GLI USA VOGLIONO BOMBARDARE ISRAELE

Appello (fai girare!)

Le portaerei e le basi USA in Qatar sono in allerta e Tel Aviv è in
pericolo.

Il Presidente Bush ha dichiarato che: "...da troppi anni Israele è un
pericolo per la pace e si è messo fuori dalla comunità internazionale.
E' necessario bombardare subito Tel Aviv perché:

- Israele si è sempre opposto alle ispezioni dell'ONU.

- Non ha mai firmato il Trattato di non-proliferazione nucleare.

- Possiede 300 testate nucleari conservate nella base sotterranea di
Dimona nel deserto del Negev (il tecnico nucleare Mordechai Vanunu che
lo ha denunciato è stato rapito a Roma da un commando israeliano e
imprigionato in isolamento da 15 anni per rivelazione di segreti
militari).

- Nel 67 ha invaso l'Egitto e la Giordania , il Libano nell'82, la
Palestina nel 2001

- Nel 68 ha rubato 200 tonnellate di Uranio dalla nave Jumblatt nel
Mediterraneo.

- Nel 73 ha dirottato aerei della Meaddle East Airlaines per catturare
i dirigenti di AlFatah

- Nel 76 ha abbattuto l'aereo militare italiano Argo 16 (l'articolo 5
del Trattato Nato impone che tutta la Nato è automaticamente in guerra
contro uno Stato che aggredisce un suo membro)

- Nell'82 ha bombardato la centrale nucleare di Bagdad

- Nell'83 ha bombardato il quartier generale palestinese di Tunisi

- Il capo di Israele, Ariel Sharon, è un criminale di guerra che ha
ordinato le stragi di Sabra e Chatila sottraendosi poi al processo di
Bruxelles per i crimini contro l'umanità

- Nonostante sia l'unico stato fondato su dichiarazione dell'ONU (del
'47) non ha mai rispettato le delibere dell'ONU (le delibere 242 e 338
gli impongono da 35 anni di abbandonare la Cisgiordania occupata)

- Israele applica al suo interno, contro il 19% della sua popolazione
di origine araba, leggi razziali praticamente uguali a quelle emesse
da Mussolini nel '38 contro gli ebrei

- Violando qualsiasi regola internazionale Israele uccide i dirigenti
dell'ANP, imprigiona le loro famiglie e distrugge le case dei
Palestinesi; invade militarmente i quartieri palestinesi, ruba le case
arabe falsificando il catasto, arma i coloni che aggrediscono gli
arabi..."

Il Presidente Bush ha intimato un ultimatum all'ONU: "...dovete
approvare il nostro bombardamento di Tel Aviv. Gli Stati Uniti, in
nome della pace internazionale e dei Diritti Umani, hanno deciso di
dare una lezione militare a Israele per imporgli di adeguarsi alle
regole di convivenza fra Stati..."

Di fronte a queste dichiarazioni l'Unione Europea e Kofi Hannan si
oppongono al bombardamento di Tel Aviv perché ritengono che: "...si
possano ancora trovare spiragli di trattative negoziali, mentre la
guerra scatenerebbe solo reazioni antioccidentali in tutto il mondo
ebraico, anche in quella componente democratica che si oppone ai
crimini di Israele"

Finora gli USA hanno solo l'appoggio della Gran Bretagna e dell'Irak.

Berlusconi ha dichiarato che "siamo a fianco degli USA e difendiamo
l'ONU in nome dell'Unione Europea" (nessuno ha capito cosa
significasse, tranne l'Onorevole Cirami che ha proposto una legge per
finanziare i debiti di Mediaset).

Manifestiamo la nostra opposizione al bombardamento di uno stato
pacifico e democratico che, nonostante qualche piccola marachella, non
produce nemmeno una goccia di petrolio.

