Subject: Novi tekst na ARTEL GEOPOLITICI- Beogradski
forum- Vladislav Jovanovic: "SRJ i NATO"
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 20:40:16 -0700
From: "Artel"

ARTEL GEOPOLITIKA
by www.artel.co.yu
office@...
Datum:23 maj 2002

Vladislav Jovanovi?: Izlaganje na Beogradskom forumu
na temu "SRJ i Evroatlantske vojne i politi?ke
organizacije

VLADISLAV JOVANOVI?
Bivsi MIP SRJ

"SRJ i NATO"

02. oktobar 2001. godine
(do sada neobjavljen tekst)

Gleda?u da budem kratak i prakti?an, ne ponavljaju?i ovo sto
su uva?eni predstavnici ve? rekli.
Prvo, sadasnji NATO nije isti kao [to je to bio donedavni
NATO . NATO je bio odbrambeni savez, a danas je NATO
ofanzivna, politi?ka i vojna alijansa koja, kao sto je
izri?ito re?eno na sastanku u Vasingtonu, ima da brani
vrednosti i interese zapadnih razvijenijih zemalja svuda u
svetu gde su oni ugro?eni. Prema tome, ne treba da imamo
iluziju da ulaze?i u taj savez dobijamo samo odbrambeni
kisobran. Ulaze?i u njega, istovremeno se pretvaramo u
najamnike koji ?e taj savez, po volji i ?elji Amerike, da
koristi svuda u svetu kako ho?e.
Drugo, Partnerstvo za mir je, izgleda, svrsena ?injenica. Re?
je o jednoj zakulisnoj radnji sadasnjih vlasti, ne samo
protiv nasih nacionalnih interesa nego i protiv volje bira?a.
Tako va?na ?injenica kao pristupanje Partnerstvu za mir mora
da dobije potvrdu volje bira?a. Sve zemlje koje su pristupile
partnerstvu organizovale su referendum. Zvani?na vlast i ne
pominje tu mogu?nost. Nije diskreciono pravo zvani?ne vlasti
da o tome odlu?uje, mora zemlja u celini da iza toga stane.
S druge strane, ta?no je da smo mi u neprijatnom okru?enju,
da nas je NATO svuda okru?io svojom mre?om Partnerstva za
mir. Ili svojim ?lanstvom. Ali je isto tako ta?no da mi nismo
isti kao druge zemlje koje su zakucale na vrata NATO-u da
udju u Partnerstvo za mir. Mi smo velika ?rtva NATO-a i NATO
je nas veliki du?nik. NATO je oteo od nas deo nase istorijske
dr?ave-Pokrajinu Kosovo. Lisio nas je fakti?kog suvereniteta
nad njim i mi imamo obavezu da ga povratimo. NATO ima obavezu
da nadoknadi materijalnu stetu koju je po?inio kroz
bombardovanje Jugoslavije. NATO nas jos ne tretira
ravnopravno. Ne samo zato sto nas je bombardovao i razrusio,
niti sto nam je uzeo fakti?ki suverenitet nad Kosovom, nego i
sto nas stalno ucenjuje kroz otvorenu listu zahteva i
uslovljavanja. I pre nekoliko dana NATO je odgovorio na nasu
ponudu za Partnerstvo za mir svojim uslovima. Jedan od uslova
je da prekinemo svaku podrsku Srbima u Bosni i Hercegovini.
To zna?i da ih prepustimo da ih NATO utera u unitarnu BiH.
Zbog tih okolnosti nikako ne smemo da budemo strana koja
inicira ulazak u Partnerstvo za mir. Ako to iniciramo, mi
automatski gubimo nas glavni adut, moralnu superiornost, koju
imamo kao ?rtva nelegalne agresije i ulazimo u politi?ki
inferiorni polo?aj, drugim re?ima prihvatamo da pod
neravnopravnim uslovima pregovaramo o ulasku u Partnerstvo za
mir. Prema tome, treba sa?ekati da NATO nas pozove,
ravnopravni polo?aj sa drugima u regionu. Vlast je u?inila
strahovitu, metodsku pogresku sto je prihvatila da o
partnerstvu uopste razgovara pod neravnopravnim uslovima, a
naro?ito da prva zakuca na vrata NATO-u.
Makedonija pokazuje da Partnerstvo za mir ne samo da nije
zastita od strane opasnosti, nego predstavlja opasnost od
ptrznji koje dolaze iznutra. NATO je zastitio Makedoniju od
Jugoslavije za vreme agresije. Ali je nije zastitio od
unutrasnjih opasnosti-terorizma i separatizma. ?ak ga je
podsticao vezuju?i ruke Makedoniji da ne uvozi oru?je iz
inostranstva,dok traje sukob sa teroristima.
Posle teroristi?kih napada na SAD sve ?lanice NATO-a su
morale da se svrstaju pod ?lan 5 Ugovora smatraju?i da je
napad na Ameriku istovremeno i napad na njih. One su time
automatski usle u ratno stanje sa jos neidentifikovanim
neprijateljem Amerike, koji ?e verovatno biti Avganistan, a
mo?da i jos neka zemlja. Ako Amerika to bude zahtevala,
mora?e da joj pru?e vojnu pomo?. Ako bismo sutra usli u NATO,
onda bismo morali SAD da sledimo u ratovima sa drugima. Ne
zaboravimo da su opasnosti za NATO sada izvan evropskih
prostora. Avganistan nije u fokusu pa?nje samo zbog terorizma
nego, pre svega zbog ekonomskih razloga. Otkriveno je ogromno
nalaziste nafte i gasova u isto?nom Turkmenistanu i planira
se naftovod i gasovod kroz zapadni Avganistan i ju?ni
Pakistan. Da bi se to ostvarilo, treba Avganistan politi?ki i
vojno kontrolisati bas onako kako je bila i SRJ bombardovana
kada ju je trebalo kontrolisati.
Ako udjemo u NATO, moramo biti svesni da ?emo biti
upotrebljavani prema odluci drugih, i to ne samo u okolini,
ve? ako treba i u Kaspijskom bazenu, a sutra mo?da i protiv
Kine i negde na drugom mestu. Da li je to nas nacionalni
interes? Da li celokupna nasa istorija to objasnjava i
opravdava? Kada smo mi to bili ekspedicioni korpus drugih?
Samo dva puta. Kraqevi? Marko je morao da ratuje za Turke i
Despot Stefan Lazarevi? je morao da ratuje za sultana
Bajazita pod Angorom, jer su bili vazali. Mi, hvala Bogu, jos
nismo vazali, ali se vrlo brzo trudimo da to postanemo i
bojim se da nekim ljudima mnogo vise odgovara ako bismo to
bili, nego ako ne bismo. Mi ne mo?emo da ignorisemo ?injenicu
da je NATO ogromna politi?ka i vojna ?injenica u Evropi u
svetu, a naro?ito u nasem regionu. Ne smemo to da
zanemarujemo u teku?oj dugoro?noj politici. Tesko da mo?emo
da ka?emo ne na sve zahteve i pritiske NATO i Amerike. Ali
mo?emo da odgovorimo, da- ali, ?ime pritisak sa nas
premestamo na njih. Mi jesmo za NATO, ali koji NATO? Da li
smo za Evropski NATO ili NATO-vsku Evropu? Mi smo za Evropski
NATO. Za kontinentalni sistem bezbednosti u kome ?e sve
dr?ave Evrope da budu jednako sigurne u svoju bezbednost.
Takav Evropski NATO ne bi predstavljao pretnju drugim
dr?avama i narodima u drugim regionima. Sadasnji NATO to
predstavlja. To mu je ispisano na Vasingtonskoj zastavi. Ne
treba da se zavaravamo. Ako bismo dali takav odgovor lakse
bismo se branili od pritisaka i prigovora da ne?emo NATO. U
tom slu?aju, mogli bismo da ra?unamo na aktivno saveznistvo
Ukrajine, Rusije i drugih koji ?ele da sa NATO-om postignu ,
najbolji mogu?i dogovor, a to je da on garantuje jednaku
bezbednost svima u Evropi. A ne da bude za neke jednak, a za
druge nejednak. Na taj na?in mogli bismo da ostvarimo
manevarski prostor i kupimo vreme potrebno za popravljanje
naseg polo?aja u odnosu na NATO, koji je sada vrlo
nepovoljan. Nije ta?no da biti ?lan EU zna?i biti ?lan
NATO-a. Ima 4-5 zemalja ?lanica EU koje ne pomisljaju da budu
?lanice NATO-a, ali se bezbedno ose?aju. Irska, Finska,
Svedska, Austrija, Svajcarska su van NATO. Mi nismo kao oni,
jer smo bili bombardovani, jer nam je oduzet deo teritorije,
jer nas i dalje ucenjuju, ali na nasoj strani imamo moralni
faktor. Taj moralni faktor je nasa velika karta sa kojom bi
trebalo da igramo, pri ?emu bismo mogli da ra?unamo na
razumevanje i podrsku drugih. Ako ve? moramo da se na neki
na?in pomirimo sa Amerikom, i o?ekivanju da NATO postane
Evropski, bolje je da to uradimo kroz jedan bilateralni
sporazum, kao sto je Spanija pod Frankom to bila u?inila,
?ime bismo kupili vreme i tu veliku silu na neki na?in
primirili, a u medjuvremenu da se zajedno sa Rusijom borimo
za Evropski NATO.

