(Note: the documents are in inverse chronological order)

1. Hague: Outrageous verdict and their way to hide it (22/12/02)
2. ICDSM German Section statement (in English, 18/12/02)
3. PRELIMINARY LEGAL REMARKS OF ICDSM ATTORNEY Ms. TIPHAINE DICKSON,
PRESENT TODAY AT THE HAGUE (18/12/02)
4. Milosevic refuses psychiatric tests (05/12/02)
5. Belgrade protest (by J. Catalinotto, 05/12/02)
6. The Hague requested for information from GB (26/11/02)
7. Milosevic Given Wrong Medicines in the Hague (Reuters 23/11/02)


LINKS

Jurist: UN Tribunal: Milosevic vs. Mayor of Dubrovnik
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/810368/posts



=== 1 ===


Subject: Hague: Outrageous verdict and their way to hide it
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 01:33:45 +0100
From: "Vladimir Krsljanin"

In absence of both - text of the "Trial Chamber" decision and
transcript of December 18 hearings - here is their semi-official
"Overview of Proceedings", quoting basically the words of Richard May
in "last three minutes".
What follows is PR of "Carla style" staged in order to hide the deadly
verdict. Note that UN SC also has a role. Carla insists that "export
of the Presidents" should go on. Carla admits that they don't have a
case against President Milosevic. Carla is angry that her followers in
Belgrade have not produced some "evidence". And Carla wants to help
them by attacking them. How controversial!


OVERVIEW OF COURT PROCEEDINGS

Update No. 248 - 20 December 2002

MILOSEVIC Case ("Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina")
Trial Chamber III - Judges May (Presiding), Robinson and Kwon

12th week of the Prosecution case (only on Wednesday 18 December).
On 18 December 2002, the following witness was examined by the
Prosecution and subsequently cross-examined by the Accused and one of
the amici curiae:
· Witness Petar Poljanic

The Trial Chamber gave its conclusions as to the future conduct of the
proceedings:

1. The trial will proceed according to timetable, due allowance being
made for illness and such rest days as appropriate. There will be no
other extension of time for the Prosecution case.
2. Defense counsel will not be imposed upon the accused against his
wishes in the present circumstances. It is not normally appropriate in
adversarial proceedings such as these. The Trial Chamber will keep the
position under review.
3. The Accused will not be provisionally released, as he has asked,
during the course of these proceedings.

The trial was then adjourned until 9 January 2003.





Press Release . Communiqué de presse
(Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document)

OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR
BUREAU DU PROCUREUR


The Hague, 20 December 2002
FH/P.I.S./ 721-e



ICTY PROSECUTOR, CARLA DEL PONTE ADDRESSES ONCE AGAIN
"THE UNSATISFACTORY CO-OPERATION" OF THE FEDERAL
REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA WITH THE OFFICE OF THE
PROSECUTOR

Please find below the statement delivered by the ICTY Prosecutor, Ms.
Carla del Ponte, at a press conference held at the Tribunal on Friday
20 December 2002:



I regret that I have to address once again the issue of unsatisfactory
co-operation of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia with my Office.

Just two days ago, the President of the UN Security Council on behalf
of the Council issued a statement reminding all relevant States, and
Yugoslavia first of all, to co-operate fully with the ICTY. It was a
result of the Report of the President of the ICTY, Judge Claude Jorda,
to the Security Council regarding non-compliance of Yugoslavia with
its international obligations.

The Presidential statement of the Security Council stresses the
obligation of Yugoslavia to comply with the requests of the Tribunal
for arrest and transfer of indictees, to make witnesses available and
to assist in ongoing investigations. I would like to underline the
paragraph of the statement which "insists that dialogue or lack of
dialogue between the Tribunal and the Governments must not be used by
the States as an excuse for failure to discharge their obligations to
co-operate fully with the Tribunal as required by the UN Security
Council Resolutions".

My statement today is triggered by the fact that the Yugoslav Foreign
Minister and President of the National Council for Co-operation, Mr.
G. Svilanovic refused to speak to me yesterday exactly on the issues
of co-operation. So much for a dialogue. Instead, as reported by the
media and if it is reported correctly, Minister Svilanovic stated that
the Tribunal is "a stone on the neck of Yugoslavia", that
"co-operation with Prosecution was never at the lower level", also
that the "Prosecution betrayed the confidence of the authorities in
Belgrade" and finally that "all co-operation might stop" due to the
wrong assessment of the situation in Yugoslavia by the Prosecution. It
is obviously not my duty to assess the situation in Yugoslavia.

I am truly disappointed by such inappropriate political statement of
the person who is in charge of co-operation with the ICTY. It is also
not true that my Office was asking for general access to all archives
in Yugoslavia. My Prosecution teams have to meet demands of the Trial
Chambers and have to duty to comply with particular schedules. We are
given limited time to present the prosecution case in each trial.
The Requests for assistance and information send to the authorities in
Belgrade are concrete about the documents sought, as it is for
instance clear from the recent Prosecution's application under Rule 54
bis in the Milosevic case. It is clear from this application that
there are number of outstanding Requests, some of which are 20 months
old. The best results and fair results in the criminal trials of such
importance as here in The Hague are only possible to achieve if best
possible documents are made available in timely manner.

The difficulties faced by the Prosecution in Milosevic case with
access to the documents and witnesses came to the point when it was
not possible to wait any longer, while the Trial Chamber had to be
informed about the problems faced by us.
I want to repeat, in the limited time given by the Trial Chamber in
particular case the Prosecution team must bring the most important
witnesses and most important documents before the court.

Finally, I would like to inform you that I sent yesterday a letter to
the Yugoslav authorities in regard to the accused M. Milutinovic to
ensure his surrender to the custody of the ICTY and his transfer to
The Hague immediately upon the expiry of his term of office.

Thank you.


=== 2 ===


Subject: DANGER OF JUDICIAL MURDER - ICDSM German Section statement
(in English)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:15:06 +0100
From: "Vladimir Krsljanin"


DANGER OF JUDICIAL MURDER STILL ACUTE

Press statement issued by the German Section of the
International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic,
18/12/2002

On 18.12.2002, the last day of the "trial" of Slobodan Milosevic
this year, it was announced that "administrative questions"
would be dealt with. In plain language, the issue was Slobodan
Milosevic's state of health and the possibility of him surviving
the trial. The treatment of this matter by the "court" was fully in
line with what one would expect from the cold-blooded
bureaucratic reduction of a matter of life and death to an
"administrative issue". "Judge" May dealt with the matter in less
than three minutes.

Firstly he stated that that the Chamber had received medical
reports and petitions from "the sides". May, certainly not for
reasons of time, withheld the information that these included
submissions from the International and National Committees for
the Defence of Slobodan Milosevic, appeals from US intellectuals
and German doctors and a unanimous resolution from the
Russian Duma [parliament].

He permitted no discussion of the issues but pronounced three
points as a final decision: maintenance of the previously
established schedule "with monitoring" of the health of the
"accused", no imposition of a defence lawyer - which Carla del
Ponte had asked for - since this would be incompatible with the
rules of the "Court", and, thirdly, no temporary release of
Slobodan Milosevic to allow him specialist treatment by his
long-standing doctors.

Thus, despite repeated warnings, notably from medical
specialists, we see the acceptance of severe damage to the health
and a threat to the life of Slobodan Milosevic. All those who
have assumed that, given the disaster of the trial so far from the
legal point of view, the forces behind the "Tribunal" view the
termination of the trial through death as an option which is at
least worthy of consideration, now feel confirmed in that
supposition.

The state of Slobodan Milosevic's health - he suffers from
exceptionally high blood pressure, weak heart muscles,
hypertrophy of the left ventricle and angina pectoris carrying the
risk of sudden death through heart failure - has swiftly
deteriorated in recent months because of the intolerable
conditions of detention and trial. The first examination by a
Dutch cardiologist on 15.11. 02 predicted an 11% reduction in
the risk of death given appropriate medication. On 23.11.02
newspapers and press agencies reported that Milosevic had over
a long period not only not been receiving effective or ineffective
drugs, but had in fact been given contra-indicated drugs which
actually increased his blood pressure.

A group of practising doctors and therapists from Germany,
including members of "International Physicians for the
Prevention of Nuclear War" in their two petitions to the
"Tribunal" have pointed out inter alia that:

"This attitude, which can only be described as irresponsible,
towards a person whose health and life are in your care with all
the consequences flowing from that, raises serious questions as
regards motives. At the very least it is totally at odds with various
UN documents and resolutions concerning the treatment of
prisoners which responsible persons claiming to be
representatives of a UN institution ought of all people fully to
uphold.

The necessary outcome of this situation, for which the ICTY
carries full responsibility, is that Slobodan Milosevic be
immediately released from this health- and life-threatening
situation and set free so that he can receive in Belgrade the long
overdue treatment from the doctors who have treated him for
many years."

By his decision today, Judge May has done more than just ignore
such expert advice. The "Tribunal" is also thereby blatantly
flouting UN General Assembly resolutions and documents
relating to the health of persons in custody, in particular:

* the provisions of UN General Assembly Resolution no. 37/194
of December 1982, which stipulates that "health personnel,
particularly physicians, charged with the medical care of
prisoners and detainees, have a duty to provide them with
protection of their physical and mental health and treatment of
disease of the same quality and standard as is afforded to those
who are not imprisoned or detained".

* Article 6 of the Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials
adopted by the UN General Assembly on 17 December 1979
which obliges all courts to "ensure the full protection of the
health of persons in their custody".

Moreover, the "Tribunal" is violating its own rules, specifically
article 21 point 4b, which stipulates that every defendant shall
have "adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his
defence".

In the view of the International Committee for the Defence of
Slobodan Milosevic, all the above indicates that the trial is
nothing more than an organised attempt to kill Slobodan
Milosevic.

Immediately after this "potential death sentence", representatives
of the International Committee announced that they were
considering legal steps against "Judge" May. In the next few
days, they want the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
in Geneva to intervene so that UN decisions are at last applied in
"Del Ponte's Circus".

Klaus Hartmann

Vice-President ICDSM (International Committee for the
Defence of Slobodan Milosevic)
mailto:vorstand@...

ICDSM http://www.icdsm.org/

ICDSM - German Section http://www.free-slobo.de/


=== 3 ===


International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic (ICDSM)
URL for this article is
http://www.icdsm.org/dickson/td-12-18.htm

Subscribe to our email list at
http://emperor.vwh.net/icdsm/maillist.htm
*Receive articles from the ICDSM Website*

Please send the link to this text to a
friend. Or if you're receiving this
article via e-mail, please forward it to
your friends!

==========================================================
The following report is from Attorney
Tiphaine Dickson, retained by the ICDSM,
writing from The Hague. A full report on
the ICDSM delegation will be forthcoming.
- Jared Israel
[Posted 18 December 2002]
==========================================================

PRELIMINARY LEGAL REMARKS OF ICDSM
ATTORNEY Ms. TIPHAINE DICKSON, PRESENT
TODAY AT THE HAGUE

18 December 2002, The Hague

Earlier today, Trial Chamber III allocated
a few minutes of its timetable to
summarize a decision with respect to
Slobodan Milosevic's health, trial
conditions, and to rule on requests for
provisional release filed by parties.

The full ruling was unavailable to the
public and the press.

On 5th and 12th of November, the ICDSM
petitioned the Chamber for urgent
specialized medical attention (1) and for
the provisional release of Slobodan
Milosevic.(2) On the basis of medical
reports and international law, we argued
that the current trial conditions
constitute a threat to his life, that lack
of adequate medical attention is
tantamount to torture, and requested that
he be afforded the right to urgent,
specialized medical care by physicians
familiar with his history. This requires
provisional release to Belgrade as well as
full convalescence.

The ICDSM further submitted that President
Milosevic's fundamental right represent
himself, and to not have counsel imposed
on him creates an obligation on the
Chamber to accommodate the exercise of
this right by providing conditions other
than those of a grueling trial schedule
with restricted access to his legal
assistants in a prison. We provided the
Chamber with a legal basis upon which to
order Slobodan Milosevic's release for the
continuation of the trial in a
non-custodial setting, following full
convalescence.

Chamber III has today denied provisional
release, and appears, since they affirm
that they will proceed according to their
"timetable", to have denied requests for
an adjournment so that President Milosevic
may obtain specialized medical evaluation
and treatment. They did not mention the
ICDSM's motion or requests.