Diffondiamo questa E-mail e ricordiamoci che abbiamo una testa fatta
anche per pensare

(ricevuto via email)

http://it.groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-
mailinglist/files/aikor_milo25_9_02.txt


DEN HAAG: DER WEG-SCHAUPROZESS GEHT WEITER
Von Klaus Hartmann
(Vizepräsident des Internationalen Komitees für die Verteidigung von
Slobodan Milosevic)
[ 1 ]

ZU PROTOKOLL
MILOSEVIC NIMMT MARKOVIC INS KREUZVERHÖR
Aus: KONKRET 9/02
[ 2 ]

PUTSCH IN BELGRAD
Moritz Hunzinger, Einflußagent der Rüstungsindustrie, hat sich nicht
nur einen deutschen Verteidigungsminister gehalten, sondern auch den
serbischen Ministerpräsidenten aufgebaut
Von Jürgen Elsässer.
Aus: KONKRET 9/02
[ 3 ]

DISZIPLINARBESCHWERDE GEGEN EINEN "FREUND DES GERICHTS"
- Erklärung des Rechtsanwalts Nico Steijnen im Namen von Slododan
Milosevic und Kommentar zum Hintergrund der Beschwerde -
(18. 09. 02)
[ 4 ]

SPENDENAUFRUF
FREEDOM ASSOCIATION
YUGOSLAV COMMITEE FOR THE DEFENSE OF SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC
(07.09.2002)
[ 5 ]


Alle Artikeln unter:

http://it.groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/files/aikor_milo25_9_02.tx=
t

zu lesen.

International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic *
www.icdsm.org

The URL for this article is:
http://www.icdsm.org/more/freezer1.htm

Subscribe to the ICDSM email list at
http://www.icdsm.org/maillist.htm Receive articles
posted at www.icdsm.org
=======================================
The Freezer Truck Hoax
How NATO framed Slobodan Milosevic
* In Four Parts *
Part I: NATO's Problem
by Francisco J. Gil-White
[Posted 19 September 2002]
=======================================

During the war on Yugoslavia, NATO justified its shower
of bombs by claiming that Slobodan Milosevic was in the
process of killing as many as 100,000 Albanian
civilians. [1]

In late May 1999, during the bombing, the Hague
Tribunal issued an indictment against Slobodan
Milosevic for ?war crimes.?[2] Then after the bombing,
from June until November 1999, NATO and UN
investigators scoured Kosovo NATO looking for evidence
of mass murder so they could send Milosevic to The
Hague.

There was only one problem: NATO produced no evidence.

[START REUTERS QUOTE]

"UN investigators have exhumed 2,108 corpses in Kosovo
so far, but the true number of ethnic Albanian victims
may be much higher, the chief UN [War Crimes Tribunal]
prosecutor Carla del Ponte said on Wednesday."[3]

[END REUTERS QUOTE]

NATO had claimed up to 100,000 Albanian civilians were
killed by Milosevic's forces. But 2108 is only 2% of
100,000. Could NATO really be off by 98%?

No, it was worse.

*Before* the onset of bombing, NATO estimated that
fighting between the Yugoslav Army and the Kosovo
Liberation Army terrorists, or KLA, had resulted in
2000 deaths on all sides. [4] So, if they found 2108
corpses in their post-bombing investigation, then by
NATO's own numbers no more than 108 people had died
during NATO's attack.

So, NATO had produced only 108 out of the claimed
100,000? That is, they were off by 99.9%?

No, it was worse.

First, Del Ponte?s 2108 figure was of ?exhumed
corpses.? Thus it included not only Albanian civilians,
but Serbian civilians, KLA combat deaths, Serbian
combat deaths, NATO-bomb victims, KLA victims-everyone.

Moreover, we know that NATO dropped bombs primarily on
civilian targets, including convoys of tractors and
cars full of?*Albanian civilians* (see APPENDIX).
http://www.icdsm.org/more/freezer1app.htm

Finally, the KLA several times proudly claimed
responsibility for terrorist attacks against
uncooperative Albanian civilians. [5]

So we can't assume the "extra" 108 were all Albanian
civilians and we can't assume they were killed by
Serbian forces. We can't assume anything.

So what do we have? That, *using NATO?s own numbers*:

1. NATO?s estimate of murdered Albanian civilians was
off by 100%.

2. NATO?s bombs and KLA terrorism can easily account
for any Albanian civilians who might be among del
Ponte?s exhumed corpses.

