(english / deutsch / italiano)

Il nuovo militarismo tedesco

0) LINKS
1) La deputata del partito Die Linke ANNETTE GROTH minacciata di espulsione dal partito per le sue posizioni antisioniste
2) MERKEL’S “HUN SPEECH” AGAINST RUSSIA (By Johannes Stern / WSWS, 19 November 2014)


=== 0: LINKS ===

Raccomandiamo la visione del seguente video:

*** ‘La guerra informativa per l’Ucraina’ – Ironia di un programma satirico tedesco
05/10/2014 - Sul Canale della TV Tedesca “ZDF” è andato in onda un programma satirico proposto dal gruppo teatrale “Napalm” che ha fatto una azzeccatissima rappresentazione di come venga gestita la guerra informativa sulla crisi in Ucraina…
http://www.pandoratv.it/?p=1951
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PTKcXm-UmE ***

Altri link:

Ucraina, la tregua è carta straccia. Arrivano i panzer tedeschi (Marco Santopadre, 15 Settembre 2014)

German committee criticises television news coverage of Ukraine (By Sybille Fuchs, WSWS 26 September 2014)

Germany’s new war minister and Stern magazine (By Denis Krassnin / WSWS, 29 September 2014)
On September 1, 2014, the German federal government resolved to deliver weapons to the war zone in Iraq. In doing so, it took another major step towards reviving German great-power politics. The media were absolutely delighted with the decision…

German media and politicians promote rearmament (By Christoph Dreier / WSWS, 29 September 2014)

Von Dolchstößen und westlichen Werten (Medien und Ukraine-Konflikt - GFP, 29.09.2014) 
Der Kampf um die politische Formierung der öffentlichen Meinung in der Ukraine-Krise durch die öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkanstalten spitzt sich zu. Nachdem vorletzte Woche bekannt wurde, dass der ARD-Programmbeirat dem Sender schon im Juni eine tendenziell antirussische Berichterstattung und eine völlig unzulängliche Recherche vorgeworfen hat, ist jetzt auch Kritik im ZDF-Fernsehrat laut geworden. Anlass war die Frage einer überregionalen Zeitung, ob das Gremium es hinnehme, dass in ZDF-Nachrichtensendungen Milizionäre mit NS-Affinität ohne kritischen Kommentar gezeigt und in einen Zusammenhang mit "Freiheitskämpfern" gestellt würden. Der ZDF-Cefredakteur hält es mit Verweis auf einen angeblichen "Unterton" des Einwands nicht für nötig, die Frage, die von einer demokratisch gewählten Bundestagsabgeordneten gestellt wurde, zu beantworten. Gleichzeitig wird der Intendant des WDR mit der intern geäußerten Mitteilung zitiert, man müsse in den TV-Sendungen "westliche Positionen verteidigen". Medien denunzieren Kritiker der einseitigen Berichterstattung als "fünfte Medienkolonne" Moskaus und warnen vor einem "Dolchstoß aus den eigenen Reihen"…

The revival of German militarism: One year on (Peter Schwarz / WSWS, 3 October 2014)
One year ago today German President Joachim Gauck announced that Germany once again is striving to be a world power…

German public television turns out propaganda on Ukraine (By Sibylle Fuchs / WSWS, 3 October 2014)

La Germania pronta ad inviare in Ucraina 200 paracadutisti (4/10/2014)
http://italian.ruvr.ru/news/2014_10_04/La-Germania-pronta-ad-inviare-in-Ucraina-200-paracadutisti-2600/

Unter Kuratel (Bundeswehr-Einsatz in der Ukraine geplant - GFP, 6/10/2014)
Die Bundesregierung bereitet einen Einsatz der Bundeswehr in der Ukraine vor. Berichten zufolge sollen bis zu 200 deutsche Militärs in den Osten des Landes entsandt werden, um dort die OSZE-Mission zur Kontrolle des Waffenstillstands zwischen den Truppen der Kiewer Regierung und den Aufständischen zu unterstützen. Die Entscheidung über den Einsatz wird in wenigen Tagen erwartet. Es wäre die dritte Intervention nach den Aufrüstungs- und Trainingsoperationen im Irak und dem Aufbau einer Luftbrücke nach Westafrika, die binnen kürzester Zeit beschlossen würde - ein Ausdruck des gesteigerten Willens der Bundesregierung, ihre außenpolitischen Aktivitäten mit einer militärischen Präsenz zu begleiten. Der geplante Einsatz der Bundeswehr in der Ukraine soll die direkte deutsche Kontrolle über die militärischen Aktivitäten in dem Land ausbauen. Es wäre der erste Kampfeinsatz deutscher Truppen auf dem Territorium der ehemaligen Sowjetunion seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg und brächte deutsche Soldaten zugleich in die Nähe der russischen Grenze. Zudem geht er einher mit Erwägungen, auch die staatliche Verwaltung faktisch unter deutsch-europäische Kuratel zu stellen…
http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/de/fulltext/58964

