
Lituania 65 -35
(Fonte: Banca Europea per la Ricostruzione e Sviluppo, 1999)
Sulla base di questi dati, solo la Polonia e la Slovenia sembrano aver
migliorato la situazione economica rispetto al 1989. La Slovacchia
sarebbe
in parit� mentre Repubblica Ceca e Ungheria vi si avvicinano. Una stima
pi�
recente della BERS vede migliorare le "performance" di queste ultime
fino al
pareggio ed un ulteriore miglioramento per Slovenia, Polonia e
Slovacchia.
Tutti gli altri paesi restano al palo. Se teniamo conto che questo
rappresenta lo "sviluppo economico" di ben dieci anni, si comprende bene
che
l'integrazione di questi paesi nell'Unione Europea richiederebbe assai
di
pi� delle "lacrime e sangue" che abbiamo versato in Italia per
rispettare i
parametri di Maastricht.
8. Oggi l'Unione Europea si vuole "allargare" ai paesi dell'Europa
dell'Est.
Pertanto viene chiesto a questi paesi di rispettare i parametri di
convergenza previsti dai trattati fondativi dell'Unione Europea
(Maastricht
e Amsterdam). Sappiamo sulla nostra pelle quanto sia costato ad un paese
"ricco" come l'Italia (in termini di tagli alle spese e servizi sociali,
ai
salari o in nuove imposte) il rispetto dei parametri di Maastricht e
l'ingresso nell'area euro. Immaginiamo quale potr� essere il costo
sociale
per economie e societ� gi� devastate dalle ricette liberiste applicate
in
questi dieci anni nell'Europa dell'Est.
I dati ci dimostrano che questi paesi fanno gi� fatica a recuperare i
livelli di ricchezza che avevano nel famigerato 1989 (livelli che in
occidente venivano gi� ritenuti estremamente bassi). Figuriamoci cosa
pu�
significare per la Romania o l'Ungheria cercare di "convergere" con i
parametri di Maastricht sul debito pubblico o l'inflazione, tenendo
anche
conto che questi paesi hanno accumulato un debito estero rilevante e che
ipoteca da anni lo sviluppo economico.
9. La frantumazione della parte orientale dell�Eurasia, dunque, non �
stata
affatto determinata da problemi interni, etnici o da "odi atavici":
siamo in
presenza di un progetto di controllo, spartizione, concertazione e
competizione che vede protagonisti i due principali poli imperialisti
(USA
ed Unione Europea). La Repubblica Federale Jugoslava era un punto di
dissonanza nella spartizione dei Balcani. Ora che � nelle mani di uomini
affidabili per l'occidente, le multinazionali europee e statunitense si
contenderanno le concessioni per la navigazione sul Danubio, faranno
partire
i corridoi energetici rimasti in sospeso con l'aggressione di un anno
fa,
potranno spartire l'apparato produttivo e le infrastrutture di un paese
moderno devastato dalla guerra e dell'embargo. Da qui occorre partire se
vogliamo darci spiegazioni razionali per la guerra e l'operazione contro
la
Jugoslavia. La "vittoria" di Koustonica dopo 10 anni chiude questo
cerchio.
E adesso....benvenuti in questa Europa!!!
---
Da ?La Stampa?
"�Next stop, Belarus�; ultima ?fermata?, il capolinea: la
Russia."
A Minsk, a Minsk
�Next stop, Belarus�, la prossima fermata � la Bielorussia,
scrive il Washington Post in un editoriale assai tempestivo.
S?intende dopo la fermata jugoslava. Anzi serba, poich� tutti
danno per scontato che - scorporato il Kosovo - anche il
Montenegro uscir� dalla Federazione Jugoslava. Dunque occorre
prepararsi a moti e manifestazioni che prima scuoteranno e poi
abbatteranno colui che il Washington Post definisce il �pomposo
dittatore dell?assediata Belarus�. La prima tappa sar� quella
delle prossime elezioni parlamentari, previste per domenica, che
il quotidiano di Washington ha gi� preventivamente squalificato
come ?phony?, cio� truccate, invalide. Quella finale sar� l?anno
prossimo, alla scadenza del mandato - anch?esso ?fasullo? - di
Aleksandr Lukascenko. Se - come scrive il giornale americano -
�l?Occidente decider� fermamente di sostenere i democratici e
rifiuter� di riconoscere le elezioni-farsa, i cittadini di
Belarus potranno trovare la forza di mettersi nella scia dei
serbi�. Cos� comincia, anzi prosegue, il processo che condurr�
inesorabilmente alla liquidazione dell?ultima anomalia europea.
Viviamo nell?epoca della rivoluzione dell?informazione-
comunicazione e non c?� pi� dittatore che possa impedire ai suoi
sudditi di ascoltare, guardare, gioire dell?incessante afflusso
di verit� proveniente dall?esterno. Non occorrer� dunque
bombardare, come a Belgrado, l?emittente televisiva statale.
Forte delle proprie convinzioni l?Occidente potr� dunque usare
tutti i mezzi a propria disposizione, per ottenere il risultato
desiderato. Poich� - come aggiunge il Washington Post - �cosa mai
potrebbe meglio coincidere con gli interessi degli Usa che un
continente europeo pacifico, democratico e libero?�. Se qualcuno
si stupisse, data l?apparente irrilevanza economica e politica
dei circa 10 milioni di bielorussi, si sbaglierebbe. Anche i
serbi sono all?incirca 10 milioni e non si � badato a spese per
normalizzarli, sempre che Spiegel non menta quando rivela che
Kostunica e le opposizioni hanno ricevuto dalla Germania 20
milioni di marchi, cui vanno aggiunti 30 milioni di dollari
dall?America. E si capisce perch�. Non � questione delle
dimensioni dell??infezione?, quanto del suo significato
simbolico: non basta colpirla, occorre debellarla. Pertanto la
nazione-paria verr� inondata di promesse di benessere, per chi
accetter� di farsi portatore dei valori dell?Occidente.
L?opposizione sar� finanziaria e assistita poich� si dovr� tenere
conto dell?inesperienza democratica e della prevaricazione cui �
esposta da parte di un potere ?criminale?. Per gli altri - dal
?dittatore? Lukascenko ai suoi sostenitori, certamente colpevoli,
fossero anche maggioranza - promesse di punizioni esemplari.
Cosicch� le campagne elettorali verranno opportunamente
riequilibrate, mettendo il potere sulla difensiva e
costringendolo a reagire con misure che appariranno liberticide e
tali da suscitare l?esecrazione internazionale. Ingerenza negli
affari interni di uno stato sovrano? Sciocchezze da anime belle.
La ?sovranit� limitata? � cattiva solo se esercitata dai cattivi.
Ultima ?fermata?, il capolinea: la Russia.
Giulietto Chiesa
---
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Oct. 19, 2000
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------
INTERNATIONAL ACTION CENTER SPEAKS TO THE ANTI-
GLOBALIZATION MOVEMENT:
WHAT YOUR SHOULD KNOW ABOUT EVENTS IN YUGOSLAVIA
[The International Action Center released the following
statement Oct. 11.]
The corporate-backed politicians all agree. The torching of
Yugoslavia's parliament and the overthrow of President
Slobodan Milosevic was a "triumph for democracy." That's
what Bill Clinton says. So do George W. Bush, Dick Cheney,
Mad e leine Albright, Al Gore and the Joint Chiefs of Staff
at the Pentagon. CNN, NBC, CBS and Time magazine say so too.
WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
In Seattle, Washington, Philadelphia and Los Angeles,
protesters were gassed, beaten, shot with rubber bullets and
held for days in overcrowded cells. The media called us
"rioters" and "vandals" and told us to go home and "seek
change through the ballot box." But in Yugoslavia the CIA
and State Department urged the "opposition" to boycott the
second round of elections, march in the streets and attack
government offices.
It is supposed to be a crime for any U.S. political
candidate to accept donations from abroad. But Washington
gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Vojislav Kostunica's
"Democratic Opposition of Serbia" before the Sept. 24
elections.
FROM BOMBERS TO 'DEMOCRATS'
Last year the United States and other NATO powers rained
bombs and missiles on Yugoslavia for 78 days. They destroyed
homes, schools and hospitals. They killed and maimed
thousands, including hundreds of children. The U.S. media
and politicians justified these war crimes with a lie
campaign demonizing all Serbs. Now the politicians and
generals who ordered the bombing and the media who justified
it claim to be champions of the rights of the Serbian
people.
There is no inconsistency here. All over the world
Washington's attitude is guided by concern for corporate
interests. U.S. policy toward Yugoslavia is war by other
means.
MILOSEVIC SAID NO TO IMF
Slobodan Milosevic may not be a revolutionary in the mold of
Fidel Castro or Che Guevara. But in the eyes of Washington
he committed the same sin as the protesters in Seattle and
Prague: He said no to the New World Order and the
International Monetary Fund.
Under the leadership of his Serbian Socialist Party, the
United Left and the Montenegrin People's Socialist Party,
Yugoslavia refused to join NATO or accept IMF-dictated
"economic restructuring." It resisted privatization and the
"free flow of capital" demanded by Wall Street. For that
reason--and that alone--Yugoslavia was the target of eight
years of war and economic sanctions by the U.S. and NATO and
a nonstop campaign of lies by the biggest propaganda machine
in history--the U.S. corporate news media.
KOSTUNICA SAID YES
On Sept. 27, unknown to most of their followers, leaders of
the U.S.-funded "Democratic Opposition" met with
representatives of the IMF and the World Bank in Sofia,
Bulgaria. They agreed that if they came to power they would
hike prices, privatize industry, lay off workers and
dismantle Yugoslavia's free health-care system. That's
right: Yugoslavia has free health care--and the IMF wants to
destroy it!
These are the same measures that have devastated Bulgaria,
Romania, the former Soviet republics and countries
throughout Africa, Asia and Latin America. That was the
price of Washington's support.
A CLASSIC CIA OPERATION
Kostunica and his CIA advisers arrogantly rejected a second
round of elections. They feared that even if they won--a big
"if"--the elected Socialist parliamentary majority would
block the IMF's program. Kostunica and the CIA wanted to
take power by force in order to intimidate or disband the
parliament and crush the Serbian Socialist Party and its
allies. They wanted to send a message to anyone in East
Europe who would resist Washington and Wall Street.
In 1993 the White House encouraged Boris Yeltsin to send
tanks to shell Russia's parliament when it refused to accept
IMF "shock therapy." Hundreds were massacred. Clinton called
that a "triumph for democracy" too.
The Pentagon, State Department and CIA have decades of
experience overthrowing independent governments. They've
done it in Iran (1953), Guate mala (1954), Congo (1961),
Guyana (1962), Indonesia (1965), Ghana (1966), Chile (1973),
Argentina (1976), Romania (1989), Bulgaria (1990) and
Albania (1991).
In Indonesia a CIA-backed junta executed nearly 1 million
people in the name of "democracy." The New York Times called
that slaughter a "gleam of light in Asia."
The formula is generally the same. Cause tremendous hardship
for the people of the target country. Create a pro-U.S.
"opposition" and pump it full of dollars. Promise that if
Washington gets its way, people may again live a "normal"
life.
It's a lie! The IMF and World Bank are agencies of
destruction. They aim to destroy all avenues of economic
life that are not controlled by Wall Street. When they take
over a country life always gets worse. Workers in Bulgaria
now live on 56 cents a day.
FIGHT THE POWER
The media call the coup in Yugoslavia an "endgame." But it
is unlikely that the U.S.-backed regime can implement its
program without force. The new movement against corporate
globalization must stand with all those around the world who
are fighting injustice--from Colombia to Zimbabwe to
Palestine.
That includes those in Yugoslavia and across East Europe who
are resisting the tyranny of NATO and the IMF.
- END -
(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
ww@.... For subscription info send message to:
info@.... Web: http://www.workers.org)
==
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eCircle ti offre una nuova opportunita:
la tua agenda sul web - per te e per i tuoi amici
Organizza on line i tuoi appuntamenti .
E' facile, veloce e gratuito!
Da oggi su
http://www.ecircle.de/ad182550/www.ecircle.it
"To be partly controlled by the CIA? That doesn't bother me
much "
Fonti:
> http://www.ptb.be/solidaire/article.phtml?lang=1&obid)72
> http://www.iacenter.org/yugo_crisis.htm
---
Interview de deux activistes du mouvement Otpor
�Etre partiellement contr�l� par la CIA? �a
ne me d�range pas trop�
Rencontre avec deux membres d?Otpor, ce
mouvement �tudiant �ind�pendant� dont la presse occidentale
parle tant. C?�tait le 2 ao�t dernier, dans
un caf� de Kragujevac?
G�rard Mugemangango et Michel Collon
Qu?est-ce que le mouvement Otpor?
Ivana. C?est une organisation des jeunes
des facult�s et des �coles sup�rieures. Personne n?y a plus de
27 ans et tous nos adh�rents sont membres
du parti d�mocratique (opposition). Mais nos activit�s sont
diff�rentes: actions, shows, distribution
de propagande, etc.
C?est surtout la vie tr�s difficile en
Serbie qui para�t les affecter?
Nenad. Mon p�re poss�de la m�me voiture
depuis treize ans, il ne peut pas s?en payer d?autre. Quant �
moi, musicien, je suis oblig�, pour gagner
ma vie, de jouer avec certains groupes que je n?aime pas. Et je
suis �galement oblig� de travailler dans la
petite soci�t� de mon p�re.
Ivana et Nenad semblent attendre �norm�ment
de l?Ouest?
Nenad. La Yougoslavie est un bon endroit
pour investir : elle se situe au centre de l?Europe, poss�de des
mines tr�s riches ainsi que le Danube avec son potentiel �lectrique, les
gens y sont tr�s �duqu�s et bons travailleurs. Ici, la population peut
travailler
pour pas cher, disons deux cents DM (4000 FB) par mois.
Ne craignez-vous pas que les multinationales qui prendraient le contr�le
de la Yougoslavie s?arrangent pour payer les salaires les plus bas
possibles
afin d?augmenter leurs profits?
Nenad. Ce serait quand m�me int�ressant pour elles. Et nous garderons le
contr�le.
[Manifestement ces jeunes ont de grandes illusions?Avec le programme
�conomique ultra-lib�ral du G-17, ce � contr�le � sera plut�t limit�?]
Vous attendez que les Etats Unis aident votre pays. Mais ils ont jou� un
grand r�le dans son �clatement. Est-il vrai qu?Otpor - ou en tout cas
ses
dirigeants - est pay� par la CIA via la fondation - �cran National
Endowment for Democracy?
[Notre question semble d�ranger.]
Nenad. Je sais que la CIA est impliqu�e dans toute cette histoire. Ils
ont leur travail � faire et ils sont plus forts que nos propres
services.
Ecoutez-moi, je suis aussi contre les USA, mais nous ne pouvons leur
r�sister, et ils doivent faire leur boulot, alors moi, �a ne me g�ne pas
trop
d?�tre partiellement contr�l� par la CIA.
Tactique...
Pourquoi la CIA a-t-elle entra�n� les cadres d?Otpor pendant dix jours?
Et pourquoi consacre-t-elle tant d?argent � prendre le contr�le d?Otpor
et des autres mouvements d?opposition? Parce que, dans la base de ces
mouvements, on trouve aussi bon nombre de gens honn�tes. Ils ont
beaucoup de reproches � l?�gard de Milosevic et des partis au pouvoir,
mais restent attach�s � l?ind�pendance de la Yougoslavie et ne veulent
pas
qu?elle devienne une colonie.
Amener ces gens o� ils ne veulent pas demande une strat�gie de
manipulation sophistiqu�e. En �t� 99, le chef de la CIA Tennent se
d�pla�ait � Sofia,
en Bulgarie, pour y �former� l?opposition serbe. Le 28 ao�t dernier, la
BBC confirmait qu?une formation sp�ciale de dix jours venait d?�tre
donn�e, �
Sofia �galement, � des militants d?Otpor.
Le programme de la CIA est un programme par phases successives. Dans un
premier temps, on flatte le patriotisme et l?esprit d?ind�pendance
serbes, on fait semblant de les respecter. Mais apr�s avoir sem� la
confusion et bris� l?unit� du pays, la CIA et l?OTAN vont beaucoup plus
loin.
La CIA a d�j� employ� ces tactiques contre de nombreux peuples. Pour
renverser un gouvernement d�rangeant, elle a de l?exp�rience. Au Br�sil
(1961), au Chili (1973), en Bulgarie (1990), on a retrouv� le m�me style
de mouvements pseudo-populaires, orchestr�s avec force dollars. La CIA
est l?ennemi de tous les peuples, elle ne sert que les int�r�ts d?une
poign�e de multinationales et de g�n�raux assassins. Beaucoup de gens
honn�tes
se font avoir par ces manoeuvres. Il est grand temps qu?ils ouvrent les
yeux.
---
>To be partly controlled by the CIA ?
>That doesn't bother me much. �
>
>Interview with two activists of the Otpor student movement
>
>Meeting with two members of Otpor, the student movement of which the
Western
>press speaks so much, describing it as
>� independent. � It was last Aug. 2, in a cafe in Kragujevac...
>
>GERARD MUGEMANGANGO
>& MICHEL COLLON
>
>
>First of all, what is Otpor ? � It's an organization of youths in high
>schools and colleges, � Ivana told us. � No one is older than 27, all
>our members are also members of the Democratic Party (opposition). But
our
>activities are different : actions, shows, distributions of
>propaganda.... �
>
>Above all the difficult life in Serbia seems to affect them most at
present
>: � My father, � Nenad explained, � has owned the same
>automobile for 13 years . He can't afford to buy another. As for me, a
>musician, to earn a living I have to play with certain groups that I
>don't like. And I also have to work in my father's small business. �
>
>Ivana and Nenad seem to expect a lot from the West : � Yugoslavia is a
good
>place to invest : in the center of Europe, with very
>rich mines, the Danube with its electric potential, well-educated
people,
>good workers. Here the people can work for very little, you
>could say for a penny, � Nenad explained.
>
>Wasn't he afraid that the multinations that would take control of
Yugoslavia
>would wind up paying wages as low as possible in
>order to raise their profits ? � It would none-the-less be a good deal
for
>them. And we would keep control. �
>
>Obviously these youths have grand illusions. ... With the ultra-liberal
>[free market] economic program of G17, this � control � will be
>rather limited ...
>
>Now we come to our crucial question. You expect that the United States
will
>aid your country. But it played a big role in breaking it up.
>Is it true that Otpor, or in any case its leaders, are paid by the CIA
>through the front organization called the National Endowment for
>Democracy ?
>
>Apparently our question upset them. � I know, � he ended up saying, �
that
>the CIA is involved in this whole story. They have their
>work to do and they are stronger than our own secret services. �
>
>"Listen to me. I am also against the USA, but we can't resist them, and
they
>have to do their job, while for me, well it doesn't bother me
>that much to be partly controlled by the CIA."
>
>Why did the CIA train Otpor activists for 10 days ?
>
>But why did the CIA devote so much money to take control of Otpor and
the
>other opposition movements? Because in reality, in
>the rank-and-file of these movements, you can find a good number of
honest
>people. They have many complaints with regard to
>Milosevic and the parties in power, but they remain partisans of the
>independence of Yugoslavia and don't want their country to become
>a colony.
>
>To lead these people where they don't want to go demands a
sophisticated
>strategy of manipulation. In the summer of 1999, the
>head of the CIA, George Tennent, set up shop in Sofia, Bulgaria to
"educate"
>the Serb opposition. Last Aug. 28, the BBC confirmed
>that a special 10-day class had been given to the Otpor militants, also
in
>Sofia.
>
>The CIA program is a program in successive phases. Early on, they
flatter
>the Serb's patriotism and spirit of independence, acting
>as if they respect these qualities. But after having sown confusion and
>broken the unity of the country, the CIA and NATO would go
>much further.
>
>The CIA has already employed these tactics against numerous peoples. To
>overturn a government through disruption, it has
>experience. In Brazil (1964), in Chile (1973), in Bulgaria (1990), you
can
>find the same type of pseudo-popular movements, orchestrated
>with the force of the U.S. dollar. The CIA is the enemy of tall the
people.
>It serves the interests of only a handful of multinational
>corporations and murderous generals. It's high time they opened their
eyes.
>
>Anti-Imperialist League -- www.ptb.be/international/indexfr.html
>
>posted 6 October 2000
>
>
>
>International Action Center
>39 West 14th Street, Room 206
>New York, NY 10011
>email: iacenter@...
>web: www.iacenter.org
>CHECK OUT THE NEW SITE www.mumia2000.org
>phone: 212 633-6646
>fax: 212 633-2889
>
>
>
>YUGOSLAVIA IN CRISIS
>
>NO to NATO
>
==
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Una newsletter personale,
un forum web personale,
una mailing list personale, ...?
Gratis sotto
http://www.ecircle.de/ad182549/www.ecircle.it
much "
Fonti:
> http://www.ptb.be/solidaire/article.phtml?lang=1&obid)72
> http://www.iacenter.org/yugo_crisis.htm
---
Interview de deux activistes du mouvement Otpor
�Etre partiellement contr�l� par la CIA? �a
ne me d�range pas trop�
Rencontre avec deux membres d?Otpor, ce
mouvement �tudiant �ind�pendant� dont la presse occidentale
parle tant. C?�tait le 2 ao�t dernier, dans
un caf� de Kragujevac?
G�rard Mugemangango et Michel Collon
Qu?est-ce que le mouvement Otpor?
Ivana. C?est une organisation des jeunes
des facult�s et des �coles sup�rieures. Personne n?y a plus de
27 ans et tous nos adh�rents sont membres
du parti d�mocratique (opposition). Mais nos activit�s sont
diff�rentes: actions, shows, distribution
de propagande, etc.
C?est surtout la vie tr�s difficile en
Serbie qui para�t les affecter?
Nenad. Mon p�re poss�de la m�me voiture
depuis treize ans, il ne peut pas s?en payer d?autre. Quant �
moi, musicien, je suis oblig�, pour gagner
ma vie, de jouer avec certains groupes que je n?aime pas. Et je
suis �galement oblig� de travailler dans la
petite soci�t� de mon p�re.
Ivana et Nenad semblent attendre �norm�ment
de l?Ouest?
Nenad. La Yougoslavie est un bon endroit
pour investir : elle se situe au centre de l?Europe, poss�de des
mines tr�s riches ainsi que le Danube avec son potentiel �lectrique, les
gens y sont tr�s �duqu�s et bons travailleurs. Ici, la population peut
travailler
pour pas cher, disons deux cents DM (4000 FB) par mois.
Ne craignez-vous pas que les multinationales qui prendraient le contr�le
de la Yougoslavie s?arrangent pour payer les salaires les plus bas
possibles
afin d?augmenter leurs profits?
Nenad. Ce serait quand m�me int�ressant pour elles. Et nous garderons le
contr�le.
[Manifestement ces jeunes ont de grandes illusions?Avec le programme
�conomique ultra-lib�ral du G-17, ce � contr�le � sera plut�t limit�?]
Vous attendez que les Etats Unis aident votre pays. Mais ils ont jou� un
grand r�le dans son �clatement. Est-il vrai qu?Otpor - ou en tout cas
ses
dirigeants - est pay� par la CIA via la fondation - �cran National
Endowment for Democracy?
[Notre question semble d�ranger.]
Nenad. Je sais que la CIA est impliqu�e dans toute cette histoire. Ils
ont leur travail � faire et ils sont plus forts que nos propres
services.
Ecoutez-moi, je suis aussi contre les USA, mais nous ne pouvons leur
r�sister, et ils doivent faire leur boulot, alors moi, �a ne me g�ne pas
trop
d?�tre partiellement contr�l� par la CIA.
Tactique...
Pourquoi la CIA a-t-elle entra�n� les cadres d?Otpor pendant dix jours?
Et pourquoi consacre-t-elle tant d?argent � prendre le contr�le d?Otpor
et des autres mouvements d?opposition? Parce que, dans la base de ces
mouvements, on trouve aussi bon nombre de gens honn�tes. Ils ont
beaucoup de reproches � l?�gard de Milosevic et des partis au pouvoir,
mais restent attach�s � l?ind�pendance de la Yougoslavie et ne veulent
pas
qu?elle devienne une colonie.
Amener ces gens o� ils ne veulent pas demande une strat�gie de
manipulation sophistiqu�e. En �t� 99, le chef de la CIA Tennent se
d�pla�ait � Sofia,
en Bulgarie, pour y �former� l?opposition serbe. Le 28 ao�t dernier, la
BBC confirmait qu?une formation sp�ciale de dix jours venait d?�tre
donn�e, �
Sofia �galement, � des militants d?Otpor.
Le programme de la CIA est un programme par phases successives. Dans un
premier temps, on flatte le patriotisme et l?esprit d?ind�pendance
serbes, on fait semblant de les respecter. Mais apr�s avoir sem� la
confusion et bris� l?unit� du pays, la CIA et l?OTAN vont beaucoup plus
loin.
La CIA a d�j� employ� ces tactiques contre de nombreux peuples. Pour
renverser un gouvernement d�rangeant, elle a de l?exp�rience. Au Br�sil
(1961), au Chili (1973), en Bulgarie (1990), on a retrouv� le m�me style
de mouvements pseudo-populaires, orchestr�s avec force dollars. La CIA
est l?ennemi de tous les peuples, elle ne sert que les int�r�ts d?une
poign�e de multinationales et de g�n�raux assassins. Beaucoup de gens
honn�tes
se font avoir par ces manoeuvres. Il est grand temps qu?ils ouvrent les
yeux.
---
>To be partly controlled by the CIA ?
>That doesn't bother me much. �
>
>Interview with two activists of the Otpor student movement
>
>Meeting with two members of Otpor, the student movement of which the
Western
>press speaks so much, describing it as
>� independent. � It was last Aug. 2, in a cafe in Kragujevac...
>
>GERARD MUGEMANGANGO
>& MICHEL COLLON
>
>
>First of all, what is Otpor ? � It's an organization of youths in high
>schools and colleges, � Ivana told us. � No one is older than 27, all
>our members are also members of the Democratic Party (opposition). But
our
>activities are different : actions, shows, distributions of
>propaganda.... �
>
>Above all the difficult life in Serbia seems to affect them most at
present
>: � My father, � Nenad explained, � has owned the same
>automobile for 13 years . He can't afford to buy another. As for me, a
>musician, to earn a living I have to play with certain groups that I
>don't like. And I also have to work in my father's small business. �
>
>Ivana and Nenad seem to expect a lot from the West : � Yugoslavia is a
good
>place to invest : in the center of Europe, with very
>rich mines, the Danube with its electric potential, well-educated
people,
>good workers. Here the people can work for very little, you
>could say for a penny, � Nenad explained.
>
>Wasn't he afraid that the multinations that would take control of
Yugoslavia
>would wind up paying wages as low as possible in
>order to raise their profits ? � It would none-the-less be a good deal
for
>them. And we would keep control. �
>
>Obviously these youths have grand illusions. ... With the ultra-liberal
>[free market] economic program of G17, this � control � will be
>rather limited ...
>
>Now we come to our crucial question. You expect that the United States
will
>aid your country. But it played a big role in breaking it up.
>Is it true that Otpor, or in any case its leaders, are paid by the CIA
>through the front organization called the National Endowment for
>Democracy ?
>
>Apparently our question upset them. � I know, � he ended up saying, �
that
>the CIA is involved in this whole story. They have their
>work to do and they are stronger than our own secret services. �
>
>"Listen to me. I am also against the USA, but we can't resist them, and
they
>have to do their job, while for me, well it doesn't bother me
>that much to be partly controlled by the CIA."
>
>Why did the CIA train Otpor activists for 10 days ?
>
>But why did the CIA devote so much money to take control of Otpor and
the
>other opposition movements? Because in reality, in
>the rank-and-file of these movements, you can find a good number of
honest
>people. They have many complaints with regard to
>Milosevic and the parties in power, but they remain partisans of the
>independence of Yugoslavia and don't want their country to become
>a colony.
>
>To lead these people where they don't want to go demands a
sophisticated
>strategy of manipulation. In the summer of 1999, the
>head of the CIA, George Tennent, set up shop in Sofia, Bulgaria to
"educate"
>the Serb opposition. Last Aug. 28, the BBC confirmed
>that a special 10-day class had been given to the Otpor militants, also
in
>Sofia.
>
>The CIA program is a program in successive phases. Early on, they
flatter
>the Serb's patriotism and spirit of independence, acting
>as if they respect these qualities. But after having sown confusion and
>broken the unity of the country, the CIA and NATO would go
>much further.
>
>The CIA has already employed these tactics against numerous peoples. To
>overturn a government through disruption, it has
>experience. In Brazil (1964), in Chile (1973), in Bulgaria (1990), you
can
>find the same type of pseudo-popular movements, orchestrated
>with the force of the U.S. dollar. The CIA is the enemy of tall the
people.
>It serves the interests of only a handful of multinational
>corporations and murderous generals. It's high time they opened their
eyes.
>
>Anti-Imperialist League -- www.ptb.be/international/indexfr.html
>
>posted 6 October 2000
>
>
>
>International Action Center
>39 West 14th Street, Room 206
>New York, NY 10011
>email: iacenter@...
>web: www.iacenter.org
>CHECK OUT THE NEW SITE www.mumia2000.org
>phone: 212 633-6646
>fax: 212 633-2889
>
>
>
>YUGOSLAVIA IN CRISIS
>
>NO to NATO
>
==
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Una newsletter personale,
un forum web personale,
una mailing list personale, ...?
Gratis sotto
http://www.ecircle.de/ad182549/www.ecircle.it
Subject: Achtung: Veranstaltung mit Olschewski verschoben!
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:42:12 +0200
From: Jug Österr Solibewegg <joesb@...>
To:
<joesb@...>
Malte Olschewski stellt sein neues Buch vor:
Von den Karawanken bis zum Kosovo
Die geheime Geschichte der Kriege in Jugoslawien
Donnerstag, 12. Oktober
19 h
Vorstadtzentrum XV
15., Meiselstr. 46/4
Die Veranstaltung, die ursprünglich für Sonntag, 8.10. angekündigt war,
musste verschoben werden, da das Buch zu diesem Zeitpunkt doch noch
nicht
vorgelegen wäre.
Subject: Deutscher General entlarvt Nato-Propaganda als Lüge
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:39:08 +0200
From: Jug Österr Solibewegg <joesb@...>
To: <joesb@...>
Nachstehend einige Passagen aus einem Interview mit Brigadegeneral a.D.
Heinz Loquai, der, weil er öffentlich den Beweis erbrachte, dass der
"Hufeisenplan" eine Lüge war, seine Position verlor:
"Der Zusammenhang ist eindeutig. Ich habe in der TV-Sendung "Panorama"
von
einem ausführlichen Gespräch im Verteidigungsministerium berichtet, bei
dem
mir mitgeteilt worden war, daß es einen serbischen Operationsplan
Hufeisen
nicht gegeben hat, sondern daß aus einer Beschreibung der Ereignisse von
bundesdeutscher Seite ein Plan gemacht worden ist. Verteidigungsminister
Scharping hatte also während der Krieges die Unwahrheit gesagt. Auf
diese
meine Bemerkung hin hat man einer Vertragsverlängerung, die angestanden
wäre, von seiten des Verteidigungsministeriums nicht zugestimmt. Ein
Pressesprecher des Verteidigungsministers trat auf und meinte, daß sich
Loquai aufgrund seiner öffentlich getätigten Äußerungen selbst
disqualifiziert hat. Es ist grotesk. Denn ich habe die Wahrheit gesagt
und
wurde von demjenigen abgestraft, der die Unwahrheit gesagt hat."
"Die sogenannten Verhandlungen von Rambouillet waren keine
Verhandlungen.
Sie waren ein Versuch, der jugoslawischen Führung ein Diktat unter den
politischen Bedingungen der NATO aufzuerlegen."
"Bereits ein halbes Jahr nach den ersten größeren Anschlägen hatte die
UCK
bereits 40 Prozent des Kosovo unter ihrer Kontrolle. Wenn die Serben mit
ihrem Militär und der Sonderpolizei in beträchtlicher Stärke dieses
Potential wirklich rücksichtslos eingesetzt hätten –- wie man immer
sagte --, dann hätte die UCK diese Geländegewinne nicht machen können."
Das ganze Interview:
http://www.vorstadtzentrum.net/cgi-bin/joesb/news/viewnews.cgi?category=all&id=971129647
********************************************
Jugoslawisch-Österreichische Solidaritätsbewegung (JÖSB)
PF 217, A-1040 Wien, Österreich
Tel/Fax +43 1 924 31 61
Mobil +43 6991 924 31 61
joesb@...
www.vorstadtzentrum.net/joesb
Kto-Nr. 9282, RB Schwechat, BLZ 32823
---
Dann wird der Ärger anfangen
(von Rainer Rupp)
Letzten Dienstag waren die Verteidigungsminister der NATO-Staaten im
britischen Birmingham zu informellen Beratungen über die Lage im Kosovo
nach dem Sturz des jugoslawischen Präsidenten Slobodan Milosevic
zusammen getroffen. Dabei meinte NATO-Generalsekretär Lord Robertson,
es sei noch zu früh zu sagen, welchen Einfluss die Veränderungen in
Belgrad tatsächlich hätten. Lord Robertsons Reserviertheit deutet an,
dass die NATO die neue Regierung in Belgrad noch lange nicht im Griff
hat, wie deren sehr erboste Reaktion auf die amerikanische Haltung
zeigte. Im Unterschied zur EU scheint Washington auch weiterhin auf der
Beibehaltung der Wirtschaftssanktionen gegen Jugoslwien zu bestehen, bis
dass der ehem. Präsident Milosevic als Kriegsverbrecher ans Tribunal
nach Den Haag ausgeliefert ist.
Die rechte Hand des neu gewählten Präsidenten, Vojislav Kostunica,
erinnerte daran dass Kostunica nicht daran denkt, irgend jemand an das
Gericht in Den Haag auszuliefern. Statt dessen betonte Jankovic die
Unabhängigkeit der neuen Regierung in Belgrad: "Wir haben dies (die
Ablösung Milosevics) alleine geschafft und niemandem irgendwelche
Versprechungen gemacht. ... Sie ( die Amerikaner ) verändern jedoch die
Spielregel, nachdem das Spiel begonnen hat." Das würde Belgrad nicht
hinnehmen und er warnte alle, die versuchen sollten, das Gleiche zu
tun.
Im Unterschied zu Washington haben die Europäer Kreide gefressen. Sie
wollen sich die unverhoffte Gelegenheit, bei der Neuordnung des Balkans
die USA aus dem Feld zu drängen und selbst die Führung zu übernehmen, so
leicht nicht entgehen lassen und biedern sich beim Europa-freundlichen
Kostunica regelrecht an. Im Chor mit den anderen EU-Außenministern tönte
auch Herr Joseph Fischer aus Berlin, dass die Auslieferung Milosevics an
Den Haag nicht die oberste Priorität habe. Frankreich, das z.Z. den
EU-Ratsvorsitz hat, schickte bereits am Dienstag seinen Außenminister
Vedrine zur großen Umarmung nach Belgrad.
Unterdessen wächst im Kosovo die Sorge der Gewaltseparatisten, die
Zuneigung der NATO zu Gunsten Jugoslawiens zu verlieren. Gemäß
UNO-Resolution 1244 hätten bereits seit Sommer dieses Jahres
jugoslawische Polizei und Militäreinheiten ins Kosovo zurückkehren
dürfen. Der neue Präsident Kostunica besteht auf Einhaltung der
Resolution. Bisher war das formal am Einspruch des UNMIK-Chefs Bernard
Kouchner gescheitert, hinter dem sich jedoch lediglich die NATO-Politik
versteckt hatte. Nun sind die Karten neu verteilt und auch der
serbophobe Kouchner soll schon bald seinen UNMIK-Posten verlassen.
Selbst die Westmarionette Zoran Djindjic, der in der Kostunica-Regierung
eine einflussreiche Funktion inne hat, erklärte am Dienstag in einem
Interview mit der Belgrader Tageszeitung "Vecernje Novosti", dass "bis
zum Ende des Jahres 1,200 Mann unserer (serbischen) Polizei und unseres
Militärs wieder im Kosovo sind, um dort die Grenze nach Albanien zu
kontrollieren." ("Yugoslav troops will return to Kosovo by year's end:
Djindjic", BELGRADE, Oct 10. 00, AFP) Alle jugoslawischen Versuche,
Polizei oder militärische Einheiten wieder ins Kosovo zurückzubringen,
würden "einen neuen Krieg" entfachen, bei dem sich die NATO zwischen den
Fronten wieder finden würde", warnte der zum Politiker mutierte UCK-Chef
Hashim Thaci.
Auch der als gemäßigt geltende Ibrahim Rugova versucht in Vorbereitung
der Kommunalwahlen im Kosovo am 28. Oktober Wert auf aggressivere Töne
zu legen.
"Kosovo wird den Weg in die Unabhängigkeit gehen" ist mittlerweile die
feste Überzeugung der Kosovo-Separatisten. Das widerspricht der
UNO-Resolution 1244 und auch den politischen Zielsetzungen der
EU-Regierungen, die keinen gefährlichen Präzedenzfall in Europa in Bezug
auf Anerkennung von gewaltsam veränderten Grenzen schaffen wollen.
Während die EU sich zu Zeiten Milosevics in dieser Sache aus taktischen
Gründen eher ambivalent gezeigt hatte, liegt es nahe, dass sie in ihrer
Absicht, die neue Regierung in Belgrad ins EU-Boot zu ziehen, diese
nicht durch die Unterstützung der Unabhängigkeit des Kosovo verärgern
wird.
Gegenüber der britischen Tageszeitung, "The Telegraph" äußerte kürzlich
ein hoher Offizier der NATO-KFOR-Truppe seine Sorge, dass das von der
NATO ursprünglich unterstützte und immer noch bezahlte "Kosovo Schutz
Korps" seine Maske fallen lassen und sich wieder zur alten UCK formieren
könnte, um diesmal die neue Besatzungstruppe zu bekämpfen, nämlich die
NATO.
In Birmingham beschlossen die NATO-Minister trotzdem, den Einsatz im
Kosovo mit z.Z. 36.000 Soldaten fortzuführen.
Bundesverteidigungsminister Rudolf Scharping äußerte die Ansicht, dass
"die Präsenz der internationalen Friedenstruppe und damit auch der
Bundeswehr auf Jahre hinaus erforderlich" sei und begründete dies unter
anderem mit "erheblichen Spannungen, ausgeprägtem Hass und hoher
Gewaltbereitschaft" zwischen den Bevölkerungsgruppen. Daran habe sich
auch nach dem Ende der Herrschaft Milosevics nichts geändert. So könnte
die NATO im Kosovo doch noch ihren Bodenkrieg bekomme, nur nicht gegen
die Serben, sondern gegen die UCK.
"Ich glaube, dass sobald der Westen ein demokratisches Jugoslawien
unterstützt, wir mit dem Kosovo Schutz Korps große Probleme haben
werden", sagte ergänzend der britische KFOR-Offizier. "Im Augenblick
sind sie (die Albaner) alle davon überzeugt, die Unabhängigkeit zu
erhalten. Sobald klar wird, dass das nicht passiert, wird der Ärger
anfangen." Entgegen seinen früheren Andeutungen hat jetzt selbst
UNMIK-Chef Bernard Kouchner öffentlich erklärt, dass die Unabhängigkeit
des Kosovo überhaupt nicht in Frage käme.
Saarburg den 11.10.00
---
Bei Kostuniva beißt Frau Albright auf Eisen
Ein Spaltpilz für die transatlantischen Beziehungen.
(von Rainer Rupp)
Die Außenminister des Europäischen Union trafen sich gestern, um das
Ölembargo und andere Wirtschaftssanktionen gegen Jugoslawien aufzuheben.
Später in der Woche wollen die politischen Führer der EU über die
Freigabe von Finanzhilfe für die neue Regierung in Belgrad im Wert von
etwa 2 Milliarde Euro entscheiden. "Wir wollen tun, was wir versprochen
haben, dass nämlich das serbische Volk so schnell wie möglich wieder in
Europa aufgenommen wird", meinte dazu Chris Patten, EU-Kommissar für
Auswärtige Angelegenheiten. Zugleich übertreffen sich die Staats- und
Regierungschefs der Europäischen Union, dem neuen jugoslawischen
Präsidenten Kostunica mit schmeichlerischen Worten zu gratulieren und
ihn so schnell wie möglich ins europäische Boot zu ziehen. Das scheint
ohne Abstimmung mit dem großen Bruder in Washington zu geschehen, der
erhebliche Vorbehalte gegenüber einem als anti-amerikanisch bekannten
Kostunica zu haben scheint.
Mit einem Seitenhieb in Richtung USA erklärte denn auch EU-Kommissar
Patten: "Ich glaube nicht, dass wir uns bereits jetzt Gedanken darüber
machen sollten, unter welchen Umständen es schwierig werden könnte, mit
Serbien zusammen zu arbeiten. "Halb vorwurfsvoll schrieb deshalb die
Washington Post, dass Die EU fest entschlossen scheint, "die Führung in
der Aussöhnung mit Serbien zu übernehmen." ("EU Leaders Rush to Serbia's
Side", By William Drozdiak, Washington Post Foreign Service, Saturday,
October 7, 2000; Page A19)
Das scheint Washington nicht besonders zu gefallen, obwohl es vorerst
noch gute Mine zum bösen Spiel macht. Die USA hatte gehofft, dass ein
Anführer der mit US-Geldern gefütterten und von Washington geführten
Opposition die Macht in Belgrad übernehmen würde. Für einen solchen
Nachfolger hatte die US-Außenministerin Albright bereits eine
Zwangsjacke bereit, der die neuen Machthaber in Belgrad auf
amerikanische Positionen bezüglich des Kosovo und des Haager
Kriegsverbrecher Tribunals fest gelegt hätte. Bei Präsident Kostuniva
beißt Frau Albright mit ihren Forderungen jedoch - zumindest noch
vorerst - auf Eisen.
"Kostunica ist nicht der Mann der Clinton-Regierung", schrieb Martin
Sieff, der Balkananalytiker von UPI, einen Tag nach der
Präsidentschaftswahl in Jugoslawien. Er weigert sich, Milosevic an das
Haager Tribunal auszuliefern. Die Verstärkung der jugoslawischen
Souveränität über das Kosovo nennt als höchste Priorität. Und
regelmäßig hat er die NATO-Bombardierung Jugoslawiens im letzten Jahr
als Verbrechen bezeichnet. Für Washington stellt Kostunica ein weitaus
komplizierteres Problem dar als dies bisher Milosevic tat, meint Martin
Sieff, denn er hat eine, auch im Westen unbestrittene demokratische
Legitimation, nur sind seine politischen Vorstellungen nicht so, wie es
Frau Albright gerne möchte. Denn Kostunica "ist ein ebenso scharfer
Kritiker der amerikanischen Politik wie es zuvor Milosevic war".
Washington möchte deshalb für alle Fälle gerüstet sein. Das
Repräsentantenhaus des US-Kongresses hatte Montag vor einer Woche noch
flugs ein Gesetz verabschiedet (HR 1064), das weitere $60 Million für
die Stärkung der Demokratie in Serbien zur Verfügung stellt. Wenn man
den Gesetzestext liest, dann wird deutlich, dass die Gelder auch gegen
Kostunica verwendet werden können, wenn der sich nicht der "Pax
Amerikana" bedingungslos unterwirft.
Der außenpolitisch einflussreiche Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE), der
offensichtlich die Meinung der Clinton-Regierung vertrat, als er am 26.
September im Senat zur neuen Gesetzesvorlage (HR 1064), machte deutlich,
dass das Gesetz auch nach der Machtübernahme durch Kostunica solange
seine Geltung nicht verlieren wird, bis Vojislav Kostunica alle
Forderungen Washingtons erfüllt hat, "einschließlich der Auslieferung
aller angeklagten Kriegverbrecher an das Haager Tribunal."
Vorsorglich verurteilte Senator Biden bei dieser Gelegenheit den neuen
jugoslawischen Präsidenten Kostunica als einen "Ultra-Nationalisten".
Der Geist und die sich hinter dem neuen Gesetz versteckende Absicht wird
jedoch erst durch die Schlußbemerkungen von Senator Biden vollständig
klar: "Um kein Blatt vor den Mund zu nehmen: Die Anerkennung von Dayton
und Mitarbeit mit dem Haager Tribunal muß der Lackmustests für jede
demokratische Regierung in Serbien sein. ... Sollte jedoch Kostunica mit
Hilfe seiner lobenswerten demokratischen Legitimation eine aggressive
nationalistisch -serbische Politik verfolgen, dann müssen wir ihn
delegitimieren." Für eine weitere Runde der amerikanischen Einmischung
in die inneren Angelegenheiten Jugoslawiens, diesmal gegen Kostunica,
würden in diesem Fall den amerikanischen Marionetten in Belgrad $60
Millionen zur Verfügung stehen.
Diesmal dürfte es jedoch für Washington nicht so einfach werden, denn
die Europäer scheinen nicht bereit, die Initiative erneut Washington zu
überlassen. Auch daran hat Senator Biden gedacht und gewarnt: "Sollten
unsere europäischen Verbündeten sich jedoch entscheiden, ein
post-Milosevic, demokratisch gewähltes, aber ultra-nationalistisches
Serbien zu umarmen, dann kann ich ihnen nur viel Glück wünschen." Dann -
so drohte Biden den Europäern - würden die USA ausschließlich mit den
anderen ehemaligen Teilrepubliken Jugoslawiens, einschließlich
Montenegros zusammenarbeiten und die Europäer mit Serbien alleine
lassen. Das ist eine Herausforderung, die die Europäer womöglich
annehmen. Sollte sich Kostunika nicht doch noch in Richtung USA
verbiegen lassen, dann muß entweder Washington seine Melodie gegenüber
Belgrad ändert oder es läuft Gefahr, seine Kontrolle über die Neuordnung
des Balkans vollkommen an die Europäer und an Russland zu verlieren.
Darüber könnte es zu erheblichen neuen Spannungen zwischen den USA und
Europa kommen, die wegen der militärischen Implikationen im Kosovo und
in Bosnien sogar die Grundfesten der NATO erschüttern könnten.
Saarburg den 9.10. 00
---
"Er tritt ab, sie treten an, die USA treten nicht in Erscheinung und
schicken Russland vor."
(Von Rainer Rupp)
In Kreisen der jugoslawischen Opposition und in der "Internationalen
Gemeinschaft", wie sich die NATO gerne selbst bezeichnet, herrscht nach
wie vor Verwirrung über die Haltung Moskaus, das sich im großen
Balkan-Spiel der NATO immer noch etwas quer legt. In einer Rede an der
Princeton University in New Jersey sagte US-Präsident Clinton: "Wir
hoffen, dass die Russen sich in die internationale Gemeinschaft einfügen
und Kostunica als neuen Präsidenten anerkennen." ("US backs Yugoslav
protesters, seeks Russian help", Reuters 10/06/2000 01:03:00 ET)
Deshalb muß Russland wieder ganz zurück ins NATO-Boot geholt werden.
"Es gibt Pläne für ein Treffen der Jugoslawien Kontaktgruppe für Ende
dieser Woche" , erklärte ein hoher US-Beamter gestern in Washington.
Dabei sollen unter Teilnahme Russlands "Ideen ausgetauscht und
synchronisiert" werden. ("Balkan Contact Group Meeting Expected This
Week", Reuters, WASHINGTON, Oct 5, 2000)
Trotz vollmundiger, von Kanzler Schröder zur Beruhigung der Deutschen
verkündeter Übereinstimmung mit Präsident Putin, hat es sich die
russische Seite bisher schwer getan, der NATO bei der Unterstützung der
Opposition in Belgrad zu folgen. Präsident Putin hat den von der
Opposition selbsterklärten Wahlsieg bisher nicht anerkannt. Am 3.
Oktober unterstützte das russische Außenministerium vielmehr die
Position Milosevics, indem es erklärte, daß erst eine zweite Wahlrunde
die Entscheidung über den rechtmäßig gewählten neuen Präsidenten bringen
könnte. Zugleich bot Russland an, zwischen Kostunica und Milosevic im
Interesse des inneren Friedens in Jugoslawien zu vermitteln. ("Russia
Backs Milosevic's Claim to Second-Round Vote", Bloomberg News, Moscow,
3. Oct.) Dieses Angebot haben sowohl Milosevic als auch Kostunica
abgelehnt.
Auch in Russland weiß man, dass allein Washington die jugoslawische
Opposition bisher mit 75 Millionen Dollar unterstützt hat. Jene in der
Opposition, die wie Zoran Djinjic fleißig die Hand aufgehalten, Küßchen
mit Albright austauschen und mit prinzipienlosen grünen Machtmenschen
wie Joschka Fischer konferiert haben, hatten als
Präsidentschaftskandidaten beim jugoslawischen Volk keine Chance, obwohl
viele Menschen sich durch Präsident Milosevic längst nicht mehr
repräsentiert fanden. Wie überall nach langen Perioden ungebrochener
Herrschaft so zeigte auch das System Milosevic nach 13 Jahren große
Verschleißerscheinungen.
Trotzdem lavierte die zerstrittene Opposition von NATO-Marionetten in
Belgrad über ein Jahr weitgehend ohne Erfolg. Erst im letzten
Augenblick fanden und einigten sie sich auf Vojislav Kostunica, einen
als Saubermann und strammen Nationalisten bekannten Politiker, den sie
dazu drängten, bei den Präsidentschaftswahlen gegen seinen alten Feind
Milosevic anzutreten. Allerdings kann Kostunica, der auf Grund seiner
betont anti-amerikanischen Haltung und seiner unverhohlenen Kritik am
NATO-Angriff schnell in der Wählergunst stieg, lediglich als Strohmann
gesehen werden, hinter dem sich die Belgrader NATO-Marionetten vorerst
versteckt halten. Die Tatsache allerdings, dass ausgerechnet Zoran
Djinjic der Wahlkampfmanager von Kostunica ist, spricht für sich.
Kostunicas kleine Partei, sie hatte bei der letzten Wahl um die 5%, ist
personell überhaupt nicht fähig, auch nur einen Teil der wichtigen
politischen Posten zu besetzen, so dass sich die Opposition und die NATO
gute Chancen ausrechnen können, bei einer Machtübernahme von Kostunica
schon bald in Belgrad die Weichen zu stellen, und nach einer
Übergangszeit dort ganz den Ton anzugeben. Um diesem Vorhaben nicht zu
schaden, müssen sich die NATO-Herrscher jedoch zurückhalten. DAVID E.
SANGER, der diplomatische Korrespondent der New York Times brachte
gestern in Washington die vorläufige US-Planung für Jugoslawien auf den
folgen kurzen Nenner: "Er (Milosevic) tritt ab, Sie (die Führer der
Opposition) treten an, und die USA treten nicht in Erscheinung.("He
Stepps Down, They Step Up, U.S. Lies Low", By DAVID E. SANGER, NYT,
6.10.00) Denn nach wie vor besteht die Gefahr, dass bei einer zu
offensichtlicher NATO-Unterstützung für Kostunica die Mehrheit des
jugoslawischen Volkes den Braten riechen könnten und die weitere
Entwicklung in Belgrad nicht nach NATO-Vorstellungen abläuft. Die große
Unbekannte ist nach wie vor die russische Haltung.
"Wenige zweifeln daran, dass die russische politische Elite früher oder
später den Sieger in Belgrad anerkennen wird", schreibt der
oppositionelle Jelica, ein Mitarbeiter des Institutes für Internationale
Politik und Wirtschaft in Belgrade im Bericht Nr. 181 vom 5. Oktober
2000 des von der britischen Regierung unterstützten "Institut for War an
Peace Reporting". Zugleich gibt Kurjak der NATO einen guten Rat, wie
sie es anstellen muß, damit Moskau auch den "richtigen" Sieger
anerkennt. Er weist darauf hin , daß Moskau auf $22.5 Mrd. vom
Internationalen Währungsfond und der Weltbank wartet. Bisher seien
lediglich $2.7 Mrd. ausgezahlt worden und dass Russland nicht länger
warten könne, weshalb er empfiehlt: "Nur pragmatische Interessen - in
Form finanzieller Erpressung durch den Westen - wird die Russen dazu
bringen, Mitverantwortung zu übernehmen um sicher zu stellen, dass
diesmal der Richtige gewinnt."
Daß Kostunica der Richtige ist, das steht für die "humanitären"
Militaristen der NATO trotz seiner dezidiert anti-amerikanischen Haltung
längst fest. "Was jetzt wichtig ist, ist daß Kostunika als Präsident
anerkannt wird" sorgte sich gestern Frau Madeleine Albright auf dem
Rückflug von ihrer verpfuschten Nahost-Friedenskonferenz in Ägypten. Und
Präsident Clinton freute sich im Rosengarten des Weißen Hauses darauf,
das serbische Volk "in der Demokratie, in Europa und in der
Weltgemeinschaft wieder aufzunehmen. Und dann werden wir so schnell wie
möglich die Sanktionen aufheben."
Warum es tatsächlich geht, schreibt die New York Times in ihrer
gestrigen Ausgabe: "Das hätte den Zufluß von amerikanischen und
internationalen Finanzmitteln nach Serbien zur Folge und würde
Investoren erlauben, die am Boden liegende Wirtschaft wieder
aufzubauen", womit natürlich die "Privatisierung" der volkseigenen
Betriebe gemeint ist. Denn nur so kann das neue Jugoslawien in die Neue
Weltordnung eingebettet werden. Daß das manchmal nicht ganz so fugenlos
passiert wie geplant zeigt der ebenfalls vom Westen eingefädelte Sturz
des indonesischen Diktators Suharto 1998. Er war zwar vom Westen über
Hundert Tausende von Leichen an die Macht gebracht worden, aber als er
und sein korruptes Regime sich in die veränderten Bedingungen der Neuen
Weltordnung nicht mehr einfügen wollten, musste er gehen. Seither
schlittert Indonesien immer tiefer in ein wirtschaftliches und
politisches Chaos.
"Ich hoffe es endet so wie im Rest von Osteuropa und daß sie (die
Jugoslawen) endlich vom Kommunismus befreit sind", meinte die
Erretterin der Menschheit von allem Bösen auf ihrem Rückflug von Kairo.
Unbeabsichtigt gab damit Frau Albright den waren Grund für den
hauptsächlich von ihr betriebenen Angriff auf Jugoslawien bekannt. Und
als wäre er ihr Echo ergänzte gestern in Deutschland Frau Albrights
fleißigster Schüler, der vom Steine zum Bomben werfen mutierte Joschka
Fischer: "Heute ist in Serbien das letzte Stück des Eisernen Vorhangs
gefallen. " Und schon wird an der Mär gesponnen, dass das serbische Volk
der NATO doch eigentlich für die Bombardierung dankbar sein müsste.
Schließlich hat die NATO sie dadurch vom Kommunismus befreit und gibt
ihnen nun die Chance, vom westlichen Großkapital bis auf die Knochen
ausgesaugt zu werden. Frau Albright hat selbst auf die Entwicklung in
Osteuropa seit 1990 hingewiesen. Dort hat eine seit Jahrzehnten nicht
mehr gekannte Armut und Verelendung statt gefunden. Allerdings hat dort
jetzt jeder die Freiheit, zum Shoppen nach London oder New York zu
jetten.
Saarburg den 6. 10. 2000
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:42:12 +0200
From: Jug Österr Solibewegg <joesb@...>
To:
<joesb@...>
Malte Olschewski stellt sein neues Buch vor:
Von den Karawanken bis zum Kosovo
Die geheime Geschichte der Kriege in Jugoslawien
Donnerstag, 12. Oktober
19 h
Vorstadtzentrum XV
15., Meiselstr. 46/4
Die Veranstaltung, die ursprünglich für Sonntag, 8.10. angekündigt war,
musste verschoben werden, da das Buch zu diesem Zeitpunkt doch noch
nicht
vorgelegen wäre.
Subject: Deutscher General entlarvt Nato-Propaganda als Lüge
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:39:08 +0200
From: Jug Österr Solibewegg <joesb@...>
To: <joesb@...>
Nachstehend einige Passagen aus einem Interview mit Brigadegeneral a.D.
Heinz Loquai, der, weil er öffentlich den Beweis erbrachte, dass der
"Hufeisenplan" eine Lüge war, seine Position verlor:
"Der Zusammenhang ist eindeutig. Ich habe in der TV-Sendung "Panorama"
von
einem ausführlichen Gespräch im Verteidigungsministerium berichtet, bei
dem
mir mitgeteilt worden war, daß es einen serbischen Operationsplan
Hufeisen
nicht gegeben hat, sondern daß aus einer Beschreibung der Ereignisse von
bundesdeutscher Seite ein Plan gemacht worden ist. Verteidigungsminister
Scharping hatte also während der Krieges die Unwahrheit gesagt. Auf
diese
meine Bemerkung hin hat man einer Vertragsverlängerung, die angestanden
wäre, von seiten des Verteidigungsministeriums nicht zugestimmt. Ein
Pressesprecher des Verteidigungsministers trat auf und meinte, daß sich
Loquai aufgrund seiner öffentlich getätigten Äußerungen selbst
disqualifiziert hat. Es ist grotesk. Denn ich habe die Wahrheit gesagt
und
wurde von demjenigen abgestraft, der die Unwahrheit gesagt hat."
"Die sogenannten Verhandlungen von Rambouillet waren keine
Verhandlungen.
Sie waren ein Versuch, der jugoslawischen Führung ein Diktat unter den
politischen Bedingungen der NATO aufzuerlegen."
"Bereits ein halbes Jahr nach den ersten größeren Anschlägen hatte die
UCK
bereits 40 Prozent des Kosovo unter ihrer Kontrolle. Wenn die Serben mit
ihrem Militär und der Sonderpolizei in beträchtlicher Stärke dieses
Potential wirklich rücksichtslos eingesetzt hätten –- wie man immer
sagte --, dann hätte die UCK diese Geländegewinne nicht machen können."
Das ganze Interview:
http://www.vorstadtzentrum.net/cgi-bin/joesb/news/viewnews.cgi?category=all&id=971129647
********************************************
Jugoslawisch-Österreichische Solidaritätsbewegung (JÖSB)
PF 217, A-1040 Wien, Österreich
Tel/Fax +43 1 924 31 61
Mobil +43 6991 924 31 61
joesb@...
www.vorstadtzentrum.net/joesb
Kto-Nr. 9282, RB Schwechat, BLZ 32823
---
Dann wird der Ärger anfangen
(von Rainer Rupp)
Letzten Dienstag waren die Verteidigungsminister der NATO-Staaten im
britischen Birmingham zu informellen Beratungen über die Lage im Kosovo
nach dem Sturz des jugoslawischen Präsidenten Slobodan Milosevic
zusammen getroffen. Dabei meinte NATO-Generalsekretär Lord Robertson,
es sei noch zu früh zu sagen, welchen Einfluss die Veränderungen in
Belgrad tatsächlich hätten. Lord Robertsons Reserviertheit deutet an,
dass die NATO die neue Regierung in Belgrad noch lange nicht im Griff
hat, wie deren sehr erboste Reaktion auf die amerikanische Haltung
zeigte. Im Unterschied zur EU scheint Washington auch weiterhin auf der
Beibehaltung der Wirtschaftssanktionen gegen Jugoslwien zu bestehen, bis
dass der ehem. Präsident Milosevic als Kriegsverbrecher ans Tribunal
nach Den Haag ausgeliefert ist.
Die rechte Hand des neu gewählten Präsidenten, Vojislav Kostunica,
erinnerte daran dass Kostunica nicht daran denkt, irgend jemand an das
Gericht in Den Haag auszuliefern. Statt dessen betonte Jankovic die
Unabhängigkeit der neuen Regierung in Belgrad: "Wir haben dies (die
Ablösung Milosevics) alleine geschafft und niemandem irgendwelche
Versprechungen gemacht. ... Sie ( die Amerikaner ) verändern jedoch die
Spielregel, nachdem das Spiel begonnen hat." Das würde Belgrad nicht
hinnehmen und er warnte alle, die versuchen sollten, das Gleiche zu
tun.
Im Unterschied zu Washington haben die Europäer Kreide gefressen. Sie
wollen sich die unverhoffte Gelegenheit, bei der Neuordnung des Balkans
die USA aus dem Feld zu drängen und selbst die Führung zu übernehmen, so
leicht nicht entgehen lassen und biedern sich beim Europa-freundlichen
Kostunica regelrecht an. Im Chor mit den anderen EU-Außenministern tönte
auch Herr Joseph Fischer aus Berlin, dass die Auslieferung Milosevics an
Den Haag nicht die oberste Priorität habe. Frankreich, das z.Z. den
EU-Ratsvorsitz hat, schickte bereits am Dienstag seinen Außenminister
Vedrine zur großen Umarmung nach Belgrad.
Unterdessen wächst im Kosovo die Sorge der Gewaltseparatisten, die
Zuneigung der NATO zu Gunsten Jugoslawiens zu verlieren. Gemäß
UNO-Resolution 1244 hätten bereits seit Sommer dieses Jahres
jugoslawische Polizei und Militäreinheiten ins Kosovo zurückkehren
dürfen. Der neue Präsident Kostunica besteht auf Einhaltung der
Resolution. Bisher war das formal am Einspruch des UNMIK-Chefs Bernard
Kouchner gescheitert, hinter dem sich jedoch lediglich die NATO-Politik
versteckt hatte. Nun sind die Karten neu verteilt und auch der
serbophobe Kouchner soll schon bald seinen UNMIK-Posten verlassen.