Hence NATO's problem. Because the Hague Tribunal meant
to put *Slobodan Milosevic* on trial for war crimes-not
NATO, and not the KLA.

You may well ask: why is this a ?problem?? Why not just
drop the charges against Milosevic and try NATO and its
ally, the KLA, for war crimes?

Because that's not the function of the Hague Tribunal.
It was set up illegally and is funded by NATO for the
specific purpose of putting Serbs on trial, not NATO
officials. (See here, and here).

And thus on 13 June 2000, the Hague Tribunal announced
?that no investigation [will] be commenced by the OTP
[Office of The Prosecutor] in relation to the NATO
bombing campaign.?[6]

And that is why, in her November 1999 press conference,
Carla del Ponte, The Hague's chief prosecutor,
expressed the hope (!) that ?the true number of ethnic
Albanian victims may be much higher.?

But del Ponte?s hoped-for corpses did not materialize,
and by August 2000, as the UN and NATO forensic experts
wrapped up their investigations, the *total* body count
was still??under 3,000.?[7] Without the promised
cartloads of murdered Albanians, how were they going to
get Milosevic to The Hague?

NATO took a year trying to solve that one. And then
they came up with a solution. They suddenly 'realized'
that Milosevic?s forces had used freezer trucks to haul
thousands of murdered Albanians out of Kosovo, hiding
the bodies in Serbia.

Presto! Problem solved.

Never mind that before April 2001, in over two years of
investigations, this ?theory? *was never even heard
of*-not even hinted at; never mind that this 'theory'
was *patently absurd*; never mind that this 'theory'
was every so convenient for NATO.

Never mind that not *one shred* of evidence ever
existed to support this 'theory'?

On the ?strength? of this 'theory', Milosevic was
illegally abducted and sent to The Hague.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Up next I will do the following (if there is no link, I
am still working on that part):

PART 2. - I Examine the freezer-truck story on its own
terms and show that it defied all reason.

PART 3. - I show that the story was, in every respect,
*utterly false*.

To be precise, I will show that the whole thing was a
hoax perpetrated by the new, NATO-installed government
in Belgrade, in order to send Milosevic to The Hague
and please their masters. I will give proof.

PART 4. - I Examine how the mainstream Western press
*consciously lied* to the public concerning these
allegations.

I will show how the media enthusiastically and
lyrically grew and developed the freezer-truck story,
communicating with every turn of phrase that all its
important details were established fact, *always
disregarding available contrary evidence* including
evidence the press itself had already published.

To trace the details of the freezer-truck story is to
get an education in the structure and operation of a
vast propaganda system, colloquially known as the
Western free press.

FOOTNOTES


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] The Times (London), November 2, 1999, Tuesday,
Features, 553 words, Kosovo?s corpse count.

[2] In late May 1999, the Hague Tribunal decided to
indict Slobodan Milosevic for war crimes. See: The New
York Times, May 27, 1999, Thursday, Late Edition -
Final, Section A; Page 1; Column 6; Foreign Desk,
1323 words, "Crisis In The Balkans: The Indictment;
Tribunal Is Said To Cite Milosevic For War Crimes," By
Roger Cohen, Brussels, May 26

[3] Reuters, 11-10-99

[4] ?In Kosovo, an estimated 2000 people died from
February last year until March this year under
President Slobodan Milosevic's crackdown on ethnic
Albanian rebels.? The Daily Telegraph, June 5, 1999,
Saturday, WORLD; Pg. 20, 1026 words, Last hours of
an evil dream - But NATO leaders still wary of
Milosevic, Tom Hundley

[5] Here is an example: ?The clandestine Albanian
separatist movement Kosovo Liberation Army (UCK) has
vowed 'multiple vengeance for the innocent deaths' in
the Serbian region's central Drenica area, in a
statement published Wednesday?The UCK, a group that
wants the province to secede, has claimed
responsibility for numerous deadly attacks against
Serbian civilians and Albanians loyal to the Belgrade
regime.? Agence France Presse, March 04, 1998,
International news, 243 words, "Albanian separatists
vow 'multiple vengeance'"

[6] ?On the basis of the information available, the
committee recommends that no investigation be commenced
by the OTP in relation to the NATO bombing campaign or
incidents occurring during the campaign.?