Jürgen Elsässer:

"MENZOGNE DI GUERRA
Le bugie della NATO e le loro vittime nel conflitto per
il Kosovo"

Traduzione di Mara Oneta
Prefazione di Andrea Catone
Collana "Frontiere del presente"
Ed. La Citta' del Sole, Napoli 2002
ISBN 88-8292-183-2; prezzo 11 euro


Si tratta della versione italiana del libro edito in Germania
con il titolo "Kriegsverbrechen" dalle edizioni KONKRET
(Amburgo 2000), oggi giunto alla quarta edizione.
Si raccomanda la diffusione piu' ampia possibile di
questo testo, che contiene documentazione altrimenti
introvabile nel panorama editoriale italiano (e non solo).


* l'Indice
* la Quarta di copertina
* come ordinare il libro


*** INDICE:

Prefazione (di A. Catone)

L'Oceania fa la guerra (Introduzione)

I. "La rampa di Srebrenica"
La preparazione propagandistica della guerra NATO contro
la Jugoslavia inizio' nel 1995

II. I combattenti per la liberta'
Il terrore dell'UCK prima della guerra e la disinformazione
dell'opinione pubblica occidentale

III. Racak: il silenzio della signora Ranta
I verbali delle autopsie smentiscono la versione NATO di
un massacro serbo

IV. Manovrato
Che cosa accadde a Rambouillet?

V. Wag the dog
Come la NATO escogito' una campagna serba di espulsioni,
l'"Operazione a ferro' di cavallo"

VI. Sesso, bugie e videotape
Le armi miracolose della NATO nella battaglia contro la
propaganda di Milosevic

VII. Dove sono finiti i Killing Fields?
Propaganda bellica tramite comunicati di centinaia di
migliaia di albanesi massacrati

VIII. Fosse comuni dimenticate
Gli "effetti collaterali" della guerra di bombardamento e
il cinismo dei responsabili

IX. Depleted Credibility
La discussione occidentale sulle munizioni all'uranio e'
ipocrita e mira a rendere ancora piu' efficace la propria
condotta bellica

X. Il fascismo albanese
La favola di un futuro multietnico in Kosovo,
protettorato NATO

XI. Epilogo. Droghe ed oleodotti
Con la guerra dei separatisti albanesi contro la Macedonia
si vuole erigere la Grande Albania e controllare le vie
dell'eroina e del petrolio

Appendice I:
"La libanizzazione del paese"

Appendice II:
Montagne di cadaveri per sentito dire. Un'analisi dello
studio OSCE "As seen, as told" sulle violazioni dei diritti
umani in Kosovo


*** Dalla quarta di copertina:

Febbraio 2002: il "New York Times" rivela che il Pentagono
ha elaborato <<un piano di disinformazione rivolto a Paesi
amici e nemici>>, l'"Office of Strategic Influence".
"1984" di George Orwell è ormai superato dalla realtà!
Ma l'<<Ufficio bugie>> lavora già da tempo senza
bisogno di investiture ufficiali e con ottimi risultati,
soprattutto riguardo la Jugoslavia. Non era mai successo
finora che così pochi mentissero a così tanti e così a fondo
come in rapporto alla guerra per il Kosovo!
L'invenzione di una nuova Auschwitz, di un nuovo Genocidio
in piena Europa alle soglie del XXI secolo è stata la trovata
geniale dell'agenzia americana "Ruder&Finn", ingaggiata sin dal
1993 per far coincidere nell'opinione pubblica serbi e nazisti
e giustificare così l'aggressione della NATO, la sua "guerra
celeste", modello Hiroshima: 600 missioni aeree al giorno,
e fu l'uranio e le bombe sulle industrie chimiche di Pancevo,
furono i missili sulla "Zastava di Kragujevac", fu
la distruzione dei ponti e delle centrali elettriche,
degli acquedotti e delle reti fognarie, delle scuole, degli
ospedali, degli ospizi, degli asili, delle stazioni. E nel
Kosovo, occupato dalla NATO e dall'UCK, si è avuta la "pulizia
etnica" di circa 300.000 tra serbi, rom, appartenenti ad altre
etnie non albanesi ed anche albanesi antisecessionisti su cui
è calato "the Sound of Silence", un silenzio mortale di governi
occidentali e mass media.
Questo libro di Jürgen Elsässer, redattore del mensile
tedesco KONKRET, è un utilissimo strumento nella battaglia
di controinformazione, grazie alla ricca - e in buona parte
inedita - documentazione, grazie al meticoloso e dettagliato
smontaggio delle notizie, passate al vaglio dell'analisi
critica e del raffronto tra versioni diverse: un lavoro
filologico accurato e puntiglioso, di passione e ragione,
volto non a costruire una propria verità di comodo, ma a
documentare quanto effettivamente accaduto.
Si illuminano cosi' di luce affatto nuova alcuni episodi-chiave
di cuisi servì la campagna massmediatica per demonizzare e
"nazificare" il governo jugoslavo: Srebrenica (1995), Racak
(1999), la situazione in Kosovo nell'autunno 1998, l'"Operazione a
ferro di cavallo", inventata dal ministro degli esteri tedesco
Scharping.
Passo dopo passo, Elsässer ripercorre i passaggi essenziali
della vicenda e delle rispettive bugie di guerra: il massiccio
sostegno del governo tedesco all'UCK; l'imbroglio delle trattative
di Rambouillet, con il suo allegato B, che avrebbe consegnato
l'intera RFJ alla NATO; le pressioni della Germania - in
"cooperazione antagonistica" con Washington - per un immediato
intervento militare contro la Jugoslavia; la trasformazione del
Kosovo in un protettorato in cui spadroneggiano le bande dell'UCK
e narcotrafficanti, in effettiva continuita' storica con
il fascismo pan-albanese, collaborazionista delle truppe
di occupazione italiane e tedesche, che semino' analogo terrore
durante la II Guerra Mondiale.

(In copertina: Hieronymus Bosch, "Trittico delle
tentazioni". Particolare delle "Tentazioni di Sant'Antonio".
Lisbona, Museu Nacional de Arte Antiga)


*** Per ordinare il libro:

Edizioni "La Citta' del Sole"
Via Giovanni Ninni 34, 80135 Napoli
Tel. 081-4206374, fax 081-7041804

1. Recensione del libro di M. Nava "Imputato Milosevic" (S. Romano)
2. Milosevic=Hitler, ma sara vero ??? (lettera pervenutaci)


===1===


da "Il Corriere della Sera", 28 maggio 2002,
sezione Cultura, pag. 35

CRIMINI DI GUERRA

In un saggio Massimo Nava denuncia che il processo all'ex
presidente serbo rischia di oscurare le colpe di altri
personaggi