Under Tutelage (German government is preparing military deployment in Ukraine - GFP, 6/10/2014)
The German government is preparing the Bundeswehr's deployment in Ukraine. According to reports, in support of the OSCE mission to monitor the ceasefire between the Kiev government troops and the insurgents, up to 200 German soldiers will be deployed in the East of the country. The decision on the deployment is expected to be made in the next few days. Following armament and training operations in Iraq and the airlift to West Africa, this would be the third intervention to have been decided in a short period time. It shows that the German government is increasingly willing to supplement its foreign policy activities with military engagement. With the planned Bundeswehr deployment in Ukraine, Germany wants to reinforce its direct control over military activities inside that country. It would be the first combat mission of German troops since WW II on territory of the former Soviet Union, placing German soldiers close to the Russian border. This goes hand in hand with considerations to actually place the state administration under German-European tutelage…
http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/58789

Germany to deploy combat troops in Ukraine (By Christoph Dreier / WSWS, 7 October 2014)

German Green Party-affiliated think tank calls for renewed offensive against Russia (By Stefan Steinberg / WSWS, 8 October 2014)
See also: German Greens incite conflict with Russia
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/05/08/gree-m08.html

Germany: Joschka Fischer’s declaration of war on Russia (By Peter Schwarz / WSWS, 9 October 2014)

Germany’s Left Party emerges as a party of war (By Ulrich Rippert / WSWS, 17 October 2014)

German NATO general announces plans for military maneuvers against Russia (By Johannes Stern / WSWS, 10 November 2014)

German army prepares for civil war (By Denis Krassnin and Peter Schwarz / WSWS, 13 November 2014)

Aktives Krisenmanagement (Bundesakademie für Sicherheitspolitik unterstützt Firmenexpansion in Kriegs- und Krisengebiete -- GFP, 19.11.2014) 
Die Bundesakademie für Sicherheitspolitik (BAKS) kündigt zum wiederholten Male eine Konferenz zur Förderung der Expansion deutscher Unternehmen in Kriegs- und Bürgerkriegsgebiete an. Die Konferenz, die nächste Woche stattfinden soll, hat die Absicherung von in "Krisenregionen" tätigen Geschäftsleuten zum Thema. Um diese vor Angriffen zu schützen, sei der enge "Schulterschluss zwischen Staat und Wirtschaft" notwendig, erklärt die BAKS. Auf dem Programm der Tagung steht eine "umfassende Darstellung" der "Sicherheitslage" im Nahen Osten und in der Ukraine; zudem sollen "Maßnahmen" erarbeitet werden, die es deutschen Firmen ermöglichen, im Fall einer Entführung ihrer Mitarbeiter "schneller und effektiver" zu reagieren. Die Konferenz findet in Zusammenarbeit mit einem führenden Versicherungsmakler statt, der unter anderem sogenannte Kidnapping-Policen vermittelt. Beteiligt sind auch private Sicherheitsunternehmen, die damit werben, "weltweit" über "ortskundige Spezialisten" auf dem Gebiet des Personenschutzes zu verfügen. Bei diesen handelt es sich zumeist um vormalige Angehörige polizeilicher oder militärischer Spezialeinheiten…

German military to lead NATO rapid response force (By Philipp Frisch / WSWS, 20 November 2014)

--- sullo stesso tema da JUGOINFO:

Sahra Wagenknecht sulla guerra europea

Angela Merkel benedice la guerra santa contro il Donbass

Le contraddizioni dell'imperialismo tedesco / 2

Le contraddizioni dell'imperialismo tedesco / 1
https://it.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/crj-mailinglist/conversations/messages/8036

1914-2014, German "Left" Ready for War
https://it.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/crj-mailinglist/conversations/messages/8038

Lo "spazio vitale tedesco" (1995)
https://it.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/crj-mailinglist/conversations/messages/8022

L’Allemagne est-elle impliquée en Ukraine ?