Selbst die Westmarionette Zoran Djindjic, der in der Kostunica-Regierung
eine einflussreiche Funktion inne hat, erklärte am Dienstag in einem
Interview mit der Belgrader Tageszeitung "Vecernje Novosti", dass "bis
zum Ende des Jahres 1,200 Mann unserer (serbischen) Polizei und unseres
Militärs wieder im Kosovo sind, um dort die Grenze nach Albanien zu
kontrollieren." ("Yugoslav troops will return to Kosovo by year's end:
Djindjic", BELGRADE, Oct 10. 00, AFP) Alle jugoslawischen Versuche,
Polizei oder militärische Einheiten wieder ins Kosovo zurückzubringen,
würden "einen neuen Krieg" entfachen, bei dem sich die NATO zwischen den
Fronten wieder finden würde", warnte der zum Politiker mutierte UCK-Chef
Hashim Thaci.
Auch der als gemäßigt geltende Ibrahim Rugova versucht in Vorbereitung
der Kommunalwahlen im Kosovo am 28. Oktober Wert auf aggressivere Töne
zu legen.
"Kosovo wird den Weg in die Unabhängigkeit gehen" ist mittlerweile die
feste Überzeugung der Kosovo-Separatisten. Das widerspricht der
UNO-Resolution 1244 und auch den politischen Zielsetzungen der
EU-Regierungen, die keinen gefährlichen Präzedenzfall in Europa in Bezug
auf Anerkennung von gewaltsam veränderten Grenzen schaffen wollen.
Während die EU sich zu Zeiten Milosevics in dieser Sache aus taktischen
Gründen eher ambivalent gezeigt hatte, liegt es nahe, dass sie in ihrer
Absicht, die neue Regierung in Belgrad ins EU-Boot zu ziehen, diese
nicht durch die Unterstützung der Unabhängigkeit des Kosovo verärgern
wird.
Gegenüber der britischen Tageszeitung, "The Telegraph" äußerte kürzlich
ein hoher Offizier der NATO-KFOR-Truppe seine Sorge, dass das von der
NATO ursprünglich unterstützte und immer noch bezahlte "Kosovo Schutz
Korps" seine Maske fallen lassen und sich wieder zur alten UCK formieren
könnte, um diesmal die neue Besatzungstruppe zu bekämpfen, nämlich die
NATO.
In Birmingham beschlossen die NATO-Minister trotzdem, den Einsatz im
Kosovo mit z.Z. 36.000 Soldaten fortzuführen.
Bundesverteidigungsminister Rudolf Scharping äußerte die Ansicht, dass
"die Präsenz der internationalen Friedenstruppe und damit auch der
Bundeswehr auf Jahre hinaus erforderlich" sei und begründete dies unter
anderem mit "erheblichen Spannungen, ausgeprägtem Hass und hoher
Gewaltbereitschaft" zwischen den Bevölkerungsgruppen. Daran habe sich
auch nach dem Ende der Herrschaft Milosevics nichts geändert. So könnte
die NATO im Kosovo doch noch ihren Bodenkrieg bekomme, nur nicht gegen
die Serben, sondern gegen die UCK.
"Ich glaube, dass sobald der Westen ein demokratisches Jugoslawien
unterstützt, wir mit dem Kosovo Schutz Korps große Probleme haben
werden", sagte ergänzend der britische KFOR-Offizier. "Im Augenblick
sind sie (die Albaner) alle davon überzeugt, die Unabhängigkeit zu
erhalten. Sobald klar wird, dass das nicht passiert, wird der Ärger
anfangen." Entgegen seinen früheren Andeutungen hat jetzt selbst
UNMIK-Chef Bernard Kouchner öffentlich erklärt, dass die Unabhängigkeit
des Kosovo überhaupt nicht in Frage käme.
Saarburg den 11.10.00
---
Bei Kostuniva beißt Frau Albright auf Eisen
Ein Spaltpilz für die transatlantischen Beziehungen.
(von Rainer Rupp)
Die Außenminister des Europäischen Union trafen sich gestern, um das
Ölembargo und andere Wirtschaftssanktionen gegen Jugoslawien aufzuheben.
Später in der Woche wollen die politischen Führer der EU über die
Freigabe von Finanzhilfe für die neue Regierung in Belgrad im Wert von
etwa 2 Milliarde Euro entscheiden. "Wir wollen tun, was wir versprochen
haben, dass nämlich das serbische Volk so schnell wie möglich wieder in
Europa aufgenommen wird", meinte dazu Chris Patten, EU-Kommissar für
Auswärtige Angelegenheiten. Zugleich übertreffen sich die Staats- und
Regierungschefs der Europäischen Union, dem neuen jugoslawischen
Präsidenten Kostunica mit schmeichlerischen Worten zu gratulieren und
ihn so schnell wie möglich ins europäische Boot zu ziehen. Das scheint
ohne Abstimmung mit dem großen Bruder in Washington zu geschehen, der
erhebliche Vorbehalte gegenüber einem als anti-amerikanisch bekannten
Kostunica zu haben scheint.
Mit einem Seitenhieb in Richtung USA erklärte denn auch EU-Kommissar
Patten: "Ich glaube nicht, dass wir uns bereits jetzt Gedanken darüber
machen sollten, unter welchen Umständen es schwierig werden könnte, mit
Serbien zusammen zu arbeiten. "Halb vorwurfsvoll schrieb deshalb die
Washington Post, dass Die EU fest entschlossen scheint, "die Führung in
der Aussöhnung mit Serbien zu übernehmen." ("EU Leaders Rush to Serbia's
Side", By William Drozdiak, Washington Post Foreign Service, Saturday,
October 7, 2000; Page A19)
Das scheint Washington nicht besonders zu gefallen, obwohl es vorerst
noch gute Mine zum bösen Spiel macht. Die USA hatte gehofft, dass ein
Anführer der mit US-Geldern gefütterten und von Washington geführten
Opposition die Macht in Belgrad übernehmen würde. Für einen solchen
Nachfolger hatte die US-Außenministerin Albright bereits eine
Zwangsjacke bereit, der die neuen Machthaber in Belgrad auf
amerikanische Positionen bezüglich des Kosovo und des Haager
Kriegsverbrecher Tribunals fest gelegt hätte. Bei Präsident Kostuniva
beißt Frau Albright mit ihren Forderungen jedoch - zumindest noch
vorerst - auf Eisen.
"Kostunica ist nicht der Mann der Clinton-Regierung", schrieb Martin
Sieff, der Balkananalytiker von UPI, einen Tag nach der
Präsidentschaftswahl in Jugoslawien. Er weigert sich, Milosevic an das
Haager Tribunal auszuliefern. Die Verstärkung der jugoslawischen
Souveränität über das Kosovo nennt als höchste Priorität. Und
regelmäßig hat er die NATO-Bombardierung Jugoslawiens im letzten Jahr
als Verbrechen bezeichnet. Für Washington stellt Kostunica ein weitaus
komplizierteres Problem dar als dies bisher Milosevic tat, meint Martin
Sieff, denn er hat eine, auch im Westen unbestrittene demokratische
Legitimation, nur sind seine politischen Vorstellungen nicht so, wie es
Frau Albright gerne möchte. Denn Kostunica "ist ein ebenso scharfer
Kritiker der amerikanischen Politik wie es zuvor Milosevic war".
Washington möchte deshalb für alle Fälle gerüstet sein. Das
Repräsentantenhaus des US-Kongresses hatte Montag vor einer Woche noch
flugs ein Gesetz verabschiedet (HR 1064), das weitere $60 Million für
die Stärkung der Demokratie in Serbien zur Verfügung stellt. Wenn man
den Gesetzestext liest, dann wird deutlich, dass die Gelder auch gegen
Kostunica verwendet werden können, wenn der sich nicht der "Pax
Amerikana" bedingungslos unterwirft.
Der außenpolitisch einflussreiche Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE), der
offensichtlich die Meinung der Clinton-Regierung vertrat, als er am 26.
September im Senat zur neuen Gesetzesvorlage (HR 1064), machte deutlich,
dass das Gesetz auch nach der Machtübernahme durch Kostunica solange
seine Geltung nicht verlieren wird, bis Vojislav Kostunica alle
Forderungen Washingtons erfüllt hat, "einschließlich der Auslieferung
aller angeklagten Kriegverbrecher an das Haager Tribunal."
Vorsorglich verurteilte Senator Biden bei dieser Gelegenheit den neuen
jugoslawischen Präsidenten Kostunica als einen "Ultra-Nationalisten".
Der Geist und die sich hinter dem neuen Gesetz versteckende Absicht wird
jedoch erst durch die Schlußbemerkungen von Senator Biden vollständig
klar: "Um kein Blatt vor den Mund zu nehmen: Die Anerkennung von Dayton
und Mitarbeit mit dem Haager Tribunal muß der Lackmustests für jede
demokratische Regierung in Serbien sein. ... Sollte jedoch Kostunica mit
Hilfe seiner lobenswerten demokratischen Legitimation eine aggressive
nationalistisch -serbische Politik verfolgen, dann müssen wir ihn
delegitimieren." Für eine weitere Runde der amerikanischen Einmischung
in die inneren Angelegenheiten Jugoslawiens, diesmal gegen Kostunica,
würden in diesem Fall den amerikanischen Marionetten in Belgrad $60
Millionen zur Verfügung stehen.
Diesmal dürfte es jedoch für Washington nicht so einfach werden, denn
die Europäer scheinen nicht bereit, die Initiative erneut Washington zu
überlassen. Auch daran hat Senator Biden gedacht und gewarnt: "Sollten
unsere europäischen Verbündeten sich jedoch entscheiden, ein
post-Milosevic, demokratisch gewähltes, aber ultra-nationalistisches
Serbien zu umarmen, dann kann ich ihnen nur viel Glück wünschen." Dann -
so drohte Biden den Europäern - würden die USA ausschließlich mit den
anderen ehemaligen Teilrepubliken Jugoslawiens, einschließlich
Montenegros zusammenarbeiten und die Europäer mit Serbien alleine
lassen. Das ist eine Herausforderung, die die Europäer womöglich
annehmen. Sollte sich Kostunika nicht doch noch in Richtung USA
verbiegen lassen, dann muß entweder Washington seine Melodie gegenüber
Belgrad ändert oder es läuft Gefahr, seine Kontrolle über die Neuordnung
des Balkans vollkommen an die Europäer und an Russland zu verlieren.
Darüber könnte es zu erheblichen neuen Spannungen zwischen den USA und
Europa kommen, die wegen der militärischen Implikationen im Kosovo und
in Bosnien sogar die Grundfesten der NATO erschüttern könnten.
Saarburg den 9.10. 00
---
"Er tritt ab, sie treten an, die USA treten nicht in Erscheinung und
schicken Russland vor."
(Von Rainer Rupp)
In Kreisen der jugoslawischen Opposition und in der "Internationalen
Gemeinschaft", wie sich die NATO gerne selbst bezeichnet, herrscht nach
wie vor Verwirrung über die Haltung Moskaus, das sich im großen
Balkan-Spiel der NATO immer noch etwas quer legt. In einer Rede an der
Princeton University in New Jersey sagte US-Präsident Clinton: "Wir
hoffen, dass die Russen sich in die internationale Gemeinschaft einfügen
und Kostunica als neuen Präsidenten anerkennen." ("US backs Yugoslav
protesters, seeks Russian help", Reuters 10/06/2000 01:03:00 ET)
Deshalb muß Russland wieder ganz zurück ins NATO-Boot geholt werden.
"Es gibt Pläne für ein Treffen der Jugoslawien Kontaktgruppe für Ende
dieser Woche" , erklärte ein hoher US-Beamter gestern in Washington.
Dabei sollen unter Teilnahme Russlands "Ideen ausgetauscht und
synchronisiert" werden. ("Balkan Contact Group Meeting Expected This
Week", Reuters, WASHINGTON, Oct 5, 2000)
Trotz vollmundiger, von Kanzler Schröder zur Beruhigung der Deutschen
verkündeter Übereinstimmung mit Präsident Putin, hat es sich die
russische Seite bisher schwer getan, der NATO bei der Unterstützung der
Opposition in Belgrad zu folgen. Präsident Putin hat den von der
Opposition selbsterklärten Wahlsieg bisher nicht anerkannt. Am 3.
Oktober unterstützte das russische Außenministerium vielmehr die
Position Milosevics, indem es erklärte, daß erst eine zweite Wahlrunde
die Entscheidung über den rechtmäßig gewählten neuen Präsidenten bringen
könnte. Zugleich bot Russland an, zwischen Kostunica und Milosevic im
Interesse des inneren Friedens in Jugoslawien zu vermitteln. ("Russia
Backs Milosevic's Claim to Second-Round Vote", Bloomberg News, Moscow,
3. Oct.) Dieses Angebot haben sowohl Milosevic als auch Kostunica
abgelehnt.
Auch in Russland weiß man, dass allein Washington die jugoslawische
Opposition bisher mit 75 Millionen Dollar unterstützt hat. Jene in der
Opposition, die wie Zoran Djinjic fleißig die Hand aufgehalten, Küßchen
mit Albright austauschen und mit prinzipienlosen grünen Machtmenschen
wie Joschka Fischer konferiert haben, hatten als
Präsidentschaftskandidaten beim jugoslawischen Volk keine Chance, obwohl
viele Menschen sich durch Präsident Milosevic längst nicht mehr
repräsentiert fanden. Wie überall nach langen Perioden ungebrochener
Herrschaft so zeigte auch das System Milosevic nach 13 Jahren große
Verschleißerscheinungen.
Trotzdem lavierte die zerstrittene Opposition von NATO-Marionetten in
Belgrad über ein Jahr weitgehend ohne Erfolg. Erst im letzten
Augenblick fanden und einigten sie sich auf Vojislav Kostunica, einen
als Saubermann und strammen Nationalisten bekannten Politiker, den sie
dazu drängten, bei den Präsidentschaftswahlen gegen seinen alten Feind
Milosevic anzutreten. Allerdings kann Kostunica, der auf Grund seiner
betont anti-amerikanischen Haltung und seiner unverhohlenen Kritik am
NATO-Angriff schnell in der Wählergunst stieg, lediglich als Strohmann
gesehen werden, hinter dem sich die Belgrader NATO-Marionetten vorerst
versteckt halten. Die Tatsache allerdings, dass ausgerechnet Zoran
Djinjic der Wahlkampfmanager von Kostunica ist, spricht für sich.
Kostunicas kleine Partei, sie hatte bei der letzten Wahl um die 5%, ist
personell überhaupt nicht fähig, auch nur einen Teil der wichtigen
politischen Posten zu besetzen, so dass sich die Opposition und die NATO
gute Chancen ausrechnen können, bei einer Machtübernahme von Kostunica
schon bald in Belgrad die Weichen zu stellen, und nach einer
Übergangszeit dort ganz den Ton anzugeben. Um diesem Vorhaben nicht zu
schaden, müssen sich die NATO-Herrscher jedoch zurückhalten. DAVID E.
SANGER, der diplomatische Korrespondent der New York Times brachte
gestern in Washington die vorläufige US-Planung für Jugoslawien auf den
folgen kurzen Nenner: "Er (Milosevic) tritt ab, Sie (die Führer der
Opposition) treten an, und die USA treten nicht in Erscheinung.("He
Stepps Down, They Step Up, U.S. Lies Low", By DAVID E. SANGER, NYT,
6.10.00) Denn nach wie vor besteht die Gefahr, dass bei einer zu
offensichtlicher NATO-Unterstützung für Kostunica die Mehrheit des
jugoslawischen Volkes den Braten riechen könnten und die weitere
Entwicklung in Belgrad nicht nach NATO-Vorstellungen abläuft. Die große
Unbekannte ist nach wie vor die russische Haltung.
"Wenige zweifeln daran, dass die russische politische Elite früher oder
später den Sieger in Belgrad anerkennen wird", schreibt der
oppositionelle Jelica, ein Mitarbeiter des Institutes für Internationale
Politik und Wirtschaft in Belgrade im Bericht Nr. 181 vom 5. Oktober
2000 des von der britischen Regierung unterstützten "Institut for War an
Peace Reporting". Zugleich gibt Kurjak der NATO einen guten Rat, wie
sie es anstellen muß, damit Moskau auch den "richtigen" Sieger
anerkennt. Er weist darauf hin , daß Moskau auf $22.5 Mrd. vom
Internationalen Währungsfond und der Weltbank wartet. Bisher seien
lediglich $2.7 Mrd. ausgezahlt worden und dass Russland nicht länger
warten könne, weshalb er empfiehlt: "Nur pragmatische Interessen - in
Form finanzieller Erpressung durch den Westen - wird die Russen dazu
bringen, Mitverantwortung zu übernehmen um sicher zu stellen, dass
diesmal der Richtige gewinnt."
Daß Kostunica der Richtige ist, das steht für die "humanitären"
Militaristen der NATO trotz seiner dezidiert anti-amerikanischen Haltung
längst fest. "Was jetzt wichtig ist, ist daß Kostunika als Präsident
anerkannt wird" sorgte sich gestern Frau Madeleine Albright auf dem
Rückflug von ihrer verpfuschten Nahost-Friedenskonferenz in Ägypten. Und
Präsident Clinton freute sich im Rosengarten des Weißen Hauses darauf,
das serbische Volk "in der Demokratie, in Europa und in der
Weltgemeinschaft wieder aufzunehmen. Und dann werden wir so schnell wie
möglich die Sanktionen aufheben."
Warum es tatsächlich geht, schreibt die New York Times in ihrer
gestrigen Ausgabe: "Das hätte den Zufluß von amerikanischen und
internationalen Finanzmitteln nach Serbien zur Folge und würde
Investoren erlauben, die am Boden liegende Wirtschaft wieder
aufzubauen", womit natürlich die "Privatisierung" der volkseigenen
Betriebe gemeint ist. Denn nur so kann das neue Jugoslawien in die Neue
Weltordnung eingebettet werden. Daß das manchmal nicht ganz so fugenlos
passiert wie geplant zeigt der ebenfalls vom Westen eingefädelte Sturz
des indonesischen Diktators Suharto 1998. Er war zwar vom Westen über
Hundert Tausende von Leichen an die Macht gebracht worden, aber als er
und sein korruptes Regime sich in die veränderten Bedingungen der Neuen
Weltordnung nicht mehr einfügen wollten, musste er gehen. Seither
schlittert Indonesien immer tiefer in ein wirtschaftliches und
politisches Chaos.
"Ich hoffe es endet so wie im Rest von Osteuropa und daß sie (die
Jugoslawen) endlich vom Kommunismus befreit sind", meinte die
Erretterin der Menschheit von allem Bösen auf ihrem Rückflug von Kairo.
Unbeabsichtigt gab damit Frau Albright den waren Grund für den
hauptsächlich von ihr betriebenen Angriff auf Jugoslawien bekannt. Und
als wäre er ihr Echo ergänzte gestern in Deutschland Frau Albrights
fleißigster Schüler, der vom Steine zum Bomben werfen mutierte Joschka
Fischer: "Heute ist in Serbien das letzte Stück des Eisernen Vorhangs
gefallen. " Und schon wird an der Mär gesponnen, dass das serbische Volk
der NATO doch eigentlich für die Bombardierung dankbar sein müsste.
Schließlich hat die NATO sie dadurch vom Kommunismus befreit und gibt
ihnen nun die Chance, vom westlichen Großkapital bis auf die Knochen
ausgesaugt zu werden. Frau Albright hat selbst auf die Entwicklung in
Osteuropa seit 1990 hingewiesen. Dort hat eine seit Jahrzehnten nicht
mehr gekannte Armut und Verelendung statt gefunden. Allerdings hat dort
jetzt jeder die Freiheit, zum Shoppen nach London oder New York zu
jetten.
Saarburg den 6. 10. 2000
JOURNAL DE BELGRADE - Samedi 7 octobre, 12 heures
Belgrade Journal – Saturday, October 07, 2000, noon
The 12 months ahead will decide the fate of Yugoslavia
MICHEL COLLON
The big news took place last night. All the international media spoke of
it. Milosevic recognized the victory of Kostunica in the presidential
voting.
Then there is that news they're not reporting but which could turn out
to
be still more important for the eight crucial months ahead. The attempt
of
the opposition to seduce certain Montenegrin parliamentary
representatives
to form a new governing majority failed.
While it still has to be confirmed, the next Yugoslav government should
be
composed of the Milosevic's party, the SPS (Socialist Party of Serbia),
its
traditional ally the YUL (Yugoslav United Left) and the Montenegrin
deputies of the SNP lead by Momir Bulatovic.
Will we be then in a situation of dual power? No, because the legal
powers
of the president are less important than those of the Yugoslav
government,
and still less important than those of the Serb government, which has
responsibility for the largest part of the governmental budget.
Kostunica president and Milosevic prime minister?
Kostunica president and Milosevic prime minister? This surrealist
scenario
that we had envisaged a few days ago, this scenario would be
Washington's
nightmare. And that's why the West is in the process of doing all to
definitively eliminate Milosevic and his party from political life.
Since I've been in Belgrade, I've looked at BBC, CNN and a
German
broadcast. All present a caricatured image of an entire people united
against a dictator. Reality is different. Milosevic retains an important
base of support – the opposition is not contesting the results of the
parliamentary elections – and what exists is a country divided in two
camps, after months of pressures and enormous campaigns from the
outside.
As I wrote earlier, the opposition leaders have looked to create
a
"Bucharest syndrome." Milosevic has done all he could to avoid falling
into
this trap. He waited in a war of attrition, a war of nerves, as he did
during the preceding confrontations unleashed by the opposition in 1991
and
1996-1997, which he was able to survive. "In any case, we didn't want to
send the army and provoke a bloodbath," government officials told me.
Wouldn't he have been better off recognizing immediately
Kostunica's
victory. Many people, even those in his camp, believe this. "The people
believe that he was trying to maneuver and they didn't like that," Ivana
explained to me, though she was someone who voted for Milosevic.
But to the Kostunica camp, we could ask another question: Why
did they
refuse the second round of the elections when it seemed certain they
would
win? We think that Washington and the opposition leaders were trying to
bring about the "Bucharest syndrome" in order to definitively eliminate
Milosevic from the political scene.
But is only Milosevic involved in all this? No. It concerns an entire
current of Yugoslav society, which is resisting the takeover by the
multinational corporations. On November 17, 1998, the official British
news
agency Reuter mentioned a poll of 300 companies that stated that
"privatization raises no enthusiasm in Serbia, the workers fear massive
layoffs. No new companies have been privatized since the new
privatization
law was adopted a month ago.
Besides, the desire to eliminate Milosevic does not involve Yugoslavia
alone. Why is Milosevic Washington's chosen target?
"Because he symbolizes resistance to the New World Order and he could
give
the wrong ideas to other forces in the Balkans," answered Ljliljana, an
official in a ministry. "In Washington's eyes, Milosevic is a dangerous
virus and could contaminate the Balkans."
Clinton and the demonization of the Serbs
At present, Kostunica is faced with two problems. The first one
immediately: The burning of parliament was not understood or approved by
his own supporters. "Even NATO spared this symbol," people said here
angrily. "Hitler had burned the Reichstag as a provocation before the
Second World War. And RTS television had been bombed by NATO, leaving 16
victims. The memories of this are still fresh. It's infuriating."
Second problem: the burdensome congratulations from the United States.
Yesterday, I heard Bill Clinton's speech. Its substance: "This victory
is
ours, it is the outcome of U.S. combat over the last 10 years. We
stopped
Milosevic from continuing the attack on Croatia, Bosnia and other
countries. With the demonstration in Belgrade, we ended for good the
threat
from a person who is responsible for hundreds of thousands of victims."
What? Milosevic killed so many people? Alone? Clinton should be assured
that no Serb thinks about it this way. Practically all continue to
believe
that their country had been attacked by the great powers that supported
extremists like Tudjman [Croatia] and Izetbegovic [Bosnia] and who
showed
themselves unjustly against Serbs. Certain of them – and this includes
those among those who voted for the opposition – even criticize
Milosevic
for not having been firm enough and not having fought to the end.
This discourse by Clinton is a continuation of the policy of demonizing
the
Serbs, who are presented as monsters, because it is evident that if
there
were "hundreds of thousands of victims," a large number of Serbs are
criminals, and the witch-hunt will begin with all the selectivity and
arbitrariness of which Washington is capable.
Besides, Washington has no intention of giving justice to the Serbs. For
example in Kosovo, Bernard Kouchner just announced that he would have to
remain there for a generation and that U.S. troops would stay there
"without doubt for 10 years." (Washington Times, September 30)
Even under Kostunica, the Serbs won't be able to enjoy peace, because
the
U.S. needs a situation where a permanent "low-intensity" conflict
exists.
This situation permits them to maintain tension in a region, and
pressure
against a country. To believe that the USA is in Kosovo to re-establish
peace and help the Albanians, that's like believing that Hitler had
occupied Czechoslovakia because of his love for the Sudeten German
minority. Pretexts, pretexts. … The only thing that matters to the great
powers is to occupy strategic regions.
The 12 months ahead, before the elections in Serbia, will be decisive.
Will
Yugoslavia become a colony of the International Monetary Fund and NATO?
If
they want to JOURNAL DE BELGRADE - Samedi 7 octobre, 12 heures
Belgrade Journal – Saturday, October 07, 2000, noon
The 12 months ahead will decide the fate of Yugoslavia
MICHEL COLLON
The big news took place last night. All the international media spoke of
it. Milosevic recognized the victory of Kostunica in the presidential
voting.
Then there is that news they're not reporting but which could turn out
to
be still more important for the eight crucial months ahead. The attempt
of
the opposition to seduce certain Montenegrin parliamentary
representatives
to form a new governing majority failed.
While it still has to be confirmed, the next Yugoslav government should
be
composed of the Milosevic's party, the SPS (Socialist Party of Serbia),
its
traditional ally the YUL (Yugoslav United Left) and the Montenegrin
deputies of the SNP lead by Momir Bulatovic.
Will we be then in a situation of dual power? No, because the legal
powers
of the president are less important than those of the Yugoslav
government,
and still less important than those of the Serb government, which has
responsibility for the largest part of the governmental budget.
Kostunica president and Milosevic prime minister?
Kostunica president and Milosevic prime minister? This surrealist
scenario
that we had envisaged a few days ago, this scenario would be
Washington's
nightmare. And that's why the West is in the process of doing all to
definitively eliminate Milosevic and his party from political life.
Since I've been in Belgrade, I've looked at BBC, CNN and a
German
broadcast. All present a caricatured image of an entire people united
against a dictator. Reality is different. Milosevic retains an important
base of support – the opposition is not contesting the results of the
parliamentary elections – and what exists is a country divided in two
camps, after months of pressures and enormous campaigns from the
outside.
As I wrote earlier, the opposition leaders have looked to create
a
"Bucharest syndrome." Milosevic has done all he could to avoid falling
into
this trap. He waited in a war of attrition, a war of nerves, as he did
during the preceding confrontations unleashed by the opposition in 1991
and
1996-1997, which he was able to survive. "In any case, we didn't want to
send the army and provoke a bloodbath," government officials told me.
Wouldn't he have been better off recognizing immediately
Kostunica's
victory. Many people, even those in his camp, believe this. "The people
believe that he was trying to maneuver and they didn't like that," Ivana
explained to me, though she was someone who voted for Milosevic.
But to the Kostunica camp, we could ask another question: Why
did they
refuse the second round of the elections when it seemed certain they
would
win? We think that Washington and the opposition leaders were trying to
bring about the "Bucharest syndrome" in order to definitively eliminate
Milosevic from the political scene.
But is only Milosevic involved in all this? No. It concerns an entire
current of Yugoslav society, which is resisting the takeover by the
multinational corporations. On November 17, 1998, the official British
news
agency Reuter mentioned a poll of 300 companies that stated that
"privatization raises no enthusiasm in Serbia, the workers fear massive
layoffs. No new companies have been privatized since the new
privatization
law was adopted a month ago.
Besides, the desire to eliminate Milosevic does not involve Yugoslavia
alone. Why is Milosevic Washington's chosen target?
"Because he symbolizes resistance to the New World Order and he could
give
the wrong ideas to other forces in the Balkans," answered Ljliljana, an
official in a ministry. "In Washington's eyes, Milosevic is a dangerous
virus and could contaminate the Balkans."
Clinton and the demonization of the Serbs
At present, Kostunica is faced with two problems. The first one
immediately: The burning of parliament was not understood or approved by
his own supporters. "Even NATO spared this symbol," people said here
angrily. "Hitler had burned the Reichstag as a provocation before the
Second World War. And RTS television had been bombed by NATO, leaving 16
victims. The memories of this are still fresh. It's infuriating."
Second problem: the burdensome congratulations from the United States.
Yesterday, I heard Bill Clinton's speech. Its substance: "This victory
is
ours, it is the outcome of U.S. combat over the last 10 years. We
stopped
Milosevic from continuing the attack on Croatia, Bosnia and other
countries. With the demonstration in Belgrade, we ended for good the
threat
from a person who is responsible for hundreds of thousands of victims."
What? Milosevic killed so many people? Alone? Clinton should be assured
that no Serb thinks about it this way. Practically all continue to
believe
that their country had been attacked by the great powers that supported
extremists like Tudjman [Croatia] and Izetbegovic [Bosnia] and who
showed
themselves unjustly against Serbs. Certain of them – and this includes
those among those who voted for the opposition – even criticize
Milosevic
for not having been firm enough and not having fought to the end.
This discourse by Clinton is a continuation of the policy of demonizing
the
Serbs, who are presented as monsters, because it is evident that if
there
were "hundreds of thousands of victims," a large number of Serbs are
criminals, and the witch-hunt will begin with all the selectivity and
arbitrariness of which Washington is capable.
Besides, Washington has no intention of giving justice to the Serbs. For
example in Kosovo, Bernard Kouchner just announced that he would have to
remain there for a generation and that U.S. troops would stay there
"without doubt for 10 years." (Washington Times, September 30)
Even under Kostunica, the Serbs won't be able to enjoy peace, because
the
U.S. needs a situation where a permanent "low-intensity" conflict
exists.
This situation permits them to maintain tension in a region, and
pressure
against a country. To believe that the USA is in Kosovo to re-establish
peace and help the Albanians, that's like believing that Hitler had
occupied Czechoslovakia because of his love for the Sudeten German
minority. Pretexts, pretexts. … The only thing that matters to the great
powers is to occupy strategic regions.
The 12 months ahead, before the elections in Serbia, will be decisive.
Will
Yugoslavia become a colony of the International Monetary Fund and NATO?
If
they want to reverse the current electoral tendencies – especially among
the youth – Milosevic and his allies will have to promote a still more
socially conscious policy, an ever firmer struggle against privileges.
And
a strategy of communication more effective toward the youths. But the
progressive forces of the entire world will also have a role to play to
unmask the actions of Washington behind these elections that were not
truly
free.
---
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA
FEDERAL MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS
YUGOSLAV DAILY SURVEY
BELGRADE, 10 October 2000 No. 3214
C O N T E N T S :
FROM THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA
-KOSTUNICA: YUGOSLAV CONSTITUTION PREVENTS KOSOVO'S INDEPENDENCE
-SERBIA TO HOLD PARLIAMENTARY POLLS ON DEC 17
-SERBIAN PARLIAMENT PASSES NEW LAW ON ELECTIONS
-DOS PROPOSES ECONOMIST LABUS FOR NEW YUGOSLAV PRIME MINISTER
-SNP READY TO TALK ABOUT NEW YUGOSLAV GOVERNMENT
-DJUKANOVIC: GOVERNMENT OF EXPERTS IN YUGOSLAVIA WOULD DO LEAST HARM
-YUGOSLAV ARMY PROVED IT IS AN ARMY OF THE PEOPLE
-SERBIAN CHURCH LEADER LEAVES FOR VIENNA
YUGOSLAVIASERBIAMINISTERRESIGNATION
-SERBIAN MINISTER JANJIC RESIGNS
-SERBIAN HEALTH MINISTER RESIGNS
-SERBIAN MINISTER OF TOURISM RESIGNS
YUGOSLAVIAFRANCE
-FRANCE'S VEDRINE ARRIVES IN BELGRADE
-KOSTUNICA CONFERS WITH VEDRINE
-CHIRAC'S PARTY OPPOSES EXTRADITION OF MILOSEVIC TO HAGUE TRIBUNAL
YUGOSLAVIAPOLAND
-YUGOSLAVIA'S KOSTUNICA CONGRATULATES POLAND'S KWASNIEWSKI
YUGOSLAVIA - RUSSIA
-RUSSIA RETAINED POSITIONS IN YUGOSLAVIA STATE DUMA OFFICIAL
YUGOSLAVIA - CZECHOSLOVAKIA
-CZECH HAVEL SAYS SERBIA TAKES DEMOCRATIC ROAD
YUGOSLAVIA - ITALY
-ITALIAN PRIME MINISTER TO VISIT BELGRADE THURSDAY
YUGOSLAVIA - ROMANIA
-ROMANIAN FOREIGN MINISTER ARRIVES IN YUGOSLAVIA
YUGOSLAVIA -NATO
-CHANGES IN YUGOSLAVIA WELLFOUNDED HOPE
-NATO MINISTERS WELCOME DEMOCRATIC CHANGES IN YUGOSLAVIA
YUGOSLAVIASANCTIONSLIFTING
-EU LIFTS ANTIYUGOSLAV SANCTIONS
-EU WELCOMES ELECTION OF VOJISLAV KOSTUNICA AS NEW YUGOSLAV PRESIDENT
-FISCHER: E.U. LIFTS ALL MAIN SANCTIONS AGAINST YUGOSLAVIA
-WASHINGTON LIKELY TO FOLLOW E.U.LEAD, LIFT ANTIYUGOSLAV SANCTIONS
-DINI: SANCTIONS' LIFTING SHOWS SUPPORT FOR BELGRADE
-CROATIA: LIFTING OF ANTIYUGOSLAV SANCTIONS BY E.U. PREMATURE
-PROSPECTS FOR RECOVERY OF YUGOSLAV ECONOMY
YUGOSLAVIADUTCHRELEASE
-FOUR DUTCHMEN RELEASED FROM INVESTIGATIVE PRISON
KOSTUNICA: YUGOSLAV CONSTITUTION PREVENTS
KOSOVO'S INDEPENDENCE
PARIS, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Yugoslav President Vojislav Kostunica
has
told French television that the Yugoslav Constitution does not allow for
the possibility of independence for either Kosovo or Montenegro.
"As for independence for Kosovo and Montenego, which you speak
about, let me put it this way: our Yugoslav Constitution does not allow
for
independence for Kosovo or for independence for Montenegro, because
these
two elements make up the state, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia",
Kostunica told TF1 television.
In the interview quoted also by the Agence France Presse (AFP),
he
told all those "who hope or dream" about independence, such as ethnic
"Albanian separatists", that independence is "impossible because there
is
the U.N. Security Council's Resolution 1244 which guarantees the
territorial integrity and sovereignty of the FRY.
"The question of Kosovo should be settled within the framework
of
this resolution and not according to the demands and wishes of certain
ethnic Albanian leaders, especially those separatistminded".
The implementation of Resolution 1244 on Kosovo "will permit
the
situation in the region to become stabilised, and this stability is
absolutely necessary to us in the current chaotic situation" in that
province, he added.
"The resolution will bring peace and stability to Kosovo from
the
moment it is properly implemented, especially to the Serb refugees", he
stressed.
SERBIA TO HOLD PARLIAMENTARY POLLS ON DEC 17
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Serbia's leading parliamentary
parties
and the Democratic Opposition of Serbia (DOS) agreed on Monday to call
early parliamentary elections for Dec 17, and the formal decision is to
be
taken within days.
The early polls had originally been announced for Dec 19, but
the
date was subsequently moved ahead, so Serbs would not have to vote on a
Tuesday and the feast day of St. Nicholas, celebrated by many as their
patron saint.
SERBIAN PARLIAMENT PASSES NEW LAW ON ELECTIONS
BELGRADE, Oct 9 (Tanjug). The Serbian parliament adopted Monday
a
new law on the election of deputies, proposed by the Serbian Radical
Party
(SRS).
Presenting the proposal, Tomislav Nikolic (SRS) said that
Serbia
should from now on be a single constituency and that a republican
electoral
commission should be created, comprising 16 permanent members to be
appointed by the republican parliament at the proposal of party clubs.
The commission must provide election materials to all within
five
days of the scheduling of elections.
Electoral lists must be endorsed by signatures of support by
the
citizens, which must first be certified in court.
Army troops will no longer vote in their barracks but at the
closest polling stations.
Polling stations will be opened for at least 100 and at most
2,500
voters.
The present regulations that a party needs to win at least 5
percent of the votes in order to enter parliament and that a sum equal
to
one thousand average wages should be earmarked for financing the
participants' campaigns have been retained.
The Serbian parliamentary parties reached agreement Monday with
Serbian President Milan Milutinovic to hold early parliamentary
elections
on December 17.
DOS PROPOSES ECONOMIST LABUS FOR NEW YUGOSLAV PRIME MINISTER
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) The Democratic Opposition of Serbia
(DOS) proposes that the new Yugoslav government be made of experts, also
naming G17 Plus Chief Executive Miroljub Labus as a candidate for the
office of prime minister, a DOS leader and Democratic Party chief Zoran
Djindjic said on Tuesday.
Speaking at a press conference at Belgrade's Media Centre,
Djindjic said that neither Montenegro's Democratic Socialist Party, nor
President of Montenegro Milo Djukanovic have any objections to forming a
government of experts.
Commenting on the probable lineup of the new government,
Djindjic
quoted Djukanovic as saying he would not oppose any government proposed
by
DOS.
Labus said he was in a very delicate situation, as neither the
Serbian nor the Yugoslav governments were currently functioning.
"Through a series of circumstances, I am acting prime minister
with a great responsibility," Labus said, adding that he was willing to
do
this for another week, after which officials of the responsible
institutions should take over.
(...)
SERBIAN MINISTER JANJIC RESIGNS
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Serbia's Minister of High Education
Jevrem Janjic resigned on Tuesday, pleading moral reasons.
The text of the resignation, submitted to the Serbian Assembly
(parliament) president, a copy of which has been forwarded by the
ministry
to TANJUG, says:
"After the Serbian Assembly's refusal to put the law on the
University on the agenda, and in solidarity with the chancellors and
deans
who have resigned and with other colleagues and students, I feel a moral
obligation to resign as minister of high education."
SERBIAN HEALTH MINISTER RESIGNS
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Serbian Minister of Health Milovan
Bojic said late on Monday he had submitted resignations both as minister
of
health and as vicepremier of this Yugoslav republic.
In an unsigned statement faxed to TANJUG on ministry letterhead
paper, Bojic said he had joined the government with "the best of
intentions
and a sincere wish to keep KosovoMetohija and the sovereignty of the
country".
He added he had tried over the past three months as minister of
health to help surmount the severe crisis in the national health care
system.
Bojic gave no reasons for the resignation.
SERBIAN MINISTER OF TOURISM RESIGNS
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Serbia's Minister of Tourism
Slobodan
Cerovic resigned irrevocably on Tuesday.
In his letter of resignation submitted to Premier Mirko
Marjanovic, a copy of which has been forwarded to TANJUG, Cerovic said:
"Please accept my irrevocable resignation to the post of
minister
of tourism in the government of the Republic of Serbia. Thank you for
your
cooperation".
(...)
YUGOSLAVIAFRANCE
FRANCE'S VEDRINE ARRIVES IN BELGRADE
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) French Foreign Minister Hubert
Vedrine,
current chairman of the European Union's Ministerial Council, arrived in
Belgrade on Tuesday, where he is expected to meet with Yugoslav
President
Vojislav Kostunica.
At Belgrade Airport, Vedrine was welcomed by Deputy Foreign
Minister Zoran Novakvoic.
Vedrine is to be brief Kostunica on the E.U. Council's decision
taken in Luxembourg on Monday to lift oil and flight bans against
Yugoslavia and on financial assistance that Europe plans to render
Yugoslavia.
He will also formally invite Kostunica to attend the E.U.
summit
in Biarritz, France, on Oct. 1314.
TANJUG learns from sources close to the president that Vedrine
will be leaving Yugoslavia in the afternoon.
KOSTUNICA CONFERS WITH VEDRINE
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Democratic processes in Serbia and
its
return to Europe have been substantially facilitated by the fact that
France chairs the European Union (E.U.), Yugoslav President Vojislav
Kostunica said after talks with French Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine
in
Belgrade on Tuesday.
"It seems providence itself sent us our old friends the French
to
help us," Kostunica said, adding that yesterday's E.U. decision to lift
the
sanctions against Yugoslavia made room for establishing relations with
international financial institutions and enabled Yugoslavia's
rapprochement
to its political, economic and cultural neighbourhood Europe.
Kostunica told reporters his talks with Vedrine had been open,
constructive and comprehensive, and underscored that they had discussed
many issues such as Kosovo and Metohija, future cooperation and help
from
the international community and E.U. to Yugoslavia.
Speaking about Kosovo and Metohija, Kostunica and Vedrine urged
respect for international laws inherent in U.N. Security Council
Resolution
1244.
Vedrine said yesterday's decision by the E.U. immediately to
lift
sanctions was "Europe's response to the courage of the Serb people" and
that Europe had made an entire list of proposals for possible
cooperation
between Yugoslavia and the E.U. and the world, with the objective to
help
and strengthen democratic changes in Yugoslavia and support its
reconciliation with its neighbours.
Vedrine informed reporters that Kostunica had accepted an
official
invitation by French President Jacques Chirac to take part in the work
of
the E.U. summit in Biarritz on Oct 1314.
(...)
YUGOSLAVIA - ITALY
ITALIAN PRIME MINISTER TO VISIT BELGRADE THURSDAY
ROME, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Italian Prime Minister Giuliano Amato
will
visit on Thursday Belgrade, where he will meet with the new president of
Yugoslavia, Vojislav Kostunica, it was confirmed to Tanjug on Tuesday in
Rome.
The meeting with President Kostunica was announced on Tuesday
personally by Prime Minister Amato in Bern, the Italian news agency Ansa
reported.
Amato said that the objective of his visit was to personally
congratulate the new president of Yugoslavia his electoral success.
Election changes in Yugoslavia are a confirmation, Amato
assessed,
of a new political path that is a precondition for cooperation between
Italy and the European Union with the new Yugoslavia, and that is an
additional reason for the upcoming visit. The Italian prime
minister
said it was necessary to establish a completely new bilateral
cooperation
that would no longer be based on expressions of joy and congratulations,
but should have concrete financial support. Italy will also take part in
those activities, but the international community must take part in
solving
the problem of reconstruction and economicfinancial renewal of
Yugoslavia,
Amato said.
YUGOSLAVIA -NATO
CHANGES IN YUGOSLAVIA WELLFOUNDED HOPE
LONDON, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Democratic changes in Yugoslavia give
rise to a wellfounded hope that the entire region will start stable
reforms, said on Tuesday NATO defense ministers at an informal meeting
in
the English town of Birmingham.
NATO, it was said, lends support to those changes and to new
Yugoslav President Vojislav Kostunica, but it was noted that the
Alliance
did not know him still enough.
NATO Secretary General George Robertson in his introductory
speech
assessed that the events last week in Yugoslavia were truly historical
and
that everyone who wishes well the country must now help for the created
prospects to become reality.
It is still, however, too early, Robertson said, to say what
would
be the consequences of the change in Yugoslavia for the overall security
situation in the Balkans and on the territory of the former SFRY. In
that
light he indicated that for the time being there would be no charges in
NATO's presence in Kosovo and Metohija and in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
NATO ministers, it was announced, assess that the greatest
problem
could be KosovoMetohija where Albanian separatists are alarmed by the
changes in Belgrade.
At the summit in Birmimgham, also discussed are future NATO
contacts with the new Yugoslav government although, it has been learnt,
the
prevailing conviction is that the Alliance should mainly stand aside and
leave those contacts up to the European UNion.
The mood among the Serbs, it is recalled, is not favourable for
NATO because of last year's bombing.
NATO MINISTERS WELCOME DEMOCRATIC CHANGES IN YUGOSLAVIA
BRUSSELS, Oct 10 (Tanjug) NATO defense ministers welcomed the
democratic changes in Yugoslavia at a meeting in Birmingham on Tuesday,
but
NATO SecretaryGeneral George Robertson said it was too soon to precisely
determine how the changes in Yugoslavia would affect the entire region.
NATO does not intend to withdraw troops from the Balkans,
Robertson told the session, underscoring that the election defeat of
former
Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic provided vast possibilities to the
international community.
In his speech, a copy of which was distributed to reporters at
the
NATO Brussels headquarters, Robertson reiterated that the KFOR and SFOR
would remain in Kosovo and Metohija and Bosnia, respectively, as long as
necessary, and that they would continue to present the foundation of
stability in the region.
Robertson said the events of last week could be described as
historic, but that the most important challenge for all those who wish
well
to Yugoslavia at this time was to turn the hope of reforms into reality.
The international community must do everything in its power to
help the Yugoslav people become a true partner of the EuroAtlantic
community, Robertson said, since it considers southeastern Europe and
countries from the territory of the former Yugoslavia of great
importance.
YUGOSLAVIASANCTIONSLIFTING
EU LIFTS ANTIYUGOSLAV SANCTIONS
BRUSSELS, Oct 9 (Tanjug). The European Union lifted Monday the
oil
embargo and the (already suspended) ban on civilian air traffic against
Yugoslavia, paving the way for removing all economic and political
obstacles to Yugoslavia's reintegration in the international community
and
European processes.
The EU foreign ministers decided at their session in Luxemburg
that Yugoslavia should be enabled to use the funds from the program for
Balkan recovery.
The EU ministerial council took this decision two days after
Vojislav Kostunica was sworn in as new Yugoslav president, thus
honouring
the EU commitment to initiate the process of lifting sanctions as soon
as
democratic changes start in Yugoslavia.
This, they said, is the first step towards Yugoslavia's
reintegration in Europe, following changes in the country in line with
the
will of the people.
The ministers lifted all sanctions in force since 1998, except
those concerning former president Slobodan Milosevic and his close
aides.
The removal of financial sanctions will follow shortly, in the
second phase of Yugoslavia's integration in the recovery program.
The ministers also discussed granting of emergency humanitarian
aid to Yugoslavia in order to remove the effects of sanctions introduced
two years ago over the KosovoMetohija crisis.
This should be followed by emergency EU measures for the
reconstruction of economic infrastructure as envisaged by the
Stabilization
Pact for southeastern Europe. In the EU budget for this year, about 240
million euros were earmarked for that purpose, that should be released
following a relevant decision of EU ministers.
EU WELCOMES ELECTION OF VOJISLAV KOSTUNICA AS NEW YUGOSLAV
PRESIDENT
BRUSSELS, Oct 9 (Tanjug). The European Union foreign ministers
adopted Monday in Luxemburg a special declaration on Yugoslavia, hailing
the election of Vojislav Kostunica as Yugoslavia's president,
underlining
that by voting for him, the people of Yugoslavia had chosen democracy
and
Europe.
In line with its commitments made before the Yugoslav
elections,
the EU Council consequently decided to radically change its policy
towards
Yugoslavia.
The Council will address an official invitation to Kostunica to
attend the summit of the European Union and Balkan states scheduled for
November 24 in Zagreb.
The EU also decided to lift all antiYugoslav sanctions in force
since 1998, except those concerning former Yugoslav president Slobodan
Milosevic and his close aides.
The EU Council proposed Monday to Yugoslavia an accord on
stabilization and integration which would give this country a privileged
and preferred treatment in its relations with the EU, French Foreign
Minister Hubert Vedrine said. He was chairing the EU ministerial meeting
which lifted the antiYugoslav sanctions.
That accord paves the way for Yugoslavia's integration in the
EU,
Vedrine said, adding at a press conference that Yugoslavia would have
its
place in the Balkan Stabilization Pact which envisages considerable
financial aid to countries in southeastern Europe.
FISCHER: E.U. LIFTS ALL MAIN SANCTIONS AGAINST YUGOSLAVIA
BRUSSELS, Oct 9 (Tanjug) German Foreign Minister Jozef Fischer
said in Luxembourg on Monday that European Union (E.U.) foreign
ministers
had lifted all the main sanctions against Yugoslavia.
Fischer said after a session of the E.U. Council that only
measures affecting former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic and
individuals who were his closest allies remain in force.
The German Foreign Minister said the Council had reached full
accord on lifting the sanctions. Certain details concerning the concrete
decisions will be further discusssed, Fischer said.
WASHINGTON LIKELY TO FOLLOW E.U.LEAD, LIFT ANTIYUGOSLAV
SANCTIONS
NEW YORK, Oct 10 (Tanjug) The United States will probably
follow
the European Union's lead in lifting antiYugoslav oil and flight bans
over
the coming days, it was confirmed in Washington late on Monday.
National Security Council spokesman Philip Crowley said he
expected the United States to take "comparable steps in the coming days"
to
the European Union.
Washington's statement came after Monday's decision by the
European Union to lift its oil and flight bans against Yugoslavia in the
wake of diplomatic changes in the country.
Crowley said he could not be sure how far Washington's steps
would
coincide with those of the European Union, but added that sanctions
which
could be lifted to improve the life of the people swiftly would be
concentrated on.
DINI: SANCTIONS' LIFTING SHOWS SUPPORT FOR BELGRADE
ROME, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Italian Foreign Minister Lamberto Dini
said
on Tuesday that the European Union's lifting of antiYugoslav sanctions
was
a clear sign of support for the new political course steered by
Belgrade.
Dini warned, however, that the giving of necessary economic aid
to
democratic Serbia must not affect the Union's efforts for the
Mediterranean
countries.
The lifting of the antiYugoslav oil ban is described by the
Italian press as a gift from the European Union to Yugoslavia's new
President Vojislav Kostunica.
CROATIA: LIFTING OF ANTIYUGOSLAV SANCTIONS BY E.U. PREMATURE
ZAGREB, Oct 10 (Tanjug) The European Union (E.U.) decision to
lift the main sanctions against Yugoslavia was so far received less than
enthusiastically only in Croatian political circles and media, who
described the move as expected but premature, and even euphoric.
Commentaries pointed out, and seemingly even expressed the
desire
that the current favour of the international community toward Serbia
would
wan because of its refusal to cooperate with The Hague tribunal.
Certain media expressed deep disappointment at the lifting of
these sanctions and, generally, at the new stand of the international
community toward Serbia. The commentator of the Zagreb daily Jutarnji
list
on Tuesday concluded with obvious disappointment that "it is an unusual
and
idiotic feeling these days to be a Croat" when one sees the world's
favouritism toward Serbia.
PROSPECTS FOR RECOVERY OF YUGOSLAV ECONOMY
LONDON, Oct 10 (Tanjug) The European Union (E.U.) decision to
lift sanctions, including a ban on trade and business with Yugoslav
companies, opens up good prospects for the recovery of that country and
the
entire region, Michael Taylor of London's Economist Intelligence Unit
told
the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) on Tuesday.
Yugoslavia's recovery is very important for the entire region,
primarily because of traffic links. It is the fastest and cheapest route
to
western Europe for Yugoslavia's neighbours, he said.
Yugoslavia will doubtless be a very important partner to the
E.U.
in future. In addition to German and Greek investors, who have already
said
they would continue as quickly as possible where they had left off in
1998,
when the E.U. sanctions were further tightened, British companies have
also
shown interest in entering the Yugoslav market.
Nigel Peters, the director of the British Consulting Bureau
said,
according to the BBC, that business in connection with the renewal of
power
facilities and oil refineries destroyed in the NATO air strikes against
Yugoslavia in the spring of 1999 are currently in the focus of
attention.
This requires government support and that is why talks will be
held at the foreign and trade ministries this week, he said. British
experts should visit Belgrade as soon as possible and see on the spot
what
needs to be done, since it is of key importance for the British industry
to
join in major projects at the very beginning, Peters said.
YUGOSLAVIADUTCHRELEASE
FOUR DUTCHMEN RELEASED FROM INVESTIGATIVE PRISON
BELGRADE, Oct 9 (Tanjug) The investigative judge cancelled
detention for four Dutchmen suspected of preparing the assassination of
former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic and they were released from
investigative prison in Belgrade on Monday around 15.00.
The four Dutchmen Bas van Schaik, Jeroen van Iersel, Sander
Zeitsen and Godfried de Rie were arrested in July this year on the
border
of Serbia with KosovoMetohija.
According to one of their lawyers, Zoran Jovanovic, the
Dutchmen
were released "after the prosecutor concluded there was not enough
evidence
to continue the process."
The four Dutchmen, it was said immediately after their arrest,
had
in their possession maps, knives, cameras and uniforms.
Immediately after the arrest, RadioTelevision Serbia showed
their
taped confessions, but the arrested later denied they intended to
assassinate Milosevic, and said their initial confessions had bee made
under duress.
Belgrade Journal – Saturday, October 07, 2000, noon
The 12 months ahead will decide the fate of Yugoslavia
MICHEL COLLON
The big news took place last night. All the international media spoke of
it. Milosevic recognized the victory of Kostunica in the presidential
voting.
Then there is that news they're not reporting but which could turn out
to
be still more important for the eight crucial months ahead. The attempt
of
the opposition to seduce certain Montenegrin parliamentary
representatives
to form a new governing majority failed.
While it still has to be confirmed, the next Yugoslav government should
be
composed of the Milosevic's party, the SPS (Socialist Party of Serbia),
its
traditional ally the YUL (Yugoslav United Left) and the Montenegrin
deputies of the SNP lead by Momir Bulatovic.
Will we be then in a situation of dual power? No, because the legal
powers
of the president are less important than those of the Yugoslav
government,
and still less important than those of the Serb government, which has
responsibility for the largest part of the governmental budget.
Kostunica president and Milosevic prime minister?
Kostunica president and Milosevic prime minister? This surrealist
scenario
that we had envisaged a few days ago, this scenario would be
Washington's
nightmare. And that's why the West is in the process of doing all to
definitively eliminate Milosevic and his party from political life.
Since I've been in Belgrade, I've looked at BBC, CNN and a
German
broadcast. All present a caricatured image of an entire people united
against a dictator. Reality is different. Milosevic retains an important
base of support – the opposition is not contesting the results of the
parliamentary elections – and what exists is a country divided in two
camps, after months of pressures and enormous campaigns from the
outside.
As I wrote earlier, the opposition leaders have looked to create
a
"Bucharest syndrome." Milosevic has done all he could to avoid falling
into
this trap. He waited in a war of attrition, a war of nerves, as he did
during the preceding confrontations unleashed by the opposition in 1991
and
1996-1997, which he was able to survive. "In any case, we didn't want to
send the army and provoke a bloodbath," government officials told me.
Wouldn't he have been better off recognizing immediately
Kostunica's
victory. Many people, even those in his camp, believe this. "The people
believe that he was trying to maneuver and they didn't like that," Ivana
explained to me, though she was someone who voted for Milosevic.
But to the Kostunica camp, we could ask another question: Why
did they
refuse the second round of the elections when it seemed certain they
would
win? We think that Washington and the opposition leaders were trying to
bring about the "Bucharest syndrome" in order to definitively eliminate
Milosevic from the political scene.
But is only Milosevic involved in all this? No. It concerns an entire
current of Yugoslav society, which is resisting the takeover by the
multinational corporations. On November 17, 1998, the official British
news
agency Reuter mentioned a poll of 300 companies that stated that
"privatization raises no enthusiasm in Serbia, the workers fear massive
layoffs. No new companies have been privatized since the new
privatization
law was adopted a month ago.
Besides, the desire to eliminate Milosevic does not involve Yugoslavia
alone. Why is Milosevic Washington's chosen target?
"Because he symbolizes resistance to the New World Order and he could
give
the wrong ideas to other forces in the Balkans," answered Ljliljana, an
official in a ministry. "In Washington's eyes, Milosevic is a dangerous
virus and could contaminate the Balkans."
Clinton and the demonization of the Serbs
At present, Kostunica is faced with two problems. The first one
immediately: The burning of parliament was not understood or approved by
his own supporters. "Even NATO spared this symbol," people said here
angrily. "Hitler had burned the Reichstag as a provocation before the
Second World War. And RTS television had been bombed by NATO, leaving 16
victims. The memories of this are still fresh. It's infuriating."
Second problem: the burdensome congratulations from the United States.
Yesterday, I heard Bill Clinton's speech. Its substance: "This victory
is
ours, it is the outcome of U.S. combat over the last 10 years. We
stopped
Milosevic from continuing the attack on Croatia, Bosnia and other
countries. With the demonstration in Belgrade, we ended for good the
threat
from a person who is responsible for hundreds of thousands of victims."
What? Milosevic killed so many people? Alone? Clinton should be assured
that no Serb thinks about it this way. Practically all continue to
believe
that their country had been attacked by the great powers that supported
extremists like Tudjman [Croatia] and Izetbegovic [Bosnia] and who
showed
themselves unjustly against Serbs. Certain of them – and this includes
those among those who voted for the opposition – even criticize
Milosevic
for not having been firm enough and not having fought to the end.
This discourse by Clinton is a continuation of the policy of demonizing
the
Serbs, who are presented as monsters, because it is evident that if
there
were "hundreds of thousands of victims," a large number of Serbs are
criminals, and the witch-hunt will begin with all the selectivity and
arbitrariness of which Washington is capable.
Besides, Washington has no intention of giving justice to the Serbs. For
example in Kosovo, Bernard Kouchner just announced that he would have to
remain there for a generation and that U.S. troops would stay there
"without doubt for 10 years." (Washington Times, September 30)
Even under Kostunica, the Serbs won't be able to enjoy peace, because
the
U.S. needs a situation where a permanent "low-intensity" conflict
exists.
This situation permits them to maintain tension in a region, and
pressure
against a country. To believe that the USA is in Kosovo to re-establish
peace and help the Albanians, that's like believing that Hitler had
occupied Czechoslovakia because of his love for the Sudeten German
minority. Pretexts, pretexts. … The only thing that matters to the great
powers is to occupy strategic regions.
The 12 months ahead, before the elections in Serbia, will be decisive.
Will
Yugoslavia become a colony of the International Monetary Fund and NATO?
If
they want to JOURNAL DE BELGRADE - Samedi 7 octobre, 12 heures
Belgrade Journal – Saturday, October 07, 2000, noon
The 12 months ahead will decide the fate of Yugoslavia
MICHEL COLLON
The big news took place last night. All the international media spoke of
it. Milosevic recognized the victory of Kostunica in the presidential
voting.
Then there is that news they're not reporting but which could turn out
to
be still more important for the eight crucial months ahead. The attempt
of
the opposition to seduce certain Montenegrin parliamentary
representatives
to form a new governing majority failed.
While it still has to be confirmed, the next Yugoslav government should
be
composed of the Milosevic's party, the SPS (Socialist Party of Serbia),
its
traditional ally the YUL (Yugoslav United Left) and the Montenegrin
deputies of the SNP lead by Momir Bulatovic.
Will we be then in a situation of dual power? No, because the legal
powers
of the president are less important than those of the Yugoslav
government,
and still less important than those of the Serb government, which has
responsibility for the largest part of the governmental budget.
Kostunica president and Milosevic prime minister?
Kostunica president and Milosevic prime minister? This surrealist
scenario
that we had envisaged a few days ago, this scenario would be
Washington's
nightmare. And that's why the West is in the process of doing all to
definitively eliminate Milosevic and his party from political life.
Since I've been in Belgrade, I've looked at BBC, CNN and a
German
broadcast. All present a caricatured image of an entire people united
against a dictator. Reality is different. Milosevic retains an important
base of support – the opposition is not contesting the results of the
parliamentary elections – and what exists is a country divided in two
camps, after months of pressures and enormous campaigns from the
outside.
As I wrote earlier, the opposition leaders have looked to create
a
"Bucharest syndrome." Milosevic has done all he could to avoid falling
into
this trap. He waited in a war of attrition, a war of nerves, as he did
during the preceding confrontations unleashed by the opposition in 1991
and
1996-1997, which he was able to survive. "In any case, we didn't want to
send the army and provoke a bloodbath," government officials told me.
Wouldn't he have been better off recognizing immediately
Kostunica's
victory. Many people, even those in his camp, believe this. "The people
believe that he was trying to maneuver and they didn't like that," Ivana
explained to me, though she was someone who voted for Milosevic.
But to the Kostunica camp, we could ask another question: Why
did they
refuse the second round of the elections when it seemed certain they
would
win? We think that Washington and the opposition leaders were trying to
bring about the "Bucharest syndrome" in order to definitively eliminate
Milosevic from the political scene.
But is only Milosevic involved in all this? No. It concerns an entire
current of Yugoslav society, which is resisting the takeover by the
multinational corporations. On November 17, 1998, the official British
news
agency Reuter mentioned a poll of 300 companies that stated that
"privatization raises no enthusiasm in Serbia, the workers fear massive
layoffs. No new companies have been privatized since the new
privatization
law was adopted a month ago.
Besides, the desire to eliminate Milosevic does not involve Yugoslavia
alone. Why is Milosevic Washington's chosen target?
"Because he symbolizes resistance to the New World Order and he could
give
the wrong ideas to other forces in the Balkans," answered Ljliljana, an
official in a ministry. "In Washington's eyes, Milosevic is a dangerous
virus and could contaminate the Balkans."
Clinton and the demonization of the Serbs
At present, Kostunica is faced with two problems. The first one
immediately: The burning of parliament was not understood or approved by
his own supporters. "Even NATO spared this symbol," people said here
angrily. "Hitler had burned the Reichstag as a provocation before the
Second World War. And RTS television had been bombed by NATO, leaving 16
victims. The memories of this are still fresh. It's infuriating."
Second problem: the burdensome congratulations from the United States.
Yesterday, I heard Bill Clinton's speech. Its substance: "This victory
is
ours, it is the outcome of U.S. combat over the last 10 years. We
stopped
Milosevic from continuing the attack on Croatia, Bosnia and other
countries. With the demonstration in Belgrade, we ended for good the
threat
from a person who is responsible for hundreds of thousands of victims."