Trial Chamber III has disregarded the
reasoning of their colleagues in the Talic
matter who stated:

"It would be inappropriate for this Trial
Chamber to wait until Talic is on the
verge of death before considering
favorably his application for provisional
release."
[Note: "Talic" refers to the Tribunal's
proceedings against Radoslav Brdanin and
Momir Talic - JI]

The ICDSM considers that it would also be
"inappropriate" for the Chamber to wait
until these trial conditions cause severe
cardiac complications, stroke, or death
before "considering favorably" an
application for provisional release. It is
also "inappropriate" to wait until
Slobodan Milosevic is on the verge of
death before "favorably considering" a
request for specialized medical attention.

The Chamber stated that "as previously"
they would deny provisional release.
Previously, that is March 6th 2002,
Slobodan Milosevic's health conditions had
not deteriorated as they have in the past
months. Previously, the arguments of the
court-appointed amici took up only four
transcript pages including the following
remark:

"So I'm not insisting on provisional
release and equality of arms, so to
speak".

The ICDSM did not consider that the matter
had been previously argued in an adequate
manner. It appears from the fragment of
the decision to which the public was made
privy [today] that the Chamber has equated
previous requests with current ones. Such
an interpretation would constitute a gross
misapprehension of the facts and the law.

The Chamber did however refuse to impose
counsel on President Milosevic. The ICDSM
is relieved that Slobodan Milosevic's
arguments supporting his right to
represent himself and not to have counsel
imposed on him have prevailed.

Another statement will follow the
disclosure of the full decision.

Tiphaine Dickson
Attorney ICDSM

[Footnotes follow appeal]

==============================
Please consider making a contribution to
the ICDSM!
==============================

You may contribute any amount - $30 $60
$100 $250 $500 or more.

Donate using PayPal. Go to
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=icdsm%40aol.com
PayPal accepts VISA and MasterCard

Send us a check:
ICDSM
831 Beacon St., #295
Newton Centre, MA 02459 (USA)

* Donate at our secure server:
https://emperor.securesites.com/transactions/icdsm.php
You can use VISA, MasterCard or Discover

Donate by credit card over the phone.
ICDSM, USA 1 617 916-1705
Freedom Ass., Belgrade 381 11 3282491 or
381 638 862 301

Thank you!

**********
Footnotes
**********

1) See "Specialists Must Examine Slobodan
Milosevic Now!" at
http://emperor.vwh.net/icdsm/more/specialists.htm

2) See "Full text of ICDSM Motion
Requesting Amicus Curiae Status," at
http://emperor.vwh.net/icdsm/motion.htm

ICDSM
www.icdsm.org

Backup ICDSM Website at
http://emperor.vwh.net/icdsm


=== 4 ===


International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic (ICDSM)
URL for this article is
http://www.icdsm.org/more/refuses.htm

Subscribe to the ICDSM email list at
http://emperor.vwh.net/icdsm/maillist.htm
*Receive articles from the ICDSM*

Send the link to this text to a friend!
Or, if you are receiving this article via
e-mail, please forward the text to your
friends.

==============================
Milosevic refuses psychiatric tests!
Reuters 5 December 2002
[Comments by Jared Israel of ICDSM at end]
[5 December 2002]
==============================

Note from ICDSM: In the Reuters dispatch
below, Hague official Landale says
Slobodan Milosevic has "turned down the
opportunity to have a psychiatric
examination." The amazing word here is,
'opportunity.' You gotta love it.

I will post further comments shortly.

-- Jared Israel

****

REUTERS
The Hague -

Slobodan Milosevic has refused to undergo
a psychiatric examination ordered by
judges at The Hague warcrimes tribunal to
gauge the toll his trial is taking on his
mental health, a court spokesman has said.

Judges last month asked a psychiatrist and
a cardiologist to provide medical reports
on the former Yugoslav leader. Milosevic
has suffered bouts of high blood pressure,
flu and exhaustion since his trial started
in February.

Milosevic is willing to be examined by a
cardiologist, but not a psychiatrist,
tribunal spokesman Jim Landale told
Reuters.

"He turned down the opportunity to have a
psychiatric examination. He made it clear
that he did not wish to have a psychiatric
examination," Landale said.

Milosevic, 61, chose to defend himself
against charges of ethnic cleansing in the
Balkans in the 1990s, in a show of
contempt for the tribunal.

Milosevic's poor health has halted
proceedings five times in nine months,
prompting prosecutors to ask the court to
impose a defence lawyer on him. The former
Serb strongman has accused prosecutors of
trying to gag him.

(c) Reuters 2002 - Posted for Educational
Use Only

* Our Comment follows fund-raising appeal
*

===================================
Help Get the ICDSM
Delegation to The Hague!
===================================

Slobodan Milosevic has defied his captors
once again. Won't you give your support?

Now more than ever the ICDSM needs to get
our delegation to The Hague to back up
Slobodan Milosevic's truly heroic stand.
Your contribution - large or small - can
help get us there.

** Here is How to Make a Donation **

* Make a donation at our secure server. Go
to
https://emperor.securesites.com/transactions/icdsm.php
You can use VISA, MasterCard or Discover

Donate by credit card over the phone. Call
us at:
ICDSM, USA 1 617 916-1705
Freedom Association, Belgrade 381 11
3282491 or 381 638 862 301

Donate using PayPal. Go to
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=icdsm%40aol.com
PayPal accepts VISA and MasterCard

Send us a check at:
ICDSM
831 Beacon St., #295
Newton Centre, MA 02459 (USA)

Thank you!

ICDSM
www.icdsm.org

***

=== 5 ===


http://www.workers.org/ww/2002/milo1205.php


-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Dec. 5, 2002
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

BELGRADE PROTEST DEMANDS RELEASE MILOSEVIC
By John Catalinotto

Efforts to win the release of former Yugoslav President Slobodan
Milosevic from his prison in The Hague have increased since early
November, when dangers to his health became apparent. They include a
demonstration of thousands in Belgrade on Nov. 19.
Milosevic faces charges for alleged war crimes during NATO's wars on
the Balkans. Defending himself since the trial opened last February,
the former Yugoslav leader has often been able to turn the tables on
NATO. What began as a show trial against Milosevic has been virtually
ignored by the establishment media since his self-defense has been
so convincing.
Milosevic, who has heart and high blood pressure problems, has endured
life in a small cell with little chance for exercise or decent food as
he prepares for daylong court sessions with the minimum of legal
assistance. On top of this constant threat to his health, doctors of
the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia gave him
improper medicine earlier in November, according to the Nov. 22 NRC
Handelsblad, a Dutch newspaper.
Called on only a few days' notice, the Nov. 19 protest was on the
occasion of a meeting of United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan
with representatives of the current Yugoslav government. According to
spokespeople for SLOBODA (Freedom), the group calling the action with
the support of the Socialist Party of Serbia, the nationalists and
other patriotic parties, more than 10,000 people took part.
Protesters in this "Liberty for Slobo" rally included the Serbian
nationalist Vojislav Seselj, who is running in the election for the
Serbian presidency against Yugoslav President Vojislav Kostunica.
Milosevic's wife, Mira Markovic, and others from his family were also
present.
Other speakers included a famous basketball player, a bishop, a
professor of medicine and several well-known writers.
Supporters of Milosevic also demonstrated against NATO in Prague with
others protesting the eastward expansion
of the aggressive military pact.
The committee asks that messages demanding proper medical care for
Milosevic and his release from prison be sent to:
Sergio Vieira de Mello, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights,
OHCHR-UNOG, 8-14 Avenue de la Paix, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland;
fax 4122 917 9022; or e-mail tb-petitions@....

- END -


=== 6 ===


Subject: request for information
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:22:47 -0000
From: "canauk" <canauk@...>
To: "Hague Tribunal" <fisk.icty@...>
CC: "Lord Peter Goldsmith QC" <lslo@...>



To the International Criminal Tribunal for
the Former Yugoslavia

The Hague

Holland

From William Spring 1 Scales Rd London
N17 9HB UK

Tel: 0044 208 376 1454

Date: November 26th 2002

by e mail, fax & recorded delivery

Dear Sirs

I am making an application to the UK Courts
for the prosecution of the learned Judge
May, for engaging in the torture of the
prisoner Milosevic, illegally kidnapped from
Yugoslavia & transferred to your Tribunal
without lawful authority, in which situation
the Court under Judge May's presidency has
persisted in inflicting upon the prisoner a
variety of demeaning treatments, including
torture, through such expedients as denying
him proper exercise, food, family visits,
medical treatment, correspondence, access to
legal advisers etc + a number of other
inhuman & degrading procedures.

I have already complained about this
treatment of the prisoner in a letter sent to
Judge May dated November 6th, also sent to
your Court by e mail & fax. (For your
information I paste below this e mail the full
text of the letter of November 6th.)

As Judge May remains an official of the
British Government, being one of Her
Majesty's judges, & as no official of the UK
Government can engage in torture in any
capacity, either in connection with his/her
official duties, or exterior to them, in seeking
the arraignment of the judge I invoke section
134 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, &, of
course, should Mr Milosevic die in your
custody I will press the charge of murder
both against Judge May, & against any other
parties, (resident in The Netherlands or
elsewhere), responsible for the death of the
prisoner Milosevic.

It is clear this prisoner should, either be
released immediately, (a decision which any
competent Court would have taken a long
time ago), or else, @ the very least, if your
honourable Court, with the connivance of the
Netherlands Government, intends to persist
in this ridiculous charade of supposed
international justice, that you should grant
him bail.

I have requested the Law Officers in UK for
the full name & address of Judge May but
have not had a response. I therefore make
this request direct to The Tribunal.

I realise Judge May is outside of the
jurisdiction @ the moment, but should he
return to the UK I hope the Magistrates &
the Attorney General allow the case to go
forward, & we can arrange for the
summonses to be served upon him.

As a variant to requesting Judge May's UK
or Netherlands address, could the learned
Judge please advance an address for service
here in the UK.

I intend to call expert witnesses & a
comprehensive range of specialist testimony.

I trust there will be a prompt reply to this
request.

Failure to acknowledge this communication
will not delay my application which I will
lodge @ Highgate Magistrates Court without
any further notice to your Court, or to the
learned judge.

Yours sincerely


William Spring





To the International Criminal Tribunal for
the Former Yugoslavia

for the attention of Judge May

From William Spring 1 Scales Road London
N17 9HB

6th November 2002

also by fax & post

Dear Judge May,

As you probably don't know, as your officials
haven't told you, I have sent various e mails
to you in the past relating to your role in the
trial of Mr Milosevic.

I am concerned not only @ the indignities
you & your fellow judges routinely inflict
upon the accused, but at indications you
consistently interfere with his defence,
limiting his time, while seeking to protect
dubious witnesses, (as for example when the
well known war manufacturer /CIA agent/ &
Jesuit massacre defender William Walker
appeared before you).

I have looked @ the transcripts, although I
was not in Court myself.

But you should have known & did know how
important the evidence of Walker was, & in
fact you gave him two days to present his
evidence.

But Mr Milosevic you only allowed him 3
hours to cross examine & in the middle of
that cross examination you cut Mr Milosevic
off, as you have done so many times in the
past, @ the very point when Mr Milosevic
was asking questions relating to Walker's
role in his cover up of the murder of six
Jesuit priests in El Salvador in the 1980's.

At that time Walker was employed as a CIA
agent (using US diplomatic cover), running
the contras, useful experience for him prior
to taking over a similar role in Kosovo.

Walker told your tribunal "I made an
inaccurate statement, in hindsight".

Mr Milosevic then pointed out how, when the
KLA was blamed for the killing of the Serb
teenagers in Pec, he had said, " when you
don't know what has happened, it's a lot
more difficult to sort of pronounce yourself
... to this day we do not know who committed
that act."

But Walker did not exercise the same degree
of caution regarding Racak.

At that point you intervened to stop the cross
examination by saying: "your attempt to
discredit this witness with events so long ago
the Trial Chamber has ruled as irrelevant. "

And later:

"This is an absurd question, absolutely
absurd. Now you're wasting everybody's
time."

But the time spent cross examining the
initiator of the Kosovo War was not wasted.

It is vital to get to the truth about the 1999
NATO war on Yugoslavia.

It may be that as a lawyer you don't have any
regard for the truth, by which I mean you
don't regard its pursuit as a priority.