Milosevic, il «cattivo» dei Balcani pagherà per tutti


Come un sovrano prima dell'esilio, nei suoi ultimi giorni
alla Casa Bianca il presidente uscente svuota i cassetti,
si congeda dai collaboratori e concede la grazia a qualche
detenuto eccellente. Bill Clinton fece di più: firmò il
trattato che aveva istituito a Roma nel 1998 il tribunale
penale internazionale per i crimini di guerra. Fu un gesto
simbolico e provocatorio. Non aveva firmato l'accordo al
momento della sua conclusione e sapeva perfettamente che il
Congresso non lo avrebbe mai ratificato. Forse volle mettere
in imbarazzo il suo successore, forse volle aggiungere una
pennellata al proprio autoritratto e trasmettere ai posteri
un segno della politica che avrebbe fatto se fosse stato
libero di agire. George W. Bush, dal canto suo, lasciò passare
sedici mesi e revocò la firma. Esiste così, nel campo del
nuovo diritto umanitario internazionale, una singolare
contraddizione. L'America ha approvato i tribunali regionali
per i crimini di guerra in Ruanda e nella ex Jugoslavia,
ma non intende sottoscrivere l'accordo per il tribunale
penale internazionale. L'America ha duramente imposto al
governo di Belgrado, con una specie di ricatto finanziario,
l'estradizione di Slobodan Milosevic, ma non accetta
organismi internazionali che potrebbero processare un giorno
cittadini americani.
Questa è soltanto una delle contraddizioni che emergono
dal libro di Massimo Nava ( Imputato Milosevic ) sul processo
che si sta celebrando in Olanda contro l'ex presidente
jugoslavo. Ve ne sono altre, non meno interessanti. Per
ammissione degli stessi americani Milosevic ebbe un ruolo
decisivo nei negoziati con cui terminarono a Dayton, alla
fine del 1995, la guerra di Croazia e quella di Bosnia. Se
ebbe responsabilità in quelle vicende, le sue colpe furono
quindi largamente «amnistiate» dai riconoscimenti che gli
vennero tributati in quella occasione. È giusto
processarlo ora per i fatti croati di quegli anni?
Nel periodo che precedette l'intervento della Nato in Kosovo,
l'Uck (esercito di liberazione kosovaro) fu considerato
dagli americani una organizzazione terroristica. È giusto,
soprattutto dopo gli avvenimenti dell'11 settembre,
processare Milosevic per avere combattuto il terrorismo a
casa sua?
In questi ultimi mesi l'America ha ripetutamente approvato
le misure militari disposte dal premier israeliano Ariel
Sharon per demolire le «infrastrutture del terrorismo» nei
territori occupati. E' giusto processare Milosevic per
avere fatto, sia pure con maggiore durezza, la stessa
politica? Per avere la collaborazione della Russia nella
guerra afghana, l'America ha smesso da qualche mese di
criticare le dure repressioni dell'esercito russo in
Cecenia. È giusto processare Milosevic e associare Putin
ai lavori della Nato?
Ma Nava non si limita a segnalare queste contraddizioni.
Ha assistito, come inviato del Corriere, alle vicende
balcaniche degli anni Novanta, conosce l'imbroglio jugoslavo,
ricorda quanti governi e uomini politici abbiano contribuito
a creare le condizioni del dramma che si è consumato nella
penisola fra il 1991 e il 1999. Sa, ad esempio, che il
riconoscimento tedesco delle prime due repubbliche
secessioniste (Slovenia e Croazia) fu imprudente e
intempestivo. Sa che il premier bosniaco Alija Izetbegovic
faceva, sin dall'inizio degli anni Novanta, una aggressiva
politica islamica. Sa che gli americani favorirono il
rafforzamento dell'esercito croato e aiutarono Franjo
Tudjiman, uno dei maggiori responsabili della grande crisi
balcanica. Il processo dell'Aja (è questa una delle
conclusioni a cui giunge il libro di Nava) ha l'effetto di
oscurare queste vicende. Nel grande dramma jugoslavo
esiste ormai un solo «cattivo»: Slobodan Milosevic.
Non so se questa possa definirsi «giustizia» . So che da
questa vicenda giudiziaria la storia del dramma jugoslavo
rischia di uscire falsata e incomprensibile.


Il libro: Massimo Nava, «Imputato Milosevic. Il processo
ai vinti e l'eticadella guerra», Editore Fazi, pp. 237,
euro 14,00

Sergio Romano


===2===


Milosevic=Hitler, ma sara vero ???

Non c'e' alcun dubbio sui tentativi - peraltro riusciti - di
demonizzare i Serbi comparandoli ai Nazisti: basta "navigare"
in rete per imbattersi in centinaia se non migliaia di "servizi"
che si riferiscono a questo.
La verita' opposta risulta invece piu' convincente:
Proviamo a paragonare Clinton/Blair/Nato ed i loro affiliati
a Hitler ed ai Nazisti.
E sorgono quindi spontanee le domande:

C'e differenza tra la campagna di terrore scatenata dai Nazisti
per annettersi i Sudeti nel 1938 e quella dell' UCK nel Kosovo
nel 1998 ??
Chi si invento' le atrocita' allo scopo di attaccare impunemente
la Polonia nel 1939, e la Yugoslavia nel 1999 con la "guerra
lampo" (Blitzkrieg) usando RACAK come pretesto ???
Chi bombardo' Belgrado nel 1941 e ancora Belgrado nel 1999 ??
Chi ha messo in moto una tale macchina di propaganda dalle
proporzioni "Kafkiane" se non Goebbels nel decennio 1930 e la
Nato nel 1990 ???
Chi impiego' i V1, V2 per terrorizzare dall' alto la popolazione
indifesa in Inghilterra, e chi riverso' dai 5000 metri le bombe
a grappolo, l'uranio impoverito, e lancio' da centinaia di Km
lontano i missili Cruise e Tomahawk sulle popolazioni,sugli ospedali,
sulle fabbriche, sui ponti e su altri obiettivi che non avevano
nessun nesso con le operazioni militari in Kosovo, se non per
portare TERRORE ???
Chi stipulo' il trattato di Monaco nel 1938 (con l'intenzione
di non rispettarlo), e chi impose nel 1999 la Risoluzione del
Consiglio di Sicurezza 1244 (con l'intenzione di non onorarla)??
Chi usurpo' i poteri degli Stati sovrani con la scusa di andare
in soccorso alle popolazioni se non per abusarne successivamente??
E quale era la strategia nel 1930 "Drang nach Osten" (Colpo verso
l'Est), e quella del 1990 per la conquista di territori d'influenza??
Chi teorizzava nel "MEIN KAMPF" la supremazia dei Tedeschi, e quale
e' oggi la dottrina della supremazia USA sul mondo se non quella
del NUOVO ORDINE MONDIALE, a cui tutti i popoli devono sottostare
- pena l'esclusione e l'annichilimento ???

Alla fine della sua lunga lettera di denuncia agli attuali
dirigenti Serbi per lo sfacelo economico, l'impoverimento
del popolo, lo smembramento dello stato sociale, l'asservimento
alle potenze occidentali, Vlajko Stoljikovic (ricercato dal TPI
per genocidio - al tempo dei fatti Ministro dell'interno) spiega
la motivazione del suo gesto estremo davanti al Parlamento yugoslavo:

" L'uomo e' nato per vivere una sola volta,
Il suo onore e la dignita' sono eterni."


Sergio <sergbru@...>

Subject: Novi tekst na ARTEL GEOPOLITIKA- Bane
Popovic: Srpska izvinjotina
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 00:52:30 -0700
From: "Artel" <artel@...>

ARTEL GEOPOLITIKA by www.artel.co.yu
office@...
Datum:29. maj 2002


Bane Popovic: Srpska izvinjotina

Beograd, 27 maj 2002.

Srpska izvinjotina koja je nedavno naru?ena od strane
gospodina D?ozefa Bajdena, predsednika Komiteta za
spoljnu politiku ameri?kog Senata. Umesto Kostunice ili
Djindji?a, u?ini?u to ja (i ja sam nekakav Srbin!).

I tako, Mi, Srbi, sve?ano se izvinjavamo, zato sto smo:
- se branili od razbijanja titovske Jugoslavije od
antikomunisti?kog podriva?kog delovanja CIA i ostalih
zapadnih tajnih slu?bi, a zatim od hrvatskog, slovena?kog,
muslimanskog i siptarskog separatizma.
- na ishitreno priznanje Hrvatske, Slovenije, Makedonije i
BiH od strane SAD i njihovih satelita, ?ime je podr?ana
poglavito oru?ana secesija tih republika, odgovorili
kontinuitetom SR Jugoslavije sa istorijski (jos od kraja
19. veka) priznatim dr?avama Srbijer i Crne Gore.
- bili podvrgnuti dugogodisnjim surovim ekonomskim
sankcijama SAD i njhovih satelita nakon la?ne optu?be
protiv SR Jugoslavije da je izvrsila agresiju na BiH, iako
na dan uvodjenja embarga SR Jugoslavija nije imala vojnike
na toj teritoriji, dok ih je Hrvatska tamo dr?ala vise
desetina hiljada.
- do?iveli da Hrvatska izvrsi, tokom akcija u "Meda?kom
d?epu", zatim "Bljesak" i "Oluja", stravi?ne pokolje
civila i genocidnog progona nekoliko stotina hiljada Srba
iz Hrvatske.
- svetskoj javnosti ukazali da su tajne sluzbe SAD i
njhovih satelita bile glavni organizator insceniranih
granatiranja ulice Vase Miskina i sarajevske pijace
Markale, a za to optu?ile srpsku stranu, pa iskoristile za
uvodjenje sankcija i bombardovanje Srba u BiH.
- bili ?rtve nametanja uslova Dejtonskog sporazuma od
strane SAD, kojim je ostvareno vise nepravdi prema Srbima
- dat Hrvatima ju?ni deo do tada poglavito Srbima
naseljene Bosanske krajine, teritorija RS pocepana na dva
dela stvaranjem "Distrikta Br?ko", data prednost hrvatskom
konceptu resavanja pitanja poluostrva Prevlaka umesto
uva?avanja celovitosti i suvereniteta Bokokotorskog
zaliva, okupiran Kosmet kao neodvojiv deo dr?ave Srbije.
- bili podrgnuti nametanju spoljnog zida sankcija od
strane SAD i njihovih satelita - nedopustanje povratka SRJ
u OUN, MMF, Svetsku banku i druge medjunarodne
organizacije, izolacija izabranog rukovodstva da putuje u
inostranstvo, kao i mesanju u unutrasnje procese u SR
Jugoslaviji - finansiranje kvislinsko-kosmopolitske
opozicije i sebi pod?injenih medija, okretanje crnogorskog
rukovodstva protiv srpskog, upu?ivanje svetskih vode?ih
medija na demonizaciju srpskih vlasti i naroda, kao i
neprestana uslovljavanja Beograda (Haski sud, sukcesija
eks-Jugoslavije, KiM).
- trpeli ameri?ko vodjenje i finansiranje siptarskog
secesionisti?kog pokreta na Kosovu i Metohiji,
insceniranje tzv. masakra u Ra?ku od strane Amerikanca
Vokera, ameri?ki ultimatum Srbiji i SR Jugoslaviji na
la?nim pregovorima u Rambujeu.
- branili od siptarskog terorizma na Kosmetu, oduprli se u
medjunarodnom pravu neutemeljenom i divlja?kom
bombardovanju SR Jugoslavije od strane NATO avijacije,
kojim je fizi?ki unistavana privreda, saobra?ajna i
medijska infrastruktura zemlje, te ista fizi?ki zatrovana
radioaktivnim i toksi?nim materijama.
- do?iveli takvu nepravdu da se u takozvanom Haskom
tribunalu danas sudi jedino najvssim politi?kim i vojnim
liderima nsse nacije (iz Republike Srpske, Srbije i SR
Jugoslavije), koji su se suprotstavili ovakvom delovanju
SAD, njhovih satelita i njihovih jugoslovenskih pomaga?a,
?ime SAD i njihovi sateliti nameravaju da zataskaju
sopstvenu tesku odgovornost za sve zlo?ine koje su
po?inili protiv srpske nacije.
- danas kao nacija pod okupacijom SAD i Zapada, koji su
srpskom narodu nametnuli kvislinsko rukovodstvo koje je
dobilo zadatak da u potpunosti ispuni ameri?ki diktat,
?ime se ?eli definitivno razbiti nezavisna srpska dr?ava i
kona?no realizovati decenijska politika uterivanja Srba u
tor "Novog svetskog poretka" pod kontrolom SAD.

