Behind Washington’s hypocritical talk of
“national sovereignty,” “territorial integrity”
and “international law” in its efforts to
undercut the overwhelming vote of the people of
Crimea to join Russia stands a stark struggle
over whether Ukraine will be dragged into the
ever expanding, U.S.-commanded NATO military
web.
Since 1995, the year NATO waged its first
aggressive war against Yugoslavia, NATO has
expanded into nine countries of Eastern Europe
and three former republics of the former
Soviet Union.
The Obama administration is using more than
words in this deepening struggle.
The Pentagon has moved F-16 fighter-bombers,
F-15 fighters, C-130 transport planes and
RC-135 aerial tankers to Russia’s borders and
sent the USS Truxtun destroyer, armed with
cruise missiles, which can carry nuclear
warheads, into the Black Sea. Washington
threatens economic sanctions, putting pressure
on Germany and other EU members to join in. A
lot is at stake.
NATO membership was a key provision in the
agreement that Ukraine’s President Viktor
Yanukovych balked at signing with the EU last
November. The Maidan Square occupation in
Kiev, the capital, aimed at stampeding the
government into joining the EU and NATO.
Fascist ultraright paramilitary organizations,
such as Right Sector and the neo-Nazi Svoboda
party took the lead.
During the Kiev occupation and since, these
openly armed terror organizations burned
political offices of communists, pulled down
revolutionary statues, attacked gay people and
defaced homes of Ukrainian Jews. Despite their
open fascist symbols and criminal acts,
Arizona Sen. John McCain, Secretary of State
John Kerry and Assistant Secretary of State
Victoria Nuland openly met with and embraced
these reactionaries.
On Feb. 21-22, the fascist forces overthrew
the elected government, seized Parliament and
expelled government officials, even though
Yanukovych had just reached an agreement with
the EU, including many concessions and the
scheduling of new elections. The first act of
the coup government, after deposing Yanukovych
in a rump parliament, without a quorum, was to
ban Russian and Greek language usage by
Ukrainian minorities and to end Crimea’s
autonomy within Ukraine.
Within days, the coup regime named fascists
to key posts in the new state — the Svoboda
Party’s Andriy Parubiy as secretary of the
National Security and Defense Council, Right
Sector head Dmytro Yarosh as his deputy and
Svoboda’s Ihor Tenhyok as minister of defense.
The U.S.-favored right-wing banker Arseniy
Yatsenyuk became prime minister.
The immediate attack on Crimea’s autonomy
confirms how well the coup government fell in
line with NATO’s plan for expansion. The
Crimea is the only non-Arctic base to provide
a port for the Russian Navy.
Washington and Berlin immediately granted
recognition to this coup government. In an
effort to lend further legitimacy, the
unelected Yatsenyuk was invited to a meeting
at the White House and to the United Nations
Security Council.
It should be no surprise then that the gut
response of most of the population of the
Crimea to this fascist threat was to hold a
referendum on whether to continue autonomy or
rejoin Russia. Nor that Russian Prime Minister
Putin decided to order Russian troops, whose
presence in Crimea is approved of by treaty
with Ukraine, to secure their position in the
peninsula. The collective memory of the
Russian-speaking majority in Crimea is shaped
by stories of the Nazi invasion and massive
destruction in World War II.
Remember Croatia and Kosovo
This is not the first time that U.S.
imperialism has used terror tactics and
economic destabilization, and publicly
embraced paramilitary monsters.
The videos of Blackwater mercenaries and
right-wing militias operating in eastern
Ukraine and movements of Ukrainian military
and National Guard raised great apprehension.
If the fascist coup government could in one
measure end Crimea’s long held autonomy, the
likely next step would be to order the Russian
Navy out of its own base. Perhaps it would
expel a large part of Crimea’s population. If
that seems unbelievable, consider what
happened in other U.S. supported rightist
coups in Croatia and in Kosovo, a province of
Serbia, and their similarities with the
Ukraine situation.