But as a contemporary historian, & as a
concerned citizen, worried @ the waste of
UK taxpayers' money spent funding your
illicit judicial forum, I do.

My point is you have disqualified yourself by
prejudice & bias from any further conduct of
this case.

I have made a formal complaint to the Lord
Chancellor about your conduct of the trial

I refer as well to the failure of The Tribunal
to provide medical facilities for the prisoner,
nor access to family, nor access to lawyers,
nor access to potential witnesses, such as
myself, nor access to advisers, nor access to
telephones & fax machines, nor access to the
Internet, nor even access to a computer.

You give him inedible meals & you deny him
exercise.

You are engaged in torture.

You sneer @ the prisoner - you generally
seek to demean him, you inflict indignities &
gratuitous humiliation upon him.

I believe you & the other UK officials @ the
Court, including Steven Kay, the MI6 agent
drafted in so the prosecution can also take
over the defence, all of you have
systematically conspired to deny the prisoner
a fair trial, both on account of the numerous
rulings you have made against him, & those
you have not, particularly in respect to the
conditions of his unlawful detention.

You are aware how he is being unlawfully
detained, having been kidnapped, i.e. illegally
abducted, (through the complicity of agents
of the British Government, & the RAF) from
the sovereign territory of Yugoslavia.

These agents & the RAF personnel were
acting upon the instructions of Geoff Hoon
MP.

Yet the crime committed over his person you
refuse to rule on.

You have refused to consider the
circumstances by which Mr Milosevic
arrived @ your Court.

You & Stephen Kay are no better than the
Japs, (who were probably quite humane
gaolers of our men on the Burma Road,
compared to the insidious protracted long
term psychological torture you inflict on Mr
Milosevic).

Nothing is worse than the turning of the
planetary moral & legal order upside down,
the bringing of international law into
disrepute, so that those who are actually
criminals, (such as Walker, & NATO satrap
Paddy Ashdown, + the German NATO air
commander, I think his name is Nauman or
something like that, but all of whom were
responsible for the aggression against
Yugoslavia), they are allowed accuse
Milosevic, but they are not held responsible
for their own crimes.

This is absurd.

Now we hear the Americans are planning
another set of show trials, this time for Iraq.

Corrupt Courts, staffed by corrupt judges, &
corrupt prosecutors, travel in the baggage of
the Allies, as the Bourbons travelled in their
baggage in 1815.

Section 134 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
prevents any official of the UK Covt
engaging in torture in any capacity, for
which reason I am sending a copy to this
letter to the Lord Chancellor & to the A-G.

Yours sincerely

William Spring


=== 7 ===


----- Original Message -----
From: Goran Cvetic
To: artel
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 7:29 AM
Subject: Milosevic Given Wrong Medicines in the Hague -
Dutch Paper Report

THE BELGRADE FORUM FOR THE WORLD OF
EQUALS ASKS YOU TO KINDLY PAY ATTENTION TO
THE FOLLOWING NEWS AND TAKE ACTION YOU
DEEM APPROPRIATE.

Posted on Sat, Nov. 23, 2002

Milosevic Given Wrong Medicines in the Hague -Paper


Reuters

THE HAGUE - Wrong medicines given to Slobodan Milosevic in detention
sent his blood pressure shooting up earlier this month, forcing a halt
to his trial, a Dutch newspaper reported on Saturday.

NRC Handelsblad quoted "sources in the (U.N. war crimes) tribunal" as
saying administering the wrong medication had caused blood pressure
problems that triggered the latest in a string of health-related
delays to the former Yugoslav president's war crimes trial.

Tribunal spokesman Christian Chartier dismissed the report.
"The medicines received by Milosevic have not changed at all over the
past month. That means the so-called wrong medications are exactly the
same medications that got him back (in court) last week, " Chartier
told Reuters.

He said Milosevic's medication was discussed recently with a
Belgrade cardiologist familiar with the former Serbian leader's
state of health.

"His assessment was that Milosevic couldn't have been given any better
medication," said Chartier.

Milosevic, 61, has suffered bouts of flu, exhaustion and high blood
pressure. He now faces psychiatric tests amid mounting concern his
dogged refusal to appoint defense counsel is taking its toll on his
health and disrupting the trial.

The landmark trial for alleged atrocities in the Balkans last decade
has been suspended five times because of the accused's health problems
since proceedings began in February.

Milosevic has been held in the tribunal's detention center since he
was sent to The Hague in June 2001.

Chief prosecutor Carla Del Ponte on Wednesday said she opposed a plea
filed by two international lawyers appointed by the court for
Milosevic's release for one year on health grounds, saying he can have
the necessary care he needs in detention.

SCUSA COLLEGA NON VOLEVO ARRESTARTI


COPENHAGEN - La polizia arresta un agente in borghese

E' tutto vero: durante la manifestazione di sabato a Copenhagen, la
polizia danese ha arrestato un poliziotto in borghese. Oltre
l'assurdo, la notizia certifica non solo la pratica
dell'infiltrazione, ma soprattutto quella della provocazione che ha
contrassegnato il contro-vertice. Il portavoce della polizia non ha
avuto il coraggio di specificare il motivo per cui è stato fermato
l'agente, ma già l'ammissione - raro atto di correttezza - ha fatto da
sabato notte della benemerita locale lo zimbello del paese. La polizia
sembra oltretutto l'unica a non riconoscere i suoi uomini in abiti
civili. Durante il corteo veniva infatti allontanato a più riprese un
gruppo di 7 poliziotti che cercavano di passare per anarchici e, con
minimi cambi di look, per disobbedienti. La notizia dell'arresto è
stata data dal tg della sera scatenando scene di risa nei bar
sintonizzati sul notiziario. Non vanno dimenticati gli altri fermi
frutto di una strategia asfissiante di controllo che bloccava anche il
server Catpipe che ospita un'importante rete di contro-informazione.
Pure con questo clima, la stampa locale ha celebrato la manifestazione
come un successo. (a. d'a.)
Tratto da: il manifesto, 17 Dicembre 2002


--- In Ova adresa el. pošte je zaštićena od spambotova. Omogućite JavaScript da biste je videli., "Coordinamento Nazionale per
la Jugoslavia" ha scritto:

GLI INFILTRATI

Per scovare gli infiltrati presenti nelle manifestazioni contro la
guerra e la NATO e' utile «armarsi di macchina fotografica e
telecamera»: lo garantiscono i militanti di Praga, che hanno una certa
esperienza in proposito, avendo notato una massiccia presenza di finti
manifestanti nelle manifestazioni dei giorni scorsi «come già accadde
due anni fa in occasione delle proteste contro Fondo monetario
internazionale e Banca mondiale, quando la stessa polizia ha ammesso
che, su 12 mila manifestanti, c'erano ben 900 infiltrati» ("Il
Manifesto" 21/11/2002 pag. 7).
A cosa servono gli infiltrati? Beh, dipende. Si possono usare per dare
alle forze dell'ordine pretesti per scatenarsi sui manifestanti, come
avvenne a Genova nel luglio 2001; oppure per monitorare i cortei e
determinarne il percorso; oppure per accreditarsi tra i partecipanti
ed infiltrarsi stabilmente nelle attivita' del movimento; oppure per
provocare gruppi di manifestanti e spaccare l'unita' della piazza;
oppure per garantire che in TV non si veda quello che vuole la
maggioranza dei manifestanti, bensi' solamente quello che e' stato
deciso attorno a qualche scrivania.
Nei giorni scorsi a Praga i "compagni infiltrati" tra i dimostranti
anti-NATO hanno fanno un lavorone: travestiti in massima parte da
"tute nere" (i famigerati "black block"), essi hanno monopolizzato
l'attenzione dei media con buffonate parateatrali, ed hanno provocato
ed aggredito i comunisti ed i pacifisti presenti in piazza. Hanno
spedito all'ospedale, con il naso rotto, un militante del PRC di
Bologna ed uno dell'Akel cipriota. Se due anni fa la percentuale degli
infiltrati a Praga sfiorava il 10 per cento, in questa ultima
occasione essi sono stati certamente di piu', vista la rilevanza del
vertice NATO. Sarebbe interessante provare, ogni tanto, a fare una
stima di quanti siano gli infiltrati nelle nostre manifestazioni e
nelle nostre organizzazioni. (I.Slavo)

--- Fine messaggio inoltrato ---

1. "Fearsome Muslim warlord eludes Bosnian Serb forces"
(Toronto Star 16/08/1995)
2. Interview with Hakija Meholjic, president of Social Democratic
Party for Srebrenica
(Dani 22/06/1998)


=== 1 ===


Full Text of Reporter's Account of Evening Spent with Commander of
Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica

URL is
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/oric.htm

Join our email list at
http://emperor.vwh.net/MailList/index.php

Receive articles from Emperor's
Clothes Website

Send the link to this text to a
friend. If you're reading this in
email, please forward this article
to your friends.

* Looking for a gift? See ad at end
of article for JUDGMENT! video
- the movie shown by Milosevic
at The Hague *

==========================================================F
Full Text of Reporter's Account
of Evening Spent with
Commander of Bosnian Muslims
in Srebrenica
[Posted 21 December 2002]
==========================================================

Dear Emperor's Clothes,

Re: "A Rare Glimpse at the
Reality of the Bosnian War "
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/gorazde.htm

Thanks for this little antidote to
the view of the Jugoslavian wars
peddled so assiduously by the
mainstream media! One minor
suggestion: if possible, it would be
nice to have access to the entire
Toronto Star article in which
Nasir Oric boasts about his
"Greatest Hits." That way,
Emperor's Clothes would not
open itself to an accusation of
selective citation....

H. Day
Norway

***

Dear Mr. Day,

The article can be accessed only
on special search engines, those
which archive past news. (E.g.,
Lexis) Therefore, I cannot give a
url. However, here is the full text.

Best regards,
Jared Israel

***

The Toronto Star
July 16, 1995, Sunday, SUNDAY
SECOND EDITION
SECTION: NEWS; Pg. A1
LENGTH: 816 words
HEADLINE: Fearsome Muslim
warlord eludes Bosnian Serb
forces
BYLINE: Bill Schiller Toronto
Star
DATELINE: BELGRADE,
Yugoslavia

BODY:

BELGRADE, Yugoslavia - When
Bosnian Serb commander Gen.
Ratko Mladic swept triumphantly
into Srebrenica last week, he not
only wanted to sweep Srebrenica
clean of Muslims - he wanted
Nasir Oric.

In Mladic's view, the powerfully
built Muslim commander had
made life too difficult and too
deadly for Serb communities
nearby.

Even though the Serbs had
Srebrenica surrounded, Oric was
still mounting commando raids by
night against Serb targets.

Oric, as blood-thirsty a warrior as
ever crossed a battlefield, escaped
Srebrenica before it fell. Some
believe he may be leading the
Bosnian Muslim forces in the
nearby enclaves of Zepa and
Gorazde. Last night these forces
seized armored personnel carriers
and other weapons from U.N.
peacekeepers in order to better
protect themselves.

Oric is a fearsome man, and proud
of it.

I met him in January, 1994, in his
own home in Serb-surrounded
Srebrenica.

On a cold and snowy night, I sat in
his living room watching a
shocking video version of what
might have been called Nasir
Oric's Greatest Hits.

There were burning houses, dead
bodies, severed heads, and people
fleeing.

Oric grinned throughout, admiring
his handiwork.

"We ambushed them," he said
when a number of dead Serbs
appeared on the screen.

The next sequence of dead bodies
had been done in by explosives:
"We launched those guys to the
moon," he boasted.

When footage of a bullet-marked
ghost town appeared without any
visible bodies, Oric hastened to
announce: "We killed 114 Serbs
there."

Later there were celebrations,
with singers with wobbly voices
chanting his praises.

These video reminiscences,
apparently, were from what
Muslims regard as Oric's glory
days. That was before most of
eastern Bosnia fell and Srebrenica
became a "safe zone" with U.N.
peacekeepers inside - and Serbs
on the outside.

Lately, however, Oric increased
his hit-and-run attacks at night.
And in Mladic's view, it was far
too successful for a community
that was supposed to be
suppressed.

The Serbs regard Oric, once Serb
President Slobodan Milosevic's
personal bodyguard, as a war
criminal.

But they don't want to send him to
the international war crimes
tribunal in The Hague,
Netherlands. They want to track
him down and kill him.

The only songs they want sung of
Nasir Oric are funeral dirges.

But that hasn't happened.

