Informazione
ROMA: APPUNTAMENTO IL 3 FEBBRAIO ALL'ALTARE DELLA PATRIA
PER DEPORRE UNA CORONA IN MEMORIA DEL "MILITE IGNARO"
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pasti Foundation <pasti@...>
> To: Rete AUI <pasti@...>
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 7:24 PM
> Subject: Notizie Rete Abolire l'Uranio Impoverito
>
>
>
> NOTA INFORMATIVA SULL'ATTIVITA' DELLA RETE ABOLIRE
> L'URANIO IMPOOVERITO
> messaggio spedito da: Paolo Pioppi
>
> Trasmettiamo alcune informazioni circa i passi intrapresi da Falco
> Accame in attuazione di alcuni dei punti programmatici approvati a
> Roma nella riunione del 13 gennaio
>
> I N D I C E
>
> 1) Lettera al Presidente della Repubblica. Risposta del Consigliere
> militare del Presidente. Nuova lettera al Presidente (punto 3 del
> programma)
>
> 2) Lettera al Presidente del Consiglio (punto 4 del programma)
>
> 3) Lettere ai Presidenti di alcune Regioni dove si trovano i poligoni
di
> tiro (punto 5 del programma)
>
> 4) Convocazione di una MANIFESTAZIONE di protesta (punto 6 del
> programma)
>
> ATTENZIONE:
> chiediamo a tutte le associazioni di partecipare sabato 3 febbraio
> alle ore 12 a Roma (Altare della Patria) e a farsi portavoce
> dell'appuntamento. Trovate al punto 4 l'appello per la
> manifestazione che consiste nella posa di una corona al
> monumento al milite ignoto (Altare della Patria). Comunicate
> rapidamente la vostra adesione e partecipazione all'indirizzo
> pasti@.... Grazie
>
> 5) Controcommissione alternativa rispetto a quella istituita da
> Mattarella (punto 7 del programma)
>
> NOTA IMPORTANTE
> Vi chiediamo di tenerci aggiornati sulle vostre attivita' in rapporto
> all'uranio, in modo che si possa contribuire a far circolare le
> informazioni tramite e-mail o fax a tutte le associazioni che hanno
> formato la rete Abolire l'Uranio Impoverito
>
> ************************************************
>
> 1) Lettera al Presidente della Repubblica. Risposta del Consigliere
> militare del Presidente. Nuova lettera al Presidente (punto 3 del
> programma)
>
> Roma, 15 gennaio 2001
>
> Al Presidente della Repubblica
> Il Quirinale
>
>
>
> Signor Presidente,
>
> la morte di alcuni militari italiani e le malattie contratte da altri
> reduci dalle operazioni nei Balcani, che possono essere messe in
> relazione a contaminazione da uranio impoverito, rappresentano dei
> fatti molto gravi che credo impongano una attenta riflessione anche
> ai massimi livelli di responsabilita' nel nostro paese, in quanto
> coinvolgono aspetti della sicurezza nazionale e internazionale e
> soprattutto sono inerenti al diritto umanitario.
>
> In Somalia e poi in Bosnia e nei primi 5 mesi della campagna del
> Kosovo, il personale militare e civile italiano ha operato in assenza
> di norme di protezione, dato che queste sono state emanate in
> data 22 novembre 1999. Eppure in queste missioni gli Stati Uniti
> avevano emanato precise disposizioni di sicurezza per il loro
> personale in relazione ai rischi connessi all'impiego dell'uranio
> impoverito.
>
> Negli USA sono stati condotti da lungo tempo degli studi a partire
> dai primi anni '90 nei quali si afferma, senza ombra di dubbio, la
> pericolosita' legata alla ingestione di polvere di uranio, come
> testimonia un documento emanato nel 1993 (e che fa riferimento a
> precedenti studi del '91) nel quale si afferma tra l'altro che:
> "Quando i soldati si trovano ad inalare o ingestire polvere di uranio
> essi incorrono in un potenziale incremento nel rischio di cancro".
