Informazione
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csvk6YD_tfQ
(CinecittaLuce, 15 giu 2012) Descrizione sequenze: un ponte, la cittadina ; colonna di soldati italiani entra in città , una bandiera viene sbandierata ; la popolazione locale assiste all'entrata dei soldati ; reparti meccanizzati attraversano la città ; la bandiera italiana svnetola sulla città ; veduta di Lubiana dall'alto ; soldati con artiglieria al seguito in strade di campagna ; vigili spengono incendi ; soldati controllano mezzi cingolati fermi, la popolazione locale guarda i soldati ; sfilata dei soldati a Lubiana, ; i soldati a cavallo nella città ; i volti della gente ; soldato di guardia al palazzo del comando ; fascisti ed autorità all'ingresso del palazzo ; il castello di Lubiana, in alto sventola la bandiera italiana. Archivio Storico Luce http://www.archivioluce.com .
Rechts, zwo, drei (ARTE)
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZT4a9oYeXk
International Injustice: the Conviction of Radovan Karadzic
Last Thursday, news reports were largely devoted to the March 22 Brussels terror bombings and the US primary campaigns. And so little attention was paid to the verdict of the International Criminal Tribunal for (former) Yugoslavia (ICTY) finding Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic guilty of every crime it could come up with, including “genocide”. It was a “ho-hum” bit of news. Karadzic had already been convicted by the media of every possible crime, and nobody ever imagined that he would be declared innocent by the single-issue court set up in The Hague essentially to judge the Serb side in the 1990s civil wars that tore apart the once independent country of Yugoslavia.
Although it bears the UN stamp of approval, thanks to the influence of the Western powers, ICTY is essentially a NATO tribunal, with proceedings in English according to a jurisprudence invented as it goes along. Its international judges are vetted by Washington officials. The presiding judge in the Karadzic case was a South Korean, O-Gon Kwon, selected surely less for his grasp of ethnic subtleties in the Balkans than for the fact that he holds a degree from Harvard Law School. Of the other two judges on the panel, one was British and the other was a retired judge from Trinidad and Tobago.
As is the habit with the ICTY, the non-jury trial dragged on for years – seven and a half years to be precise. Horror stories heavily laced with hearsay, denials, more or less far fetched interpretations end up “drowning the fish” as the saying goes. A proper trial would narrow the charges to facts which can clearly be proved or not proved, but these sprawling proceedings defy any notion of relevance. Nobody who has not devoted a lifetime to following these proceedings can tell what real evidence supports the final judgment. The media stayed away from the marathon, and only showed up to report the inevitable “guilty” verdict condemning the bad guy. The verdict reads a bit like, “they said, he said, and we believe them not him.”
There was a civil war in Bosnia-Herzegovina from April 1992 to December 1995. Wars are terrible things, civil wars especially. Let us agree with David Swanson that “War is a crime”. But this was a civil war, with three armed parties to the conflict, plus outside interference. The “crime” was not one-sided.
Muslim False Flags
The most amazing passage in the rambling verdict by Judge O-Gon Kwan consists of these throw-away lines:
“With respect to the Accused’s argument that the Bosnian Muslim side targeted its own civilians, the Chamber accepts that the Bosnian Muslim side was intent on provoking the international community to act on its behalf and, as a result, at times, engaged in targeting UN personnel in the city or opening fire on territory under its control in order to lay blame on the Bosnian Serbs.”
This is quite extraordinary. The ICTY judges are actually acknowledging that the Bosnian Muslim side engaged in “false flag” operations, not only targeting UN personnel but actually “opening fire on territory under its control”. Except that that should read, “opening fire on civilians under its control”. UN peace keeping officers have insisted for years that the notorious Sarajevo “marketplace massacres”, which were blamed on the Serbs and used to gain condemnation of the Serbs in the United Nations, were actually carried out by the Muslim side in order to gain international support.
This is extremely treacherous behavior. The Muslim side was, as stated, “intent on provoking the international community to act on its behalf”, and it succeeded! The ICTY is living proof of that success: a tribunal set up to punish Serbs. But there has been no move to expose and put on trial Muslim leaders responsible for their false flag operations.
The Judge quickly brushed this off: “However, the evidence indicates that the occasions on which this happened pale in significance when compared to the evidence relating to [Bosnian Serb] fire on the city” (Sarajevo).