"Izvinjavamo se, mnogo se izvinjavamo..."
Da nam je ?ao sto se sve ovako tragi?no desilo, sto su
stotine hiljada ljudi ostale bez ?ivota, bez imovine, bez
krova nad glavom, bez domovine, bez perspektive, to je
sasvim jasno.
Da smo mi Srbi najve?i gubitnici svih ratova nastalih u
cilju razbijanja SFR Jugoslavije, da smo ?rtve razbijanja
SR Jugoslavije, to bi trebalo svaki posteni posmatra? da
prihvati, jer je to istina koja se jasno vidi, ukoliko je
taj posmatra? iole objektivan.
A da je krivica na strani onih, koji su hteli da budu
nezavisni na stetu nacije koja je u proslosti najvise
doprinela njihovoj nacionalnoj emancipaciji i sazrevanju
kao nacije, takodje bi trebalo da bude jasna istina.
Krivica je i na strani onih spoljnih faktora, koji su
videli sansu za kona?no ostvarivanje svojih dugoro?nih
geopoliti?kih i ekonomskih interesa, pa su jugoslovenski
gradjanski rat potpirivali i direktno u njemu u?estvovali,
sa ?alosnim ciljem da skrse dr?avnu tvorevinu srpske
nacije.
Doduse, tragicna rascepkanost i nesloga medju Srbima
doprineli su ovakvom po Srbe nepovoljnom raspletu.
A sto i medju Srbima ima kukolja, kao u svakom ?itu, tu?na
je istina...

I GRANDI LEADER ALBANESI

Su invito del Mufti di Pristina, Hodja Redzep Boja,
gli albanesi del Kosovo-Metohija si apprestano ad
erigere una grande statua raffigurante Tony Blair,
ritenuto artefice della loro vittoria contro lo Stato
jugoslavo e della prossima formale secessione della
provincia. La statua di Blair sara' alta almeno 25 metri
e sara' collocata a Pristina, dove una strada e' gia'
stata intitolata a Tony Blair, e dove nemmeno il recente
monumento a Skanderbeg e' tanto imponente. La notizia,
dopo essere rimbalzata sui media jugoslavi, e' stata
riportata anche dal Sunday Times di Londra.

Dal giugno 1999, quando le truppe KFOR hanno occupato il
territorio, numerosi monumenti e testimonianze della
Guerra Popolare di Liberazione, come le targhe commemorative
dei partigiani serbi ed albanesi, sono stati distrutti dai
nazionalisti vicini all'UCK sotto gli occhi "vigili" delle
truppe occidentali.

===*===

+++ Albaner errichten ein Denkmal für Tony Blair +++

PRISITINA, 03. Juni 2002. Die ethnischen Albaner in
Kosovo und Metochien wollen ein Denkmal zu Ehren des
britischen Premierminister Tony Blair errichten,
berichtet die Londoner "Sunday Times". Der Initiator
der dieser Aktion ist der extrem eingestellte Hodja
Redzep Boja, der Mufti von Pristina. Die Statue soll 25
Meter hoch sein und damit höher als das vor kurzem
erhobene Denkmal, zu Ehren des albanischen Volkshelden
Skenderbeg aus den Türkenkriegen sein. In Pristina gibt
es bereits eine Straße die nach Tony Blaire benannt
ist.

BEOGRAD.COM / INET.NEWS / AMSELFELD.COM

ARTEL GEOPOLITIKA

by www.artel.co.yu
office@...

Datum:30. maj 2002.

Dr MILAN TEPAVAC: "Problem izbeglica u SR
Jugoslaviji i nestalih lica sa Kosova i Metohije"

Izlaganje na okruglom stolu Beogradskog foruma odr?anog
24.maja 2002. u Etnografskom muzeju u Beogradu.

