Informazione
All'indirizzo
http://nuke.disarmiamoli.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=lnwW3PmzZIk%3d&tabid=53&mid=413
si può scaricare il volantino nazionale di Disarmiamoli! che propone, in sintonia con il Patto permanente contro la guerra, di scendere in piazza il prossimo 20 febbraio contro il voto alla Camera con il quale si riconfermeranno le spese per il mantenimento delle truppe italiane all'estero.
La Rete nazionale Disarmiamoli!
www.disarmiamoli.org 3381028120 3384014989
---
The European Union acts like a colonial power in the Balkans
Following is an interview by Yugoslavia scholar Cathrin Schütz with Branko Kitanovic, general secretary of the New Communist Party of Yugoslavia (NKPJ), and published in the German daily newspaper Junge Welt on Feb. 12. The Belgrade-based NKPJ was established in 1990 and has its departments in all former republics of Yugoslavia. Schütz and Kitanovic discuss mainly Yugoslavia and European imperialism, but U.S. imperialism played a similar role as its European allies, and of course led the military assault on Yugoslavia. —WW editors
Cathrin Schütz: The West’s favorite candidate, Serbia’s President Boris Tadic, has just been confirmed in office. What position did the New Communist Party of Yugoslavia (NKPJ) take during the election campaign?
Branko Kitanovic: We supported Tadic’s opponent Tomislav Nikolic from the Serbian Radical Party (SRS), who lost by a small margin. He represents an anti-imperialist position, which refuses to accept either the separation of Kosovo or the membership of Serbia in NATO and the European Union, even though his position towards the EU is ambivalent. We are a Marxist-Leninist party and categorically against NATO, not only because it bombed our country in 1999, but because it is an aggressive alliance that supports the policy of the leading western states by military means. We are against Serbia’s entry into EU. The European Union is a creature of big western capital, especially German, English and French. The EU acts like a colonial power towards Eastern Europe and the Balkans. An EU membership would be a harder imprisonment than the ones we suffered under Ottoman or Austrian rule.
CS: So you support the SRS because of its foreign policy?
BK: Right. It is a bourgeois, patriotic party and we do have different ideas on how to achieve the national liberation of our country. The SRS stands for “honest capitalism,” for “fair privatization.” That’s nonsense. Any privatization of public property is theft. Nevertheless, the SRS, which is presently the strongest patriotic party in Serbia, struggles against the government, which carries out the interests of the West. Of course, we as communists are patriots, too.
CS: The term “patriotism” is upsetting to progressive movements in Germany.
BK: Patriotism is a characteristic of anti-imperialism. As Germany itself is an imperialist country, you probably understand the term “patriotism” as meaning support of imperialism. For us, it has a defensive character. We fight for our sovereignty and national integrity, and as a party, for the reestablishment of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. The FRY had deficiencies, for example, Serbia did not enjoy the same rights as the other republics. However: even the worst socialism is better than the best capitalism.
CS: During the 1999 war, the majority of the western left did not oppose their governments’ anti-Serbian agitation and shared the position that then-President Slobodan Milosevic was responsible for the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia. What was your relationship to the Milosevic government?
BK: Since its establishment in 1990, the NKPJ supported the Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS), whose chairperson was Milosevic. The international circumstances at the beginning of the 1990s forced Milosevic to adapt to some sort of social democratic line and to carry out some limited privatizations. I think that he thought that this was the way Serbia could exist in peace. It turned out to be an error. The West, Germany and the UK in particular, wanted to destroy first Yugoslavia and than Serbia. In the end, Milosevic was harmed by not having followed a stricter ideological line. He was surrounded by the wrong people, many of whom turned out to be traitors. We did not support the bourgeois orientation of his party, but we completely stood behind the anti-imperialist features of his foreign policy.
During the years when Milosevic was president, we were able to participate in all elections. Since the pro-western “democrats” had come to power by the coup in October 2000, they made unconstitutionally high demands for the registration for the elections that we still have been unable to fulfill even once.
CS: How will you remember Slobodan Milosevic?
BK: In some respect, he cooperated with the West as president of Serbia and Yugoslavia. After he had been extradited and stood before the Yugoslav tribunal in The Hague, he was incredible. What he did not fully understand before—he realized much better then. In The Hague he made sure the truth was heard. He exposed the methods which the western states used to destroy Yugoslavia and the rest of the world. “Slobo” will go down in history as a symbol of the worldwide anti-imperialist struggle.