Srebrenica, surrounded by 3,000
armed Serbs as it was then, was a
strange town. It held a desperate
kind of life - a life in suspended
animation.

People talked about what they
used to do, or used to be. Or about
what they would do or would
become once they were free
again.

Sleeping beneath the sheltering
sky near Tuzla as Srebrenica's
surviving residents did last week
- after having been driven from
their homes - was not in their
catalogue of expectations.

I remember steep streets lined
with snow and, everywhere,
firewood.

Srebrenica, an old silver mining
town, was built to hold 4,500
residents, but was then crammed
with 22,500. And the overall
pocket, some 14 kilometres wide
by 16 kilometres long, had
swelled to 46,000 in all.

It had the look and feel of an
overcrowded, somewhat
dilapidated, ski resort town.

But it was anything but.

Still, people were friendly. The
face of an outsider, an
unexplained newcomer, came as a
pleasant surprise to them and I
was welcomed into their homes,
served tea brewed on makeshift
firewood stoves, and treated with
kindness.

There was, even then, some
tension in the air about our
Canadian peacekeepers there. But
they were still doing a good job -
even an excellent one - despite
extraordinarily high expectations.

I got into Srebrenica by
convincing Bosnian Serb leader
Radovan Karadzic that the time
was right for a journalist to visit.
None had been allowed for more
than 100 days. People were
wondering what was going on
behind the curtain.

In the end, another journalist
asked to come along. He had a
vehicle, and I didn't. It was a good
trade-off.

But what we smelled there,
besides the smoke of thousand and
one cooking fires, was the slow
death of hope.

No one wanted to admit it was a
hopeless situation. They wanted to
believe that someone, something,
perhaps some extraordinary act of
fate, was going to save them and
their town.

They just didn't know what it was.
And that not knowing ate away at
them, just as their thinning food
supplies, having been choked off
by the Serbs, did.

At the very end of the only real
street that led all the way down
into the town and became, in
effect, main street, I'll always
remember dozens of kids taking
turns whizzing across a pool of
sheer ice, their bottoms protected
by worn pieces of thin cardboard.

We don't use the word "glee"
anymore. But that's what it was
then. Glee on Main Street,
Downtown Srebrenica.

A bit of laughter against the cold.
A bit of glee in the face of
inevitable doom.

(c) The Toronto Star 1992 -
Posted for educational and fair use
only

=======================================
'JUDGMENT!' - The Video
Shown As Evidence at The Hague
Tribunal!
{It can now be shipped gift
wrapped...Order details after text}
=======================================

September 26 was the first day of
the Bosnian part of the Hague trial
against Slobodan Milosevic. That
day Mr. Milosevic showed
excerpts from a video which
demonstrates how the British TV
station, ITN, fabricated evidence
of Serbian death camps in Bosnia.

The video, co-produced by
Emperor's Clothes and reporters
from Serbian Television, is called
'JUDGMENT!' It demonstrates
that the famous Bosnian pictures,
especially the tall, seemingly
starved man behind barbed wire in
a death camp, were a hoax. It was
not a death camp. The Muslim
men were not behind barbed wire.
This is eminently clear from video
footage shot that day and
reproduced in 'JUDGMENT!'
The movie shows step-by-step
how the phony pictures were
created.

The Bosnian pictures had a huge
impact in 1992. Twenty minutes
after they were shown on TV on
August 6th, George Bush Sr. held
a press conference to proclaim a
whole new get-tough policy
against the Bosnian Serbs. This
was followed by a worldwide
media campaign - all based on the
Bosnian pictures.

If we at Emperor's Clothes are
right that these pictures were a
fraud, then the implications are
staggering: the pictures were
staged to justify a coordinated
US/European policy of
demonizing the Serbian people to
justify war. The press conference
was planned to coincide with the
release of the pictures. The
worldwide press campaign against
the Bosnian Serbs was planned in
advance.

You can view the same video Mr.
Milosevic showed at The Hague.
If you conclude that we are not
telling the truth, send the video
back and we'll refund the
purchase price in full. You don't
risk a penny.

You can purchase a copy of
'JUDGMENT!' for $25 in the US,
$26 outside the US. (If you want
gift-wrapping please indicate
whether you'd like 'Christmas' or
'all-purpose' gift paper and add
$2 to the price)

Here's how you can order:

In U.S. - $25.00
Outside U.S. - $26.00 (USD)

Gift wrapping $2.00, please
indicate 'Christmas' or
'all-purpose'.

[If you can donate more, please
do!]

BY PHONE - (U.S.A.) 1 617
916-1705

BY MAIL - Emperor's Clothes,
PO Box 610-321, Newton, MA
02461-0321. USA.

BY SECURE SERVER - Go to
https://emperor.securesites.com/transactions/index.php

Please email
emperors1000@... to say
you ordered 'JUDGMENT!'

BY PAYPAL

IN USA $25 please click on
PayPal.
Or if you are reading this in eamil,
go to PAYPAL order link at
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/paypal.htm

OUTSIDE USA $26 please click
on PayPal.
Or if you are reading this in eamil,
go to PAYPAL order link at
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/paypal.htm

To Subscribe to the Emperor's
Clothes email list go to
http://emperor.vwh.net/MailList/index.php

You'll receive texts posted at
Emperor's Clothes

www.tenc.net * [Emperor's
Clothes]

This Website is mirrored at
http://emperor.vwh.net/ and at
http://globalresistance.com


=== 2 ===


5,000 Muslim Lives for Military Intervention

Dani, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Hercegovina, June 22 1998

Interview with Hakija Meholjic, president of Social Democratic Party
for Srebrenica, by Hasan Hadzic

In your accusations of the state leadership, and particularly of
President Izetbegovic, over a share of the Bosniak blame for the
Srebrenica tragedy, the departure of the Srebrenica delegation to
Sarajevo in September 1993 for talks on the fate of this enclave
cannot be avoided?

The invitation came from President Izetbegovic. At a meeting of the
municipal war presidency we designated the delegation for Sarajevo. We
immediately had some premonition that big issues would be resolved
there because it was the first time we were leaving Srebrenica and we
were provided transport in two helicopters. We exited safely, yet ever
since we had became a demilitarized zone not a single civilian or
military delegation had come to us. It was envisaged that Naser Oric
would be going also, but he did not want to go. We were transported
in armored personnel carriers from Sarajevo airport to the Holiday Inn
hotel. That was the time of the Bosniak Convention, where a decision
was being made on the peace plan and the division of Bosnia. We were
received there by President Izetbegovic, and immediately after the
welcome he asked us: "What do you think about the swap of Srebrenica
for Vogosca [a Sarajevo suburb]?" There was a silence for a while and
then I said: "Mr. President, if this is a done thing, then you should
not have invited us here, because we have to return and face the
people and personally accept the burden of that decision."

So you rejected Izetbegovic's decision?

We rejected it without any discussion. Then he said: "You know, I was
offered by Clinton in April 1993 (after the fall of Cerska and
Konjevic Polje) that the Chetnik forces enter Srebrenica, carry out a
slaughter of 5,000 Muslims, and then there will be a military
intervention." Our delegation was composed of nine people, one among
us was from Bratunac and unfortunately he is the only one not alive
now, but all the others from the delegation are alive and can confirm
this. Since the Convention had started the President entered to
announce us, and when he did it all the present stood up and welcomed
us with an applause as heroes. We had a request, in case the peace
plan was accepted, that Srebrenica be provided a physical link with
Tuzla and not with Gorazde.
Therefore, we asked for Bratunac and Zvornik because a link across the
desolate stretches and mountains did not suit us and we had never been
linked to that area anyway. It was said the President would receive
all delegations, but he accepted them all except ours.

Srebrenica Was Sold

Did you talk to someone else?

Then they somehow judged I was the toughest nut to crack, so Hazim
Rancic, the then chief of the Tuzla police, told me it was the
politicians' stance that I should stay behind for some seven days in
order for us to discuss and agree on something. Then they would
transport me by a helicopter to Zepa and I should then go on foot from
Zepa to Srebrenica. I told them I was to go to Srebrenica because the
people would think I did not want to return. I also told them if they
really wanted it I would go to Zepa from Srebrenica if they would send
a helicopter. Since the people there were already disappointed, during
the trip back we decided not to tell the people we were offered a
swap; otherwise they would understand it as if we were written off. I
can say that, regardless of the mistakes, the municipal presidency was
good and tried to work for the good of the people. We understood
everything clearly. We connected that with the fact that nobody had
organized us for defense since the ruling party surrendered Srebrenica
in April 1992 without resistance. I had been asked then to surrender
weapons because I had organized a unit of my own, but I had refused to
do so. My most difficult moment was when at the departure from
Sarajevo my colleague Adnan Karovic told me: "Hakija, you have been
sold! Please, if Srebrenica does fall, kill my mother, I beg of you.
Just do not let her fall into their hands!"

Even after the fall of Srebrenica in 1995 you had a chance to address
President Izetbegovic?

I requested then that a state commission be formed to examine the
responsibility of the international community, the President, the Army
General Staff, the Second Army corps, our responsibility.... The
people are missing, hey.... He (President Izetbegovic) asked me what I
would achieve with that? Rasim Delic tried to say something, too, but
nobody gave him a chance to speak. I did not interfere, but,
generally, I have a very bad opinion about the majority of the General
Staff members. Never in the history of wars had the people,
"processed" by other armies, been appointed commanders. You spend five
to six months in their prison, then you come through an exchange, and
become a commander. On the second day after Srebrenica fell we heard
on the radio in the woods Rasim Delic calling us to return as the
situation in Srebrenica was normal. That provoked a total confusion.

You had another interesting meeting with the President?

That was immediately after the liberation of Vozuca. I was informed
that the President was waiting in Kozlovac to talk to me. We went
through the complete history of Srebrenica. I told him I was going to
sue him when his power weakens. He asked me again what I was going to
achieve with that. I told him again that an investigation must be
conducted because the people were missing.... He then said: "You know,
these investigations remind me of my own investigation." He meant the
political one he had undergone [1983 trial of Izetbegovic]. I told
him: "There is a difference there, hey, you are an individual, and
there are no more people...."

One of the most puzzling personalities from Srebrenica is the
commander Naser Oric. He has avoided speaking, and the others are
divided in their opinion about him.

I have a normal relationship with Naser. I said that we should all be
held responsible, but as they did not initiate anything that means
Naser is not to blame for anything. All that must be proven. Naser
knows a lot and I told him once he must have been given "something" to
keep quiet. He laughed at that. I told him he would speak sooner or
later. If he was guilty then that should have been proven and he
should have been punished; if not, he should have been kept in the
army or police.... They left the man on the street and now they say he
deals with this or that. Well, he has to do something. Alija is giving
up the people. He is getting rid of the greatest commanders and
fighters.

The Role of Ibran Mustafic

An interesting individual in the Srebrenica story, both the wartime
and the postwar one, is Ibran Mustafic. He has accused everybody else
for the tragedy, yet he is being reproached for rescuing himself
through Serb contacts. Then he founded a new party, after which the
authorities denounced him, and then the authorities sent him to
suppress the revolt of the Srebrenica women. What kind of conclusion
should one draw from all that?

As a deputy of the SDA [Party of Democratic Action] Ibran was a "hawk"
in the prewar assembly. He was not in Srebrenica in the beginning of
the war because he was in Sarajevo. When we advanced well, despite all
our internal disputes, suddenly Ibran came, somewhere from the
woods.... Then he started spreading stories that our army was not
good, so bit by bit there was a split among the soldiers. He wanted
power again, so the SDA split into two camps. One evening someone
attacked him, Hamed Salihovic and Hamed Efendic. Salihovic was killed
then. Ibran was wounded and transported to the hospital. I was the
police chief then and we wanted to carry out an inquiry. But Ibran and
Hamed, as eye-witnesses, did not want to give a statement. Then there
was a session of the municipal assembly at which Ibran asked to be
given a radio set to talk to Momcilo Krajisnik so that Krajisnik could
take him out of Srebrenica.
Naturally, he was not allowed to do that. I connected these facts only
later. Ibran came to "wreck" Srebrenica while we advanced as that did
not suit someone's plan, and I assume that was the SDA's plan. When
Srebrenica fell he went straight to Potocari instead of going with all
of us through the forest. It is difficult to explain how he managed to
get out while the others were killed. Later he gave statements in
Bijeljina that we killed one another. Many people who did not have any
clue as to what the SDA was were killed, yet he went out and arrived
in Sarajevo.
Then again in 1996 Alija invited us to a meeting in the SDA main
office where Ibran stood up and recited a poem: "Alija, without you
the Sun will not shine, without you there will be darkness." And he
cried at the same time. Ibran is the President's man. He openly tells
the people not to return to Srebrenica, and the women who are content
are on his side. Those are the women who receive good money from the
SDA in order not to go there, since it is better for them to talk hot
air and halt the traffic here. All that is a scenario. Srebrenica was
first glorified, then mourned, and, in the end, made odious by taking
people to the streets. The goal of the authorities is to discredit us
in the face of other citizens of Bosnia-Herzegovina so that they say
we are savages and that the authorities should do to us what they have
been doing.