This is the last, concluding line in: ICTY, Final
Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee established
to Review the NATO bombing Campaign Against the FRY,
PR/P.I.S./510-E, 13 June 2000

This document may be found in Krieger, H. (2001). The
Kosovo conflict and international law: An analytical
documentation 1974-1999, Cambridge International
Documents Series, Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. (pp.340-352).

[7] The Guardian, August 18, 2000, 989 words, "Serb
killings ?exaggerated? by west: Claims of up to 100,000
ethnic Albanians massacred in Kosovo revised to under
3,000 as exhumations near end," Jonathan Steele

* Francisco J. Gil-White is Assistant Professor of
Psychology at University of Pennsylvania and a fellow
in the Solomon Asch Center for Study of Ethnopolitical
Conflict. He specializes in ethnicity and the
psychology of ethnic conflict. He is Deputy Editor of
Emperor's Clothes.

---

***** Urgent Message from Sloboda (Freedom) Association
and the International Committee to Defend Slobodan
Milosevic!

The Freedom Association in Belgrade and the ICDSM,
based outside Yugoslavia, are the two organizations
formed at the request of Slobodan Milosevic to aid in
his defense.

Up until now our main work has been threefold. We have
publicized the truth about The Hague's phony trial. We
have organized research to help President Milosevic
expose NATO's lies. And we have initiated legal action
in the Dutch and European Courts.

Now our job has increased. The defense phase of the
"trial" starts in May 2003. No longer will Mr.
Milosevic be limited to cross-examining Hague
witnesses. The prosecution will be forced further onto
the defensive as victims of NATO's aggression and
experts from Yugoslavia and the NATO countries tell
what really happened and expose media lies. Moreover,
Mr. Milosevic will call leaders, from East and West,
some friendly and some hostile to the truth.

The controlled mass media will undoubtedly try to
suppress this testimony as they have tried to suppress
Mr. Milosevic's cross-examinations. Nevertheless this
phase of the "trial" will be the biggest international
forum ever to expose NATO's use of racism, violence and
lies to attack Yugoslavia.

We urgently need the help of all people who care about
what is happening in The Hague. Right now, Nico
Steijnen , the Dutch lawyer in the ICDSM, is waging
legal battles in the Dutch courts and before the
European Court, about which more news soon. These
efforts urgently require financial support. We now
maintain a small staff of Yugoslav lawyers in Holland,
assisting and advising Mr. Milosevic full-time. We need
to expand our Dutch facilities, perhaps bringing in a
non-Yugoslav attorney full-time. Definitely we must
guarantee that we have an office and office manager
available at all times, to compile and process evidence
and for meetings with witnesses and lawyers and as a
base for organizing press conferences.

All this costs money. And for this, we rely on those
who want Mr. Milosevic to have the best possible
support for attacking NATO's lies.

************
Here's how you can help...
************

* You may contribute by credit card. By the end of
September we will have an ICDSM secure server so you
can contribute directly on the Internet.

For now, you can contribute by credit card in two ways:
*

* Contribute by Credit Card over the Telephone

ICDSM office, USA: 1 617 916-1705
SLOBODA (Freedom) Association office, Belgrade: 381 63
279 819

* Contribute using PayPal at:
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=icdsm%40aol.com
PayPal accepts VISA and MasterCard

* Contribute by mail to:
ICDSM
831 Beacon St., #295
Newton Centre, MA 02459 (USA)

* Contribute by wire transfer to Sloboda Association

Intermediary:
UBS AG
Zurich, Switzerland
Swift Code: UBSWCHZH

Account with:
/ 756 - CHF
/ 840 - USD
/ 978 - EUR
Kmercijalna Banka AD
SV. Save 14, 11000 Belgrade, FR Yugoslavia
Swift Code: KOBBYUBG

Beneficiary: Account No. 5428-1246-16154-6
SLOBODA
Rajiceva 16, 11000 Belgrade, FR Yugoslavia

Thank you!