> "When soldiers inhale or ingeste DU dust, they incur a potential
> increase in cancer risk". Il documento e' del direttore della Sanita'
> dell'esercito USA. In un altro documento dell'ottobre 1993, del
> Support Directorate di Washington, si precisano le disposizioni di
> sicurezza da adottare per il personale USA operante in Somalia.
>
> Per quanto concerne la Bosnia, i raid degli aerei A/10, aerei contro-
> carro degli USA (ed anche alcuni raid degli Harrier britannici) erano
> effettuati operando con armi all'uranio. Questi raid sono partiti
dalla
> base di Aviano. Tale base e' al comando di un colonnello
> dell'aereonautica italiana, che quindi e' ovviamente a conoscenza di
> tutti gli ordini di operazione e rapporti di operazione. Egli e'
altresi'
> a conoscenza delle direttive impartite per l'uso delle armi all'uranio
> impoverito e dei risultati ottenuti nelle singole azioni. Il pilota,
tra
> l'altro, nei debriefing al termine della missione riferisce sul numero
> dei proiettili sparati e sui carri armati, ed altri obiettivi,
> eventualmente distrutti.
>
> L'uso dell'uranio impoverito in Bosnia era noto alle autorita'
militari
> italiane operanti in ambito NATO. Infatti anche il comandante della
> V ATAF di Vicenza era a conoscenza di tutti gli ordini e i rapporti
> di operazione e quindi dei compiti svolti nelle missioni degli aerei
> A/10. Cosi' come ne era al corrente il vicecomandante (italiano) di
> AFSOUTH. Del resto l'operazione in Bosnia fu illustrata in una
> conferenza stampa tenutasi proprio a Napoli presso AFSOUTH. In
> Bosnia, oltre ai proiettili all'uranio impoverito furono lanciati 13
> missili da crociera, contenenti anch'essi uranio impoverito.
>
> Circa la pericolosita' delle armi all'uranio, sulla quale sembra
> esservi discussione, vale la pena di ricordare quanto affermato dal
> generale Osvaldo Bizzari nelle succitate norme di sicurezza
> trasmesse ai reparti, nelle quali si legge testualmente: "Inalazioni
> di polvere di uranio impoverito sono associate nel tempo con effetti
> negativi sulla salute quale il tumore e disfunzioni nei neonati".
>
> Non sembra quindi esservi dubbio alcuno sulla valutazione di
> pericolosita' dell'uranio che e' stata fatta da parte italiana e
quindi
> sui rischi connessi, anche se nel campo epidemiologico non si
> possono avere certezze di tipo meccanico, cioe' deterministiche,
> ma solo relazioni probabilistiche. Forse l'unica certezza che si puo'
> avere e' quella che non vi possono essere certezze di non
> pericolosita' e che quindi si ha a che fare inevitabilmente con dei
> rischi, che possono essere piu' o meno grandi in dipendenza di
> molti fattori.
>
> Per quanto riguarda la pericolosita' dell'uranio, recenti studi hanno
> dimostrato in molti casi la presenza contemporanea anche di
> plutonio, materiale particolarmente nocivo specie in relazione alle
> leucemie.
>
> L'esistenza di rischi e' ben nota negli Stati Uniti in base alle
> esperienze di massa avute nella guerra del Golfo, esperienze che
> hanno dato luogo appunto alla emanazione di norme di sicurezza
> per proteggere il personale per quanto possibile. La protezione del
> personale, militare e civile, e' affidata peraltro non solo alla
> esistenza e conoscenza minuziosa delle norme (e a uno specifico
> addestramento all'applicazione delle norme stesse) ma anche alla
> disponibilita' di mezzi per applicare le norme, come tute protettive
> ricambiabili (data l'esigenza del loro assai frequente lavaggio),
> maschere protettive a perdere, guanti a perdere e cosi'
> via.
>
> Quanto al personale civile italiano, che tra l'altro e' quello che
piu' a
> lungo ha sostato nelle zone contaminate, non risulta che questo
> disponesse del materiale necessario alla protezione e quindi,
> anche nell'eventualita' che fosse stato messo a conoscenza delle
> norme, non avrebbe potuto osservarle. Per quanto riguarda il
> personale militare pare che i mezzi a disposizione siano stati
> alquanto scarsi.