What is the position of your minister, Adib Djozic?

Before the war Adib Djozic spoke on the Srebrenica radio station
protecting Goran Zekic, a Chetnik leader, who we had denounced as
an organizer of Chetnik training. Upon his arrival to Tuzla in the
beginning of the war Djozic presented himself as a founder of the SDA,
organizer of the uprising, and the like. The best illustration of what
kind of person he is, is one detail regarding the petition that
thousands of Srebrenica people signed against him. He then came to the
premises of the Srebrenica municipality in Tuzla and said: "Dear
people, I was called by President Izetbegovic, who asked me if I could
'wreck' Srebrenica, and if I could, then I would be a minister. I
promised I could." That took place in front of a large number of
witnesses.

You are now in the SDP [Social Democratic Party of Bosnia-Herzegovina]
and in that political framework you have been trying to do something
for the return of refugees. How does it go?

I have a reason to trust the people like Bogic Bogicevic, Nijaz
Durakovic, Zlatko Lagumdzija, Mirsad Djapo, and many others. They
have proved that they are most sincerely for Bosnia-Herzegovina as a
normal state. For me, Bosnia-Herzegovina without my Srebrenica does
not exist and my biggest goal in life is to return. The current
authorities have shown thousand of times so far that they do not want
that.

[Note: even if we don't agree with the conservative, anticommunist
standpoint of Antiwar.com, we think some articles - like the following
- are worth reading. CNJ]


http://www.antiwar.com/malic/m-col.html

December 19, 2002

More Dirty Lies
Courtesy of The Hague Inquisition

Just recently, this column examined the many facets of falsifying
history, noting in passing the role of the Hague Inquisition in
currently the largest such effort in the world. Indeed, the ICTY is an
endeavor more massive even than the current campaign to conjure a
reason for invading Iraq, and it seeks not merely to modify history,
but to rewrite it wholesale.

Lubyanka, not Nuremberg

Its main thesis, that Slobodan Milosevic and other Serb leaders
organized a vast conspiracy, a "joint criminal enterprise," to murder,
expel or conquer other Balkan peoples and "defy the West" in the
process, is a transparent attempt to recast Balkans actors as
modern-day Axis and Allies. In this production, Slobodan Milosevic is
starring as Hitler, his fellow Serbs as Nazis, and Albanians, Croats
and Bosnian Muslims as their innocent victims, while the ICTY invokes
the spirit of Nuremberg.

Apart from this being a deeply ironic role reversal from the original
production, which ran in blood from 1941 to 1945, the "Tribunal?s"
methods and practices reflect far more the Soviet show trials of the
Stalin era. It doesn't help that the accused are presumed guilty until
proven innocent, just like those in Lubyanka, or that its "holding
facilities" in Scheveningen were used by the Nazis to imprison Dutch
patriots.

For almost a year, however, Milosevic has been making a mockery of the
prosecutors' efforts to railroad him. He has successfully demolished
every witness and every argument brought out against him, while
refusing to recognize either the Inquisition's authority or its rules.
Milosevic's outspoken defense made a striking contrast to the
conquered Balkans, where the Empire had managed to silence virtually
all the voices of dissent and resistance.

Beria's Heirs

Having failed in a head-on confrontation, despite playing with heavily
loaded dice, the Inquisitors tried a different route. In September,
they managed to extort a confession from a former Bosnian Serb leader,
Biljana Plavsic, in which she not only admitted to participating in
the planning of atrocities, but also implicated Milosevic and other
Serb dignitaries.

Bits of Plavsic's plea cited by the media sound like they were written
by the prosecutors:

[She] acknowledged she covered up crimes, ignored widespread
allegations of criminal acts and "publicly rationalized and justified
the ethnic cleansing of non-Serbs" in a document setting out facts
underpinning her guilty plea.

"Mrs. Plavsic embraced and supported the objective of ethnic
separation by force and contributed to achieving it," said the
document admitting her role in killings, expulsions and cruelty
inflicted by Bosnian Serbs on non-Serbs in 1992. (Reuters)

It's as if the Inquisitors took lessons in purging "traitors to the
Party" directly from Lavrenti Beria's NKVD. Such extorted confessions
are part and parcel of any show trial, but even the ICTY has not been
this blatant before.

Why Plavsic confessed is a mystery. She claims it was remorse, and
that Serbs committed crimes out of fear, but both explanations sound
more pathetic than reasonable. She does have a strong dislike for
Milosevic, and she enthusiastically collaborated with Bosnia's NATO
occupiers between 1996 and 1998. Plavsic's true motives may be an
enigma, but the Inquisition's are not. They have seized upon the
confession to re-launch allegations of Nazi-like conduct by the Serbs,
while "rewarding" Plavsic with a "lenient" sentence of life
imprisonment.

'Nazi' Slander Resurrected

The assault came this week, at Plavsic's sentencing hearings. One of
the Inquisitors' star witnesses was no other than Madeleine Albright.
The former U.S. Secretary of State has never tried to hide her
Serbophobia, nor has she ever expressed an ounce of remorse for
masterminding the criminal act of NATO aggression in 1999, which led
to the present occupation of Kosovo. In fact, she has been outright
proud of it, as well as of her support in establishing the
Inquisition.
Albright was supposed to testify to Plavsic's willingness to
collaborate with the NATO occupiers, but also to provide the
association between the alleged Serb crimes and the Holocaust. Events
in Bosnia were "reminiscent of pictures that reminded one of World War
II," she said, adding, "We saw pictures of people being taken into
what could only be labeled as concentration camps."

Reinforcing the Nazi analogy further was Holocaust celebrity Elie
Wiesel. Even during the war, Wiesel sided with the Bosnian Muslim
campaign to depict their side as the victim of "Serb Nazis," despite
the fact that many Muslims joined the actual Nazis sixty years ago.
Since he neither knew Plavsic or possessed intimate knowledge of the
alleged atrocities in Bosnia, Wiesel's testimony was intended purely
for emotional value in absence of real arguments.

In case anyone missed the point, the prosecutors then showed the
pictures of emaciated Muslims in Serb "death camps," recycling that
1992 canard long after its expiration date. The photo, actually
depicting a tuberculosis-ridden Muslim standing in front of a
chicken-wire fence with barbed-wire top, was debunked as a malicious
camera trick by 1997.

Trotting Albright to the stand, invoking Wiesel's fame and recycling
trashy propaganda photos only goes to show that, while the
Inquisition's vitriolic assault on Serbs as "genocidal Nazis" shows no
sign of slowdown, the actual case against Plavsic - or Milosevic, for
that matter - is pretty much nonexistent. The only "joint criminal
enterprise" is between them, NATO and the Empire.

Champions of Falsehood

But that is not all. Having long since collapsed into itself under the
burden of lies and fabrications, like a black hole, the ICTY attracts
ever more such material from all over the world. The following two
cases come from the UK, but there is plenty of hypocrisy to go around.

As the Plavsic hearings unfolded and the Milosevic trial continued,
the London Guardian published a tear-jerking piece by Jadranka Cigelj,
a "rape victim" of a "Serb death camp." Cigelj's passionate diatribe
is a masterpiece of propaganda. It blames Milosevic for horrendous
atrocities without a shred of evidence, while also damning the "West"
for its supposed inability to stop him then, or punish him now.

Though an author of a book about her alleged ordeal (for it was never
proven in court), and a prominently featured celebrity victim,
Jadranka Cigelj is also a high official of the Croatian Democratic
Union (HDZ), party of the late Croatian president, ardent Serbophobe
and Holocaust revisionist Franjo Tudjman. She also worked for the
Croatian Information Center, a propaganda arm of the HDZ aimed at
Western reporters, and single-handedly provided most of the "evidence"
for stories of mass rape and genocide in Bosnia, none of which have
ever been proven. In other words, Ms. Cigelj is a professional
propagandist and a committed Croatian national-socialist. Her story,
however tempting, ought to be taken with healthy skepticism.

Speaking of accomplished propagandists, one cannot ignore the real
champion in the category, the London-based Institute for War and Peace
Reporting. Their take on reporting about the Inquisition simply reeks
of falsehoods. They dare use such terms as "hate speech,"
"misconceptions" and "negative propaganda," even as their own
coverage is nothing but. One look at their Balkans report page is
enough: tabloid-style headlines heading columns of malicious drivel.
Lascivious services of media hacks have been a powerful factor in the
rise of the modern repressive State, but IWPR has taken shameless
prostitution of journalism to a whole new level.

Truth? You Can't Handle the Truth!

It is disturbing to see the ease with which outlandish concepts such
as the "Tribunal" itself and the outrageous lies it peddles are
accepted by the general public in the Empire and elsewhere. But the
sad fact of human nature is that violations of truth and justice are
seen as somehow less despicable the more they are committed.

The sheer gall of the violators seems to know no bounds. One of the
Inquisitors actually said, "It is only through the establishment of
the truth that the unhealthy shackles of revisionism that debilitate
the former Yugoslavia and that foster suspicion, ethnic hatred and
civil unrest can be broken."

Everything in this sentence is a lie. The Inquisition does not
establish truth, but rather forges those very shackles of revisionism,
making sure that the debilitating miseries of former Yugoslavia are
perpetuated!

Burden of Fiction

Since its illegal inception in 1993, the "International Criminal
Tribunal" has faithfully pursued its one and only purpose: to serve
the Empire's interests in the Balkans. It has done so in part by
usurping the authority of sovereign states and subverting
international treaties and accords, but its focus has been on
fabricating a recent history of the Balkans that would justify
Imperial intervention, occupation and war.

What makes the ICTY's lies and hypocrisy so hard to swallow is the
fact that many Balkans atrocities they claim to be prosecuting
actually happened - but not in the way they present them, and not to
the degree alleged by the combatants or the media. By manipulating
very real crimes into false history, the Hague Inquisition is
poisoning the well of collective memory for generations to come.

Driven by their demented obsession to falsify facts by casting Serbs
(and sometimes others, for the sake of "diversity" and political
expedience) as evil incarnate, the Inquisition and its patrons have
come to willfully ignore reality. And in reality, their actions have
disastrous consequences, perfectly exemplified in the recent terrorist
attack on Pristina's Bill Clinton Avenue, and the situation in Kosovo
in general.

Those who seek to control things that by nature cannot be controlled
are doomed to fail. When the truth finally emerges, and it has a nasty
habit of doing so when least expected, there will be Hell to pay.

Nebojsa Malic

PROVERBIO SLAVO

"Vidila zaba da se konja kuje (potkiva) pa i ona digla nogu"

(Quando vide che il cavallo veniva ferrato, anche la rana alzò la
gamba)


Dedicato all'Ungheria, che ha accettato che la base militare di
Taszar - già usata per le operazioni di "peacekeeping" antijugoslavo -
sia usata per addestramento di truppe ausiliarie della NATO, e che ha
zelantemente richiesto agli USA di partecipare alla aggressione contro
l'Iraq. Vedi:
http://it.groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/message/2179

International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic (ICDSM)

URL for this article is
http://www.icdsm.org/more/gorazde.htm

Subscribe to our email list at
http://emperor.vwh.net/icdsm/maillist.htm
*Receive articles from the ICDSM Website*

Please send the link to this text to a friend. Or if
you're receiving this article via e-mail, please
forward it to your friends!

==================================================
A Rare Glimpse at the Reality of the Bosnian War
-- Associated Press Article
-- Comments by Jared Israel
[Posted 18 December 2002]
==================================================

During the trial of ex-Bosnian Serb official Biljana
Plavsic, Madeleine Albright and Elie Wiesel made
speeches about the supposedly monstrous Bosnian Serbs.
They portrayed Bosnian Muslims as analogous to Jews and
Bosnian Serbs as analogous to Nazis. As I shall
demonstrate in an upcoming article on that trial, what
Albright and Wiesel said amounts to Holocaust denial.
In addition, I will demonstrate that in his so-called
testimony, Mr. Wiesel lied.