What? Milosevic killed so many people? Alone? Clinton should be assured
that no Serb thinks about it this way. Practically all continue to
believe
that their country had been attacked by the great powers that supported
extremists like Tudjman [Croatia] and Izetbegovic [Bosnia] and who
showed
themselves unjustly against Serbs. Certain of them – and this includes
those among those who voted for the opposition – even criticize
Milosevic
for not having been firm enough and not having fought to the end.
This discourse by Clinton is a continuation of the policy of demonizing
the
Serbs, who are presented as monsters, because it is evident that if
there
were "hundreds of thousands of victims," a large number of Serbs are
criminals, and the witch-hunt will begin with all the selectivity and
arbitrariness of which Washington is capable.
Besides, Washington has no intention of giving justice to the Serbs. For
example in Kosovo, Bernard Kouchner just announced that he would have to
remain there for a generation and that U.S. troops would stay there
"without doubt for 10 years." (Washington Times, September 30)
Even under Kostunica, the Serbs won't be able to enjoy peace, because
the
U.S. needs a situation where a permanent "low-intensity" conflict
exists.
This situation permits them to maintain tension in a region, and
pressure
against a country. To believe that the USA is in Kosovo to re-establish
peace and help the Albanians, that's like believing that Hitler had
occupied Czechoslovakia because of his love for the Sudeten German
minority. Pretexts, pretexts. … The only thing that matters to the great
powers is to occupy strategic regions.
The 12 months ahead, before the elections in Serbia, will be decisive.
Will
Yugoslavia become a colony of the International Monetary Fund and NATO?
If
they want to reverse the current electoral tendencies – especially among
the youth – Milosevic and his allies will have to promote a still more
socially conscious policy, an ever firmer struggle against privileges.
And
a strategy of communication more effective toward the youths. But the
progressive forces of the entire world will also have a role to play to
unmask the actions of Washington behind these elections that were not
truly
free.
---
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA
FEDERAL MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS
YUGOSLAV DAILY SURVEY
BELGRADE, 10 October 2000 No. 3214
C O N T E N T S :
FROM THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA
-KOSTUNICA: YUGOSLAV CONSTITUTION PREVENTS KOSOVO'S INDEPENDENCE
-SERBIA TO HOLD PARLIAMENTARY POLLS ON DEC 17
-SERBIAN PARLIAMENT PASSES NEW LAW ON ELECTIONS
-DOS PROPOSES ECONOMIST LABUS FOR NEW YUGOSLAV PRIME MINISTER
-SNP READY TO TALK ABOUT NEW YUGOSLAV GOVERNMENT
-DJUKANOVIC: GOVERNMENT OF EXPERTS IN YUGOSLAVIA WOULD DO LEAST HARM
-YUGOSLAV ARMY PROVED IT IS AN ARMY OF THE PEOPLE
-SERBIAN CHURCH LEADER LEAVES FOR VIENNA
YUGOSLAVIASERBIAMINISTERRESIGNATION
-SERBIAN MINISTER JANJIC RESIGNS
-SERBIAN HEALTH MINISTER RESIGNS
-SERBIAN MINISTER OF TOURISM RESIGNS
YUGOSLAVIAFRANCE
-FRANCE'S VEDRINE ARRIVES IN BELGRADE
-KOSTUNICA CONFERS WITH VEDRINE
-CHIRAC'S PARTY OPPOSES EXTRADITION OF MILOSEVIC TO HAGUE TRIBUNAL
YUGOSLAVIAPOLAND
-YUGOSLAVIA'S KOSTUNICA CONGRATULATES POLAND'S KWASNIEWSKI
YUGOSLAVIA - RUSSIA
-RUSSIA RETAINED POSITIONS IN YUGOSLAVIA STATE DUMA OFFICIAL
YUGOSLAVIA - CZECHOSLOVAKIA
-CZECH HAVEL SAYS SERBIA TAKES DEMOCRATIC ROAD
YUGOSLAVIA - ITALY
-ITALIAN PRIME MINISTER TO VISIT BELGRADE THURSDAY
YUGOSLAVIA - ROMANIA
-ROMANIAN FOREIGN MINISTER ARRIVES IN YUGOSLAVIA
YUGOSLAVIA -NATO
-CHANGES IN YUGOSLAVIA WELLFOUNDED HOPE
-NATO MINISTERS WELCOME DEMOCRATIC CHANGES IN YUGOSLAVIA
YUGOSLAVIASANCTIONSLIFTING
-EU LIFTS ANTIYUGOSLAV SANCTIONS
-EU WELCOMES ELECTION OF VOJISLAV KOSTUNICA AS NEW YUGOSLAV PRESIDENT
-FISCHER: E.U. LIFTS ALL MAIN SANCTIONS AGAINST YUGOSLAVIA
-WASHINGTON LIKELY TO FOLLOW E.U.LEAD, LIFT ANTIYUGOSLAV SANCTIONS
-DINI: SANCTIONS' LIFTING SHOWS SUPPORT FOR BELGRADE
-CROATIA: LIFTING OF ANTIYUGOSLAV SANCTIONS BY E.U. PREMATURE
-PROSPECTS FOR RECOVERY OF YUGOSLAV ECONOMY
YUGOSLAVIADUTCHRELEASE
-FOUR DUTCHMEN RELEASED FROM INVESTIGATIVE PRISON
KOSTUNICA: YUGOSLAV CONSTITUTION PREVENTS
KOSOVO'S INDEPENDENCE
PARIS, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Yugoslav President Vojislav Kostunica
has
told French television that the Yugoslav Constitution does not allow for
the possibility of independence for either Kosovo or Montenegro.
"As for independence for Kosovo and Montenego, which you speak
about, let me put it this way: our Yugoslav Constitution does not allow
for
independence for Kosovo or for independence for Montenegro, because
these
two elements make up the state, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia",
Kostunica told TF1 television.
In the interview quoted also by the Agence France Presse (AFP),
he
told all those "who hope or dream" about independence, such as ethnic
"Albanian separatists", that independence is "impossible because there
is
the U.N. Security Council's Resolution 1244 which guarantees the
territorial integrity and sovereignty of the FRY.
"The question of Kosovo should be settled within the framework
of
this resolution and not according to the demands and wishes of certain
ethnic Albanian leaders, especially those separatistminded".
The implementation of Resolution 1244 on Kosovo "will permit
the
situation in the region to become stabilised, and this stability is
absolutely necessary to us in the current chaotic situation" in that
province, he added.
"The resolution will bring peace and stability to Kosovo from
the
moment it is properly implemented, especially to the Serb refugees", he
stressed.
SERBIA TO HOLD PARLIAMENTARY POLLS ON DEC 17
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Serbia's leading parliamentary
parties
and the Democratic Opposition of Serbia (DOS) agreed on Monday to call
early parliamentary elections for Dec 17, and the formal decision is to
be
taken within days.
The early polls had originally been announced for Dec 19, but
the
date was subsequently moved ahead, so Serbs would not have to vote on a
Tuesday and the feast day of St. Nicholas, celebrated by many as their
patron saint.
SERBIAN PARLIAMENT PASSES NEW LAW ON ELECTIONS
BELGRADE, Oct 9 (Tanjug). The Serbian parliament adopted Monday
a
new law on the election of deputies, proposed by the Serbian Radical
Party
(SRS).
Presenting the proposal, Tomislav Nikolic (SRS) said that
Serbia
should from now on be a single constituency and that a republican
electoral
commission should be created, comprising 16 permanent members to be
appointed by the republican parliament at the proposal of party clubs.
The commission must provide election materials to all within
five
days of the scheduling of elections.
Electoral lists must be endorsed by signatures of support by
the
citizens, which must first be certified in court.
Army troops will no longer vote in their barracks but at the
closest polling stations.
Polling stations will be opened for at least 100 and at most
2,500
voters.
The present regulations that a party needs to win at least 5
percent of the votes in order to enter parliament and that a sum equal
to
one thousand average wages should be earmarked for financing the
participants' campaigns have been retained.
The Serbian parliamentary parties reached agreement Monday with
Serbian President Milan Milutinovic to hold early parliamentary
elections
on December 17.
DOS PROPOSES ECONOMIST LABUS FOR NEW YUGOSLAV PRIME MINISTER
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) The Democratic Opposition of Serbia
(DOS) proposes that the new Yugoslav government be made of experts, also
naming G17 Plus Chief Executive Miroljub Labus as a candidate for the
office of prime minister, a DOS leader and Democratic Party chief Zoran
Djindjic said on Tuesday.
Speaking at a press conference at Belgrade's Media Centre,
Djindjic said that neither Montenegro's Democratic Socialist Party, nor
President of Montenegro Milo Djukanovic have any objections to forming a
government of experts.
Commenting on the probable lineup of the new government,
Djindjic
quoted Djukanovic as saying he would not oppose any government proposed
by
DOS.
Labus said he was in a very delicate situation, as neither the
Serbian nor the Yugoslav governments were currently functioning.
"Through a series of circumstances, I am acting prime minister
with a great responsibility," Labus said, adding that he was willing to
do
this for another week, after which officials of the responsible
institutions should take over.
(...)
SERBIAN MINISTER JANJIC RESIGNS
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Serbia's Minister of High Education
Jevrem Janjic resigned on Tuesday, pleading moral reasons.
The text of the resignation, submitted to the Serbian Assembly
(parliament) president, a copy of which has been forwarded by the
ministry
to TANJUG, says:
"After the Serbian Assembly's refusal to put the law on the
University on the agenda, and in solidarity with the chancellors and
deans
who have resigned and with other colleagues and students, I feel a moral
obligation to resign as minister of high education."
SERBIAN HEALTH MINISTER RESIGNS
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Serbian Minister of Health Milovan
Bojic said late on Monday he had submitted resignations both as minister
of
health and as vicepremier of this Yugoslav republic.
In an unsigned statement faxed to TANJUG on ministry letterhead
paper, Bojic said he had joined the government with "the best of
intentions
and a sincere wish to keep KosovoMetohija and the sovereignty of the
country".
He added he had tried over the past three months as minister of
health to help surmount the severe crisis in the national health care
system.
Bojic gave no reasons for the resignation.
SERBIAN MINISTER OF TOURISM RESIGNS
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Serbia's Minister of Tourism
Slobodan
Cerovic resigned irrevocably on Tuesday.
In his letter of resignation submitted to Premier Mirko
Marjanovic, a copy of which has been forwarded to TANJUG, Cerovic said:
"Please accept my irrevocable resignation to the post of
minister
of tourism in the government of the Republic of Serbia. Thank you for
your
cooperation".
(...)
YUGOSLAVIAFRANCE
FRANCE'S VEDRINE ARRIVES IN BELGRADE
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) French Foreign Minister Hubert
Vedrine,
current chairman of the European Union's Ministerial Council, arrived in
Belgrade on Tuesday, where he is expected to meet with Yugoslav
President
Vojislav Kostunica.
At Belgrade Airport, Vedrine was welcomed by Deputy Foreign
Minister Zoran Novakvoic.
Vedrine is to be brief Kostunica on the E.U. Council's decision
taken in Luxembourg on Monday to lift oil and flight bans against
Yugoslavia and on financial assistance that Europe plans to render
Yugoslavia.
He will also formally invite Kostunica to attend the E.U.
summit
in Biarritz, France, on Oct. 1314.
TANJUG learns from sources close to the president that Vedrine
will be leaving Yugoslavia in the afternoon.
KOSTUNICA CONFERS WITH VEDRINE
BELGRADE, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Democratic processes in Serbia and
its
return to Europe have been substantially facilitated by the fact that
France chairs the European Union (E.U.), Yugoslav President Vojislav
Kostunica said after talks with French Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine
in
Belgrade on Tuesday.
"It seems providence itself sent us our old friends the French
to
help us," Kostunica said, adding that yesterday's E.U. decision to lift
the
sanctions against Yugoslavia made room for establishing relations with
international financial institutions and enabled Yugoslavia's
rapprochement
to its political, economic and cultural neighbourhood Europe.
Kostunica told reporters his talks with Vedrine had been open,
constructive and comprehensive, and underscored that they had discussed
many issues such as Kosovo and Metohija, future cooperation and help
from
the international community and E.U. to Yugoslavia.
Speaking about Kosovo and Metohija, Kostunica and Vedrine urged
respect for international laws inherent in U.N. Security Council
Resolution
1244.
Vedrine said yesterday's decision by the E.U. immediately to
lift
sanctions was "Europe's response to the courage of the Serb people" and
that Europe had made an entire list of proposals for possible
cooperation
between Yugoslavia and the E.U. and the world, with the objective to
help
and strengthen democratic changes in Yugoslavia and support its
reconciliation with its neighbours.
Vedrine informed reporters that Kostunica had accepted an
official
invitation by French President Jacques Chirac to take part in the work
of
the E.U. summit in Biarritz on Oct 1314.
(...)
YUGOSLAVIA - ITALY
ITALIAN PRIME MINISTER TO VISIT BELGRADE THURSDAY
ROME, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Italian Prime Minister Giuliano Amato
will
visit on Thursday Belgrade, where he will meet with the new president of
Yugoslavia, Vojislav Kostunica, it was confirmed to Tanjug on Tuesday in
Rome.
The meeting with President Kostunica was announced on Tuesday
personally by Prime Minister Amato in Bern, the Italian news agency Ansa
reported.
Amato said that the objective of his visit was to personally
congratulate the new president of Yugoslavia his electoral success.
Election changes in Yugoslavia are a confirmation, Amato
assessed,
of a new political path that is a precondition for cooperation between
Italy and the European Union with the new Yugoslavia, and that is an
additional reason for the upcoming visit. The Italian prime
minister
said it was necessary to establish a completely new bilateral
cooperation
that would no longer be based on expressions of joy and congratulations,
but should have concrete financial support. Italy will also take part in
those activities, but the international community must take part in
solving
the problem of reconstruction and economicfinancial renewal of
Yugoslavia,
Amato said.
YUGOSLAVIA -NATO
CHANGES IN YUGOSLAVIA WELLFOUNDED HOPE
LONDON, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Democratic changes in Yugoslavia give
rise to a wellfounded hope that the entire region will start stable
reforms, said on Tuesday NATO defense ministers at an informal meeting
in
the English town of Birmingham.
NATO, it was said, lends support to those changes and to new
Yugoslav President Vojislav Kostunica, but it was noted that the
Alliance
did not know him still enough.
NATO Secretary General George Robertson in his introductory
speech
assessed that the events last week in Yugoslavia were truly historical
and
that everyone who wishes well the country must now help for the created
prospects to become reality.
It is still, however, too early, Robertson said, to say what
would
be the consequences of the change in Yugoslavia for the overall security
situation in the Balkans and on the territory of the former SFRY. In
that
light he indicated that for the time being there would be no charges in
NATO's presence in Kosovo and Metohija and in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
NATO ministers, it was announced, assess that the greatest
problem
could be KosovoMetohija where Albanian separatists are alarmed by the
changes in Belgrade.
At the summit in Birmimgham, also discussed are future NATO
contacts with the new Yugoslav government although, it has been learnt,
the
prevailing conviction is that the Alliance should mainly stand aside and
leave those contacts up to the European UNion.
The mood among the Serbs, it is recalled, is not favourable for
NATO because of last year's bombing.
NATO MINISTERS WELCOME DEMOCRATIC CHANGES IN YUGOSLAVIA
BRUSSELS, Oct 10 (Tanjug) NATO defense ministers welcomed the
democratic changes in Yugoslavia at a meeting in Birmingham on Tuesday,
but
NATO SecretaryGeneral George Robertson said it was too soon to precisely
determine how the changes in Yugoslavia would affect the entire region.
NATO does not intend to withdraw troops from the Balkans,
Robertson told the session, underscoring that the election defeat of
former
Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic provided vast possibilities to the
international community.
In his speech, a copy of which was distributed to reporters at
the
NATO Brussels headquarters, Robertson reiterated that the KFOR and SFOR
would remain in Kosovo and Metohija and Bosnia, respectively, as long as
necessary, and that they would continue to present the foundation of
stability in the region.
Robertson said the events of last week could be described as
historic, but that the most important challenge for all those who wish
well
to Yugoslavia at this time was to turn the hope of reforms into reality.
The international community must do everything in its power to
help the Yugoslav people become a true partner of the EuroAtlantic
community, Robertson said, since it considers southeastern Europe and
countries from the territory of the former Yugoslavia of great
importance.
YUGOSLAVIASANCTIONSLIFTING
EU LIFTS ANTIYUGOSLAV SANCTIONS
BRUSSELS, Oct 9 (Tanjug). The European Union lifted Monday the
oil
embargo and the (already suspended) ban on civilian air traffic against
Yugoslavia, paving the way for removing all economic and political
obstacles to Yugoslavia's reintegration in the international community
and
European processes.
The EU foreign ministers decided at their session in Luxemburg
that Yugoslavia should be enabled to use the funds from the program for
Balkan recovery.
The EU ministerial council took this decision two days after
Vojislav Kostunica was sworn in as new Yugoslav president, thus
honouring
the EU commitment to initiate the process of lifting sanctions as soon
as
democratic changes start in Yugoslavia.
This, they said, is the first step towards Yugoslavia's
reintegration in Europe, following changes in the country in line with
the
will of the people.
The ministers lifted all sanctions in force since 1998, except
those concerning former president Slobodan Milosevic and his close
aides.
The removal of financial sanctions will follow shortly, in the
second phase of Yugoslavia's integration in the recovery program.
The ministers also discussed granting of emergency humanitarian
aid to Yugoslavia in order to remove the effects of sanctions introduced
two years ago over the KosovoMetohija crisis.
This should be followed by emergency EU measures for the
reconstruction of economic infrastructure as envisaged by the
Stabilization
Pact for southeastern Europe. In the EU budget for this year, about 240
million euros were earmarked for that purpose, that should be released
following a relevant decision of EU ministers.
EU WELCOMES ELECTION OF VOJISLAV KOSTUNICA AS NEW YUGOSLAV
PRESIDENT
BRUSSELS, Oct 9 (Tanjug). The European Union foreign ministers
adopted Monday in Luxemburg a special declaration on Yugoslavia, hailing
the election of Vojislav Kostunica as Yugoslavia's president,
underlining
that by voting for him, the people of Yugoslavia had chosen democracy
and
Europe.
In line with its commitments made before the Yugoslav
elections,
the EU Council consequently decided to radically change its policy
towards
Yugoslavia.
The Council will address an official invitation to Kostunica to
attend the summit of the European Union and Balkan states scheduled for
November 24 in Zagreb.
The EU also decided to lift all antiYugoslav sanctions in force
since 1998, except those concerning former Yugoslav president Slobodan
Milosevic and his close aides.
The EU Council proposed Monday to Yugoslavia an accord on
stabilization and integration which would give this country a privileged
and preferred treatment in its relations with the EU, French Foreign
Minister Hubert Vedrine said. He was chairing the EU ministerial meeting
which lifted the antiYugoslav sanctions.
That accord paves the way for Yugoslavia's integration in the
EU,
Vedrine said, adding at a press conference that Yugoslavia would have
its
place in the Balkan Stabilization Pact which envisages considerable
financial aid to countries in southeastern Europe.
FISCHER: E.U. LIFTS ALL MAIN SANCTIONS AGAINST YUGOSLAVIA
BRUSSELS, Oct 9 (Tanjug) German Foreign Minister Jozef Fischer
said in Luxembourg on Monday that European Union (E.U.) foreign
ministers
had lifted all the main sanctions against Yugoslavia.
Fischer said after a session of the E.U. Council that only
measures affecting former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic and
individuals who were his closest allies remain in force.
The German Foreign Minister said the Council had reached full
accord on lifting the sanctions. Certain details concerning the concrete
decisions will be further discusssed, Fischer said.
WASHINGTON LIKELY TO FOLLOW E.U.LEAD, LIFT ANTIYUGOSLAV
SANCTIONS
NEW YORK, Oct 10 (Tanjug) The United States will probably
follow
the European Union's lead in lifting antiYugoslav oil and flight bans
over
the coming days, it was confirmed in Washington late on Monday.
National Security Council spokesman Philip Crowley said he
expected the United States to take "comparable steps in the coming days"
to
the European Union.
Washington's statement came after Monday's decision by the
European Union to lift its oil and flight bans against Yugoslavia in the
wake of diplomatic changes in the country.
Crowley said he could not be sure how far Washington's steps
would
coincide with those of the European Union, but added that sanctions
which
could be lifted to improve the life of the people swiftly would be
concentrated on.
DINI: SANCTIONS' LIFTING SHOWS SUPPORT FOR BELGRADE
ROME, Oct 10 (Tanjug) Italian Foreign Minister Lamberto Dini
said
on Tuesday that the European Union's lifting of antiYugoslav sanctions
was
a clear sign of support for the new political course steered by
Belgrade.
Dini warned, however, that the giving of necessary economic aid
to
democratic Serbia must not affect the Union's efforts for the
Mediterranean
countries.
The lifting of the antiYugoslav oil ban is described by the
Italian press as a gift from the European Union to Yugoslavia's new
President Vojislav Kostunica.
CROATIA: LIFTING OF ANTIYUGOSLAV SANCTIONS BY E.U. PREMATURE
ZAGREB, Oct 10 (Tanjug) The European Union (E.U.) decision to
lift the main sanctions against Yugoslavia was so far received less than
enthusiastically only in Croatian political circles and media, who
described the move as expected but premature, and even euphoric.
Commentaries pointed out, and seemingly even expressed the
desire
that the current favour of the international community toward Serbia
would
wan because of its refusal to cooperate with The Hague tribunal.
Certain media expressed deep disappointment at the lifting of
these sanctions and, generally, at the new stand of the international
community toward Serbia. The commentator of the Zagreb daily Jutarnji
list
on Tuesday concluded with obvious disappointment that "it is an unusual
and
idiotic feeling these days to be a Croat" when one sees the world's
favouritism toward Serbia.
PROSPECTS FOR RECOVERY OF YUGOSLAV ECONOMY
LONDON, Oct 10 (Tanjug) The European Union (E.U.) decision to
lift sanctions, including a ban on trade and business with Yugoslav
companies, opens up good prospects for the recovery of that country and
the
entire region, Michael Taylor of London's Economist Intelligence Unit
told
the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) on Tuesday.
Yugoslavia's recovery is very important for the entire region,
primarily because of traffic links. It is the fastest and cheapest route
to
western Europe for Yugoslavia's neighbours, he said.
Yugoslavia will doubtless be a very important partner to the
E.U.
in future. In addition to German and Greek investors, who have already
said
they would continue as quickly as possible where they had left off in
1998,
when the E.U. sanctions were further tightened, British companies have
also
shown interest in entering the Yugoslav market.
Nigel Peters, the director of the British Consulting Bureau
said,
according to the BBC, that business in connection with the renewal of
power
facilities and oil refineries destroyed in the NATO air strikes against
Yugoslavia in the spring of 1999 are currently in the focus of
attention.
This requires government support and that is why talks will be
held at the foreign and trade ministries this week, he said. British
experts should visit Belgrade as soon as possible and see on the spot
what
needs to be done, since it is of key importance for the British industry
to
join in major projects at the very beginning, Peters said.
YUGOSLAVIADUTCHRELEASE
FOUR DUTCHMEN RELEASED FROM INVESTIGATIVE PRISON
BELGRADE, Oct 9 (Tanjug) The investigative judge cancelled
detention for four Dutchmen suspected of preparing the assassination of
former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic and they were released from
investigative prison in Belgrade on Monday around 15.00.
The four Dutchmen Bas van Schaik, Jeroen van Iersel, Sander
Zeitsen and Godfried de Rie were arrested in July this year on the
border
of Serbia with KosovoMetohija.
According to one of their lawyers, Zoran Jovanovic, the
Dutchmen
were released "after the prosecutor concluded there was not enough
evidence
to continue the process."
The four Dutchmen, it was said immediately after their arrest,
had
in their possession maps, knives, cameras and uniforms.
Immediately after the arrest, RadioTelevision Serbia showed
their
taped confessions, but the arrested later denied they intended to
assassinate Milosevic, and said their initial confessions had bee made
under duress.
IL DOSSIER JUGOSLAVIA SUL SITO DELL'I.A.C.
> http://www.iacenter.org/yugo_crisis.htm
IN ENGLISH:
*** Yugoslavia in Crisis--reports and analyses
DOSSIER JUGOSLAVIA SUL SITO DEL P.L.B.
> http://www.ptb.be/solidaire/article.phtml?lang=1&obid=2972
EN FRANCAIS:
* Qui d�tient le pouvoir � Belgrade?
* Le programme des �conomistes du G17
* �Etre contr�l� par la CIA? No problem...�
* Combien de temps durera la f�te?
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/510
EN FRANCAIS:
* Michel Collon, JOURNAL DE BELGRADE 6-7/10/2000
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/506
AUF DEUTSCH: ueber die Lage in Jugoslawien
* Meinungen von verschiedenen Authoren ueber die Lage
* Folgende Texte werden in den Anlagen dokumentiert:
- MIT WEICHEM GELD UND HARTEN DROHUNGEN: JUGOSLAWISCHE WAHLEN VON USA
UND NATO GESTOHLEN. Von Sara Flounders (Aus: "Workers World newspaper"
v. 5.10.2000)
- DEN VON KOSTUNICA UND DEM WESTEN ANGEZETTELTEN B�RGERKRIEG VERHINDERN.
Erkl�rung des Exekutivkomitees der Internationalen Leninistischen
Str�mung; Wien, 27. September 2000 - AUSVERKAUF VERHANDELT. BELGRADER
OPPOSITIONSF�HRER TRAFEN SICH MIT IWF-VERTRETERN IN BULGARIEN Von Michel
Chossudovsky und Jared Israel (Aus: junge Welt v. 04.10.2000; Quelle des
Originalartikels: http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/11.htm )
- DEMOKRATISCHE UND FAIRE BEDINGUNGEN IM LAND SELBST, MASSIVE
MANIPULATIONS- UND ERPRESSUNGSVERSUCHE VON AUSSEN - Fazit der deutschen
Beobachter der Wahlen am 24. September 2000 in Jugoslawien
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/511
AUF DEUTSCH: Weiteres ueber Kosovo, NATO, Wahlen
* Malte Olschewski stellt sein neues Buch vor: "Von den Karawanken bis
zum Kosovo. Die geheime Geschichte der Kriege in Jugoslawien"
NEUES TERMIN IN WIEN !!!
* Deutscher General entlarvt Nato-Propaganda als L�ge (JOESB)
* Dann wird der �rger anfangen (von Rainer Rupp)
* Bei Kostuniva bei�t Frau Albright auf Eisen.
Ein Spaltpilz f�r die transatlantischen Beziehungen. (von Rainer Rupp)
* "Er tritt ab, sie treten an, die USA treten nicht in Erscheinung und
schicken Russland vor."
(Von Rainer Rupp)
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/508
IN ENGLISH: about the situation in Yugoslavia
* Yugoslavia in Crisis section of http://www.iacenter.org
* Michel Collon, BELGRADE JOURNAL 6/10/2000
* What is Albright Really Promising for the
'New' Yugoslavia? By Jared Israel (10-8-2000, also:
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/medical.htm )
* Did any major power NOT fund the Kostunica campaign?
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/everybody's.htm
* More comments by J. Israel, STRATFOR
* DJINDJIC: FUTURE STATE WILL BE UNION OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO; ZAGREB,
October 7 (Tanjug)
* GERMANY DISBURSES A MILLION EUROS FOR CLEARING DANUBE IN YUGOSLAVIA;
BERLIN, October 8 (Tanjug)
* Albright Says Priority Is to Help Kostunica; WASHINGTON (Reuters)
* DINKIC: RATE OF EXCHANGE HALVED FOR D-MARK; BELGRADE, October 8
(Tanjug)
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/509
IN ENGLISH: about the situation in Yugoslavia (2)
* Opposition Leader Djindjic Calls for Complete Yugoslav Submission to
U.S., Comments by Jared Israel (10-09-2000; also:
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/submit2.htm )
* Yugoslav PM and Police Chief Resign, By DUSAN STOJANOVIC .c The
Associated Press
* DOS leader Djindjic: Yugoslavia is to be no more. Text of statement
from Montenegrin Website of the Soros "Open Society" type.
Comments by Jared Israel, Emperor's Clothes
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/dos2.htm
* NATO is getting ready to pick up the harvest, By Tanja Djurovic; Junge
Welt, Monday, 9.10.2000
http://www.iacenter.org/nato_harvest.htm
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/512
IN ENGLISH: about the situation in Yugoslavia (3)
* MICHEL COLLON: JOURNAL DE BELGRADE 7/10/2000
* TANJUG'S YUGOSLAV DAILY SURVEY
HEADLINES AND NEWS SELECTION 10 October 2000
> http://www.iacenter.org/yugo_crisis.htm
Yugoslavia in Crisis--reports and
analyses
In light of the grave events in Belgrade Oct. 5, 2000
and the threat of a complete U.S.-NATO takeover
of Yugoslavia, the International Action Center has
decided to set up this new section of its web site.
Here we will reproduce some of the reports and
analyses from sources independent of the corporate
media, both organizationally and ideologically.
Where possible this will include reports from
Yugoslavia written by honest journalists who have
proven themselves opposed to the NATO bombing
campaign and war of 1999. articles in French
articles in German
The violence that no one speaks
about MICHEL COLLON Oct. 9, 2000
After 10 years, the Opposition
achieved its aim. There is a divided
mood in the capital. Tanja Duorovic Oct.
9, 2000
NATO is getting ready to pick up
the harvest Tanja Djurovic Oct. 9, 2000
The 12 months ahead will decide
the fate of Yugoslavia MICHEL COLLON
Oct. 7, 2000
Crisis in Yugoslavia: Interview with
Ramsey Clark Oct. 6, 2000
BELGRADE JOURNAL � The 8
questions of the day Michel Collon 6
October 2000
Belfast conditions in the Sava-City/
Parliament occupied. Jugoslavia
opposition calls for storming
Belgrade. By Ruediger Goebel Oct. 5, 2000
FACING THREATS AND
BRIBES: WILL YUGOSLAVIA
RESIST U.S.-BACKED
COUNTER-REVOLUTION? Sara
Flounders Oct. 4, 2000
Impass in Yugoslavia/ Is the U.S.
ready to lift the embargo? MICHEL
COLLON Sept. 28, 2000
Toward a second round in the
presidential / Analysis of the
vote-What will happen? Michel Collon
Sept. 27. 2000
U.S./NATO STEAL YUGOSLAV
ELECTIONS-- Soft Money and
Hard Threats Sara Flounders September 27,
2000
MORE
Articles in French
Articles in German
===
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Da oggi su eCircle - Filesharing.
Puoi disporre in ogni gruppo di 20 MB
per documenti, file musicali, films e foto.
Condividili con i soci della tua communit�!
http://www.ecircle.de/ad169846/www.ecircle.it
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eCircle ti offre una nuova opportunit�:
Il tuo sondaggio sul web sugli argomenti che preferisci
Facile da gestire e con rappresentazioni grafiche dei risultati.
E' facile, veloce e gratuito!
Da oggi su
http://www.ecircle.de/ad169844/www.ecircle.it
> http://www.iacenter.org/yugo_crisis.htm
IN ENGLISH:
*** Yugoslavia in Crisis--reports and analyses
DOSSIER JUGOSLAVIA SUL SITO DEL P.L.B.
> http://www.ptb.be/solidaire/article.phtml?lang=1&obid=2972
EN FRANCAIS:
* Qui d�tient le pouvoir � Belgrade?
* Le programme des �conomistes du G17
* �Etre contr�l� par la CIA? No problem...�
* Combien de temps durera la f�te?
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/510
EN FRANCAIS:
* Michel Collon, JOURNAL DE BELGRADE 6-7/10/2000
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/506
AUF DEUTSCH: ueber die Lage in Jugoslawien
* Meinungen von verschiedenen Authoren ueber die Lage
* Folgende Texte werden in den Anlagen dokumentiert:
- MIT WEICHEM GELD UND HARTEN DROHUNGEN: JUGOSLAWISCHE WAHLEN VON USA
UND NATO GESTOHLEN. Von Sara Flounders (Aus: "Workers World newspaper"
v. 5.10.2000)
- DEN VON KOSTUNICA UND DEM WESTEN ANGEZETTELTEN B�RGERKRIEG VERHINDERN.
Erkl�rung des Exekutivkomitees der Internationalen Leninistischen
Str�mung; Wien, 27. September 2000 - AUSVERKAUF VERHANDELT. BELGRADER
OPPOSITIONSF�HRER TRAFEN SICH MIT IWF-VERTRETERN IN BULGARIEN Von Michel
Chossudovsky und Jared Israel (Aus: junge Welt v. 04.10.2000; Quelle des
Originalartikels: http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/11.htm )
- DEMOKRATISCHE UND FAIRE BEDINGUNGEN IM LAND SELBST, MASSIVE
MANIPULATIONS- UND ERPRESSUNGSVERSUCHE VON AUSSEN - Fazit der deutschen
Beobachter der Wahlen am 24. September 2000 in Jugoslawien
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/511
AUF DEUTSCH: Weiteres ueber Kosovo, NATO, Wahlen
* Malte Olschewski stellt sein neues Buch vor: "Von den Karawanken bis
zum Kosovo. Die geheime Geschichte der Kriege in Jugoslawien"
NEUES TERMIN IN WIEN !!!
* Deutscher General entlarvt Nato-Propaganda als L�ge (JOESB)
* Dann wird der �rger anfangen (von Rainer Rupp)
* Bei Kostuniva bei�t Frau Albright auf Eisen.
Ein Spaltpilz f�r die transatlantischen Beziehungen. (von Rainer Rupp)
* "Er tritt ab, sie treten an, die USA treten nicht in Erscheinung und
schicken Russland vor."
(Von Rainer Rupp)
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/508
IN ENGLISH: about the situation in Yugoslavia
* Yugoslavia in Crisis section of http://www.iacenter.org
* Michel Collon, BELGRADE JOURNAL 6/10/2000
* What is Albright Really Promising for the
'New' Yugoslavia? By Jared Israel (10-8-2000, also:
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/medical.htm )
* Did any major power NOT fund the Kostunica campaign?
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/everybody's.htm
* More comments by J. Israel, STRATFOR
* DJINDJIC: FUTURE STATE WILL BE UNION OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO; ZAGREB,
October 7 (Tanjug)
* GERMANY DISBURSES A MILLION EUROS FOR CLEARING DANUBE IN YUGOSLAVIA;
BERLIN, October 8 (Tanjug)
* Albright Says Priority Is to Help Kostunica; WASHINGTON (Reuters)
* DINKIC: RATE OF EXCHANGE HALVED FOR D-MARK; BELGRADE, October 8
(Tanjug)
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/509
IN ENGLISH: about the situation in Yugoslavia (2)
* Opposition Leader Djindjic Calls for Complete Yugoslav Submission to
U.S., Comments by Jared Israel (10-09-2000; also:
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/submit2.htm )
* Yugoslav PM and Police Chief Resign, By DUSAN STOJANOVIC .c The
Associated Press
* DOS leader Djindjic: Yugoslavia is to be no more. Text of statement
from Montenegrin Website of the Soros "Open Society" type.
Comments by Jared Israel, Emperor's Clothes
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/dos2.htm
* NATO is getting ready to pick up the harvest, By Tanja Djurovic; Junge
Welt, Monday, 9.10.2000
http://www.iacenter.org/nato_harvest.htm
> http://www.egroups.com/message/crj-mailinglist/512
IN ENGLISH: about the situation in Yugoslavia (3)
* MICHEL COLLON: JOURNAL DE BELGRADE 7/10/2000
* TANJUG'S YUGOSLAV DAILY SURVEY
HEADLINES AND NEWS SELECTION 10 October 2000
> http://www.iacenter.org/yugo_crisis.htm
Yugoslavia in Crisis--reports and
analyses
In light of the grave events in Belgrade Oct. 5, 2000
and the threat of a complete U.S.-NATO takeover
of Yugoslavia, the International Action Center has
decided to set up this new section of its web site.
Here we will reproduce some of the reports and
analyses from sources independent of the corporate
media, both organizationally and ideologically.
Where possible this will include reports from
Yugoslavia written by honest journalists who have
proven themselves opposed to the NATO bombing
campaign and war of 1999. articles in French
articles in German
The violence that no one speaks
about MICHEL COLLON Oct. 9, 2000
After 10 years, the Opposition
achieved its aim. There is a divided
mood in the capital. Tanja Duorovic Oct.
9, 2000
NATO is getting ready to pick up
the harvest Tanja Djurovic Oct. 9, 2000
The 12 months ahead will decide
the fate of Yugoslavia MICHEL COLLON
Oct. 7, 2000
Crisis in Yugoslavia: Interview with
Ramsey Clark Oct. 6, 2000
BELGRADE JOURNAL � The 8
questions of the day Michel Collon 6
October 2000
Belfast conditions in the Sava-City/
Parliament occupied. Jugoslavia
opposition calls for storming
Belgrade. By Ruediger Goebel Oct. 5, 2000
FACING THREATS AND
BRIBES: WILL YUGOSLAVIA
RESIST U.S.-BACKED
COUNTER-REVOLUTION? Sara
Flounders Oct. 4, 2000
Impass in Yugoslavia/ Is the U.S.
ready to lift the embargo? MICHEL
COLLON Sept. 28, 2000
Toward a second round in the
presidential / Analysis of the
vote-What will happen? Michel Collon
Sept. 27. 2000
U.S./NATO STEAL YUGOSLAV
ELECTIONS-- Soft Money and
Hard Threats Sara Flounders September 27,
2000
MORE
Articles in French
Articles in German
===
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Da oggi su eCircle - Filesharing.
Puoi disporre in ogni gruppo di 20 MB
per documenti, file musicali, films e foto.
Condividili con i soci della tua communit�!
http://www.ecircle.de/ad169846/www.ecircle.it
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eCircle ti offre una nuova opportunit�:
Il tuo sondaggio sul web sugli argomenti che preferisci
Facile da gestire e con rappresentazioni grafiche dei risultati.
E' facile, veloce e gratuito!
Da oggi su
http://www.ecircle.de/ad169844/www.ecircle.it
* VIOLENZE SISTEMATICHE CONTRO LA SINISTRA JUGOSLAVA E I RAPPRESENTANTI
SINDACALI DELLA ZASTAVA
* "COSI' HO CACCIATO SLOBO": RETROSCENA DELLA PSEUDO-RIVOLUZIONE
JUGOSLAVA, DAI FINTI POLIZIOTTI AL VERO PESTAGGIO DEI
GIORNALISTI
ATTENZIONE: diversamente dalle segnalazioni pervenuteci, i siti internet
dei partiti della sinistra parlamentare jugoslava
> http://www.sps.org.yu/
> http://www.jul.org.yu/
risultano ancora on-line, benche' non piu' aggiornati da circa due
settimane.
---
Most za Beograd- Un ponte per Belgrado in terra di Bari
Associazione culturale di solidariet� con la popolazione jugoslava
c/o Rdb via M. Cristina di Savoia 40, 70126 BARI
tel/fax 0805562663 e-mail: ponte@... sito Web: www.isf.it/ponte
Quale "democrazia" in Jugoslavia?
APPELLO PER LA CESSAZIONE IMMEDIATA DELLE VIOLENZE NEI CONFRONTI DEI
COMPAGNI DEL SINDACATO E DELLA SINISTRA JUGOSLAVA
La situazione in Jugoslavia � gravissima e peggiora di ora in ora.
Il saccheggio del palazzo del Parlamento il 5 ottobre, la distruzione della
sede della TV di Stato, l'attacco alla sede del partito socialista serbo a
Belgrado non sono stati episodi isolati, legati alla manifestazione di
piazza.
Le aggressioni di tipo squadristico nei confronti dei militanti e delle
sedi dei partiti di sinistra e del sindacato Samostalni in tutta la
Jugoslavia si susseguono di ora in ora con crescente intensit�. Si tratta
in tutta evidenza di un piano sistematico, volto a distruggere tutte le
organizzazioni politiche e sindacali che rifiutano le politiche
neoliberiste e anticomuniste del programma della "Opposizione democratica
serba" di Kostunica.
Denunciamo in particolare, sulla base di testimonianze dirette, le minacce,
le intimidazioni, le aggressioni compiute a Kragujevac nei confronti dei
rappresentanti del sindacato Samostalni della Zastava, che conosciamo bene
per la loro integrit� e coerenza morale e politica e con i quali avevamo
avviato diverse iniziative di solidariet�.
Luned� 10 ottobre sono stati devastati gli uffici dei rappresentanti
sindacali della Zastava IVECO, della Zastava-automobili. Gli squadristi
hanno imposto le dimissioni, tra gli altri, dei compagni Milan Doncic e
Sreten Milicevic, segretario del sindacato Samostalni della Zastava,che il
mondo dell'associazionismo e del sindacalismo conosce bene, per i loro
interventi in Italia.
Pesantissime intimidazioni e minacce sono state rivolte nei confronti del
presidente del sindacato Samostalni, la compagna Ruzica, cui � stato
intimato di abbandonare la presidenza del sindacato. Con la violenza e col
terrore i nuovi "democratici" si stanno impadronendo delle sedi e delle
strutture del sindacato.
La compagna Rajka Veljovic e tutto il gruppo impegnato nell'organizzazione
delle "adozioni a distanza" insieme con associazioni italiane e con la
CGIL-Lombardia, corrono seri pericoli per la propria incolumit� fisica.
Tutte le emittenti radio-televisive, i giornali sono controllate dai
"democratici", i rappresentanti dei partiti di sinistra (che pure hanno
ottenuto oltre il 35% di consensi elettorali) non hanno nessun accesso
all'informazione.
Nelle fabbriche, negli uffici pubblici, in tutte le strutture dell'apparato
statale si stanno imponendo, a colpi di spranghe e a fucilate, i nuovi
dirigenti "democratici".
Il parlamento serbo � stato costretto con la forza a sciogliersi.
E' questa la nuova "democrazia" jugoslava?
Facciamo appello alle associazioni di solidariet�, ai sindacati, a tutti i
sinceri democratici a mobilitarsi perch� cessi la campagna sistematica di
violenze e intimidazioni contro chi si oppone alle politiche neoliberiste
in Jugoslavia.
---
JOURNAL DE BELGRADE - Lundi 9 octobre, 13 heures
Les violences dont on ne parle pas
Vers une nouvelle �preuve de force?
MICHEL COLLON
On va sans doute vers une nouvelle manifestation de rue, sans doute plus
limit�e. Le
parlement de Serbie se r�unit aujourd'hui et l'opposition DOS a lanc� un
ultimatum: si
la loi sur les universit�s n'est pas abolie (une loi qui visait �
emp�cher l'organisation
des activit�s d'opposition en utilisant l'universit�), alors il y aura
manifestation et le
parlement pourrait �tre sinon envahi, en tout cas encercl� et bloqu�.
Mais le v�ritable enjeu est ailleurs. DOS a obtenu le pr�sident, mais
aucun
gouvernement. Ni celui de Yougoslavie o� on s'attend � un gouvernement
des
socialistes serbes (Milosevic) et mont�n�grins (Bulatovic), ni celui de
Serbie qui est en
place depuis plusieurs ann�es et pour encore un an en principe, et qui
refl�te les anciens
rapports de force �lectoraux.
Quelle majorit� au parlement serbe? L'imbroglio total.
Au parlement serbe, le parti le plus puissant (83 si�ges sur 255), ce
sont les radicaux
(droite nationaliste) de Seselj alli�s � Milosevic. Mais ce parti a �t�
lamin� aux
derni�res �lections, il est menac� de disparition et ses dirigeants
cherchent
d�sesp�r�ment comment le sauver. Pour maintenir l'alliance actuelle, ils
viennent de
formuler une s�rie d'exigences jug�es irr�alistes par un dirigeant du
SPS que j'ai
rencontr�. Par exemple, la loi �lectorale serait r�vis�e pour faire du
pays une seule
grande circonscription, ce qui assurerait aux radicaux de plus grandes
chances d'obtenir
encore des �lus. De ce gouvernement le SPO de Draskovic - lui aussi en
voie de
disparition) s'est retir� et il ne veut pas qu'il subsiste. En r�alit�,
ces deux partis sont
coinc�s: comme DOS les a �vinc�s dans l'�lectorat, ils seraient liquid�s
en cas
d'�lections. Alors, SPO et radicaux sont tent�s de former ensemble un
gouvernement
serbe - sans nouvelles �lections, et sans les socialistes - qui pourrait
durer un an.
Mais d'autre part, ces deux partis avancent surtout leurs exigences pour
faire monter
les ench�res dans des n�gociations avec DOS et avec le SPS. Sans aucun
principe, ils
essaient seulement d'obtenir le peuple, d'un c�t� ou de l'autre.
Les grandes manoeuvres politiciennes battent leur plein �galement autour
de la
constitution du nouveau gouvernement f�d�ral. Le partenaire
indispensable et
fortement courtis�, c'est le parti socialiste mont�n�grin. DOS lui a
imm�diatement fait
des avances. Seulement, dans un an, auront lieu les �lections de la
r�publique du
Mont�n�gro, et dans ce pays, les �lections des r�publiques sont plus
importantes encore
en termes de comp�tences et de budgets. Les socialistes mont�n�grins ont
le vent en
poupe et pourraient l'emporter face � la droite pro-am�ricaine de
Djukanovic. Mais
s'ils s'alliaient avec la droite serbe de DOS qui a exactement le m�me
programme style
FMI que Djukanovic, leur image de marque serait d�t�rior�e. Voil�
pourquoi ils ont
plutot choisi le SPS de Milosevic comme partenaire. Tout a �t� n�goci�.
Il ne reste
qu'un obstacle.
Evinc�, DOS a commenc� � contester le mandat de 18 d�put�s socialistes.
En avancant
l'argument que la Cour Constitutionnelle n'a pas accept� les r�sultats
de ces
circonscriptions mais... pour l'election pr�sidentielle! Par contre, aux
parlementaires,
les repr�sentants de DOS avaient sign� tous les proc�s-verbaux de
r�sultats et il n'y a
pas eu de plainte devant la Commission de contr�le. Pour le Kosovo,
l'argument est que
les bureaux de vote ont �t� ferm�s � 16 heures, au lieu de 20 heures, vu
les conditions
d'ins�curit� y r�gnant. Tout cela parait tir� par les cheveux et
poursuivre un autre but.
Une commission du parlement devrait bientot v�rifier la validit� de ces
18 mandats.
SPS et SNP y sont en majorit� et le r�sultat semble acquis.
Loin des cam�ras, les violences de Djindjic
C'est peut-etre justement pour ca que DOS maintient la pression. Quelle
sont les
m�thodes employ�es? Menaces de manifestations et de blocages des
institutions
l�gales, violences physiques et menaces contre les membres du parti
socialiste et
diverses institutions d'Etat, prises de contr�le par la force de
certaines entreprises.
Derri�re la figure symbolique de Kostunica qui occupe le devant de la
sc�ne, c'est
Zoran Djindjic qui organise tout cela. Vendu depuis longtemps aux
int�rets allemands,
puis am�ricains, comme chacun le sait ici, Djindjic, largement m�pris�,
s'est servi de
Kostunica pour vaincre Milosevic, et � pr�sent, il se rue vers le
pouvoir r�el. Par la
violence.
Le si�ge belgradois du parti socialiste a �t� compl�tement d�truit.
Kostunica a envoy�
un photographe sur place, qui s'est montr� indign�. Des maisons de
membres du SPS
ont �t� incendi�es. De nombreuses entreprises - par l'exemple l'usine de
tabac Din -
ont �t� plac�es de force entre les mains de gens de Djindjic. Ainsi que
de nombreuses
soci�t�s de joint-ventures (collaborant avec des compagnies etrang�res).
Mais des institutions officielles sont elles aussi carr�ment
confisqu�es. La banque des
paiements, celle par laquelle passent tous les transferts financiers, a
�t� mise sous
contr�le de Djindjic. En ce moment, DOS expulse de force le directeur de
l'hopital des
enfants, Monsieur Scepanovic, tr�s comp�tent, mais coupable d'etre
membre du parti
socialiste. D'autres �v�nements de ce genre ne peuvent encore �tres
racont�s car les
victimes ont trop peur. Mais les faits ont ete consign�s et s'il
arrivait quelque chose, ils
seraient diffus�s. Et en province, les actes de terreur sont encore bien
plus importants
qu'� Belgrade o� il faut pr�server une image pr�sentable.
Ce n'est �videmment pas pour ca que le peuple a vot�. Il a vot� pour
vivre mieux, et
parce que la majorit� avait perdu confiance en Milosevic. C'est donc
aussi pour
empecher que ces faits soient connnus de l'opinion que tous les m�dias
ont �t� plac�s
d�s le d�but sous le controle de DOS, plus pr�cis�ment de Djindjic.
C'est DOS et l'Ouest qui ont instaur� le monopole des m�dias!
C'est Djindjic, pas Kostunica, qui a organis�, tr�s efficacement,
l'occupation des m�dias
publics: RTS, l'agence de presse Tanjug, le quotidien Politika. Avec la
complicit� de
certains responsables de ces m�dias, et en �cartant de force les autres
journalistes ou en
les soumettant � de tr�s fortes pressions.
R�sultat: quand vous ouvrez aujourd'hui la t�l�, vous voyez la meme
chose partout:
Kostunica et DOS, ou bien DOS et Kostunica. Rien d'autre. Jamais un
point de vue de
l'autre camp. Ce reproche �tait formul� auparavant contre Milosevic.
Mais, sous
Milosevic, meme s'il y eu des suspensions � certaines p�riodes,
l'opposition avait trois
fois plus de m�dias que le pouvoir et cinq fois plus que le pouvoir au
niveau des m�dias
�lectroniques. Et aussi ses TV. La population recevait constamment ces
opinions-l�,
qui l'ont d'ailleurs grandement influenc�e A pr�sent, toute l'info est
control�e par un
seul parti, et on appelle ca la "d�mocratie".
Avec d'ailleurs, des m�thodes psychologico-m�diatiques tr�s modernes
dont on voit
qu'elles ont �t� pr�par�es depuis longtemps. Les dollars de Washington
(voir nos
pr�c�dents articles) ont �t� investis pour pr�parer ces m�dias modernes.
Que va-t-il se passer? DOS va essayer de maintenir la pression pour
empecher le
fonctionnement des gouvernements qu'il ne controlerait pas. Soit par des
manifestations et des affrontements, mais la plupart des gens ici
souhaitent la fin des
violences et le retour au calme. Soit par des obstructions
institutionnelles comme celles
d�crites plus haut. Plus le temps passe, moins ils pourront utiliser la
force. C'est du
moins ce que beaucoup esp�rent.
---
-----Original Message-----
From: Ranko Bojanic <bojanic@...-state.edu>
Date: Monday, October 09, 2000 8:41 PM
Subject: SN607:Obavestenje za javnost SPS
>
>
>
>Na mom kompjuteru donji clanak je bio vrlo necitak zbog
>upotrebe "high ASCII" slova za nasa slova c', c^, s^,
>z^ i dj. Nadam se da ce ova v erzija biti mnogo citkija
>Ranko
>
>
>
>OBAVESTENJE ZA JAVNOST
>
>U Beogradu i sirom Srbije nasilje i napadi nad clanovima i
>imovinom Socijalisticke partije Srbije ne prestaju. Po metodu
>organizovanja i nacinu izvrsenja u potpunosti podsecaju na
>akcije jurisnika nacista koje su ovi preduzimali protiv
>levicara u zoru nastajanja nemackog fasizma. Pripadnici DOS-a
>fizicki napadaju clanove rukovodstva SPS-a, zastrasuju
>clanove i pristalice SPS-a fizickim pretnjama, a preko telefona
>anonimno prete zenama i deci socijalista.
>
>Vesto koristeci socijalno nezadovoljstvo radnika, DOS
>organizuje i preduzima nasilnicke protivzakonite akcije
>smenjivanja i proganjanja direktora koji su clanovi SPS-a, ali
>samo u uglednim, poslovno uspesnim i perspektivnim preduzecima.
>
>U Kragujevcu, jurisnici DOS-a su napali, vezali i deset casova
>maltretirali clana IO GO SPS Slavicu Djukic-Dejanovic. Deset
>casova neprekidno su je maltretirali ne bi li je naterali da na
>TV Kragujevac da izjavu kako se odrice svog clanstva u SPS-u.
>Posto nije popustila pred pretnjama, oslobodili su je i
>izrucili pijanoj razularenoj masi. Desetine huligana su je
>samarali, sutirali, pljuvali i psovali.
>
>U Nisu je tesko pretucen radnik Elektrodistribucije Dragisa
>Vucic, novi odbornik SPS u SO Nisa. On je zavrsio u bolnici
>posto su ga na njegovom radnom mestu, u krugu
>Elektrodistribucije, njegove kolege - njih stotinak - bukvalno
>lincovali.
>
>Nocas je u Beogradu ponovo napadnuto sediste Gradske
>organizacije SPS-a. Ovog puta, posto nije bilo vise niceg da
>se opljacka, prostorije su zapalili kako bi bile u potpunosti
>neupotrebljive. U opstinskim odborima Palilule, Vracara, Starog
>Grada i Zvezdare prostorije su totalno unistene i sve vrednosti
>- namestaj i kompjuterska oprema opljackani.
>
>U Boru su demolirane prostorije Opstinskog i Okruznog odbora
>SPS.
>
>U Arilju kamenovali su zgradu OO SPS i sekirama razvalili vrata.
>
>Po povratku iz svog rusilackog pohoda na Beograd, u Kikindi su
>pristalice DOS-a napali Klub Mladih socijalista. Porazbijali su
>prozore i vrata, ali ih je prisustvo clanova SPS u zgradi
>sprecilo da iznesu vrednu opremu Internet kluba Mladih
>socijalista, koja je najverovatnije bila pravi razlog napada.
>
>U Kovacici su pristalice DOS-a skinuli zastave sa zgrade
>Opstinskog odbora SPS a onda ih zapalili na Trgu u centru grada.
>
>Sediste OO SPS u Sremskoj Mitrovici je i druge noci pretrpelo
>vandalizam, kada su ponovo demolirani prozori i vrata zgrade
>SPS-a. U toku jucerasnjeg dana, u Pecincima pripadnici DOS-a
>su upali u prostorije OO SPS i Opstine i promenili brave na
>ulaznim vratima.
>
>06. oktobar 2000 15,00 SAOPSTENJE Iako je Vojislav Kostunica u
>vise navrata u svojim obracanjima javnosti naglasavao da nece
>biti revansizma prema clanovima i simpatizerima levice i da
>pristalice DOS-a postuju i tolerisu drugacija misljenja od
>njihovog (sto je jedna od osnovnih odrednica demokratije), na
>Socijalisticku partiju Srbije u poslednja tri dana srucio se
>rusilacki bezumni talas nasilja kojeg je organizovala
>demokratska opozicija.
>
>Prema prvim informacijama, napadnuta su, a negde porazbijana i
>opljackana sedista Socijalisticke partije Srbije i ugrozeni
>zivoti clanova rukovodstva SPS u Beogradu, Lajkovcu, Leskovcu,
>Prokuplju, Vlasotincu, Uzicu, Aleksincu, Pirotu, Smederevu,
>Raskoj, Kragujevcu, Pancevu, Novom Sadu, Temerinu, Adi,
>Kanjizi, Senti, Sremskoj Mitrovici, Zrenjaninu...
>
>U Beogradu unisteno je i opljackano sediste Gradskog odbora
>SPS Beograda (POGLEDAJTE FOTO ALBUM) i prostorije opstinskih
>odbora SPS u vise beogradskih centralnih opstina.
>
>U toku noci izmedju 5. i 6-og oktobra demonstranti DOS-a nasilno
>su upali u zgradu Privredne komore u Leskovcu. Polupali su sve
>prozore zgrade, pokrali kompjutersku i drugu imovinu, a ono sto
>nisu mogli da ponesu sa sobom unistili; Nasilno su upali u
>prostorije Okruznog odbora SPS Jablanickog okruga, demolirali
>kancelarije i pokrali opremu, polupali prozore i ostetili zgradu
>Skupstine opstine. Prvo su opljackali i odneli sve sto su
>mogli a zatim zapalili kucu, garazu i kola nacelnika
>Jablanickog okruga Zivojina Stefanovica.
>
>Nocas su demolirane prostorije Okruznog odbora SPS i
>Opstinskog odbora SPS Prokuplje.
>
>U Vlasotincu demonstranti su polupali prostorije OO SPS i
>zapalili prostorije JUL-a.
>
>Demonstranti su provalili u Opstinski odbor SPS u Smederevu,
>pokrali sve sto je bilo u prostorijama i opustosili opremu
>Radija "S".
>
>U napadu na sediste SPS-a u Uzicu porazbijana su stakla zgrade.
>
>U Lajkovacu demonstranti su demolirali Zadruznu stedionicu i
>zadruzni kafic. Usli su u prostorije lokalnog radija, razbili
>ulazna vrata i pokrali deo opreme.
>
>Demonstranti su provalili u Opstinski odbor SPS, i pokusali da
>razbijaju i pljackaju ali nisu uspeli da izbace clanove SPS iz
>njihovih prostorija. Slicno su pokusali i sa televizijom SPS-a.
>
>U Kragujevcu demonstranti su usli u zgradu Doma samoupravljaca
>gde je smesten Okruzni odbor SPS, Gradski odbor SPS i TV
>"Globus", medjutim, policija je sprecila vece nasilje.
>
>U Sremskoj Mitrovici razbijena su vrata i prozori na Opstinskom
>odboru SPS.
>
>U Pancevu je skinuta tabla i polupani prozori sedista
>Opstinskog odbora SPS.
>
>Demostranti su razbili ulazna vrata na zgradi Gradskog odbora SPS
>u Novom Sadu, i pokusali su da demoliraju zgradu Pokrajinskog
>odbora SPS Vojvodine.
>
>U Temerinu upali su u prostorije Radio Temerina i nasilno
>preuzeli ovu radio stanicu.
>
>U Adi demonstranti, predvodjeni predstavnicima Saveza
>vojvodjanskih Madjara, napali su kucu predsednika Opstinskog
>odbora SPS Tomic Ognjana, uglednog prosvetnog radnika. Policija
>je kasno intervenisala tako da je kuci naneta velika materijalna
>steta.
>
>Grupa huligana pokusala je da provali u prostorije Opstinskog
>odbora SPS u Zrenjaninu. Razbijena su ulazna vrata i nekoliko
>prozora zgrade.
>
>Napadnuta je kuca nacelnika Srednjebanatskog okruga Ljube
>Slijepcevica. Razbijeni su prozori i srusena ograda. Njihovo
>divljanje sprecila je policija.
>
>I pored uveravanja prvaka Saveza vojvodjanskih Ma��ara da nece
>biti rusilackih napada i uznemiravanja gradjana koji drugacije
>misle, u Kanjizi su napadnute prostorije OO SPS. Ne prestaje se
>sa telefonskim pretnjama gradjanima koji su za mir i toleranciju,
>a posebno Madjarima koji su clanovi ili simpatizeri SPS.
>
>Ovakve vrste uznemiravanja, verbalnih napada i pretnji primenom
>fizicke sile nad gradjanima prisutno je ne samo u gradovima
>Vojvodine, vec i u svim drugim gradovima sirom Srbije gde su
>pristalice DOS-a odrzale svoju Vartolomejsku noc.
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
109 TELEVIDEO Lu 09 Ott 00:48:01
COSI' HO CACCIATO SLOBO
lla testa di un commando di duemila
u mi i, il sindaco di Cacak sostiene di
aver avuto un ruolo decisivo nel crollo
del regime di Milosevic.
Velimir Ilic, incontrando oggi i gior-
nalisti, afferma di aver preparato gli
assalti al Parlamento e alla se e$della
tv federale con contatti segreti avuti
con esponenti delle Forze armate e del-
l Polizia durante i momenti ruciali.
La rivo ta avrebbe quindi avuto una
guida precisa. "I primi poliziotti che
solidarizzavano con i manifestanti era-
no miei uomini travestiti", svela.
Ultim'ora 101 Prima Pag 10
8 octobre 2000
Source: AFP
Le maire de Cacak, Velimir Ilic,vient de reconna�tre avoir �t�, avec un
"commando" de plus de 2.000 hommes, � l'origine de l'assaut jeudi du
parlement et de la t�l�vision � Belgrade, une action pr�m�dit�e visant
�
provoquer la chute de Slobodan Milosevic.
"Notre action avait �t� pr�par�e d'avance. Parmi mes hommes il y avait
des
ex-parachutistes, des anciens officiers de l'arm�e et de la police ainsi
que des gens ayant combattu au sein des forces sp�ciales", a racont�
d'une
voix pos�e � quelques journalistes le maire de Cacak.
"Nombre d'entre nous avions des gilets pare-balles et des armes",
dit-il.
"Notre but �tait tr�s clair, prendre le contr�le des institutions cl�s
du
r�gime, dont le parlement et la t�l�vision. [..] J'ai �t� constamment au
t�l�phone avec un g�n�ral de l'arm�e ainsi qu'avec une partie de la
hi�rarchie du minist�re de l'Int�rieur. Pour l'instant, je pr�f�re ne
pas
divulguer leurs noms".
Enfin, Mr Ilic d�voile que les sc�nes de "fraternisation" entre des
manifestants et des policiers �taient une mise en sc�ne : "C'�taient nos
hommes v�tus d'uniformes de la police.". Bien �tudi�: comme le souligne
la
d�p�che de l'AFP qui rapporte l'interview, ces sc�nes "ont donn�
courage
aux protestataires" [pour ne pas dire:"ont d�courag� les partisans de
Milosevic"], et "ont d�stabilis� les forces encore fid�les �
Milosevic".
La v�rit� sort donc petit � petit sur la soi-disant insurrection
populaire.
Il est certain qu'on en apprendra d'avantage � l'avenir - notamment sur
les
'conseils' qui ont � coup s�r �t� prodigu�s aux Ilic et autres
'd�mocrates'.
Collabo de p�re en fils?