http://www.icdsm.org

URL for this article is
http://emperors-clothes.com/milo/freezer1app.htm

Join our email list at
http://emperors-clothes.com/f.htm
Receive articles from Emperor's Clothes Website

www.tenc.net * [Emperor's Clothes]

=======================================
CIVILIAN CASUALTIES AND THE FREEZER TRUCK HOAX
by Francisco J. Gil-White and Jared Israel
[Posted 23 September 2002]
This is also the Appendix to "The Freezer Truck Hoax:
How NATO framed Slobodan Milosevic, Part 1"
which can be read at
http://emperors-clothes.com/milo/freezer1.htm
=======================================

According to the Freezer Truck Story, Yugoslav forces
transported dozens of freezer trucks full of murdered
Albanian civilians over hundreds of kilometers of
roads, many of them partly bombed-out, and often over
mountains, out of Kosovo and deep into upper Serbia.

This was done, we are told, in the midst of
around-the-clock NATO bombing.

The idea of trying to hide bodies by transporting them
hundreds of miles in freezer trucks (Mercedes Benz, no
less!) is grotesquely absurd. But in addition we must
factor in the risk, given what NATO was doing at that
time to Serbia, including Kosovo.

This is described in text and pictures in the "White
Book on NATO Aggression Against Yugoslavia." The White
Book is based on evidence compiled by forensic
technicians and magistrates and was published by the
Yugoslav government. You may access it at
http://www.balkan-archive.org.yu/kosovo_crisis/destruction/white_book2/

The White Book makes clear that NATO could bomb
anything that moved in Kosovo. Anything.

Had Serbian forces attempted to drive dozens of
slow-moving freezer trucks cross-country, some surely
would have been bombed while others would have been
ambushed by Kosovo Liberation Army terrorists. The KLA
terrorists had excellent rapport with the Western
media. Within hours the news would have been broadcast
worldwide. Anybody attempting such a hair-brained
cover-up could be certain that some of their trucks
would be bombed and others would end up illustrating a
Carlotta Gall article in the New York Times.

* NATO Bombs an Albanian Refugee Column *

The first case the White Book explores is the bombing
of a column of Albanian refugees who, according to
Yugoslav officials, were attempting to return to their
homes when NATO incinerated them.

This internationally reported war crime took place 13
April 1999 near Djakovica in the Kosovo section of
Serbia.

As you may recall, NATO first denied it had bombed the
refugees, suggesting that the slaughter was the work of
Yugoslav forces. In response, the Yugoslav government
brought reporters to the scene. They examined pieces of
missiles and identified US markings.

This was a bit embarrassing, but no problem: NATO
simply changed the official story. According to the new
story, yes, NATO pilots did bomb the refugees, but it
was a mistake. They had attacked military vehicles
responsible for burning an Albanian village and in the
confusion they also bombed a refugee convoy. (Thus the
Serbs, not NATO, were ultimately responsible...)

To back up the new story, NATO held a press conference
in which they played a tape of a voice, supposedly that
of the pilot, explaining the confusion that led up to
bombing the refugee column. Here's how Deutsche
Presse-Agentur reported the NATO press conference:

"*In a tape recording played at the daily briefing at
NATO headquarters, the unidentified NATO pilot* made no
mention of tractors or other signs of civilian life
during the attack.

"He said he was convinced he was targeting Yugoslav
forces responsible for the burning of villages."
--Deutsche Presse-Agentur (our emphasis)
April 15, 1999, "Convoy tragedy 'will not undermine
NATO resolve'"

Because of what NATO would say in their *next* story,
it is important to determine whether the mass media
(such as Deutsche Presse-Agentur) was correct in
reporting that NATO had indeed claimed that the voice
on the tape was the *actual voice* of the *actual
pilot* involved in the attack.