Ja bih se u svojoj diskusiji ukratko osvrnuo na tva-tri
pitanja koja su ovde danas spomenuta, a koja bih ?eleo
elaborirati jer ih smatram jako va?nim.
Pitanje broja Srba u Hrvatskoj pocetkom 1991. godine, dakle
na pocetku njihovog stradanja, a zatim izgona.
Mislim da moramo biti sasvim precizni kada je o tome rec,
jer je rec o ciframa a ne o misljenju, stavovima. Sa pravom
brojkom se manipulise iz raznoraznih razloga, najcesce
prljavih politickih, ali i iz neznanja. Oni koji barataju s
tim ciframa cesto se ne potrude da pogledaju u zvanicne,
nicim osporene podatke. Zato smatram da kao apsolutno tacne
treba da uzmemo podatke iz popisa stanovnistva u SFRJ, i to
onog iz 1981. godine, dakle ne onog iz 1991. Tada, 1991,
takode je bio, kao sto znamo, popis, ali on je odr?an u vec
poremecenim odnosima i podaci se ni u kom slucaju ne mogu
uzeti za verodostojne. Ne zaboravime da su Srbi jos u
decembru prethodne godine, dakle 1990, izbaceni iz Ustava SR
Hrvatske kao narod i slicno. Bilo bi dakle naivno verovati
da su podaci tadasnjeg popisa pozdani. Dakle, prema popisu
stanovnistva u SFRJ 1981. broj Srba u Hrvatskoj je iznosio
531502. Kao "Jugosloveni" se izjasnilo 379.057 lica. Dobro
je poznato da su se kao "Jugosloveni" uglavnom izjasnjavali
Srbi. Necemo dakle pogresiti ako ove dve cifre jednostavno
zbrojimo. Dobije se broj 910.559. Kada postavimo pitanje
koliko je Srba bilo u Hrvatskoj pocetkom 1991. godine - kada
je pocela njihova tragedija - normalno je pretpostaviti da
je taj broj bio nesto veci od broja iz 1981. godine.
Dakle, dolazimo do brojke od oko jedan milion. Treba takode
podsetiti da se jedan znacajan broj Srba pri popisima
izjasnjavao kao "Ne izjasnjava se" (kao sto sam ja licno
cinio, smatrajuci da u jednoj visenacionalnoj zajednici ne
treba akcentirati nacionalnu pripadnopst). Dakle, ako se
hoce biti objektivan i posten pri svakom raspravljanju o
pitanju Srba u Hrvatskoj treba polaziti od tog broja i
navedenih okolnosti.
Jucerasnji zagrebacki "Jutarnji list" pise o popisu
stanovnistva u Hrvatskoj nedavno obavljenom, i navodi da je,
prema tom popisu, sada u Hrvatskoj oko 180.000, sto je, vele
ove novine, 4,05% stanovnistva Hrvatske. Danasnja beogradska
"Politika" pise da srpske organizacije u Hrvatskoj
kategoricno odbacuju ove navode JL, navodeci da je broj Srba
u Hrvatskoj veci. No, bez obzira na to da li je taj podatak
tacan ili ne, vise je nego jasno da je od 1991. do danas
doslo do izgona gotovo celokupnog srpskog stanovnista iz
Hrvatske, dakle do etnickog ciscenja jednog naroda bez
presedana u periodu od Drugog svetskog rata. I to upravo
naroda nad kojim su nacifasisti u toku Drugog svetskog rata
pocinili genocid u tzv. NDH po opsegu i monstruoznosti bez
presedana u istoriji.
Hrvati umanjuju i dalje ce umanjivati stvarni broj Srba iz
cisto politickih razloga. Prema postojecem zakonodavstvu u
toj novokomponovanoj dr?avi obim mnogih prava "nasionalnih
manjina" ovisi o njihovom broju. Otud ?elja za sto manjim
brojem, pored iracionalne mr?nje prema manjinama u
Hrvatskoj, posebno prema srpskoj. Ja ovom priliko ?elim da
budem kategorican u jednoj stvari: zameram svima onima koji
su olako presli preko izmena izvrsenih u Ustavu SR Hrvatske
u decembru 1990. godine kada je iz Ustava izbrisana odredba
o konstitutivnosti, ravnopravnosti srpskog naroda sa
hrvatskim narodom. To se odnosi i na prethodnu vlast u
Jugoslaviji i na sadasnju, i na svakoga onoga ko je
prihvatio taj antidemokratski i anticivilizacijski potez
tadasnjih hrvatskih vlastodr?aca. Svakome ko ?eli da zna
dobro je poznato da je konstitutivnost srpskog naroda u
Hrvatskoj i njegova ravnopravnost u istoriji stalno
potvrdivana jos od pre Marije Terezije, preko stavova
Hrvatskog sabora u 19. veku do odluka ZAVNOH-a i svih ustava
i Hrvatske i Jugoslavije od 1945. godine do tog kobnog dana
u decembru 1990. godine. To se nikada nije smelo prihvatiti
ni prakticno ni teoretski. Mi danas imamo situaciju da cak
okupatorska vlast u Bosni i Hercegovini - olicena u
gaulajteru Volfgangu Petricu - priznaje konstitutivnost
svatri narodsa u BiH. Pa kako se onda mo?e prihvatiti teza
da je konstitutivnost srpskog naroda u Hrvatskoj - bez
obzira na smanjenu brojnost - nestala voljom novoustaske
vlasti u Hrvatskoj i njihovih inostranih pokrovitelja? Ja
bih zato predlo?io i zamolio da ovo na odgovarajuci nacin
ude u zavrsni dokument, deklaraciju, ovoga skupa.
U naju?oj vezi sa prethodno recenim je naravno pitanje
povratka izbeglih Srba svojim kucama u Hrvatsku. Ja cu
spomenuti samo jedan aspekt ovog pitanja: pitanje vracanja
stanarskog prava izbeglim Srbima. - Kao sto je dobro
poznato, kada je krajem 1990. i pocetkom 1991. doslo do
povampirenja ustastva u Hrvatskoj, mnogu Srbi iz urbanih
sredina Hrvatske - pamteci i noseci u krvi ono sta se Srbima
dogodilo 1941- 45 godine u NDH - pobegli su iz svojih
stanova u Srbiju ili drugde. Racuna se da je takvih oko
50.000. Ako se uzme prosecnost porodica od samo tri clana -
radi se dakle o oko 150.000 lica, 150.000 tragedija, 150.000
beskucnika koji se, evo vec preko deset godina, zlopate, jer
jos uvek im ti njihovi stanovi nisu vraceni i time, naravno,
sprecen i njihov povratak sto je , ocigledno, i osnovni cilj
hrvatskih vlasti. Kao sto je poznato, u Bosni i Hercegovini
ovo je pitanje reseno. Hrvati ponesto obecavaju ali nista ne
cine u praksi. - Organizacija za evropsku bezbednost i
saradnju (OEBS), koja ima svoje diplomatske misije i u
Beogradu i u Zagrebu, zna da se u javnosti hvali da se ona,
bo?e moj, svojski anga?ovala da se ovo pitanje resi kao
osnovno pitanje ljudskih prava i kao civilizacijsko pitanje
Evrope koja pretenduje da bude nosilac najnaprednijih ideja
kako u oblasti ljudskih prava tako i buducnosti Evrope. Ona
do sada nije nista ucinila, sem obecanja da ce uciniti. A to
je itekako njena ne samo moralna nego i pravna i politicka
du?nost! Zasto to veli? Pa, evo zasto: ova nesretna
organizacija je najzaslu?nija sto su jugoslovenske
secesionisticke republike, pre svih upravo Hrvatska, postale
"nezavisne" dr?ave. Protivno svom osnovnom konstitutivnom i
programskom dokumentu, Finalnom aktu KEBS iz Helsinkija od
1. avgusta 1975. godine, ona je, umesto da pomogne da ne
dode do krvavog komadanja svog suosnivaca i svoje clanice
SFR Jugoslavije - sto je bila du?na po spomenuttom njenom
osnovnom dokumentu da ucini - ucinila sve da raskomada
Jugoslaviju i da sto pre prizna secesionisticke entitete za
dr?ave i da ih br?e-bolje ukljuci u svoje clanstvo!! Otuda,
eto, njena obaveza da bar nesto ljudski moralno ucini: da
prisili Hrvatsku da se bar malo ponasa u skladu sa osnovnim
aktima te po Jugoslaviju i po srpski narod kobne
organizacije. (Ne zaboravimo da je ona mogla, da je htela, -
a bila je i du?na da to ucini!! - da spreci agresiju NATO
pakta na Jugoslaviju i zato sto je na Kosmetu imala svoju
Verifikacionu komisiju. Pokazalo se, kasnije, da su clanovi
te komisije ustvari bili spijuni NATO koji su pripremili
teren za agresiju!!). Posto je Jugoslavija clan te i takve
organizacije, trebalo bi, bar, ciniti sve da ona prinudi
Hrvatsku na civilizacijsko ponasanje kao sto rekoh...Takode
molim da i ovo pitanje nade svoje mesto u deklaraciji sa
ovoga skupa.
Treca stvar na koju bih se osvrnuo bila bi istupanje naseg
prijatelja i patnika Sime Spasica koji je upravo govorio o
sudbini kidnapovanih Srba i drugih nealbanaca na Kosmetu. On
cesto nastupa javno, i uvek naravno emotivno govori, jer
nemoguce je o ovoj temi drukcije govoriti. On i njegovi
drugovi iz Udru?enja po pitanju kidnapovanih naprosto
sagorevaju i kopne na tom pitanju, a ne mogu nista da ucine.
Ja ?elim ovom prilikom da budem kategorican: to pitanje -
pitanje sudbine kidnapovanih preko 1300 - mora postati
pitanje broj jedan ove dr?ave, dr?ave Srbije i dr?ave
Jugoslavije! Ne Sime Spasica i njegovih drugova jer oni po
tom najtu?nijem i najsramnijem pitanju nase stvarnosti ne
mogu bez dr?ave nista da postignu. Ni od takozvane
medunarodne zajednice po ovom pitanju ne mo?emo mnogo
ocekivati. Danas, ovde, dosta smo toga culi kako se ona
odnosi prema srpskim izbeglicama i srpskom stradanju u
celini, ukljucujuci i one naj (ne)odgoivornije medu njima
kao sto su UNHCR, Sagato Ogata, Meri Robinson i slicni.

URL for this article:
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/borislav.htm

=======================================
A CONVERSATION WITH AMBASSADOR BORISLAV
MILOSEVIC, SLOBODAN'S BROTHER (Part 1)
[Posted 2 June 2002]
=======================================

Note from Jared Israel: On May 24th I
spoke via three way telephone with
BORISLAV MILOSEVIC, Yugoslav Ambassador to
Russia from 1998-2000 and before
that Ambassador to Algeria.

We discussed the significance of
widespread Russian support for Slobodan
Milosevic; the New World Empire's efforts
to destroy international judicial
standards and political discourse; and the
highly deceptive character of
Sept. 11 and the War on Terror.

Ambassador Milosevic mainly spoke
Serbo-Croatian, which was kindly translated
by Vladimir Krsljanin, International
Secretary of the Socialist Party of
Serbia. A few times Ambassador Milosevic
spoke English, as indicated in the text.

-- JARED ISRAEL

[To make following the conversation
easier, we have preceeded comments with
the name of the speaker.]

* JARED ISRAEL
Mr. Ambassador it's a great honor to speak
with you.
For our readers, let me say that your
brother, Slobodan Milosevic, has just
won the Sholokhov prize, named for Mikhail
Sholokhov, author of the great
Russian novel, 'And Quiet Flows the Don.'
Could you say a bit more about the prize?

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC
Yes. It is perhaps the most distinguished
Russian award, given to artists and
political leaders of outstanding
achievement. Today at the award ceremony I
accepted the prize for Slobodan Milosevic
because, as the writer Yuri
Bondarev said in bestowing this honor,
Slobodan is being held in the dungeon
of The Hague.

* JARED ISRAEL
Dungeon is the word, isn't it? They don't
even let him meet with Chris Black,
the head of his lawyers' committee. And
his living conditions are outrageous
- terrible food, no exercise, no right to
see his own doctors - or any heart
specialist - even though his heart
condition is a matter of record. And
forced to be in court all day and to
cross-examine witnesses virtually every
day, week after week, which is unheard-of.