During World War II, the fascist Ustashe had
welcomed the Italian fascist and German Nazi
occupation and carried out genocide against
the Jewish and Serbian populations of Croatia.
A united multinational partisan resistance
movement throughout Yugoslavia finally
defeated the fascists, drove out the German
army and laid the basis for the Yugoslav
Socialist Federation as the war ended.
The return of this same criminal Ustashe
organization, its 1991 declaration of
independence for Croatia and separation from
the Yugoslav Federation were immediately
recognized by Berlin and soon by Washington.
This political support for a right-wing
separatist movement by the U.S. and Germany,
combined with the 1995 attack on Bosnia and
the 1999 NATO air war, led to the breakup of
the Yugoslav Socialist Federation.
After declaring Croatian independence in 1991
and taking command of the police and military,
the Ustashe carried out attacks on the
Serbian population. It outlawed the rights of
the Serbian minority, who had lived in Croatia
since the Middle Ages, expelling them from
their farms, evicting them from apartments,
firing them from state jobs and cancelling
their pensions and social services.
Fearing the mass executions like those these
fascists had carried out during World War II,
the Serbs in Croatia resisted and civil war
broke out. By 1995, more than 200,000 Serbs
had been driven from the Krajina region in
Croatia.
Similar rightist forces unleashed the civil
war in Bosnia, another republic of the
Yugoslav Federation. This led to even deeper
ethnic divisions, great destruction and loss
of life.
Before the Ustashe seized power in Croatia,
the annual U.S. Foreign Appropriation Law
101-513 in 1990 created a political and
economic crisis in the Yugoslav economy. It
cut off all aid, trade, credits and loans
until each of the six Yugoslav republics held
separate elections for independence. At the
same time, secretly funded mercenaries and
militias flooded into the region, spreading
terror.
In both Russia and Ukraine, many are aware of
the U.S. role in shaping the civil war in
Bosnia to justify NATO intervention. First, in
1995, U.S./NATO used 400 aircraft and 5,000
personnel from 15 nations in the 21-day
bombing of Serbian-held positions in Bosnia.
Then, Washington imposed the Dayton Accords,
which stationed 60,000 NATO troops in Bosnia.
This bombing and occupation of Bosnia was the
first crucial step in the expansion of the
NATO military alliance into the Balkans, and
then into East Europe and the former Soviet
republics.
What is NATO?
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is a
military-machine alliance under U.S.
domination and run to project Wall Street’s
interests. NATO has a U.S.-commanded military
structure imposed by U.S. corporate policy
since it was founded in 1949, at the peak of
U.S. power.
Since the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union,
NATO has aggressively expanded until it is now
the biggest political-military alliance in
history, with 28 member countries. Its
“partnership programs” bring the total number
of countries trapped in this U.S.-spun
military web to 70 countries. U.S. taxpayers
pay 70 percent of NATO expenses, a huge
subsidy to U.S. military corporations.
The combined defense expenditures of all 28
NATO countries in 2013 amounted to $1.02
trillion or over $1 million millions. In
comparison, Russia spends $90 billion. Iran
spends under $7 billion. (Stars and Stripes,
Feb. 25 — tinyurl.com/o332a4e)
In addition, NATO troops are part of the
13-year continuing U.S. occupation of
Afghanistan. From 2004 to 2011, tens of
thousands of troops under NATO command
participated in the eight-year occupation that
destroyed Iraq.
Starting March 24, 1999, NATO carried out a
78-day bombardment of Serbia that included
38,000 combat missions, using 1,000 aircraft
along with cruise missiles fired from aircraft
carriers, destroyers and submarines. The
targets were overwhelmingly civilian,
including bridges, railroads, factories,
refineries, power stations, telecommunications
facilities, embassies, 480 schools and 33
hospitals.
NATO cut Kosovo province out of Serbia,
creating a NATO protectorate with 50,000
troops and building Camp Bondsteel, a massive
U.S. military base. Despite the U.S. pledge
that Kosovo was historically part of Serbia
and would remain so, Washington quickly
recognized Kosovo’s independence in 2008.