Velimir Ilic tient � souligner le pass� anti-communiste de sa famille :
"Mon p�re a �t� pendu par les �rouges� en 1943". C'est une remarquable
r�f�rence...Il ne pr�cise pas ce qui a justifi� la pendaison par les
partisans de Mr Ilic p�re pendant l'occupation nazie.
Dans le m�me esprit, V. Ilic se vante d'avoir d�sert� pendant la guerre
d'agression de l'OTAN contre la Yougoslavie au printemps 99, et de
s'�tre
plut�t cach� pendant 40 jours dans la for�t. Voil�, comme dirait M.
Clinton, "le peuple [..] qui a repris en main son pays arm� seulement
de
son courage, de ses principes et de son patriotisme".
---
COME VLADAN DUGONJIC HA DISARMATO SPOMENKA JOVIC
"Ho atteso per 10 anni. Avevamo provato a fare lo stesso gia' il 9 marzo
1991"
(sintesi di un articolo uscito sul giornale GLAS, vicino alla coalizione
liberal-nazionalista DOS, il giorno 7/10/2000)
"Con questo aggeggio ogni sera attorno alle 19:30 lei turbava la mia
anima": lo dice mostrando il microfono, il suo "trofeo", Vladan Dugonjic,
un ingegnere 40enne della cittadina di Lipolist presso Sabac. "Questo l'ho
tolto io personalmente a Spomenka Jovic. Mentre ancora bruciava il
Parlamento, loro a sole poche centinaia di metri di distanza stavano
montando i pezzi per il secondo telegiornale. Sono volato attraverso il
piano terra in fiamme, sono arrivato non so su che piano e li ho trovati
proprio sul luogo del delitto. Non credeva a quello che le stava
succedendo: le ho strappato il microfono dalla mano, le ho mollato uno
schiaffone - e quasta e' la prima volta in vita mia che alzo le mani su
di una dama [sic]... La potevo anche ammazzare ma sono riuscito a
contenere la mia rabbia, le ho sputato dopo averle dato lo schiaffo e le
ho detto: "Che Iddio d'ora in poi ti giudichi, io il mio l'ho fatto".
In quel momento ho visto che trascinavano fuori Komrakov, per
"accarezzarlo"... Ho visto Milanovic, si e' raggomitolato come un
poveraccio. Erano cosi' miseri che per un momento mi hanno fatto ribrezzo
Erano cosi' piccoli che era di troppo persino colpirli"...
Dugonjic continua descrivendo euforicamente il pestaggio di alcuni
giornalisti da parte di un gruppo giunto dalla cittadina di Cacak.
"Nella mia mente c'era solo un pensiero: non dovevo rientrare a mani vuote
nella mia cittadina", percio' si e' portato via il microfono. Per nove
anni "mi sono rammaricato di non averlo fatto prima, allora non c'eravamo
riusciti e solamente adesso la vita e' ritornata in me".
Quattro giorni sulle barricate presso Sabac, quattro notti a protestare in
piazza, ma ha capito che questo non era sufficiente e che doveva recarsi
nella capitale. E cosi' fu.
===
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eCircle ti offre una nuova opportunita:
Il tuo sondaggio sul web sugli argomenti che preferisci
Facile da gestire e con rappresentazioni grafiche dei risultati.
E' facile, veloce e gratuito!
Da oggi su
http://www.ecircle.de/ad157031/www.ecircle.it
SINDACALI DELLA ZASTAVA
* "COSI' HO CACCIATO SLOBO": RETROSCENA DELLA PSEUDO-RIVOLUZIONE
JUGOSLAVA, DAI FINTI POLIZIOTTI AL VERO PESTAGGIO DEI
GIORNALISTI
ATTENZIONE: diversamente dalle segnalazioni pervenuteci, i siti internet
dei partiti della sinistra parlamentare jugoslava
> http://www.sps.org.yu/
> http://www.jul.org.yu/
risultano ancora on-line, benche' non piu' aggiornati da circa due
settimane.
---
Most za Beograd- Un ponte per Belgrado in terra di Bari
Associazione culturale di solidariet� con la popolazione jugoslava
c/o Rdb via M. Cristina di Savoia 40, 70126 BARI
tel/fax 0805562663 e-mail: ponte@... sito Web: www.isf.it/ponte
Quale "democrazia" in Jugoslavia?
APPELLO PER LA CESSAZIONE IMMEDIATA DELLE VIOLENZE NEI CONFRONTI DEI
COMPAGNI DEL SINDACATO E DELLA SINISTRA JUGOSLAVA
La situazione in Jugoslavia � gravissima e peggiora di ora in ora.
Il saccheggio del palazzo del Parlamento il 5 ottobre, la distruzione della
sede della TV di Stato, l'attacco alla sede del partito socialista serbo a
Belgrado non sono stati episodi isolati, legati alla manifestazione di
piazza.
Le aggressioni di tipo squadristico nei confronti dei militanti e delle
sedi dei partiti di sinistra e del sindacato Samostalni in tutta la
Jugoslavia si susseguono di ora in ora con crescente intensit�. Si tratta
in tutta evidenza di un piano sistematico, volto a distruggere tutte le
organizzazioni politiche e sindacali che rifiutano le politiche
neoliberiste e anticomuniste del programma della "Opposizione democratica
serba" di Kostunica.
Denunciamo in particolare, sulla base di testimonianze dirette, le minacce,
le intimidazioni, le aggressioni compiute a Kragujevac nei confronti dei
rappresentanti del sindacato Samostalni della Zastava, che conosciamo bene
per la loro integrit� e coerenza morale e politica e con i quali avevamo
avviato diverse iniziative di solidariet�.
Luned� 10 ottobre sono stati devastati gli uffici dei rappresentanti
sindacali della Zastava IVECO, della Zastava-automobili. Gli squadristi
hanno imposto le dimissioni, tra gli altri, dei compagni Milan Doncic e
Sreten Milicevic, segretario del sindacato Samostalni della Zastava,che il
mondo dell'associazionismo e del sindacalismo conosce bene, per i loro
interventi in Italia.
Pesantissime intimidazioni e minacce sono state rivolte nei confronti del
presidente del sindacato Samostalni, la compagna Ruzica, cui � stato
intimato di abbandonare la presidenza del sindacato. Con la violenza e col
terrore i nuovi "democratici" si stanno impadronendo delle sedi e delle
strutture del sindacato.
La compagna Rajka Veljovic e tutto il gruppo impegnato nell'organizzazione
delle "adozioni a distanza" insieme con associazioni italiane e con la
CGIL-Lombardia, corrono seri pericoli per la propria incolumit� fisica.
Tutte le emittenti radio-televisive, i giornali sono controllate dai
"democratici", i rappresentanti dei partiti di sinistra (che pure hanno
ottenuto oltre il 35% di consensi elettorali) non hanno nessun accesso
all'informazione.
Nelle fabbriche, negli uffici pubblici, in tutte le strutture dell'apparato
statale si stanno imponendo, a colpi di spranghe e a fucilate, i nuovi
dirigenti "democratici".
Il parlamento serbo � stato costretto con la forza a sciogliersi.
E' questa la nuova "democrazia" jugoslava?
Facciamo appello alle associazioni di solidariet�, ai sindacati, a tutti i
sinceri democratici a mobilitarsi perch� cessi la campagna sistematica di
violenze e intimidazioni contro chi si oppone alle politiche neoliberiste
in Jugoslavia.
---
JOURNAL DE BELGRADE - Lundi 9 octobre, 13 heures
Les violences dont on ne parle pas
Vers une nouvelle �preuve de force?
MICHEL COLLON
On va sans doute vers une nouvelle manifestation de rue, sans doute plus
limit�e. Le
parlement de Serbie se r�unit aujourd'hui et l'opposition DOS a lanc� un
ultimatum: si
la loi sur les universit�s n'est pas abolie (une loi qui visait �
emp�cher l'organisation
des activit�s d'opposition en utilisant l'universit�), alors il y aura
manifestation et le
parlement pourrait �tre sinon envahi, en tout cas encercl� et bloqu�.
Mais le v�ritable enjeu est ailleurs. DOS a obtenu le pr�sident, mais
aucun
gouvernement. Ni celui de Yougoslavie o� on s'attend � un gouvernement
des
socialistes serbes (Milosevic) et mont�n�grins (Bulatovic), ni celui de
Serbie qui est en
place depuis plusieurs ann�es et pour encore un an en principe, et qui
refl�te les anciens
rapports de force �lectoraux.
Quelle majorit� au parlement serbe? L'imbroglio total.
Au parlement serbe, le parti le plus puissant (83 si�ges sur 255), ce
sont les radicaux
(droite nationaliste) de Seselj alli�s � Milosevic. Mais ce parti a �t�
lamin� aux
derni�res �lections, il est menac� de disparition et ses dirigeants
cherchent
d�sesp�r�ment comment le sauver. Pour maintenir l'alliance actuelle, ils
viennent de
formuler une s�rie d'exigences jug�es irr�alistes par un dirigeant du
SPS que j'ai
rencontr�. Par exemple, la loi �lectorale serait r�vis�e pour faire du
pays une seule
grande circonscription, ce qui assurerait aux radicaux de plus grandes
chances d'obtenir
encore des �lus. De ce gouvernement le SPO de Draskovic - lui aussi en
voie de
disparition) s'est retir� et il ne veut pas qu'il subsiste. En r�alit�,
ces deux partis sont
coinc�s: comme DOS les a �vinc�s dans l'�lectorat, ils seraient liquid�s
en cas
d'�lections. Alors, SPO et radicaux sont tent�s de former ensemble un
gouvernement
serbe - sans nouvelles �lections, et sans les socialistes - qui pourrait
durer un an.
Mais d'autre part, ces deux partis avancent surtout leurs exigences pour
faire monter
les ench�res dans des n�gociations avec DOS et avec le SPS. Sans aucun
principe, ils
essaient seulement d'obtenir le peuple, d'un c�t� ou de l'autre.
Les grandes manoeuvres politiciennes battent leur plein �galement autour
de la
constitution du nouveau gouvernement f�d�ral. Le partenaire
indispensable et
fortement courtis�, c'est le parti socialiste mont�n�grin. DOS lui a
imm�diatement fait
des avances. Seulement, dans un an, auront lieu les �lections de la
r�publique du
Mont�n�gro, et dans ce pays, les �lections des r�publiques sont plus
importantes encore
en termes de comp�tences et de budgets. Les socialistes mont�n�grins ont
le vent en
poupe et pourraient l'emporter face � la droite pro-am�ricaine de
Djukanovic. Mais
s'ils s'alliaient avec la droite serbe de DOS qui a exactement le m�me
programme style
FMI que Djukanovic, leur image de marque serait d�t�rior�e. Voil�
pourquoi ils ont
plutot choisi le SPS de Milosevic comme partenaire. Tout a �t� n�goci�.
Il ne reste
qu'un obstacle.
Evinc�, DOS a commenc� � contester le mandat de 18 d�put�s socialistes.
En avancant
l'argument que la Cour Constitutionnelle n'a pas accept� les r�sultats
de ces
circonscriptions mais... pour l'election pr�sidentielle! Par contre, aux
parlementaires,
les repr�sentants de DOS avaient sign� tous les proc�s-verbaux de
r�sultats et il n'y a
pas eu de plainte devant la Commission de contr�le. Pour le Kosovo,
l'argument est que
les bureaux de vote ont �t� ferm�s � 16 heures, au lieu de 20 heures, vu
les conditions
d'ins�curit� y r�gnant. Tout cela parait tir� par les cheveux et
poursuivre un autre but.
Une commission du parlement devrait bientot v�rifier la validit� de ces
18 mandats.
SPS et SNP y sont en majorit� et le r�sultat semble acquis.
Loin des cam�ras, les violences de Djindjic
C'est peut-etre justement pour ca que DOS maintient la pression. Quelle
sont les
m�thodes employ�es? Menaces de manifestations et de blocages des
institutions
l�gales, violences physiques et menaces contre les membres du parti
socialiste et
diverses institutions d'Etat, prises de contr�le par la force de
certaines entreprises.
Derri�re la figure symbolique de Kostunica qui occupe le devant de la
sc�ne, c'est
Zoran Djindjic qui organise tout cela. Vendu depuis longtemps aux
int�rets allemands,
puis am�ricains, comme chacun le sait ici, Djindjic, largement m�pris�,
s'est servi de
Kostunica pour vaincre Milosevic, et � pr�sent, il se rue vers le
pouvoir r�el. Par la
violence.
Le si�ge belgradois du parti socialiste a �t� compl�tement d�truit.
Kostunica a envoy�
un photographe sur place, qui s'est montr� indign�. Des maisons de
membres du SPS
ont �t� incendi�es. De nombreuses entreprises - par l'exemple l'usine de
tabac Din -
ont �t� plac�es de force entre les mains de gens de Djindjic. Ainsi que
de nombreuses
soci�t�s de joint-ventures (collaborant avec des compagnies etrang�res).
Mais des institutions officielles sont elles aussi carr�ment
confisqu�es. La banque des
paiements, celle par laquelle passent tous les transferts financiers, a
�t� mise sous
contr�le de Djindjic. En ce moment, DOS expulse de force le directeur de
l'hopital des
enfants, Monsieur Scepanovic, tr�s comp�tent, mais coupable d'etre
membre du parti
socialiste. D'autres �v�nements de ce genre ne peuvent encore �tres
racont�s car les
victimes ont trop peur. Mais les faits ont ete consign�s et s'il
arrivait quelque chose, ils
seraient diffus�s. Et en province, les actes de terreur sont encore bien
plus importants
qu'� Belgrade o� il faut pr�server une image pr�sentable.
Ce n'est �videmment pas pour ca que le peuple a vot�. Il a vot� pour
vivre mieux, et
parce que la majorit� avait perdu confiance en Milosevic. C'est donc
aussi pour
empecher que ces faits soient connnus de l'opinion que tous les m�dias
ont �t� plac�s
d�s le d�but sous le controle de DOS, plus pr�cis�ment de Djindjic.
C'est DOS et l'Ouest qui ont instaur� le monopole des m�dias!
C'est Djindjic, pas Kostunica, qui a organis�, tr�s efficacement,
l'occupation des m�dias
publics: RTS, l'agence de presse Tanjug, le quotidien Politika. Avec la
complicit� de
certains responsables de ces m�dias, et en �cartant de force les autres
journalistes ou en
les soumettant � de tr�s fortes pressions.
R�sultat: quand vous ouvrez aujourd'hui la t�l�, vous voyez la meme
chose partout:
Kostunica et DOS, ou bien DOS et Kostunica. Rien d'autre. Jamais un
point de vue de
l'autre camp. Ce reproche �tait formul� auparavant contre Milosevic.
Mais, sous
Milosevic, meme s'il y eu des suspensions � certaines p�riodes,
l'opposition avait trois
fois plus de m�dias que le pouvoir et cinq fois plus que le pouvoir au
niveau des m�dias
�lectroniques. Et aussi ses TV. La population recevait constamment ces
opinions-l�,
qui l'ont d'ailleurs grandement influenc�e A pr�sent, toute l'info est
control�e par un
seul parti, et on appelle ca la "d�mocratie".
Avec d'ailleurs, des m�thodes psychologico-m�diatiques tr�s modernes
dont on voit
qu'elles ont �t� pr�par�es depuis longtemps. Les dollars de Washington
(voir nos
pr�c�dents articles) ont �t� investis pour pr�parer ces m�dias modernes.
Que va-t-il se passer? DOS va essayer de maintenir la pression pour
empecher le
fonctionnement des gouvernements qu'il ne controlerait pas. Soit par des
manifestations et des affrontements, mais la plupart des gens ici
souhaitent la fin des
violences et le retour au calme. Soit par des obstructions
institutionnelles comme celles
d�crites plus haut. Plus le temps passe, moins ils pourront utiliser la
force. C'est du
moins ce que beaucoup esp�rent.
---
-----Original Message-----
From: Ranko Bojanic <bojanic@...-state.edu>
Date: Monday, October 09, 2000 8:41 PM
Subject: SN607:Obavestenje za javnost SPS
>
>
>
>Na mom kompjuteru donji clanak je bio vrlo necitak zbog
>upotrebe "high ASCII" slova za nasa slova c', c^, s^,
>z^ i dj. Nadam se da ce ova v erzija biti mnogo citkija
>Ranko
>
>
>
>OBAVESTENJE ZA JAVNOST
>
>U Beogradu i sirom Srbije nasilje i napadi nad clanovima i
>imovinom Socijalisticke partije Srbije ne prestaju. Po metodu
>organizovanja i nacinu izvrsenja u potpunosti podsecaju na
>akcije jurisnika nacista koje su ovi preduzimali protiv
>levicara u zoru nastajanja nemackog fasizma. Pripadnici DOS-a
>fizicki napadaju clanove rukovodstva SPS-a, zastrasuju
>clanove i pristalice SPS-a fizickim pretnjama, a preko telefona
>anonimno prete zenama i deci socijalista.
>
>Vesto koristeci socijalno nezadovoljstvo radnika, DOS
>organizuje i preduzima nasilnicke protivzakonite akcije
>smenjivanja i proganjanja direktora koji su clanovi SPS-a, ali
>samo u uglednim, poslovno uspesnim i perspektivnim preduzecima.
>
>U Kragujevcu, jurisnici DOS-a su napali, vezali i deset casova
>maltretirali clana IO GO SPS Slavicu Djukic-Dejanovic. Deset
>casova neprekidno su je maltretirali ne bi li je naterali da na
>TV Kragujevac da izjavu kako se odrice svog clanstva u SPS-u.
>Posto nije popustila pred pretnjama, oslobodili su je i
>izrucili pijanoj razularenoj masi. Desetine huligana su je
>samarali, sutirali, pljuvali i psovali.
>
>U Nisu je tesko pretucen radnik Elektrodistribucije Dragisa
>Vucic, novi odbornik SPS u SO Nisa. On je zavrsio u bolnici
>posto su ga na njegovom radnom mestu, u krugu
>Elektrodistribucije, njegove kolege - njih stotinak - bukvalno
>lincovali.
>
>Nocas je u Beogradu ponovo napadnuto sediste Gradske
>organizacije SPS-a. Ovog puta, posto nije bilo vise niceg da
>se opljacka, prostorije su zapalili kako bi bile u potpunosti
>neupotrebljive. U opstinskim odborima Palilule, Vracara, Starog
>Grada i Zvezdare prostorije su totalno unistene i sve vrednosti
>- namestaj i kompjuterska oprema opljackani.
>
>U Boru su demolirane prostorije Opstinskog i Okruznog odbora
>SPS.
>
>U Arilju kamenovali su zgradu OO SPS i sekirama razvalili vrata.
>
>Po povratku iz svog rusilackog pohoda na Beograd, u Kikindi su
>pristalice DOS-a napali Klub Mladih socijalista. Porazbijali su
>prozore i vrata, ali ih je prisustvo clanova SPS u zgradi
>sprecilo da iznesu vrednu opremu Internet kluba Mladih
>socijalista, koja je najverovatnije bila pravi razlog napada.
>
>U Kovacici su pristalice DOS-a skinuli zastave sa zgrade
>Opstinskog odbora SPS a onda ih zapalili na Trgu u centru grada.
>
>Sediste OO SPS u Sremskoj Mitrovici je i druge noci pretrpelo
>vandalizam, kada su ponovo demolirani prozori i vrata zgrade
>SPS-a. U toku jucerasnjeg dana, u Pecincima pripadnici DOS-a
>su upali u prostorije OO SPS i Opstine i promenili brave na
>ulaznim vratima.
>
>06. oktobar 2000 15,00 SAOPSTENJE Iako je Vojislav Kostunica u
>vise navrata u svojim obracanjima javnosti naglasavao da nece
>biti revansizma prema clanovima i simpatizerima levice i da
>pristalice DOS-a postuju i tolerisu drugacija misljenja od
>njihovog (sto je jedna od osnovnih odrednica demokratije), na
>Socijalisticku partiju Srbije u poslednja tri dana srucio se
>rusilacki bezumni talas nasilja kojeg je organizovala
>demokratska opozicija.
>
>Prema prvim informacijama, napadnuta su, a negde porazbijana i
>opljackana sedista Socijalisticke partije Srbije i ugrozeni
>zivoti clanova rukovodstva SPS u Beogradu, Lajkovcu, Leskovcu,
>Prokuplju, Vlasotincu, Uzicu, Aleksincu, Pirotu, Smederevu,
>Raskoj, Kragujevcu, Pancevu, Novom Sadu, Temerinu, Adi,
>Kanjizi, Senti, Sremskoj Mitrovici, Zrenjaninu...
>
>U Beogradu unisteno je i opljackano sediste Gradskog odbora
>SPS Beograda (POGLEDAJTE FOTO ALBUM) i prostorije opstinskih
>odbora SPS u vise beogradskih centralnih opstina.
>
>U toku noci izmedju 5. i 6-og oktobra demonstranti DOS-a nasilno
>su upali u zgradu Privredne komore u Leskovcu. Polupali su sve
>prozore zgrade, pokrali kompjutersku i drugu imovinu, a ono sto
>nisu mogli da ponesu sa sobom unistili; Nasilno su upali u
>prostorije Okruznog odbora SPS Jablanickog okruga, demolirali
>kancelarije i pokrali opremu, polupali prozore i ostetili zgradu
>Skupstine opstine. Prvo su opljackali i odneli sve sto su
>mogli a zatim zapalili kucu, garazu i kola nacelnika
>Jablanickog okruga Zivojina Stefanovica.
>
>Nocas su demolirane prostorije Okruznog odbora SPS i
>Opstinskog odbora SPS Prokuplje.
>
>U Vlasotincu demonstranti su polupali prostorije OO SPS i
>zapalili prostorije JUL-a.
>
>Demonstranti su provalili u Opstinski odbor SPS u Smederevu,
>pokrali sve sto je bilo u prostorijama i opustosili opremu
>Radija "S".
>
>U napadu na sediste SPS-a u Uzicu porazbijana su stakla zgrade.
>
>U Lajkovacu demonstranti su demolirali Zadruznu stedionicu i
>zadruzni kafic. Usli su u prostorije lokalnog radija, razbili
>ulazna vrata i pokrali deo opreme.
>
>Demonstranti su provalili u Opstinski odbor SPS, i pokusali da
>razbijaju i pljackaju ali nisu uspeli da izbace clanove SPS iz
>njihovih prostorija. Slicno su pokusali i sa televizijom SPS-a.
>
>U Kragujevcu demonstranti su usli u zgradu Doma samoupravljaca
>gde je smesten Okruzni odbor SPS, Gradski odbor SPS i TV
>"Globus", medjutim, policija je sprecila vece nasilje.
>
>U Sremskoj Mitrovici razbijena su vrata i prozori na Opstinskom
>odboru SPS.
>
>U Pancevu je skinuta tabla i polupani prozori sedista
>Opstinskog odbora SPS.
>
>Demostranti su razbili ulazna vrata na zgradi Gradskog odbora SPS
>u Novom Sadu, i pokusali su da demoliraju zgradu Pokrajinskog
>odbora SPS Vojvodine.
>
>U Temerinu upali su u prostorije Radio Temerina i nasilno
>preuzeli ovu radio stanicu.
>
>U Adi demonstranti, predvodjeni predstavnicima Saveza
>vojvodjanskih Madjara, napali su kucu predsednika Opstinskog
>odbora SPS Tomic Ognjana, uglednog prosvetnog radnika. Policija
>je kasno intervenisala tako da je kuci naneta velika materijalna
>steta.
>
>Grupa huligana pokusala je da provali u prostorije Opstinskog
>odbora SPS u Zrenjaninu. Razbijena su ulazna vrata i nekoliko
>prozora zgrade.
>
>Napadnuta je kuca nacelnika Srednjebanatskog okruga Ljube
>Slijepcevica. Razbijeni su prozori i srusena ograda. Njihovo
>divljanje sprecila je policija.
>
>I pored uveravanja prvaka Saveza vojvodjanskih Ma��ara da nece
>biti rusilackih napada i uznemiravanja gradjana koji drugacije
>misle, u Kanjizi su napadnute prostorije OO SPS. Ne prestaje se
>sa telefonskim pretnjama gradjanima koji su za mir i toleranciju,
>a posebno Madjarima koji su clanovi ili simpatizeri SPS.
>
>Ovakve vrste uznemiravanja, verbalnih napada i pretnji primenom
>fizicke sile nad gradjanima prisutno je ne samo u gradovima
>Vojvodine, vec i u svim drugim gradovima sirom Srbije gde su
>pristalice DOS-a odrzale svoju Vartolomejsku noc.
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
109 TELEVIDEO Lu 09 Ott 00:48:01
COSI' HO CACCIATO SLOBO
lla testa di un commando di duemila
u mi i, il sindaco di Cacak sostiene di
aver avuto un ruolo decisivo nel crollo
del regime di Milosevic.
Velimir Ilic, incontrando oggi i gior-
nalisti, afferma di aver preparato gli
assalti al Parlamento e alla se e$della
tv federale con contatti segreti avuti
con esponenti delle Forze armate e del-
l Polizia durante i momenti ruciali.
La rivo ta avrebbe quindi avuto una
guida precisa. "I primi poliziotti che
solidarizzavano con i manifestanti era-
no miei uomini travestiti", svela.
Ultim'ora 101 Prima Pag 10
8 octobre 2000
Source: AFP
Le maire de Cacak, Velimir Ilic,vient de reconna�tre avoir �t�, avec un
"commando" de plus de 2.000 hommes, � l'origine de l'assaut jeudi du
parlement et de la t�l�vision � Belgrade, une action pr�m�dit�e visant
�
provoquer la chute de Slobodan Milosevic.
"Notre action avait �t� pr�par�e d'avance. Parmi mes hommes il y avait
des
ex-parachutistes, des anciens officiers de l'arm�e et de la police ainsi
que des gens ayant combattu au sein des forces sp�ciales", a racont�
d'une
voix pos�e � quelques journalistes le maire de Cacak.
"Nombre d'entre nous avions des gilets pare-balles et des armes",
dit-il.
"Notre but �tait tr�s clair, prendre le contr�le des institutions cl�s
du
r�gime, dont le parlement et la t�l�vision. [..] J'ai �t� constamment au
t�l�phone avec un g�n�ral de l'arm�e ainsi qu'avec une partie de la
hi�rarchie du minist�re de l'Int�rieur. Pour l'instant, je pr�f�re ne
pas
divulguer leurs noms".
Enfin, Mr Ilic d�voile que les sc�nes de "fraternisation" entre des
manifestants et des policiers �taient une mise en sc�ne : "C'�taient nos
hommes v�tus d'uniformes de la police.". Bien �tudi�: comme le souligne
la
d�p�che de l'AFP qui rapporte l'interview, ces sc�nes "ont donn�
courage
aux protestataires" [pour ne pas dire:"ont d�courag� les partisans de
Milosevic"], et "ont d�stabilis� les forces encore fid�les �
Milosevic".
La v�rit� sort donc petit � petit sur la soi-disant insurrection
populaire.
Il est certain qu'on en apprendra d'avantage � l'avenir - notamment sur
les
'conseils' qui ont � coup s�r �t� prodigu�s aux Ilic et autres
'd�mocrates'.
Collabo de p�re en fils?
Velimir Ilic tient � souligner le pass� anti-communiste de sa famille :
"Mon p�re a �t� pendu par les �rouges� en 1943". C'est une remarquable
r�f�rence...Il ne pr�cise pas ce qui a justifi� la pendaison par les
partisans de Mr Ilic p�re pendant l'occupation nazie.
Dans le m�me esprit, V. Ilic se vante d'avoir d�sert� pendant la guerre
d'agression de l'OTAN contre la Yougoslavie au printemps 99, et de
s'�tre
plut�t cach� pendant 40 jours dans la for�t. Voil�, comme dirait M.
Clinton, "le peuple [..] qui a repris en main son pays arm� seulement
de
son courage, de ses principes et de son patriotisme".
---
COME VLADAN DUGONJIC HA DISARMATO SPOMENKA JOVIC
"Ho atteso per 10 anni. Avevamo provato a fare lo stesso gia' il 9 marzo
1991"
(sintesi di un articolo uscito sul giornale GLAS, vicino alla coalizione
liberal-nazionalista DOS, il giorno 7/10/2000)
"Con questo aggeggio ogni sera attorno alle 19:30 lei turbava la mia
anima": lo dice mostrando il microfono, il suo "trofeo", Vladan Dugonjic,
un ingegnere 40enne della cittadina di Lipolist presso Sabac. "Questo l'ho
tolto io personalmente a Spomenka Jovic. Mentre ancora bruciava il
Parlamento, loro a sole poche centinaia di metri di distanza stavano
montando i pezzi per il secondo telegiornale. Sono volato attraverso il
piano terra in fiamme, sono arrivato non so su che piano e li ho trovati
proprio sul luogo del delitto. Non credeva a quello che le stava
succedendo: le ho strappato il microfono dalla mano, le ho mollato uno
schiaffone - e quasta e' la prima volta in vita mia che alzo le mani su
di una dama [sic]... La potevo anche ammazzare ma sono riuscito a
contenere la mia rabbia, le ho sputato dopo averle dato lo schiaffo e le
ho detto: "Che Iddio d'ora in poi ti giudichi, io il mio l'ho fatto".
In quel momento ho visto che trascinavano fuori Komrakov, per
"accarezzarlo"... Ho visto Milanovic, si e' raggomitolato come un
poveraccio. Erano cosi' miseri che per un momento mi hanno fatto ribrezzo
Erano cosi' piccoli che era di troppo persino colpirli"...
Dugonjic continua descrivendo euforicamente il pestaggio di alcuni
giornalisti da parte di un gruppo giunto dalla cittadina di Cacak.
"Nella mia mente c'era solo un pensiero: non dovevo rientrare a mani vuote
nella mia cittadina", percio' si e' portato via il microfono. Per nove
anni "mi sono rammaricato di non averlo fatto prima, allora non c'eravamo
riusciti e solamente adesso la vita e' ritornata in me".
Quattro giorni sulle barricate presso Sabac, quattro notti a protestare in
piazza, ma ha capito che questo non era sufficiente e che doveva recarsi
nella capitale. E cosi' fu.
===
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eCircle ti offre una nuova opportunita:
Il tuo sondaggio sul web sugli argomenti che preferisci
Facile da gestire e con rappresentazioni grafiche dei risultati.
E' facile, veloce e gratuito!
Da oggi su
http://www.ecircle.de/ad157031/www.ecircle.it
Al capo dei golpisti della RF di Jugoslavia
Vojislav Kostunica
Signor capo,
In questa occasione mi rivolgo a lei come patriota serbo, per esternare la
mia personale nausea rispetto al colpo di Stato che lei ha compiuto ieri.
Le ricordo anche che, cosi' come l'ha messa al potere, la CIA
la togliera' di mezzo ancor piu' facilmente. Lei e' stato scelto dal
servizio centrale d'informazione degli Stati Uniti d'America perche' si e'
dimostrato assolutamente incapace sia sul piano professionale che su
quello politico. Come uomo di legge (1) lei si e' del tutto squalificato
ieri, quando e' entrato con la forza nel Parlamento per essere poi
acclamato a Presidente della Jugoslavia dalla folla urlante. Per quanto mi
ricordo, lei non ha mai riconosciuto questo Stato (2). Lei si e' gia'
dimenticato di quando invitava i cittadini della Repubblica Federale di
Jugoslavia a non recarsi alle elezioni precedenti. Per dieci anni, da
quando e' alla guida del Partito Democratico della Serbia, lei non e'
riuscito ad andare oltre ad un partito-accozzaglia. Infine, sarebbe
opportuno che lei la smettesse di fregiarsi del titolo di Prof. Dott.
perche' tale lei non e'. Lei con i suoi 54 anni e' solamente un
collaboratore scientifico, e noi questi li chiamiamo dottori-"trute" (3).
Che iddio l'aiuti
Jela Jovanovic, laureato in storia dell'arte
NOTE DEI TRADUTTORI:
(1) Kostunica e' avvocato.
(2) Kostunica si e' sempre definito solo "serbo", e si e' sempre distinto per
le sue idee antijugoslave, dalla opposizione alla Jugoslavia
multinazionale e socialista fino alla contestazione della legittimita'
della RF di Jugoslavia, fondata nel 1992. Il giorno dell'assalto al Parlamento federale Kostunica parlando alla folla ha esordito con "Buona sera Serbia libera", e non "Buona sera Jugoslavia" libera come sarebbe stato logico e come e' stato falsamente riportato da molti giornali italiani il giorno successivo.
(3) Traducibile con: pseudo-dottori, dottori falliti o "dottori dei miei
stivali".
---
Subject: VODJI HUNTE SAVEZNE REPUBLIKE
JUGOSLAVIJE
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 21:35:02 +0200
From: "Mrs. Jela Jovanovic, Secretary General"
To: "DSS" <info@...>
VODJI HUNTE SAVEZNE REPUBLIKE JUGOSLAVIJE
VOJISLAVU KOSTINICI
Gospodine Vodjo
Ovom porukom Vam se obracam kao srpski rodoljub, da izrazim licno gadjenje
zbog puca koji ste izvrsili juce. Ujedno vas potsecam kako vas je CIA lako
dovela na vlast, jos ce vas brze skinuti sa vlasti. Vi ste odabrani od
strane Centralne Obavestajne Agencije , Sjedinjenih Americkih Drzava jer
ste se dokazali da ste potpuno nesposobni, kako na profesionalnom tako i na
politickom planu Juce ste se obrukali kao pravnik, kada ste prvo upalili
zgradu Parlamenta, pa izvikani od stane rulje proglaseni za tzv. predsednika
Jugoslavije.Koliko me secanje sluzi nikada istu niste priznali. Da li ste
zaboravili da ste pozivali gradjane Savezne Republike Jugoslavije da ne
izadju na prve izbore? Za deset godina koliko vodite Demokratsku stranku
Srbije niste uspeli da odmaknete dalje od kombi stranke.
Na kraju bilo bi uputno da vas ne tituliraju sa prof.dr jer vi to niste. Vi
ste visi naucni saradnik sa 54 godine takve oslovljavam sa doktore trute.
Neka vam je Bog u pomoci
Jela Jovanovic, diplomirani istoricar umetnosti
===
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Da oggi su eCircle - Filesharing.
Puoi disporre in ogni gruppo di 20 MB
per documenti, file musicali, films e foto.
Condividili con i soci della tua communita!
http://www.ecircle.de/ad176731/www.ecircle.it
Vojislav Kostunica
Signor capo,
In questa occasione mi rivolgo a lei come patriota serbo, per esternare la
mia personale nausea rispetto al colpo di Stato che lei ha compiuto ieri.
Le ricordo anche che, cosi' come l'ha messa al potere, la CIA
la togliera' di mezzo ancor piu' facilmente. Lei e' stato scelto dal
servizio centrale d'informazione degli Stati Uniti d'America perche' si e'
dimostrato assolutamente incapace sia sul piano professionale che su
quello politico. Come uomo di legge (1) lei si e' del tutto squalificato
ieri, quando e' entrato con la forza nel Parlamento per essere poi
acclamato a Presidente della Jugoslavia dalla folla urlante. Per quanto mi
ricordo, lei non ha mai riconosciuto questo Stato (2). Lei si e' gia'
dimenticato di quando invitava i cittadini della Repubblica Federale di
Jugoslavia a non recarsi alle elezioni precedenti. Per dieci anni, da
quando e' alla guida del Partito Democratico della Serbia, lei non e'
riuscito ad andare oltre ad un partito-accozzaglia. Infine, sarebbe
opportuno che lei la smettesse di fregiarsi del titolo di Prof. Dott.
perche' tale lei non e'. Lei con i suoi 54 anni e' solamente un
collaboratore scientifico, e noi questi li chiamiamo dottori-"trute" (3).
Che iddio l'aiuti
Jela Jovanovic, laureato in storia dell'arte
NOTE DEI TRADUTTORI:
(1) Kostunica e' avvocato.
(2) Kostunica si e' sempre definito solo "serbo", e si e' sempre distinto per
le sue idee antijugoslave, dalla opposizione alla Jugoslavia
multinazionale e socialista fino alla contestazione della legittimita'
della RF di Jugoslavia, fondata nel 1992. Il giorno dell'assalto al Parlamento federale Kostunica parlando alla folla ha esordito con "Buona sera Serbia libera", e non "Buona sera Jugoslavia" libera come sarebbe stato logico e come e' stato falsamente riportato da molti giornali italiani il giorno successivo.
(3) Traducibile con: pseudo-dottori, dottori falliti o "dottori dei miei
stivali".
---
Subject: VODJI HUNTE SAVEZNE REPUBLIKE
JUGOSLAVIJE
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 21:35:02 +0200
From: "Mrs. Jela Jovanovic, Secretary General"
To: "DSS" <info@...>
VODJI HUNTE SAVEZNE REPUBLIKE JUGOSLAVIJE
VOJISLAVU KOSTINICI
Gospodine Vodjo
Ovom porukom Vam se obracam kao srpski rodoljub, da izrazim licno gadjenje
zbog puca koji ste izvrsili juce. Ujedno vas potsecam kako vas je CIA lako
dovela na vlast, jos ce vas brze skinuti sa vlasti. Vi ste odabrani od
strane Centralne Obavestajne Agencije , Sjedinjenih Americkih Drzava jer
ste se dokazali da ste potpuno nesposobni, kako na profesionalnom tako i na
politickom planu Juce ste se obrukali kao pravnik, kada ste prvo upalili
zgradu Parlamenta, pa izvikani od stane rulje proglaseni za tzv. predsednika
Jugoslavije.Koliko me secanje sluzi nikada istu niste priznali. Da li ste
zaboravili da ste pozivali gradjane Savezne Republike Jugoslavije da ne
izadju na prve izbore? Za deset godina koliko vodite Demokratsku stranku
Srbije niste uspeli da odmaknete dalje od kombi stranke.
Na kraju bilo bi uputno da vas ne tituliraju sa prof.dr jer vi to niste. Vi
ste visi naucni saradnik sa 54 godine takve oslovljavam sa doktore trute.
Neka vam je Bog u pomoci
Jela Jovanovic, diplomirani istoricar umetnosti
===
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Da oggi su eCircle - Filesharing.
Puoi disporre in ogni gruppo di 20 MB
per documenti, file musicali, films e foto.
Condividili con i soci della tua communita!
http://www.ecircle.de/ad176731/www.ecircle.it
>Liebe Leute,
>
>Gregory Elich, Balkan-Experte in den USA, der vor den Wahlen in
>Jugoslawien gewarnt hatte, daß die Nato ihren zweiten Angriff auf
>Jugoslawien vorbereitet (junge Welt vom 14. und 15.9.2000) gibt in einer
>Email-Mitteilung an Aktivisten der US-Friedensbewegung von Samstag, den
>7. Oktober 2000, folgende Einschätzung der aktuellen Lage:
>
>"Ich stimme voll zu, das dies in den kommenden Tagen der entscheidende
>Kampf sein wird. Die Linke hat eine solide Mehrheit in beiden Häusern
>des Parlaments gewonnen. Das ist eindeutig der Grund, warum Kostunica es
>abgelehnt hat, an der Stichwahl am 8. Oktober teilzunehmen, obgleich er
>sicher war, daß er gewinnen würde. Bei einem Sieg Kostunicas im zweiten
>Wahlgang gäbe es immer noch die linke Mehrheit in beiden Kammern; seine
>Möglichkeit, den sozialen Sektor abzubauen und das Land der NATO zu
>übergeben wären ernsthaft eingeschränkt. Der große Kampf wird sich darum
>drehen, ob die legal gewählten Vertreter ihre Sitze einnehmen können. In
>dieser Hinsicht ist es bezeichnend, daß DOS gestern abend angekündigt
>hat, daß man ein Krisen - Komitee bilden würde, um das Land zu
>"regieren".... Vermutlich bedeutet dies, daß beide Kammern entweder
>aufgelöst oder mit bedeutungslosen, trivialen Aufgaben beschäftigt
>werden, während die wirklichen Staatsgeschäfte durch dieses durch den
>Putsch eingesetzte Komitee geführt werden. Bezeichnend ist auch, daß bis
>letzte Woche Jugoslawien eine außerordentlich reiche und vielfältige
>Medienlandschaft hatte, wo alle Meinungen vertreten waren und mit weiter
>Verbreitung. Unter den Sozialisten waren die meisten Medien in den
>Händen der Rechten (und die meisten dieser Publikationen wurden vom
>Westen finanziert). Als Folge des Putsches dieser Woche ist nun die
>"Medienfreiheit" in Jugoslawien eingeführt , was bedeutet, das es keine
>Vielfalt mehr gibt. Tanjug, Politika, RTS und alle linken Medien sind
>beschlagnahmt und unter Kontrolle der rechten Opposition. Das ist das
>westliche Modell der "Medienfreiheit": man hat viele Wahlmöglichkeiten,
>man kann beliebig aus auswählen unter: rechts, oder rechts oder sogar
>rechts. Die Beschlagnahme der Medien war wichtig, weil nun viele der
>Machenschaften ohne Berichterstattung vor sich gehen können oder nur in
>entstellter Form präsentiert werden. Wir gewannen die erste Schlacht mit
>dem Triumph der Linken in beiden Kammern des Parlaments, aber wir
>verloren die nächsten drei Schlachten: den Putsch, der die Stichwahlen
>vom 8. Oktober beiseite schob, die Beschlagnahme der Medien und die
>Einsetzung eines Krisen - Komitees, um das Land zu regieren. Es bleibt
>abzuwarten, ob das Komitee regieren wird oder ob die Kammern regieren
>werden....und falls die letzteren, ob die legal gewählten Vertreter ihre
>Sitze einnehmen werden oder ob diese Sitze an jene übergeben werden, die
>dem Putsch freundlich gegenüberstehen."
>
>Aus "Emperor's Clothes"
>http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/sinclair/governin.htm
>ist zu entnehmen, "Was die Medien verschweigen."
>
>"(......) Zum ersten Mal haben Milosevics Sozialistische Partei und ihre
>Verbündeten eine absolute Mehrheit der Sitze sowohl im Ober- als auch im
>Unterhaus des Parlaments gewonnen. Die Ergebnisse der
>Präsidentschaftswahlen sind Gegenstand vieler (schlecht-informierter)
>Debatten. Aber niemand bestreitet die Ergebnisse für das Parlament. In
>Jugoslawien hatte die Regierung vor diesen Wahlen nur 64 Sitze von
>insgesamt 138 Sitzen im Unterhaus. Nun haben sie acht Sitze hinzu
>gewonnen und eine Mehrheit von drei Stimmen erreicht: 72 von 138
>Sitzen. Bisher mußte die Regierung eine Koalition mit einer der
>kleineren Parteien schmieden, wenn sie ein Gesetz verabschieden wollte.
>Mit dieser neuen Mehrheit im Unterhaus braucht sich die Regierung nicht
>länger auf eine schwankende Mehrheit zu stützen, um die erforderliche
>Gesetzgebung durchzusetzen. Die Regierung erzielte einen noch größeren
>Sieg im Wahlrennen für den Senat, das Oberhaus. Sie gewann sieben von 20
>Sitzen für Serbien und 19 von 20 für Montenegro. Die Opposition gewann
>gerade eben 10 von 40 Sitzen. Die Regierung verfehlte knapp die
>Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit. Die Regierungspartei von Milosevic erzielte einen
>großen Sieg, indem sie die Mehrheit sowohl im Unterhaus wie im Oberhaus
>gewann. Es ist dieses Ergebnis, das die Westmächte um jeden Preis
>ungeschehen machen wollen, und dabei selbst so weit gehen zu versuchen,
>einen Bürgerkrieg zu entfesseln oder eine Provokation zu inszenieren, um
>eine Invasion Jugoslawiens zu rechtfertigen."
>
>Sara Flounders vom IAC schlägt in ihrem Artikel (Anlage 1) den
>Aktivisten der internationalen Tribunalbewegung vor, eine Internationale
>Untersuchungskommission über die Einmischung des Westens in Jugoslawien
>zu bilden.
>
>Die Internationale Leninistische Strömung in Wien fordert in ihrer
>Stellungnahme (Anlage 2) dazu auf, in Jugoslawien jene Kräfte zu
>unterstützen,
>
>"· die den Bürgerkrieg zu verhindern trachten, der von Kostunica, der
>Opposition und dem Westen angezettelt wird,
>· die die Unabhängigkeit und den Widerstand Jugoslawiens und Serbiens
>gegen die Nato und ihre Neue Weltordnung tragen und für die vollständige
>Durchführung der UN-Resolution 1244 und die spätere Wiedereingliederung
>des Kosovos nach Jugoslawien eintreten,
>· für soziale Gerechtigkeit und Gleichheit stehen und die neoliberalen
>Rezepte des IWF, der WTO und der Weltbank ablehnen
>· den multinationalen Charakter Jugoslawiens sichern."
>
>Folgende Texte werden in den Anlagen dokumentiert:
>
>MIT WEICHEM GELD UND HARTEN DROHUNGEN:
>JUGOSLAWISCHE WAHLEN VON USA UND NATO GESTOHLEN.
>Von Sara Flounders
>Aus: "Workers World newspaper" v. 5.10.2000
>- Anlage 1 -
>( i s t b i s h e r a u f D e u t s c h n o c h n i c h t e r s c
>h i e n e n !)
>
>DEN VON KOSTUNICA UND DEM WESTEN ANGEZETTELTEN
>BÜRGERKRIEG VERHINDERN
>Erklärung des Exekutivkomitees der Internationalen Leninistischen
>Strömung
>Wien, 27. September 2000
>- Anlage 2 -
>
>AUSVERKAUF VERHANDELT
>BELGRADER OPPOSITIONSFÜHRER TRAFEN SICH MIT IWF-VERTRETERN IN BULGARIEN
>Von Michel Chossudovsky und Jared Israel
>Aus: junge Welt v. 04.10.2000
>Quelle des Originalartikels:
>http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/11.htm)
>- Anlage 3 -
>
>DEMOKRATISCHE UND FAIRE BEDINGUNGEN IM LAND SELBST,
>MASSIVE MANIPULATIONS- UND ERPRESSUNGSVERSUCHE VON AUSSEN -
>Fazit der deutschen Beobachter der Wahlen am 24. September 2000 in
>Jugoslawien
>- Anlage 4 -
>
>
>
>Mit internationalistischen Grüßen
>Klaus v. Raussendorff
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>Anti-Imperialistische Korrespondenz (AIK)
>Redaktion: Klaus von Raussendorff
>Postfach 210172, 53156 Bonn
>Tel.&Fax: 0228 – 34.68.50
>Email: raussendorff@...
>
>Anti-Imperialistische Online-Korrespondenz
>Webmaster: Dieter Vogel
>http://home.t-online.de/home/aik-web/
>Email: aik-web@...
>
>Wer die AIK nicht empfangen möchte,
>schicke bitte eine Mail mit dem Betreff
>"unsubscribe" an raussendorff@...
>
>*************************************************************************
>
>Anlage 1
>
>MIT WEICHEM GELD UND HARTEN DROHUNGEN:
>JUGOSLAWISCHE WAHLEN VON USA UND NATO GESTOHLEN.
>Von Sara Flounders
>
>
>Am 26. September gab die staatliche Wahlkommission in Jugoslawien die
>Ergebnisse der Wahlen vom 24. September bekannt. Der von der
>US-Regierung und der Europäische Union unterstützte Kandidat Vojislav
>Kostunica erhielt 48 Prozent gegenüber 40 Prozent für Präsident Slobodan
>Milosevic.
>
>Da keiner der Kandidaten über 50 Prozent erhielt, ist eine Stichwahl für
>den 8. Oktober angesetzt.
>
>Kostunicas unmittelbare Reaktion war die Weigerung, an der Stichwahl
>teilzunehmen und die Forderung, daß Milosevic die Niederlage eingesteht.
>Bill Clinton, der britische Außenminister Robin Cook und andere
>NATO-Führer, die Jugoslawien 1999 bombardiert hatten, forderten von
>Milosevic ebenfalls das Eingeständnis der Niederlage.
>
>Der erste Punkt, dessen sich die ganze internationale Bewegung, die sich
>dem NATO-Krieg gegen Jugoslawien widersetzte, bewußt sein muß, ist, daß
>die jugoslawischen Wahlen nicht "frei und fair" waren. Der Imperialismus
>hat die Wahlen durch himmelschreiende Erpressung, Bestechung und
>Einmischung gestohlen.
>
>Die Wahlen werfen eine grundsätzliche Frage auf. Wird Jugoslawien den
>westlichen Banken und Unternehmen ausgeliefert werden? Werden die
>Vermögenswerte der Industrieunternehmen ausgeschlachtet und
>verschleudert werden, wie in jedem anderen Land Osteuropas, in Russland
>und in den ehemaligen Sowjetrepubliken geschehen? Wird die Mehrheit der
>Bevölkerung zu einem Leben unterhalb der Armutsgrenze verurteilt werden?
>
>Die Wahlen vom 24. September umfaßten drei Ebenen der Stimmabgabe. Außer
>den Präsidentschaftswahlen gab es auch Kommunalwahlen, in denen die
>US-gestützte Opposition viele Städte und Ortschaften gewann.
>
>Und es gab auch eine Wahl zum jugoslawischen Bundesparlament. Die
>Koalition der Vereinigten Linken, der Sozialistischen Partei Serbiens
>und der SPS-Schwesterpartei in Montenegro erzielte eine starke Mehrheit
>in beiden Kammern. In Montenegro war sie ohne Gegner, da die
>pro-westliche Regierung sich der Wahlbeteiligung enthielt. Nach
>jugoslawischem Recht hat das Parlament mehr Rechte als der Präsident und
>bestimmt die Regierung durch Wahl des Premierministers.
>
>Aber ein Rückschlag für Milosevic bei den Präsidentschaftswahlen setzt
>mehr aufs Spiel als das Schicksal eines Einzelnen. Er war das Hauptziel
>des Krieges der USA und der NATO und der imperialistischen Weltmächte;
>und damit ergab sich, daß er den jugoslawischen Widerstand symbolisiert.
>Darüber hinaus stand er im Mittelpunkt der Koalition der Kräfte, die
>Jugoslawien während der 78 Tage der Bombardements führten.
>
>All die sozialen Errungenschaften eines unabhängigen Landes, das aus der
>imperialistischen Sklaverei ausgebrochen ist und jahrelang gegen
>Einkreisung und Krieg stand gehalten hat, sind nun in Gefahr.
>
>Westliche Einmischung verfälschte die Wahlen
>
>In dieser Wahl benutzten die Regierungen der USA und der EU jeden nur
>möglichen schmutzigen Trick, korrupte Machenschaften und Schmiergelder,
>und sie brüsteten sich noch damit. Bombendrohungen, Versprechungen, die
>neunjährigen Sanktionen einzustellen, Einschüchterungen und
>Militärmanöver heizten die Spannung an.
>
>Am Wahltag hielten das Pentagon und Kroatien ihre bis dahin größten
>gemeinsamen Truppenübungen, eine gemeinsame Landung auf einer Insel in
>der Adria in der Nähe von Montenegro, einem Teil Jugoslawiens, um eine
>Invasion zu simulieren. Fünfzehn britische Kriegsschiffe sind inzwischen
>ins Mittelmeer verlegt worden. Ein US-Flugzeugträger hat sich näher auf
>Montenegro zu bewegt.
>
>Die Grossmedien der USA, die New York Times am 20. September und die
>Washington Post am 19. September haben im Detail die genauen Beträge
>spezifiziert, die in die Parteien, Radiosender, Fernsehstationen und
>Zeitungen der Opposition geschleust wurden. Der Kongress der USA
>bewilligte in aller Öffentlichkeit 77 Millionen Dollar für offene
>Einmischung. Am 25. September verabschiedete das Repräsentantenhaus ein
>Gesetz zum Einsatz von weiteren 105 Millionen Dollar zur Unterstützung
>von Anti-Milosevic-Kräften in Serbien und Montenegro.
>
>Diese Artikel schildern die Übergabe von Koffern mit Bargeld an der
>Grenze, endlose Lieferungen von Komputern, Faxgeräten, Mobiltelefonen
>und Instrukteuren für ihren Einsatz. Diese Güter sind durch
>Frontorganisationen, Nichtregierungsorganisationen und Medienkanäle an
>die Opposition übergeben worden.
>
>Wochen vor der Wahl verkündeten vom Westen finanzierte Umfrageinstitute,
>daß Kostunica einen haushohen Wahlsieg erringen würde. Für das westliche
>Medienmonopol, das nach Jugoslawien ausstrahlte, gab es nur zwei
>Optionen. Entweder würde Milosevic gewinnen oder es würde zu massiven
>Wahlfälschungen kommen.
>
>Das US-Außenministerium kündigte an, daß Washington sich selbst dann,
>wenn Milosevic mit großem Abstand gewinnen würde, eine Anerkennung der
>Wahl verweigern würde.
>
>
>Wie sollten die sozialen Bewegungen diese Ereignisse bewerten?
>
>Für jene, die 1999 gegen die NATO-Bombardierungen demonstrierten, sowie
>für alle Aktivisten, die den Kampf gegen den Internationalen
>Währungsfonds, die Weltbank, die Globalisierung und die Schwitzbuden
>aufgenommen haben, stehen bei dem, was demnächst in Jugoslawien
>geschieht, auch ihre eigenen Interessen auf dem Spiel.
>
>Sind sie bereit, in Solidarität zu Jugoslawien zu stehen, welche
>Schritte auch immer notwendig sind, um ein weiteres Land davor zu
>bewahren, unter den Stiefel von IWF und Weltbank gezwungen zu werden?
>
>Washington, London, Paris und Berlin haben sich öffentlich eingemischt
>und sich dessen noch gerühmt. Angesichts dieser Eingeständnisse haben
>jene, die in Jugoslawien in staatlicher Verantwortung stehen, alles
>Recht die Wahlen für ungültig zu erklären und die Opposition zu
>disqualifizieren.
>
>Wäre in den Vereinigten Staaten, Frankreich, Großbritannien und
>Deutschland die Fortsetzung derartiger Wahlen zugelassen worden? In den
>Vereinigten Staaten darf keine politische Organisation Zuwendungen einer
>fremden Regierung für politische Zwecke annehmen, es sei denn, sie ist
>als Agentur einer ausländischen Macht amtlich registriert. Entschlossen
>wacht die herrschende Klasse der USA darüber, daß nur sie den
>Wahlproszess kontrolliert.
>
>Jeder US-Politiker, der ertappt wird, Spenden, Bestechungsgelder oder
>Zahlungen jeglicher Art von einer ausländischen Regierung angenommen zu
>haben, fällt in Ungnade, wird angegriffen und kann strafrechtlich
>belangt werden.
>
>Schon die vage Behauptung, die Clinton-Regierung habe von einem
>Geschäftsmann chinesischer Abstammung, der Kontakte mit China gehabt
>haben könnte, ein Spende angenommen, ließ jeden Politiker in Deckung
>gehen.
>
>
>Korruption und Verrat
>
>Wichtig ist anzuerkennen, daß die jugoslawische Regierung das moralische
>Recht hat, diese Wahl aufgrund der unverschämten ausländischen
>Einmischung für ungültig zu erklären. Sie hat jedes Recht, es
>abzulehnen, mit weiteren Wahlen unter den Bedingungen von Krieg,
>Sanktionen und Besatzung fortzufahren.
>
>Das Parlament hat jedes Recht, eine strafrechtliche Untersuchung der
>Finanzquellen der Opposition einzuleiten. Staatsanwälte haben jedes
>Recht, die Politiker und Publikationen, welche den Wahlprozess
>korrumpiert haben, anzuklagen und einzusperren.
>
>Die Massen haben jedes Recht auf die Straße zu gehen und die Parteien
>und Publikationen der Opposition als Agenten einer ausländischen Macht
>zu verurteilen.
>
>Kostunica, bisher ein kleiner als serbischer Nationalist geltender
>Politiker mit einer langen antikommunistischen Vergangenheit, erklärt
>beharrlich, nie Geld vom Westen angenommen zu haben. Er hat sogar die
>NATO-Bombardierungen und die Sanktionen kritisiert. Kein jugoslawischer
>Politiker könnte einen bedeutenden Stimmenanteil erreichen, wenn er als
>NATO-Marionette angesehen würde.
>
>Es mag stimmen, daß er persönlich kein Geld eingesteckt hat. Aber
>Kostunica hat sich mit politischen Parteien und Organisationen umgeben,
>die Speichellecker der NATO-Länder sind. Seine ganze Kampagne ist von
>Radiostationen, Fernsehstationen und Zeitungen propagiert worden, die
>gänzlich und öffentlich durch Zuwendungen aus Washington und Berlin
>finanziert werden.
>
>Er wird von den imperialistischen Mächten der USA und der EU
>unterstützt, weil sein politisches Programm, selbst wenn es die NATO
>kritisiert, sich gerade die Politiken zu eigen macht, die von der NATO
>gefordert werden. Er ist unter den Politiker derjenige, der am
>leichtesten in einen Strohmann zu verwandeln ist, weil er keine
>persönliche Machtbasis hat. Er ist der Kandidat eines Blocks von 18
>kleinen, zerstrittenen politischen Parteien, die keine gemeinsamen
>Interessen oder ideologischen Orientierungen haben. Vereint sind sie nur
>durch die Gegnerschaft zur Regierung und die Bereitschaft ausländische
>Finanzmittel anzunehmen.
>
>
>US-gesteuerte Staatsstreiche und Konterrevolutionen
>
>Die großen US-Monopole und -Banken sowie Washington haben nie Wahlen als
>"frei und fair" akzeptiert, wenn diese ihre Klasseninteressen
>gefährdeten oder den Massen Einfluß einräumten. Seit Ende des zweiten
>Weltkrieges hat die Regierung der USA den Sturz von mehr als 50
>Regierungen bewerkstelligt.
>
>In Chile organisierte die CIA 1973 einen Militärputsch, um die
>fortschrittliche legal gewählte Regierung in Blut zu ertränken. Gleiches
>tat sie 1953 im Iran und 1954 in Guatemala.
>
>Im Jahre 1990 orchestrierten die USA den Sturz der Sandinisten in
>Nicaragua. Washington hatte ein Koalition aus 20 Parteien zusammen
>geschustert, deren einziges Ziel es war, die Regierung zu stürzen und
>die alten besitzenden Klassen wieder zu installieren. Washington
>versprach, den "Contra"-Krieg und die Sanktionen zu beenden und massive
>Hilfe zur Verfügung zu stellen, falls die populären Sandinisten
>geschlagen würden.
>
>In dieser Lage, die der heutigen in Jugoslawien sehr ähnlich ist, gelang
>es Washington, die Wahlen zu manipulieren, um die Sandinisten zu
>vertreiben. Aber die USA kamen nie mit der Hilfe über, und heute sind
>einige der am niedrigsten bezahlten Schwitzbuden der Welt in der
>"Freihandelszone" von Nicaragua in Betrieb.
>
>
>"Freie Wahlen" in einem Land im Belagerungszustand?
>
>Jugoslawien verdeutlicht wie Nicaragua die Gefahren einer Wahl bei
>Andauern eines unerbittlichen Krieges, unmenschlicher Sanktionen und der
>Besetzung eines Teils des Landes durch fremde Armeen. Mit der Herrschaft
>über die Weltmedien, dem Köder materieller Vorteile, Bestechungen und
>der Androhung künftiger Bestrafung waren diese Mächte in der Lage,
>mitten in das Land einzugreifen.
>
>Präsident Milosevic unternahm den Versuch, durch Ansetzung von Wahlen
>ein Mandat zu erhalten, als die Opposition gespalten, schwach und
>diskreditiert erschien. Aber umgehend machten die Imperialisten sie
>stark, indem sie Taktiken benutzen, die in Jahrzehnten der
>Interventionen verfeinert worden waren.
>
>Jugoslawien, ein kleines belagertes Land, das um sein Überleben kämpft,
>hat Dutzenden von offen pro-imperialistischen Parteien erlaubt, Büros
>und Mitarbeiterstäbe zu unterhalten, Zeitungen herauszugeben und an
>Wahlen teilzunehmen. Diese Konzessionen haben die Feinde der
>jugoslawischen Arbeiter nur weiter ermutigt.
>
>Obgleich die Imperialisten sich beschwerten, daß ihnen nicht gestattet
>wurde, die Wahlen zu überwachen, kamen hunderte von Ausländern als
>Wahlbeobachter ins Land und bestätigten, daß sie "frei und fair" waren,
>daß die Regierung sich ehrlich und rechtskonform an alle
>Wahlvorschriften gehalten hat. Aber dies lenkte die Aufmerksamkeit von
>dem wirklichen Betrug ab, der tatsächlich stattfand, von der massiven
>Intervention und Einschüchterung durch den Imperialismus.
>
>Die politische Opposition erhielt die Erlaubnis für eine praktisch
>uneingeschränkte Annahme ausländischer Hilfe, Beratung und
>Medienwerbung. Der ganze Prozess wurde durch eine Armee von westlichen
>Beratern und Meinungsbefragern korrumpiert.
>
>
>Werden die Kräfte der USA und der NATO Erfolg haben?
>
>Berichte von Wahlbeobachtern und selbst von Konzernmedien zeigen, daß es
>einen harten Kern von Unterstützung aus der Arbeiterklasse für Milosevic
>von Seiten jener gibt, die in ihm den Verteidiger des Landes gegen die
>NATO sehen. Selbst unter solchen, die aus Ärger über Milosevic naiv für
>Kostunica gestimmt haben, sind viele, die sich dem westlichen
>Imperialismus widersetzen möchten.
>
>Die Frage, vor der die jugoslawischen Massen nun stehen, ist: Werden die
>westlichen transnationalen Unternehmen auf Grund dieser durch
>Intervention verfälschten Wahl in der Lage sein, den Staatsapparat zu
>erobern und die Tür zu einer Superausbeutung öffnen?