Just to be clear on this, here is an excerpt from the
press conference at which the tape was played. In the
excerpt a reporter asks General Giuseppe Marani some
questions about the supposed pilot's description of the
attack. This part is irrelevant. The important things
to notice are that:

a) by asking a question about what "the pilot said,"
the reporter showed he believed he had just heard a
tape of the *actual pilot who attacked the convoy* and,

b) Note that in response to the reporter's question,
General Giuseppe Marani did *not* say, "that was not
the actual voice of the actual pilot." Instead he also
spoke of what "the pilot said" thus confirming that the
voice on the tape did indeed belong to the pilot who
had dropped bombs on a column of refugees:

[START, Excerpt from "NATO Briefing
Regarding Military Action In Yugoslavia" - 15 April
1999]

"QUESTION: I also note that *the pilot said* that he
saw three dark green, two-and-a-half ton vehicles,
which are obviously not tractors with trailers behind
them or horses and carts. Is there some discrepancy
here? Are we talking about two possible different
incidents?

GEN. MARANI: *The pilot said* he saw the houses burning
on a road north of the road that we are talking about.
[Our emphasis]

[END, Excerpt from "NATO Briefing
Regarding Military Action In Yugoslavia" - 15 April
1999]

Unfortunately for NATO, the tape story also had
problems. First, some of the Western reporters whom the
Yugoslavs brought to the scene of attack actually
reported that they saw no evidence of anything but a
civilian convoy. Second, a few of the reporters
interviewed Albanian survivors who said there were no
military vehicles present. And Serbian TV (RTS) was
broadcasting these facts around the world 24 hours a
day. (RTS was bombed a few days later...)

So NATO did another flip-flop, claiming they had never
meant to say this was the *actual* tape of the *actual*
pilot. Rather, they had only presented the tape as an
*example* of what such a pilot might have said about
such an incident!

This remarkable claim was made by none other than
General Giuseppe Marani, the very NATO spokesperson
who, in the excerpt from the press conference, quoted
above, referred to the tape as being what "the pilot
said"!

Here's the admission that the tape was fiction

[START tortured admission from Agency France Presse]

"Alliance officials admitted that a pilot's statement
they released last week did not correspond to the
specific incident for which NATO has accepted
responsibility.

"This is contrary to what the world's media was given
to believe on Thursday when NATO broadcast a recording
of a pilot talking about how he had taken the decision
to bomb what he believed to be a military vehicle.

"NATO spokesman Brigadier General Giuseppe Marani said
the purpose of the broadcast was 'to clarify the
process of a pilot involved in an action of that type.'

"The alliance had not meant to imply there was 'a
relationship between that pilot and the narrative on
the tape and specific events on the ground.'"
- Agence France Presse, April 18, 1999

[END tortured admission from Agency France Presse]

In the popular image of the "free press," reporters are
hell-bent on exposing wrongdoing by the powers-that-be.
But note, in the real world, the strained gentleness of
AFP's words. Phrases like,

"Alliance officials admitted that a pilot's statement
they released last week did not correspond to the
specific incident [!] for which NATO has accepted
responsibility.

and

"contrary to what the world's media was given to
believe..."

And consider the remarkable headline which AFP gave
this piece. Please keep in mind that, with any news
article, most people read *only* the headline, making
it crucial. What would have been an accurate headline?
How about:

"NATO Admits Pilot Tape a Hoax," or, "NATO Botches
Pilot Tape Lie."

Perhaps you may think of a better headline but we doubt
you can equal the one that AFP came up with. Here it
is:

"NATO pilot was not responsible for bombing of refugee
convoy."

Isn't that wondrous? It manages to be literally true -
that is, since the tape was a hoax it follows that
*that particular* NATO pilot (or whoever was the voice
on the tape!) did not bomb the refugees - while at the
same time communicating a lie - that *NATO* cannot be
held responsible for bombing the refugees.

One might ask, why *did* NATO bomb these particular
refugees?

Yugoslav officials stated that the refugees were
attempting to return home.

According to Kosovo historian Cedomir Prlincevic, in
the spring of 1999 the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA)
fascist-terrorists were attempting to take control of
the clans that exert an all-powerful influence over
Albanians in Kosovo. He explains the special features
of Albanian culture which rendered these centralized
clans especially susceptible to violent coercion. The
text of his interview, "Why Albanians Fled Kosovo
During NATO Bombing," can be read at
http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/keys.htm

According to Prlincevic, the KLA had ordered all
Albanians out of Kosovo. The KLA, and its NATO
handlers, filmed the exodus and, using carefully
selected interviews, convinced the world that the Serbs
were "cleansing" the province of Albanians, thus
seeming to justify the NATO bombing.