>
> Altro problema riguarda le visite mediche a cui andava sottoposto il
> personale prima, durante e dopo la missione. Purtroppo in Italia
> esistono solo pochissimi centri specializzati che sono in grado di
> effettuare le delicate analisi spettrografiche e quant'altro occorre.
A
> quanto e' dato sapere vi sono state gravi carenze sotto questo
> riguardo e ad oggi migliaia di persone devono essere sottoposte a
> visiste mediche, il che pone dei problemi non indifferenti. Risulta
> che vi siano persone che hanno dovuto effettuare a spese proprie le
> analisi, mentre non vi e' alcun dubbio che tale assistenza debba
> essere a carico dello Stato.
>
> Questa problematica ci porta al discorso relativo alle cure mediche
> concernenti coloro che sono risultati affetti da patologie. Anche qui
> si e' verificato purtroppo il fatto che molte persone si sono dovute
> rivolgere, con ingenti spese, a istituti privati.
>
> Tale problematica ci rimanda alla questione delle cause di servizio
> e dell'equo indennizzo. Le "cause di servizio" vengono stabilite
> nella grande maggioranza dei casi in base a valutazioni
> probabilistiche e questo deve valere anche per la contaminazione
> da uranio che concerne i reduci dalla guerra del Golfo, dalla
> Somalia e dalla ex Jugoslavia. E a tale riguardo si pone anche
> un'altra tematica. Le operazioni di pace compiute sono in realta'
> frammiste ad azioni di guerra. Un soldato che muore in una
> missione di pace dovrebbe quindi essere considerato, dal punto di
> vista dei risarcimenti, come un soldato caduto in guerra. La
> questione coinvolge anche, ovviamente, civili che hanno operato in
> un'area dove si sono svolte operazioni militari.
>
> Di particolare rilevanza e' il problema dei risarcimenti per i
familiari
> delle vittime. Esiste in merito una legislazione molto confusa. Le
> piu' recenti determinazioni sono quelle che hanno valutato i
> risarcimenti dovuti nella misura di 4 miliardi a famiglia e si
> riferiscono alle vittime del tranciamento del cavo della funivia del
> Cermis. Nel caso dei parenti delle vittime della sciagura di Ustica
> sono stati stanziati all'incirca 150 milioni per famiglia. Una cifra
di
> quest'ordine di grandezza e' stata stanziata per le vittime della
> strage di Bologna e per le vittime della tragedia di Casalecchio sul
> Reno.
>
> Altra problematica riguarda l'inquinamento prodotto dall'uso di
> mezzi contenenti uranio nei poligoni di tiro, perche' vi sono casi di
> patologie riscontrate in personale che ha operato nei poligoni.
> L'inquinamento riguarda peraltro anche le acque dell'Adriatico in cui
> sono stati sparati (per prova di corretto funzionamento delle armi
> prima di ogni missione) proiettili all'uranio impoverito.
>
> Infine si pone il problema che per la sua importanza in senso
> globale e' certamente prioritario e che riguarda i risarcimenti in
> campo internazionale per le popolazioni che sono state interessate
> alle conseguenze derivanti dall'impiego di armi all'uranio, i cui
effetti
> di radiazione e tossicita' si protraggono nel tempo molto dopo il
> conflitto e che per questo, come avviene per le armi chimiche,
> dovrebbero essere bandite.
>
> Per la gravita' dei problemi sopra elencati, che riguardano oltreche'
> personale civile anche personale militare italiano, Le chiediamo
> (anche in riferimento alla precedente lettera inviataLe in data
> 22/12/2000) in qualita' di Capo delle Forze Armate, di convocare il
> Consiglio Superiore della Difesa, organo a cui possono partecipare
> ministri responsabili di vari settori nonche' esperti.
>
> Falco Accame
> Presidente Ana-Vafaf
> e a nome della Rete AUI
>
> L'elenco dei componenti della Rete AUI (Aboliamo l'Uranio
> Impoverito) e' riportato in allegato.