>
>Wenn die linken Organisationen und patriotischen Parteien in Jugoslawien
>Widerstand leisten, werden sie dann von den fortschrittlichen, Arbeiter-
>und Antikriegsbewegungen im Westen gegen den unausbleiblichen
>Propagandablitzkrieg aus dem Westen und einen möglichen neuen
>Militärschlag verteidigt werden?
>
>
>Was kann getan werden?
>
>Ein Beitrag zu dieser Anstrengung könnte in einer
>Untersuchungskommission bestehen, um die korrumpierende Rolle zu
>erforschen, welche die US-Regierung, die Europäische Union, und die NATO
>als ihr militärischer Arm, sowie ihre Internationalen
>Finanzorganisationen bei den jugoslawischen Wahlen gespielt haben.
>
>Diese Untersuchung könnte im Bezug auf die Bemühungen dieser
>Institutionen, die jugoslawische Regierung zu untergraben und zu
>stürzen, Informationen zusammentragen und öffentlich machen. Sie könnte
>auch Informationen über die offene und heimliche Finanzierung von
>politischen Parteien, Organisationen und Publikationen durch
>US-Regierungsagenturen sammeln.
>
>Die Untersuchung könnte das Problem Jugoslawiens dadurch international
>verständlicher machen, daß sie auch Zeugenaussagen und Berichte über
>US-Interventionen in innere Angelegenheiten anderer Regierungen mit
>umfaßt. Einbezogen würden somit der Sturz anderer populärer Regierungen
>in Guatemala, Panama, Chile, Iran und Indonesien sowie auch die
>Einmischung in Wahlen in Italien, Haiti, Nicaragua, Guyana und andere
>Länder.
>
>Aktivisten in anderen NATO-Ländern könnten ihre eigene
>Untersuchungskommission und öffentliche Hearings organisieren, um zu
>untersuchen, in wie weit diese jüngste Intervention ihre eigenen Gesetze
>verletzt. Ähnliche Informationen kamen bereits zuvor dadurch ans Licht,
>daß Hearings und Tribunale in vielen Ländern die Führer der USA und der
>NATO wegen Kriegsverbrechen gegen Jugoslawien anklagten.
>
>Die Bedeutung internationaler Solidarität sollte nie unterschätzt
>werden. Jugoslawien darf nicht allein gelassen werden.
>Übersetzung aus dem Amerikanischen: Klaus von Raussendorff
>
>***************************************************************************
******
>
>DEN VON KOSTUNICA UND DEM WESTEN ANGEZETTELTEN
>BÜRGERKRIEG VERHINDERN
>Erklärung des Exekutivkomitees der Internationalen Leninistischen
>Strömung
>Wien, 27. September 2000
>Quelle: Email-Mitteilung vom 28. September 2000
>
>
>Die Wahlen in Jugoslawien waren vor allem durch die massive Einmischung
>desWestens gekennzeichnet. Die Opposition wurde nicht nur mit
>ungeheurenGeldbeträgen unterstützt, man versprach die Aufhebung
>dermenschenverachteten Sanktionen für den Fall, dass der westliche
>Kandidatgewönne, die gleichgeschaltete internationalen Medienmaschine
>zogen abermalsin den Krieg gegen Milosevic, sondern man stieß abermals
>militärischeDrohungen mit Manövern in Kroatien, Rumänien und Bulgarien
>sowie durchKanonenboote in der Adria aus – ganz zu schweigen von der
>politischen,wirtschaftlichen und militärischen Aggression des
>vergangenen Jahrzehnts mitdem Ziel den Widerstand des jugoslawischen und
>serbischen Volkes zuzerstören. Unter diesen Bedingungen konnte keine
>Wahl frei, fair unddemokratische Wahl sein.
>
>Wir sind nicht in der Lage die Richtigkeit des Wahlergebnisses
>zuverifizieren, aber was wir sicher wissen ist, dass der Imperialismus
>auf derganzen Welt Wahlen manipuliert und fälsch was das Zeug hält um
>seineMarionetten an der Macht zu halten. Mit ihrer Medienmaschine ist es
>ihnenkein Problem selbst die schlimmsten Diktaturen wie jene Fujimoris
>in Peruweißzuwaschen. Es gibt daher keinerlei Anlass ihrem Geschrei
>vonWahlfälschung glauben zu schenken zumal Wahlbeobachter aus der ganzen
>Welt(ausgenommen die Nato-Aggressor-Staaten) berichteten, dass es zu
>keinengröberen Unregelmäßigkeiten gekommen wäre.
>
>Allein die Tatsache, dass Kostunica und die bürgerliche Opposition
>nichtbereit ist an den Stichwahlen teilzunehmen, zeigt deren Angst sie
>zuverlieren. Mit der Unterstützung ihrer westlichen Herrn haben sie
>esvorgezogen zum Angriff überzugehen, indem sie die Wahlen boykottieren,
>zuMassenprotesten auf der Straße und selbst zum Generalstreik aufrufen
>umMilosevic zu stürzen. Sie versuchen damit das erschöpfte Volk in
>einenblutigen und brudermörderischen Bürgerkrieg zu stürzen, der das
>Land undseine Fähigkeit gegen die Neue Weltordnung Widerstand zu leisten
>nur weiterschwächt würde und daher einzig und allein im Interesse des
>Imperialismusund seiner lokalen Agenten ist.
>
>Das zeigt die Komplizenschaft Kostunicas mit dem Imperialismus und der
>Nato,die dieser bisher geschickt hinter einer nationalistischen Maste
>zuverstecken verstand. Er behauptete, er wäre gegen die Nato-Krieg und
>für dieWiedereingliederung des Kosovos. Tatsächlich ist der
>Oppositionsblock ausden offensten und schlimmsten Hampelmännern der Nato
>wie beispielsweiseDjindjic zusammengesetzt. Der wirkliche Charakter
>Kostunicas kommt nicht nurdurch die gigantischen Geldflüsse ans
>Tageslicht, sondern auch durch seineUnterstützung für die Vorschläge der
>sogenannten G17, die nichts anderessind als eine Kopie der Programme des
>IWF, der WTO und der Weltbank, die diehalbkoloniale Aussaugung des
>Landes nach dem Vorbild Bulgariens oderRusslands zum Ziel haben. Doch
>selbst wenn sich Serbien ergeben und demDiktat der Neuen Weltordnung
>unterordnen sollte, so wie es Kostunica vorhat, wird dies den von den
>Auswirkungen der westlichen Aggressionzerrütteten jugoslawischen Massen
>keine Hilfe und Verbesserung ihrer Lagebringen. Denn das Ziel des
>Imperialismus ist die Zerstörung Jugoslawiens undSerbiens als dem
>strategischen Haupthindernis für die Durchdringung undHerrschaft über
>den Balkan.
>
>Dass Milosevic das Land in eine Krise geführt hat, ist allerdings
>wahr.Ausdruck dessen sind sowohl die Vereinbarungen von Dayton (die in
>dervergeblichen Hoffnung eine Konfrontation vermeiden zu können große
>TeileBosniens dem Imperialismus überließen), die Korruption in der
>führendenSchicht, ihre Bereicherung durch Privatisierungen und nicht
>zuletzt dieheutige gefährliche Konfrontation: die Verfassungsänderung in
>Richtung einerPräsidialrepublik war ein schwerer Fehler und konnte nicht
>anders als einenZusammenstoss bewirken, der durch einen vom Parlament
>gewählten Präsidentenhätte verhindert werden können. Nichtsdestotrotz
>war es der an der Machtbefindliche soziale Block der Jugoslawien als
>einen von derimperialistischen Neuen Weltordnung unabhängigen Staat
>verteidigte undwichtige soziale Errungenschaften der Bauern, Arbeiter
>und der Volksmassenim allgemeinen sowie den multinationalen Charakter
>der Gesellschaftbewahrte.
>
>Der Zusammenstoss zwischen der bürgerlichen Opposition und
>demRegierungsblock der SPS ist daher gleichzeitig sowohl eine
>Konfrontationzwischen dem Imperialismus und einem um die Bewahrung
>seiner Freiheitkämpfenden Volk als auch ein Klassenkonflikt. Es handelt
>sich um dieFortsetzung der bereits seit zehn Jahren andauernden
>imperialistischenAggression, die jedoch ihr Ziel, die vollständige
>Unterordnung undZerstörung Jugoslawiens und Serbiens selbst mit dem
>Nato-Krieg desvergangenen Jahres nach wie vor nicht erreichen konnte.
>Der Umstand, dassMilosevic den Kampf der jugoslawischen und serbischen
>Massen in eineSackgasse geführt hat, ändern nichts am fortschrittlichen
>undantiimperialistischen Charakter des von ihm geführten Blocks der
>einfachenVolksmassen.
>
>Die antiimperialistischen, revolutionären und kommunistischen Kräfte
>inJugoslawien und auf der ganzen Welt müssen jene unterstützen die:
>
>· den Bürgerkrieg zu verhindern trachten, der von Kostunica, der
>Oppositionund dem Westen angezettelt wird,
>· die die Unabhängigkeit und den Widerstand Jugoslawiens und Serbiens
>gegendie Nato und ihre Neue Weltordnung tragen und für die
>vollständigeDurchführung der UN-Resolution 1244 und die spätere
>Wiedereingliederung desKosovos nach Jugoslawien eintreten,
>· für soziale Gerechtigkeit und Gleichheit stehen und die
>neoliberalenRezepte des IWF, der WTO und der Weltbank ablehnen
>· den multinationalen Charakter Jugoslawiens sichern.
>
>Gleichzeitig muss auf dieser Basis eine unabhängige Bewegung der
>Volksmassen
>aufgebaut werden.
>
>Exekutivkomitee der Internationalen Leninistischen Strömung
>Wien, 27. September 2000
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>Kontakt:
>Revolutionär Kommunistische Liga (RKL)
>(österr. Sektion der Internationalen Leninistischen Strömung - ILS)
>PF 23, A-1040 Wien, Österreich
>Tel & Fax +43 1 504 00 10
>rkl@...
>members.magnet.at/rkl
>www.antiimperialista.com
>Konto PSK 92 125 137 BLZ 60000
>
>
>
>***************************************************************************
*
>
>Anlage 3
>
>AUSVERKAUF VERHANDELT
>BELGRADER OPPOSITIONSFÜHRER TRAFEN SICH MIT IWF-VERTRETERN IN BULGARIEN
>Von Michel Chossudovsky und Jared Israel
>Aus: junge Welt v. 04.10.2000
>Quelle des Originalartikels:
>http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/11.htm)
>
>Die jugoslawische Bevölkerung dürfte sich kaum bewußt sein, daß zwei
>prominente Mitglieder derDemokratischen Opposition Serbiens (DOS) soeben
>eine sehr wichtige Reise nach Bulgarien unternommenhaben. Dort trafen
>sie Vertreter des Internationalen Währungsfonds (IWF), der Weltbank und
>derNATO-Regierungen bei einer sogenannten »Geberkonferenz«. Der Zweck
>der Reise bestand darin,Vorkehrungen für die Übernahme Jugoslawiens
>durch die NATO-Regierungen zu treffen.
>
>Die Reise wurde am Tag nach den jugoslawischen Wahlen angekündigt.
>Mladjan Dinkic, derhöchstwahrscheinliche Finanzminister in einer
>Regierung der Opposition, »sagte, daß sich Vertreter seinerG-17-Plus in
>dieser Woche zu einer Geberkonferenz über Jugoslawien mit Vertretern des
>InternationalenWährungsfonds nach Bulgarien begeben würden« (UPI vom
>27.9.00).
>
>Dinkic wurde von Dr. Dragoslav Avramovic, einem Wirtschaftsfachman der
>»Allianz für den Wandel« vonZoran Djindjic begleitet. An diese Gruppen
>der sogenannten demokratischen Opposition sind von Agenturender US-
>Regierung Riesensummen gezahlt worden.
>
>Dinkic erklärte gegenüber United Press International, daß »Dragoslav
>Avramovic eine Absichtserklärung(Letter of Intent) mit einem Antrag an
>den IWF und die Weltbank verfaßt habe. Dinkic sagte, er erwarte,
>daßdaraufhin Verhandlungen mit Geberländern, dem sogenannten Pariser
>Club folgen würden...« Das sind dieNATO-Länder. Ein »Letter of Intent«
>schließt ein »Memorandum über wirtschaftliche und finanziellePolitiken«
>ein. Darin werden die Bedingungen festgelegt, unter denen ganz
>Jugoslawien der Kontrollewestlicher Geber und Gläubiger unterstellt
>würde. Nur ein vom Parlament bestätigter jugoslawischerFinanzminister
>hat das Recht, einen »Letter of Intent« zu formulieren. Dinkic und
>Avramovic hingegen vertretennur die »demokratische« Opposition. In
>welchem Lande ist es Elementen der Opposition legalerweise gestattet,mit
>Feindstaaten, die ihre Bewegung finanzieren, zu »verhandeln«? Das ist
>ein Extremfall von Einmischungdurch die NATO- Länder.
>
>Welche Maßnahmen möchten die NATO-Länder durchsetzen?
>
>- Abbau aller Preiskontrollen durch die Regierung
>
>- Einführung »freier Märkte« ohne Schutz für Landwirte oder Unternehmen
>vor Überschwemmung durchausländische Güter
>
>- Abbau des ganzen Sozialsystems. Keine staatliche Hilfe durch
>Gesundheitsfürsorge, öffentlicheVerkehrsmittel, Lebensmittel und Heizung
>
>- Sperre für Kredite an Unternehmen
>
>- Massive Entlassungen von Arbeitern und drastische
>Einkommensminderungen für Arbeiter und Bauern
>
>- Zwangsliquidierung von wichtigen Unternehmen und Industriezweigen des
>öffentlichen und privaten Sektors
>
>- Übertragung jeglicher weiteren Wiederaufbauarbeiten zur Beseitigung
>der Bombenschäden an Unternehmenaus NATO-Ländern.
>
>Das Ergebnis dieser Politik wäre: Die Nahrungsmittelpreise würden in die
>Höhe schnellen, Unternehmenwürden in den Bankrott und in die Liquidation
>getrieben werden, ausländisches Kapital würde die ganzeWirtschaft an
>sich raffen.
>
>Der »Letter of Intent« würde die Annahme der politischen Bedingungen
>Washingtons erzwingen. Diese sindsoeben in dem sogenannten Serbian
>Democratization Act HR 1064 dargelegt worden. Es wurde
>vomUS-Repräsentantenhaus am 25. September angenommen, an dem Tag, an dem
>Dinkic seine Reise nachBulgarien ankündigte. Gutes Timing. Nach den
>Bestimmungen dieses Gesetzes muß Jugoslawien, um von denSanktionen
>befreit und zum IWF »zugelassen« zu werden,
>
>1) Verhandlungen über die Unabhängigkeit (sprich Abtrennung) des Kosovo
>und wahrscheinlich auch derVojvodina aufnehmen;
>
>2) das Land vollständig »demokratisieren«. »Demokratisierung« ist eine
>Codewort für die Durchführung allerAnweisungen der US-Regierung;
>
>3) »alle Fragen mit den anderen Republiken« regeln. Dies würde die 50
>Milliarden US-Dollar einschließen,welche die kroatische Regierung und
>die Izetbegovic-Regierung in Bosnien als Kriegsreparationen
>verlangen.Das Geld ginge unversehens an die Gläubiger dieser Länder, und
>zwar an die NATO-Regierungen und an diewestlichen Banken;
>
>4) vollständige Zusammenarbeit »mit dem Internationalen Straftribunal
>für das frühere Jugoslawien,einschließlich der Überstellung aller von
>dem Tribunal angeklagten Personen an Den Haag«. Das bedeutet, daßdie
>jugoslawische Armee auf jede Person Jagd machen müßte, von der das
>Haager Tribunal behauptet, eshandele sich um einen Kriegsverbrecher.
>Jeder Führer des Widerstands könnte auf die Haager Geheimlistefingierter
>Kriegsverbrecher gesetzt werden.
>
>All dies macht vollkommen klar, daß Herrn Kostunicas Versprechen, mit
>dem Internationalen Währungsfondszusammenzuarbeiten aber gleichzeitig
>»Jugoslawien zu bewahren«, leere Worte sind. Sie klingen gut,
>bedeutenaber nichts. Mit der Zustimmung zur Abfassung eines »Letter of
>Intent« hat Kostunicas Koalition an dernationalen Souveränität bereits
>Fahnenflucht begangen. Sie hat Jugoslawien, seine Wirtschaft,
>seineInstitutionen und seine Bevölkerung verkauft.
>
>Inzwischen ermächtigt das US-Gesetz HR 1064 die US- Regierung, der
>sogenannten demokratischen Oppositionund der sezessionistischen
>Regierung in Montenegro sofort weitere 105 Millionen US-Dollar zukommen
>zulassen. Amerikanisches Geld - zusammen mit Mitteln aus anderen Quellen
>- wird nicht nur Wahlkampfkostendecken, sondern auch Gehälter
>finanzieren.
>
>Washington und die NATO bezahlen Schlüsselfiguren der Opposition ganz
>offen dafür, daß sie tun, was manihnen sagt. Sie stehen auf der
>Gehaltsliste der NATO-Bombenwerfer.
>
>(Übersetzung aus dem Amerikanischen: Klaus von Raussendorff)
>
>
>***************************************************************************
*
>
>Anlage 4
>Erklärung der Wahlbeobachter aus Deutschland:
>DEMOKRATISCHE UND FAIRE BEDINGUNGEN IM LAND SELBST,
>MASSIVE MANIPULATIONS- UND ERPRESSUNGSVERSUCHE VON AUSSEN -
>Fazit der deutschen Beobachter der Wahlen am 24. September 2000 in
>Jugoslawien
>
>Entgegen der von Medien und Politikern im Westen verbreiteten
>Informationen, dass die jugoslawischen Wahlen unter Ausschluss
>unabhängiger internationaler Beobachter stattgefunden hätten, haben
>tatsächlich 210 Wahlbeobachter aus 54 Ländern, unter ihnen 52
>Abgeordnete, den Wahlverlauf verfolgt.
>Als Wahlbeobachter aus Deutschland, eingeladen vom Jugoslawischen
>Bundesparlament, sind wir überrascht, dass unsere Arbeit in der
>deutschen Öffentlichkeit nicht wahrgemommen wird, und erst recht diese
>Chance zur Information aus erster Hand nicht genutzt wird.
>Wir hoffen sehr, dass dies nicht seine Ursache darin hat, dass manche
>interessierten Seiten schon vor Öffnung der Wahllokale am 24. September
>2000 „wissen" wollten, dass die Wahlen gefälscht würden, und
>„Ergebnisse" der Wahlen bereits verkündeten, bevor die Stimmen
>ausgezählt waren.
>Wir hatten als Wahlbeobachter jede Möglichkeit, uns frei zu bewegen,
>Überprüfungen vor Ort vorzunehmen, die Bedingungen und den Ablauf der
>Wahlen in allen Phasen zu kontrollieren. Mehrere hundert Wahllokale
>wurden von den Beobachtern unangemeldet besucht. Daher stellen wir fest,
>dass unsere Beobachtungen mit unseren eigenen Augen und mit eigenem
>kritischen Verstand vorgenommen wurden, und dass wir daher den Wert
>unserer Beobachtungen und Festellungen anders einschätzen als jene
>diversen Stellungnahmen von Politikern, die mit Informationen aus
>dritter Hand in der Regel ihre vorgefasste Meinung bestätigt sehen
>wollen.
> Die Internationale Beobachterkommission der Wahlen am 24. September
>2000 hat in einer gemeinsamen Erklärung festgestellt, dass die Wahlen
>demokratisch und fair verlaufen sind, und die Standards von
>demokratischen Wahlen in anderen Ländern voll erfüllt haben. Dieser
>Feststellung wie der Gesamtstellungnahme der Internationalen Kommission
>schliesst sich die deutsche Beobachtergruppe voll inhaltlich an. Sie
>unterstreicht dabei besonders die Kritik hinsichtlich des skandalösen,
>umfassenden Drucks (bis zur Existenzbedrohung), mit denen die Wähler in
>Montenegro durch die Djukanovic-Regierung von der Ausübung ihres
>Wahlrechts abgehalten werden sollten. Dies ist mit dem Grundsatz fairer
>und freier, demokratischer und rechtsstaatlich einwandfreier Wahlen
>nicht in Einklang zu bringen.
>Wir unterstützen ebenso und aus den gleichen Gründen die Kritik an der
>massiven ausländischen Einmischung in den Wahlkampf, sei es in Form
>einer 77-Millionen-US-Dollarspende an bestimmte kandidierende
>Gruppierungen, sei es durch „Wahlversprechen" der EU, man werde bei ein
>bestimmtes Wählervotum durch Aufhebung von Sanktionen honorieren. Von
>jedem freien, zivilisierten und demokratischen Land würden derartige
>Versuche der politischen Einmischung und Erpressung energisch
>zurückgewiesen, und wir befürchten, dass solche Parteinahme vor den
>Wahlen die Bereitschaft beeinträchtigen könnte, den Ablauf und die
>Ergebnisse der Wahlen unvoreingenommen und objektiv zur Kenntnis zu
>nehmen und das Recht zur selbständigen Entscheidung der Bevölkerung
>über die eigene Zukunft zu akzeptieren.
>Die Internationale Beobachterkommission insgesamt hat sich ebenso wie
>wir deutschen Beobachter jede Mühe gemacht, mögliche Fehler,
>Unkorrektheiten oder Fälschungsbemühungen zu identifizieren. Wir konnten
>keine diesbezüglichen Feststellungen treffen. In Einzelfällen war der
>Sichtschutz zur Sicherstellung der geheimen Stimmabgabe mangelhaft, was
>dann sofort nach unserer Intervention korrigiert wurde. In
>Einzelfällen waren Wahlwillige nicht in den Wählerlisten verzeichnet,
>entsprechend den Problemen in Deutschland, wenn Wahlberechtigte ihre
>Eintragung in der Wählerliste nicht vorher prüfen. Gehäuft traten solche
>Probleme der fehlenden Verzeichnung in den Wählerlisten bei jenen auf,
>die seit Übernahme der Verwaltung durch UNMIK/KFOR aus Kosovo und
>Metohija gewaltsam vertrieben wurden. Hier gabe es offenkundig
>Abstimmungsprobleme mit den Listen des Roten Kreuzes, in denen offenbar
>nicht alle Vertriebenen erfasst sind.
> Grundsätzlich ist aber festzuhalten, dass - von diesen Einwänden
>abgesehen – die Wahlen in Übereinstimmung mit den gesetzlichen
>Vorschriften stattfanden, diese Vorschriften internationalen
>rechtsstaatlichen Masstäben entsprechen, und die Durchführung der Wahlen
>korrekt und professionell erfolgte. Wir konnten uns davon überzeugen,
>dass es in Jugoslawien gelungen ist, trotz widriger Umstände - durch
>acht Jahre Wirtschaftssanktionen und den völkerrechtswidrigen
>Angriffskrieg der NATO 1999 – die allgemeinen Bedingungen für
>demokratische Wahlen zu schaffen, ebenso für die Tätigkeit und das
>Zusammenwirken unterschiedlicher politischer Kräfte. Die Rechtmässigkeit
>und Legitimität der Wahlen steht somit ausser Frage.
> Zum Wahlablauf konnten wir konkret feststellen:
>1. Die Wahlurnen in den Wahllokalen wurden bei Öffnung der Wahllokale
>versiegelt, nachdem durch den ersten Wähler festgestellt und mit
>Unterschrift bestätigt wurde, dass sie leer waren. Die Stimmzettel
>wurden in abgezählter Stückzahl in versiegelten Paketen unmittelbar vor
>der Wahl ausgeliefert, ihr Empfang war zu quittieren, die nicht
>verbrauchten Stimmzettel mussten nach Abschluss der Stimmabgabe gezählt,
>die Zahl quittiert und als versiegeltes Paket zurückgegeben werden.
>2. In allen Wahlkomitees waren Vertreter der an der Wahl teilnehmenden
>Parteien / Gruppierungen, einschliesslich der Oppositionsparteien,
>beteiligt. Die Auszählung der Stimmen erfolgte gemeinsam. Über die
>Gültigkeit zweifelhafter Stimmzettel wurde abgestimmt. Das Protokoll mit
>dem Wahlergebnis wurde von allen Mitgliedern unterzeichnet.
>3. Von diesem Protokoll wurden sechs Exemplare angefertigt. Das erste
>Exemplar ging mit allen Wahlunterlagen an das Wahlkomitee des jeweiligen
>Wahlkreises. Das zweite wurde an der Eingangstür des Wahllokals
>ausgehängt. Die vier verbleibenden Exemplare wurden unmittelbar an die
>Vertreter der vier Parteien / Gruppierungen ausgehändigt, deren
>Kandidaten die meisten Stimmen auf sich vereinigen konnten. Alle
>übrigen Parteien / Gruppierungen hatten Anspruch auf Aushändigung einer
>Protokoll-Kopie innerhalb von 12 Stunden.
>4. Eine nochmalige Stimmzählung auf örtlicher oder Wahlkreisebene findet
>nicht statt. Es gilt ausschliesslich das original im Wahllokal
>festgestellte und von allen unterzeichnete Ergebnis, eine nachträgliche
>Veränderung dieser ursprünglichen Zahlen ist somit ausgeschlossen.
>5. Die Wahlergebnisse auf Bundeseben werden auf Basis sämtlicher
>Prokolle aus den Wahllokalen von der Bundeswahlkommission in den Rechner
>eingegeben. Die eingegeben Zahlen können eingesehen und von den
>Parteivertretern, die auch einen Platz in der Bundeswahlkommission
>haben, mit den Zahlen der in ihrer Hand befindlichen Einzelprotokollen
>verglichen werden.
>6. Vorsorglich hat die deutsche Beobachtergruppe stichprobenartig
>Ergebnisse aus Wahllokalen notiert und mit den Eingaben im zentralen
>Rechner der Bundeswahlkommission verglichen – mit dem Ergebnis, dass die
>Eingaben korrekt erfolgt sind.
>Aufgrund dieses festgestellten Verfahrens sind die in westlichen Medien
>behaupteten „gestohlenen Stimmen" oder Wahlfälschungen technisch
>praktisch nicht durchführbar. Dies hat der Wahlkampfmanager der DOS,
>Zoran Djindjic, auf Befragen ausdrücklich bestätigt.
>Wiederholt wurde nach der Wahl von verschiedenen Seiten das „lange
>Schweigen" der Wahlkommission kritisiert, während die verschiedenen
>Parteien sich ständig mit neuen Siegesmeldungen zu übertreffen
>versuchten, wobei sie sich jeweils nur auf jenen Teil der von ihnen
>selektiv ausgewählten Wahlprotokolle stützten.
>Das Zusammenführen der einzelnen Wahlergebnisse in der Rechenzentrale
>der Bundeswahlkommission als Grundlage offizieller Ergebnisse erklärt,
>für die Wahlbeobachter nachvollziehbar, den beanspruchten Zeitbedarf.
>Die Wahlkommission ist gesetzlich verpflichtet, das amtliche Endergebnis
>binnen 72 Stunden nach Schliessung der Wahllokale bekanntzugeben. Eine
>ständige Bekanntgabe nicht repräsentativer Zwischenergebnisse würde nur
>der Tendenz zur subjektiven Interpretation im Sinne vorweggenommener
>Endergebnisse Vorschub leisten. Die an die Fristen zur Bekanntgabe des
>Wahlergebnisses geknüpften Spekulationen und Unterstellungen einer
>Fälschungsmöglichkeit sind unhaltbar.
>Die Wahlbeobachter kritisieren, dass bestimmte Politiker der EU und der
>USA ihre Missachtung der demokratischen Willensbildung der Bevölkerung
>dadurch ausgedrückt haben, Wahlsieger zu ernennen, ohne Wahlverfahren
>und die tatsächlichen Wahlergebnisse zu kennen. Diese Einmischung ist
>umso verwerflicher, als sie mit der Androhung von Sanktionen verbunden
>isrt..
>Die Wahlbeobachter geben ihrer Überzeugung Ausdruck, dass Frieden,
>Stabilität und Partnerschaft zwischen allen Staaten nur auf der
>Grundlage der Respektierung gleicher Rechte, der Souveränität und
>Gleichheit gedeihen können.
>
>Belgrad, 26. September 2000 - Für die deutsche Beobachtergruppe:
>
>gez.
>Klaus Hartmann, Präsident der Weltunion der Freidenker;
>Ralph Hartmann; Botschafter a.D.;
>Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Richter, Vors. d. Ges. zum Schutz der Bürgerrechte
>und Menschenwürde;
>Elmar Schmähling, ehem. Flottillenadmiral.
>
>
>
>E N D E
>
>Gregory Elich, Balkan-Experte in den USA, der vor den Wahlen in
>Jugoslawien gewarnt hatte, daß die Nato ihren zweiten Angriff auf
>Jugoslawien vorbereitet (junge Welt vom 14. und 15.9.2000) gibt in einer
>Email-Mitteilung an Aktivisten der US-Friedensbewegung von Samstag, den
>7. Oktober 2000, folgende Einschätzung der aktuellen Lage:
>
>"Ich stimme voll zu, das dies in den kommenden Tagen der entscheidende
>Kampf sein wird. Die Linke hat eine solide Mehrheit in beiden Häusern
>des Parlaments gewonnen. Das ist eindeutig der Grund, warum Kostunica es
>abgelehnt hat, an der Stichwahl am 8. Oktober teilzunehmen, obgleich er
>sicher war, daß er gewinnen würde. Bei einem Sieg Kostunicas im zweiten
>Wahlgang gäbe es immer noch die linke Mehrheit in beiden Kammern; seine
>Möglichkeit, den sozialen Sektor abzubauen und das Land der NATO zu
>übergeben wären ernsthaft eingeschränkt. Der große Kampf wird sich darum
>drehen, ob die legal gewählten Vertreter ihre Sitze einnehmen können. In
>dieser Hinsicht ist es bezeichnend, daß DOS gestern abend angekündigt
>hat, daß man ein Krisen - Komitee bilden würde, um das Land zu
>"regieren".... Vermutlich bedeutet dies, daß beide Kammern entweder
>aufgelöst oder mit bedeutungslosen, trivialen Aufgaben beschäftigt
>werden, während die wirklichen Staatsgeschäfte durch dieses durch den
>Putsch eingesetzte Komitee geführt werden. Bezeichnend ist auch, daß bis
>letzte Woche Jugoslawien eine außerordentlich reiche und vielfältige
>Medienlandschaft hatte, wo alle Meinungen vertreten waren und mit weiter
>Verbreitung. Unter den Sozialisten waren die meisten Medien in den
>Händen der Rechten (und die meisten dieser Publikationen wurden vom
>Westen finanziert). Als Folge des Putsches dieser Woche ist nun die
>"Medienfreiheit" in Jugoslawien eingeführt , was bedeutet, das es keine
>Vielfalt mehr gibt. Tanjug, Politika, RTS und alle linken Medien sind
>beschlagnahmt und unter Kontrolle der rechten Opposition. Das ist das
>westliche Modell der "Medienfreiheit": man hat viele Wahlmöglichkeiten,
>man kann beliebig aus auswählen unter: rechts, oder rechts oder sogar
>rechts. Die Beschlagnahme der Medien war wichtig, weil nun viele der
>Machenschaften ohne Berichterstattung vor sich gehen können oder nur in
>entstellter Form präsentiert werden. Wir gewannen die erste Schlacht mit
>dem Triumph der Linken in beiden Kammern des Parlaments, aber wir
>verloren die nächsten drei Schlachten: den Putsch, der die Stichwahlen
>vom 8. Oktober beiseite schob, die Beschlagnahme der Medien und die
>Einsetzung eines Krisen - Komitees, um das Land zu regieren. Es bleibt
>abzuwarten, ob das Komitee regieren wird oder ob die Kammern regieren
>werden....und falls die letzteren, ob die legal gewählten Vertreter ihre
>Sitze einnehmen werden oder ob diese Sitze an jene übergeben werden, die
>dem Putsch freundlich gegenüberstehen."
>
>Aus "Emperor's Clothes"
>http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/sinclair/governin.htm
>ist zu entnehmen, "Was die Medien verschweigen."
>
>"(......) Zum ersten Mal haben Milosevics Sozialistische Partei und ihre
>Verbündeten eine absolute Mehrheit der Sitze sowohl im Ober- als auch im
>Unterhaus des Parlaments gewonnen. Die Ergebnisse der
>Präsidentschaftswahlen sind Gegenstand vieler (schlecht-informierter)
>Debatten. Aber niemand bestreitet die Ergebnisse für das Parlament. In
>Jugoslawien hatte die Regierung vor diesen Wahlen nur 64 Sitze von
>insgesamt 138 Sitzen im Unterhaus. Nun haben sie acht Sitze hinzu
>gewonnen und eine Mehrheit von drei Stimmen erreicht: 72 von 138
>Sitzen. Bisher mußte die Regierung eine Koalition mit einer der
>kleineren Parteien schmieden, wenn sie ein Gesetz verabschieden wollte.
>Mit dieser neuen Mehrheit im Unterhaus braucht sich die Regierung nicht
>länger auf eine schwankende Mehrheit zu stützen, um die erforderliche
>Gesetzgebung durchzusetzen. Die Regierung erzielte einen noch größeren
>Sieg im Wahlrennen für den Senat, das Oberhaus. Sie gewann sieben von 20
>Sitzen für Serbien und 19 von 20 für Montenegro. Die Opposition gewann
>gerade eben 10 von 40 Sitzen. Die Regierung verfehlte knapp die
>Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit. Die Regierungspartei von Milosevic erzielte einen
>großen Sieg, indem sie die Mehrheit sowohl im Unterhaus wie im Oberhaus
>gewann. Es ist dieses Ergebnis, das die Westmächte um jeden Preis
>ungeschehen machen wollen, und dabei selbst so weit gehen zu versuchen,
>einen Bürgerkrieg zu entfesseln oder eine Provokation zu inszenieren, um
>eine Invasion Jugoslawiens zu rechtfertigen."
>
>Sara Flounders vom IAC schlägt in ihrem Artikel (Anlage 1) den
>Aktivisten der internationalen Tribunalbewegung vor, eine Internationale
>Untersuchungskommission über die Einmischung des Westens in Jugoslawien
>zu bilden.
>
>Die Internationale Leninistische Strömung in Wien fordert in ihrer
>Stellungnahme (Anlage 2) dazu auf, in Jugoslawien jene Kräfte zu
>unterstützen,
>
>"· die den Bürgerkrieg zu verhindern trachten, der von Kostunica, der
>Opposition und dem Westen angezettelt wird,
>· die die Unabhängigkeit und den Widerstand Jugoslawiens und Serbiens
>gegen die Nato und ihre Neue Weltordnung tragen und für die vollständige
>Durchführung der UN-Resolution 1244 und die spätere Wiedereingliederung
>des Kosovos nach Jugoslawien eintreten,
>· für soziale Gerechtigkeit und Gleichheit stehen und die neoliberalen
>Rezepte des IWF, der WTO und der Weltbank ablehnen
>· den multinationalen Charakter Jugoslawiens sichern."
>
>Folgende Texte werden in den Anlagen dokumentiert:
>
>MIT WEICHEM GELD UND HARTEN DROHUNGEN:
>JUGOSLAWISCHE WAHLEN VON USA UND NATO GESTOHLEN.
>Von Sara Flounders
>Aus: "Workers World newspaper" v. 5.10.2000
>- Anlage 1 -
>( i s t b i s h e r a u f D e u t s c h n o c h n i c h t e r s c
>h i e n e n !)
>
>DEN VON KOSTUNICA UND DEM WESTEN ANGEZETTELTEN
>BÜRGERKRIEG VERHINDERN
>Erklärung des Exekutivkomitees der Internationalen Leninistischen
>Strömung
>Wien, 27. September 2000
>- Anlage 2 -
>
>AUSVERKAUF VERHANDELT
>BELGRADER OPPOSITIONSFÜHRER TRAFEN SICH MIT IWF-VERTRETERN IN BULGARIEN
>Von Michel Chossudovsky und Jared Israel
>Aus: junge Welt v. 04.10.2000
>Quelle des Originalartikels:
>http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/11.htm)
>- Anlage 3 -
>
>DEMOKRATISCHE UND FAIRE BEDINGUNGEN IM LAND SELBST,
>MASSIVE MANIPULATIONS- UND ERPRESSUNGSVERSUCHE VON AUSSEN -
>Fazit der deutschen Beobachter der Wahlen am 24. September 2000 in
>Jugoslawien
>- Anlage 4 -
>
>
>
>Mit internationalistischen Grüßen
>Klaus v. Raussendorff
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>Anti-Imperialistische Korrespondenz (AIK)
>Redaktion: Klaus von Raussendorff
>Postfach 210172, 53156 Bonn
>Tel.&Fax: 0228 – 34.68.50
>Email: raussendorff@...
>
>Anti-Imperialistische Online-Korrespondenz
>Webmaster: Dieter Vogel
>http://home.t-online.de/home/aik-web/
>Email: aik-web@...
>
>Wer die AIK nicht empfangen möchte,
>schicke bitte eine Mail mit dem Betreff
>"unsubscribe" an raussendorff@...
>
>*************************************************************************
>
>Anlage 1
>
>MIT WEICHEM GELD UND HARTEN DROHUNGEN:
>JUGOSLAWISCHE WAHLEN VON USA UND NATO GESTOHLEN.
>Von Sara Flounders
>
>
>Am 26. September gab die staatliche Wahlkommission in Jugoslawien die
>Ergebnisse der Wahlen vom 24. September bekannt. Der von der
>US-Regierung und der Europäische Union unterstützte Kandidat Vojislav
>Kostunica erhielt 48 Prozent gegenüber 40 Prozent für Präsident Slobodan
>Milosevic.
>
>Da keiner der Kandidaten über 50 Prozent erhielt, ist eine Stichwahl für
>den 8. Oktober angesetzt.
>
>Kostunicas unmittelbare Reaktion war die Weigerung, an der Stichwahl
>teilzunehmen und die Forderung, daß Milosevic die Niederlage eingesteht.
>Bill Clinton, der britische Außenminister Robin Cook und andere
>NATO-Führer, die Jugoslawien 1999 bombardiert hatten, forderten von
>Milosevic ebenfalls das Eingeständnis der Niederlage.
>
>Der erste Punkt, dessen sich die ganze internationale Bewegung, die sich
>dem NATO-Krieg gegen Jugoslawien widersetzte, bewußt sein muß, ist, daß
>die jugoslawischen Wahlen nicht "frei und fair" waren. Der Imperialismus
>hat die Wahlen durch himmelschreiende Erpressung, Bestechung und
>Einmischung gestohlen.
>
>Die Wahlen werfen eine grundsätzliche Frage auf. Wird Jugoslawien den
>westlichen Banken und Unternehmen ausgeliefert werden? Werden die
>Vermögenswerte der Industrieunternehmen ausgeschlachtet und
>verschleudert werden, wie in jedem anderen Land Osteuropas, in Russland
>und in den ehemaligen Sowjetrepubliken geschehen? Wird die Mehrheit der
>Bevölkerung zu einem Leben unterhalb der Armutsgrenze verurteilt werden?
>
>Die Wahlen vom 24. September umfaßten drei Ebenen der Stimmabgabe. Außer
>den Präsidentschaftswahlen gab es auch Kommunalwahlen, in denen die
>US-gestützte Opposition viele Städte und Ortschaften gewann.
>
>Und es gab auch eine Wahl zum jugoslawischen Bundesparlament. Die
>Koalition der Vereinigten Linken, der Sozialistischen Partei Serbiens
>und der SPS-Schwesterpartei in Montenegro erzielte eine starke Mehrheit
>in beiden Kammern. In Montenegro war sie ohne Gegner, da die
>pro-westliche Regierung sich der Wahlbeteiligung enthielt. Nach
>jugoslawischem Recht hat das Parlament mehr Rechte als der Präsident und
>bestimmt die Regierung durch Wahl des Premierministers.
>
>Aber ein Rückschlag für Milosevic bei den Präsidentschaftswahlen setzt
>mehr aufs Spiel als das Schicksal eines Einzelnen. Er war das Hauptziel
>des Krieges der USA und der NATO und der imperialistischen Weltmächte;
>und damit ergab sich, daß er den jugoslawischen Widerstand symbolisiert.
>Darüber hinaus stand er im Mittelpunkt der Koalition der Kräfte, die
>Jugoslawien während der 78 Tage der Bombardements führten.
>
>All die sozialen Errungenschaften eines unabhängigen Landes, das aus der
>imperialistischen Sklaverei ausgebrochen ist und jahrelang gegen
>Einkreisung und Krieg stand gehalten hat, sind nun in Gefahr.
>
>Westliche Einmischung verfälschte die Wahlen
>
>In dieser Wahl benutzten die Regierungen der USA und der EU jeden nur
>möglichen schmutzigen Trick, korrupte Machenschaften und Schmiergelder,
>und sie brüsteten sich noch damit. Bombendrohungen, Versprechungen, die
>neunjährigen Sanktionen einzustellen, Einschüchterungen und
>Militärmanöver heizten die Spannung an.
>
>Am Wahltag hielten das Pentagon und Kroatien ihre bis dahin größten
>gemeinsamen Truppenübungen, eine gemeinsame Landung auf einer Insel in
>der Adria in der Nähe von Montenegro, einem Teil Jugoslawiens, um eine
>Invasion zu simulieren. Fünfzehn britische Kriegsschiffe sind inzwischen
>ins Mittelmeer verlegt worden. Ein US-Flugzeugträger hat sich näher auf
>Montenegro zu bewegt.
>
>Die Grossmedien der USA, die New York Times am 20. September und die
>Washington Post am 19. September haben im Detail die genauen Beträge
>spezifiziert, die in die Parteien, Radiosender, Fernsehstationen und
>Zeitungen der Opposition geschleust wurden. Der Kongress der USA
>bewilligte in aller Öffentlichkeit 77 Millionen Dollar für offene
>Einmischung. Am 25. September verabschiedete das Repräsentantenhaus ein
>Gesetz zum Einsatz von weiteren 105 Millionen Dollar zur Unterstützung
>von Anti-Milosevic-Kräften in Serbien und Montenegro.
>
>Diese Artikel schildern die Übergabe von Koffern mit Bargeld an der
>Grenze, endlose Lieferungen von Komputern, Faxgeräten, Mobiltelefonen
>und Instrukteuren für ihren Einsatz. Diese Güter sind durch
>Frontorganisationen, Nichtregierungsorganisationen und Medienkanäle an
>die Opposition übergeben worden.
>
>Wochen vor der Wahl verkündeten vom Westen finanzierte Umfrageinstitute,
>daß Kostunica einen haushohen Wahlsieg erringen würde. Für das westliche
>Medienmonopol, das nach Jugoslawien ausstrahlte, gab es nur zwei
>Optionen. Entweder würde Milosevic gewinnen oder es würde zu massiven
>Wahlfälschungen kommen.
>
>Das US-Außenministerium kündigte an, daß Washington sich selbst dann,
>wenn Milosevic mit großem Abstand gewinnen würde, eine Anerkennung der
>Wahl verweigern würde.
>
>
>Wie sollten die sozialen Bewegungen diese Ereignisse bewerten?
>
>Für jene, die 1999 gegen die NATO-Bombardierungen demonstrierten, sowie
>für alle Aktivisten, die den Kampf gegen den Internationalen
>Währungsfonds, die Weltbank, die Globalisierung und die Schwitzbuden
>aufgenommen haben, stehen bei dem, was demnächst in Jugoslawien
>geschieht, auch ihre eigenen Interessen auf dem Spiel.
>
>Sind sie bereit, in Solidarität zu Jugoslawien zu stehen, welche
>Schritte auch immer notwendig sind, um ein weiteres Land davor zu
>bewahren, unter den Stiefel von IWF und Weltbank gezwungen zu werden?
>
>Washington, London, Paris und Berlin haben sich öffentlich eingemischt
>und sich dessen noch gerühmt. Angesichts dieser Eingeständnisse haben
>jene, die in Jugoslawien in staatlicher Verantwortung stehen, alles
>Recht die Wahlen für ungültig zu erklären und die Opposition zu
>disqualifizieren.
>
>Wäre in den Vereinigten Staaten, Frankreich, Großbritannien und
>Deutschland die Fortsetzung derartiger Wahlen zugelassen worden? In den
>Vereinigten Staaten darf keine politische Organisation Zuwendungen einer
>fremden Regierung für politische Zwecke annehmen, es sei denn, sie ist
>als Agentur einer ausländischen Macht amtlich registriert. Entschlossen
>wacht die herrschende Klasse der USA darüber, daß nur sie den
>Wahlproszess kontrolliert.
>
>Jeder US-Politiker, der ertappt wird, Spenden, Bestechungsgelder oder
>Zahlungen jeglicher Art von einer ausländischen Regierung angenommen zu
>haben, fällt in Ungnade, wird angegriffen und kann strafrechtlich
>belangt werden.
>
>Schon die vage Behauptung, die Clinton-Regierung habe von einem
>Geschäftsmann chinesischer Abstammung, der Kontakte mit China gehabt
>haben könnte, ein Spende angenommen, ließ jeden Politiker in Deckung
>gehen.
>
>
>Korruption und Verrat
>
>Wichtig ist anzuerkennen, daß die jugoslawische Regierung das moralische
>Recht hat, diese Wahl aufgrund der unverschämten ausländischen
>Einmischung für ungültig zu erklären. Sie hat jedes Recht, es
>abzulehnen, mit weiteren Wahlen unter den Bedingungen von Krieg,
>Sanktionen und Besatzung fortzufahren.
>
>Das Parlament hat jedes Recht, eine strafrechtliche Untersuchung der
>Finanzquellen der Opposition einzuleiten. Staatsanwälte haben jedes
>Recht, die Politiker und Publikationen, welche den Wahlprozess
>korrumpiert haben, anzuklagen und einzusperren.
>
>Die Massen haben jedes Recht auf die Straße zu gehen und die Parteien
>und Publikationen der Opposition als Agenten einer ausländischen Macht
>zu verurteilen.
>
>Kostunica, bisher ein kleiner als serbischer Nationalist geltender
>Politiker mit einer langen antikommunistischen Vergangenheit, erklärt
>beharrlich, nie Geld vom Westen angenommen zu haben. Er hat sogar die
>NATO-Bombardierungen und die Sanktionen kritisiert. Kein jugoslawischer
>Politiker könnte einen bedeutenden Stimmenanteil erreichen, wenn er als
>NATO-Marionette angesehen würde.
>
>Es mag stimmen, daß er persönlich kein Geld eingesteckt hat. Aber
>Kostunica hat sich mit politischen Parteien und Organisationen umgeben,
>die Speichellecker der NATO-Länder sind. Seine ganze Kampagne ist von
>Radiostationen, Fernsehstationen und Zeitungen propagiert worden, die
>gänzlich und öffentlich durch Zuwendungen aus Washington und Berlin
>finanziert werden.
>
>Er wird von den imperialistischen Mächten der USA und der EU
>unterstützt, weil sein politisches Programm, selbst wenn es die NATO
>kritisiert, sich gerade die Politiken zu eigen macht, die von der NATO
>gefordert werden. Er ist unter den Politiker derjenige, der am
>leichtesten in einen Strohmann zu verwandeln ist, weil er keine
>persönliche Machtbasis hat. Er ist der Kandidat eines Blocks von 18
>kleinen, zerstrittenen politischen Parteien, die keine gemeinsamen
>Interessen oder ideologischen Orientierungen haben. Vereint sind sie nur
>durch die Gegnerschaft zur Regierung und die Bereitschaft ausländische
>Finanzmittel anzunehmen.
>
>
>US-gesteuerte Staatsstreiche und Konterrevolutionen
>
>Die großen US-Monopole und -Banken sowie Washington haben nie Wahlen als
>"frei und fair" akzeptiert, wenn diese ihre Klasseninteressen
>gefährdeten oder den Massen Einfluß einräumten. Seit Ende des zweiten
>Weltkrieges hat die Regierung der USA den Sturz von mehr als 50
>Regierungen bewerkstelligt.
>
>In Chile organisierte die CIA 1973 einen Militärputsch, um die
>fortschrittliche legal gewählte Regierung in Blut zu ertränken. Gleiches
>tat sie 1953 im Iran und 1954 in Guatemala.
>
>Im Jahre 1990 orchestrierten die USA den Sturz der Sandinisten in
>Nicaragua. Washington hatte ein Koalition aus 20 Parteien zusammen
>geschustert, deren einziges Ziel es war, die Regierung zu stürzen und
>die alten besitzenden Klassen wieder zu installieren. Washington
>versprach, den "Contra"-Krieg und die Sanktionen zu beenden und massive
>Hilfe zur Verfügung zu stellen, falls die populären Sandinisten
>geschlagen würden.
>
>In dieser Lage, die der heutigen in Jugoslawien sehr ähnlich ist, gelang
>es Washington, die Wahlen zu manipulieren, um die Sandinisten zu
>vertreiben. Aber die USA kamen nie mit der Hilfe über, und heute sind
>einige der am niedrigsten bezahlten Schwitzbuden der Welt in der
>"Freihandelszone" von Nicaragua in Betrieb.
>
>
>"Freie Wahlen" in einem Land im Belagerungszustand?
>
>Jugoslawien verdeutlicht wie Nicaragua die Gefahren einer Wahl bei
>Andauern eines unerbittlichen Krieges, unmenschlicher Sanktionen und der
>Besetzung eines Teils des Landes durch fremde Armeen. Mit der Herrschaft
>über die Weltmedien, dem Köder materieller Vorteile, Bestechungen und
>der Androhung künftiger Bestrafung waren diese Mächte in der Lage,
>mitten in das Land einzugreifen.
>
>Präsident Milosevic unternahm den Versuch, durch Ansetzung von Wahlen
>ein Mandat zu erhalten, als die Opposition gespalten, schwach und
>diskreditiert erschien. Aber umgehend machten die Imperialisten sie
>stark, indem sie Taktiken benutzen, die in Jahrzehnten der
>Interventionen verfeinert worden waren.
>
>Jugoslawien, ein kleines belagertes Land, das um sein Überleben kämpft,
>hat Dutzenden von offen pro-imperialistischen Parteien erlaubt, Büros
>und Mitarbeiterstäbe zu unterhalten, Zeitungen herauszugeben und an
>Wahlen teilzunehmen. Diese Konzessionen haben die Feinde der
>jugoslawischen Arbeiter nur weiter ermutigt.
>
>Obgleich die Imperialisten sich beschwerten, daß ihnen nicht gestattet
>wurde, die Wahlen zu überwachen, kamen hunderte von Ausländern als
>Wahlbeobachter ins Land und bestätigten, daß sie "frei und fair" waren,
>daß die Regierung sich ehrlich und rechtskonform an alle
>Wahlvorschriften gehalten hat. Aber dies lenkte die Aufmerksamkeit von
>dem wirklichen Betrug ab, der tatsächlich stattfand, von der massiven
>Intervention und Einschüchterung durch den Imperialismus.
>
>Die politische Opposition erhielt die Erlaubnis für eine praktisch
>uneingeschränkte Annahme ausländischer Hilfe, Beratung und
>Medienwerbung. Der ganze Prozess wurde durch eine Armee von westlichen
>Beratern und Meinungsbefragern korrumpiert.
>
>
>Werden die Kräfte der USA und der NATO Erfolg haben?
>
>Berichte von Wahlbeobachtern und selbst von Konzernmedien zeigen, daß es
>einen harten Kern von Unterstützung aus der Arbeiterklasse für Milosevic
>von Seiten jener gibt, die in ihm den Verteidiger des Landes gegen die
>NATO sehen. Selbst unter solchen, die aus Ärger über Milosevic naiv für
>Kostunica gestimmt haben, sind viele, die sich dem westlichen
>Imperialismus widersetzen möchten.
>
>Die Frage, vor der die jugoslawischen Massen nun stehen, ist: Werden die
>westlichen transnationalen Unternehmen auf Grund dieser durch
>Intervention verfälschten Wahl in der Lage sein, den Staatsapparat zu
>erobern und die Tür zu einer Superausbeutung öffnen?
>
>Wenn die linken Organisationen und patriotischen Parteien in Jugoslawien
>Widerstand leisten, werden sie dann von den fortschrittlichen, Arbeiter-
>und Antikriegsbewegungen im Westen gegen den unausbleiblichen
>Propagandablitzkrieg aus dem Westen und einen möglichen neuen
>Militärschlag verteidigt werden?
>
>
>Was kann getan werden?
>
>Ein Beitrag zu dieser Anstrengung könnte in einer
>Untersuchungskommission bestehen, um die korrumpierende Rolle zu
>erforschen, welche die US-Regierung, die Europäische Union, und die NATO
>als ihr militärischer Arm, sowie ihre Internationalen
>Finanzorganisationen bei den jugoslawischen Wahlen gespielt haben.
>
>Diese Untersuchung könnte im Bezug auf die Bemühungen dieser
>Institutionen, die jugoslawische Regierung zu untergraben und zu
>stürzen, Informationen zusammentragen und öffentlich machen. Sie könnte
>auch Informationen über die offene und heimliche Finanzierung von
>politischen Parteien, Organisationen und Publikationen durch
>US-Regierungsagenturen sammeln.
>
>Die Untersuchung könnte das Problem Jugoslawiens dadurch international
>verständlicher machen, daß sie auch Zeugenaussagen und Berichte über
>US-Interventionen in innere Angelegenheiten anderer Regierungen mit
>umfaßt. Einbezogen würden somit der Sturz anderer populärer Regierungen
>in Guatemala, Panama, Chile, Iran und Indonesien sowie auch die
>Einmischung in Wahlen in Italien, Haiti, Nicaragua, Guyana und andere
>Länder.
>
>Aktivisten in anderen NATO-Ländern könnten ihre eigene
>Untersuchungskommission und öffentliche Hearings organisieren, um zu
>untersuchen, in wie weit diese jüngste Intervention ihre eigenen Gesetze
>verletzt. Ähnliche Informationen kamen bereits zuvor dadurch ans Licht,
>daß Hearings und Tribunale in vielen Ländern die Führer der USA und der
>NATO wegen Kriegsverbrechen gegen Jugoslawien anklagten.
>
>Die Bedeutung internationaler Solidarität sollte nie unterschätzt
>werden. Jugoslawien darf nicht allein gelassen werden.
>Übersetzung aus dem Amerikanischen: Klaus von Raussendorff
>
>***************************************************************************
******
>
>DEN VON KOSTUNICA UND DEM WESTEN ANGEZETTELTEN
>BÜRGERKRIEG VERHINDERN
>Erklärung des Exekutivkomitees der Internationalen Leninistischen
>Strömung
>Wien, 27. September 2000
>Quelle: Email-Mitteilung vom 28. September 2000
>
>
>Die Wahlen in Jugoslawien waren vor allem durch die massive Einmischung
>desWestens gekennzeichnet. Die Opposition wurde nicht nur mit
>ungeheurenGeldbeträgen unterstützt, man versprach die Aufhebung
>dermenschenverachteten Sanktionen für den Fall, dass der westliche
>Kandidatgewönne, die gleichgeschaltete internationalen Medienmaschine
>zogen abermalsin den Krieg gegen Milosevic, sondern man stieß abermals
>militärischeDrohungen mit Manövern in Kroatien, Rumänien und Bulgarien
>sowie durchKanonenboote in der Adria aus – ganz zu schweigen von der
>politischen,wirtschaftlichen und militärischen Aggression des
>vergangenen Jahrzehnts mitdem Ziel den Widerstand des jugoslawischen und
>serbischen Volkes zuzerstören. Unter diesen Bedingungen konnte keine
>Wahl frei, fair unddemokratische Wahl sein.
>
>Wir sind nicht in der Lage die Richtigkeit des Wahlergebnisses
>zuverifizieren, aber was wir sicher wissen ist, dass der Imperialismus
>auf derganzen Welt Wahlen manipuliert und fälsch was das Zeug hält um
>seineMarionetten an der Macht zu halten. Mit ihrer Medienmaschine ist es
>ihnenkein Problem selbst die schlimmsten Diktaturen wie jene Fujimoris
>in Peruweißzuwaschen. Es gibt daher keinerlei Anlass ihrem Geschrei
>vonWahlfälschung glauben zu schenken zumal Wahlbeobachter aus der ganzen
>Welt(ausgenommen die Nato-Aggressor-Staaten) berichteten, dass es zu
>keinengröberen Unregelmäßigkeiten gekommen wäre.
>
>Allein die Tatsache, dass Kostunica und die bürgerliche Opposition
>nichtbereit ist an den Stichwahlen teilzunehmen, zeigt deren Angst sie
>zuverlieren. Mit der Unterstützung ihrer westlichen Herrn haben sie
>esvorgezogen zum Angriff überzugehen, indem sie die Wahlen boykottieren,
>zuMassenprotesten auf der Straße und selbst zum Generalstreik aufrufen
>umMilosevic zu stürzen. Sie versuchen damit das erschöpfte Volk in
>einenblutigen und brudermörderischen Bürgerkrieg zu stürzen, der das
>Land undseine Fähigkeit gegen die Neue Weltordnung Widerstand zu leisten
>nur weiterschwächt würde und daher einzig und allein im Interesse des
>Imperialismusund seiner lokalen Agenten ist.
>
>Das zeigt die Komplizenschaft Kostunicas mit dem Imperialismus und der
>Nato,die dieser bisher geschickt hinter einer nationalistischen Maste
>zuverstecken verstand. Er behauptete, er wäre gegen die Nato-Krieg und
>für dieWiedereingliederung des Kosovos. Tatsächlich ist der
>Oppositionsblock ausden offensten und schlimmsten Hampelmännern der Nato
>wie beispielsweiseDjindjic zusammengesetzt. Der wirkliche Charakter
>Kostunicas kommt nicht nurdurch die gigantischen Geldflüsse ans
>Tageslicht, sondern auch durch seineUnterstützung für die Vorschläge der
>sogenannten G17, die nichts anderessind als eine Kopie der Programme des
>IWF, der WTO und der Weltbank, die diehalbkoloniale Aussaugung des
>Landes nach dem Vorbild Bulgariens oderRusslands zum Ziel haben. Doch
>selbst wenn sich Serbien ergeben und demDiktat der Neuen Weltordnung
>unterordnen sollte, so wie es Kostunica vorhat, wird dies den von den
>Auswirkungen der westlichen Aggressionzerrütteten jugoslawischen Massen
>keine Hilfe und Verbesserung ihrer Lagebringen. Denn das Ziel des
>Imperialismus ist die Zerstörung Jugoslawiens undSerbiens als dem
>strategischen Haupthindernis für die Durchdringung undHerrschaft über
>den Balkan.
>
>Dass Milosevic das Land in eine Krise geführt hat, ist allerdings
>wahr.Ausdruck dessen sind sowohl die Vereinbarungen von Dayton (die in
>dervergeblichen Hoffnung eine Konfrontation vermeiden zu können große
>TeileBosniens dem Imperialismus überließen), die Korruption in der
>führendenSchicht, ihre Bereicherung durch Privatisierungen und nicht
>zuletzt dieheutige gefährliche Konfrontation: die Verfassungsänderung in
>Richtung einerPräsidialrepublik war ein schwerer Fehler und konnte nicht
>anders als einenZusammenstoss bewirken, der durch einen vom Parlament
>gewählten Präsidentenhätte verhindert werden können. Nichtsdestotrotz
>war es der an der Machtbefindliche soziale Block der Jugoslawien als
>einen von derimperialistischen Neuen Weltordnung unabhängigen Staat
>verteidigte undwichtige soziale Errungenschaften der Bauern, Arbeiter
>und der Volksmassenim allgemeinen sowie den multinationalen Charakter
>der Gesellschaftbewahrte.
>
>Der Zusammenstoss zwischen der bürgerlichen Opposition und
>demRegierungsblock der SPS ist daher gleichzeitig sowohl eine
>Konfrontationzwischen dem Imperialismus und einem um die Bewahrung
>seiner Freiheitkämpfenden Volk als auch ein Klassenkonflikt. Es handelt
>sich um dieFortsetzung der bereits seit zehn Jahren andauernden
>imperialistischenAggression, die jedoch ihr Ziel, die vollständige
>Unterordnung undZerstörung Jugoslawiens und Serbiens selbst mit dem
>Nato-Krieg desvergangenen Jahres nach wie vor nicht erreichen konnte.
>Der Umstand, dassMilosevic den Kampf der jugoslawischen und serbischen
>Massen in eineSackgasse geführt hat, ändern nichts am fortschrittlichen
>undantiimperialistischen Charakter des von ihm geführten Blocks der
>einfachenVolksmassen.
>
>Die antiimperialistischen, revolutionären und kommunistischen Kräfte
>inJugoslawien und auf der ganzen Welt müssen jene unterstützen die:
>
>· den Bürgerkrieg zu verhindern trachten, der von Kostunica, der
>Oppositionund dem Westen angezettelt wird,
>· die die Unabhängigkeit und den Widerstand Jugoslawiens und Serbiens
>gegendie Nato und ihre Neue Weltordnung tragen und für die
>vollständigeDurchführung der UN-Resolution 1244 und die spätere
>Wiedereingliederung desKosovos nach Jugoslawien eintreten,
>· für soziale Gerechtigkeit und Gleichheit stehen und die
>neoliberalenRezepte des IWF, der WTO und der Weltbank ablehnen
>· den multinationalen Charakter Jugoslawiens sichern.
>
>Gleichzeitig muss auf dieser Basis eine unabhängige Bewegung der
>Volksmassen
>aufgebaut werden.
>
>Exekutivkomitee der Internationalen Leninistischen Strömung
>Wien, 27. September 2000
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>Kontakt:
>Revolutionär Kommunistische Liga (RKL)
>(österr. Sektion der Internationalen Leninistischen Strömung - ILS)
>PF 23, A-1040 Wien, Österreich
>Tel & Fax +43 1 504 00 10
>rkl@...