The KLA served as bombing spotters for NATO air
attacks. If indeed these Albanians had rejected KLA
orders to vacate and were trying to return home, it is
possible that the KLA called in a NATO air strike as an
object lesson to other refugees who might also be
thinking of returning home. This would explain why, on
a perfectly clear day, NATO bombed what was obviously a
refugee column. The bombing would serve as a warning to
Albanians. The denial would mitigate bad publicity in
the West.

To see the horrifying results of what was perhaps
NATO's object lesson go to
http://www.balkan-archive.org.yu/kosovo_crisis/destruction/white_book2/01.htm

-- Francisco Gil-White & Jared Israel

Note: In case the "White Book on NATO Aggression"
should become unavailable at the url given above, try
the following:
http://www.aeronautics.ru/archive/yugoslavia/milosevic/bela/bela/00.htm

To subscribe to the Emperor's Clothes email list go to
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/f.htm
You will receive texts posted at Emperor's Clothes

Send a link to this article to a friend! If you receive
this article by email, cut and paste this URL into your
browser:

mailto:ENTER FRIEND'S EMAIL ADDRESS HERE?subject=Here's
a great article from emperors-clothes.com!&body=I just
read the following article which I thought you would
find most interesting. Here's the address:
http://emperors-clothes.com/milo/freezer1app.htm

To subscribe to the Emperor's Clothes email list go to
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/f.htm
You will receive texts posted at Emperor's Clothes

Send a link to this article to a friend! If you receive
this article by email, cut and paste the following URL
into your browser:

mailto:ENTER FRIEND'S EMAIL ADDRESS HERE?subject=Here's
a great article from emperors-clothes.com!&body=I just
read the following article which I thought you would
find most interesting. Here's the address:
http://emperors-clothes.com/milo/freezer1app.htm

=======================================

JUDGMENT! Video Exposes the Phony 'Death Camp' Pictures
that Fooled the World...
=======================================

In August 1992, millions of people were shocked to see
photographs of a supposed Bosnian Serb death camp.

The photos were produced by ITN, the British TV news
giant, from footage shot by an ITN film crew which
spent 15 hours in Bosnia.

Most of the photographs featured a tall, painfully thin
man, stripped to the waist, apparently penned in behind
barbed wire.

Travelling with the authorization of Radovan Karadzic,
the Bosnian Serb leader, the ITN crew filmed at a
detention center in Omarska and a refugee center in
Trnopolje. The ITN photos were broadcast worldwide
beginning August 6th, accompanied by sensational
captions and comments.

For example Ian Williams, one of the journalists who
accompanied the ITN crew, appeared on U.S. Public
Television's MacNeil-Lehrer Report on August 6th. Mr.
Williams referred to the Trnopolje refugee center as a
"camp," as in concentration camp, saying it was "at the
center of allegations of atrocities." Williams claimed
that:

"Conditions at this camp were appalling. In 100 degree
heat hundreds of men were forced to eat and sleep
outside in the field behind barbed wire."
-- MacNeil-Lehrer Report, 6 August 1992

And indeed, the ITN photos seemed to show people living
outside, caged like animals behind barbed wire. But Mr.
Williams knew this impression was false. He knew the
Muslim refugees were moving about freely, that it was
the ITN people who were filming from inside a small
barbed wire enclosure. He knew the ITN pictures had
been doctored to create the illusion of a death camp.
This is *proved* in the Emperor's Clothes video,
'JUDGMENT!'

How can 'JUDGMENT!' have proved this?

By luck, a news crew from Serbian State Television
(called RTS) covered the ITN visit. They went wherever
ITN went, filming what ITN filmed and filming the ITN
crew as well. Thus there is a visual record of what the
ITN people did and what they actually saw. Using this
footage, the 'JUDGMENT!' video shows, step by step, how
pictures of a humanitarian refugee center at Trnopolje
were transformed into 'death camp' photos that fooled
the world.

The 'JUDGMENT!' video proves that Ian Williams, now the
UN correspondent for the NATION magazine, and other
journalists who traveled to Bosnia with ITN, lied to
the public.