Anyway, while researching Elie Wiesel's earlier
statements about Yugoslavia, I happened to read a most
revealing 1992 Associated Press (AP) dispatch. It is
posted below.

The AP dispatch is notable for three reasons:

1) It describes an all-out attack on the Serbian
civilian population in and around the Bosnian town of
Gorazde.

Prior to the attack, there had been sustained fighting
between Bosnian Serb troops and Muslim military forces
who controlled the town of Gorazde which had a mixed
Muslim/Serb population. The Serbian troops withdrew as
a peace gesture. After that, on August 26th, a column
of cars and buses including:

"3,000 Serbs, mostly women and children, was ambushed
by Muslims at Gnjila canyon, 11 miles north of
Gorazde."

The attackers were merciless:

"People were trapped in their burning cars. Others
crawled looking for their relatives, or jumped down the
cliff in panic," she said, standing frozen next to the
grave of her 11-year-old son, Dragan, who was killed in
the ambush."

The AP dispatch was published on September 12th, that
is, 17 days after the attack. Yet up until then,

"No one has dared to remove the remaining corpses,
fearing another attack from nearby forests."

The attack was not limited to the one gruesome ambush:

"After the Serb forces left their positions on the
hills above Gorazde, Muslim residents, 70 percent of
the town's prewar population of 40,000, looted and
torched the houses of fleeing Serbs, witnesses said."

This AP dispatch is unusual in that it actually
*mentions* the attack on these Serbs. Mostly the media
was silent when Serbs were attacked. As we shall show
in a soon-to-be-published article by Prof. Francisco
Gil-White, in fact it was the Serbs and also their
moderate Muslim allies who were the main victims of
anti-civilian terror in Bosnia. This was not because
the Serbs were saints. It was because the people whom
they and their Muslim allies were fighting were
fanatical Islamic Fundamentalists, misportrayed in the
Western media as peace loving, moderate democrats. But
all that is discussed in Prof. Gil-White's forthcoming
article. (When posted, it will be at
http://www.icdsm/more/bsn.htm

The point here is: this AP dispatch stands out because
it at least reports the anti-Serb atrocities.

2) But even this article reveals anti-Serb media bias.
From the start the article refers to anti-Serb violence
as "revenge." Revenge for what? What does the AP claim
happened to provoke such "revenge"? The article gives
no details, saying only that the town had been under
siege.

By using the terms, "siege" and "revenge," the writer
creates the impression that monstrous crimes must have
been committed *by the Serbs* because how else could
what the Muslims did constitute "revenge"?

Let us consider this a bit more.

The article says the Muslims outnumbered the Serbs in
the Gorazde area, 70% to 30%. A 30% minority is
probably not in a position to terrorize a 70% majority.
Moreover, this particular majority included people who
were armed and prepared to carry out the sort of
atrocities described in the AP dispatch.

Supporting this point, the AP uses the term, "siege."
If Gorazde was under siege *from Serbian forces* then
it must have been controlled *by Muslim forces.* So:
the town had a mainly Muslim population; it was
militarily controlled by Muslims; some of them were
quite capable of carrying out massacres. This hardly
sounds like a situation in which the Serbian forces
would feel safe in provoking the Muslims, even if they
wanted to.

Moreover, as the article states, the Serbs withdrew
their forces as a peace gesture. Would they have done
so without first rescuing the Serb civilian inhabitants
of Gorazde if, having committed outrages, they had
every reason to expect anti-Serb "revenge?"

The withdrawal of Serbian troops, the coordinated
assault on the Serbian neighborhoods, the desperate
flight of columns of cars and buses without troops to
protect them, the ambush and the extreme violence all
suggest that a) the Serbs naively misestimated their
foes' capacity for terror and b) after the troops
withdrew, the Serbian civilians were caught unaware by
the anti-Serb attack and fled in disarray.

The comments of a Serbian man supports this view:

"'The decision to give up Gorazde is a treason.
Karadzic should be ashamed,' said 68-year-old Marko
Ratkovic, who *managed* to flee to Mladenovac, 75 miles
northeast of Rogatica, in neighboring Serbia." (My
emphasis. Note the word, "managed." That suggests he
was caught unaware. That suggests he had no reason to
expect "revenge.")

And a Serbian military official says: "'Muslims have
abused our peace gesture by launching attacks on
innocent civilians.'"

Based on all of the above, I would suggest this
hypothesis: the presence of Serb military forces near
Gorazde *prevented* atrocities against Serbian
civilians. When the Serbian military withdrew, the
extremists among Muslims launched a pogrom: ambushes,
horrific murder, torching and looting of houses,
slaughter of livestock.

3) Speaking of livestock, note that the article
describes the attackers as having slaughtered pigs in
the Serbs' yards. The Bosnian Serbs were/are mostly
peasant farmers, many of whom do indeed breed pigs.
This is an important detail. Let me explain why.

The AP dispatch states that, "The Serb forces hold
about two-thirds of Bosnia's territory." It was common
for the Western media to make such statements,
suggesting that the Serbs had *seized* most of Bosnia,
i.e., they were aggressors.

A small point that the media neglected to mention was:
the Serbs *owned and occupied* roughly 2/3 of Bosnia.

Before the fighting broke out in Bosnia, the Slavic
*Muslim* population was comprised mainly of city
dwellers. The Slavic *Orthodox* population was
overwhelmingly farmers.

Because farming is land-intensive, in 1991 the Serbian
population owned about 2/3 of the land in Bosnia - that
is, they owned the land they lived on and farmed.
Bosnian Serb farmers were important food producers for
Yugoslavia and other European countries.

(We'll soon post an ethnic map of Bosnia that
demonstrates this.)

During the Bosnian conflict, many media reports
included sentences like the following, taken from a
different Associated Press dispatch:

"During the first two years of the war, Serb forces
took about two-thirds of Bosnia-Herzegovina, with the
Muslim-led government controlling the remainder." (AP,
October 27, 1994,

In fact, by limiting their military presence to the 2/3
of Bosnia where Serbs and their Muslim allies were
concentrated, the Bosnian Serb army was demonstrating a
defensive strategy. As Prof. Gil-White's article will
show, the Bosnian "Government" army was Islamic
Fundamentalist. One 6000-man division was named after
the World War II Waffen SS Division, Handzar, which
means "scimitar." These Fundamentalist troops, often
trained and led by fanatical veterans of the Afghan war
of the 1980s, preyed on Serbian peasants.

One such detachment controlled the town of Srebrenica.
Its leader was Nasir Oric, a Yugoslav Islamist. Here is
a Toronto Star reporter's account of an evening spent
listening to Oric boast about slaughtering Serb
farmers:

[Start Toronto Star Quote]

...I sat in his living room watching a shocking video
version of what might have been called Nasir Oric's
Greatest Hits.

There were burning houses, dead bodies, severed heads,
and people fleeing.

Oric grinned throughout, admiring his handiwork.

"We ambushed them," he said when a number of dead Serbs
appeared on the screen.

The next sequence of dead bodies had been done in by
explosives: "We launched those guys to the moon," he
boasted.

When footage of a bullet-marked ghost town appeared
without any visible bodies, Oric hastened to announce:
"We killed 114 Serbs there."

Later there were celebrations, with singers with wobbly
voices chanting his praises.

These video reminiscences, apparently, were from what
Muslims regard as Oric's glory days. That was before
most of eastern Bosnia fell and Srebrenica became a
"safe zone" with U.N. peacekeepers inside - and Serbs
on the outside.

[End Toronto Star Quote]

Note the sentence: "These video reminiscences,
apparently, were from what Muslims regard as Oric's
glory days." Oric's glory days! When he could raid
Serbian villages with impunity, cutting off heads and
launching people to the moon. His *glory* days! And the
Fundamentalist monsters who committed these crimes were
portrayed as moderate democrats by the Western media.

Note also that Oric curtailed his raids *because of the
increased strength of Serbian military forces*!

What the Western media called "laying siege to Muslim
towns," was in fact the heart of Serb military
strategy: to have sufficient military presence to
protect civilians from being slaughtered by the Islamic
Fundamentalist army.

Here's the AP dispatch on Gorazde.

-- Jared Israel

==========================================================
September 12, 1992, Saturday, AM cycle
SECTION: International News

LENGTH: 660 words

HEADLINE: Serb Refugees Face Bloody Muslim Revenge

BYLINE: By DUSAN STOJANOVIC, Associated Press Writer

DATELINE: ROGATICA, Bosnia-Herzegovina

BODY:
Charred human skeletons, decomposing corpses and
burned-out cars are the grim remnants of a Muslim
assault on a column of Serb refugees fleeing
war-ravaged Gorazde.

When Serb forces on Aug. 26 eased their four-month
siege of the town in southeastern Bosnia, most of
Gorazde's Serb inhabitants tried to escape. Many feared
retaliation by majority Muslims who had been under
Serbian guns during the siege.

At dawn the next day, one of the columns of cars and
buses carrying 3,000 Serbs, mostly women and children,
was ambushed by Muslims at Gnjila canyon, 11 miles
north of Gorazde. Witnesses said at least 50 people
were killed and many more injured. Others managed to
escape the hail of bullets and grenades by jumping down
the steep rocky ravine or by hiding in bushes and
woods, they said.

"It was like hell. Everyone was screaming as people and
children, some cut in half by volleys of bullets,
stumbled all over the place," said Dragica Gavrilovic,
one of the refugees.

"People were trapped in their burning cars. Others
crawled looking for their relatives, or jumped down the
cliff in panic," she said, standing frozen next to the
grave of her 11-year-old son, Dragan, who was killed in
the ambush.

She said she carried Dragan's body so she could bury
him in Rogatica.

"Many others were not that lucky. They had to leave
their dear ones behind," Gavrilovic said.

Evidence of the massacre was still visible two weeks
after the ambush. No one has dared to remove the
remaining corpses, fearing another attack from nearby
forests.

Skeletons sat in burned-out cars, and decomposing
corpses lay on the side of the dusty road. Stray dogs
were eating the remains.

Many Western governments and international
organizations, including the United Nations and the
European Community, have blamed Serb forces for much of
the violence in the civil war that has killed
thousands. The Serb forces hold about two-thirds of
Bosnia's territory.

But rival Muslims and Croats have also come under
increasing international criticism for crimes and human
rights abuses, including "ethnic cleansing" of
territories under their control.

"Ethnic cleansing" is the term used to describe the
expulsion of people to create ethnically homogeneous
areas.

After the Serb forces left their positions on the hills
above Gorazde, Muslim residents, 70 percent of the
town's prewar population of 40,000, looted and torched
the houses of fleeing Serbs, witnesses said.

Almost every building, including Serb Orthodox
churches, has been torched in the Serb quarter on the
southeastern bank of the Drina River that divides
Gorazde, a trading center about 35 miles southeast of
the Bosnian capital Sarajevo.

Pigs with slashed throats sprawl in yards belonging to
Serbs.

The move to loosen the siege on Gorazde coincided with
an international London peace conference in which all
warring groups participated. The decision by Bosnian
Serb leader Radovan Karadzic angered local Serb
warlords - and those who had to flee.

"Muslims have abused our peace gesture by launching
attacks on innocent civilians. We may have to
counterattack to regain the territory," Dusan Kornjaca,
the commander of Serb forces, said in an interview.

The Serbs still hold sway on the approaches to Gorazde.

In Rogatica, heavy cannon and machine-gun fire could be
heard from the direction of Gorazde as trucks towing
howitzers headed there.

"The decision to give up Gorazde is a treason. Karadzic
should be ashamed," said 68-year-old Marko Ratkovic,
who managed to flee to Mladenovac, 75 miles northeast
of Rogatica, in neighboring Serbia.

"All of us here have lost at least one family member in
this brutal war. It has to stop before we all
exterminate each other," said Ruza Blagojevic, one of
about 200 Gorazde Serbs who settled in the Mladenovac
refugee center after a harrowing journey.

She said when a charity organization offered them
clothes, all the women chose black - for mourning.