>
>
>
> RISPOSTA DEL CONSIGLIERE MILITARE DEL PRESIDENTE
> DELLA REPUBBLICA
>
>
> Roma, 19 gennaio 2001.
>
> Onorevole,
>
> Mi riferisco al Suo Appello al Presidente della Repubblica per la
> convocazione del Conbsiglio Supremo della Difesa perche' esamini
> la problematica dei possibili rischi connessi con l'impiego nei
> Balcani di munizioni all'uranio impoverito.
>
> Il Presidente segue con particolare attenzione l'approfondimento
> delle verifiche e delle ricerche disposte dal Ministro della Difesa.
>
> La Magistratura sta a sua volta indagando su eventuali ipotesi di
> reato.
>
> La definizione dei dati medico-scientifici relativi alle attuali
ipotesi
> di rischio e' pregiudiziale all'avvio di nuove iniziative.
>
> Cordialmente
> Sergio Biraghi
>
>
> SECONDA LETTERA AL PRESIDENTE DELLA REPUBBLICA
>
> Roma, 26 gennaio 2001
>
> Signor Presidente,
>
> La ringrazio della cortese risposta in data 19/1/2001 che mi ha
> fatto pervenire tramite il suo consigliere militare. E' certamente
> importante conoscere che cosa dira' la commissione medico-
> scientifica del prof. Mandelli e le altre commissioni che sono state
> nominate. Tuttavia gia' sappiamo che queste commissioni a
> proposito dei casi di tumori e leucemie ed altro contratte da alcuni
> nostri militari non potranno con certezza affermare ne' che le
> affezioni sopra indicate sicuramente derivano da contaminazione
> per uranio impoverito (e metalli associati), ne' che dette affezioni
> sicuramente non derivano da uranio impoverito.
>
> Si resta insomma inevitabilmente nel campo delle probabilita', piu'
> o meno grandi, che e' emersa dall'analisi delle migliaia di casi
> verificatisi in Iraq tra la popolazione civile e nei reduci della
guerra
> del Golfo. Le decine di casi italiani non potranno certamente
> modificare queste valutazioni.
>
> D'altra parte tali valutazioni hanno fatto si' che gli Stati Uniti
> abbiano emanato fin dal 1993, in occasione dell'impiego delle
> truppe in Somalia, norme di sicurezza molto stringenti che
> mettevano in evidenza i rischi di tumori e malformazioni alla
> nascita, come e' stato ricordato anche recentemente dal
> settimanale tedesco «Der Spiegel» del 22 gennaio 2001 e prima
> anvcora da «Il Giornale dei Militari» del 27/11/2000. Del resto nel
> quotidianoo «San Francisco Examiner» del 21 giugno 1998 si
> legge che il regolamento militare USA di medicina preventiva (Art.
> 40-45) prevede che "vengano eseguiti dei test medici qualora si
> ritenga che materiali radioattivi siano stati impiegati in modo tale
da
> poter essere stati ingeriti, inalati o assorbiti all'interno del
corpo".
> Viene precisato inoltre: "Il Col. Cherry afferma che questo e' stato
> fatto in Somalia durante una missione di pace delle Nazioni Unite
> nel 1992 e che attualmente tale regolamento viene applicato in
> Corea, Bosnia e nel Golfo Persico".
>
> Da un punto di vista umanitario (rispecchiato anche nel recente
> diritto internazionale) occorreva quanto meno avvertire le
> popolazioni delle zone colpite dei rischi presenti anche dopo la
> cessazione delle azioni di fuoco e dopo il termine del conflitto.
>
> La conoscenza dei pericoli dell'uranio impoverito era ben nota alla
> sanita' militare internazionale nel quadro delle relazioni
interalleate.
> Si tratta di materia che e' perfino esposta nelle "sinossi" in uso
> presso le nostre scuole militari! Inoltre, l'argomento e' ben noto da
> tempo attraverso la pubblicistica, niente affatto segreta, come i
libri
> dell'ex ministro della giustizia USA, Ramsey Clark: "The fire this
> time" e "The metal of dishonour", quest'ultimo anche tradotto in
> italiano.