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC
I think this award will further strengthen
the fighting spirit of Slobodan
Milosevic and his courage as well.

* JARED ISRAEL
Also it suggests that the Russians see
President Milosevic's resistance as
important to their own experience.

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC
Yes. The greater part of Russian society
strongly supports Slobodan and
practically nobody approved his delivery
to The Hague, not even those
Rightist parties who were hostile to his
government. Both houses of the
Russian parliament voted overwhelmingly to
condemn his kidnapping. Even the
mainstream newspapers publish articles
critical of The Hague.
Russian people consider Slobodan Milosevic
a hero of resistance to
imperialist intervention, a patriot who
defends his country and his people.

* JARED ISRAEL
This support from Russia is very
encouraging to me.
I interviewed your brother on March 23rd
2001, just before he was arrested.
During that interview he said that one of
the things US and West European
leaders hated about Yugoslavia was the way
you handled the question of
national and religious group relations.
There had been so much conflict in
the past. Some groups had been organized
by the Nazis and earlier by the
Ottoman Empire to attack Serbs, and Roma
and Jews as well of course - and yet
in Yugoslavia, and this is still true in
Serbia, you had schools in 24
different languages and court proceeding
in nine languages. When I was in
Serbia this past year I saw that there is
still an attitude of mutual
appreciation among different groups.
It seems to me that the strategy of the
New World Empire that has attacked
you is to stir up hatred. They use the
guidelines laid down by the Nazis,
finding points of weakness in ethnic or
religious groups that will allow the
Empire's mass media and operatives to play
on cultural traits that if left
alone wouldn't necessarily be a problem.
They stir up hatred in one culture
against another in a hideous way,
especially appealing to groups that were
once in a dominant position, empowering
their worst elements. The Empire does
this more effectively than the Nazis
because they have much more
sophisticated mass media. Perhaps the
worst thing is that the mass media
romanticizes racist violence by calling it
revenge.
But, contrary to the media lies, (1) your
government never engaged in racism.
You always tried to promote fraternity.
This was clear in Slobodan
Milosevic's speech at Kosovo Field in 1989
(2) and before then too, despite
the extremely provocative situation.
Some people say Russia and Serbia are
linked, that Serbia is little Russia.
And so the fact that the Russian people,
after what they've been through, the
terrible trauma of the 1990s, the fact
that they can see as their beacon this
man who stands for social justice and
tolerance, this gives me hope. Because
there is another possible beacon - ethnic
hatred, anti-Semitism, which has
reared its head in Russia in the past, a
Black Hundreds solution.

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC
You're completely right. There was no kind
of discrimination in Yugoslavia,
and while some former Yugoslav Republics
have become virtual mono-ethnic
states, Serbia hosts a million refugees of
all national and religious groups
and one third our population is not ethnic
Serbs. (3)
Serbia did not abolish the autonomy of
Kosovo in 1989 as some so-called
experts claim. Only certain extreme and
inappropriate elements of statehood
were removed from what was after all a
provincial government. This was done
to prevent the de facto creation of a
separate state in Kosovo.

* JARED ISRAEL
Which is precisely what NATO and the UN
are supporting now - a separate
Kosovo.

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC
Yes.
Kosovo Albanians were not deprived of any
human or cultural rights in 1989.
The same was true of people in [the
Serbian province of] Vojvodina. In fact,
Kosovo Albanians continued to have
cultural rights unequalled in the rest of
Europe.
The accusations of loss of autonomy were
contrived. The secessionists
organized or forced ethnic Albanians to
boycott State institutions and set up
parallel institutions for purely political
reasons. (4)
Everyone knows that schools, universities,
the press, hospitals and TV were
maintained in Kosovo in the Albanian
language, even during this decade-long
boycott. The secessionists organized this
boycott to provide Western media
with provocative images and to create a
no-alternative situation for
Albanians. All political manipulation. (4a)
This is clear from the leaflet which
Slobodan Milosevic showed The Hague
'court' while he was cross-examining
[ethnic Albanian leader] Ibrahim Rugova.
The leaflet, which was signed by the KLA
and Rugova, ordered ethnic Albanians
to leave Kosovo during the bombing. Do you
see the game they played?
This demonstrates their dual purpose:
creating the false appearance that
Serbia was causing ethnic Albanians to
suffer, so that this could be
broadcast to the NATO countries, and
fostering a situation within Kosovo
where compromise was near impossible. This
was behind everything they did,
including the so-called Racak massacre and
the exodus of the ethnic Albanian
population during the NATO aggression.

[ Note: regarding the above, please see,
'The Racak Hoax' at
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/Johnstone/racakhoax.htm
And 'Why Albanians Fled During NATO
Bombing,' at
http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/keys.htm ]

* JARED ISRAEL
And once they got the Albanians to leave,
they put them in refugee camps
under KLA control, with NATO's blessing.
Even the Western media had stories
reporting that these camps featured
non-stop hate-the-Serbs-and-'Gypsies'
indoctrination.

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC
Yet during the three months in this Hague
'court', we have seen one after
another witness testify they never even
heard of the Kosovo Liberation Army.

* JARED ISRAEL
It would embarrass NATO. They claim they
are fighting terrorism, but these
people are all members - or leaders - of a
terrorist group.

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC
Yes. It is a problem.
At the very beginning of the trial it
seemed as if Mr. May, whom they call
'judge,' was trying to create the
impression of impartiality. But now he
openly behaves as an extension of the
prosecutor. He prompts and assists
witnesses, allowing them every liberty
including making political speeches.
But he cuts off Slobodan Milosevic and
does not allow him to conduct
cross-examination fully or to express his
opinion.
This is very alarming. It creates a
precedent for violating accepted legal
principles including the impartiality of
courts, the very basis of law. It
requires the strongest international
protest.
This on top of the fact that Slobodan
Milosevic is a head of state,
overthrown by foreign money and then
kidnapped by foreign agents. Who is next?

* JARED ISRAEL
I think this so-called trial makes the
Reichstag Fire case look good. At
least Dimitrov was allowed to present his
case.

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC
Yes, this Hague 'court' behaves like
someone's instrument. Since its
foundation it has been a tool of
aggression against Yugoslavia.
In some of my statements here in Russia I
often say that the Yugoslav crisis
was created in order to reorganize the
whole of international relations in
accordance with American interests and
expansionism and it was done in a very
conscious way.

* JARED ISRAEL
You know, also it was a step towards the
encirclement of Russia, wasn't it?
Because isn't it true that those who would
attack Russia need to consolidate
their hold in the Balkans first? And if
you look at what has happened, NATO
now surrounds Russia from Central Asia to
the Baltic. They have penetrated a
dozen countries. (5)

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC
The aggression in Yugoslavia was an
attempt to impose new International rules
to justify NATO, a regional military
organization, usurping the sovereign
rights of countries outside its previously
claimed zone of responsibility. So
military and geopolitical expansion is
presented as humanitarian peace
making. Terrorist attacks are launched and
then intervention is threatened if
a country defends itself, and all this is
justified by a whole new
interpretation of international law so
that now even the United Nations is
employed to legitimize geopolitical expansion.
There were in the past many other examples
of violations of the UN charter:
Vietnam, Granada, and so on, and this
includes the sending of Russian troops
to Afghanistan. However, none of these
instances were sanctioned by the
Security Council.
In this sense, the Yugoslav case was
something new, an attempt to create an
international legal framework to justify
the destruction of a country by
terrorist forces. And what took place
after Sept. 11, that is NATO's
expansion into Central Asia, is a
continuation.
So, in the Yugoslavia crisis we saw this
new quality - aggression condoned by
international law and international legal
structures. And after September 11
we see this process moving into a new
stage. This makes it clear that both
the aggression against Yugoslavia and the
expansion of NATO from a West
European organization into Eastern Europe
- these were of more than regional
importance. (5)