How can such deceitful attacks “pale in significance” when they cast doubt precisely on the extent of Bosnian Serb “fire on the city”?
The “Joint Criminal Enterprise” Label
ICTY’s main judicial trick is to have imported from US criminal justice the concept of a “Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)”, used originally as a means to indict gangsters. The trick is to identify the side we are against as a JCE, which makes it possible to accuse anyone on that side of being a member of the JCE. The JCE institutionalizes guilt by association. Note that in Yugoslavia, there was never any law against Joint Criminal Enterprises, and so the application is purely retroactive.
Bosnia-Herzegovina was a state (called “republic”) within Yugoslavia based on joint rule by three official peoples: Muslims, Serbs and Croats. Any major decision was supposed to have the consent of all three. After Slovenia and Croatia broke away from Yugoslavia, the Muslims and Croats of Bosnia voted to secede from Yugoslavia, but this was opposed by Bosnian Serbs who claimed it was unconstitutional. The European Union devised a compromise that would allow each of the three people self-rule in its own territory. However, the Muslim leader, Alija Izetbegovic, was encouraged by the United States to renege on the compromise deal, in the hope that Muslims, as the largest group, could control the whole territory. War thus broke out in April 1992.
Now, if you asked the Bosnian Serbs what their war aims were, they would answer that they wanted to preserve the independence of Serb territory within Bosnia rather than become a minority in a State ruled by the Muslim majority. Psychiatrist Radovan Karadzic was the elected President of the Bosnian Serb territory, “Republika Srpska”. However, according to ICTY the objective of the Serbian mini-republic was to “permanently remove Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats from Serb-claimed territory … through the crimes charged”, described as the “Overarching Joint Criminal Enterprise”, leading to several subsidiary JCEs. Certainly, such expulsions took place, but they were rather the means to the end of securing the Bosnian Serb State rather than its overarching objective. The problem here is not that such crimes did not take place – they did – but that they were part of an “overarching civil war” with crimes committed by the forces of all three sides.
If anything is a “joint criminal enterprise”, I should think that plotting and carrying out false flag operations should qualify. ICTY does not seem interested in that. The Muslims are the good guys, even though some of the Muslim fighters were quite ruthless foreign Islamists, with ties to Osama bin Laden.
One of the subsidiary JCEs attributed to Karadzic was the fact that between late May and mid-June of 1995, Bosnian Serb troops fended off threatened NATO air strikes by taking some 200 UN peacekeepers and military observers hostage. It is hard to see why this temporary defensive move, which caused no physical harm, is more of a “Joint Criminal Enterprise” than the fact of having “targeted UN personnel”, as the Muslim side did.
The final JCE in the Karadzic verdict was of course the July 1995 massacre of prisoners by Bosnian forces after capturing the town of Srebrenica. That is basis of conviction for “genocide”. The Karadzic conviction rests essentially on two other ICTY trials: the currently ongoing ICTY trial of Bosnian Serb military commander General Ratko Mladic, who led the capture of Srebrenica, and the twelve-year-old judgment in the trial of Bosnian Serb General Radislav Krstic.
The Karadzic verdict pretty much summarizes the case against General Mladic, leaving little doubt where that trial is heading. Karadzic was a political, not a military leader, who persistently claims that he neither ordered nor approved the massacres and indeed knew nothing about them. Many well informed Western and Muslim witnesses testify to the fact that the Serb takeover was the unexpected result of finding the town undefended. This makes the claim that this was a well planned crime highly doubtful. The conclusion that Karadzic was aware of what was happening is inferred from telephone calls. In the final stages of the war, it seems unlikely that the Bosnian Serb political leader would compromise his cause by calling on his troops to massacre prisoners. One can only speculate as to what “a jury of peers” would have concluded. ICTY’s constant bias (it refused to investigate NATO bombing of civilian targets in Serbia in 1999, and acquitted notorious anti-Serb Bosnian and Kosovo Albanian killers) drastically reduces its credibility.
What exactly happened around Srebrenica in 1995 remains disputed. But the major remaining controversy does not concern the numbers of victims or who is responsible. The major remaining controversy is whether or not Srebrenica truly qualifies as “genocide”. That claim owes its legal basis solely to the 2004 ICTY judgment in the Krstic case, subsequently echoed (but never investigated) by the International Court of Justice.