>
> Certamente quindi la questione dell'uranio impoverito non poteva
> essere sfuggita all'attenzione, oltreche' dei servizi di informazione
> italiani, anche dell'ambito sanitario-ambientale e degli addetti
militari
> italiani presso le ambasciate nei paesi in cui questo materiale
> veniva usato.
>
> Nelle norme di sicurezza emanate il 22 novembre 1999 nel quadro
> della forza multilaterale nei Balcani (a firma del colonnello Osvaldo
> Bizzari, specializzato NBC) il rischio e' presentificato in termini di
> possibilita' di contrazione di tumori e di malformazioni alla nascita.
> Purtroppo queste norme (che comunque non sono state diffuse tra
> i civili) non hanno riguardato, oltreche' i primi sei mesi della
> campagna in Kosovo, i periodi delle campagne in Somalia e in
> Bosnia. Inoltre i mezzi e le procedure da mettere in atto per ridurre
> il rischio non erano disponibili alla componente civile. Il problema
> sussiste anche nei poligoni di tiro dove forze alleate usano
> armamenti all'uranio impoverito.
>
> Su questo problema che riguarda il "milite ignaro" (ma anche il
> "civile ignaro") ritengo che debba essere portata l'attenzione delle
> superiori autorita' indipendentemente anche da quali possono
> essere le conclusioni delle commissioni medico-scientifiche.
>
> In particolare pare che ogni sforzo debba pertanto essere compiuto
> per accertare come sia stato possibile che una materia cosi'
> gravida di implicazioni, da una parte per i nostri civili e militari
> impiegati nelle zone di operazione e, dall'altra parte (e in primo
> luogo) per le popolazioni civili sia sfuggita all'attenzione dei
> Ministeri dela Difesa, dell'Interno, della Sanita', dell'Ambiente.
>
> Credo che l'opinione pubblica non debba essere lasciata all'oscuro
> di quanto avviene in determinate istituzioni come e' accaduto,
> limitandoci a vicende recenti, per quanto riguarda Ustica, le
> violenze in Somalia, il Cermis, il caso Scieri. Il pericolo e' che
> venga minata la credibilita' dello Stato e la trasparenza del suo
> agire, che costituisce un sine qua non per una democrazia.
>
> E' per questi motivi che lo scrivente riteneva che la convocazione
> del Consiglio Supremo di Difesa potesse costituire un segnale
> positivo in rapporto al fatto che di fronte alla morte e alle gravi
> patologie manifestatesi in numerosi militari si voglia operare nel
> senso della difesa del loro elementare diritto ad essere informati,
> preventivamente e durante le operazioni, mentre si ha l'impressione
> che vi siano soprattutto preoccupazioni per l'autodifesa delle
> istituzioni.
>
> Falco Accame
> presidente ANA-Vafaf
> e a nome della rete AUI
> ********************************************************************
>
> 2) Lettera al Presidente del Consiglio (punto 4 del programma)
>
> Roma, 23 gennaio 2001
>
> Al Presidente del Consiglio prof. Giuliano Amato
>
> Signor Presidente del Consiglio,
>
> faccio seguito alle lettere scritteLe in precedenza (vedi allegato)
> circa la questione dell'uranio impoverito e dei rischi corsi dal
nostro
> personale, civile e militare, prima in Somalia e poi in Bosnia e
> quanto meno 5 mesi nel Kosovo, in quanto non era stato informato
> della situazione e non erano stati assicurati i mezzi di protezione.
> (Il personale civile non e' mai stato dotato di mezzi di protezione,
> ne' gli sono state fornite istruzioni in merito).
>
> La problematica relativa a questa vicenda e' specificata in dettaglio
> nella lettera che ho scritto al Presidente della repubblica e che Le
> allego in copia.
>
> Nel frattempo si e' costituita la rete AUI (Aboliamo l'Uranio
> Impoverito). Anche a nome di questa rete Le chiedo un incontro in
> tempi brevi con una delegazione per esporLe alcuni dei problemi
> prioritari da affrontare.