(c) AP 1992 - Posted for educational and fair use only

=======================================
'JUDGMENT!' - The Video Shown As Evidence at The Hague
Tribunal!
{It can now be shipped gift wrapped...Order details
after text}


=======================================

September 26 was the first day of the Bosnian part of
the Hague trial against Slobodan Milosevic. That day
Mr. Milosevic showed excerpts from a video which
demonstrates how the British TV station, ITN,
fabricated evidence of Serbian death camps in Bosnia.

The video, co-produced by the Emperor's Clothes website
and reporters from Serbian Television (RTS), is called
'JUDGMENT!' It demonstrates that the famous Bosnian
pictures, especially the tall, seemingly starved man
behind barbed wire in a death camp, were a hoax. It was
not a death camp. The Muslim men were not behind barbed
wire. This is eminently clear from video footage shot
that day and reproduced in 'JUDGMENT!' The movie shows
step-by-step how the phony pictures were created.

The Bosnian pictures had a huge impact in 1992. Twenty
minutes after they were shown on TV on August 6th,
George Bush Sr. held a press conference to proclaim a
whole new get-tough policy against the Bosnian Serbs.
This was followed by a worldwide media campaign - all
based on the Bosnian pictures.

If we are right that these pictures were a fraud, then
the implications are staggering: the pictures were
staged to justify a coordinated US/European policy of
demonizing the Serbian people to justify war. The press
conference was planned to coincide with the release of
the pictures. The worldwide press campaign against the
Bosnian Serbs was planned in advance.

You can view the same video Mr. Milosevic showed at The
Hague. If you conclude that we are not telling the
truth, send the video back and we'll refund the
purchase price in full. You don't risk a penny.

You can purchase a copy of 'JUDGMENT!' for $25 in the
US, $26 outside the US. (If you want gift-wrapping
please indicate whether you'd like 'Christmas' or
'all-purpose' gift paper and add $2 to the price)

Here's how you can order:

In U.S. - $25.00
Outside U.S. - $26.00 (USD)

Gift wrapping $2.00, please indicate 'Christmas' or
'all-purpose'.

[If you can donate more, please do!]

* Send us a check:
ICDSM
831 Beacon St., #295
Newton Centre, MA 02459 (USA)

* Donate at our secure server:
https://emperor.securesites.com/transactions/icdsm.php
You can use VISA, MasterCard or Discover

* To order by phone call
ICDSM, USA 1 617 916-1705
Or in Netherlands, call 31 20 6151122

* To order by PayPal:

Shipped within USA, $25


PayPal

Or if you are reading this in eamil, go to PAYPAL order
link at
http://www.icdsm.org/paypal.htm

Shipped outside USA, $26


PayPal

Or if you are reading this in eamil, go to PAYPAL order
link at
http://www.icdsm.org/paypal.htm

www.icdsm.org

http://www.resistenze.org/
popoli resistenti - jugoslavia - 12-12-02
http://www.resistenze.org/sito/te/po/yu/poyu2n12.htm


Si informa che è disponibile il nuovo numero di

"Yugoslavia Notizie" Dicembre 2002 n. 10

16 pagine di informazione a cura del Comitato Yugoslavia di Torino

In questo numero:

"Il paese di cui non si parla più"
Il "punto" sulla situazione in Yugoslavia di Michel Collon

Notizie da Serbia, Croazia e Macedonia

Pancevo, a tre anni dalle bombe della Nato

Riconosciuta ufficialmente la contaminazione da U238 in Bosnia

Informativa dell'Ass. "S.O.S. Yugoslavia"

Appello del Comitato per la difesa di S. Milosevic




Per averlo rivolgersi a 338/1755563 o posta@...

TITOGRAD!

Si e' festeggiato oggi a Podgorica, con alcune iniziative pubbliche,
l'anniversario della liberazione della citta', che nel dopoguerra fu
rinominata Titograd in onore del piu' grande artefice della resistenza
antifascista e della liberazione della Jugoslavia intera dagli
invasori nazifascisti e dai loro alleati locali.
Nel corso della Seconda Guerra Mondiale la capitale montenegrina era
stata bombardata ben 84 volte, risultando tra le citta' europee piu'
devastate dalla guerra. Il martirio di Podgorica era iniziato nel 1941
con l'occupazione coloniale italiana, occupazione oggi rimossa dalla
nostra memoria storica e dalla nostra coscienza lurida di
neo-colonizzatori dei Balcani.
(I. Slavo)

1. Exclusive: Legal Remarks of ICDSM Attorney, directly from the
Hague (SLOBODA 18/12)
2. NATO AND NATOITES ATTACK FREEDOM - actual briefs from The Hague
(SLOBODA 18/12)
3. German doctors' reply to Jorda (13/12)
4. SLOBODA Teaches ICTY President Ethics and Law (12/12)

=== 1 ===

PRELIMINARY LEGAL REMARKS OF ICDSM ATTORNEY Ms. TIPHAINE DICKSON,
PRESENT TODAY AT THE HAGUE


18 December 2002, The Hague


Earlier today, Trial Chamber III allocated a few minutes of its
timetable to summarize a decision with respect to Slobodan
Milosevic's health, trial conditions, and to rule on requests for
provisional release filed by parties.

The full ruling was unavailable to the public and the press.

On 5th and 12th of November, the ICDSM petitioned the Chamber for
urgent specialized medical attention and for the provisional release
of Slobodan Milosevic. On the basis of medical reports and
international law, we argued that the current trial conditions
constitute a threat to his life, that lack of adequate medical
attention is tantamount to torture, and requested that he be afforded
the right to urgent, specialized medical care by physicians familiar
with his history. This requires provisional release to Belgrade as
well as full convalescence.

The ICDSM further submitted that President Milosevic's fundamental
right represent himself, and to not have counsel imposed on him
creates an obligation on the Chamber to accommodate the exercise of
this right by providing conditions other than those of a grueling
trial schedule with restricted access to his legal assistants in a
prison . We provided the Chamber with a legal basis upon which to
order Slobodan Milosevic's release for the continuation of the trial
in a non-custodial setting, following full convalescence.

Chamber III has today denied provisional release, and appears, since
they affirm that they will proceed according to their "timetable", to
have denied requests for an adjournment so that President Milosevic
may obtain specialized medical evaluation and treatment. They did not
mention the ICDSM's motion or requests.

Trial Chamber III has disregarded the reasoning of their colleagues
in the Talic matter who stated:

"It would be inappropriate for this Trial Chamber to wait until
Talic is on the verge of death before considering favorably his
application for provisional release"

The ICDSM considers that it would also be "inappropriate" for the
Chamber to wait until these trial conditions cause severe cardiac
complications, stroke, or death before "considering favorably" an
application for provisional release. It is also "inappropriate" to
wait until Slobodan Milosevic is on the verge of death
before "favorably considering" a request for specialized medical
attention.

The Chamber stated that "as previously" they would deny provisional
release. Previously, that is March 6th 2002, Slobodan Milosevic's
health conditions had not deteriorated as they have in the past
months. Previously, the arguments of the court-appointed amici took
up only four transcript pages including the following remark:

"So I'm not insisting on provisional release and equality of arms, so
to speak".

The ICDSM did not consider that the matter had been previously argued
in an adequate manner. It appears from the fragment of the decision
to which the public was made privy that the Chamber has equated
previous requests with current ones. Such an interpretation would
constitute a gross misapprehension of the facts and the law.

The Chamber did however refuse to impose counsel on President
Milosevic. The ICDSM is relieved that Slobodan Milosevic's arguments
supporting his right to represent himself and not to have counsel
imposed on him have prevailed.

Another statement will follow the disclosure of the full decision.

Tiphaine Dickson
Attorney ICDSM

=== 2 ===

NATO AND NATOITES ATTACK FREEDOM

- actual briefs from The Hague -

December 18, 2002

1) Canadian lawyer Tiphaine Dickson, presently at The Hague, on
behalf of ICDSM, have not been allowed this morning to enter the
court room audience. Policeman at the entrance explained that she had
to make arrangements in advance. In principle the "trial" is open and
anyone, presenting ID, can enter the audience. They can eventually
deny entrance only if all seats are occupied. This morning there was
no queue at the entrance. After her telephone appeal and telephone
appeal from SLOBODA, ICTY stuff promised that she will be let in. We
expect new information.

2) Up to this moment, despite many appeals and request of President
Milosevic, ICDSM delegation have not yet got the "tribunal"'s
approval to meet the President.

3) While we write this, "tribunal" is still dealing with one of
their "witnesses" - former Mayor of Dubrovnik. Not yet
with "administrative" issues. They don't care about the human life,
or more precisely, they used to destroy human lives. They also don't
care about people of Serbia and Yugoslavia, about Yugoslav and
Russian Parliaments, about parties, organizations, medical doctors,
university professors, lawyers and many other from all over the world
appealing. They think they are above the law. But they are not.

4) One of the biggest insults to the law and to even common sense is
parallely taking place at The Hague these days. Brutal murderer
Madeleine Albright, holocaust-profiteer Eli Vizel and couple of other
criminal actors appeared in a necrophilic show around Biljana
Plavsic's "admission of guilt". With absolutely no trace of law, this
show exposed the essence of ICTY in a way that everyone who still has
any illusions about the NATO puppet "court" should not only abandon
illusions, but should join the struggle against this modern
inquisition and civilizational outrage.

5) In denying the permission for the visit, "tribunal" mentioned
ICDSM web site and doubts that delegation may address the press. So,
as we all know, fear from the truth is their principal fear.

6) One can illustrate their panic and attempt to shake the
determination and unity of the people and ICDSM with the outrageous
anonymous e-mail spaming campaign on the eve of the visit, containing
attack on two leading ICDSM personalities, Jared Israel and Nico
Varkevisser. Accusing them of being US/Israeli agents using as
argument a pamphlet from a Saudi Arabian newspaper clearly shows the
background of the attack and the kitchen. It is unnecessary to
present counter arguments to any progressive person on these two
brilliant leftist writers, analysts and activists. Who made more
exposure and wrote more based-on-facts articles on Nazi-type
antiserbian propaganda than Jared Israel? Who is for years focus of
defense of Cuba and Yugoslavia in The Netherlands but Nico
Varkevisser, decorated with a medal of honor by Fidel Castro in
person? Who never had doubts that struggle of President Milosevic is
crucial for the defense of all peoples? But it is also clear in whose
interest is to launch false attacks on these men. In the interest of
the New Nazis and their Gestapo at the Hague.

7) Remember the following: 'The sanctions against [people of]
Yugoslavia will go on "because the crisis (...) with respect to
Slobodan Miloševic, his close associates and supporters
(...)" /George W. Bush, Presidential Notice, May 27, 2002/'

8) ACT IN FULL POWER TO PROTECT THE LIFE OF SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC, THE
MAN WHO DEFENDS OUR FREEDOM, OUR RIGHTS AND OUR HOPES!



Vladimir Krsljanin

International Secretary, SPS

International Coordinator, Sloboda

Yugoslav Coordinator, ICDSM

=== 3 ===

German physicians, some of them members of Nobel Peace Prize winning
organization IPPNW addressed the Hague Tribunal with a demand that
President Milosevic should be immediatelly set free to get medical
cure in Yugoslavia and than to defend himself as a free man. After
unbelievable long time for a human life at stake urgency, they
received an unblievable respond from ICTY President Claude Jorda.
Here is their reply:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

Initiative of Physicians and Therapists Practizing in Germany


Matthias Jochheim, Dr. med. Uta Mader, Prof. Dr. med. habil. Ilse
Eisen-Hagemann, Dr. phil. Hans-Peter Brenner, Prof. Dr. med. habil.
Ingeborg Rapoport, Prof. Dr. med. Dr. phil. Dr. hc. mult. Samuel
Mitja Rapoport, Dr. med. Christa Anders, Dr. med. Ernst Bellmer, Dr.
med. Iris Jonkanski, Dr. med. Wolfgang Hühn



To Mr. Claude Jorda

and to the attention of

Mr. Richard May, Mr. Steven Kay, Mr. Branislav Tapuskovic

ICTY The Hague



December 13, 2002



Live and health of Slobodan Milosevic need consequent measures
immediately


Dear Mr. Jorda,

Thank you for your letter of November 27, 2002, received by
facsimile on November 29, 2002, by which you responded to our letter
of November 8, 2002.

Despite your claim that according to the Tribunal Rules you are not
responsible for the above mentioned subject, it is undisputable that
a serious damage to the health of Slobodan Milosevic or even his
death under the auspices of the Tribunal would be unavoidably seen as
responsibility of the institution, for which you in your function
carry the biggest and in the last instance decision making
responsibility.