* JARED ISRAEL
You know one of the interesting things
about September 11th is that here we
see an Empire which has organized most of
the terrorism in the world, mainly
starting with Afghanistan, but they claim
to be leading a crusade against terrorism.
The whole strategy of the US intervention
in Afghanistan, beginning in 1979,
was to promote terrorism. They and the
Saudis used the Wahhabi form of Islam,
pouring money into the madresses which
became schools training the terrorists
that subsequently plagued Chechnya,
Bosnia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Kashmir and I
think they are in the Middle East as well.
And this same terrorism which they have
created - and there is a lot of
indication that Mr. bin Laden is still
connected with the CIA (6) although
now that NATO is entrenched in Central
Asia they conveniently stopped talking
about him - this same terrorism which they
unleash in order to destabilize
areas is also used as an excuse to
intervene. So it is a tool of many
purposes. Very convenient and very
American, because it's very American to
have a tool that does two things at once.
A gadget. Terrorism is a political
gadget because on the one hand they can
use it to attack multiethnic society
as they did in Bosnia and then on the
other hand they can use it as the
excuse to invade, as they are now doing
with Central Asia.
But what shows their hypocrisy is - and
you may or may not know about this -
the United States is still shipping in
millions of militant Islamic
fundamentalist textbooks (6a) into
Afghanistan. Now why on earth would they
be doing this if they were sincerely
fighting against Islamic fundamentalism?
They just used this terrorist movement
which they themselves had created as
an excuse to move in.
Just one other point that occurred to me
when you were talking is that the
conduct and discourse of your government,
which was the last legitimate
government in Yugoslavia since what's
there now was created by the US,
Germany and Norway - the discourse of your
government respected political
ideas. (7)
This New World Empire attacks the very
possibility of political discourse by
shattering the link between words and what
they define - the Empire bombs
people and calls it humanitarian. They
manufacture events - we saw that with
Racak. And they simply rewrite history
(8), including manufacturing a
fictional version of your brother's famous
1989 speech. (1)
By doing these things they undermine the
possibility of rational discussion
because truth becomes whatever the
powers-that-be and their media portray as
true - it's a function of what's shown on
TV. And at the same time, they
reduce politics to threat and violence and
then they say, "Alas, that's
reality." But your brother takes ideas
seriously.
One of the organizations orchestrating the
*anti-human* actions at The Hague
is called, amazingly, Human Rights Watch.
I was present the first few days of
President Milosevic's 'trial' at The Hague
and I got to observe Richard
Dicker, a top HRW bureaucrat, in
operation. Not only was he virtually the
only person representing the 'Tribunal' to
the press - I mean, he was Carla
del Ponte's spokesman! - but both the
press and 'Tribunal' officials clearly
deferred to him, and he was often closeted
with the prosecutors. I saw this
with my own eyes. I commented to one of
the senior reporters, "It looks like
Dickers is running the show," and the
reporter laughed and said, "Dickers
*is* the show."
We have several articles in preparation
about HRW. Their board of directors
is a Who's Who of the Imperial
establishment, including Warren Zimmermann,
the U.S. Ambassador who helped destroy
Yugoslavia including by sponsoring
Alijah Izetbegovic, the fundamentalist who
devastated Bosnia (9) and George
Soros who boasts that he helped his father
run an extortion racket for the
Nazis in Hungary during World War Two,
visiting Jewish families targeted for
death camps and demanding all their money
in exchange for safe passage. And
now he runs a privatized adjunct to the
CIA. And this is *Human Rights* Watch.
HRW demonizes anybody who stands up to
Imperial-organized terror. When NATO
sent the KLA to attack Macedonia, Human
Rights Watch condemned Macedonian
security troops for resisting.
When I interviewed President Milosevic I
asked why your government accepted
defeat during the coup of 2000 instead of
going to war against your
opponents. He said something like, "We
wanted to avoid being sucked into a
civil war, which would allow NATO to
intervene on the grounds that Serbs are
'hopelessly violent.' Moreover, it is easy
to kill people but it isn't easy
to bring them back."
Despite everything that has been done to
you, you resisted descending into a
nightmare pit. You have upheld political
discourse against this Imperial onslaught.
I read a thing the other day by Noam
Chomsky, whom a lot of people put on a
pedestal. In it Chomsky makes the sweeping
generalization that
counter-terrorism "is terrorism carried
out by the state." But that's a very
simple minded approach. Because, contrary
to what Chomsky says happened in
Yugoslavia, when you fought the terrorists
in Kosovo - who were themselves
sponsored by NATO countries - when you
fought them, the Yugoslav Army took
causalities rather than endangering
civilians. (10)
Now one cannot say that *taking*
causalities rather than hurting civilian
is the same as *not* taking casualties and
hurting the civilians. So all
counter-terror is not terror. There are
choices in the unfortunate situation
of fighting terrorism as in everything.
And of course saying,
"counter-terrorism is state terror" has
the effect of obscuring these choices
and may end up justifying terrorism -
because after all the terrorists are by
definition no worse than the people
fighting them.

*** THIS DISCUSSION IS CONTINUED IN PART 2 ***


www.tenc.net * Emperor's Clothes

http://emperors-clothes.com/news/borislav.htm


PART 2 - CONVERSATION WITH AMBASSADOR
BORISLAV MILOSEVIC, SLOBODAN'S BROTHER


* JARED ISRAEL (CONTINUED)
And this current tendency to reduce human
existence to one equivalent evil,
where 'humanitarian' means 'bombing' and
resistance to terrorism is by
definition virtually the same as terror,
where it is considered natural for
ethnic groups to try to kill each other
and we are supposed to root for
whichever side the Imperial media has
portrayed as victims so that whatever
they do is justified as "revenge" against
whatever group has currently been
labeled "just like Hitler" - that, it
seems to me, is what your brother has
been fighting. That is why I'm supporting
him. Sorry for my long speech!

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC [In English]
Yes yes! No, no it's very good speech!

[In Serbo-Croatian] The whole concept
that your government is trying to
impose on the world is very similar to
what they preached when there was a
bipolar world, creating a positive force
and its opponent, a negative force,
which today is called international
terrorism; and in that struggle
everything is allowed. And nobody may be
neutral in that fight.
So in the conditions of world supremacy
of one power, the tendency for having
new armaments of mass destruction, new
lethal arms is increasing and it leads
to development and strengthening of
terrorism. International terrorism cannot
be suppressed by the use of force alone,
especially, as you correctly pointed
out, when the supreme power is itself
organizing terrorism in various ways in
Kosovo, in Afghanistan, in Chechnya. So
international security can be created
only on the basis of universality, and
not on the basis of isolation and
destruction of several countries that
allegedly represent some axis of evil.
And you have correctly pointed out that
many organizations defined as
terrorist for instance and especially in
the Middle East, were created and
are still controlled by the American
secret services.
And the American policy has created great
harm in other ways. There is the
destruction of the environment and the
economy in Yugoslavia because of the
attack. And there is the increasing
danger of both nuclear accident and
nuclear war.

* JARED ISRAEL
I think you made a very important point,
that the Empire wishes to create the
perception of a bipolar world, in which
they are one pole and the other is
terrorism.
This Empire's thinkers are aware that
every action has an equal and opposite
reaction. Because it's a law of politics,
isn't it? So opposition inevitably
develops. And because they are clever,
instead of only attacking the
opposition, the Empire tries to mold the
opposition. How can they lose if
they are fighting something they control?
Their own nightmare image, in effect.
By declaring this war on terrorism, they
are fighting forces which they
covertly control. Then they also defend
these terrorists, whom they actually
organized, by means of the 'human rights'
apparatus which they also control -
and this ends up luring some people into
sympathy and support for the
terrorists.
Such people may not be thinking clearly
or maybe they've just fallen into the
natural reaction that "the enemy of my
enemy is my friend" - it's a human
trait to think that way. So we see people
on what considers itself the Left
in the West making heroes out of the
Taliban and other terrorists. But these
terrorists are not fundamentally
opponents of this Empire. The Taliban,
for example, are victims of a guiding
principle of this Empire, which is, "We
have no friends, we only have future
victims." This Empire may attack those
whom it supported yesterday, as the need
arises. The Taliban were supported
by them (11) and then abruptly they
became a target because the US needed an
excuse, or more properly, the Empire
needed an excuse, because it is not the
same as the US, this Empire is above the
US government, the Empire needed an
excuse to move into Central Asia. This
was for geopolitical reasons. They
wanted to give Central Asian nations the
DOS (12) treatment, which is
penetration by Fifth Column
organizations, and we see this now going
on in Central Asia accompanied by military
penetration and the corruption of the
remnants of the Soviet officer corps
disguised as military aid and training.
The goal is to build a force in these
countries capable of striking Russia.
The Empire knows that Russia, in alliance
with China, is the primary real
threat to their control.
None of this is contradicted by Mr.
Putin's complete capitulation. As we saw
with Macedonia, capitulation does not
protect a country from attack by this
Empire. Indeed, the experience of the
Taliban shows that even being created
by this Empire won't help if they decide
to recycle you! (13)

So this move to complete the encirclement
of Russia is justified by the "war
against Terrorism." And so some people in
the peace movement, perhaps not
giving enough thought to what's going on,
but simply reacting to the
appearance, which is that the Empire is
attacking Islamic fundamentalist
terrorists - some people conclude that
the fundamentalists are an ally in
resisting NATO. Meanwhile, in fact, huge
numbers of Taliban are being
incorporated into the new Afghan army
(14) which is still a Fundamentalist
army, just more directly under Imperial
control and with an end to local
squabbling, or so they hope.
When Russia was the opposite pole, that
was a problem. Russia had positive
ideas and practices regarding social
equality. It was weak on democracy and
sometimes on international morality but
strong on social equality, and this
encouraged dangerous egalitarianism. But
with Islamic terrorists as the
opposite pole, when potential opponents
are drawn to the opposite pole, what
are they idolizing? The most backward and
fascistic forces - the very people
Saudi Arabia and US used to destroy the
secular state in Afghanistan.
So these jihad terrorists, the most
brutal killers, who condone violence
against women, whose definition of
democracy is enforcing the Quran, who
advocate religious war - these fanatics
become the heroes for kids who want
to change the world. What a nightmare.