>
> Falco Accame
>
> ***************************************************************
>
> 3) Lettere ai Presidenti di alcune Regioni dove si trovano i poligoni
di
> tiro (punto 5 del programma)
>
> REGIONE LAZIO
>
> Roma, 23 gennaio 2001
>
> Al Presidente della Regione Lazio
> On. Francesco Storace
>
> Signor Presidente
>
> nel poligono di tiro di Nettuno si sono svolte e si svolgono
> esercitazioni a cui partecipano mezzi con la presenza di uranio
> impoverito.
>
> Di recente sono emersi casi di patologie sospette in cui si rivela la
> possibilita' di inquinamento da detto materiale.
>
> Il Presidente della Regione Sarda, Mario Floris, ha chiesto un
> incontro (vedi allegato) con il Presidente del Consiglio e il Ministro
> della Difesa. Per quanto concerne i poligoni si rende necessario un
> monitoraggio dell'area con appositi mezzi che spesso eccedono le
> possibilita' dei nuclei NBC.
>
> La problematica riguardante l'uso di armi all'uranio impoverito e'
> esposta nella allegata lettera scritta al Presidente della Repubblica.
>
> Anche a nome della Rete AUI (Aboliamo l'uranio impoverito!) Le
> chiediamo di intraprendere misure per verificare le condizioni di
> rischio eventualmente presenti nell'area e adottare le misure
> conseguenti.
>
> Falco Accame
>
>
> REGIONE CAMPANIA
>
> Roma, 23 gennaio 2001.
>
> Al Presidente della Regione Campania
> On. Antonio Bassolino
>
> Signor Presidente
>
> nel poligono di Persano si sono svolte e si svolgono esercitazioni a
> cui
> partecipano mezzi con la presenza di uranio impoverito.
>
> Di recente sono emersi casi di patologie sospette in cui si rivela la
> possibilita' di inquinamento da detto materiale.
>
> Il Presidente della Regione Sarda, Mario Floris, ha chiesto un
> incontro (vedi allegato) con il Presidente del Consiglio e il Ministro
> della Difesa. Per quanto concerne i poligoni si rende necessario un
> monitoraggio dell'area con appositi mezzi che spesso eccedono le
> possibilita' dei nuclei NBC.
>
> La problematica riguardante l'uso di armi all'uranio impoverito e'
> esposta nella allegata lettera scritta al Presidente della Repubblica.
>
> Anche a nome della Rete AUI (Aboliamo l'uranio impoverito!) Le
> chiediamo di intraprendere misure per verificare le condizioni di
> rischio eventualmente presenti nell'area e adottare le misure
> conseguenti.
>
> Falco Accame
>
> REGIONE FRIULI
>
> Roma, 23 gennaio 2001
>
> Al Presidente della Regione Friuli
> dott. Roberto Antonione
>
> Signor Presidente
>
> nei poligoni di tiro del Friuli si sono svolte e si svolgono
> esercitazioni a cui partecipano mezzi con la presenza di uranio
> impoverito.
>
> Di recente sono emersi casi di patologie sospette in cui si rivela la
> possibilita' di inquinamento da detto materiale.
>
> Il Presidente della Regione Sarda, Mario Floris, ha chiesto un
> incontro (vedi allegato) con il Presidente del Consiglio e il Ministro
> della Difesa. Per quanto concerne i poligoni si rende necessario un
> monitoraggio dell'area con appositi mezzi che spesso eccedono le
> possibilita' dei nuclei NBC.
>
> La problematica riguardante l'uso di armi all'uranio impoverito e'
> esposta nella allegata lettera scritta al Presidente della Repubblica.
>
> Anche a nome della Rete AUI (Aboliamo l'uranio impoverito!) Le
> chiediamo di intraprendere misure per verificare le condizioni di
> rischio eventualmente presenti nell'area e adottare le misure
> conseguenti.