=== 1 ===

ANCHE IN GERMANIA LA SINISTRA È DESTRA
 
La deputata del partito die Linke ANNETTE GROTH è minacciata di espulsione dal partito:
 
CHI È ANNETTE GROTH?
 
È una parlamentare eletta per la lista “die Linke” in un collegio elettorale del Baden-Württemberg che si è distinta nel lavoro internazionalista di assistenza ai profughi dal terzo mondo e nella solidarietà alla lotta dei popoli oppressi.
Ha perorato la causa degli emigranti “clandestini” attraverso tutta la Germania con conferenze e dibattiti ed ha condannato la politica di crudele chiusura dei confini che ha causato innumerevoli eccidi in mare.
Ha portato la propria solidarietà agli ospiti di Lampedusa e dei “centri di accoglienza” al confine greco-turco.
Le sue denunce all’opinione pubblica e alle autorità europee hanno contribuito a far conoscere, e a migliorare di un po’, le disastrose condizioni di detenzione dei clandestini ammassati nelle carceri greche.
 
È un’attiva sostenitrice della causa palestinese.
Era a bordo del Mavi Marmara, la nave turca che ha cercato di rompere il blocco di Gaza, ed è stata imprigionata per un breve periodo di tempo nelle carceri israeliane con l’accusa di … appoggiare la causa palestinese.
Ha curato la traduzione ed ha promosso la pubblicazione (anche in lingua italiana) del rapporto dell’ONU sulla situazione dei diritti umani in Palestina.
Perché mai la si vuole oggi espellere dal partito? Di quale grave colpa si è macchiata?
 
Quella di aver organizzato una serie conferenze a Berlino cui avrebbero dovuto partecipare due ebrei antisionisti, uno israeliano e l’altro nordamericano: Max Blumenthal e David Sheen.
 
Alcuni manutengoli del sionismo, strenui difensori dei suoi periodici massacri, hanno denunciato con prontezza il tentativo degli “ebrei antisemiti” di macchiare con la loro presenza il ricordo dell’olocausto (sic). Con invidiabile tempestività`è intervenuto Gysi, il loquace ed eloquente segretario del partito “die Linke”, vietando la concessione della sala in cui la conferenza avrebbe dovuto svolgersi.
I due mancati relatori hanno invano cercato di farsi ricevere da Gysi per chiarire le loro posizioni, ma quando egli è uscito dall’ufficio per recarsi al bagno, l’ebreo israeliano lo ha inseguito gridandogli addosso che –a seguito delle sue dichiarazioni diffamatorie- egli stava mettendo in serio pericolo  la sua vita e quella dei suoi figli (più volte le belve sioniste hanno dimostrato di non esitare ad assassinare anche ebrei antisionisti.
 
Ma chi è davvero Gregor Gysi?
Gregor Gysi è una specie di super-Bertinotti, che spesso si reca a conferire con l’ambasciatore USA e più spesso ancora viene convocato da quello israeliano…
Penso che questo triste episodio segnali che i vertici del partito die Linke si stiano preparando ad una radicale inversione di rotta che prevede l’alleanza con i socialdemocratici e l’ingresso inglorioso fra i sostenitori dell’organizzazione “difensiva” della NATO.
Come si può pensare infatti di voler continuare a condannare la NATO (cosa cheancora talvolta succede nel partito) quando si sostengono apertamente i nazisti che sono al governo in Israele?
 
Giuseppe Zambon


=== 2 ===


Merkel’s “Hun Speech” against Russia


By Johannes Stern 
19 November 2014


On July 27, 1900, Kaiser Wilhelm II delivered his infamous “Hun speech” (Hunnenrede) in Bremerhaven. Addressing the German East Asian Expeditionary Corps, which was traveling to China to bloodily suppress the Boxer Rebellion, he said that the German army had been “built up during thirty years of faithful, peaceful labour.”

He accused China of “upsetting international law” and having “mocked the sacredness of the envoy, the duties of hospitality in a way unheard of in world history.”

Finally, he made the infamous threat: “Just as a thousand years ago the Huns under their King Attila made a name for themselves, one that even today makes them seem mighty in history and legend, so may the name German be affirmed by you in such a way in China that no Chinese will ever again dare to look cross-eyed at a German.”

Angela Merkel’s frontal attack on Russia following the G20 summit in Australia brings to mind this type of German great power politics. Like Wilhelm II, Merkel is trying to present her own aggressive conduct as a means of defending peace and international law and brand her antagonist, in this case Russia, as the aggressor.