In your November 27, 2002 letter of response, you try to diminish our
concern about life and health of Slobodan Milosevic with the remark,
that he receives good and highly qualified medical treatment by the
medical staff of the prison. This argument is not convincing from our
perspective for the following reasons:

The „medical staff“, which is responsible for all prisoners, co=
nsist
of only one doctor and one nurse.

The doctor is not a specialist for Mr. Milosevic's illness.

The good and highly qualified treatment consist of just one weekly
visit by the doctor. Neither an intensive, special examination nor
the necessary therapy are taking place.



Therefore, our conclusions from November 8, 2002 letter, that Mr.
Milosevic is getting no permanent medical control and observation and
no necessary treatment, remain.

Our expressed concerns were increased by a report of NRC Handelsblad
and the news agency Reuters of November 23, 2002 as well as press
reports by Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Stuttgarter Zeitung of
November 25, 2002. They state that Slobodan Milosevic receives for a
longer period of time not just inefficient, but contraindicated
medication, namely blood pressure increasing medication.

How such situation could be in accordance with the alleged high
quality of medical treatment, we do not want to comment. But we
emphasize that this would be an unbelievable scandal which would pass
over any level of tolerance for all those who in their practice have
duty to feel obliged to the Hippocrates Oath.

Upon the order of the responsible Trial Chamber on November 15, 2002
a first examination by a Dutch specialist took place. He stated in
his report, that with appropriate medication the risk of death can be
reduced by 11%. We ask for your understanding that we strongly deny
calculations like that as basis of further procedure.



We strongly condemn the attempt of the Prosecution to use the
threatened health situation of Slobodan Milosevic as a pretext and
occasion to deny him his right to defend himself in person.

The attempt to force upon an „assigned counsel“ is not only vio=
lating
the law, it also contains the danger of producing counterproductive
effects on Mr. Milosevic's state of health: The enforcement of an
assigned counsel against the stated will of the defendant would not
lead to improvement and easement of the situation, but would increase
the stress and the mental burden and by that would also increase the
risk. That proposal of the Prosecution is counterproductive from the
medical point of view, and contraindicated.

The whole situation leads us to reinforce our demands, that Slobodan
Milosevic has to be released immediately from the heath- and life-
threatening situation and set free in order to get the long time
needed therapy by his own specialists in Belgrade. After that, he -
with appropriate guaranties - should be able to defend himself from
freedom against the charges raised.

We support explicitly the proposals filed in that sense by the Amici
Curiae.



Dear Mr. Jorda,

We ask you to take these urgently required measures and to secure by
that effectiveness of the United Nations regulations concerning the
treatment of prisoners.



On instruction of the Initiative,



Dr. med. Uta Mader
(Köln), physician

International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) -
German Section;

Union of Democratic Physicians (Verein der demokratischen Ärztinnen
und Ärzte)

=== 4 ===

Mr. Claude Jorda,
President
ICTY
The Hague
The Netherlands


Esteemed Mr. Jorda,

We have received with great dissatisfaction and embitterment your
reply to
our October 13 letter. With regret we note your apparent
unwillingness to
see the seriousness of the problem we have drawn your attention to.
That way
you may become accomplice in the crime being committed against
President
Milosevic under the auspices of the tribunal you preside. We hope we
shouldn't remind you that as President, you are the most responsible
for the
legality of the ICTY works.

The basic principle of the criminal law endorses that an ill man can
not be
put on trial. President Milosevic is having a serious heart condition
and
his state of health is being ruined on a daily basis by the way the
process
is being conducted, with hundreds of thousands pages of documents and
more
than a thousand of tapes submitted by the prosecution, with no
condition to
prepare for facing hundreds of irrelevant or false witnesses sent by
the
prosecution. With the lack of basic living conditions, such as the
possibility to breathe fresh air, to have regular meals and regular
and
sufficient sleep, it becomes completely clear which factors cause the
deterioration of the President Milosevic's health.

Regarding your reference to the Trial Chamber III March 6 decision on
provisional release, implying perhaps that the issue can not be
discussed
again, we are obliged to underline again that President Milosevic's
state of
health seriously deteriorated exactly since that time. For the reason
of his
illness the proceedings had to be suspended several times. These are
the
facts that must be taken into consideration.

We are also obliged to point the untruthfulness of your claim that
President
Slobodan Milosevic receives "close medical attention of a high
quality". As
a matter of fact, the truth is quite the opposite - he receives
practically
no medical care, especially not of the high quality, unless you
consider
appropriate for a person with serious heart condition to be seen only
once
in a week, and not by a cardiologist, but by an ordinary doctor, who
only
checks his blood pressure. In that sense we recall once again the
First
Principle of Medical Ethics from the UN General Assembly Resolution
No.
37/194 of December 18, 1982, which says: "Health personnel,
particularly
physicians, charged with the medical care of prisoners and detainees,
have a
duty to provide them with protection of their physical and mental
health and
treatment of disease of the same quality and standard as is afforded
to
those who are not imprisoned or detained." The same is stipulated by
the
Article 6 of the Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials (UN
General
Assembly Resolution 34/169 of December 17, 1979) provisions of which
established the obligations for you as President of ICTY. Besides, the
provisions of the World Medical Association Declaration on the Rights
of the
Patient (Lisbon, 1981; Bali, 1995) guarantee the right of every person
without discrimination to "choose freely and change his/her physician
and
hospital or health service institution" (Principle 2). The will of
President
Slobodan Milosevic is to be treated by Yugoslav doctors and
institutions, so
you are obliged to enable with that by deciding that he has to be
cured in
Yugoslavia.

We request once again your immediate decision that President Slobodan
Milosevic has to be cured in Yugoslavia. Any other decision will bear
direct
responsibility for imperiling his life.

If there wouldn't be appropriate decision of your side in the
following
days, we will be, with regret, forced to make further moves, but this
time
towards the international and French bodies in charge of human rights
protection and lawyers' ethics. This will be followed by activating
all
legal means to stop the crime and protect rights of President
Milosevic.

Belgrade, December 12, 2002

On behalf of the Freedom Association

Bogoljub Bjelica, President

=== * ===

To join or help this struggle, visit:
http://www.sps.org.yu/ (official SPS website)
http://www.belgrade-forum.org/ (forum for the world of equals)
http://www.icdsm.org/ (the international committee to defend Slobodan
Milosevic)
icdsm temporary address:
http://emperor.vwh.net/icdsm/index.htm
for your donations:
http://emperor.vwh.net/icdsm/donations.htm

ARTEL GEOPOLITIKA by www.artel.co.yu
office@...
Datum: 17 decembar 2002

---

OUN KRITIKUJE DELOVANJE KOSOVSKIH ALBANACA
Moskva, 17. decembra RIA “Novosti”
specijalno za Artel-Geopolitiku
Valentin KUNJIN, politicki komentator RIA “Novosti”

Politicki lideri kosovskih albanaca sa sve vecom upornoscu izjavljuju
da je neophodno dati nezavisnost Kosovu – pokrajini koja je sastavni
deo Jugoslavije i koja se od juna 1999. godine nalazi pod
protektoratom OUN.
Povod za nove takve izjave bio je dolazak na Kosovo delegacije Saveta
bezbednosti OUN. Putovanje je bilo organizovano na inicijativu
Rusije, sa ciljem da se na licu mesta sagleda situacija u pokrajini,
da se delegacija Saveta upozna sa rezultatima rada misije OUN i
pripremi odgovarajuci izvestaj. Vec prilikom prvog susreta sa
clanovima delegacije OUN albanski lideri su se zalozili za sto
skorije resenje pitanja o statusu Kosova i davanju nezavisnosti ovoj
pokrajini. Kosovski predsednik Ibrahim Rugova izjavio je na
pregovorima da je Kosovo vec nezavisno i da je neophodno samo
formalno potvrditi tu cinjenicu. “Svet treba da postuje demokratske
reforme u pokrajini, - podvukao je Rugova, - i zelju vecine albanaca
da zive u nezavisnoj drzavi”.
Rugovu je podrzao i predsednik kosovskog parlamenta Nedzat Daci, dok
je sef vlade pokrajine Bajram Redzepi pozvao da se posspesi proces
prenosenja veceg dela ovlascenja “prelaznim kosovskim vlastima”, pa i
u delu koji se odnosi na pitanja medjunarodne saradnje.
Ostre kritike na te izjave uputila je rukovodilac poslanicke grupe
srpske koalicije “Povratak” u paralemntu Kosova Rada Trajkovic, koja
je podvukla da sve izjave lidera kosvskih albanaca o neophodnosti
pospesivanja pregovora o definitivnom statusu pokrajine nisu
zasnovane na realnoj situaciji i da predstavljaju “pustu zelju
albanskih politicara”.
Sa time se prakticno u potpunosti slozio sef delegacije Saveta
bezbednosti OUN Ole Peter Kolbi, cija je izjava za politicke lidere
kosovara zaista predstavljala “hladni tuss”. Visokopostavljeni
cinovnik OUN otvoreno je kazao, da je Kosovo trenutno daleko od toga
da tamo “funkcionisu demokratski instituti i drustvo u cijem zivotu
bi mogle realno ucestvovati manjine”. On je naglasio da odluka o
konacnom statusu Kosova ne moze biti doneta nikakvim jednostranim
koracima. Takvu odluku moze da donese jedino Savet bezbednosti OUN,
posle konsultacija sa svim zainteresovanim stranama.
U ovom trenutku paznja Saveta bezbednosti OUN koncentrisana je na tri
osnovna pravca. Prvi, na postizanje na Kosovu citavog niza
opsteprihvacenih medjunarodnih standarda, drugi, na formiranju
multinacionalnog drustva i treci, na punovrednoj integraciji
necionalnih manjina.
Medjutim, realna situacija na Kosovu omogucava da se nedvosmisleno
govori o tome, da kosovski albanci ne nameravaju da resavaju te
probleme i da deluju, zapravo, u suprotnom smeru. Za tri poslednje
godine, spasavajuci se od terora bojovnika takozvane OVK, iz
pokrajine je izgnano preko dvesta hiljada predstavnika nacionalnih
manjina – Srba, cigana, Makedonaca. Poruseno je i spaljeno ne samo na
hiljade kuca koje su pripadale nealbancima, nego je dignuto u vazduh
na desetine pravoslavnih hramova i manastira.
Nekoliko desetina hiljada Srba, koji nisu zeleli da napuste rodna
ognjista, danas zivi u enklavama, okruzenim neprijateljski
raspolozenim albanskim stanovnistvom, pod zastitom vojnika iz sastava
medjunarodnih mirovnih snaga. Pa i pored toga, slucajevi napada
kosovara na Srbe ne prestaju. “Kosovo za albance” – takva je danas
najpolularnija parola, koju otvoreno promovisu svi albanski lideri u
pokrajini – od “umerenog nacionaliste” Ibrahima Rugove, do bivsih
komandira OVK, koji su postali respektabilni politicari cim su se iz
oklopnih vozila premestili u “mercedese”.
Razume se, sve je to bilo dobro poznato cinovnicima iz delegacije
Saveta bezbednosti OUN i pre njihovog dolaska na Kosovo. Jednostavno,
oni su sada sve to videli svojim ocima. Otuda i ostra izjava Ole
Pitera Kolbija.
Istovremeno, ne smemo zanemariti ni prilicno dvostruki prilaz
delegacije OUN oceni situacije na Kosovu. Na primer, poziv gospodina
Kolbija albancima, kao i vecini stanovnistva, “da preuzmu na sebe
odgovornost za bezbednost” nacionalnih manjina izgleda, najblaze
receno, naivno.
I jos nesto. Iz izjava sefa delegacije OUN moze se izvesti zakljucak,
da pod odredjenim uslovima – razvoj demokratskih instituta na Kosovu,
postovanje prava nacionalnih manjina itd., ne treba iskljuciti
mogucnost da se toj pokrajini da nezavisnost. Medjutim, u rezoluciji
1244 Saveta bezbednosti OUN apsolutno jasno se govori o ocuvanju
teritorijalne celovitosti Jugoslavije, i Kosovo se fiksira kao njen
neodvojivi deo. S tim u vezi namece se prirodno pitanje – ne dopusta
li Zapad, koji kontrolise situaciju na Balkanu, mogucnost
preispitivanja odrednica te rezolucije?