Prospects Bleak For Kosovo’s Roma Refugees

Thousands of Kosovo Roma are still living as refugees in neighboring Serbia, Macedonia and Montenegro, where they face the prospect of permanent statelessness, poverty and social exclusion.

Whilst the 1999 war in Kosovo is ancient history for many people, this is not the case for thousands of Kosovo’s displaced Roma. Unable to return to Kosovo, or scared to do so, and mostly refused asylum status in neighbouring Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia, where they have sought refuge, they live in dire poverty and face the risk of permanent statelessness. Estimates put the number of Roma, Askhali and Egyptian refugees from Kosovo in Serbia at 22,000 to 40,000; whilst there are some 3,000 in Montenegro and 1,200 in Macedonia. Life in refugee camps, illegal settlements or in rented accommodation is difficult, jobs and money are scarce, and the help they get from state governments and humanitarian organizations is scant.

Redza Pajazitaj, 41, a former resident of the Kosovo municipality of Istok, has lived in the Konik refugee camp near Podgorica, Montenegro, for 13 years; a camp he shares with some 1,500 of his compatriots. “We manage somehow here. Even if there is no job, if you go to the dumpsters you will find some piece of bread,” he said. “People here do not throw old food in the dumpsters but leave it beside them, because they know that our Roma use this bread to feed their children,” Pajazitaj remarked. Life may be grim in the camps, but many are too scared to return to Kosovo.

During the Kosovo conflict, Roma were seen as allies of the former Serbian regime by Kosovo’s ethnic Albanian majority. After the Serbian authorities withdrew from Kosovo, many Roma fled, and they fear reprisals if they return. “My son was three months old when we fled from Kosovo. Now he is 13. If I took him back to Kosovo, he wouldn’t know where he was, and all my other children were born here,” Pajazitaj explained. He says he is better off in Montenegro, where he takes pride in watching his seven children go to school, thanks to the Red Cross. He provides for his family by unloading trucks when needed – a paid, unsteady job, he says. “But at least there is some work here. In Kosovo there is nothing for me,” he added.

Although the authorities in Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia would like the Roma to return to Kosovo, they are bound by the Geneva Convention on refugees and cannot expel them. In the meantime, they remain without proper papers, regulating their status in the countries where they have taken refuge. They also lack access to education and healthcare services as well as proper accommodation. Redza is one of them. Left to the mercy of local humanitarian organizations and some state help, he is trying to obtain asylum status in Montenegro so that he can continue building a new life there.

Mohammad Arif, from the UN Agency for Refugees, UNHCR, in Macedonia, explains that after 13 years, either the return home of these people – or their integration into the countries where they now live – is complicated.
“Their problems are not easy to solve. Some serious security issues need to be solved first, so these remaining cases are always tough,” he says.

Least Bad In Montenegro

“Konik camp presents apoor image of Montenegro, and representatives of the international institutions are well aware of that,” says Zeljko Sofranac, director of the Montenegrin Bureau for the Care of Refugees.

At a donor conference held in April in Sarajevo, Bosnia, international donors pledged to find €300m for a programme to provide homes for some 74,000 people displaced during the wars in the Balkans. “All their activities, which are conducted with our cooperation, primarily focus on this area.”

Montenegro’s plan is to attract some of that money to its own proposed national housing programme for Roma refugees. The idea is to build more than 1,000 housing units, either by providing prefabricated houses or by providing construction materials to those who have bought land. The total cost of the project is estimated at over €27m, to which Montenegro would contribute approximately €4m.

Sofranac says that the proposed voluntary return of around 500 refugees to Kosovo remains highly problematic, so most of them will probably have to be integrated into Montenegro. “Voluntary return is the best way of solving refugees’ problems. But the only cooperation we receive in Kosovo on this is with local authorities,” he says. “Kosovo’s government, probably with the support of some powerful higher echelons, doesn’t want to fulfill its international obligations in this regard.