“Procreative Implications”
That judgment was very strange. The conclusion of “genocide” depended solely on the “expert” opinion of a sociologist. It was echoed again in the Karadzic case. ICTY reiterated its earlier judgment that the “killings demonstrate a clear intent to kill every able-bodied Bosnian Muslim male from Srebrenica. Noting that killing every able-bodied male of a group results in severe procreative implications that may lead to the group’s extinction, the Chamber finds that the only reasonable inference is that members of the Bosnian Serb Forces orchestrating this operation intended to destroy the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica as such.”
In other words, even though women and children were spared, Srebrenica was a unique genocide, due to the “severe procreative implications” of a lack of men. The ICTY concluded that “the members of the Srebrenica JCE… intended to kill all the able-bodied Bosnian Muslim males, which intent in the circumstances is tantamount to the intent to destroy the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica.” Thus genocide in one small town.
This judgment is widely accepted without being critically examined. Since wars have traditionally involved deliberately killing men on the enemy side, with this definition, “genocide” comes close to being synonymous with war.
In fact, not all Srebrenica men were massacred; some have lived to be witnesses blaming the Bosnian Muslim leadership for luring the Serbs into a moral trap. Moreover, there were many Muslim soldiers temporarily stationed in Srebrenica who were not natives of the town, and thus their tragic fate had nothing to do with destroying the future of the town.
Never mind. ICTY did its job. Karadzic, aged 70, was sentenced to 40 years in prison. As if to make a point, the verdict was announced on the 17th anniversary of the start of NATO bombing of what was left of Yugoslavia, in order to detach Kosovo from Serbia. Just a reminder that it’s not enough for the Serbs to lose the war, they must be criminalized as well.
The verdict is political and its effects are political. First of all, it helps dim the prospects of future peace and reconciliation in the Balkans. Serbs readily admit that war crimes were committed when Bosnian Serb forces killed prisoners in Srebrenica. If Muslims had to face the fact that crimes were also committed by men fighting on their side, this could be a basis for the two peoples to deplore the past and seek a better future together. As it is, the Muslims are encouraged to see themselves as pure victims, while the Serbs feel resentment at the constant double standards. Muslim groups constantly stress that no verdict can possibly assuage their suffering – an attitude that actually feeds international anti-Western sentiment among Muslims, even though the immediate result is to maintain the Yugoslav successor states as mutually hostile satellites of NATO.
The other political result is to remind the world that if you get into a fight with the United States and NATO, you will not only lose, but will be treated as a common criminal. The US-led NATO war machine is always innocent, its adversaries are always guilty. The Roman Empire led the leaders it defeated into slavery. The United States Empire puts them in jail.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQNsW7le8hg
Documentario sugli effetti dei bombardamenti della NATO a Pancevo (Serbia), primavera 1999
La versione italiana del film è stata curata dal Prof. A.Tarozzi insieme al Laboratorio di Sociologia Visuale dell'Università di Bologna
... Пре почетка рада Скупштине, генерал Стојан Батинић је говорио о НАТО агресији на СРЈ 1999. године...
http://www.subnor.org.rs/vojvodina-121
Борци Неготина и Крајине и представници Клуба генерала и адмирала Србије и нишке секције овог клуба пригодним комеморативним скупом обележили су седамнаесту годишњицу од НАТО агресије на Србију и СРЈ...
У месту Подгорцу, крај Бољевца, натовски ракеташи су сасули паљбу на пољопривредну фарму. Том приликом, 6. јуна 1999. погинула су три недужна радника...
Општински одбор СУБНОР-а у Аранђеловцу обележио је пригодним манифестацијама трагичан напад западне војне алијансе на нашу земљу. Одржана је и трибина којој су присуствовали родитељи и рођаци бораца погинулих у ратовима деведесетих година...
Председник СУБНОР-а Бор Жарко Петровић прочитао је испред споменика жтвама НАТО-пакта у Бору проглас „Да се не заборави – Агресори из заседе“ у коме је нагласио да се наша земља, иако мала и сиромашна, исцрпљена економским санкцијама и вишегодишњим ратним окружењем, успешно борила и изборила против нападача чији ни један њихов војник није смео да крочи на територију Србије...