At a meeting in Sydney at the Lowy Institute for International Policy, a think tank run by the multibillionaire Frank Lowy, the fourth-richest Australian, Merkel accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of “trampling on international law,” refusing to “resolve the conflict by democratic and constitutional means,” relying on the “supposed right of the strongest,” and “following the horrors of two world wars and the Cold War…placing in question the entire European order of peace.”

That is “exactly what took place with the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia at the beginning of this year,” the chancellor declared. Now this finds “its continuation in Russian efforts to destabilize eastern Ukraine in Donetsk and Luhansk.” Russia had violated “the territorial integrity and state sovereignty of Ukraine,” and thinks in terms of “spheres of influence,” she added.

In her remarks, the chancellor spoke against a “military solution to the crisis.” However, her accusations against Russia not only lacked any foundation, the logic of her reproach implied that Moscow’s alleged breach of international law and peace led to a military confrontation. Her bellicose remarks were designed to further poison the political climate in order to create the conditions for encircling Russia militarily and pushing it into a corner.

The G20 summit was dominated by an intensification of the conflict with Russia. The heads of government of the imperialist powers closed ranks against Putin and provoked his early departure. In her speech, Merkel demonstratively stood behind the anti-Russian government in Ukraine and promised she would support it “politically and economically.”

With this backing, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko on the same day threatened Russia with “total war.” Speaking on the fringes of a commemoration in Bratislava, he said, “I have no fear of war with Russian troops and we have prepared for such a scenario of total war. Our army is currently in a much better state than five months ago and we have support from all over the world.”

The German government is playing a central role in the aggressive moves against Moscow. In February, in close collaboration with the US government and fascist forces, it organised a putsch against then-Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych after he had refused to sign an Association Agreement with the European Union. Since then, it has worked closely with the Poroshenko regime and is playing a leading a role in the military encirclement of Russia.

Last weekend, Die Welt reported that the Bundeswehr (Armed Forces) will lead a rapid reaction force that NATO is establishing in response to the Ukraine conflict for the purpose of sending a “clear signal to Moscow.” In September, Germany took the lead in aerial patrols over the Baltic States and has doubled its contingent in the Multinational Northeast Corps in Szczecin, Poland. Last week, German NATO General Hans-Lothar Domröse raised the threat of major NATO maneuvers on the Russian border.

For years, NATO has been extending its borders eastwards and is now making increasingly open preparations for war against Russia. But in Sydney, Merkel accused Russia of systematically extending its area of influence. “It’s not just about Ukraine, it’s about Moldavia, it’s about Georgia, she declared. “If this continues, one can ask: Does one need to add Serbia, must one add the western Balkan states? In any case, that is not compatible with our values.”

“We also know from history that one cannot afford to be too peaceable, that one has to take seriously what is said and listen carefully,” Merkel continued.

When a German head of government says history teaches that Germany must not be “too peaceable” towards Russia, one’s blood runs cold. Seventy-five years ago, Germany carried out a war of annihilation against the Soviet Union, committing the most heinous crimes in the history of mankind, including the Holocaust, the murder of 27 million Soviet citizens, and the devastation of large parts of Eastern Europe.

Merkel said the conflict over Ukraine “cannot be solved militarily,” but then added threateningly, “On the other hand, one can’t say: Because we cannot solve the crisis militarily, we can’t solve it at all.”

The German ruling elite is very aware of its historic crimes. In Sydney, Merkel recalled “the beginning of World War II 75 years ago and the collapse of civilization embodied in the Shoah, and even more importantly, the beginning of the First World War 100 years ago.”

But all her talk of “diplomatic” and “not military” solutions, supposedly based on the experiences of the wars of the last century, is crude propaganda. It is aimed at cloaking the return of Germany to militarism and great power politics, and, as under Kaiser Wilhelm, portraying an aggressive war policy as the “politics of peace.”

With reference to the “primal catastrophe of the 20th century,” Merkel asked, “Ladies and gentlemen, how could things go so far between peoples and nations one hundred years ago?”

Merkel should know. Today, just as then, the ruthless and aggressive imperialist policies of the great powers threaten to cast humanity into the abyss. The Western-orchestrated putsch in Ukraine, the military encirclement of Russia and China, and the renewed war in the Middle East have turned the world into a powder keg that could explode at any time. As in the first half of the last century, Germany is now playing an especially aggressive role.