Musa Demiri, from Kosovo’s Labour Ministry, says his country is ready to help returnees. “When it engages in the accession process with the EU, it will have to meet those obligations, but that’s not satisfactory for us because we have to act now.” But Demiri admits that with a very high unemployment rate in Kosovo, they cannot guarantee that returnees will find any work or a sustainable livelihood there. “All Kosovo citizens have to be treated equally, and as a ministry we have no special programmes for refugees and returnees,” Demiri says.

Segregated In Serbia

While some Roma refugees in Montenegro at least feel hopeful, NGOs and Serbia’s own Commissariat for Refugees admit that many Roma refugees in Serbia are in a worse position. Serbia treats Roma from Kosovo as internally displaced persons (IDPs), but a problem is that many Roma cannot prove that they are from Kosovo and hence cannot access welfare services. “Since most of the Roma who fled from Kosovo did not have IDs while they were in Kosovo, when they came to Serbia they could not gain the documents that other internally displaced people from Kosovo have got,” Jadranka Jelincic, head of the Open Society Foundation – Serbia, explains.

Regular IDPs from Kosovo receive different levels of state aid, including monthly allowances of around €80. However, this kind of help is blocked to these Roma because of lack of proof that they actually come from Kosovo. Although there are no official statistics, the Commissariat for Refugees estimates that about 22,500 Roma from Kosovo have taken refuge in Serbia. NGOs say the real number is much higher, at about 40,000. Most are situated in and around Belgrade. Usually having no documents and living in informal settlements, they are frequent victims of forced evictions and have to move to other informal settlements, collective centres, or return to Kosovo. They are also often hindered from obtaining legal counsel.

One such eviction recently took place in Belgrade, when the city authorities decided to bulldoze ‘Belville’, an informal Roma settlement located in the heart of the city. Nenad Djurdjevic, head of the Directorate for Human and Minority Rights, maintains that the eviction was “an example of good practice.”

Djurdjevic and other Serbian officials insist that some Roma are “abusing” the fact that the city provides accommodation to Roma who possess documents proving that they have resided in the capital for more than five years. “We’ve helped many of them to find accommodation, and those who refused what we offered left their settlements voluntarily,” he maintains. The Commissariat for Refugees also believes it would be “unfair” to local Serbian Roma, who also face housing problems, if those from Kosovo obtained permanent housing in the capital.

Facing Statelessness In Macedonia

According to the Macedonian Ministry of Labour, Macedonia has some 1,200 Kosovo Roma on its territory.

Human rights activists say that only some of the refugees receive proper treatment in Macedonia, as laid down in the 1951 Geneva Convention. A recent report by the international human rights watchdog Amnesty International says that Macedonia’s Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare has “failed to provide them with the financial assistance and housing required under the 2010 local integration agreement”. That year, Macedonia took over responsibility for the Kosovo Roma from the UNHCR, promising to provide a path to local integration for those who wished to stay.

Davor Politov, spokesperson for the ministry, admits that they are helping only a portion of those people, who have obtained refugee or asylum status. “We are providing social welfare, paying health and social insurance contributions and paying [housing] rent for some 780 people from Kosovo who wish to stay here,” Politov says, adding that the country is also trying to find them jobs. Macedonia gives 2,150 denar, (some €35) a month in welfare to each Kosovan refugee, he adds.

The Luxembourg-based non-profit organization, Chachipe, which tackles the human rights situation of Kosovo Roma across the Balkans, says that the situation of some 260 Roma refugees in Macedonia remains a concern. “The situation of refugees in Macedonia has deteriorated considerably following the transfer of responsibility from the UNHCR to the Ministry of Labour,” says Karin Waringo, from Chachipe. After being rejected for asylum, they are now left without any status, stateless, and in dire need of assistance. “Based on our calculations, more than 20% of the refugees have left Macedonia under financial pressures. Some went to Western Europe, where their chances of getting asylum on the basis of the persecution they experienced in Kosovo are slim,” Karin asserted.