Крагујевац са удружењима, Војска Србије, СУБНОР и чланови породица погинулих у натовском наподу пре 17 година окупили су се крај споменика „Успење“ и одржали својеврсни час историје, оданости, љубави и пркоса према свима који желе да угрозе нашу слободу и независност...
Дан сећања на жртве НАТО агресије обележен је у Зајечару полагањем венаца и цвећа на Споменик борцима настрадалима у ратним сукобима на тлу бивше Југославије 1990-1999...
Ricordiamolo a tutti i fanatici attuali della guerra ed in particolare a quell’interventismo democratico ed europeista che oggi di nuova suona la sua grancassa, dal solito Blair al direttore de La Repubblica Calabresi. Questi esportatori di democrazia hanno responsabilità tremende su ciò che accade oggi in Europa e in tutti gli scenari di guerra che hanno provocato ed alimentato. L’ipocrisia degli interventisti europeisti è insopportabile come le odiosità razziste da cui a parole prendono le distanze, per poi rivendicare l’alto valore morale dei bombardamenti.
La guerra alla Jugoslavia, i bombardamenti di Belgrado sono stati un puro e feroce atto di terrorismo e nessuno che abbia partecipato, sostenuto – o ancora sia oggi sostenga che siano necessarie – simili imprese, nessuno dei guerrafondai democratici ha per me titolo morale per dare lezioni su Bruxelles. A forza di esportare democrazia qui il bene è diventato rarissimo, mentre importiamo il terrorismo che abbiamo scatenato nel mondo.
Basta guerre.
25 marzo 2016
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XkBGeKhafs
среда, 23 март 2016
У Београду је 23. марта 2016. године, одржана трибина посвећена сећању на жртве агресије НАТО против Србије (СРЈ) започете пре 17 година. Организатори трибине били су: Београдски форум за свет равнопрваних, Клуб генерала и адмирала Србије, СУБНОР Србије и Друштво српских домаћина.. Трибини су присуствовали представници студената, српског расејања, Владимир Чушев, амбасадор Белорусије, дипломатски представници Руске Федерације, Народне Републике Кине, Републике Анголе, Швајцарске и других пријатељских земаља.
Минутом ћутања учесници трибине одали су пошту 1008 погинулим браниоцима - војницима и полицајцима и окјо 2500 убијених цивила, међу којима је и 80 деце од неколико месеци до пунолетства.
Учесницима Трибине обратили су се Максим Миско, председник Фонда за мир Белорусије и Захарије Захаријев, председник Фондације „Славјани“ из Бугарске. Под слоганом „ДА СЕ НЕ ЗАБОРАВИ“ о последицама НАТО агресије и глобализацији интервенционозма говорили су: Живадин Јовановић, председник Београдског форума, др Радован Радиновић, генерал у пензији, др Станислав Стојановић, дипломата, генерал у пензији др Лука Кастратовић и историчар проф.др. Александар Растовић.
Запажене су оцене учесника да је агресија НАТО пре 17 година била тачка преокрета у глобалним односима ка неограниченом војном интервенционизму САД и НАТО, одлучујући корак у спровођењу стратегије ширења НАТО на Исток, ка руским границама, милитаризацију Европе и међународних односа уопште, руинирање система УН и правног поретка успостављеног на резултатима Другог светског рата и произвођења хаоса зарад лакшег остваривања егоистичних економских и геополитичких интереса. Констатовано је да време доминације униполарног поретка завршено, да су светски односи ушли у период тектонских промена и да се велики сукоби могу избећи само прихватањем Русије и Кине као равноправних партнера и незаобилазних фактора у решавању иоле озбиљнијих међународних проблема. Указано је да се међународни тероризам убрзано прелива са Средњег и Блиског Истока и Северне Африке на тло Европе и да ће се такав тренд наставити обухватајући и друге земље и континенте. Да би се то зауставило, неопходно је да Запад, а пре свега САД, напусте политику двоструких стандарда, поделу на терористичких организација на «ослободилачке» и «терористичке», на «умерене» и «екстремистичке». Ако 90-тих година није било политичке воље да се поштују одлуке Савета безбедности о прекидању финансирања, обучавања и наоружавања терористичке ОВК на Косову и Метохији, ако није схватано упозорење да Запад (НАТО) својом подршком сецесионизму на делу државне територије Србије припрема одскочну даску за тероризам и организовани криминал као централној и Западној Европи, крајње је време да схвати да је био заслепљени егоистичним интересима, нереалним геополитичким циљевима, русофобијом и србофобијом. Упозорено је да ће се преливање тероризма ка Западу убрзати уколико се хитно не пресеку канали финансирања, обуке наоружавања ИСИС-а што, превасходно зависи од политичке воље најмоћније силе Запада. Предложено је да се ихтно сазове Светска копнференција о тероризму под окриљем УН која би дала зелено светло за припрему Међународне конвенције о борби против тероризма. Учесници трибине су најоштрије осудили терористичке нападе у Белгији и претходно у Француској изражавајући саоучешће породицама невино страдалих људи.