Translation by Zoran Sergievski
Articles copyright 1995-2007 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
»Die EU geriert sich auf dem Balkan als Kolonialmacht«
Branko Kitanovic ist Generalsekretär der Neuen Kommunistischen Partei Jugoslawiens (NKPJ). Sie wurde 1990 gegründet, hat ihren Sitz in Belgrad und ist in allen Ländern des ehemaligen Jugoslawien vertreten
Soeben wurde der Favorit des Westens, der serbische Präsident Boris Tadic, im Amt bestätigt. Wie hatte sich die Neue Kommunistische Partei Jugoslawiens (NKPJ) im Wahlkampf positioniert?
Wir haben Tadics knapp unterlegenen Gegner Tomislav Nikolic von der Serbischen Radikalen Partei (SRS) unterstützt. Er vertritt eine antiimperialistische Haltung, die sich in der Ablehnung der Abspaltung des Kosovo sowie einer NATO- und EU-Mitgliedschaft ausdrückt, auch wenn seine Position gegenüber der EU nicht eindeutig ist. Wir sind eine marxistisch-leninistische Partei und kategorisch gegen die NATO, nicht nur, weil sie unser Land 1999 bombardiert hat, sondern weil sie ein aggressives Bündnis ist, das die Politik der führenden westlichen Staaten militärisch stützt. Wir sind gegen einen EU-Beitritt Serbiens. Die Europäische Union ist eine Kreatur des westlichen Großkapitals, vor allem Deutschlands, Englands und Frankreichs. Die EU geriert sich gegenüber Osteuropa und auf dem Balkan als Kolonialmacht. Eine Mitgliedschaft käme einem härteren Gefängnis gleich, als wir es unter der osmanischen und österreichischen Herrschaft hatten.
Sie unterstützen die SRS also wegen ihrer außenpolitischen Haltung?
In Deutschland löst der Begriff Patriotismus innerhalb fortschrittlicher Kräfte Befremden aus.
Die westliche Linke hat sich während des Krieges mehrheitlich nicht gegen die Serbenhetze ihrer Regierungen gestellt. Auch für sie galt der damalige Präsident Slobodan Milosevic als Hauptverantwortlicher der Konflikte im ehemaligen Jugoslawien. Wie war Ihr Verhältnis zur Milosevic-Regierung?
Die NKPJ hat Milosevic und die Sozialistische Partei SPS, der er vorstand, seit ihrer Gründung 1990 unterstützt. Milosevic sah sich in Anbetracht der internationalen Umstände Anfang der 1990er Jahre gezwungen, eine Art sozialdemokratischen Weg einzuschlagen und manche Privatisierungen durchzuführen. Er dachte, Serbien könne so in Frieden existieren. Doch so war es nicht. Der Westen, allen voran Deutschland und England, wollte erst Jugoslawien und dann Serbien zerstören. Letztlich hat es Milosevic geschadet, keine klare ideologische Linie zu verfolgen. Er hat sich mit den falschen Leuten umgeben, viele haben sich als Verräter entpuppt. Die bürgerliche Orientierung seiner Partei haben wir nicht mitgetragen, doch was die antiimperialistischen Züge seiner Außenpolitik betraf, standen wir voll hinter ihm.
Wie werden Sie Slobodan Milosevic in Erinnerung behalten?
I protagonisti della crisi internazionale in corso
“La Serbia – ha continuato (l'ambasciatore della Repubblica di Serbia
in Italia, Sanda Raskovic Ivic) – ha appoggiato l'Italia nelle
riforme dell'organizzazione delle Nazioni Unite e del Consiglio e
adesso noi speriamo che l'Italia non appoggi completamente i paesi
che vogliono bypassare l'esecutivo Onu. Se il Kosovo diventasse
indipendente questo significherebbe che le risoluzioni delle Nazioni
Unite sono risoluzioni al servizio delle maggiori potenze...”
(Fonte: "L'indipendenza minaccia la sicurezza dell'Europa", di
Alessandro Chiappetta, su Aprile online del 13 febbraio 2008, 18:35 -
http://www.aprileonline.info/notizia.php?id=6366 )