>members.magnet.at/rkl
>www.antiimperialista.com
>Konto PSK 92 125 137 BLZ 60000
>
>
>
>***************************************************************************
*
>
>Anlage 3
>
>AUSVERKAUF VERHANDELT
>BELGRADER OPPOSITIONSFÜHRER TRAFEN SICH MIT IWF-VERTRETERN IN BULGARIEN
>Von Michel Chossudovsky und Jared Israel
>Aus: junge Welt v. 04.10.2000
>Quelle des Originalartikels:
>http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/11.htm)
>
>Die jugoslawische Bevölkerung dürfte sich kaum bewußt sein, daß zwei
>prominente Mitglieder derDemokratischen Opposition Serbiens (DOS) soeben
>eine sehr wichtige Reise nach Bulgarien unternommenhaben. Dort trafen
>sie Vertreter des Internationalen Währungsfonds (IWF), der Weltbank und
>derNATO-Regierungen bei einer sogenannten »Geberkonferenz«. Der Zweck
>der Reise bestand darin,Vorkehrungen für die Übernahme Jugoslawiens
>durch die NATO-Regierungen zu treffen.
>
>Die Reise wurde am Tag nach den jugoslawischen Wahlen angekündigt.
>Mladjan Dinkic, derhöchstwahrscheinliche Finanzminister in einer
>Regierung der Opposition, »sagte, daß sich Vertreter seinerG-17-Plus in
>dieser Woche zu einer Geberkonferenz über Jugoslawien mit Vertretern des
>InternationalenWährungsfonds nach Bulgarien begeben würden« (UPI vom
>27.9.00).
>
>Dinkic wurde von Dr. Dragoslav Avramovic, einem Wirtschaftsfachman der
>»Allianz für den Wandel« vonZoran Djindjic begleitet. An diese Gruppen
>der sogenannten demokratischen Opposition sind von Agenturender US-
>Regierung Riesensummen gezahlt worden.
>
>Dinkic erklärte gegenüber United Press International, daß »Dragoslav
>Avramovic eine Absichtserklärung(Letter of Intent) mit einem Antrag an
>den IWF und die Weltbank verfaßt habe. Dinkic sagte, er erwarte,
>daßdaraufhin Verhandlungen mit Geberländern, dem sogenannten Pariser
>Club folgen würden...« Das sind dieNATO-Länder. Ein »Letter of Intent«
>schließt ein »Memorandum über wirtschaftliche und finanziellePolitiken«
>ein. Darin werden die Bedingungen festgelegt, unter denen ganz
>Jugoslawien der Kontrollewestlicher Geber und Gläubiger unterstellt
>würde. Nur ein vom Parlament bestätigter jugoslawischerFinanzminister
>hat das Recht, einen »Letter of Intent« zu formulieren. Dinkic und
>Avramovic hingegen vertretennur die »demokratische« Opposition. In
>welchem Lande ist es Elementen der Opposition legalerweise gestattet,mit
>Feindstaaten, die ihre Bewegung finanzieren, zu »verhandeln«? Das ist
>ein Extremfall von Einmischungdurch die NATO- Länder.
>
>Welche Maßnahmen möchten die NATO-Länder durchsetzen?
>
>- Abbau aller Preiskontrollen durch die Regierung
>
>- Einführung »freier Märkte« ohne Schutz für Landwirte oder Unternehmen
>vor Überschwemmung durchausländische Güter
>
>- Abbau des ganzen Sozialsystems. Keine staatliche Hilfe durch
>Gesundheitsfürsorge, öffentlicheVerkehrsmittel, Lebensmittel und Heizung
>
>- Sperre für Kredite an Unternehmen
>
>- Massive Entlassungen von Arbeitern und drastische
>Einkommensminderungen für Arbeiter und Bauern
>
>- Zwangsliquidierung von wichtigen Unternehmen und Industriezweigen des
>öffentlichen und privaten Sektors
>
>- Übertragung jeglicher weiteren Wiederaufbauarbeiten zur Beseitigung
>der Bombenschäden an Unternehmenaus NATO-Ländern.
>
>Das Ergebnis dieser Politik wäre: Die Nahrungsmittelpreise würden in die
>Höhe schnellen, Unternehmenwürden in den Bankrott und in die Liquidation
>getrieben werden, ausländisches Kapital würde die ganzeWirtschaft an
>sich raffen.
>
>Der »Letter of Intent« würde die Annahme der politischen Bedingungen
>Washingtons erzwingen. Diese sindsoeben in dem sogenannten Serbian
>Democratization Act HR 1064 dargelegt worden. Es wurde
>vomUS-Repräsentantenhaus am 25. September angenommen, an dem Tag, an dem
>Dinkic seine Reise nachBulgarien ankündigte. Gutes Timing. Nach den
>Bestimmungen dieses Gesetzes muß Jugoslawien, um von denSanktionen
>befreit und zum IWF »zugelassen« zu werden,
>
>1) Verhandlungen über die Unabhängigkeit (sprich Abtrennung) des Kosovo
>und wahrscheinlich auch derVojvodina aufnehmen;
>
>2) das Land vollständig »demokratisieren«. »Demokratisierung« ist eine
>Codewort für die Durchführung allerAnweisungen der US-Regierung;
>
>3) »alle Fragen mit den anderen Republiken« regeln. Dies würde die 50
>Milliarden US-Dollar einschließen,welche die kroatische Regierung und
>die Izetbegovic-Regierung in Bosnien als Kriegsreparationen
>verlangen.Das Geld ginge unversehens an die Gläubiger dieser Länder, und
>zwar an die NATO-Regierungen und an diewestlichen Banken;
>
>4) vollständige Zusammenarbeit »mit dem Internationalen Straftribunal
>für das frühere Jugoslawien,einschließlich der Überstellung aller von
>dem Tribunal angeklagten Personen an Den Haag«. Das bedeutet, daßdie
>jugoslawische Armee auf jede Person Jagd machen müßte, von der das
>Haager Tribunal behauptet, eshandele sich um einen Kriegsverbrecher.
>Jeder Führer des Widerstands könnte auf die Haager Geheimlistefingierter
>Kriegsverbrecher gesetzt werden.
>
>All dies macht vollkommen klar, daß Herrn Kostunicas Versprechen, mit
>dem Internationalen Währungsfondszusammenzuarbeiten aber gleichzeitig
>»Jugoslawien zu bewahren«, leere Worte sind. Sie klingen gut,
>bedeutenaber nichts. Mit der Zustimmung zur Abfassung eines »Letter of
>Intent« hat Kostunicas Koalition an dernationalen Souveränität bereits
>Fahnenflucht begangen. Sie hat Jugoslawien, seine Wirtschaft,
>seineInstitutionen und seine Bevölkerung verkauft.
>
>Inzwischen ermächtigt das US-Gesetz HR 1064 die US- Regierung, der
>sogenannten demokratischen Oppositionund der sezessionistischen
>Regierung in Montenegro sofort weitere 105 Millionen US-Dollar zukommen
>zulassen. Amerikanisches Geld - zusammen mit Mitteln aus anderen Quellen
>- wird nicht nur Wahlkampfkostendecken, sondern auch Gehälter
>finanzieren.
>
>Washington und die NATO bezahlen Schlüsselfiguren der Opposition ganz
>offen dafür, daß sie tun, was manihnen sagt. Sie stehen auf der
>Gehaltsliste der NATO-Bombenwerfer.
>
>(Übersetzung aus dem Amerikanischen: Klaus von Raussendorff)
>
>
>***************************************************************************
*
>
>Anlage 4
>Erklärung der Wahlbeobachter aus Deutschland:
>DEMOKRATISCHE UND FAIRE BEDINGUNGEN IM LAND SELBST,
>MASSIVE MANIPULATIONS- UND ERPRESSUNGSVERSUCHE VON AUSSEN -
>Fazit der deutschen Beobachter der Wahlen am 24. September 2000 in
>Jugoslawien
>
>Entgegen der von Medien und Politikern im Westen verbreiteten
>Informationen, dass die jugoslawischen Wahlen unter Ausschluss
>unabhängiger internationaler Beobachter stattgefunden hätten, haben
>tatsächlich 210 Wahlbeobachter aus 54 Ländern, unter ihnen 52
>Abgeordnete, den Wahlverlauf verfolgt.
>Als Wahlbeobachter aus Deutschland, eingeladen vom Jugoslawischen
>Bundesparlament, sind wir überrascht, dass unsere Arbeit in der
>deutschen Öffentlichkeit nicht wahrgemommen wird, und erst recht diese
>Chance zur Information aus erster Hand nicht genutzt wird.
>Wir hoffen sehr, dass dies nicht seine Ursache darin hat, dass manche
>interessierten Seiten schon vor Öffnung der Wahllokale am 24. September
>2000 „wissen" wollten, dass die Wahlen gefälscht würden, und
>„Ergebnisse" der Wahlen bereits verkündeten, bevor die Stimmen
>ausgezählt waren.
>Wir hatten als Wahlbeobachter jede Möglichkeit, uns frei zu bewegen,
>Überprüfungen vor Ort vorzunehmen, die Bedingungen und den Ablauf der
>Wahlen in allen Phasen zu kontrollieren. Mehrere hundert Wahllokale
>wurden von den Beobachtern unangemeldet besucht. Daher stellen wir fest,
>dass unsere Beobachtungen mit unseren eigenen Augen und mit eigenem
>kritischen Verstand vorgenommen wurden, und dass wir daher den Wert
>unserer Beobachtungen und Festellungen anders einschätzen als jene
>diversen Stellungnahmen von Politikern, die mit Informationen aus
>dritter Hand in der Regel ihre vorgefasste Meinung bestätigt sehen
>wollen.
> Die Internationale Beobachterkommission der Wahlen am 24. September
>2000 hat in einer gemeinsamen Erklärung festgestellt, dass die Wahlen
>demokratisch und fair verlaufen sind, und die Standards von
>demokratischen Wahlen in anderen Ländern voll erfüllt haben. Dieser
>Feststellung wie der Gesamtstellungnahme der Internationalen Kommission
>schliesst sich die deutsche Beobachtergruppe voll inhaltlich an. Sie
>unterstreicht dabei besonders die Kritik hinsichtlich des skandalösen,
>umfassenden Drucks (bis zur Existenzbedrohung), mit denen die Wähler in
>Montenegro durch die Djukanovic-Regierung von der Ausübung ihres
>Wahlrechts abgehalten werden sollten. Dies ist mit dem Grundsatz fairer
>und freier, demokratischer und rechtsstaatlich einwandfreier Wahlen
>nicht in Einklang zu bringen.
>Wir unterstützen ebenso und aus den gleichen Gründen die Kritik an der
>massiven ausländischen Einmischung in den Wahlkampf, sei es in Form
>einer 77-Millionen-US-Dollarspende an bestimmte kandidierende
>Gruppierungen, sei es durch „Wahlversprechen" der EU, man werde bei ein
>bestimmtes Wählervotum durch Aufhebung von Sanktionen honorieren. Von
>jedem freien, zivilisierten und demokratischen Land würden derartige
>Versuche der politischen Einmischung und Erpressung energisch
>zurückgewiesen, und wir befürchten, dass solche Parteinahme vor den
>Wahlen die Bereitschaft beeinträchtigen könnte, den Ablauf und die
>Ergebnisse der Wahlen unvoreingenommen und objektiv zur Kenntnis zu
>nehmen und das Recht zur selbständigen Entscheidung der Bevölkerung
>über die eigene Zukunft zu akzeptieren.
>Die Internationale Beobachterkommission insgesamt hat sich ebenso wie
>wir deutschen Beobachter jede Mühe gemacht, mögliche Fehler,
>Unkorrektheiten oder Fälschungsbemühungen zu identifizieren. Wir konnten
>keine diesbezüglichen Feststellungen treffen. In Einzelfällen war der
>Sichtschutz zur Sicherstellung der geheimen Stimmabgabe mangelhaft, was
>dann sofort nach unserer Intervention korrigiert wurde. In
>Einzelfällen waren Wahlwillige nicht in den Wählerlisten verzeichnet,
>entsprechend den Problemen in Deutschland, wenn Wahlberechtigte ihre
>Eintragung in der Wählerliste nicht vorher prüfen. Gehäuft traten solche
>Probleme der fehlenden Verzeichnung in den Wählerlisten bei jenen auf,
>die seit Übernahme der Verwaltung durch UNMIK/KFOR aus Kosovo und
>Metohija gewaltsam vertrieben wurden. Hier gabe es offenkundig
>Abstimmungsprobleme mit den Listen des Roten Kreuzes, in denen offenbar
>nicht alle Vertriebenen erfasst sind.
> Grundsätzlich ist aber festzuhalten, dass - von diesen Einwänden
>abgesehen – die Wahlen in Übereinstimmung mit den gesetzlichen
>Vorschriften stattfanden, diese Vorschriften internationalen
>rechtsstaatlichen Masstäben entsprechen, und die Durchführung der Wahlen
>korrekt und professionell erfolgte. Wir konnten uns davon überzeugen,
>dass es in Jugoslawien gelungen ist, trotz widriger Umstände - durch
>acht Jahre Wirtschaftssanktionen und den völkerrechtswidrigen
>Angriffskrieg der NATO 1999 – die allgemeinen Bedingungen für
>demokratische Wahlen zu schaffen, ebenso für die Tätigkeit und das
>Zusammenwirken unterschiedlicher politischer Kräfte. Die Rechtmässigkeit
>und Legitimität der Wahlen steht somit ausser Frage.
> Zum Wahlablauf konnten wir konkret feststellen:
>1. Die Wahlurnen in den Wahllokalen wurden bei Öffnung der Wahllokale
>versiegelt, nachdem durch den ersten Wähler festgestellt und mit
>Unterschrift bestätigt wurde, dass sie leer waren. Die Stimmzettel
>wurden in abgezählter Stückzahl in versiegelten Paketen unmittelbar vor
>der Wahl ausgeliefert, ihr Empfang war zu quittieren, die nicht
>verbrauchten Stimmzettel mussten nach Abschluss der Stimmabgabe gezählt,
>die Zahl quittiert und als versiegeltes Paket zurückgegeben werden.
>2. In allen Wahlkomitees waren Vertreter der an der Wahl teilnehmenden
>Parteien / Gruppierungen, einschliesslich der Oppositionsparteien,
>beteiligt. Die Auszählung der Stimmen erfolgte gemeinsam. Über die
>Gültigkeit zweifelhafter Stimmzettel wurde abgestimmt. Das Protokoll mit
>dem Wahlergebnis wurde von allen Mitgliedern unterzeichnet.
>3. Von diesem Protokoll wurden sechs Exemplare angefertigt. Das erste
>Exemplar ging mit allen Wahlunterlagen an das Wahlkomitee des jeweiligen
>Wahlkreises. Das zweite wurde an der Eingangstür des Wahllokals
>ausgehängt. Die vier verbleibenden Exemplare wurden unmittelbar an die
>Vertreter der vier Parteien / Gruppierungen ausgehändigt, deren
>Kandidaten die meisten Stimmen auf sich vereinigen konnten. Alle
>übrigen Parteien / Gruppierungen hatten Anspruch auf Aushändigung einer
>Protokoll-Kopie innerhalb von 12 Stunden.
>4. Eine nochmalige Stimmzählung auf örtlicher oder Wahlkreisebene findet
>nicht statt. Es gilt ausschliesslich das original im Wahllokal
>festgestellte und von allen unterzeichnete Ergebnis, eine nachträgliche
>Veränderung dieser ursprünglichen Zahlen ist somit ausgeschlossen.
>5. Die Wahlergebnisse auf Bundeseben werden auf Basis sämtlicher
>Prokolle aus den Wahllokalen von der Bundeswahlkommission in den Rechner
>eingegeben. Die eingegeben Zahlen können eingesehen und von den
>Parteivertretern, die auch einen Platz in der Bundeswahlkommission
>haben, mit den Zahlen der in ihrer Hand befindlichen Einzelprotokollen
>verglichen werden.
>6. Vorsorglich hat die deutsche Beobachtergruppe stichprobenartig
>Ergebnisse aus Wahllokalen notiert und mit den Eingaben im zentralen
>Rechner der Bundeswahlkommission verglichen – mit dem Ergebnis, dass die
>Eingaben korrekt erfolgt sind.
>Aufgrund dieses festgestellten Verfahrens sind die in westlichen Medien
>behaupteten „gestohlenen Stimmen" oder Wahlfälschungen technisch
>praktisch nicht durchführbar. Dies hat der Wahlkampfmanager der DOS,
>Zoran Djindjic, auf Befragen ausdrücklich bestätigt.
>Wiederholt wurde nach der Wahl von verschiedenen Seiten das „lange
>Schweigen" der Wahlkommission kritisiert, während die verschiedenen
>Parteien sich ständig mit neuen Siegesmeldungen zu übertreffen
>versuchten, wobei sie sich jeweils nur auf jenen Teil der von ihnen
>selektiv ausgewählten Wahlprotokolle stützten.
>Das Zusammenführen der einzelnen Wahlergebnisse in der Rechenzentrale
>der Bundeswahlkommission als Grundlage offizieller Ergebnisse erklärt,
>für die Wahlbeobachter nachvollziehbar, den beanspruchten Zeitbedarf.
>Die Wahlkommission ist gesetzlich verpflichtet, das amtliche Endergebnis
>binnen 72 Stunden nach Schliessung der Wahllokale bekanntzugeben. Eine
>ständige Bekanntgabe nicht repräsentativer Zwischenergebnisse würde nur
>der Tendenz zur subjektiven Interpretation im Sinne vorweggenommener
>Endergebnisse Vorschub leisten. Die an die Fristen zur Bekanntgabe des
>Wahlergebnisses geknüpften Spekulationen und Unterstellungen einer
>Fälschungsmöglichkeit sind unhaltbar.
>Die Wahlbeobachter kritisieren, dass bestimmte Politiker der EU und der
>USA ihre Missachtung der demokratischen Willensbildung der Bevölkerung
>dadurch ausgedrückt haben, Wahlsieger zu ernennen, ohne Wahlverfahren
>und die tatsächlichen Wahlergebnisse zu kennen. Diese Einmischung ist
>umso verwerflicher, als sie mit der Androhung von Sanktionen verbunden
>isrt..
>Die Wahlbeobachter geben ihrer Überzeugung Ausdruck, dass Frieden,
>Stabilität und Partnerschaft zwischen allen Staaten nur auf der
>Grundlage der Respektierung gleicher Rechte, der Souveränität und
>Gleichheit gedeihen können.
>
>Belgrad, 26. September 2000 - Für die deutsche Beobachtergruppe:
>
>gez.
>Klaus Hartmann, Präsident der Weltunion der Freidenker;
>Ralph Hartmann; Botschafter a.D.;
>Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Richter, Vors. d. Ges. zum Schutz der Bürgerrechte
>und Menschenwürde;
>Elmar Schmähling, ehem. Flottillenadmiral.
>
>
>
>E N D E
COLPO DI SCENA: LA JUGOSLAVIA NON ERA UNA DITTATURA,
IL PRESIDENTE NON HA POTERI SOSTANZIALI!
JUGOSLAVIA: QUALI POTERI HA IL PRESIDENTE
(ANSA) - BELGRADO, 8 OTT -
Il neo presidente jugoslavo Voijslav Kostunica deve fare i conti, oltre che con gli
enormi problemi del suo paese, con una costituzione - del 1992 - che e' molto
sbilanciata in favore del parlamento nella divisione dei poteri.
E poiche' la costituzione fa del capo dello stato federale una figura quasi notarile
se non ha la maggioranza parlamentare,
sara' di enorme importanza come si orienteranno, alla fine, i 47 deputati
montenegrini del partito socialista popolare (Snp),
finora alleati di Milosevic ma che mostrano segni di ripensamento. Se si schiereranno
con i deputati l'Opposizione democratica serba (Dos), Kostunica avra' la
maggioranza, altrimenti la manterra' la coalizione guidata da Milosevic.
Secondo la costituzione, il parlamento ha il diritto di nominare e destituire i
ministri e di ratificare o meno il premier designato dal presidente. Il presidente ha
il diritto, se non riesce a formare un governo, di sciogliere le camere e di indire nuove
elezioni entro 90 giorni. Il controllo delle forze armate e' del Consiglio supremo di
difesa di cui il capo dello stato e' presidente ma dal cui parere questi non
puo' prescindere. La politica economica e sociale e la politica estera sono prerogativa
del governo.
Il parlamento federale e' composto di due camere: camera alta con 40 membri (20
serbi e 20 montenegrini) e camera bassa con 138 deputati, 30 montenegrini e 108
serbi. (ANSA)
OT-PAN
08/10/2000 20:22
===
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eCircle ti offre una nuova opportunita:
la tua agenda sul web - per te e per i tuoi amici
Organizza on line i tuoi appuntamenti .
E' facile, veloce e gratuito!
Da oggi su
http://www.ecircle.de/ad176952/www.ecircle.it
IL PRESIDENTE NON HA POTERI SOSTANZIALI!
JUGOSLAVIA: QUALI POTERI HA IL PRESIDENTE
(ANSA) - BELGRADO, 8 OTT -
Il neo presidente jugoslavo Voijslav Kostunica deve fare i conti, oltre che con gli
enormi problemi del suo paese, con una costituzione - del 1992 - che e' molto
sbilanciata in favore del parlamento nella divisione dei poteri.
E poiche' la costituzione fa del capo dello stato federale una figura quasi notarile
se non ha la maggioranza parlamentare,
sara' di enorme importanza come si orienteranno, alla fine, i 47 deputati
montenegrini del partito socialista popolare (Snp),
finora alleati di Milosevic ma che mostrano segni di ripensamento. Se si schiereranno
con i deputati l'Opposizione democratica serba (Dos), Kostunica avra' la
maggioranza, altrimenti la manterra' la coalizione guidata da Milosevic.
Secondo la costituzione, il parlamento ha il diritto di nominare e destituire i
ministri e di ratificare o meno il premier designato dal presidente. Il presidente ha
il diritto, se non riesce a formare un governo, di sciogliere le camere e di indire nuove
elezioni entro 90 giorni. Il controllo delle forze armate e' del Consiglio supremo di
difesa di cui il capo dello stato e' presidente ma dal cui parere questi non
puo' prescindere. La politica economica e sociale e la politica estera sono prerogativa
del governo.
Il parlamento federale e' composto di due camere: camera alta con 40 membri (20
serbi e 20 montenegrini) e camera bassa con 138 deputati, 30 montenegrini e 108
serbi. (ANSA)
OT-PAN
08/10/2000 20:22
===
Bollettino di controinformazione del
Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'"
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma vengono
fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al solo scopo di
segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only")
Per contributi e segnalazioni: jugocoord@...
*** QUESTO SERVIZIO E' ANCORA IN FASE SPERIMENTALE ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eCircle ti offre una nuova opportunita:
la tua agenda sul web - per te e per i tuoi amici
Organizza on line i tuoi appuntamenti .
E' facile, veloce e gratuito!
Da oggi su
http://www.ecircle.de/ad176952/www.ecircle.it
Subject: Yugoslavia in Crisis section of www.iacenter.org
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 14:43:09 -0400
From: iacenter@...
To: "International" <iacenter@...>
International Action Center
39 West 14th Street, #206
NY, NY 10011
212-633-6646
212-633-2889 fax
iacenter@...
www.iacenter.org
Dear Friends
In light of the grave events in Belgrade Oct. 5, 2000 and
the threat of a complete U.S.-NATO takeover of Yugoslavia,
the International Action Center has decided to set up a new
section on its web site called "Yugoslavia in
Crisis--reports and analyses." Here we will reproduce some
of the reports and analyses from sources independent of the
corporate media, both organizationally and ideologically.
Where possible this will include reports from Yugoslavia
written by honest journalists who have proven themselves
opposed to the NATO bombing campaign and war of 1999.
Yugoslavia in Crisis--reports and analyses
The articles include reports from Michel Collon, author of
two books on the Balkan crisis and a resolute anti-war and
anti-NATO activist; Ruediger Goebel, an editor and
correspondent from the German progressive daily newspaper,
Junge Welt, who was in Yugoslavia during the NATO bombing
campaign writing daily articles, and Tanja Djurovic, a Junge
Welt correspondent from Belgrade. We will also publish IAC
analyses and those from other non-corporate sources.
Where we receive articles not in English, we will include
the original language as well as our English translation.
You can find this material at www.iacenter.org on the home
page under the above title. For your information, we include
some sample reports from the correspondents.
Yours in struggle,
Sara Flounders and John Catalinotto
October 9, 2000
BELGRADE JOURNAL - Friday October 6, 3 p.m.
Michel Collon
The 8 questions of the day
I shall try to answer the 8 questions that sum up the events
:
1. Did the TV show all ?
2. Did we experience a well-prepared coup-d'Etat ?
3. What is the U.S. trying to accomplish in the current
situation ?
4. Did people vote for Kostunica or against Milosevic ?
5. Why did those in power not forsee their electoral setback
?
6. Were the elections truly free and fair ?
7. Are those people who support Kostunica also for the
United States ?
8. What is going to happen ?
1. Did the TV show all ? Nothing to add to the images
presented by BBC and CNN. In effect there was an enormous
crowd, the police put up a very weak resistance and above
all looked for ways to avoid serious confrontations. But
what I didn't see exposed on the Western networks was the
plundering of the headquarters of the Socialist Party (while
Kostunica had announced that there should be no
revenge-taking toward the parties), and the buildings of
various public enterprises. Neither was shown the broken
windows of a certain number of stores in the center, which
were subsequently looted. I personally saw demonstrators
leave center city by the bridge over the Sava, while
carrying on their shoulders stolen computers. In the center
also, those not demonstrating found it deplorable that
people were destroying public property : " We'll have to pay
for it. " But the most important thing is that the
opposition succeeded in bringing out an enormous
mobilization and that those in power were unable to oppose
it with a counter-mobilization.
2. Carefully prepared coup d'Etat ? The demonstrators were
led by some hundreds of very active young people, most of
whom had come from Cacak, Kragujevac and other opposition
strongholds (Belgrade is luke-warm). You could say that they
proceeded methodically to take control of a series of key
places. First of all, the Parliament. Obviously a symbol.
Still one could notice that Mr. Kostunica, always presented
as a convinced legalist and constitutionalist, had taken
over the Parliament at the moment when that Parliament had
just been elected and that the opposition was not
challenging the results of the parliamentary elections. What
does the USA want ? We shall soon see. Next, the television
station RTS. Just like in Romania in 1989 and in each coup
d'Etat, to take over the big media centers and deprive the
enemy of the right of response seems to have become
Objective Number 1. The other media centers and certain
buildings of public enterprises followed.
This systematic and well-planned character of the action
reminded one that the real chief of the opposition, Zoran
Djindjic, had declared several months ago to Greek TV that
if they failed to win the elections, they would take over
parliament. This was nothing new. In 1993 in Moscow, Yeltsin
- backed by the U.S. - had burned down Parliament [the
Russian Duma] and killed a number of deputies that had been
resisting him. Another opposition leader, Mrs. Pesic, had
raised the need to " create a Bucharest syndrome. " These
things were prepared long in advance.
3. Why is the U.S. still pushing for a test of strength ?
Why this attempt at a total confrontation ? Why do they
refuse all negociated compromise that would permit them to
avoid the risk of a bloodbath ? Because they know that the
opposition that they are about to lead to power suffers two
serious weaknesses that could be fatal to it, and without
needed to wait long years for these weaknesses to show. What
are these weaknesses ?
First, the DOS coalition is completely heterogenous.
Nineteen (18 ?) parties that have nothing in common but the
will to take power and a taste for dollars from Washington.
In this coalition you can find people who have fought each
other more or less to the death for years (Djindjic had
pushed out Kostunica and many others), monarchists and
republicans, Serbian nationalists and separatists (from
Sandjak and Vojvodinje) whose programs are diametrically
opposed. Once in office, it is clear they will once again
begin making the gravest splits and conflicts of interests.
It will be absolutely impossible to carry out the programs
of all the parties. The magic of " Unity behind Kostunica "
won't last long.
In addition, and this is the second factor, the DOS will
strongly disillusion its electors. Those voters, financially
and morally exhausted by 10 years of sanctions, desire to "
live normally, " (that's the idea that was most frequently
expressed to me by the demonstrators that I questioned on
October 5), that is to have a standard of living as close as
possible to that of the West. But, as we have already
explained in an earlier article, the opposition's G-17
program forsees the liquidation of social protections and
the public enterprises, massive layoffs and carte blanche
for the multinational corporations to buy the enterprises
they are interested in and to more effectively exploit the
workers. A few people will live better, many will live
worse.
With the result that, sooner or later, Kostunica will
disillusion his supporters and they will give up hope. Will
there be an alternative then ? Could the left parties and
those who defend the independence of the country return to
power (on the condition that they carry out certain
self-examinations, as we will see) as could be the case in
the next elections in three neighboring countries :
Macedonia, the Serb Republic in Bosnia and Romania ? It is
just to avoid this possibility of a legitimate return to
power in the next elections that the U.S. is trying so hard
to break the current governmental apparatus and that of the
left parties in Yugoslavia.
In the last elections in Macedonia, the left candidate was
leading, but violent incidents grew to the point that the
leader of the left finally pulled back for fear of very
violent confrontations. We should point out that U.S. and
other troops occupy this country and there is no doubt their
intervention is aimed at stopping the left. We add that for
the West that claims it is so careful of legality, the
elections in Macedonia were " perfect. "
4. Did people vote for Kostunica or against Milosevic ? The
latter answer is correct according to many people I spoke
with. Despite his 10 years in power, Milosevic had acquired
a great prestige during the war for firmly resisting NATO,
which is what corresponded to the will of all his people.
But the party in power wasted its opportunities by commiting
two major errors.
First, it permitted, even favored the growth of social
inequalities. Yes, sanctions (embargo) are a crime the West
imposed that made the population suffer cruelly. But that
public had also seen certain outrageously large fortunes
grow up under its eyes. It is incorrect to claim, as the
Western media does, that " all the nomenklatura lives in
luxury. " I managed to visit the appartments of certain
mid-level ministry officials - they were just as modest as
those of the neighbors, in the socially constructed
buildings that had nothing of luxury about them.
Nevertheless, there were also scandalous life-styles of
those in business and in trafficking. To hold onto its
support, the regime would have to fight against the interest
of those with large fortunes and devote more effort to
social services to aid the poorest people.
In addition, the communication strategy of the leadership as
well as the public media had not proven fruitful. A number
of jokes circulated about RTS television and messages from
the top leadership had lost their credibility when it was
constantly repeated that all was going well.
5. Why didn't Milosevic see it coming ? How could it be that
Milosevic had decided to call these early elections himself
? And that, up to the last minute, the parties in power
showed themselves sure of winning, so much so that they were
taken completely aback when they had to " manage " their
defeat ?
A certain bureaucratism is involved in the answer. You can
find among the officials and functionaries many very devoted
people, full of enthusiasm to defend their country. You also
find a certain number of bureaucrats who never tire of
looking for solutions to problems. And one has the very
clear impression that the reports that they send to the "
top " are of the sort : " All is very well, your grace. "
Those in power had not taken into consideration that they
had lost a great part of the popularity they had during the
war. They believed that the elections were in their pocket.
And their campaign strategy was not good : Milosevic absent,
the self-satisfied discourses on reconstrution that is real,
but also negating the social problem and a systematic
message of the sort that " all will be very well " that had
lost its credibility.
6. Were the elections truly free and fair ? Of course,
this attempt at an analysis of the weaknesses of the parties
in office removes nothing from what we have already shown.
Yes, the elections were not at all free and fair. When you
bombard a people, destroy their factories, their electricity
and heating plants, their roads and their bridges, when you
throw horrible weapons like fragmentation bombs and depleted
uranium at them, when you submit the population to a
disgusting extortion - " Vote for the pro-West parties or
you will continue to starve " -- when you spread hundreds of
millions of dollars to aid certain political parties to
deceive the people with the help of advisers specialized in
scientific methods of organizing campaigns based on lies,
they one has to conclude that if these elections are as free
and fair, then Jamie Shea [spokesperson for NATO during the
bombing campaign] is a sincere and objective person.
7. Are those people who support Kostunica also for the
United States ? A argued with Kostunica's supports. It was
instructive. Since the opposition parties are financed -
grossly - by Washington, one could believe that Kostunica's
supporters were also partial to the United States.
False. A proverb that the Serbs apply to themselves with a
sort of self-mocking, points this out : " If you have two
Serbs, you will have three opinions. " Many demonstrators
spontaneously told me " We are not NATO. " A hairdresser of
French origin, having recognized me in the street (following
my television appearances), came spontaneously to let me
know that he greatly appreciated my criticisms against NATO,
but that I had been wrong to put the opposition parties in
the same bag. " We here detest the Americans, we know very
well what they are and what their interests are. "
" But we want no more of Milosevic. We want to live normally
without sanctions and like you others in the West. " Like
the unemployed and those on welfare in the West or like the
rich of the West ? Doesn't he realize that the Western
multinational corporations will not bring prosperity here
but a harsher exploitation ? No, this type of talk, for the
moment, they don't want to hear : " You could be right, but
we have to try it, we want change, change ! And if these new
leaders don't keep their promises, we will change again ! "
That though is a grand illusion, to believe that NATO will
permit a " step back. " But that is the current mood.
Another element to take notice of is that the DOS election
campaign strategy succeeded in promoting a strange but
effective idea : Milosevic was in fact a tool of the United
States - he served them and helped maintain their influence.
That idea doesn't hold up - why would the U.S. do everything
it could to eliminate the one that served them so well - but
certain people bought it anyway. Indeed, it was a classic
method of advertising : those who steal, cry " Stop, thief.
" Those who are paid by the [north] Americans, seem to by
crying " Down with the United States ! "
8. Que va-t-il se passer? Cette apres-midi, une vie plus ou
moins normale a repris dans les rues, encore que les
commerces restent fermes. Mais l'opposition veut maintenir
ses troupes dans le centre, pour eviter toute intervention
policiere de reprise en mains. Elle annonce une mobilisation
plus importante encore.
D'une part, l'opposition DOS cherche a conclure une alliance
au parlement en faisant eclater le parti montenegrin de
Bulatovic et en y trouvant les voix qui leur manquent pour
acquerir la majorite. On peut etre certain que les dollars
de Washington servent d'appat. De l'autre cote, le
gouvernement cherche la parade sans l'avoir trouve. Il
affirme ne pas vouloir lancer l'armée pour eviter un bain de
sang, il demande que la légalité soit respectee. Il
s'efforce de retrouver un média qui lui permette de faire
passer son message. Mais sa stratégie de communication
s'avere toujours aussi lente et chaotique. On attend en vain
une prise de position officielle. Ilosevic pourrait
prononcer un discours... On attend. A bientot!
8. What will happen ? This afternoon [Oct. 6], a
more-or-less normal life returned to the streets, although
the shops remained closed. But the opposition wants to keep
its troops in the center to avoid all possible police
intervention to retake it. It announced an even larger
mobilization. On the one hand, the DOS opposition is
looking to conclude a parliamentary alliance by splitting up
Bulatovic's Montenegrin party and finding there teh votes
that they lack to obtain a majority. One can be certain that
Washington's dollars will serve as bait. On the other hand,
the government is looking for a path of action without
finding it. It affirms it doesn't want to call out the army
because it wants to avoid a bloodbath, and demands that
legality be respected. It tries to find a media that will
allow it to spread its message. But its strategy of
communication is still slow and chaotic. One waits in vain
for an official position. Milosevic could be making a speech
… one waits. Soon.
NATO is getting ready to pick up the harvest. By Tanja
Djurovic, Belgrade
"I've just received information from official sources that
Vojislav Kostunica won the elections. I congratulate Mr.
Kostunica on his election victory...", said recent Yugoslav
president Slobodan Milosevic in his address to the nation
broadcast on Yu-Info TV channel on Friday (Oct. 6),
admitting defeat in the presidential elections by his
opponent Vojislav Kostunica, candidate of Democratic
opposition of Serbia (DOS).
"I personally intend to take a short break, to spend more
time with my family, and then, afterwards, to primarily
strengthen my party...Socialist party of Serbia will be a
very strong opposition" finished Milosevic his address
making it clear that he has no intention of fleeing the
country, or leaving political life.
This seems to be the epilogue of election crisis in
Yugoslavia and two-week long fight between Milosevic and
Kostunica for presidency of FRY, which culminated on
Thursday in Belgrade with mass and violent protests
orchestrated by DOS.
Vojislav Kostunica made his oath on Saturday night in
Belgrade "Sava Center", by which he officially became new
president of Yugoslavia. On the joint constitutive sessions
of both chambers of Federal Parliament, Kostunica bounded
himself to "respect and implement the Constitution of FRY
and federal laws, to preserve the sovereignty, independence
and integrity of FRY..."
Earlier in the night, both chambers of the Yugoslav
Parliament were constituted for the new session. The Chamber
of Citizens verified 119 out of 138 deputy mandates, and
Chamber of Republics 39 out of 40 mandates.
In both chambers of the Federal Parliament the
representatives of Milosevic's left coalition have the
majority. This was clear from the start, and even DOS
representatives agreed to it.
Still, Milosevic's obvious presence in Yugoslav capital and
appearance on TV, putting the end to rumors and wild guesses
as to his whereabouts and intentions, came as a shock to DOS
leaders and their supporters, who had been convinced that
ex-Yugoslav president had long since left Belgrade, if not
indeed the country. That, coupled with the fact that a
leftist government might be formed soon, is casting a shadow
on DOS's present advantage.
Zoran Djindjic, DOS campaign manager, gave a statement to
the press immediately after Milosevic's address on Friday,
saying that Slobodan Milosevic is just preparing a blow from
the back and intends to consolidate the police forces, so he
could come back on scene as a tough hand. Obviously afraid
that someone or something can still endanger their
"democratic revolution", Djindjic finished rather
paranoically: "I do not trust Milosevic!"
Still, if Milosevic is not to be trusted, why not accept the
assurances and congratulations offered to Kostunica by
thehighest representatives of the army and police? It seems
that DOS's fear of one man and his presence is so great,
that not even the fact that those institutions didn't react
during Thursday's vandalistic demonstrations can reassure
the Serbian opposition.
Perhaps the DOS is simply being aware of its own fragility:
from the very beginning, it has been highly dependent on
foreign support and money. This ad hoc alliance of some 18
parties has only one common ground and program - to oust
Milosevic.
Not to forget that the DOS candidate, newly-proclaimed FRY
president Kostunica, is a leader of a small party with low
support from the people, and a man of low significance. The
person running the show for this particular puppet on a
string is Zoran Djindjic, who in his own turn is a puppet of
the administration in Washington.
Not to forget that over 2 million Yugoslav citizens voted
against Kostunica precisely for the above mentioned reasons,
knowing who the powers behind DOS are and not wanting to be
a part of "Pax Americana".
"Slobodan Milosevic had very little or no chance at all"
said Petar Raskov (70), a Federal court judge on pension,
underlining that pressure exercised on Serbia, of power,
money and media combined, was too heavy for Serbian people
not to yield. "Milosevic was the only man to preserve the
FRY resistance to NATO's "Drang nach Osten" (Push to the
East) strategy. I couldn't vote for NATO, not even if it
puts on a disguise of Serbian nationalist with anti-American
policy".
As for those who did - a gun at man's temple can be a good
incentive, and endlessly repeated "international community"
treats to Serbian people that as long as Milosevic is
Yugoslav president, sanctions against their country won't be
lifted, obviously influenced the ultimate decision,
especially with the young people.
"I didn't vote for Kostunica, he is nobody!" says Milan
Ristic (24), a student from Belgrade. "But his victory might
bring better days for Yugoslavia. I voted against Milosevic,
because the whole world was against him!"
Therefore, after plowing Yugoslav land with bombs and
missiles in Spring of 1999, after fertilizing it for over a
year with media-launched lies and money, Military Alliance
of the West is getting ready to pick up the harvest.
END
---
URL for this article is
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/medical.htm
Click here for print-friendly version.
What is Albright Really Promising for the
'New' Yugoslavia?
by Jared Israel (10-8-2000)
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
As Clinton administration officials wax euphoric over their
'democratic' coup d'état in Yugoslavia, we say, "Why not?
What is democracy without a few hundred million dollars in
US bribes plus a mob that sacks the parliament building and
loots paintings, chairs and computers?"
Is this what they meant by 'free elections'?
Accompanying the expressions of euphoria are promises of
Good Things to Come:
"[Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright]...promised assistance from Washington
and its European allies for reconstruction so that
Yugoslavs 'can have the normal life that the rest of
the Balkans are beginning to have.'" ('LA Times',
10-6-2000)
Assistance and a normal life. We will be publishing an
in-depth look at the meaning of this assistance. The plan for
Yugoslavia is a Marshall plan in reverse. Whereas the first
Marshall Plan was a Keynsian affair, pumping money into
local economies, providing cheap credit and so on, this plan
will do the reverse. In essence, Yugoslavia will pay war
reparations to the West. More on that in later articles.
Albright promises to bring Yugoslavia "the normal life that
the rest of the Balkans are beginning to have."
That suggests the ''rest of the Balkans'' was doing badly
before the West took over and now they doing better.
Untrue. The countries the US has 'assisted', particularly
Bulgaria and Albania in the Balkans, along with Ukraine and
the Russian Federation next door, had a decent standard of
living before the West imposed 'structural adjustment' plans.
These plans have caused economic and social devastation.
And conditions are getting worse.
Albania has in essence no functioning economy. If it weren't
for the 1/3 of the labor force that works outside the country,
mainly in Italy and Greece, and the money these people remit
back to their families, there would be no economy at all.
(Albanian economic figures are manipulated to give the false
impression of economic improvement. In reality there is
almost no economic activity.) Bulgarian industry and social
life have been destroyed. Bulgaria and Russia have falling
populations.
Radio Free Europe had a story recently that
ONLY 30 PERCENT OF RUSSIAN BIRTHS
ARE 'NORMAL.
'The Russian Academy of Medical Sciences told
AP on 5 October that the number of normal births
in the Russian Federation declined from 45.3
percent in 1992 [after International Monetary
Fund 'reforms' were first instituted, which
destroyed the Russian social safety net] to just 30
percent in 1999. (RFRFE/RL Newsline, 10/6/00)
The story goes on to blame this terrible statistic mainly on
personal problems - excessive drinking and the like. It is true
enough that many people in economically devastated
countries develop extreme personal problems. But it is
important to understand the cause: the International
Monetary Fund ordered the Russia government to institute
extreme social spending cuts, and these cuts shattered the
medical system. At the same time, wages were pushed down
to as little as $2 a month. People who don't eat properly and
regularly don't have healthy pregnancies, do they?
****
If you find emperors-clothes useful, we can
use your help...
(The Soros Foundation does NOT fund Emperors
Clothes.)
We rely on volunteer labor and donations. Our expenses
include: Internet fees, Lexis, our Internet research tool,
and phone bills. We use the phone a lot for interviews and
to discuss editorial changes.
Every month hundreds of thousands of people read
articles from Emperor's Clothes. By making a
contribution you will be helping to spread the word.
To use our secure server to make a donation please go to
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/howyour.htm . Or you
can mail a check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321,
Newton, MA 02461-0321. (USA)
Thanks for reading and thanks for helping!
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
---
The url for this article is
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/everybody's.htm
Did any major power NOT fund the Kostunica campaign?
"For Germans it was 'an obligation based on history.' to back the push
for
democracy [said Fischer.]...
''Der Spiegel also reported that Fischer, U.S. Secretary of State
Madeleine
Albright and some G-8 foreign ministers brought the Yugoslav opposition
together in Berlin on December 17.
'''We read the riot act to the opposition then and told them to get
their
act together,'' it quoted one participant as saying.'' [From article
below]
[Note: If you are familiar with Germany's history in the Balkans
Fischer's
remark is chilling. Our thanks to Professor of Linguistics Peter Maher
for
sending in this story.]
BERLIN, Oct 7 (Reuters) - Germany said on Saturday it had supported the
Yugoslav opposition with millions of marks in financial aid.
Norway also said it had helped fund the Yugoslav opposition's election
campaign, which led to victory by opposition candidate Vojislav
Kostunica
and soon afterwards to the overthrow of strongman President Slobodan
Milosevic.
German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer said in a magazine interview
that
Germany had been duty bound to provide financial support to Slobodan
Milosevic's opponents.
``It could have all ended up being far bloodier,'' Fischer told Der
Spiegel. For Germans it was ``an obligation based on history'' to back
the
push for democracy, he added.
Der Spiegel said around $30 million, mostly from the United States, was
channelled through an office in Budapest.
Another 45 million marks ($20 million) from Germany and other Western
states went to cities that were under opposition control. Der Spiegel
said
the Foreign Ministry sent around 17 million marks through 16 German
towns,
which also contributed.
A spokeswoman for the Foreign Ministry confirmed the figures. ``It was
not
disguised but rather it was entirely normal financial aid from the
budget,'' she said.
She said four million marks in media support went to Yugoslavia. She
declined to identify which media outlets channelled the money, but Der
Spiegel said state broadcasters ZDF and Bayerischer Rundfunk were used.
No
one from either broadcaster was available for comment.
Der Spiegel also reported that Fischer, U.S. Secretary of State
Madeleine
Albright and some G-8 foreign ministers brought the Yugoslav opposition
together in Berlin on December 17.
``We read the riot act to the opposition then and told them to get their
act together,'' it quoted one participant as saying.
Most of the opposition, long divided by infighting and personality
clashes,
united behind Kostunica in last month's presidential election that
ultimately ended Milosevic's rule.
Germany urged the European Union on Friday to offer immediate assistance
to
the new government in Belgrade. Economics Minister Werner Mueller
promised
in an interview with Bild am Sonntag newspaper to be published on Sunday
that Yugoslavia would receive ``immediate aid'' from the EU.
NORWAY ALSO SAYS HELPED OPPOSITION
In Oslo, Foreign Ministry spokesman Victor Roenneberg told Reuters the
government had given ``several million crowns'' in financial aid to
Yugoslavia and provided supplies ranging from computer and
communications
equipment for the opposition's vote count to oil to
opposition-controlled
villages.
Norway also funded opposition-run newspapers, radio stations and
Internet
media, he said.
``It is highly unusual to fund one party against another, but because we
had assisted the opposition throughout the election, we were quite
convinced that the opposition had a clear majority from the beginning,''
Roenneberg said.
Norwegian Foreign Minister Thorbjoern Jagland arrived in Belgrade early
on
Saturday and met with Kostunica, who was to be sworn in at a ceremony
later
in the day.
``Norwegian diplomacy manages to do things even though it works
quietly,''
Jagland told national news agency NTB.
Norway has also said it will concentrate more of its foreign aid on
Yugoslavia.
(c) Reuters 2000. Reposted for fair use only.
www.tenc.net [Emperor's Clothes]
********************************************************
DON'T BE FOOLED BY POSTURING O YUGO COUP "GOVERNMENT"
Dear people,
In a message posted earlier there is a quote from the British
'Independent'
which reads:
<< The new government of Yugoslavia was furious yesterday after
Washington
suggested that sanctions would not be lifted unless Slobodan Milosevic
was
handed over to the War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague. Vladeta Jankovic,
the
number two to the president-elect, Vojislav Kostunica, issued a stark
warning that relations between the new government and the West will not
run as smoothly as had been hoped >>
Bertolt Brecht says: "When the leaders speak of peace the common people
know war is coming." In other words, beware of posturing.
I think it's very important that the peace movement not be fooled by
some
recent posturing on the part of the self-proclaimed "new government" in
Yugoslavia. This is a US-installed regime, not a "new Government" - it
only exists as a government, if indeed it does exist as a government, by
virtue of a fortune in US bribe money, which financed its organizing
efforts, its violence, aimed at denying the recent election and the
endorsement of Western Imperial governments.
The parliamentary election that accompanied the election for the
ceremonial
post of President on Sept. 24, gave a full majority in both houses to
the
coalition the West calls "Milosevich". Milosevich personally leads far
and
away the biggest mass party in the Balkans. This despite the dangling of
massive US government monetary bribes for any leader willing to join the
DOS coalition which supports Kostunica.
Kostunica was 'approved' as President by the Yugoslav Constitutional
Court
in a situation where a mob straight out of Roman history (but even
better
than Rome cause they had cellular phones) had already gutted parliament,
looted everything possible, and had beaten resisting officials. That is,
the Court gave its approval in a very dangerous situation.
Precisely because the Kostunica/Djidjic Coup was NOT approved by a
majority
- between the people who voted against Kostunica and the people who
didn't
vote, the vast majority have never expressed support for him and many of
those who did vote for him certainly did not vote for a coup - precisely
because most people do NOT approve what he has done, he cannot appear to
be
subservient to the US. His position is most fragile. His entire
apparatus
of support is US funded. This is true of the so-called independent
media,
which now has taken control, gangster fashion, of the mass media such as
Politika that was not previously in the peace of the US government.
This
is true of the political parties that comprise the DOS coalition which
is
Kostunica's tenuous (because infested with mutual hostility) base of
support.
Because Kostunica relies on US paid groups and media in a country that
loathes the US government, his position is fragile. The US has
recognized
this and countless articles hint, or even state outright, that US
officials
are trying not to look to supportive. Obviously a little public
squabbling
with the US is useful. But this is for appearance. As someone once
said,
if you want to figure out where political loyalties lie, "Look at the
money, stupid." And the bribe money comes from Uncle Sugar.
Perhaps the socialist party or other anti-DOS groups needed to make the
best of a bad situation. Perhaps they intelligently avoided a fight
when
the mob ransacked Belgrade because they realized the US was looking for
a
blood bath as an excuse to intervene. Perhaps they handled a very
difficult situation brilliantly. Does that mean we have should be
silence
in the face of a US-paid for coup? If we do not expose the fact that a
NATO proxy force has seized power, or at least partly seized power, if
we
attempt to gloss over the hard reality, that US government overt and
covert
agencies organized and financed a coup in Yugoslavia - if we do not
tell
the truth about these things we would become the pets of the Empire: Yap
yap, cute doggy; don't worry, he doesn't bite. We would fail in our most
important task: to help the people in our countries understand the
Imperial
hand behind these events.
Peace activist Marjaleena Repo and Canadian Professor Kitsikis (the
latter
specializes in electoral practices in the Balkans) interviewed Vladeta
Jankovic, the man quoted by the "independent' above. This was at the
time
of the Sept 24 Yugoslav elections. Jankovic endorsed the taking of vast
sums of US
money. Jankovic justified it by saying "we really need it badly" - an
argument that can be used to justify any crime. Indeed. Prof. Kitsikis
responded that this was high treason. Jankovic had no answer.
Isn't it a bit late for Mr. Jankovic to posture about his virginity?
Jared Israel
For more on these questions please see www.tenc.net [Emperor's Clothes]
******************************************************
>From Milosevic to the Future
>From the standpoint of cameras and Western journalists, the fall of
Milosevic appears indistinguishable from other velvet and near-velvet
revolutions that have toppled dictators from Prague to Manila. A
righteous
outpouring of people into the streets, a ham-handed, venal government
capitulates and a new day is born.
But it is never as simple as breathless broadcasts might paint it. To
understand the fall of Slobodan Milosevic, it is important to understand
the manner in which he fell. The truth in Yugoslavia lies somewhere
between
the grand aesthetic of the public drama and the more mundane details of
deal making. Indeed, the latter is frequently more defining than the
former. And many disappointed expectations are rooted in details
overlooked
by revolution's glamour.
The roots of Milosevic's demise can be traced to the frustration of the
American and British governments, enmeshed in the realities of
peacekeeping
in Kosovo, with no hope of conclusion. NATO was trapped in a quagmire
without exit. In Belgrade, the opposition failed, divided, and were
discredited as agents of NATO, all against a backdrop of Serb
victimization.
Everyday Serbs were convinced of two things: They had not committed
atrocities, and they themselves were the targets of an unjust bombing
campaign. Milosevic was the great beneficiary. He might have been a
swine,
but he was Serbia's swine. Incompetent on many fronts, he at least
defended
the national interest. In this context, the opposition had as much
chance
of winning as Quisling had of carrying Norway in World War II.
The United States reacted with a new strategy. Described in "Toppling
Milosevic: The Carrot Instead of the Stick," the new strategy consisted
of
splitting Milosevic from his followers. Cracks opened but were contained
when Milosevic called for elections. But before the election it became
clear Milosevic had
nearly trapped himself, as recounted in "Checkmate in Yugoslavia,".
Milosevic's Cabinet, his cronies and the army and police held the key to
the drama. Milosevic had to be isolated from those levers of power
before
the crowds could storm parliament. Thousands could have been killed, as
they were in Romania with the fall of Ceaucescu. Milosevic might cling
to
power.
It was imperative the leadership split from Milosevic and accommodate
Kostunica. Public displays of police suddenly embracing demonstrators
probably had less to do with the passions of the moment than with
fevered
deals being made between Kostunica and former Milosevic followers. These
deals brought both the peace and the revolution.
The deals also created a revolution with a complex genesis and an
uncertain
future. Milosevic is certainly gone. The temptation among many,
including
his closest followers, is to blame everything on him. The head of the
international war crimes tribunal in the Hague has made it clear
Milosevic
should be tried for war crimes, but Kostunica has made it clear he does
not
want to see prosecution proceed.
As president, he might be able to stomach Milosevic's trial, but many of
the people he and the United States had to deal with over the past few
months are also subject to indictment and trial. They would not have
been
as cooperative had Kostunica and likely the United States not made
guarantees about their legal status. Given the example of former
President
Augusto Pinochet of Chile, it seems probable that any world-wise
operators
asked for promises.
As important as the status of charges against Milosevic followers, is
the
issue of Serbian territorial claims, particularly in Kosovo. Kostunica
was
an adamant supporter of Serbian claims in Kosovo. What did the United
States promise Kostunica? Indeed, how long can Kostunica survive without
some movement on Kosovo? And what will Albanians do about the new
darling
of the West?
Kostunica himself remains an enigma. The West would like to turn him
into
another Vaclav Havel. He is not a communist, but he is not a liberal
either. He is a nationalist who, like the rest of Serbia, has viewed the
West with suspicion. He has also created a coalition of diverse
elements,
including former Milosevic supporters who hope to retain their
influence,
if not their position.
It is reasonable to say Kostunica is a snapshot of Serbia today: tired
of
Milosevic, deeply suspicious and resentful of the West, nationalistic to
the very bone. Kostunica is formally democratic, but he understands the
complex personalism and clannishness that comprise Balkan culture. No
Havel, Kostunica is a hardline
nationalist who has come to power partly by accommodating his public
enemies.
The fall of Milosevic gives the West the opportunity to wash its hands
of
the mess. But trying to wash hands and actually washing them are
different
things. The West now finds itself in a position in which it must support
a
political figure financially and politically. The problem is that
political
figure has certain interests that will likely be anathema. If the West
does
not support him, it loses credibility. If it does, it can wind up
supporting the very perspectives that helped lead to war in the first
place.
This is what the ethnic Albanians in Kosovo will fear most. They see
Kostunica as the West's excuse to abandon the Albanians to the Serbs
once
again. And, indeed, that might be the case. Washington, weary of the
mess,
may well declare victory and go home.
(c) 2000 Stratfor, Inc.
***************************************************************
DJINDJIC: FUTURE STATE WILL BE UNION OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
ZAGREB, October 7 (Tanjug) - The future state will not be Yugoslavia
but a
union of Serbia and Montenegro with a common foreign policy, defense and
currency, Democratic Opposition of Serbia (DOS) election headquarters
chief
Zoran Djindjic said for the Zagreb daily Jutarnji list on Saturday.
Everything else will be separate, he said, adding that a common
parliament, government and president were "unnecessary."
Asked if he would agree to a secession of Montenegro, Djindjic said
this
republic could be as independent as it wished, and that, if the majority
people agreed to secession, "that is not an issue at all."
The situation with Kosovo and Metohija province is different "because
that
region is seen by people as a cradle of the Serb being," Djindjic said.
"Our monasteries, our history" are there, he said.
"In Kosovo at first we want to be present in resolving problems and
realizing international decisions through a new ministry in Pristina
which
would settle problems in the field. Anything else would be an illusion.
Integration is not realistic," he said.
Djindjic said the main issue in future contacts with Croatia would be
the
problem of refugees, and that relations would become harmonious once
this
was settled. He said he believed there was no more hatred for Croatia in
Serbia.
---
Why Germany is in a hurry to help
GERMANY DISBURSES A MILLION EUROS FOR CLEARING DANUBE IN YUGOSLAVIA
BERLIN, October 8 (Tanjug) - Germany paid on Friday the first
instalment
out of one million euros (1.95 million German marks) pledged for
clearing
the River Danube through Yugoslavia, according to a foreign ministry
spokesman in Berlin on Saturday.
The payment of 500,000 euros (977,500 G-marks), spokesman Andreas
Michaelis said, was made into an international fund for clearing the
Danube, an important European traffic artery that NATO's bombs closed to
navigation last year.
This makes Germany the first donor actually to make a payment to the
Fund,
Michaelis said, adding that Germany was giving the first clear signal of
support for a democratic Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, both
bilaterally
and as a member of the European Union.
He explained that the campaign for clearing the Danube of the debris of
war had long been planned, but could not be implemented because of
frequent
disagreements with the Yugoslav side.
He went on to say that the problem was expected to be cleared up soon
with
the inauguration of Yugoslavia's new President Vojislav Kostunica.
**********************************************
Albright Says Priority Is to Help Kostunica
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States said on Sunday that its
priority
in Yugoslavia was to help President Vojislav Kostunica by lifting
economic
sanctions and giving the people of Yugoslavia a democracy dividend.
Accountability for defeated Yugoslav leader and indicted war criminal
Slobodan Milosevic (news - web sites) will come ``ultimately'' as
Yugoslavia becomes part of a democratic Europe, Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright said on NBC's ``Meet the Press'' program.
Kostunica took the oath of office on Saturday, one day after Milosevic
conceded defeat in presidential elections held on Sept. 24. He has said
he
opposes extraditing Milosevic to face trial on war crimes charges in The
Hague.
Albright said she was confident that Yugoslavs would eventually come
round
to the view that Milosevic should face trial.
``They will get behind this, believe me, when they figure out that they
are free and democratic and that they will be a part of a real Europe,''
she said.
But she added: ``We have to show the Serb people that they did the
right
thing by going out to vote. They need to have some dividends out of
democracy.
``I have no doubt that there will be accountability and Yugoslavia will
not be truly free until that happens. We have to give President
Kostunica
now a chance. Let's help him. The people of Serbia have voted for him.
Let's help him.''
``We want to support him, we want to get assistance to him. I've been
talking to our European partners. We will be lifting certain economic
sanctions to make sure that the people can recover and the Danube is
cleared,'' she added.
Portions of the Danube River in Yugoslavia are closed to traffic
because
of bridges wrecked by NATO (news - web sites)'s bombing campaign last
year.
The European Union is expected on Monday to lift a ban on oil sales and
flights to Yugoslavia. A freeze on the assets of former leaders will
stay.
Pressed on whether extradition of Milosevic was a condition for an end
to
sanctions, Albright noted there was no time limit on prosecutions for
war
crimes for Milosevic and other indicted Serbs, such as Bosnian Serb
political leader Radovan Karadzic and his military chief Ratko Mladic.
``It doesn't run out. ... The United States has insisted and, believe
me,
their time will come,'' she said.
Albright also made a rare foray into domestic politics, backing Vice
President Al Gore (news - web sites), a fellow Democrat, against Texas
Governor George Bush on Balkan policy.
In the first presidential debate on Tuesday, the Republican Bush called
for a bigger Russian role in pushing Milosevic to leave power, a
position
Gore opposed on the grounds that the Russians had not yet recognized
Kostunica as winner.
Albright criticized the Russians for their delay in deciding that
Milosevic had lost.
``Frankly they were late. It took them a little while to assess the
reality there but ultimately, in recognizing President Kostunica they
have
done the right thing.
``We did not want the Russians to mediate, and Vice President Gore made
that quite clear. ... The way the vice president described it was right.
They did not play the role that they needed to at the right time,'' she
said.
*********************************************************
DINKIC: RATE OF EXCHANGE HALVED FOR D-MARK
BELGRADE, October 8 (Tanjug) - G 17 PLUS Executive Director Mladjan
Dinkic
said on Sunday that the new authorities have taken control over the
Foreign
Currency Department and the Payment Operations Service of the National
Bank
of Yugoslavia.
Consequently, the black-market rate of exchange for the D-mark has been
halved and the going rate is now 22 dinars, instead of 40 of two days
ago,
Dinkic said.
The new authorities prevented the withdrawal of some 50 million D-marks
from an account at the National Bank on Friday, even though the
withdrawal
slip had been based on a legitimate decision of the federal government,
Dinkic said, explaining that this action had been carried out in the
interest of the people.
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 14:43:09 -0400
From: iacenter@...
To: "International" <iacenter@...>
International Action Center
39 West 14th Street, #206
NY, NY 10011
212-633-6646
212-633-2889 fax
iacenter@...
www.iacenter.org
Dear Friends
In light of the grave events in Belgrade Oct. 5, 2000 and
the threat of a complete U.S.-NATO takeover of Yugoslavia,
the International Action Center has decided to set up a new
section on its web site called "Yugoslavia in
Crisis--reports and analyses." Here we will reproduce some
of the reports and analyses from sources independent of the
corporate media, both organizationally and ideologically.
Where possible this will include reports from Yugoslavia
written by honest journalists who have proven themselves
opposed to the NATO bombing campaign and war of 1999.
Yugoslavia in Crisis--reports and analyses
The articles include reports from Michel Collon, author of
two books on the Balkan crisis and a resolute anti-war and
anti-NATO activist; Ruediger Goebel, an editor and
correspondent from the German progressive daily newspaper,
Junge Welt, who was in Yugoslavia during the NATO bombing
campaign writing daily articles, and Tanja Djurovic, a Junge
Welt correspondent from Belgrade. We will also publish IAC
analyses and those from other non-corporate sources.