Око 200 присутних представника нестраначких, неависних удружења прихватили су иницијативу да се Влади Републике Србије предложи да сваког 24. марта државне заставе на званичним институцијама буду спуштене на пола копља у знак сећања и поштовања људских жртава агресије НАТО.
The participants were greeted by special guests, Mr. Maksim Misko, President of the Peace Fund of Belarus, and Prof. Dr. Zahari Zahariev, President of the Foundation “Slavyani” of Bulgaria.
Under the slogan “Never to Forget”, presentations on the consequences of NATO aggression and the globalization of interventionism were given by Mr. Živadin Jovanović, President of the Belgrade Forum, General Dr. Radovan Radinović, retired, Dr. Stanislav Stojanović, diplomat, General Dr. Luka Kastratović, retired, and Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Rastović, historian.
The key points made by the speakers underlined that NATO aggression of 17 years ago was the turning point in the global relations as the shift towards an unrestricted military interventionism by the USA and NATO, a decisive step in the implementation of NATO’s strategy of spreading eastward towards the borders of Russia, involving the militarization of both Europe and the international affairs in general, the undermining of the United Nations system and the legal order established on the grounds of the outcome of the WWII, and that its purpose was to create a chaos for the sake of facilitating the self-serving economic and geopolitical interests. It was concluded that the period of domination of unipolar order was over, that the global relations have entered a period of tectonic changes, and that a great conflict could only be avoided by recognizing Russia and China as partners on an equal footing, and also as inevitable factors in resolving any serious international problems.
It was noted that the international terrorism has been rapidly surging from the Middle East, Central Asia and Northern Africa to flood the European soil and that, in all likelihood, this trend was going to spread on to other countries and continents. The halting of this trend requires the West and, notably, the USA, to forego their double-standards policy and their ranking of terrorist organizations as ‘freedom-fighting’ vs. ‘terrorist’, or as ‘moderate’ vs. ‘extremist’ ones.
If the 1990s were marked by the lack of political will to uphold the Security Council’s decisions on discontinuing further funding, training, and arming of terrorist KLA in Kosovo and Metohija, and if nobody cared to understand that the West (NATO) support to secessionism of a part of Serbia’s state territory would amount to a foothold for the upsurge of terrorism and organized crime targeting Central and Western Europe, now it is high time that the West understand it was deluded by the egotist interests, unrealistic geopolitical goals, Russophobia and Serbophobia.
A warning was voiced that the spillover of terrorism onto the West would be gaining pace unless the channels of funding, training and arming the ISIS forces are severed, promptly, although this depends primarily on the political agenda of the mightiest Western power. A proposal was made to call for an urgent convening of a world conference on terrorism under the auspices of the United Nations, which would give the green light for the drafting of an international convention on combating terrorism.
The participants of the Panel have unanimously condemned in strongest terms the terrorist attacks in Belgium and the preceding ones in France, expressing condolences to the families of the innocent victims of these attacks.
At the end, about 200 participating representatives of independent, non-partisan associations endorsed the initiative to submit the motion to the Government of the Republic of Serbia to mark every future 24th March by lowering the national flags on all official institutions at half-mast, in a gesture of remembrance and tribute for the victims of NATO aggression.
Минутом ћутања је у Београду почео Округли сто у организацији многољудног традиционално слободарског и атнифашистичог савеза СУБНОР-а Србије са колективним члановима, основним носиоцем успешног и веома добро посећеног скупа, Београдским форумом за свет равноправних и Клубом генерала и адмирала Србије.