Mr. Bush Responds with Superhuman Speed

On 6 August 1992, just *20 minutes* after the pictures
were released, George Bush held a press conference at a
Colorado Air Base:

"Reports say that 20 minutes after the ITN footage was
shown in the United States, President George Bush
changed his hands-off policy and promised to 'press
hard for quick passage' of a UN Security Council
resolution authorising the use of force in the
Balkans."
-- "The Straits Times, August 16, 1992
"Holocaust images of Bosnia prison camps make the West
sit up," by Lee Siew Hua

Bush demanded that the Serbs be harshly punished,
including:

"tighten[ing] economic sanctions on Serbia so that all
understand that there is a real price to be paid for
the Serbian government's continued aggression."

Bush also announced that the U.S. would recognize
Croatia, Slovenia and Bosnia as independent from
Yugoslavia. He thus approved the break-up of Yugoslavia
and guaranteed that the Bosnian war would continue.

Consider the remarkable speed with which President Bush
reacted.

Some photos are shown on TV.

Immediately, President Bush contacts his cabinet
members, who, coincidentally, have also seen the
photos.

They confer. Somehow they determine that the pictures
are genuine.

They contact leaders of, at least, Germany and England,
possibly other countries. They plan draconian anti-Serb
measures including economic sanctions that will cut
Serbia off from the world.

They contact congressional leaders. They agree that
Bush will announce the US intent to recognize no fewer
than three new Yugoslav secessionist states.

They call a press conference at a Colorado Air Base.
They write a press release. They compose Mr. Bush's
statement.

The mass media receives the press release. Film crews
travel to the Air base and set up their equipment.

And all this is done in...20 minutes?

Isn't it more likely that the timing of the TV
broadcast of these pictures was coordinated between ITN
and either the State Department, the CIA or some
similar body? That Bush scheduled his press conference
to be held just after the pictures were shown so
ordinary people would believe that these terrible
pictures compelled President Bush to endorse extreme
measures?

Perhaps ITN's trip to Bosnia, supposedly to
"investigate claims that concentration camps had been
set up" (Strait Times), was planned from the outset as
a hunt for footage which could be used to produce such
doctored evidence.

ITN had a prior history of aggressively anti-Serbian
coverage of the break-up of Yugoslavia. So one might
ask, why did the Bosnian Serb leadership give ITN
access to Trnopolje and Omarska, about which the
Western media (for example, NEWSDAY, 21 July 1992) were
already spreading nightmare tales? Perhaps they hoped
that if they just let the ITN people see for
themselves, ITN would be fair. They did not comprehend
the moral standards of the people with whom they were
dealing.

Get a copy of 'JUDGMENT!' If after viewing this video
you don't think we've proved our case we'll refund
every penny.

We cannot bring back the dead. However, we can honor
them by telling the truth.

Instructions to Purchase 'JUDGMENT!' Video


In U.S. - $25.00
Outside U.S. - $26.00 (USD)
[If you can donate more, it will help us cover expenses
and allow us to distribute copies to people who cannot
afford $26, which is a week's wages or more in some
countries.]

BY PHONE - U.S.A. phone number - 1 617 916-1705

BY MAIL - Send check to Emperor's Clothes, PO Box
610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321. USA. (If your check
includes an extra donation, please indicate how many
copies of JUDGMENT! you are buying!)

BY SECURE SERVER - Go to
http://emperors-clothes.com/howyour.html#donate Pay the
appropriate amount as a donation. Then email us at
emperors1000@... so we know you have ordered
'JUDGMENT!'

Or order via PAYPAL

IN USA $25 please go to PayPal at
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=emperors1000%
40aol.com&undefined_quantity=1&item_name=Judgment+
Video+ordered+from+within+United+States&amount=25.00

OUTSIDE USA $26 please go to PayPal at
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=emperors1000%
40aol.com&undefined_quantity=1&item_name=Judgment+
Video+ordered+outside+United+States&amount=26.00

www.emperors-clothes.com or
www.tenc.net

www.tenc.net * [Emperor's Clothes]

This Website is mirrored at http://emperor.vwh.net/ and
at http://globalresistance.com