The local branch of UNHCR says it has limited resources to help this group of people, but they insist they at least provide them with legal help. UNHCR financial aid for these people stopped in 2010 due to a lack of funds, they say. “Some of them wish to return to Kosovo and we are considering ways to provide them with housing there,” explains Tihomir Nikolovski, Legal Officer at UNHCR Macedonia. “We are also helping some to get Macedonian citizenship, as they have meanwhile established ties with the local population through marriages and are thus eligible,” he adds.

Western Europe Sends Kosovo Roma To Serbia

According to the head of the Belgrade office of the Fund for Open Society, Jadranka Jelincic, the Western European countries that recognise Kosovo as an independent state are misusing the rights that protect refugees and internally displaced people by returning them to Serbia, and not to their country of origin - Kosovo.

Following the war in Kosovo in 1999, around 200,000 people fled to Serbia where they were given the status of the internally displaced people, IDPs. How many subsequently went on to seek asylum in other countries remains unknown.

“People rarely speak about this problem. I understand when Spain returns Kosovo Roma to Serbia, since it does not recognise the independence of Kosovo, but I cannot understand it when the countries that recognize Kosovo, such as Sweden or Finland, do that,” says Jelincic.

The Swedish Agency for Migration says that they are not guided by political, but legal reasons. 

“The documents that Roma IDPs have are either from Serbia or from the former Yugoslavia, and since Serbia is a successor of the former country, we are obliged to send them to Belgrade,” the Swedish Agency for Migration told BIRN.

The Belgrade lawyer Nikola Lazic says that in this situation political conditions cannot be ignored. 

“Bearing in mind the complexity of the situation, until this is legally settled between the countries, the process should be either stopped or resolved differently. For example, people should be asked whether they want to go back to Serbia as IDPs or to Kosovo as returnees, “ explains Lazic.

In 2010 the Council of Europe and Amnesty International called on countries to stop deporting Roma to Kosovo “until it is proven that they could live safely there”.

In its report Amnesty wrote: “Following Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence, the Kosovo authorities have come under increasing pressure from Germany and other EU member states to accept returnees. However, the authorities in Kosovo lack the resources and political will to provide forced returnees with assistance.” 

As a condition of a visa free regime, Serbia signed a readmission agreement with the European Union in January 2008, while Kosovo started signing individual agreements with  EU member states in 2004.

It is not clear how many people should be returned to Serbia on the basis of the readmission agreement. In 2003, the Council of Europe estimated that the figure could be between 50,000 and 100,000 but over the last few years, figures as high as 150,000 have also been cited.

The majority of returnees to Serbia, around 70 per cent, are returning from Western European countries, mainly Germany, followed by Scandinavian countries, Switzerland and The Netherlands.Between 60 and 70 per cent were Roma, according to estimates.

Kosovo declared its independence from Serbia in 2008, but Serbia still regards it as its southern province and opposes its independence.

In Kosovo, dangers in returning home

20/07/2012

One of the challenges for the returnees is their safety and the security.

By Linda Karadaku for Southeast European Times in Pristina -- 20/7/12

More than 330,000 of the 3 million people displaced during the Balkan conflict in the 1990s remain separated from their homes, with as many as 200,000 Kosovars still living in surrounding countries.

Since 2000, more than 23,000 from minority communities have voluntarily returned to Kosovo. But experts say the return and reintegration, especially for the Serb community, can often be difficult.

"The challenges affect not only returnees, but Kosovo society as a whole; weak rule of law, struggling economy, lack of infrastructure, inadequate delivery of basic services, including access to health, education, social protection," Dejan Radivojevic, manager at the Inclusive Local Development, UNDP Kosovo, told SETimes.

Since 2010, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), Croatia, Montenegro, and Serbia renewed their efforts to find permanent solution for some 73,000 refugees from the Yugoslav conflict.

Some 2,200 people, mainly Serbs, remain displaced within Croatia. Montenegro hosts more than 16,000 displaced persons from BiH, Croatia and Kosovo. Macedonia hosts some 1,600 refugees, mostly Roma, from Kosovo.

Jo Hagenauer, the head of Kosovo UNCHR, told SETimes that the return is slow, with many obstacles.