У раду Округлог стола учествовали и угледни представници из Русије, Кине, Белорусије, Бугарске, Анголе, Швајцарске, затим дипломате акредитоване у нашој земљи, истакнути универзитетски професори, јавни и културни радници.
Отварајући скуп, негдашњи шеф дипломатије Живадин Јовановић је подсетио да је у агресији погинуло преко 1.000 особа разног узраста, а многи су позније оболели од последица проузрокованим злочиначким бомбардовањем. Више се и не помиње материјална штета која је, по проценама из 1999. године, премашивала 100 милијарди долара.
Агресија на СРЈ, првенствено на Србију, почетак је интервенционизма на глобалном плану. Као копија оног што је приређено на нашем тлу понављано је у Авганистану, Ираку, Либији, па онда Јемену и Малију, са превратом у Украјини и тако редом до Сирије и свега што се спрема, подстакнуто и избегличком кризом као последицом суманутог војевања, у сваком кутку планете где нису вољни да се покоравају диктату.
Редом са интервенцијама тобож у заштиту људских права и у интересу наводне демократије, шири се појас америчких војних база. После изградње огромног војног стецишта Бондстил крај Урошевца, на српском Косову и Метохији, војници НАТО су се распиштољили са најсавременијим наоружањем у Бугарској, Румунији, Пољској, низу балтичких држава и присуством на дохват руских граница претварају читаву Европу у опасан полигон какав у таквим размерама није постојао ни у доба најжешћег ”хладног рата” ондашњег СССР и САД.
На скупу су говорили и др Станислав Стојановић, др Радован Радиновић, др Лука Кастратовић и др Александар Растовић о стратегијским и историјским последицама агресије НАТО 1999.године. Учесници Округлог стола су затражили да се покрене међународни поступак против лидера ондашњих предводника напада без дозволе ОУН на самосталну и слободну државу и правди приведу почионици злочина на крају 20. века.
Властима Србије биће упућен захтев да се сваког 24. марта на свим јавним местима истакну државне заставе на пола копља у знак пијетета према страдању невиних људи и као протест што су натовски агресори разрушили готово целокупну инфраструктуру наше земље.
Објављено под Актуелно | 24. марта 2016.
Овим речима је председник Владе Александар Вучић, говорећи на страдалничком мосту код Варварина, у срцу Србије, оценио срамни потез удружених натовских снага с почетка 1999. године кад је, на крају дведесетог века, једна суверена држава мучки бомбардована на основу исполитизованих измишљених побуда у намери да се један слободарски народ пороби.
На комеморативној свечаности, у присуству поносних људи, били су и председник Републике Српске Милорад Додик, председница Скупштине Србије Маја Гојковић,министри у Влади Србије, представници Војске Србије, дипломатског кора, разних организација и удружења.
У Београду, на Дедињу, почаст погинулим гардистима одао је Председник Републике Томислав Николић.
На многим местима широм државе такође су одржане комеморације са поруком да се злочини као они према Србији никад и нигде не понове. У београдском парку Ташмајдан, на споменик деци убијеној у натовској агресији, цвеће су, поред осталих, положили у име СУБНОР-а Србије потпредседник Бранислав Поповић и члан Председништва Душанка Лукић Хавелка.
У церемонијалу у Парку пријатељства, на ушћу Саве у Дунав, на обелиск који је до досовске власти носио поносно име Буктиња слободе, венац СУБНОР-а Србије положили су заменик председника Видосав Ковачевић и члан Председништва Мирољуб Васић. Такође и представници разних организација, међу њима и Београдског форума за свет равноправних и Клуба генерала и адмирала Србије, као и више дипломатских мисија акредитованих у нашој држави.
24.03.2016
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) on Tuesday found the former President of the Republika Srpska guilty for his role in the 1995 genocide. Loud & Clear guests Christopher Black and Richard Becker explore the history - and the money - behind the verdict.
On Thursday, Karadžić was found guilty on 10 of the 11 charges brought against him, including crimes against humanity, genocide, and breaching the laws of war, for his role in the 1992-1995 Bosnian War.
Kangaroo court convicts Karadzic
‘Selective, settling scores’: Russia, Serbia lash out at UN war tribunal’s Karadzic verdict
Published time: 26 Mar, 2016