In 2011, NATO bombed Libya for 220 days, with
26,500 sorties, overwhelmingly flown by the
U.S. Air Force, but with 19 countries pulled
into the imperialist aggression.
Communications centers, apartment buildings,
water networks and the electric grid were
targeted. The reactionary militias that
U.S./NATO funded and backed up militarily
brutally tortured and murdered Moammar
Gadhafi, the leader of this African country.
The imperialists fraudulently called each of
these blatant aggressions “humanitarian acts”
to prevent “genocide” or to protect peace. In
fact, each NATO operation was a brutal act of
colonial conquest and expansion.
Transforming NATO
NATO’s main task at its 1949 founding was to
confront and challenge the Soviet Union. But
it was also established to secure U.S.
military and economic domination in Western
Europe, a check against working-class
uprisings and the rise of any imperialist
competitors. It wasn’t until 1955 that the
USSR and East European countries established
the Warsaw Pact to counter NATO’s Cold War
pressure.
In 1990, as the Soviet Union was retreating
under the pressure of 45 years of Cold War,
U.S. Secretary of State Baker and German
Chancellor Helmut Kohl made a commitment that
was quickly broken. They said NATO troops
would not expand “one inch” further east, not
even into the former German Democratic
Republic.
The USSR’s conciliatory Mikhail Gorbachev
leadership swallowed this commitment and
agreed to withdraw the 380,000 Soviet troops
from East Germany, where by treaty they had a
right to be stationed since the end of World
War II in 1945. This in effect ended the
Warsaw Pact military alliance. (Counterpunch,
March 13; The Atlantic, March 3)
Despite these talks and agreements, the
expansion of NATO right up to the borders of
Russia has been the focus of U.S. policy
through both Republican and Democratic
administrations.
Although U.S. policy had long been to support
and fund dissident individuals and
organizations of opposition throughout the
Warsaw Pact countries, after 1990 the
floodgates opened. Western corporations and
banks sought resources. Exiled wealthy
families surged back into the region to
attempt to reclaim ownership of industries,
vast estates and swaths of land they had
previously owned that had been collectivized.
Fascist groups from the Ustashe in Croatia to
Svobodo and the National Socialist Party in
Ukraine, the war criminals whom the CIA had
smuggled west at the end of WW II and helped
to secretly maintain in exile for decades,
surged back in. They returned awash in funds
for offices, staff, publications, political
parties, nongovernmental organizations and
civil society organizations. They
drafted and printed anti-communist schoolbooks
full of extreme sectarian nationalism and
ethnic hatred. They also established militias
and hired armed thugs to defend their newly
seized assets.
For the past 20 years, a handful of pirates
and privateers in each of the formerly
socialist countries were absorbed in laying
hold of every resource, industry or source of
formerly collective wealth and making deals
and partnerships with U.S. and EU corporations
and moving vast sums of money to the West.
These new oligarchs assumed that they would
be offered an equal seat at the capitalist
table. They foolishly did not realize that
they were the main course. This is the age of
capitalist overproduction, decline and
commodity super abundance. There is no more
room at the table.
By clear majorities, country polls of almost
every new NATO member showed that the people
opposed joining NATO. But imperialist
conquest takes place through stealth and
deception and through bloody wars and massive
destruction, not democratic choice. The
lessons of past NATO crimes and the rich
history of resistance to fascism throughout
the region serve as a model for the
anti-fascist, progressive and working-class
forces throughout Europe today. The only way
to defeat fascism and imperialist domination
is through multinational working-class unity,
organization and a will to struggle.
The author was in Yugoslavia during the
1999 U.S./NATO bombing and witnessed the
massive civilian destruction. She is a
co-author and editor of “NATO in the
Balkans,” (1998) and “Hidden Agenda —
U.S./ NATO Takeover of Yugoslavia,” (2002),
both published by the International Action
Center.
|