Where we receive articles not in English, we will include
the original language as well as our English translation.
You can find this material at www.iacenter.org on the home
page under the above title. For your information, we include
some sample reports from the correspondents.
Yours in struggle,
Sara Flounders and John Catalinotto
October 9, 2000
BELGRADE JOURNAL - Friday October 6, 3 p.m.
Michel Collon
The 8 questions of the day
I shall try to answer the 8 questions that sum up the events
:
1. Did the TV show all ?
2. Did we experience a well-prepared coup-d'Etat ?
3. What is the U.S. trying to accomplish in the current
situation ?
4. Did people vote for Kostunica or against Milosevic ?
5. Why did those in power not forsee their electoral setback
?
6. Were the elections truly free and fair ?
7. Are those people who support Kostunica also for the
United States ?
8. What is going to happen ?
1. Did the TV show all ? Nothing to add to the images
presented by BBC and CNN. In effect there was an enormous
crowd, the police put up a very weak resistance and above
all looked for ways to avoid serious confrontations. But
what I didn't see exposed on the Western networks was the
plundering of the headquarters of the Socialist Party (while
Kostunica had announced that there should be no
revenge-taking toward the parties), and the buildings of
various public enterprises. Neither was shown the broken
windows of a certain number of stores in the center, which
were subsequently looted. I personally saw demonstrators
leave center city by the bridge over the Sava, while
carrying on their shoulders stolen computers. In the center
also, those not demonstrating found it deplorable that
people were destroying public property : " We'll have to pay
for it. " But the most important thing is that the
opposition succeeded in bringing out an enormous
mobilization and that those in power were unable to oppose
it with a counter-mobilization.
2. Carefully prepared coup d'Etat ? The demonstrators were
led by some hundreds of very active young people, most of
whom had come from Cacak, Kragujevac and other opposition
strongholds (Belgrade is luke-warm). You could say that they
proceeded methodically to take control of a series of key
places. First of all, the Parliament. Obviously a symbol.
Still one could notice that Mr. Kostunica, always presented
as a convinced legalist and constitutionalist, had taken
over the Parliament at the moment when that Parliament had
just been elected and that the opposition was not
challenging the results of the parliamentary elections. What
does the USA want ? We shall soon see. Next, the television
station RTS. Just like in Romania in 1989 and in each coup
d'Etat, to take over the big media centers and deprive the
enemy of the right of response seems to have become
Objective Number 1. The other media centers and certain
buildings of public enterprises followed.
This systematic and well-planned character of the action
reminded one that the real chief of the opposition, Zoran
Djindjic, had declared several months ago to Greek TV that
if they failed to win the elections, they would take over
parliament. This was nothing new. In 1993 in Moscow, Yeltsin
- backed by the U.S. - had burned down Parliament [the
Russian Duma] and killed a number of deputies that had been
resisting him. Another opposition leader, Mrs. Pesic, had
raised the need to " create a Bucharest syndrome. " These
things were prepared long in advance.
3. Why is the U.S. still pushing for a test of strength ?
Why this attempt at a total confrontation ? Why do they
refuse all negociated compromise that would permit them to
avoid the risk of a bloodbath ? Because they know that the
opposition that they are about to lead to power suffers two
serious weaknesses that could be fatal to it, and without
needed to wait long years for these weaknesses to show. What
are these weaknesses ?
First, the DOS coalition is completely heterogenous.
Nineteen (18 ?) parties that have nothing in common but the
will to take power and a taste for dollars from Washington.
In this coalition you can find people who have fought each
other more or less to the death for years (Djindjic had
pushed out Kostunica and many others), monarchists and
republicans, Serbian nationalists and separatists (from
Sandjak and Vojvodinje) whose programs are diametrically
opposed. Once in office, it is clear they will once again
begin making the gravest splits and conflicts of interests.
It will be absolutely impossible to carry out the programs
of all the parties. The magic of " Unity behind Kostunica "
won't last long.
In addition, and this is the second factor, the DOS will
strongly disillusion its electors. Those voters, financially
and morally exhausted by 10 years of sanctions, desire to "
live normally, " (that's the idea that was most frequently
expressed to me by the demonstrators that I questioned on
October 5), that is to have a standard of living as close as
possible to that of the West. But, as we have already
explained in an earlier article, the opposition's G-17
program forsees the liquidation of social protections and
the public enterprises, massive layoffs and carte blanche
for the multinational corporations to buy the enterprises
they are interested in and to more effectively exploit the
workers. A few people will live better, many will live
worse.
With the result that, sooner or later, Kostunica will
disillusion his supporters and they will give up hope. Will
there be an alternative then ? Could the left parties and
those who defend the independence of the country return to
power (on the condition that they carry out certain
self-examinations, as we will see) as could be the case in
the next elections in three neighboring countries :
Macedonia, the Serb Republic in Bosnia and Romania ? It is
just to avoid this possibility of a legitimate return to
power in the next elections that the U.S. is trying so hard
to break the current governmental apparatus and that of the
left parties in Yugoslavia.
In the last elections in Macedonia, the left candidate was
leading, but violent incidents grew to the point that the
leader of the left finally pulled back for fear of very
violent confrontations. We should point out that U.S. and
other troops occupy this country and there is no doubt their
intervention is aimed at stopping the left. We add that for
the West that claims it is so careful of legality, the
elections in Macedonia were " perfect. "
4. Did people vote for Kostunica or against Milosevic ? The
latter answer is correct according to many people I spoke
with. Despite his 10 years in power, Milosevic had acquired
a great prestige during the war for firmly resisting NATO,
which is what corresponded to the will of all his people.
But the party in power wasted its opportunities by commiting
two major errors.
First, it permitted, even favored the growth of social
inequalities. Yes, sanctions (embargo) are a crime the West
imposed that made the population suffer cruelly. But that
public had also seen certain outrageously large fortunes
grow up under its eyes. It is incorrect to claim, as the
Western media does, that " all the nomenklatura lives in
luxury. " I managed to visit the appartments of certain
mid-level ministry officials - they were just as modest as
those of the neighbors, in the socially constructed
buildings that had nothing of luxury about them.
Nevertheless, there were also scandalous life-styles of
those in business and in trafficking. To hold onto its
support, the regime would have to fight against the interest
of those with large fortunes and devote more effort to
social services to aid the poorest people.
In addition, the communication strategy of the leadership as
well as the public media had not proven fruitful. A number
of jokes circulated about RTS television and messages from
the top leadership had lost their credibility when it was
constantly repeated that all was going well.
5. Why didn't Milosevic see it coming ? How could it be that
Milosevic had decided to call these early elections himself
? And that, up to the last minute, the parties in power
showed themselves sure of winning, so much so that they were
taken completely aback when they had to " manage " their
defeat ?
A certain bureaucratism is involved in the answer. You can
find among the officials and functionaries many very devoted
people, full of enthusiasm to defend their country. You also
find a certain number of bureaucrats who never tire of
looking for solutions to problems. And one has the very
clear impression that the reports that they send to the "
top " are of the sort : " All is very well, your grace. "
Those in power had not taken into consideration that they
had lost a great part of the popularity they had during the
war. They believed that the elections were in their pocket.
And their campaign strategy was not good : Milosevic absent,
the self-satisfied discourses on reconstrution that is real,
but also negating the social problem and a systematic
message of the sort that " all will be very well " that had
lost its credibility.
6. Were the elections truly free and fair ? Of course,
this attempt at an analysis of the weaknesses of the parties
in office removes nothing from what we have already shown.
Yes, the elections were not at all free and fair. When you
bombard a people, destroy their factories, their electricity
and heating plants, their roads and their bridges, when you
throw horrible weapons like fragmentation bombs and depleted
uranium at them, when you submit the population to a
disgusting extortion - " Vote for the pro-West parties or
you will continue to starve " -- when you spread hundreds of
millions of dollars to aid certain political parties to
deceive the people with the help of advisers specialized in
scientific methods of organizing campaigns based on lies,
they one has to conclude that if these elections are as free
and fair, then Jamie Shea [spokesperson for NATO during the
bombing campaign] is a sincere and objective person.
7. Are those people who support Kostunica also for the
United States ? A argued with Kostunica's supports. It was
instructive. Since the opposition parties are financed -
grossly - by Washington, one could believe that Kostunica's
supporters were also partial to the United States.
False. A proverb that the Serbs apply to themselves with a
sort of self-mocking, points this out : " If you have two
Serbs, you will have three opinions. " Many demonstrators
spontaneously told me " We are not NATO. " A hairdresser of
French origin, having recognized me in the street (following
my television appearances), came spontaneously to let me
know that he greatly appreciated my criticisms against NATO,
but that I had been wrong to put the opposition parties in
the same bag. " We here detest the Americans, we know very
well what they are and what their interests are. "
" But we want no more of Milosevic. We want to live normally
without sanctions and like you others in the West. " Like
the unemployed and those on welfare in the West or like the
rich of the West ? Doesn't he realize that the Western
multinational corporations will not bring prosperity here
but a harsher exploitation ? No, this type of talk, for the
moment, they don't want to hear : " You could be right, but
we have to try it, we want change, change ! And if these new
leaders don't keep their promises, we will change again ! "
That though is a grand illusion, to believe that NATO will
permit a " step back. " But that is the current mood.
Another element to take notice of is that the DOS election
campaign strategy succeeded in promoting a strange but
effective idea : Milosevic was in fact a tool of the United
States - he served them and helped maintain their influence.
That idea doesn't hold up - why would the U.S. do everything
it could to eliminate the one that served them so well - but
certain people bought it anyway. Indeed, it was a classic
method of advertising : those who steal, cry " Stop, thief.
" Those who are paid by the [north] Americans, seem to by
crying " Down with the United States ! "
8. Que va-t-il se passer? Cette apres-midi, une vie plus ou
moins normale a repris dans les rues, encore que les
commerces restent fermes. Mais l'opposition veut maintenir
ses troupes dans le centre, pour eviter toute intervention
policiere de reprise en mains. Elle annonce une mobilisation
plus importante encore.
D'une part, l'opposition DOS cherche a conclure une alliance
au parlement en faisant eclater le parti montenegrin de
Bulatovic et en y trouvant les voix qui leur manquent pour
acquerir la majorite. On peut etre certain que les dollars
de Washington servent d'appat. De l'autre cote, le
gouvernement cherche la parade sans l'avoir trouve. Il
affirme ne pas vouloir lancer l'armée pour eviter un bain de
sang, il demande que la légalité soit respectee. Il
s'efforce de retrouver un média qui lui permette de faire
passer son message. Mais sa stratégie de communication
s'avere toujours aussi lente et chaotique. On attend en vain
une prise de position officielle. Ilosevic pourrait
prononcer un discours... On attend. A bientot!
8. What will happen ? This afternoon [Oct. 6], a
more-or-less normal life returned to the streets, although
the shops remained closed. But the opposition wants to keep
its troops in the center to avoid all possible police
intervention to retake it. It announced an even larger
mobilization. On the one hand, the DOS opposition is
looking to conclude a parliamentary alliance by splitting up
Bulatovic's Montenegrin party and finding there teh votes
that they lack to obtain a majority. One can be certain that
Washington's dollars will serve as bait. On the other hand,
the government is looking for a path of action without
finding it. It affirms it doesn't want to call out the army
because it wants to avoid a bloodbath, and demands that
legality be respected. It tries to find a media that will
allow it to spread its message. But its strategy of
communication is still slow and chaotic. One waits in vain
for an official position. Milosevic could be making a speech
… one waits. Soon.
NATO is getting ready to pick up the harvest. By Tanja
Djurovic, Belgrade
"I've just received information from official sources that
Vojislav Kostunica won the elections. I congratulate Mr.
Kostunica on his election victory...", said recent Yugoslav
president Slobodan Milosevic in his address to the nation
broadcast on Yu-Info TV channel on Friday (Oct. 6),
admitting defeat in the presidential elections by his
opponent Vojislav Kostunica, candidate of Democratic
opposition of Serbia (DOS).
"I personally intend to take a short break, to spend more
time with my family, and then, afterwards, to primarily
strengthen my party...Socialist party of Serbia will be a
very strong opposition" finished Milosevic his address
making it clear that he has no intention of fleeing the
country, or leaving political life.
This seems to be the epilogue of election crisis in
Yugoslavia and two-week long fight between Milosevic and
Kostunica for presidency of FRY, which culminated on
Thursday in Belgrade with mass and violent protests
orchestrated by DOS.
Vojislav Kostunica made his oath on Saturday night in
Belgrade "Sava Center", by which he officially became new
president of Yugoslavia. On the joint constitutive sessions
of both chambers of Federal Parliament, Kostunica bounded
himself to "respect and implement the Constitution of FRY
and federal laws, to preserve the sovereignty, independence
and integrity of FRY..."
Earlier in the night, both chambers of the Yugoslav
Parliament were constituted for the new session. The Chamber
of Citizens verified 119 out of 138 deputy mandates, and
Chamber of Republics 39 out of 40 mandates.
In both chambers of the Federal Parliament the
representatives of Milosevic's left coalition have the
majority. This was clear from the start, and even DOS
representatives agreed to it.
Still, Milosevic's obvious presence in Yugoslav capital and
appearance on TV, putting the end to rumors and wild guesses
as to his whereabouts and intentions, came as a shock to DOS
leaders and their supporters, who had been convinced that
ex-Yugoslav president had long since left Belgrade, if not
indeed the country. That, coupled with the fact that a
leftist government might be formed soon, is casting a shadow
on DOS's present advantage.
Zoran Djindjic, DOS campaign manager, gave a statement to
the press immediately after Milosevic's address on Friday,
saying that Slobodan Milosevic is just preparing a blow from
the back and intends to consolidate the police forces, so he
could come back on scene as a tough hand. Obviously afraid
that someone or something can still endanger their
"democratic revolution", Djindjic finished rather
paranoically: "I do not trust Milosevic!"
Still, if Milosevic is not to be trusted, why not accept the
assurances and congratulations offered to Kostunica by
thehighest representatives of the army and police? It seems
that DOS's fear of one man and his presence is so great,
that not even the fact that those institutions didn't react
during Thursday's vandalistic demonstrations can reassure
the Serbian opposition.
Perhaps the DOS is simply being aware of its own fragility:
from the very beginning, it has been highly dependent on
foreign support and money. This ad hoc alliance of some 18
parties has only one common ground and program - to oust
Milosevic.
Not to forget that the DOS candidate, newly-proclaimed FRY
president Kostunica, is a leader of a small party with low
support from the people, and a man of low significance. The
person running the show for this particular puppet on a
string is Zoran Djindjic, who in his own turn is a puppet of
the administration in Washington.
Not to forget that over 2 million Yugoslav citizens voted
against Kostunica precisely for the above mentioned reasons,
knowing who the powers behind DOS are and not wanting to be
a part of "Pax Americana".
"Slobodan Milosevic had very little or no chance at all"
said Petar Raskov (70), a Federal court judge on pension,
underlining that pressure exercised on Serbia, of power,
money and media combined, was too heavy for Serbian people
not to yield. "Milosevic was the only man to preserve the
FRY resistance to NATO's "Drang nach Osten" (Push to the
East) strategy. I couldn't vote for NATO, not even if it
puts on a disguise of Serbian nationalist with anti-American
policy".
As for those who did - a gun at man's temple can be a good
incentive, and endlessly repeated "international community"
treats to Serbian people that as long as Milosevic is
Yugoslav president, sanctions against their country won't be
lifted, obviously influenced the ultimate decision,
especially with the young people.
"I didn't vote for Kostunica, he is nobody!" says Milan
Ristic (24), a student from Belgrade. "But his victory might
bring better days for Yugoslavia. I voted against Milosevic,
because the whole world was against him!"
Therefore, after plowing Yugoslav land with bombs and
missiles in Spring of 1999, after fertilizing it for over a
year with media-launched lies and money, Military Alliance
of the West is getting ready to pick up the harvest.
END
---
URL for this article is
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/medical.htm
Click here for print-friendly version.
What is Albright Really Promising for the
'New' Yugoslavia?
by Jared Israel (10-8-2000)
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
As Clinton administration officials wax euphoric over their
'democratic' coup d'état in Yugoslavia, we say, "Why not?
What is democracy without a few hundred million dollars in
US bribes plus a mob that sacks the parliament building and
loots paintings, chairs and computers?"
Is this what they meant by 'free elections'?
Accompanying the expressions of euphoria are promises of
Good Things to Come:
"[Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright]...promised assistance from Washington
and its European allies for reconstruction so that
Yugoslavs 'can have the normal life that the rest of
the Balkans are beginning to have.'" ('LA Times',
10-6-2000)
Assistance and a normal life. We will be publishing an
in-depth look at the meaning of this assistance. The plan for
Yugoslavia is a Marshall plan in reverse. Whereas the first
Marshall Plan was a Keynsian affair, pumping money into
local economies, providing cheap credit and so on, this plan
will do the reverse. In essence, Yugoslavia will pay war
reparations to the West. More on that in later articles.
Albright promises to bring Yugoslavia "the normal life that
the rest of the Balkans are beginning to have."
That suggests the ''rest of the Balkans'' was doing badly
before the West took over and now they doing better.
Untrue. The countries the US has 'assisted', particularly
Bulgaria and Albania in the Balkans, along with Ukraine and
the Russian Federation next door, had a decent standard of
living before the West imposed 'structural adjustment' plans.
These plans have caused economic and social devastation.
And conditions are getting worse.
Albania has in essence no functioning economy. If it weren't
for the 1/3 of the labor force that works outside the country,
mainly in Italy and Greece, and the money these people remit
back to their families, there would be no economy at all.
(Albanian economic figures are manipulated to give the false
impression of economic improvement. In reality there is
almost no economic activity.) Bulgarian industry and social
life have been destroyed. Bulgaria and Russia have falling
populations.
Radio Free Europe had a story recently that
ONLY 30 PERCENT OF RUSSIAN BIRTHS
ARE 'NORMAL.
'The Russian Academy of Medical Sciences told
AP on 5 October that the number of normal births
in the Russian Federation declined from 45.3
percent in 1992 [after International Monetary
Fund 'reforms' were first instituted, which
destroyed the Russian social safety net] to just 30
percent in 1999. (RFRFE/RL Newsline, 10/6/00)
The story goes on to blame this terrible statistic mainly on
personal problems - excessive drinking and the like. It is true
enough that many people in economically devastated
countries develop extreme personal problems. But it is
important to understand the cause: the International
Monetary Fund ordered the Russia government to institute
extreme social spending cuts, and these cuts shattered the
medical system. At the same time, wages were pushed down
to as little as $2 a month. People who don't eat properly and
regularly don't have healthy pregnancies, do they?
****
If you find emperors-clothes useful, we can
use your help...
(The Soros Foundation does NOT fund Emperors
Clothes.)
We rely on volunteer labor and donations. Our expenses
include: Internet fees, Lexis, our Internet research tool,
and phone bills. We use the phone a lot for interviews and
to discuss editorial changes.
Every month hundreds of thousands of people read
articles from Emperor's Clothes. By making a
contribution you will be helping to spread the word.
To use our secure server to make a donation please go to
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/howyour.htm . Or you
can mail a check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321,
Newton, MA 02461-0321. (USA)
Thanks for reading and thanks for helping!
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
---
The url for this article is
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/everybody's.htm
Did any major power NOT fund the Kostunica campaign?
"For Germans it was 'an obligation based on history.' to back the push
for
democracy [said Fischer.]...
''Der Spiegel also reported that Fischer, U.S. Secretary of State
Madeleine
Albright and some G-8 foreign ministers brought the Yugoslav opposition
together in Berlin on December 17.
'''We read the riot act to the opposition then and told them to get
their
act together,'' it quoted one participant as saying.'' [From article
below]
[Note: If you are familiar with Germany's history in the Balkans
Fischer's
remark is chilling. Our thanks to Professor of Linguistics Peter Maher
for
sending in this story.]
BERLIN, Oct 7 (Reuters) - Germany said on Saturday it had supported the
Yugoslav opposition with millions of marks in financial aid.
Norway also said it had helped fund the Yugoslav opposition's election
campaign, which led to victory by opposition candidate Vojislav
Kostunica
and soon afterwards to the overthrow of strongman President Slobodan
Milosevic.
German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer said in a magazine interview
that
Germany had been duty bound to provide financial support to Slobodan
Milosevic's opponents.
``It could have all ended up being far bloodier,'' Fischer told Der
Spiegel. For Germans it was ``an obligation based on history'' to back
the
push for democracy, he added.
Der Spiegel said around $30 million, mostly from the United States, was
channelled through an office in Budapest.
Another 45 million marks ($20 million) from Germany and other Western
states went to cities that were under opposition control. Der Spiegel
said
the Foreign Ministry sent around 17 million marks through 16 German
towns,
which also contributed.
A spokeswoman for the Foreign Ministry confirmed the figures. ``It was
not
disguised but rather it was entirely normal financial aid from the
budget,'' she said.
She said four million marks in media support went to Yugoslavia. She
declined to identify which media outlets channelled the money, but Der
Spiegel said state broadcasters ZDF and Bayerischer Rundfunk were used.
No
one from either broadcaster was available for comment.
Der Spiegel also reported that Fischer, U.S. Secretary of State
Madeleine
Albright and some G-8 foreign ministers brought the Yugoslav opposition
together in Berlin on December 17.
``We read the riot act to the opposition then and told them to get their
act together,'' it quoted one participant as saying.
Most of the opposition, long divided by infighting and personality
clashes,
united behind Kostunica in last month's presidential election that
ultimately ended Milosevic's rule.
Germany urged the European Union on Friday to offer immediate assistance
to
the new government in Belgrade. Economics Minister Werner Mueller
promised
in an interview with Bild am Sonntag newspaper to be published on Sunday
that Yugoslavia would receive ``immediate aid'' from the EU.
NORWAY ALSO SAYS HELPED OPPOSITION
In Oslo, Foreign Ministry spokesman Victor Roenneberg told Reuters the
government had given ``several million crowns'' in financial aid to
Yugoslavia and provided supplies ranging from computer and
communications
equipment for the opposition's vote count to oil to
opposition-controlled
villages.
Norway also funded opposition-run newspapers, radio stations and
Internet
media, he said.
``It is highly unusual to fund one party against another, but because we
had assisted the opposition throughout the election, we were quite
convinced that the opposition had a clear majority from the beginning,''
Roenneberg said.
Norwegian Foreign Minister Thorbjoern Jagland arrived in Belgrade early
on
Saturday and met with Kostunica, who was to be sworn in at a ceremony
later
in the day.
``Norwegian diplomacy manages to do things even though it works
quietly,''
Jagland told national news agency NTB.
Norway has also said it will concentrate more of its foreign aid on
Yugoslavia.
(c) Reuters 2000. Reposted for fair use only.
www.tenc.net [Emperor's Clothes]
********************************************************
DON'T BE FOOLED BY POSTURING O YUGO COUP "GOVERNMENT"
Dear people,
In a message posted earlier there is a quote from the British
'Independent'
which reads:
<< The new government of Yugoslavia was furious yesterday after
Washington
suggested that sanctions would not be lifted unless Slobodan Milosevic
was
handed over to the War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague. Vladeta Jankovic,
the
number two to the president-elect, Vojislav Kostunica, issued a stark
warning that relations between the new government and the West will not
run as smoothly as had been hoped >>
Bertolt Brecht says: "When the leaders speak of peace the common people
know war is coming." In other words, beware of posturing.
I think it's very important that the peace movement not be fooled by
some
recent posturing on the part of the self-proclaimed "new government" in
Yugoslavia. This is a US-installed regime, not a "new Government" - it
only exists as a government, if indeed it does exist as a government, by
virtue of a fortune in US bribe money, which financed its organizing
efforts, its violence, aimed at denying the recent election and the
endorsement of Western Imperial governments.
The parliamentary election that accompanied the election for the
ceremonial
post of President on Sept. 24, gave a full majority in both houses to
the
coalition the West calls "Milosevich". Milosevich personally leads far
and
away the biggest mass party in the Balkans. This despite the dangling of
massive US government monetary bribes for any leader willing to join the
DOS coalition which supports Kostunica.
Kostunica was 'approved' as President by the Yugoslav Constitutional
Court
in a situation where a mob straight out of Roman history (but even
better
than Rome cause they had cellular phones) had already gutted parliament,
looted everything possible, and had beaten resisting officials. That is,
the Court gave its approval in a very dangerous situation.
Precisely because the Kostunica/Djidjic Coup was NOT approved by a
majority
- between the people who voted against Kostunica and the people who
didn't
vote, the vast majority have never expressed support for him and many of
those who did vote for him certainly did not vote for a coup - precisely
because most people do NOT approve what he has done, he cannot appear to
be
subservient to the US. His position is most fragile. His entire
apparatus
of support is US funded. This is true of the so-called independent
media,
which now has taken control, gangster fashion, of the mass media such as
Politika that was not previously in the peace of the US government.
This
is true of the political parties that comprise the DOS coalition which
is
Kostunica's tenuous (because infested with mutual hostility) base of
support.
Because Kostunica relies on US paid groups and media in a country that
loathes the US government, his position is fragile. The US has
recognized
this and countless articles hint, or even state outright, that US
officials
are trying not to look to supportive. Obviously a little public
squabbling
with the US is useful. But this is for appearance. As someone once
said,
if you want to figure out where political loyalties lie, "Look at the
money, stupid." And the bribe money comes from Uncle Sugar.
Perhaps the socialist party or other anti-DOS groups needed to make the
best of a bad situation. Perhaps they intelligently avoided a fight
when
the mob ransacked Belgrade because they realized the US was looking for
a
blood bath as an excuse to intervene. Perhaps they handled a very
difficult situation brilliantly. Does that mean we have should be
silence
in the face of a US-paid for coup? If we do not expose the fact that a
NATO proxy force has seized power, or at least partly seized power, if
we
attempt to gloss over the hard reality, that US government overt and
covert
agencies organized and financed a coup in Yugoslavia - if we do not
tell
the truth about these things we would become the pets of the Empire: Yap
yap, cute doggy; don't worry, he doesn't bite. We would fail in our most
important task: to help the people in our countries understand the
Imperial
hand behind these events.
Peace activist Marjaleena Repo and Canadian Professor Kitsikis (the
latter
specializes in electoral practices in the Balkans) interviewed Vladeta
Jankovic, the man quoted by the "independent' above. This was at the
time
of the Sept 24 Yugoslav elections. Jankovic endorsed the taking of vast
sums of US
money. Jankovic justified it by saying "we really need it badly" - an
argument that can be used to justify any crime. Indeed. Prof. Kitsikis
responded that this was high treason. Jankovic had no answer.
Isn't it a bit late for Mr. Jankovic to posture about his virginity?
Jared Israel
For more on these questions please see www.tenc.net [Emperor's Clothes]
******************************************************
>From Milosevic to the Future
>From the standpoint of cameras and Western journalists, the fall of
Milosevic appears indistinguishable from other velvet and near-velvet
revolutions that have toppled dictators from Prague to Manila. A
righteous
outpouring of people into the streets, a ham-handed, venal government
capitulates and a new day is born.
But it is never as simple as breathless broadcasts might paint it. To
understand the fall of Slobodan Milosevic, it is important to understand
the manner in which he fell. The truth in Yugoslavia lies somewhere
between
the grand aesthetic of the public drama and the more mundane details of
deal making. Indeed, the latter is frequently more defining than the
former. And many disappointed expectations are rooted in details
overlooked
by revolution's glamour.
The roots of Milosevic's demise can be traced to the frustration of the
American and British governments, enmeshed in the realities of
peacekeeping
in Kosovo, with no hope of conclusion. NATO was trapped in a quagmire
without exit. In Belgrade, the opposition failed, divided, and were
discredited as agents of NATO, all against a backdrop of Serb
victimization.
Everyday Serbs were convinced of two things: They had not committed
atrocities, and they themselves were the targets of an unjust bombing
campaign. Milosevic was the great beneficiary. He might have been a
swine,
but he was Serbia's swine. Incompetent on many fronts, he at least
defended
the national interest. In this context, the opposition had as much
chance
of winning as Quisling had of carrying Norway in World War II.
The United States reacted with a new strategy. Described in "Toppling
Milosevic: The Carrot Instead of the Stick," the new strategy consisted
of
splitting Milosevic from his followers. Cracks opened but were contained
when Milosevic called for elections. But before the election it became
clear Milosevic had
nearly trapped himself, as recounted in "Checkmate in Yugoslavia,".
Milosevic's Cabinet, his cronies and the army and police held the key to
the drama. Milosevic had to be isolated from those levers of power
before
the crowds could storm parliament. Thousands could have been killed, as
they were in Romania with the fall of Ceaucescu. Milosevic might cling
to
power.
It was imperative the leadership split from Milosevic and accommodate
Kostunica. Public displays of police suddenly embracing demonstrators
probably had less to do with the passions of the moment than with
fevered
deals being made between Kostunica and former Milosevic followers. These
deals brought both the peace and the revolution.
The deals also created a revolution with a complex genesis and an
uncertain
future. Milosevic is certainly gone. The temptation among many,
including
his closest followers, is to blame everything on him. The head of the
international war crimes tribunal in the Hague has made it clear
Milosevic
should be tried for war crimes, but Kostunica has made it clear he does
not
want to see prosecution proceed.
As president, he might be able to stomach Milosevic's trial, but many of
the people he and the United States had to deal with over the past few
months are also subject to indictment and trial. They would not have
been
as cooperative had Kostunica and likely the United States not made
guarantees about their legal status. Given the example of former
President
Augusto Pinochet of Chile, it seems probable that any world-wise
operators
asked for promises.
As important as the status of charges against Milosevic followers, is
the
issue of Serbian territorial claims, particularly in Kosovo. Kostunica
was
an adamant supporter of Serbian claims in Kosovo. What did the United
States promise Kostunica? Indeed, how long can Kostunica survive without
some movement on Kosovo? And what will Albanians do about the new
darling
of the West?
Kostunica himself remains an enigma. The West would like to turn him
into
another Vaclav Havel. He is not a communist, but he is not a liberal
either. He is a nationalist who, like the rest of Serbia, has viewed the
West with suspicion. He has also created a coalition of diverse
elements,
including former Milosevic supporters who hope to retain their
influence,
if not their position.
It is reasonable to say Kostunica is a snapshot of Serbia today: tired
of
Milosevic, deeply suspicious and resentful of the West, nationalistic to
the very bone. Kostunica is formally democratic, but he understands the
complex personalism and clannishness that comprise Balkan culture. No
Havel, Kostunica is a hardline
nationalist who has come to power partly by accommodating his public
enemies.
The fall of Milosevic gives the West the opportunity to wash its hands
of
the mess. But trying to wash hands and actually washing them are
different
things. The West now finds itself in a position in which it must support
a
political figure financially and politically. The problem is that
political
figure has certain interests that will likely be anathema. If the West
does
not support him, it loses credibility. If it does, it can wind up
supporting the very perspectives that helped lead to war in the first
place.
This is what the ethnic Albanians in Kosovo will fear most. They see
Kostunica as the West's excuse to abandon the Albanians to the Serbs
once
again. And, indeed, that might be the case. Washington, weary of the
mess,
may well declare victory and go home.
(c) 2000 Stratfor, Inc.
***************************************************************
DJINDJIC: FUTURE STATE WILL BE UNION OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
ZAGREB, October 7 (Tanjug) - The future state will not be Yugoslavia
but a
union of Serbia and Montenegro with a common foreign policy, defense and
currency, Democratic Opposition of Serbia (DOS) election headquarters
chief
Zoran Djindjic said for the Zagreb daily Jutarnji list on Saturday.
Everything else will be separate, he said, adding that a common
parliament, government and president were "unnecessary."
Asked if he would agree to a secession of Montenegro, Djindjic said
this
republic could be as independent as it wished, and that, if the majority
people agreed to secession, "that is not an issue at all."
The situation with Kosovo and Metohija province is different "because
that
region is seen by people as a cradle of the Serb being," Djindjic said.
"Our monasteries, our history" are there, he said.
"In Kosovo at first we want to be present in resolving problems and
realizing international decisions through a new ministry in Pristina
which
would settle problems in the field. Anything else would be an illusion.
Integration is not realistic," he said.
Djindjic said the main issue in future contacts with Croatia would be
the
problem of refugees, and that relations would become harmonious once
this
was settled. He said he believed there was no more hatred for Croatia in
Serbia.
---
Why Germany is in a hurry to help
GERMANY DISBURSES A MILLION EUROS FOR CLEARING DANUBE IN YUGOSLAVIA
BERLIN, October 8 (Tanjug) - Germany paid on Friday the first
instalment
out of one million euros (1.95 million German marks) pledged for
clearing
the River Danube through Yugoslavia, according to a foreign ministry
spokesman in Berlin on Saturday.
The payment of 500,000 euros (977,500 G-marks), spokesman Andreas
Michaelis said, was made into an international fund for clearing the
Danube, an important European traffic artery that NATO's bombs closed to
navigation last year.
This makes Germany the first donor actually to make a payment to the
Fund,
Michaelis said, adding that Germany was giving the first clear signal of
support for a democratic Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, both
bilaterally
and as a member of the European Union.
He explained that the campaign for clearing the Danube of the debris of
war had long been planned, but could not be implemented because of
frequent
disagreements with the Yugoslav side.
He went on to say that the problem was expected to be cleared up soon
with
the inauguration of Yugoslavia's new President Vojislav Kostunica.
**********************************************
Albright Says Priority Is to Help Kostunica
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States said on Sunday that its
priority
in Yugoslavia was to help President Vojislav Kostunica by lifting
economic
sanctions and giving the people of Yugoslavia a democracy dividend.
Accountability for defeated Yugoslav leader and indicted war criminal
Slobodan Milosevic (news - web sites) will come ``ultimately'' as
Yugoslavia becomes part of a democratic Europe, Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright said on NBC's ``Meet the Press'' program.
Kostunica took the oath of office on Saturday, one day after Milosevic
conceded defeat in presidential elections held on Sept. 24. He has said
he
opposes extraditing Milosevic to face trial on war crimes charges in The
Hague.
Albright said she was confident that Yugoslavs would eventually come
round
to the view that Milosevic should face trial.
``They will get behind this, believe me, when they figure out that they
are free and democratic and that they will be a part of a real Europe,''
she said.
But she added: ``We have to show the Serb people that they did the
right
thing by going out to vote. They need to have some dividends out of
democracy.
``I have no doubt that there will be accountability and Yugoslavia will
not be truly free until that happens. We have to give President
Kostunica
now a chance. Let's help him. The people of Serbia have voted for him.
Let's help him.''
``We want to support him, we want to get assistance to him. I've been
talking to our European partners. We will be lifting certain economic
sanctions to make sure that the people can recover and the Danube is
cleared,'' she added.
Portions of the Danube River in Yugoslavia are closed to traffic
because
of bridges wrecked by NATO (news - web sites)'s bombing campaign last
year.
The European Union is expected on Monday to lift a ban on oil sales and
flights to Yugoslavia. A freeze on the assets of former leaders will
stay.
Pressed on whether extradition of Milosevic was a condition for an end
to
sanctions, Albright noted there was no time limit on prosecutions for
war
crimes for Milosevic and other indicted Serbs, such as Bosnian Serb
political leader Radovan Karadzic and his military chief Ratko Mladic.
``It doesn't run out. ... The United States has insisted and, believe
me,
their time will come,'' she said.
Albright also made a rare foray into domestic politics, backing Vice
President Al Gore (news - web sites), a fellow Democrat, against Texas
Governor George Bush on Balkan policy.
In the first presidential debate on Tuesday, the Republican Bush called
for a bigger Russian role in pushing Milosevic to leave power, a
position
Gore opposed on the grounds that the Russians had not yet recognized
Kostunica as winner.
Albright criticized the Russians for their delay in deciding that
Milosevic had lost.
``Frankly they were late. It took them a little while to assess the
reality there but ultimately, in recognizing President Kostunica they
have
done the right thing.
``We did not want the Russians to mediate, and Vice President Gore made
that quite clear. ... The way the vice president described it was right.
They did not play the role that they needed to at the right time,'' she
said.
*********************************************************
DINKIC: RATE OF EXCHANGE HALVED FOR D-MARK
BELGRADE, October 8 (Tanjug) - G 17 PLUS Executive Director Mladjan
Dinkic
said on Sunday that the new authorities have taken control over the
Foreign
Currency Department and the Payment Operations Service of the National
Bank
of Yugoslavia.
Consequently, the black-market rate of exchange for the D-mark has been
halved and the going rate is now 22 dinars, instead of 40 of two days
ago,
Dinkic said.
The new authorities prevented the withdrawal of some 50 million D-marks
from an account at the National Bank on Friday, even though the
withdrawal
slip had been based on a legitimate decision of the federal government,
Dinkic said, explaining that this action had been carried out in the
interest of the people.
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/submit2.htm
Opposition Leader Djindjic Calls for Complete Yugoslav
Submission to U.S.
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
Comments by Jared Israel (10-09-2000)
Comments: An AP dispatch, reprinted below, gives some glimpse of the
speed
with which the U.S. is consolidating its position in Yugoslavia.
The critical statement in the AP dispatch is made by Zoran Djindjic.
Djindjic is an
open employee of the U.S. and German governments and a key organizer of
the
distribution of US-German bribe money within Yugoslavia. Here is the
account of his
remarks:
"A key Kostunica aide, Zoran Djindjic, signaled the new government's
desire for closer ties to Washington after an election campaign in
which
the opposition sought to distance itself from the United States
because of
public anger over last year's NATO bombing campaign.
'''Without a strategic partnership with America, there is no
solution for
the Serbian national interests,' Djindjic said.'' ('AP', 10-09-2000)
The domination of Yugoslavia by Imperial powers is the precondition for
aggressive
action towards Russia, the Caucuses, Central Asia, Greece and other
countries which
have not entirely folded under U.S. pressure. Even those Balkans
countries where the
US has almost unchallenged domination, like Albania, Bulgaria and the
former
Yugoslav Republics, would find themselves under much harsher conditions
if
Yugoslavia falls to the U.S. For Yugoslavia has stood as a beacon, an
alternative to the
U.S.; if U.S. government behavior got too harsh, there was always
Yugoslavia as a
focal point of resistance. But as Senator Biden said in the July 29,
1999 Senate
hearings on Yugoslavia:
"I mean, for example, it's amazing what can happen when you
eliminate the
extremes. I mean, the single best thing that ever happened to the
Republic of
Srpska is we kicked the living hell out of Milosevic. There ain't no
alternative
left. …It's amazing what a salutary impact that has upon extremes in
countries.
And that's why the single best thing we -- my dream is to visit
Milosevic in
prison. (Laughter.) I mean that sincerely. I'm not being facetious.
Because you
put Milosevic in prison, and things in the region will change
drastically."
(Senator Joseph Biden at Senate Hearings on Serbia, July 29, 1999,
Quoted in
"US Arrogance and Yugoslav Elections', readable at
www.emperors-clothes.com/engl2.htm )
Thus Djindjic's statement is very serious. It translates: the Serbs must
become the
tool of the US in its effort to subjugate a vast section of the world.
There is an obstacle for the U.S. government. The bulk of the Serbian
people as well
as other loyal Yugoslavs who live in Serbia, are opposed to U.S.-German
control of
the Balkans. This is why throughout the century Germany's key
geopolitical goal has
been to crush Serbia. Crushing Serbia was and is the precondition for
firmly
consolidating power in the Balkans and going after the East, the former
Soviet Union.
So how does Djindjic, who is now so openly the dominant leader in the
DOS (the
opposition) - how does he intend to make Serbs and others who oppose US
domination accept US domination? There is only one way: terror. We have
received
first hand reports that terror is going on right now. It is highly
organized. The
terrorist groups, which are controlled by the DOS, have lists of people
who belong to
parties other than DOS or who are non-party, as well as those considered
"nationalist
activists." These, especially the activists, are the target; they are
being physically
attacked or threatened with attack. Institutions (e.g., the Customs
Department) and
key businesses are being illegally seized. The increasing campaign of
terror by
opposition forces is just barely hinted at in the Western media.
The method for dealing with difficult Serbs is long established. It is:
kill them. This
was how the pro-German government in Croatia tried to make Yugoslavia
safe for
German domination: it wiped out over 700,000 Serbs (as well as almost
all Jews and
countless Gypsies.) Get rid of the troublesome elements - that was the
method.
It was done twice after World War II. The Tito government was interested
in
reducing the influence of Serbia in the new Yugoslavia. So it
slaughtered the Cetniks
whom the British turned over. And then, in 1948, when Tito decided to go
all-out
with a Western strategy he ordered the murder of between 50,000 and
100,000
Serbian Communists.
If the Serbian and other loyal Yugoslav people do not resist they will
be eliminated.
Do not be deceived by sweet talking US leaders, NGO activists, and the
like. The US
government, dedicated to efficiency, always applies the simplest
solution to a
problem. When they encountered groups of Korean refugees who might
include
North Korean agents, they simply shot everyone in the group.
If the Serbs do resist, they may face great difficulties; on the other
hand, they may
succeed in stopping the terror. The vast majority of the population does
not want the
coup but they are to some extent cowed by terror, by the indecision of
the governing
forces, who have plenty of weaknesses, by the apparent vacillation of
the Russians and
by the fierce determination of the US side, inside and outside
Yugoslavia. And many
people are of course confused by the false promises of massive economic
aid.
Preparing to defend themselves, not to adopt foolhardy measures, but to
take firm
measures to guarantee the rule of law, including demanding the arrest of
those who
sacked Parliament, who illegally have seized government institutions,
and so on -
taking these firm measures is the only hope of the Serbian people. If
these measures
are not taken there will be great suffering. At this point organized
forces, such as the
Army, may still be able to act.
As for the U.S. government, it can "live with" the possibility of great
suffering in
Yugoslavia and throughout the Balkans if the result is US domination of
the area.
Remember, we are dealing with people like Madeline Albright. When asked
whether
she felt the containment of Iraq was worth the death of the 500,000
children killed by
sanctions, she said "Yes, I believe it is." You see, she felt their
pain, but she endured.
The plan is mainly to use proxy forces to do the dirty work. This is how
the moderate
Muslims and Serbs in Bosnia were fought - by Islamist Muslims working
with the US
Ambassador and an army of US government and semi-government helpers, as
well
as plenty of money and arms. People are silenced by terror and then
recruited by
terror. The anti-racist Croatians were the first target of Mr. Tudjman's
neo-Nazis in
Croatia. The KLA is just the latest example of a proxy force suppressing
"its own"
people.
The use of domestic forces (in this case the "Serbian opposition") to
suppress a
difficult population would allow NATO to bring in troops in the guise of
supporting
native leaders. This is the classic divide and rule policy that colonial
powers have
employed since Rome. It is .much less politically costly at home than
outright
invasion.
Make no mistake: the danger of war, including nuclear war, is increased
rather than
diminished by this most reckless US policy. For one of the key targets
of what Mr.
Djindjic calls "a strategic alliance with the U.S." is Russia. And
Russia is bristling
with nuclear arms.
Whether the Yugoslav people stand up now and fight, or do not, there
will be
suffering, which is a tragedy. But if they fail to stop the opposition's
illegal actions
their suffering will be incomparably worse. The U.S. elite is not a
tolerant winner. Its
goal remains to crush Serbia as even a potential political force.
Yugoslav PM and Police Chief Resign
By DUSAN STOJANOVIC .c The Associated Press
BELGRADE, Yugoslavia (AP) - Key remnants of Slobodan Milosevic's regime
crumbled Monday after Yugoslavia's prime minister and the country's most
powerful
police chief resigned. Early elections were set for the Serbian
parliament, a last
bastion of the old order.
Riding the wave of public support that brought him to power, President
Vojislav
Kostunica moved swiftly to drive out remaining Milosevic stalwarts. The
government
in Serbia, the main Yugoslav republic, was expected to be dissolved
Tuesday.
Just two days after formally taking office, Kostunica was also putting
his supporters in
charge of the country's most important institutions, including the
police, judiciary,
banks and state-run companies.
A key Kostunica aide, Zoran Djindjic, signaled the new government's
desire for
closer ties to Washington after an election campaign in which the
opposition sought
to distance itself from the United States because of public anger over
last year's
NATO bombing campaign.
``Without a strategic partnership with America, there is no solution for
the Serbian
national interests,'' Djindjic said.
Milosevic, who has been holed up at one of the president's official
residences in a
Belgrade suburb, remained out of public view Monday.
But two of his key allies, federal Prime Minister Momir Bulatovic and
Serbian
Interior Minister Vlajko Stojiljkovic - who controlled about 100,000
policemen -
both stepped down.
All major Serbian parties agreed to early parliamentary elections in
December - a
move that could spell the end of Milosevic supporters' control of the
republic's
government and legislature. Given the current popular support for
Kostunica, his
allies are likely to win a strong majority in the new parliament.
Serbia is home to more than 90 percent of Yugoslavs and whoever rules it
holds the
balance of authority in the country, which includes one other republic,
Montenegro. If
the current Serbian government and the parliament remain in place, they
could block
many pro-democracy reforms pushed by Kostunica on the federal level.
Serbia's president and parliament are elected separately from federal
posts and were
not involved in the contentious federal vote Sept. 24. Serbian President
Milan
Milutinovic and other Serbian government leaders were elected in 1998 to
four-year
terms.
Still, Milosevic's hard-line allies in the Serbian parliament were
trying to keep the
current legislature in place until the new elections, despite calls for
its immediate
dissolution.
``This is a highway robbery,'' said Vojislav Seselj, Serbia's
ultranationalist deputy
prime minister who has been allied with Milosevic. ``You will not get
our blessing for
a coup,'' referring to alleged forceful removal of Milosevic's cronies
from all major
state institutions.
Seselj accused pro-democracy forces of using ``lynching methods'' to
force out rivals.
Seselj, for the first time, acknowledged that Serbia's parliament had
lost control of
the republic's police to pro-Kostunica forces.
As Seselj was leaving Serbia's parliament, he was jostled by an irate
crowd. One of his
bodyguards fired shots in the air, and a photographer was punched and
kicked in the
head by a bodyguard. No one was seriously hurt.
In the streets, factories and other public places, anger against
Milosevic's cronies
sometimes boiled over into violence.
A mob of workers attacked Radoman Bozovic, a close Milosevic aide and
the director
of a major Belgrade trading corporation. He tried to flee from his car,
but he was
caught and beaten. His bodyguards snatched him and moved him into a
nearby
building for safety. Later, Bozovic resigned as the head of Genex, the
biggest
state-run import-export operation.
In the city of Nis, workers stormed the state-run textile factory,
Nitex, demanding the
management be fired. Employees of Investbanka demanded that Borka Vucic,
a top
financial associate of Milosevic, leave the Belgrade headquarters of the
state-run
bank because ``her safety is jeopardized.''
As the vestiges of the old regime were being cleared away, the European
Union lifted
economic sanctions against Yugoslavia and offered it $2 billion in aid
to help rebuild
the country, as well as lifting key anti-Milosevic sanctions.
The decision marked a turning point in Yugoslavia's relations with the
rest of Europe
and was seen as a first step toward integrating the country into the
European
mainstream.
Still, obstacles remained for the Kostunica camp.
Yugoslavia's defense minister attempted Monday to rally opponents of the
new
government, issuing a last-ditch appeal to Milosevic's shaken supporters
not to
abandon the ousted leader.
Gen. Dragoljub Ojdanic said that ``the disunity among the Serbs is
inciting the plans
of our proven (foreign) enemies'' to occupy the country. Milosevic's
allies have
consistently referred to Kostunica and his followers as Western lackeys
bent on
taking over the Serb state.
Ojdanic, a close Milosevic ally who has also been indicted for war
crimes, has not
formally recognized Kostunica as the new Yugoslav president and is not
expected to
keep his position in the new government. He has no direct control of the
military,
which has fallen under Kostunica's command.
Still, he retains influence among the military brass, and any call he
might make to
rally pro-Milosevic forces could be problematic for the new regime.
The military leadership - which consist mostly of Milosevic loyalists -
has only
grudgingly endorsed Kostunica as the new head of state. The top generals
will likely be
all replaced as part of a sweeping purge of Milosevic supporters.
(c) AP-NY-10-09-00 1536EDT Reproduced for fair use only
Footnote
Several articles on Emperor's Clothes have dealt with the G-17 econ
omists. We
especially suggest reading:
* 'The International Monetary Fund And The Yugoslav Elections' by Michel
Chossudovsky and Jared Irael at
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/1.htm
* 'Yugoslav Opposition Negotiates Surrender of Yugoslavia' by Michel
Chossudovsky
and Jared Irael at http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/11.htm
***
We get by with a little help from our friends...
We receive all of our funding from individuals like you. We want
everyone to read our
articles, whether they can contribute financially or not, but if you are
able to
contribute, please do. Recently we were shut down for a wee by a hacker.
We are
taking steps to improve our security and also to increase the number of
people we
reach with our analyses. These improvements cost money.
Small contributions hel and so do big ones. You can make a donation by
mailing a
check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321.
(USA) Or
if you'd like to do it by credit card, please call 617 916-1705 between
9:30 AM and
5:30 PM, Eastern Time (USA). .
Thanks for reading and thanks for helping. It's a joint effort, isn't
it?
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
---
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/dos2.htm
DOS leader Djindjic: Yugoslavia is to be no more
Text of statement from Montenegrin Website of the Soros "Open Society"
type.
Comments by Jared Israel, Emperor's Clothes
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
"Djindjic said that he explained DOS’s thinking on renewing FRY.'We
believe the joint state should not be called Yugoslavia but the “The
Union
of Serbia and Montenegro'....Responding to the question of whether
this is
really DOS’s program, given Vojislav Kostunica’s statement on
strengthening the joint state, Djindjic said: “We, in the campaign,
did not
have completely differing views on these issues. I explained these
ideas in
the joint meetings of the DOS leaders and they were positively
accepted
both in the coalition and by the Serbian public."
Comments: It becomes increasingly evident with every passing hour that
Mr.
Kostunica is not the dominant leader in the Serbian opposition. The key
person is
Zoran Djindjic. In the text below, Mr. Djindjic is asked if Mr.
Kostunica accepts his
idea for dissolving Yugoslavia. His response is diplomatic but perfectly
clear: Djindjic
lays down the law, Kostunica follows. And why not? He is the point man
for the US;
he is the guy with the $77 million dollar check.
Djindjic seems slated to be Prime Minister. Mr. Dinkic from the
US/German-
controlled G-17 group of economists is slated to be head of a
colonial-style Central
Bank. [See Footnote near end]
Djindjic Proposes Abolition of Yugoslavia
When Mr. Djindjic opens his mouth it is Madeline Albright talking.
The consequences of the proposal to abolish Yugoslavia, expressed by Mr.
Djindjic in
the name of the entire opposition including Mr. Kostunica, are very
grave. . The
continued existence of Yugoslavia is the critical question in the
Balkans. Yugoslavia's
existence prevents the consolidation of US/German power in the Balkans
and
therefore hinders taking aggressive action toward the former Soviet
Union.
The act of relinquishing the name "Yugoslavia" would be a sharp blow to
the morale
of those who are trying to hold back the US/German assault.
Moreover, if Yugoslavia ceased to exist there would be immediate
consequences.
These would include the loss of all Yugoslav property, currently held by
Yugoslavia or
frozen by order of the U.S. This amounts to over $20 billion US. It
would mean that
the agreement by which Kosovo is legally part of Serbia - UN resolution
1244 - would
be void because that agreement was signed by the UN and Yugoslavia. It
would mean
the Yugoslavs would lose all right to speak in the UN - a right the US
has suppressed.
But up until now the Yugoslavs have had legality on their side. Agreeing
that
Yugoslavia is no more means relinquishing all claim to legal rights.
Here is the full text of the report on the conversation betyween Zoran
Djindjic and
Milo Djukanovic.
Djukanovic and Kostunica schedule a meeting on changes
in the military leadership
President of Montenegro, Milo Djukanovic and the new president of FRY
Vojislav
Kostunica agreed that a meeting of the Supreme defense council should be
held soon,
where changes in the military leadership could be agreed, it was
confirmed by the
leader of the Democratic party, Zoran Djindjic.
Djindjic said that Kostunica and Djukanovic spoke on the phone and
agreed that a
meeting of the Supreme council should be held within the next three
days.
Djukanovic met Djindjic, who was representing the Democratic Opposition
of Serbia,
last night in Podgorica. Djindjic informed Djukanovic on DOS’s plans to
possibly
form an expert government with the SNP. This government would spend the
first two
to three months around issues connected to the removal of international
sanctions
and for the pledged international financial support for economic
recovery to be
realized, and therefore this government would not interfere in the
authorities of the
Republican governments. This government would “be voted in by the
representatives
of DOS, the Montenegrin SNP, and the occasional patriot from the SPS”,
said Djinjic.
The leader of the Democratic party claims that Djukanovic assessed this
idea as
interesting and “the least bad transitory solution”.
Djindjic said that he explained DOS’s thinking on renewing FRY.
“We believe the joint state should not be called Yugoslavia but the “The
Union of
Serbia and Montenegro”. This union should have much less joint
functions, because at
the moment there is a lot of overlap with the republics. The joint
functions should be
reduced to defense, and if regional stability is enhanced this would
assume a small
army, then also foreign policy and monetary policy based on a
convertible currency. It
is also true that the expensive institutions of the parliament and
government should
be reduced, because we already have this at the level of the independent
states. The
idea is to decrease the size of the federal functions but significantly
improve their
efficiency, which would mean reduced costs”, said the leader of the
Democratic party.
Responding to the question of whether this is really DOS’s program,
given Vojislav
Kostunica’s statement on strengthening the joint state, Djindjic said:
“We, in the campaign, did not have completely differing views on these
issues. I
explained these ideas in the joint meetings of the DOS leaders and they
were
positively accepted both in the coalition and by the Serbian public. I
think we should
first clarify what strengthening the joint state means. If the state has
three functions,
which are strong, this is better than if it has 20 which are weak”,
explained Djindjic.
Djindjic said the talks between the representatives of DOS and the
Montenegrin
government about the future relations between Serbia and Montenegro are
to start
this week.
***
Footnotes
Several articles on Emperor's Clothes have dealt with the G-17 group of
economists,
who are clearly slated to dominate the remaking of Yugoslavia. We
especially suggest
reading:
'The International Monetary Fund And The Yugoslav Elections' at
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/1.htm
'Yugoslav Opposition Negotiates Surrender of Yugoslavia' at
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/11.htm
We get by with a little help from our friends...
We receive all of our funding from individuals like you. We want
everyone to read our
articles, whether they can contribute financially or not, but if you are
able to
contribute, please do. Recently we were shut down for a wee by a hacker.
We are
taking steps to improve our security and also to increase the number of
people we
reach with our analyses. These improvements cost money.
Small contributions hel and so do big ones. You can make a donation by
mailing a
check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321.
(USA) Or
if you'd like to do it by credit card, please call 617 916-1705 between
9:30 AM and
5:30 PM, Eastern Time (USA). .
Thanks for reading and thanks for helping. It's a joint effort, isn't
it?
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
---
http://www.iacenter.org/nato_harvest.htm
NATO is getting ready to pick up the harvest
By Tanja Djurovic
Junge Welt, Monday, 9.10.2000
Belgrade -- "I've just received information from official sources
that Vojislav
Kostunica won the elections. I congratulate Mr. Kostunica on his
election victory...",
said recent Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic in his address to the
nation
broadcast on Yu-Info TV channel on Friday (Oct. 6), admitting defeat in
the
presidential elections by his opponent Vojislav Kostunica, candidate of
Democratic
opposition of Serbia (DOS).
"I personally intend to take a short break, to spend more time with my
family, and
then, afterwards, to primarily strengthen my party...Socialist party of
Serbia will be a
very strong opposition" finished Milosevic his address making it clear
that he has no
intention of fleeing the country, or leaving political life.
This seems to be the epilogue of election crisis in Yugoslavia and
two-week long
fight between Milosevic and Kostunica for presidency of FRY, which
culminated on
Thursday in Belgrade with mass and violent protests orchestrated by
DOS.
Vojislav Kostunica made his oath on Saturday night in Belgrade "Sava
Center", by
which he officially became new president of Yugoslavia. On the joint
constitutive
sessions of both chambers of Federal Parliament, Kostunica bounded
himself to
"respect and implement the Constitution of FRY and federal laws, to
preserve the
sovereignty, independence and integrity of FRY..."
Earlier in the night, both chambers of the Yugoslav Parliament were
constituted for
the new session. The Chamber of Citizens verified 119 out of 138 deputy
mandates,
and Chamber of Republics 39 out of 40 mandates.
In both chambers of the Federal Parliament the representatives of
Milosevic's left
coalition have the majority. This was clear from the start, and even DOS
representatives agreed to it.
Still, Milosevic's obvious presence in Yugoslav capital and appearance
on TV,
putting the end to rumors and wild guesses as to his whereabouts and
intentions, came
as a shock to DOS leaders and their supporters, who had been convinced
that
ex-Yugoslav president had long since left Belgrade, if not indeed the
country. That,
coupled with the fact that a leftist government might be formed soon, is
casting a
shadow on DOS's present advantage.
Zoran Djindjic, DOS campaign manager, gave a statement to the press
immediately
after Milosevic's address on Friday, saying that Slobodan Milosevic is
just preparing a
blow from the back and intends to consolidate the police forces, so he
could come
back on scene as a tough hand. Obviously afraid that someone or
something can still
endanger their "democratic revolution", Djindjic finished rather
paranoically: "I do
not trust Milosevic!"
Still, if Milosevic is not to be trusted, why not accept the
assurances and
congratulations offered to Kostunica by thehighest representatives of
the army and
police? It seems that DOS's fear of one man and his presence is so
great, that not
even the fact that those institutions didn't react during Thursday's
vandalistic
demonstrations can reassure the Serbian opposition.
Perhaps the DOS is simply being aware of its own fragility: from the
very beginning,
it has been highly dependent on foreign support and money. This ad hoc
alliance of
some 18 parties has only one common ground and program - to oust
Milosevic.
Not to forget that the DOS candidate, newly-proclaimed FRY president
Kostunica,
is a leader of a small party with low support from the people, and a man
of low
significance. The person running the show for this particular puppet on
a string is
Zoran Djindjic, who in his own turn is a puppet of the administration in
Washington.
Not to forget that over 2 million Yugoslav citizens voted against
Kostunica precisely
for the above mentioned reasons, knowing who the powers behind DOS are
and not
wanting to be a part of "Pax Americana".
"Slobodan Milosevic had very little or no chance at all" said Petar
Raskov (70), a
Federal court judge on pension, underlining that pressure exercised on
Serbia, of
power, money and media combined, was too heavy for Serbian people not to
yield.
"Milosevic was the only man to preserve the FRY resistance to NATO's
"Drang nach
Osten" (Push to the East) strategy. I couldn't vote for NATO, not even
if it puts on a
disguise of Serbian nationalist with anti-American policy".
As for those who did - a gun at man's temple can be a good incentive,
and endlessly
repeated "international community" treats to Serbian people that as long
as Milosevic
is Yugoslav president, sanctions against their country won't be lifted,
obviously
influenced the ultimate decision, especially with the young people.
"I didn't vote for Kostunica, he is nobody!" says Milan Ristic (24), a
student from
Belgrade. "But his victory might bring better days for Yugoslavia. I
voted against
Milosevic, because the whole world was against him!"
Therefore, after plowing Yugoslav land with bombs and missiles in
Spring of 1999,
after fertilizing it for over a year with media-launched lies and money,
Military
Alliance of the West is getting ready to pick up the harvest.
Tanja Djurovic is a Junge Welt correspondent from Belgrade.
Opposition Leader Djindjic Calls for Complete Yugoslav
Submission to U.S.
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
Comments by Jared Israel (10-09-2000)
Comments: An AP dispatch, reprinted below, gives some glimpse of the
speed
with which the U.S. is consolidating its position in Yugoslavia.
The critical statement in the AP dispatch is made by Zoran Djindjic.
Djindjic is an
open employee of the U.S. and German governments and a key organizer of
the
distribution of US-German bribe money within Yugoslavia. Here is the
account of his
remarks:
"A key Kostunica aide, Zoran Djindjic, signaled the new government's
desire for closer ties to Washington after an election campaign in
which
the opposition sought to distance itself from the United States
because of
public anger over last year's NATO bombing campaign.
'''Without a strategic partnership with America, there is no
solution for
the Serbian national interests,' Djindjic said.'' ('AP', 10-09-2000)
The domination of Yugoslavia by Imperial powers is the precondition for
aggressive
action towards Russia, the Caucuses, Central Asia, Greece and other
countries which
have not entirely folded under U.S. pressure. Even those Balkans
countries where the
US has almost unchallenged domination, like Albania, Bulgaria and the
former
Yugoslav Republics, would find themselves under much harsher conditions
if
Yugoslavia falls to the U.S. For Yugoslavia has stood as a beacon, an
alternative to the
U.S.; if U.S. government behavior got too harsh, there was always
Yugoslavia as a
focal point of resistance. But as Senator Biden said in the July 29,
1999 Senate
hearings on Yugoslavia:
"I mean, for example, it's amazing what can happen when you
eliminate the
extremes. I mean, the single best thing that ever happened to the
Republic of
Srpska is we kicked the living hell out of Milosevic. There ain't no
alternative
left. …It's amazing what a salutary impact that has upon extremes in
countries.
And that's why the single best thing we -- my dream is to visit
Milosevic in
prison. (Laughter.) I mean that sincerely. I'm not being facetious.
Because you
put Milosevic in prison, and things in the region will change
drastically."