"One of the challenges is that the overall security situation for minorities in Kosovo is relatively stable but fragile. Incidents targeting property of minorities and the quality of response from the law enforcement negatively impacted the perception of Kosovo security among the minority communities," Hagenauer said.

Radivojevic agreed. "Although overall security in Kosovo remains relatively stable, some incidents targeting individual returnees and recent clashes in northern Kosovo continue to pose challenges to the actual and perceived safety of returnees from minority communities, and their freedom of movement in Kosovo," she said.

Hagenauer said that the number of reported security incidents, potentially ethnically motivated, is steadily declining, "However, tensions continue to exist between communities and interactions are still very limited, especially in Kosovo north."

In early July, a Serb couple, Milovan and Liljana Jevtic, returned to Kosovo, but were killed in their house in the Talinoc village, near Ferizaj. Kosovo and international representatives condemned the murders, asking for the perpetrators to face justice, but they are still at large.

"Despite regular co-operation with Kosovo police, the perpetrators remain unidentified and unpunished, therefore, we are for an enlargement of institutional co-operation on all levels, so that security, which is already fragile, does not get more complicated," Radojica Tomic, Kosovo minister for returns and communities, told SETimes.

Tomic said the returns process faces many security challenges for returnees in areas of Albanian majority population.

"We still consider necessary the inter-ethnic dialogue between the local community and the returnees," Tomic told SETimes.

UNHCR confirmed that in the last two years, a total of 159 houses were handed over to returnee families, but in 2012 there has been a slowdown in returns, mainly due to the absence of housing assistance projects and finding a more lasting solution elsewhere.

Economic conditions for both majority and minority communities remain poor in Kosovo. Poverty and unemployment prevail. Some 1,250 internally displaced persons and refugees continue to live in collective centres in Gjilan, Mitrovica and Pristina, UNHCR confirms.

Tomic told the media that 425 people returned in 2011, most of them elderly.

Momcilo Jovanovic, 50, decided to return to Kosovo from Serbia, to the village of Brusince, in Kamenica municipality. He said the main problem is unemployment and his only in

(Message over 64 KB, truncated)

Da: Fabio Muzzolon

Data: 13 agosto 2012 20.05.45 GMT+02.00

in margine alle Olimpiadi (e alle vacanze), un fatto sfuggito sul croato bilingue che ha battuto la nostra medaglia d'argento Massimo Fabbrizi nel tiro a volo... 


SULLA MINORANZA ITALIANA IN CROAZIA.
Mi trovavo da quelle parti quando il tiratore croato, medaglia d'oro olimpica, Giovanni Cernogoraz, professione cameriere di famiglia, veniva festeggiato nella sua Città Nova, in slavo Novi Grad, sulla costa istriana. Il cronista della RAI era un po'  imbarazzato davanti a questo nome  un po' ibrido ed esotico. Un cognome forse strano per un atleta della minoranza italiana che in casa parla dialetto veneto-istriano, cognome scritto in grafia italiana ma che in serbo-croato significa "montenegrino" o di qualche altro Monte Nero nei paraggi, a conferma che le identità non sono mai del tutto separate e definitive.
Qualcuno avrà pensato: ma come può esserci un italiano in Croazia, ex Tito-slavia, non erano stati tutti cacciati o "infoibati"? Eppure da fonti croate si sa che gli italiani dichiarati (senza timori o pigrizie di dichiararsi!) sono almeno 20.000 nella sola Croazia, ma il rappresentante della Comunità Italiana (Talijanska Zajednica) di Dignano-Vodnjan dice che potrebbero aggirarsi sui 35.000, ma la presenza di moltissimi "misti" -tipica eredità jugoslava- rende il conto molto difficile. Tanto più arduo contare gli Istriani e Dalmati che usano l'italiano o il croato in modo bilingue nonostante il crescente centralismo croato. Intanto sempre di più da noi si sente dire "Vado a Porec in Croazia" quando in italiano sarebbe preferibile "Vado in Istria, a Parenzo".

Arrivederci a Rio