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC
It is a difficult situation.
Regarding this, let me say something
about the war on terror. We in
Yugoslavia consider September 11th a
tragic event.
Perhaps your readers are not aware of the
horrific destruction done to my
country [during the NATO attack on
Yugoslavia]. This was a war of terror. It
was launched to support terrorists in
Kosovo. And it was conducted by planes
dropping bombs, often encased in uranium,
from a great height, not by troops
on the ground. Terrible destruction,
massive killings, environmental
devastation. And all carried out from a
great height. Against a country which
hadn't invaded or threatened anyone. So
this too was terror. (15)
But we take no satisfaction regarding
Sept. 11. On the contrary, we
sympathize with those who have suffered
in the US.
It is understandable that people in your
country would have strong reactions
when those terrible events happened last
September. But now time has passed.
A more thoughtful approach may be taken.
A road of peace may be pursued. I
hope that people in your country will
think deeply about these questions. It
is very important to the world.

* JARED ISRAEL
Thank you, Mr. Ambassador.

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC [In English]
OK, Israel. It was very very big pleasure
for me and I am very pleased to
contact to you like this and thank you
very much. Very big pleasure for me.

* JARED ISRAEL
Well, thank your mother and father for
having produced two men who have
contributed so much to the world.

* BORISLAV MILOSEVIC [Laughs. Says in
English]:
Don't overestimate things.

* JARED ISRAEL
But it's the truth. Where would we be
without Serbia? You resisted. What can
I say? The Serbs seem to do it every
time.

***

Join our email list at
http://emperors-clothes.com/f.htm
Receive articles posted on Emperor's
Clothes.

Click here to email the link to this
article to a friend.

Further Reading:

1) 'MEDIA MISREPRESENTATION OF
MILOSEVIC'S WORDS: A REVIEW OF THE
EVIDENCE,'
by Professor Francisco Gil-White can be
read at
http://emperors-clothes.com/milo/gw.htm

2) 'Milosevic Speech at Kosovo Field
(1989),' can be read at
http://emperors-clothes.com/milo/milosaid.html

3) 'BY ADDING THREE LIES, ONE DOES NOT
GET THE TRUTH - ONLY A BIGGER LIE,' is
a statement Slobodan Milosevic made
during a pre-'trial' hearing at The
Hague. It contradicts what one might
expect Milosevic to say, based on his
portrait as drawn in the Western media.
Can be read at
http://www.icdsm.org/milosevic/30jan.htm#1

4) In the classic text, 'Seeing
Yugoslavia Through a Dark Glass: Politics,
Media and the Ideology of Globalization,'
Diana Johnstone quotes a
semi-internal publication of the very
anti-Milosevic International Crisis
Group which states that Albanian
secessionists in fact boycotted
Albanian-language institutions in Serbia
(as opposed to having been deprived
of such cultural institutions by supposed
racists, as they and the Western
media claimed.) In other words, they and
the Western 'experts' lied. The
relevant quote is at
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/Johnstone/1yugo.htm#kspring
Ms. Johnstone's article is generally
instructive in seeing through the dark
glass of misinformation about Yugoslavia.

4a) Speaking of 'provocative images,' in
'Art in the New World Order,'
written in spring of 2000, a news
photographer discusses the amazing fact
that from 1998 to 2000 virtually all the
top photojournalism awards were
given for pictures of crying Kosovo
Albanian women. What will future
generations make of this? Can be read
(and sample prize winning photos can be
seen) at
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/artinthe.htm

5) "Afghan Operation Leaves Russia
'Encircled' by US and NATO,"
by Sergey Ptichkin and Aleksey Chichkin
can be read at
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/encircle.htm

6) 'Gaping Holes in the 'CIA vs. bin
Laden Story,' by * JARED ISRAEL can be read at
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probestop-i.htm

6a) 'Bush & the Media Cover up the Jihad
Schoolbook Scandal,' By * JARED ISRAEL at
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm

7) 'Did any major power NOT fund the
Kostunica campaign?' can be read at
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/everybody's.htm

8) 'The Black Hole,' by Petar Makara
documents that 'Yugoslavia' was removed
from the Britanica when the existence of
said country became politically
incorrect. Can be read at
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/multiple/blackhole.html

9) Alijah Izetbegovic was portrayed in
the Western media as a moderate in
favor of a multiethnic Bosnia. Nothing
could be further from the truth. For a
revealing quote from his book, "Islamic
Declaration," and a bit on his role
during World War II, see "JOE LIEBERMAN -
APOLOGIST FOR THE FASCIST KLA" at
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/garris/duringthe.htm#1

10) 'The Other Side of the Story,' by
Dusan Vilic and Bosko Todorovic.
Written by two retired Yugoslav generals
with access to never-before released
army orders, this truly amazing book
documents the ways the Yugoslav Army
strove to fight NATO-backed terrorists in
a civilian-friendly way, thus
demonstrating that contrary to Chomsky,
counter-terrorism need not equal
terror. The issue of civilian relations
is discussed throughout including in
chapter seven which can be accessed at
http://emperors-clothes.com/book/book7.htm

The book can be accessed in full, or, for
quicker loading,
chapter-by-chapter, starting with chapter
one. For whole book go to
http://www.icdsm.org/more/book.htm
or for chapter one (with link to chapter
two, and so on) go to
http://emperors-clothes.com/book/book1.htm

11) 'Congressman: U.S. Set Up
Anti-Taliban to be Slaughtered,' includes
text of Congressional hearing and comments by
* JARED ISRAEL. Go to
http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/rohr.htm

12) DOS stands for Democratic Opposition
of Serbia, a charming use of
language, since these 'democrats'
overthrew the elected Yugoslav government
and burned the Parliament and these
'Serbs' were given what were in Serbian
terms astronomical amounts of money by
the US and other states in the new
Empire in exchange for 'their' nation.
For more information, see these two
texts, which also have useful references
found in 'sections marked Footnotes'
or 'Further Reading':

* a) "Kostunica Says Some Backers
'Unconsciously work for American Imperial
Goals...'" at
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/erlang.htm
[Includes the infamous remark that the US
shipped 'suitcases of cash' to DOS]

* b) 'US Arrogance and Yugoslav lections' at
http://emperors-clothes.com/engl.htm

13) On NATO's use of UN-paid terrorists
to attack Macedonia see: "SORRY,
VIRGINIA, BUT THEY ARE NATO TROOPS, NOT
'REBELS'" at
http://emperors-clothes.com/mac/times.htm
[Note - If you are not familiar with what
has been done to Macedonia, the
phrase "UN-paid terrorists" may sound
like the worst hyperbole. But read the
article and you will see that it is
understatement.]

14) For documentation of claim that much
of Taliban has been incorporated
into the new Afghan Army, go to
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/oil-1.htm#1

15) In 'Death on a Very Small Planet' we
have posted strikingly similar
pictures of the destruction caused by
September 11th and by NATO's bombing of
Yugoslavia. Can be viewed at
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/1/rem.htm

=======================================
Emperor's Clothes Needs Your Help!
=======================================

Emperor's Clothes has only one source of
income - your donations. We want
everyone to read our articles, whether
they can afford to contribute money or
not. But if you can contribute, please
do; we are only able to continue based
on your help.

To keep Emperor's Clothes publishing
please send whatever contributions you
can! $20, $50, $100, $500, $1000,
whatever you can afford. Every penny will
be used to get articles to more people.
(But whether or not you make a
donation, please continue reading
Emperor's Clothes!)

You can make a donation using Paypal at
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=emperors1000@...&no_shipping=1

You can make a credit card donation by
going to our secure server at
http://emperors-clothes.com/howyour.html#donate

Or Mail a check to Emperor's Clothes,
P.O. Box 610-321, Newton, MA
02461-0321. (USA)

Or make a donation by phone at the
donation line, (U.S.) 617 916-1705.

We can now accept donations through
e-gold. Our account # is 444982.

Note: If you mail a donation or make one
by secure server, please let us know
by email at emperors1000@... to make
sure we receive it. Thanks!

You Can Be an Emperor's Clothes Sponsor!
Help Emperor's Clothes grow! You can
automatically contribute any sum you
wish via credit card once a month. In
this way you will help put Emperor's
Clothes on a more reliable financial
basis. To become a Sponsor, write
emperors1000@... and we'll contact
you Thanks!

Thank you for reading Emperor's Clothes.

www.emperors-clothes.com or
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]

This Website is mirrored at
http://emperor.vwh.net/ and at
http://globalresistance.com

> http://www.ansa.it/balcani/jugoslavia/20020529194632236688.html

INDAGATO DJUKANOVIC: CACCIA AL TESORO DEL PRESIDENTE/ANSA

Opširnije...