(Senator Joseph Biden at Senate Hearings on Serbia, July 29, 1999,
Quoted in
"US Arrogance and Yugoslav Elections', readable at
www.emperors-clothes.com/engl2.htm )
Thus Djindjic's statement is very serious. It translates: the Serbs must
become the
tool of the US in its effort to subjugate a vast section of the world.
There is an obstacle for the U.S. government. The bulk of the Serbian
people as well
as other loyal Yugoslavs who live in Serbia, are opposed to U.S.-German
control of
the Balkans. This is why throughout the century Germany's key
geopolitical goal has
been to crush Serbia. Crushing Serbia was and is the precondition for
firmly
consolidating power in the Balkans and going after the East, the former
Soviet Union.
So how does Djindjic, who is now so openly the dominant leader in the
DOS (the
opposition) - how does he intend to make Serbs and others who oppose US
domination accept US domination? There is only one way: terror. We have
received
first hand reports that terror is going on right now. It is highly
organized. The
terrorist groups, which are controlled by the DOS, have lists of people
who belong to
parties other than DOS or who are non-party, as well as those considered
"nationalist
activists." These, especially the activists, are the target; they are
being physically
attacked or threatened with attack. Institutions (e.g., the Customs
Department) and
key businesses are being illegally seized. The increasing campaign of
terror by
opposition forces is just barely hinted at in the Western media.
The method for dealing with difficult Serbs is long established. It is:
kill them. This
was how the pro-German government in Croatia tried to make Yugoslavia
safe for
German domination: it wiped out over 700,000 Serbs (as well as almost
all Jews and
countless Gypsies.) Get rid of the troublesome elements - that was the
method.
It was done twice after World War II. The Tito government was interested
in
reducing the influence of Serbia in the new Yugoslavia. So it
slaughtered the Cetniks
whom the British turned over. And then, in 1948, when Tito decided to go
all-out
with a Western strategy he ordered the murder of between 50,000 and
100,000
Serbian Communists.
If the Serbian and other loyal Yugoslav people do not resist they will
be eliminated.
Do not be deceived by sweet talking US leaders, NGO activists, and the
like. The US
government, dedicated to efficiency, always applies the simplest
solution to a
problem. When they encountered groups of Korean refugees who might
include
North Korean agents, they simply shot everyone in the group.
If the Serbs do resist, they may face great difficulties; on the other
hand, they may
succeed in stopping the terror. The vast majority of the population does
not want the
coup but they are to some extent cowed by terror, by the indecision of
the governing
forces, who have plenty of weaknesses, by the apparent vacillation of
the Russians and
by the fierce determination of the US side, inside and outside
Yugoslavia. And many
people are of course confused by the false promises of massive economic
aid.
Preparing to defend themselves, not to adopt foolhardy measures, but to
take firm
measures to guarantee the rule of law, including demanding the arrest of
those who
sacked Parliament, who illegally have seized government institutions,
and so on -
taking these firm measures is the only hope of the Serbian people. If
these measures
are not taken there will be great suffering. At this point organized
forces, such as the
Army, may still be able to act.
As for the U.S. government, it can "live with" the possibility of great
suffering in
Yugoslavia and throughout the Balkans if the result is US domination of
the area.
Remember, we are dealing with people like Madeline Albright. When asked
whether
she felt the containment of Iraq was worth the death of the 500,000
children killed by
sanctions, she said "Yes, I believe it is." You see, she felt their
pain, but she endured.
The plan is mainly to use proxy forces to do the dirty work. This is how
the moderate
Muslims and Serbs in Bosnia were fought - by Islamist Muslims working
with the US
Ambassador and an army of US government and semi-government helpers, as
well
as plenty of money and arms. People are silenced by terror and then
recruited by
terror. The anti-racist Croatians were the first target of Mr. Tudjman's
neo-Nazis in
Croatia. The KLA is just the latest example of a proxy force suppressing
"its own"
people.
The use of domestic forces (in this case the "Serbian opposition") to
suppress a
difficult population would allow NATO to bring in troops in the guise of
supporting
native leaders. This is the classic divide and rule policy that colonial
powers have
employed since Rome. It is .much less politically costly at home than
outright
invasion.
Make no mistake: the danger of war, including nuclear war, is increased
rather than
diminished by this most reckless US policy. For one of the key targets
of what Mr.
Djindjic calls "a strategic alliance with the U.S." is Russia. And
Russia is bristling
with nuclear arms.
Whether the Yugoslav people stand up now and fight, or do not, there
will be
suffering, which is a tragedy. But if they fail to stop the opposition's
illegal actions
their suffering will be incomparably worse. The U.S. elite is not a
tolerant winner. Its
goal remains to crush Serbia as even a potential political force.
Yugoslav PM and Police Chief Resign
By DUSAN STOJANOVIC .c The Associated Press
BELGRADE, Yugoslavia (AP) - Key remnants of Slobodan Milosevic's regime
crumbled Monday after Yugoslavia's prime minister and the country's most
powerful
police chief resigned. Early elections were set for the Serbian
parliament, a last
bastion of the old order.
Riding the wave of public support that brought him to power, President
Vojislav
Kostunica moved swiftly to drive out remaining Milosevic stalwarts. The
government
in Serbia, the main Yugoslav republic, was expected to be dissolved
Tuesday.
Just two days after formally taking office, Kostunica was also putting
his supporters in
charge of the country's most important institutions, including the
police, judiciary,
banks and state-run companies.
A key Kostunica aide, Zoran Djindjic, signaled the new government's
desire for
closer ties to Washington after an election campaign in which the
opposition sought
to distance itself from the United States because of public anger over
last year's
NATO bombing campaign.
``Without a strategic partnership with America, there is no solution for
the Serbian
national interests,'' Djindjic said.
Milosevic, who has been holed up at one of the president's official
residences in a
Belgrade suburb, remained out of public view Monday.
But two of his key allies, federal Prime Minister Momir Bulatovic and
Serbian
Interior Minister Vlajko Stojiljkovic - who controlled about 100,000
policemen -
both stepped down.
All major Serbian parties agreed to early parliamentary elections in
December - a
move that could spell the end of Milosevic supporters' control of the
republic's
government and legislature. Given the current popular support for
Kostunica, his
allies are likely to win a strong majority in the new parliament.
Serbia is home to more than 90 percent of Yugoslavs and whoever rules it
holds the
balance of authority in the country, which includes one other republic,
Montenegro. If
the current Serbian government and the parliament remain in place, they
could block
many pro-democracy reforms pushed by Kostunica on the federal level.
Serbia's president and parliament are elected separately from federal
posts and were
not involved in the contentious federal vote Sept. 24. Serbian President
Milan
Milutinovic and other Serbian government leaders were elected in 1998 to
four-year
terms.
Still, Milosevic's hard-line allies in the Serbian parliament were
trying to keep the
current legislature in place until the new elections, despite calls for
its immediate
dissolution.
``This is a highway robbery,'' said Vojislav Seselj, Serbia's
ultranationalist deputy
prime minister who has been allied with Milosevic. ``You will not get
our blessing for
a coup,'' referring to alleged forceful removal of Milosevic's cronies
from all major
state institutions.
Seselj accused pro-democracy forces of using ``lynching methods'' to
force out rivals.
Seselj, for the first time, acknowledged that Serbia's parliament had
lost control of
the republic's police to pro-Kostunica forces.
As Seselj was leaving Serbia's parliament, he was jostled by an irate
crowd. One of his
bodyguards fired shots in the air, and a photographer was punched and
kicked in the
head by a bodyguard. No one was seriously hurt.
In the streets, factories and other public places, anger against
Milosevic's cronies
sometimes boiled over into violence.
A mob of workers attacked Radoman Bozovic, a close Milosevic aide and
the director
of a major Belgrade trading corporation. He tried to flee from his car,
but he was
caught and beaten. His bodyguards snatched him and moved him into a
nearby
building for safety. Later, Bozovic resigned as the head of Genex, the
biggest
state-run import-export operation.
In the city of Nis, workers stormed the state-run textile factory,
Nitex, demanding the
management be fired. Employees of Investbanka demanded that Borka Vucic,
a top
financial associate of Milosevic, leave the Belgrade headquarters of the
state-run
bank because ``her safety is jeopardized.''
As the vestiges of the old regime were being cleared away, the European
Union lifted
economic sanctions against Yugoslavia and offered it $2 billion in aid
to help rebuild
the country, as well as lifting key anti-Milosevic sanctions.
The decision marked a turning point in Yugoslavia's relations with the
rest of Europe
and was seen as a first step toward integrating the country into the
European
mainstream.
Still, obstacles remained for the Kostunica camp.
Yugoslavia's defense minister attempted Monday to rally opponents of the
new
government, issuing a last-ditch appeal to Milosevic's shaken supporters
not to
abandon the ousted leader.
Gen. Dragoljub Ojdanic said that ``the disunity among the Serbs is
inciting the plans
of our proven (foreign) enemies'' to occupy the country. Milosevic's
allies have
consistently referred to Kostunica and his followers as Western lackeys
bent on
taking over the Serb state.
Ojdanic, a close Milosevic ally who has also been indicted for war
crimes, has not
formally recognized Kostunica as the new Yugoslav president and is not
expected to
keep his position in the new government. He has no direct control of the
military,
which has fallen under Kostunica's command.
Still, he retains influence among the military brass, and any call he
might make to
rally pro-Milosevic forces could be problematic for the new regime.
The military leadership - which consist mostly of Milosevic loyalists -
has only
grudgingly endorsed Kostunica as the new head of state. The top generals
will likely be
all replaced as part of a sweeping purge of Milosevic supporters.
(c) AP-NY-10-09-00 1536EDT Reproduced for fair use only
Footnote
Several articles on Emperor's Clothes have dealt with the G-17 econ
omists. We
especially suggest reading:
* 'The International Monetary Fund And The Yugoslav Elections' by Michel
Chossudovsky and Jared Irael at
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/1.htm
* 'Yugoslav Opposition Negotiates Surrender of Yugoslavia' by Michel
Chossudovsky
and Jared Irael at http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/11.htm
***
We get by with a little help from our friends...
We receive all of our funding from individuals like you. We want
everyone to read our
articles, whether they can contribute financially or not, but if you are
able to
contribute, please do. Recently we were shut down for a wee by a hacker.
We are
taking steps to improve our security and also to increase the number of
people we
reach with our analyses. These improvements cost money.
Small contributions hel and so do big ones. You can make a donation by
mailing a
check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321.
(USA) Or
if you'd like to do it by credit card, please call 617 916-1705 between
9:30 AM and
5:30 PM, Eastern Time (USA). .
Thanks for reading and thanks for helping. It's a joint effort, isn't
it?
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
---
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/dos2.htm
DOS leader Djindjic: Yugoslavia is to be no more
Text of statement from Montenegrin Website of the Soros "Open Society"
type.
Comments by Jared Israel, Emperor's Clothes
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
"Djindjic said that he explained DOS’s thinking on renewing FRY.'We
believe the joint state should not be called Yugoslavia but the “The
Union
of Serbia and Montenegro'....Responding to the question of whether
this is
really DOS’s program, given Vojislav Kostunica’s statement on
strengthening the joint state, Djindjic said: “We, in the campaign,
did not
have completely differing views on these issues. I explained these
ideas in
the joint meetings of the DOS leaders and they were positively
accepted
both in the coalition and by the Serbian public."
Comments: It becomes increasingly evident with every passing hour that
Mr.
Kostunica is not the dominant leader in the Serbian opposition. The key
person is
Zoran Djindjic. In the text below, Mr. Djindjic is asked if Mr.
Kostunica accepts his
idea for dissolving Yugoslavia. His response is diplomatic but perfectly
clear: Djindjic
lays down the law, Kostunica follows. And why not? He is the point man
for the US;
he is the guy with the $77 million dollar check.
Djindjic seems slated to be Prime Minister. Mr. Dinkic from the
US/German-
controlled G-17 group of economists is slated to be head of a
colonial-style Central
Bank. [See Footnote near end]
Djindjic Proposes Abolition of Yugoslavia
When Mr. Djindjic opens his mouth it is Madeline Albright talking.
The consequences of the proposal to abolish Yugoslavia, expressed by Mr.
Djindjic in
the name of the entire opposition including Mr. Kostunica, are very
grave. . The
continued existence of Yugoslavia is the critical question in the
Balkans. Yugoslavia's
existence prevents the consolidation of US/German power in the Balkans
and
therefore hinders taking aggressive action toward the former Soviet
Union.
The act of relinquishing the name "Yugoslavia" would be a sharp blow to
the morale
of those who are trying to hold back the US/German assault.
Moreover, if Yugoslavia ceased to exist there would be immediate
consequences.
These would include the loss of all Yugoslav property, currently held by
Yugoslavia or
frozen by order of the U.S. This amounts to over $20 billion US. It
would mean that
the agreement by which Kosovo is legally part of Serbia - UN resolution
1244 - would
be void because that agreement was signed by the UN and Yugoslavia. It
would mean
the Yugoslavs would lose all right to speak in the UN - a right the US
has suppressed.
But up until now the Yugoslavs have had legality on their side. Agreeing
that
Yugoslavia is no more means relinquishing all claim to legal rights.
Here is the full text of the report on the conversation betyween Zoran
Djindjic and
Milo Djukanovic.
Djukanovic and Kostunica schedule a meeting on changes
in the military leadership
President of Montenegro, Milo Djukanovic and the new president of FRY
Vojislav
Kostunica agreed that a meeting of the Supreme defense council should be
held soon,
where changes in the military leadership could be agreed, it was
confirmed by the
leader of the Democratic party, Zoran Djindjic.
Djindjic said that Kostunica and Djukanovic spoke on the phone and
agreed that a
meeting of the Supreme council should be held within the next three
days.
Djukanovic met Djindjic, who was representing the Democratic Opposition
of Serbia,
last night in Podgorica. Djindjic informed Djukanovic on DOS’s plans to
possibly
form an expert government with the SNP. This government would spend the
first two
to three months around issues connected to the removal of international
sanctions
and for the pledged international financial support for economic
recovery to be
realized, and therefore this government would not interfere in the
authorities of the
Republican governments. This government would “be voted in by the
representatives
of DOS, the Montenegrin SNP, and the occasional patriot from the SPS”,
said Djinjic.
The leader of the Democratic party claims that Djukanovic assessed this
idea as
interesting and “the least bad transitory solution”.
Djindjic said that he explained DOS’s thinking on renewing FRY.
“We believe the joint state should not be called Yugoslavia but the “The
Union of
Serbia and Montenegro”. This union should have much less joint
functions, because at
the moment there is a lot of overlap with the republics. The joint
functions should be
reduced to defense, and if regional stability is enhanced this would
assume a small
army, then also foreign policy and monetary policy based on a
convertible currency. It
is also true that the expensive institutions of the parliament and
government should
be reduced, because we already have this at the level of the independent
states. The
idea is to decrease the size of the federal functions but significantly
improve their
efficiency, which would mean reduced costs”, said the leader of the
Democratic party.
Responding to the question of whether this is really DOS’s program,
given Vojislav
Kostunica’s statement on strengthening the joint state, Djindjic said:
“We, in the campaign, did not have completely differing views on these
issues. I
explained these ideas in the joint meetings of the DOS leaders and they
were
positively accepted both in the coalition and by the Serbian public. I
think we should
first clarify what strengthening the joint state means. If the state has
three functions,
which are strong, this is better than if it has 20 which are weak”,
explained Djindjic.
Djindjic said the talks between the representatives of DOS and the
Montenegrin
government about the future relations between Serbia and Montenegro are
to start
this week.
***
Footnotes
Several articles on Emperor's Clothes have dealt with the G-17 group of
economists,
who are clearly slated to dominate the remaking of Yugoslavia. We
especially suggest
reading:
'The International Monetary Fund And The Yugoslav Elections' at
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/1.htm
'Yugoslav Opposition Negotiates Surrender of Yugoslavia' at
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/11.htm
We get by with a little help from our friends...
We receive all of our funding from individuals like you. We want
everyone to read our
articles, whether they can contribute financially or not, but if you are
able to
contribute, please do. Recently we were shut down for a wee by a hacker.
We are
taking steps to improve our security and also to increase the number of
people we
reach with our analyses. These improvements cost money.
Small contributions hel and so do big ones. You can make a donation by
mailing a
check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321.
(USA) Or
if you'd like to do it by credit card, please call 617 916-1705 between
9:30 AM and
5:30 PM, Eastern Time (USA). .
Thanks for reading and thanks for helping. It's a joint effort, isn't
it?
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
---
http://www.iacenter.org/nato_harvest.htm
NATO is getting ready to pick up the harvest
By Tanja Djurovic
Junge Welt, Monday, 9.10.2000
Belgrade -- "I've just received information from official sources
that Vojislav
Kostunica won the elections. I congratulate Mr. Kostunica on his
election victory...",
said recent Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic in his address to the
nation
broadcast on Yu-Info TV channel on Friday (Oct. 6), admitting defeat in
the
presidential elections by his opponent Vojislav Kostunica, candidate of
Democratic
opposition of Serbia (DOS).
"I personally intend to take a short break, to spend more time with my
family, and
then, afterwards, to primarily strengthen my party...Socialist party of
Serbia will be a
very strong opposition" finished Milosevic his address making it clear
that he has no
intention of fleeing the country, or leaving political life.
This seems to be the epilogue of election crisis in Yugoslavia and
two-week long
fight between Milosevic and Kostunica for presidency of FRY, which
culminated on
Thursday in Belgrade with mass and violent protests orchestrated by
DOS.
Vojislav Kostunica made his oath on Saturday night in Belgrade "Sava
Center", by
which he officially became new president of Yugoslavia. On the joint
constitutive
sessions of both chambers of Federal Parliament, Kostunica bounded
himself to
"respect and implement the Constitution of FRY and federal laws, to
preserve the
sovereignty, independence and integrity of FRY..."
Earlier in the night, both chambers of the Yugoslav Parliament were
constituted for
the new session. The Chamber of Citizens verified 119 out of 138 deputy
mandates,
and Chamber of Republics 39 out of 40 mandates.
In both chambers of the Federal Parliament the representatives of
Milosevic's left
coalition have the majority. This was clear from the start, and even DOS
representatives agreed to it.
Still, Milosevic's obvious presence in Yugoslav capital and appearance
on TV,
putting the end to rumors and wild guesses as to his whereabouts and
intentions, came
as a shock to DOS leaders and their supporters, who had been convinced
that
ex-Yugoslav president had long since left Belgrade, if not indeed the
country. That,
coupled with the fact that a leftist government might be formed soon, is
casting a
shadow on DOS's present advantage.
Zoran Djindjic, DOS campaign manager, gave a statement to the press
immediately
after Milosevic's address on Friday, saying that Slobodan Milosevic is
just preparing a
blow from the back and intends to consolidate the police forces, so he
could come
back on scene as a tough hand. Obviously afraid that someone or
something can still
endanger their "democratic revolution", Djindjic finished rather
paranoically: "I do
not trust Milosevic!"
Still, if Milosevic is not to be trusted, why not accept the
assurances and
congratulations offered to Kostunica by thehighest representatives of
the army and
police? It seems that DOS's fear of one man and his presence is so
great, that not
even the fact that those institutions didn't react during Thursday's
vandalistic
demonstrations can reassure the Serbian opposition.
Perhaps the DOS is simply being aware of its own fragility: from the
very beginning,
it has been highly dependent on foreign support and money. This ad hoc
alliance of
some 18 parties has only one common ground and program - to oust
Milosevic.
Not to forget that the DOS candidate, newly-proclaimed FRY president
Kostunica,
is a leader of a small party with low support from the people, and a man
of low
significance. The person running the show for this particular puppet on
a string is
Zoran Djindjic, who in his own turn is a puppet of the administration in
Washington.
Not to forget that over 2 million Yugoslav citizens voted against
Kostunica precisely
for the above mentioned reasons, knowing who the powers behind DOS are
and not
wanting to be a part of "Pax Americana".
"Slobodan Milosevic had very little or no chance at all" said Petar
Raskov (70), a
Federal court judge on pension, underlining that pressure exercised on
Serbia, of
power, money and media combined, was too heavy for Serbian people not to
yield.
"Milosevic was the only man to preserve the FRY resistance to NATO's
"Drang nach
Osten" (Push to the East) strategy. I couldn't vote for NATO, not even
if it puts on a
disguise of Serbian nationalist with anti-American policy".
As for those who did - a gun at man's temple can be a good incentive,
and endlessly
repeated "international community" treats to Serbian people that as long
as Milosevic
is Yugoslav president, sanctions against their country won't be lifted,
obviously
influenced the ultimate decision, especially with the young people.
"I didn't vote for Kostunica, he is nobody!" says Milan Ristic (24), a
student from
Belgrade. "But his victory might bring better days for Yugoslavia. I
voted against
Milosevic, because the whole world was against him!"
Therefore, after plowing Yugoslav land with bombs and missiles in
Spring of 1999,
after fertilizing it for over a year with media-launched lies and money,
Military
Alliance of the West is getting ready to pick up the harvest.
Tanja Djurovic is a Junge Welt correspondent from Belgrade.
JOURNAL DE BELGRADE – VENDREDI 6 octobre, 15 heures.
Michel Collon
Les 8 questions du moment
Je vais essayer de répondre aux 8 questions qui ressortent des
événements:
La TV a-t-elle tout montré?
Est-on en présence d'une stratégie de coup d'Etat bien preparé?
Que recherchent les Etats-Unis dans la situation actuelle?
A-t-on vote pour Kostunica ou contre Milosevic?
Pourquoi le pouvoir n'a-t-il senti venir sa défaite?
Les élections ont-elles été régulières?
Ceux qui soutiennent Kostunica se sont-ils pour autant rallies aux
Etats-Unis?
Que va-t-il se passer?
La TV a-t-elle tout montré? Rien à redire sur les images présentées par
la
BBC ou CNN. Il y avait effectivement une foule énorme, les policiers ont
opposé une résistance très faible et ont surtout cherche à éviter des
affrontements graves. Mais ce que je n'ai pas vu exposé dans ces chaînes
occidentales, c'est le saccage du siège du parti socialiste (alors que
Kostunica avait annoncé qu'il n'y aurait pas de revanchisme envers les
partis), et de bâtiments de diverses entreprises publiques. Ni les
vitrines
brisées d'un certain nombre de magasins du centre, qui ont ensuite été
pillés. J'ai personnellement vu des manifestants quittant le centre par
le
pont sur la Sava et emportant sur leurs épaules des ordinateurs voles.
Dans
le centre aussi, des non-manifestants déploraient qu'on détruise des
biens
de la voie publique: "C'est nous qui paierons". Mais le plus important
est
que l'opposition a réussi une mobilisation énorme et que le pouvoir n'a
pu
y opposer de contre-mobilisation.
Stratégie de coup d'Etat soigneusement préparée? Les manifestants
étaient
guidés par quelques centaines de jeunes gens fort actifs, venus surtout
de
Cacak, Kragujevac et autrès place-fortes de l'opposition (Belgrade est
plus
tiède). On constate qu'ils ont procède méthodiquement pour prendre le
contrôle de toute une série d'objectifs-clés. Le Parlement d'abord. Un
symbole évidemment. Encore doit-on remarquer que Monsieur Kostunica,
toujours presenté comme un constitutionnaliste et légaliste convaincu,
s'en
est donc pris à ce parlement au moment où celui-ci vient d'être élu et
que
l'opposition ne conteste pas les résultats des élections parlementaires.
Que veulent donc les USA? Nous y venons bientôt.
La TV RTS ensuite. Comme en Roumanie en 89 et dans chaque coup
d'Etat,
contrôler les grands médias et priver l'adversaire du droit de
réponse semble
devenu l'objectif numéro 1. Ont suivi les autrès médias et
certains bâtiments
d'entreprises publiques.
Ce caractère systématique et bien planifie fait rappeler que
le
chef réel de
l'opposition, Zoran Djindjic, avait déclaré il y a quelques
mois,
à la TV grecque que
s'ils ne gagnaient pas les élections, ils s'en prendraient au
parlement. Pas
nouveau, en 92, a Moscou, Elstine soutenu par les Etats-Unis,
avait carrément fait
incendier le parlement et fait tuer de nombreux députés qui
lui
résistaient.
Une autre dirigeante de l'opposition, Madame Pesic avait,
elle,
évoqué la nécessité
de "créer un syndrome de Bucarest'. Ces choses-là se préparent
longtemps à
l'avance.
Pourquoi les Etats-Unis poussent-ils encore a l'épreuve de force?
Pourquoi
cette recherche de l'affrontement total? Pourquoi refusent-ils tout
compromis négocié qui permettrait d'écarter le risque d'un bain de sang?
Parce qu'ils savent que l'opposition qu'ils sont en train d'amener au
pouvoir souffre de deux faiblesses graves, qui devraient lui être
fatales
sans qu'il faille attendre de longues années pour le constater. Quelle
sont
ces faiblesses?
Premièrement, la coalition DOS est complètement hétéroclite. 19 partis
qui
n'ont en commun que la volonté d'arriver au pouvoir et l'appétit envers
les
dollars de Washington. Dans cette coalition, on trouve en effet des gens
qui se sont disputes a mort pendant de longues années (Djindjic avait
exclu
Kostunica et bien d'autrès), des monarchistes et des republicains, des
unitaristes nationalistes serbes et des separatistes (du Sandjak et de
la
Voivodine) dont les programmes sont diametralement opposes. Une fois au
pouvoir, il est clair que recommenceront de plus belle les dechirements
et
les conflits d'interets. Il sera absolument impossible de realiser les
programmes de tous ces partis. La magie de "l'unite derriere Kostunica"
fera certainement long feu.
D'autant que, et c'est le deuxième facteur, DOS décevra forcement ses
electeurs. Ceux-ci, epuises financierement et moralement par dix années
de
sanctions aspirent a "vivre normalement" (c'est l'idee qui m'a ete le
plus
souvent exprimee par les manifestants d'hier que j'ai interroges), donc
a
rattraper un niveau de vie plus proche de l'Ouest. Mais, comme nous
l'avons
deja explique dans un precedent article, le programme « G-17 » de
l'opposition prevoit la liquidation des protections sociales et des
entreprises publiques, des licenciements massifs et carte blanche pour
les
multinationales afin de racheter les entreprises qui les interessent et
d'exploiter plus efficacement les travailleurs. Quelques uns vivront
mieux,
beaucoup vivront plus mal.
De sorte que, tot ou tard, Kostunica decevra et le souffle de l'espoir
retombera. Y aura-t-il alors une alternative? Les partis de gauche et
defenseurs de l'independance du pays pourraient-ils revenir au pouvoir
(a
condition, nous le verrons plus loin d'effectuer certains examens de
conscience) comme cela devrait etre le cas aux prochaines élections de
trois pays voisins: Macedoine, Republique Serbe de Bosnie et Roumanie?
C'est justement pour eviter cette possibilite de retour, legitime, au
pouvoir, lors des élections suivantes, que les Etats-Unis s'acharnent a
briser l'appareil gouvernemental actuel et celui des partis de gauche de
Yougoslavie.
En Macedoine, aux dernieres élections , le candidat de gauche était en
tete, les incidents violents se sont multiplies au point que le leader
de
la gauche s'est finalement desiste dans la crainte d'affrontements très
violents. Il faut dire que les troupes americaines et autrès occupent le
pays et que leur intervention pour arreter la gauche ne faisait aucun
doute. Ajoutons que, pour l'Ouest qui se dit si soucieux de la légalité,
ces élections-la ont ete "parfaites".
4. A-t-on vote pour Kostunica ou contre Milosevic? La bonne reponse est
la
seconde selon beaucoup de gens avec qui j'ai parle. Malgre dix ans de
pouvoir, Milosevic avait acquis un grand prestige durant la guerre en
resistant fermement a l'Otan, ce qui correspondait a la volonté de tout
son
peuple. Mais le parti au pouvoir a gaspille ses chances en commettant
deux
fautes majeures.
D'abord, il a permis, voire favorise la croissance de l'inegalite
sociale.
Oui, les sanctions (l'embargo) sont un crime de l'Ouest qui fait
souffrir
cruellement la population. Mais celle-ci a vu aussi se developper sous
ses
yeux certaines fortunes insolentes. Il n'est pas exact de pretendre,
comme
on dit dans les médias occidentaux, que « toute la nomenklatura vit dans
le
luxe ». Il m'est arrive d'entrer dans les appartements prives de
certains
cadres intermédiaires de ministeres; ils étaient tout aussi modestes que
ceux de leurs voisins, dans des cites d'immeubles sociaux qui n'avaient
vraiment rien de luxueux. Neanmoins, il y a aussi, dans le business et
dans
les trafics, des trains de vie scandaleux. Pour garder son soutien, le
regime aurait du combattre ces grosses fortunes et consacrer davantage
d'efforts au social.
Ensuite, la stratégie de communication aussi bien des dirigeants que des
médias publics n'a pas ete fructueuse. Il circulait de nombreuses
plaisanteries sur la television RTS et les messages d'en haut ont perdu
leur crédibilite a force de repeter que tout allait bien.
5. Pourquoi Milosevic ne l'a-t-il pas senti venir? Comment se fait-il
que
Milosevic ait décide de convoquer lui-meme des élections anticipees? Et
que, jusqu'a la derniere minute, les partis au pouvoir se montraient
surs
de l'emporter, de sorte qu'ils ont ete pris au depourvu quand ils ont du
"gerer" leur defaite?
La reponse tient dans le poids d'un certain bureaucratisme. On trouve
parmi
les fonctionnaires et les responsables politiques beaucoup de gens très
devoues et pleins d'enthousiasme pour défendre leur pays. On trouve
aussi
un certain nombre de bureaucrates qui ne se fatiguent pas beaucoup pour
chercher des solutions aux problèmes. Et on a l'impression très nette
que
les rapports qu'ils envoient "en-haut" sont du genre "Tout va très bien
madame la marquise". Le pouvoir ne s'est pas rendu compte qu'il avait
perdu
une grande partie de sa popularite de la guerre. Il a cru que les
élections
étaient gagnées d'avance. E sa stratégie de campagne n'a pas ete bonne:
Milosevic absent, des discours autosatisfaits sur la reconstruction qui
est
reelle, mais aussi la negation du problème social et un message
systematique du genre "tout ira très bien" qui a perdu sa crédibilite .
6. Les élections ont-elle ete regulieres? Bien sur, cette tentative
d'analyse des faiblesses des partis en place n'enleve rien au constat
que
nous avons deja fait. Oui, les élections n'ont pas ete regulieres. Quand
on
bombarde un peuple, qu'on detruit ses usines, ses installations civiles
d'electricite et de chauffage, ses routes et ses ponts, quand on lui
jette
des armes horribles comme les bombes a fragmentation et a l'uranium,
quand
on soumet sa population a un chantage repugnant "Votez pour les partis
pro-occidentaux ou vous continuerez a crever de faim", quand on deverse
des
centaines de millions de dollars pour aider certains partis politiques a
tromper les gens grace a des conseillers specialises en campagnes
mensongeres aux methodes scientifiques, alors il faut bien conclure que
ces
élections sont regulieres comme Jamie Shea est un homme objectif et
sincere.
7. Ceux qui soutiennent Kostunica se sont-ils pour autant rallies aux
Etats-Unis? J'ai discute avec des partisans de Kostunica. C'est
instructif.
Comme ces partis d'opposition sont finances – grassement – par
Washington,
on pourrait croire que les partisans de Kostunica sont automatiquement
partisans des Etats-Unis.
Faux. Un proverbe, que les Serbes s'appliquent avec auto-derision a
eux-memes, indique: "Si vous avez deux Serbes, vous avez trois
opinions."
Plusieurs manifestants m'ont dit spontanement "Nous ne sommes pas
l'Otan".
Un coiffeur, d'origine francaise, m'ayant reconnu dans la rue (suite a
des
apparitions televisees) est venu spontanement me signaler qu'il
appreciait
beaucoup mes critiques contre l'Otan, mais que j'avais tort de mettre
les
partis de l'opposition dans le meme sac. "Nous on deteste les
Americains,
on sait très bien ce qu'ils sont et leurs interets".
"Mais on ne veut plus de Milosevic, on veut vivre normalement sans
sanctions et comme vous autrès a l'Ouest." Comme les chomeurs et les SDF
de
l'Ouest ou comme les richards de l'Ouest? Ne se rend-il pas compte que
les
multinationales occidentales n'apportreront pas ici la prosperite mais
une
exploitation plus impitoyable?
Non, ce discours-la, pour l'instant, ils ne veulent pas l'entendre:
"Vous
avez peut-etre raison, mais il faut essayer, on veut du changement, du
changement! Et si ces nouveaux dirigeants ne tiennent pas leurs
promesses,
on changera de nouveau!" Ca, c'est la grande illusion de croire que
l'Otan
permettra une "marche arriere", mais voila l'etat d'esprit ici
actuellement.
Un autre element d'appreciation est que les strateges de la campagne
electorale de DOS ont reussi a faire passer une idee curieuse, mais
efficace: Milosevic serait en fait l'homme des Etats-Unis, il leur
servirait a maintenir leur emprise. Ca ne tient pas debout – pourquoi
les
Etats-Unis feraient tout pour eliminer celui qui leur servirait tant –
mais
ca marche aupres de certains. En fait, c'est une methode classique de
pub:
celui qui vole, crie "au voleur". Celui qui est paye par les Americains,
fait semblant de crier "A bas les Etats-Unis!"
8. Que va-t-il se passer? Cette apres-midi, une vie plus ou moins
normale a
repris dans les rues, encore que les commerces restent fermes. Mais
l'opposition veut maintenir ses troupes dans le centre, pour eviter
toute
intervention policiere de reprise en mains. Elle annonce une
mobilisation
plus importante encore.
D'une part, l'opposition DOS cherche a conclure une alliance au
parlement
en faisant eclater le parti montenegrin de Bulatovic et en y trouvant
les
voix qui leur manquent pour acquerir la majorite. On peut etre certain
que
les dollars de Washington servent d'appat. De l'autre cote, le
gouvernement
cherche la parade sans l'avoir trouve. Il affirme ne pas vouloir lancer
l'armée pour eviter un bain de sang, il demande que la légalité soit
respectee. Il s'efforce de retrouver un média qui lui permette de faire
passer son message. Mais sa stratégie de communication s'avere toujours
aussi lente et chaotique. On attend en vain une prise de position
officielle. Ilosevic pourrait prononcer un discours... On attend. A
bientot!
JOURNAL DE BELGRADE - Samedi 7 octobre, 12 heures
Ce sont les douze mois à venir
qui décideront du sort de la Yougoslavie
MICHEL COLLON
Les nouvelles importantes se sont succédé hier soir. Celle dont parlent
tous les médias
internationaux. Milosevic a reconnu la victoire de Kostunica aux
présidentielles.
Et celle dont ils ne parlent pas mais qui pourrait s'avérer plus
importante encore pour
les huit mois cruciaux qui viennent. La tentative de l'opposition de
débaucher certains
parlementaires monténégrins pour former une majorité gouvernementale de
rechange a échoué.
Sous réserve de confirmation, le prochain gouvernement yougoslave
devrait donc etre
formé du SPS, le parti de Milosevic, son allié traditionnel YUL et les
députés
monténegrins du SNP de Momir Bulatovic. Se retrouverait-on alors dans
une
situation de double pouvoir? Non, car celui du président est moins
important que celui
du gouvernement yougoslave, et moins important encore que celui du
gouvernement
serbe qui dispose de la majorité des budgets.
Kostunica président et Milosevic premier ministre?
Kostunica président et Milosevic premier ministre? Ce scénario
surréaliste que nous
avions envisagé il y a quelques jours, ce scénario serait le cauchemar
de Washington.
Et c'est pourquoi l'Óuest est en train de tout faire pour éliminer
définitivement de la
vie politique Milosevic et son parti.
Depuis Belgrade, j'ai regardé la BBC, CNN et une télé allemande. Toutes
présentaient
une image caricaturale: un peuple entier uni contre un dictateur. La
réalité est
différente. Milosevic conserve un soutien important - l'opposition ne
conteste pas les
résultats des élections parlementaires - et on se trouve plutot face à
un pays divisé en
deux camps, après des mois de pressions et de campagnes extérieures
énormes.
Comme je l'ai écrit hier, les dirigeants de l'opposition ont cherché à
créer un
"syndrome de Bucarest". Milosevic a tout fait pour éviter d'entrer dans
ce piège, il a
attendu dans une guerre d'usure, une guerre des nerfs, comme lors de
précédents
affrontements déclenchés par l'opposition (91 et 96-97) auxquels il
avait survécu:
"En tout cas, nous ne voulions pas envoyer l'armée et provoquer un bain
de sang",
m'ont déclaré des responsables gouvernementaux.
N'aurait-il pas mieux valu reconnaître de suite la victoire de
Kostunica? Beaucoup,
même dans son camp, le pensent: "Les gens ont cru qu'íl allait tenter de
manoeuvrer
et n'ont pas aimé ca", m'explique Ivana, qui a pourtant voté Milosevic.
Mais au camp Kostunica, on peut adresser une autre question: pourquoi
ont-ils refusé
le second tour qu'il semblait assuré de gagner? Nous pensons que
Washington et les
dirigeants de l'opposition ont cherché à provoquer le "syndrome
Bucarest" pour
tenter déliminer définitivement Milosevic de la scène politique.
Mais s'agit-il seulement de Milosevic? Non. Il s'agit de tout un courant
de la société
yougoslave qui résiste à la prise de contrôle par les multinationales.
Le 17 novembre
98, l'agence officielle britannique Reuter mentionnait un sondage auprès
de 300
sociétés selon lequel "la privatisation ne suscite pas l'enthousiasme en
Serbie, les
travailleurs craignent des licenciements massifs. Aucune compagnie n'a
encore été
privatisée depuis la nouvelle loi de privatisation adoptée il y a un
mois."
En outre, la volonté d'éliminer Milosevic ne concerne pas seulement la
Yougoslavie.
Pourquoi Milosevic est-il la bête noire de Washington?
"Parce qu'il symbolise la résistance au Nouvel Ordre Mondial et qu'il
pourrait donner
de mauvaises idées à d'autres forces dans les Balkans, m'explique
Ljliljana,
fonctionnaire dans un ministère. Aux yeux de Washington, Milosevic est
un virus
dangereux qui peut contaminer les Balkans."
Clinton et la démonisation des Serbes
A présent, Kostunica se trouve, lui, face à deux problèmes. L'un
immédiat: l'incendie
du parlement n'a pas été approuvée y compris parmi ses propres
supporters. "Même
l'Otan avait épargné ce symbole, s'indigne-t-on ici. Hitler avait
incendié le Reichstag
comme provocation avant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Et la télévision RTS
avait été
bombardée par l'Otan: 16 victimes. Les traces sont encore fraiches.
C'est indigne."
Deuxième problème: les encombrantes félicitations des Etats-Unis. Hier
soir,
j'entendais le discours de Bill Clinton. En substance: ""Cette victoire,
c?est la notre,
c'est la consécration du combat des Etats-Unis depuis dix ans. Nous
avons empêché
Milosevic de continuer à attaquer la Croatie, la Bosnie et d'autres
pays. Avec la
manifestation de Belgrade, nous avons mis fin à la menace d'un homme qui
avait fait
des centaines de milliers de victimes."
Ah oui? Milosevic aurait tué tant de gens? A lui tout seul? Clinton peut
être assuré
qu'aucun Serbe ne pense ainsi. Pratiquement tous continuent à penser que
leur pays a
été attaqué par les grandes puissances qui ont soutenu des extrémistes
comme
Tudjman et Izetbegovic et se sont montrés injustes envers les Serbes.
Certains - y
compris parmi les électeurs de l'opposition - reprochent même à
Milosevic de ne pas
avoir été assez ferme jusqu'au bout.
Quoi qu'il en soit, ce discours de Clinton poursuit la démonisation des
Serbes
présentés comme des monstres car il est évident que s'il y a "des
centaines de milliers
de victimes", un grand nombre de Serbes sont criminels, et la chasse aux
sorcières va
commencer avec toute la sélectivité et l'arbitraire dont Washington est
capable.
En outre, Washington ne compte nullement rendre justice aux Serbes, par
exemple au
Kosovo. Bernard Kouchner vient d'annoncer qu'il faudrait rester la-bas
une
géneration et que les troupes américaines y resteraient "sans doute dix
ans."(Washington Times, 30 septembre)
Meme avec Kostunica, les Serbes ne verraient pas la couleur de la paix
car les
Etats-Unis ont besoin d'une situation de conflit "de basse intensité"
permanente.
Une situation qui leur permette de maintenir la tension dans une région,
et la pression
contre un pays. Croire que les USA sont au Kosovo pour rétablir la paix
et aider les
Albanais, c'est comme croire qu'Hitler était allé occuper la
Tchéquoslovaquie pour
l'amour des minorités sudètes allemandes. Prétextes, prétextes... Tout
ce qui compte
pour les grandes puissances, c'est d'occuper des régions stratégiques.
Les douze mois qui viennent, avant les élections en Serbie, seront
décisives. La
Yougoslavie deviendra-t-elle ou non une colonie du FMI et de l?Otan?
S'ils veulent
renverser la tendance électorale actuelle - surtout dans la jeunesse -
Milosevic et ses
alliés auront à mener une politique plus sociale encore, une lutte plus
ferme contre les
privilèges. Et une stratégie de communication plus efficace, notamment
envers les
jeunes. Mais les forces progressistes du monde entier auront aussi un
rôle à jouer pour
démasquer l'action de Washington derrière des élections pas vraiment
libres.
Michel Collon
Les 8 questions du moment
Je vais essayer de répondre aux 8 questions qui ressortent des
événements:
La TV a-t-elle tout montré?
Est-on en présence d'une stratégie de coup d'Etat bien preparé?
Que recherchent les Etats-Unis dans la situation actuelle?
A-t-on vote pour Kostunica ou contre Milosevic?
Pourquoi le pouvoir n'a-t-il senti venir sa défaite?
Les élections ont-elles été régulières?
Ceux qui soutiennent Kostunica se sont-ils pour autant rallies aux
Etats-Unis?
Que va-t-il se passer?
La TV a-t-elle tout montré? Rien à redire sur les images présentées par
la
BBC ou CNN. Il y avait effectivement une foule énorme, les policiers ont
opposé une résistance très faible et ont surtout cherche à éviter des
affrontements graves. Mais ce que je n'ai pas vu exposé dans ces chaînes
occidentales, c'est le saccage du siège du parti socialiste (alors que
Kostunica avait annoncé qu'il n'y aurait pas de revanchisme envers les
partis), et de bâtiments de diverses entreprises publiques. Ni les
vitrines
brisées d'un certain nombre de magasins du centre, qui ont ensuite été
pillés. J'ai personnellement vu des manifestants quittant le centre par
le
pont sur la Sava et emportant sur leurs épaules des ordinateurs voles.
Dans
le centre aussi, des non-manifestants déploraient qu'on détruise des
biens
de la voie publique: "C'est nous qui paierons". Mais le plus important
est
que l'opposition a réussi une mobilisation énorme et que le pouvoir n'a
pu
y opposer de contre-mobilisation.
Stratégie de coup d'Etat soigneusement préparée? Les manifestants
étaient
guidés par quelques centaines de jeunes gens fort actifs, venus surtout
de
Cacak, Kragujevac et autrès place-fortes de l'opposition (Belgrade est
plus
tiède). On constate qu'ils ont procède méthodiquement pour prendre le
contrôle de toute une série d'objectifs-clés. Le Parlement d'abord. Un
symbole évidemment. Encore doit-on remarquer que Monsieur Kostunica,
toujours presenté comme un constitutionnaliste et légaliste convaincu,
s'en
est donc pris à ce parlement au moment où celui-ci vient d'être élu et
que
l'opposition ne conteste pas les résultats des élections parlementaires.
Que veulent donc les USA? Nous y venons bientôt.
La TV RTS ensuite. Comme en Roumanie en 89 et dans chaque coup
d'Etat,
contrôler les grands médias et priver l'adversaire du droit de
réponse semble
devenu l'objectif numéro 1. Ont suivi les autrès médias et
certains bâtiments
d'entreprises publiques.
Ce caractère systématique et bien planifie fait rappeler que
le
chef réel de
l'opposition, Zoran Djindjic, avait déclaré il y a quelques
mois,
à la TV grecque que
s'ils ne gagnaient pas les élections, ils s'en prendraient au
parlement. Pas
nouveau, en 92, a Moscou, Elstine soutenu par les Etats-Unis,
avait carrément fait
incendier le parlement et fait tuer de nombreux députés qui
lui
résistaient.
Une autre dirigeante de l'opposition, Madame Pesic avait,
elle,
évoqué la nécessité
de "créer un syndrome de Bucarest'. Ces choses-là se préparent
longtemps à
l'avance.
Pourquoi les Etats-Unis poussent-ils encore a l'épreuve de force?
Pourquoi
cette recherche de l'affrontement total? Pourquoi refusent-ils tout
compromis négocié qui permettrait d'écarter le risque d'un bain de sang?
Parce qu'ils savent que l'opposition qu'ils sont en train d'amener au
pouvoir souffre de deux faiblesses graves, qui devraient lui être
fatales
sans qu'il faille attendre de longues années pour le constater. Quelle
sont
ces faiblesses?
Premièrement, la coalition DOS est complètement hétéroclite. 19 partis
qui
n'ont en commun que la volonté d'arriver au pouvoir et l'appétit envers
les
dollars de Washington. Dans cette coalition, on trouve en effet des gens
qui se sont disputes a mort pendant de longues années (Djindjic avait
exclu
Kostunica et bien d'autrès), des monarchistes et des republicains, des
unitaristes nationalistes serbes et des separatistes (du Sandjak et de
la
Voivodine) dont les programmes sont diametralement opposes. Une fois au
pouvoir, il est clair que recommenceront de plus belle les dechirements
et
les conflits d'interets. Il sera absolument impossible de realiser les
programmes de tous ces partis. La magie de "l'unite derriere Kostunica"
fera certainement long feu.
D'autant que, et c'est le deuxième facteur, DOS décevra forcement ses
electeurs. Ceux-ci, epuises financierement et moralement par dix années
de
sanctions aspirent a "vivre normalement" (c'est l'idee qui m'a ete le
plus
souvent exprimee par les manifestants d'hier que j'ai interroges), donc
a
rattraper un niveau de vie plus proche de l'Ouest. Mais, comme nous
l'avons
deja explique dans un precedent article, le programme « G-17 » de
l'opposition prevoit la liquidation des protections sociales et des
entreprises publiques, des licenciements massifs et carte blanche pour
les
multinationales afin de racheter les entreprises qui les interessent et
d'exploiter plus efficacement les travailleurs. Quelques uns vivront
mieux,
beaucoup vivront plus mal.
De sorte que, tot ou tard, Kostunica decevra et le souffle de l'espoir
retombera. Y aura-t-il alors une alternative? Les partis de gauche et
defenseurs de l'independance du pays pourraient-ils revenir au pouvoir
(a
condition, nous le verrons plus loin d'effectuer certains examens de
conscience) comme cela devrait etre le cas aux prochaines élections de
trois pays voisins: Macedoine, Republique Serbe de Bosnie et Roumanie?
C'est justement pour eviter cette possibilite de retour, legitime, au
pouvoir, lors des élections suivantes, que les Etats-Unis s'acharnent a
briser l'appareil gouvernemental actuel et celui des partis de gauche de
Yougoslavie.
En Macedoine, aux dernieres élections , le candidat de gauche était en
tete, les incidents violents se sont multiplies au point que le leader
de
la gauche s'est finalement desiste dans la crainte d'affrontements très
violents. Il faut dire que les troupes americaines et autrès occupent le
pays et que leur intervention pour arreter la gauche ne faisait aucun
doute. Ajoutons que, pour l'Ouest qui se dit si soucieux de la légalité,
ces élections-la ont ete "parfaites".
4. A-t-on vote pour Kostunica ou contre Milosevic? La bonne reponse est
la
seconde selon beaucoup de gens avec qui j'ai parle. Malgre dix ans de
pouvoir, Milosevic avait acquis un grand prestige durant la guerre en
resistant fermement a l'Otan, ce qui correspondait a la volonté de tout
son
peuple. Mais le parti au pouvoir a gaspille ses chances en commettant
deux
fautes majeures.
D'abord, il a permis, voire favorise la croissance de l'inegalite
sociale.
Oui, les sanctions (l'embargo) sont un crime de l'Ouest qui fait
souffrir
cruellement la population. Mais celle-ci a vu aussi se developper sous
ses
yeux certaines fortunes insolentes. Il n'est pas exact de pretendre,
comme
on dit dans les médias occidentaux, que « toute la nomenklatura vit dans
le
luxe ». Il m'est arrive d'entrer dans les appartements prives de
certains
cadres intermédiaires de ministeres; ils étaient tout aussi modestes que
ceux de leurs voisins, dans des cites d'immeubles sociaux qui n'avaient
vraiment rien de luxueux. Neanmoins, il y a aussi, dans le business et
dans
les trafics, des trains de vie scandaleux. Pour garder son soutien, le
regime aurait du combattre ces grosses fortunes et consacrer davantage
d'efforts au social.
Ensuite, la stratégie de communication aussi bien des dirigeants que des
médias publics n'a pas ete fructueuse. Il circulait de nombreuses
plaisanteries sur la television RTS et les messages d'en haut ont perdu
leur crédibilite a force de repeter que tout allait bien.
5. Pourquoi Milosevic ne l'a-t-il pas senti venir? Comment se fait-il
que
Milosevic ait décide de convoquer lui-meme des élections anticipees? Et
que, jusqu'a la derniere minute, les partis au pouvoir se montraient
surs
de l'emporter, de sorte qu'ils ont ete pris au depourvu quand ils ont du
"gerer" leur defaite?
La reponse tient dans le poids d'un certain bureaucratisme. On trouve
parmi
les fonctionnaires et les responsables politiques beaucoup de gens très
devoues et pleins d'enthousiasme pour défendre leur pays. On trouve
aussi
un certain nombre de bureaucrates qui ne se fatiguent pas beaucoup pour
chercher des solutions aux problèmes. Et on a l'impression très nette
que
les rapports qu'ils envoient "en-haut" sont du genre "Tout va très bien
madame la marquise". Le pouvoir ne s'est pas rendu compte qu'il avait
perdu
une grande partie de sa popularite de la guerre. Il a cru que les
élections
étaient gagnées d'avance. E sa stratégie de campagne n'a pas ete bonne:
Milosevic absent, des discours autosatisfaits sur la reconstruction qui
est
reelle, mais aussi la negation du problème social et un message
systematique du genre "tout ira très bien" qui a perdu sa crédibilite .
6. Les élections ont-elle ete regulieres? Bien sur, cette tentative
d'analyse des faiblesses des partis en place n'enleve rien au constat
que
nous avons deja fait. Oui, les élections n'ont pas ete regulieres. Quand
on
bombarde un peuple, qu'on detruit ses usines, ses installations civiles
d'electricite et de chauffage, ses routes et ses ponts, quand on lui
jette
des armes horribles comme les bombes a fragmentation et a l'uranium,
quand
on soumet sa population a un chantage repugnant "Votez pour les partis
pro-occidentaux ou vous continuerez a crever de faim", quand on deverse
des
centaines de millions de dollars pour aider certains partis politiques a
tromper les gens grace a des conseillers specialises en campagnes
mensongeres aux methodes scientifiques, alors il faut bien conclure que
ces
élections sont regulieres comme Jamie Shea est un homme objectif et
sincere.
7. Ceux qui soutiennent Kostunica se sont-ils pour autant rallies aux
Etats-Unis? J'ai discute avec des partisans de Kostunica. C'est
instructif.
Comme ces partis d'opposition sont finances – grassement – par
Washington,
on pourrait croire que les partisans de Kostunica sont automatiquement
partisans des Etats-Unis.
Faux. Un proverbe, que les Serbes s'appliquent avec auto-derision a
eux-memes, indique: "Si vous avez deux Serbes, vous avez trois
opinions."
Plusieurs manifestants m'ont dit spontanement "Nous ne sommes pas
l'Otan".
Un coiffeur, d'origine francaise, m'ayant reconnu dans la rue (suite a
des
apparitions televisees) est venu spontanement me signaler qu'il
appreciait
beaucoup mes critiques contre l'Otan, mais que j'avais tort de mettre
les
partis de l'opposition dans le meme sac. "Nous on deteste les
Americains,
on sait très bien ce qu'ils sont et leurs interets".
"Mais on ne veut plus de Milosevic, on veut vivre normalement sans
sanctions et comme vous autrès a l'Ouest." Comme les chomeurs et les SDF
de
l'Ouest ou comme les richards de l'Ouest? Ne se rend-il pas compte que
les
multinationales occidentales n'apportreront pas ici la prosperite mais
une
exploitation plus impitoyable?
Non, ce discours-la, pour l'instant, ils ne veulent pas l'entendre:
"Vous
avez peut-etre raison, mais il faut essayer, on veut du changement, du
changement! Et si ces nouveaux dirigeants ne tiennent pas leurs
promesses,
on changera de nouveau!" Ca, c'est la grande illusion de croire que
l'Otan
permettra une "marche arriere", mais voila l'etat d'esprit ici
actuellement.
Un autre element d'appreciation est que les strateges de la campagne
electorale de DOS ont reussi a faire passer une idee curieuse, mais
efficace: Milosevic serait en fait l'homme des Etats-Unis, il leur
servirait a maintenir leur emprise. Ca ne tient pas debout – pourquoi
les
Etats-Unis feraient tout pour eliminer celui qui leur servirait tant –
mais
ca marche aupres de certains. En fait, c'est une methode classique de
pub:
celui qui vole, crie "au voleur". Celui qui est paye par les Americains,
fait semblant de crier "A bas les Etats-Unis!"
8. Que va-t-il se passer? Cette apres-midi, une vie plus ou moins
normale a
repris dans les rues, encore que les commerces restent fermes. Mais
l'opposition veut maintenir ses troupes dans le centre, pour eviter
toute
intervention policiere de reprise en mains. Elle annonce une
mobilisation
plus importante encore.
D'une part, l'opposition DOS cherche a conclure une alliance au
parlement
en faisant eclater le parti montenegrin de Bulatovic et en y trouvant
les
voix qui leur manquent pour acquerir la majorite. On peut etre certain
que
les dollars de Washington servent d'appat. De l'autre cote, le
gouvernement
cherche la parade sans l'avoir trouve. Il affirme ne pas vouloir lancer
l'armée pour eviter un bain de sang, il demande que la légalité soit
respectee. Il s'efforce de retrouver un média qui lui permette de faire
passer son message. Mais sa stratégie de communication s'avere toujours
aussi lente et chaotique. On attend en vain une prise de position
officielle. Ilosevic pourrait prononcer un discours... On attend. A
bientot!
JOURNAL DE BELGRADE - Samedi 7 octobre, 12 heures
Ce sont les douze mois à venir
qui décideront du sort de la Yougoslavie
MICHEL COLLON
Les nouvelles importantes se sont succédé hier soir. Celle dont parlent
tous les médias
internationaux. Milosevic a reconnu la victoire de Kostunica aux
présidentielles.
Et celle dont ils ne parlent pas mais qui pourrait s'avérer plus
importante encore pour
les huit mois cruciaux qui viennent. La tentative de l'opposition de
débaucher certains
parlementaires monténégrins pour former une majorité gouvernementale de
rechange a échoué.
Sous réserve de confirmation, le prochain gouvernement yougoslave
devrait donc etre
formé du SPS, le parti de Milosevic, son allié traditionnel YUL et les
députés
monténegrins du SNP de Momir Bulatovic. Se retrouverait-on alors dans
une
situation de double pouvoir? Non, car celui du président est moins
important que celui
du gouvernement yougoslave, et moins important encore que celui du
gouvernement
serbe qui dispose de la majorité des budgets.
Kostunica président et Milosevic premier ministre?
Kostunica président et Milosevic premier ministre? Ce scénario
surréaliste que nous
avions envisagé il y a quelques jours, ce scénario serait le cauchemar
de Washington.
Et c'est pourquoi l'Óuest est en train de tout faire pour éliminer
définitivement de la
vie politique Milosevic et son parti.
Depuis Belgrade, j'ai regardé la BBC, CNN et une télé allemande. Toutes
présentaient
une image caricaturale: un peuple entier uni contre un dictateur. La
réalité est
différente. Milosevic conserve un soutien important - l'opposition ne
conteste pas les
résultats des élections parlementaires - et on se trouve plutot face à
un pays divisé en
deux camps, après des mois de pressions et de campagnes extérieures
énormes.
Comme je l'ai écrit hier, les dirigeants de l'opposition ont cherché à
créer un
"syndrome de Bucarest". Milosevic a tout fait pour éviter d'entrer dans
ce piège, il a
attendu dans une guerre d'usure, une guerre des nerfs, comme lors de
précédents
affrontements déclenchés par l'opposition (91 et 96-97) auxquels il
avait survécu:
"En tout cas, nous ne voulions pas envoyer l'armée et provoquer un bain
de sang",
m'ont déclaré des responsables gouvernementaux.
N'aurait-il pas mieux valu reconnaître de suite la victoire de
Kostunica? Beaucoup,
même dans son camp, le pensent: "Les gens ont cru qu'íl allait tenter de
manoeuvrer
et n'ont pas aimé ca", m'explique Ivana, qui a pourtant voté Milosevic.
Mais au camp Kostunica, on peut adresser une autre question: pourquoi
ont-ils refusé
le second tour qu'il semblait assuré de gagner? Nous pensons que
Washington et les
dirigeants de l'opposition ont cherché à provoquer le "syndrome
Bucarest" pour
tenter déliminer définitivement Milosevic de la scène politique.
Mais s'agit-il seulement de Milosevic? Non. Il s'agit de tout un courant
de la société
yougoslave qui résiste à la prise de contrôle par les multinationales.
Le 17 novembre
98, l'agence officielle britannique Reuter mentionnait un sondage auprès
de 300
sociétés selon lequel "la privatisation ne suscite pas l'enthousiasme en
Serbie, les
travailleurs craignent des licenciements massifs. Aucune compagnie n'a
encore été
privatisée depuis la nouvelle loi de privatisation adoptée il y a un
mois."
En outre, la volonté d'éliminer Milosevic ne concerne pas seulement la
Yougoslavie.
Pourquoi Milosevic est-il la bête noire de Washington?
"Parce qu'il symbolise la résistance au Nouvel Ordre Mondial et qu'il
pourrait donner
de mauvaises idées à d'autres forces dans les Balkans, m'explique
Ljliljana,
fonctionnaire dans un ministère. Aux yeux de Washington, Milosevic est
un virus
dangereux qui peut contaminer les Balkans."
Clinton et la démonisation des Serbes
A présent, Kostunica se trouve, lui, face à deux problèmes. L'un
immédiat: l'incendie
du parlement n'a pas été approuvée y compris parmi ses propres
supporters. "Même
l'Otan avait épargné ce symbole, s'indigne-t-on ici. Hitler avait
incendié le Reichstag
comme provocation avant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Et la télévision RTS
avait été
bombardée par l'Otan: 16 victimes. Les traces sont encore fraiches.
C'est indigne."
Deuxième problème: les encombrantes félicitations des Etats-Unis. Hier
soir,
j'entendais le discours de Bill Clinton. En substance: ""Cette victoire,
c?est la notre,
c'est la consécration du combat des Etats-Unis depuis dix ans. Nous
avons empêché
Milosevic de continuer à attaquer la Croatie, la Bosnie et d'autres
pays. Avec la
manifestation de Belgrade, nous avons mis fin à la menace d'un homme qui
avait fait
des centaines de milliers de victimes."
Ah oui? Milosevic aurait tué tant de gens? A lui tout seul? Clinton peut
être assuré
qu'aucun Serbe ne pense ainsi. Pratiquement tous continuent à penser que
leur pays a
été attaqué par les grandes puissances qui ont soutenu des extrémistes
comme
Tudjman et Izetbegovic et se sont montrés injustes envers les Serbes.
Certains - y
compris parmi les électeurs de l'opposition - reprochent même à
Milosevic de ne pas
avoir été assez ferme jusqu'au bout.
Quoi qu'il en soit, ce discours de Clinton poursuit la démonisation des
Serbes
présentés comme des monstres car il est évident que s'il y a "des
centaines de milliers
de victimes", un grand nombre de Serbes sont criminels, et la chasse aux
sorcières va
commencer avec toute la sélectivité et l'arbitraire dont Washington est
capable.
En outre, Washington ne compte nullement rendre justice aux Serbes, par
exemple au
Kosovo. Bernard Kouchner vient d'annoncer qu'il faudrait rester la-bas
une
géneration et que les troupes américaines y resteraient "sans doute dix
ans."(Washington Times, 30 septembre)
Meme avec Kostunica, les Serbes ne verraient pas la couleur de la paix
car les
Etats-Unis ont besoin d'une situation de conflit "de basse intensité"
permanente.
Une situation qui leur permette de maintenir la tension dans une région,
et la pression
contre un pays. Croire que les USA sont au Kosovo pour rétablir la paix
et aider les
Albanais, c'est comme croire qu'Hitler était allé occuper la
Tchéquoslovaquie pour
l'amour des minorités sudètes allemandes. Prétextes, prétextes... Tout
ce qui compte
pour les grandes puissances, c'est d'occuper des régions stratégiques.
Les douze mois qui viennent, avant les élections en Serbie, seront
décisives. La
Yougoslavie deviendra-t-elle ou non une colonie du FMI et de l?Otan?
S'ils veulent
renverser la tendance électorale actuelle - surtout dans la jeunesse -
Milosevic et ses
alliés auront à mener une politique plus sociale encore, une lutte plus
ferme contre les
privilèges. Et une stratégie de communication plus efficace, notamment
envers les
jeunes. Mais les forces progressistes du monde entier auront aussi un
rôle à jouer pour
démasquer l'action de Washington derrière des élections pas vraiment
libres.
Jugocoord su Telegram
Jugocoord su Facebook