>
> Falco Accame
>
> Notizie riguardanti i poligoni:
> 1. La procura di Bari avvia un'indagine sulle basi pugliesi (Il Tempo,
> 26 gennaio 2001) 2. La procura della Repubblica di Pordenone ha
> avviato un'inchiesta sul poligono del Dandolo (Maniago, Friuli) (Il
> Tempo 26/1) 3. Interrogazione del parlamentare della Lega Edouard
> Ballaman sul poligono del Dandolo in rapporto alla malattia di due
> militari (Medssaggero Veneto 24/1/01)
>
> °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
>
> 4) Convocazione di una manifestazione di protesta (punto 6 del
> programma)
>
> PORTIAMO UNA CORONA AL "MILITE IGNARO"
>
> Sabato 3 febbraio - ore 12
> Appuntamento a Roma, piazza Venezia
> davanti all'Altare della Patria - monumento al milite ignoto.
>
>
> UNA CORONA PER I MILITARI E I CIVILI VITTIME DELL'URANIO,
> INVIATI NEI BALCANI SENZA NESSUNA PROTEZIONE
>
> UNA CORONA ANCHE PER LE POPOLAZIONI COLPITE,
> NELL'IMMEDIATO E PER UN TEMPO INDEFINITO, DAGLI
> EFFETTI DI ARMI CHE LE CONVENZIONI ESISTENTI SONO GIA'
> SUFFICIENTI A BANDIRE
>
> Iraq (1991), Somalia (1993), Bosnia (1994-95), Jugoslavia (1999).
> L'utilizzo delle armi all'uranio configura un c r i m i n e c o n t r
o
> l' u m a n i t a'. Altro che operazioni umanitarie, guerre
chirurgiche,
> armi intelligenti! Hanno inaugurato invece la guerra nucleare di
> bassa intensita'. Bisogna impedire che possano continuare.
>
> Le morti per leucemia o affezioni simili di reduci dai Balcani hanno
> contribuito finalmente a squarciare la coltre del silenzio che ha
> circondato questi crimini per tanto tempo. Adesso non lasciamo
> sole le vittime. Non lasciamo impuniti i responsabili.
>
> Ministri e alti vertici militari sono stati colti in flagranti
> contraddizioni. Hanno ignorato a lungo quello che assolutamente
> non potevano e non dovevano ignorare. Hanno cambiato piu' volte
> versione, adattandola alle circostanze che via via emergevano.
> Hanno cercato e cercano di scaricare su altri le loro responsabilita'
> o di minimizzare i fatti.
>
>
> CHI E' COLPEVOLE DEVE PAGARE E DEVE INTANTO SUBITO
> ESSERE ALLONTANATO DAGLI INCARICHI CHE RICOPRE
>
> DEVONO ESSERE PRESE MISURE IMMEDIATE PER
> RISARCIRE E PER ASSISTERE DAL PUNTO DI VISTA
> SANITARIO SIA I MILITARI E I CIVILI ITALIANI, SIA LE
> POPOLAZIONI COLPITE.
>
> Coordinamento aboliamo l'uranio
> impoverito
>
> ATTENZIONE:
> chiediamo a tutte le associazioni di partecipare sabato 3 febbraio
> alle ore 12 a Roma (Altare della Patria) e a farsi portavoce
> dell'appuntamento. Comunicate rapidamente la vostra adesione e
> partecipazione all'indirizzo pasti@... oppure al fax 06
> 8174010. Grazie
>
> *********************************************************************
>
> 5) Controcommissione alternativa rispetto a quella istituita da
> Mattarella (punto 7 del programma)
>
> D'intesa con il Tribunale Clark, che ha tenuto la sua seduta il
> giorno 13 nel pomeriggio, dopo l'assemblea della Rete AUI,
> abbiamo verificato la disponibilita' di alcuni specialisti a
costituire
> detta commissione, la cui costituzione e' stata annunciata alla
> stampa e ripresa anche da alcuni giornali (per esempio il Manifesto
> del 20/1/01) il 19 gennaio nel corso della conferenza stampa del
> Tribunale tenuta al Senato con Ramsey Clark, ex ministro della
> giustizia USA e coautore del libro denuncia sull'iuranio impoverito,
> The Metal of dishonor.
>
> La possibilita' di visionare gli atti della Commissione istituita dal
> Ministero della Difesa (commissione Mandelli) e di affiancare con
> esperti di parte quelli gia' nominati, e' stata richiesta
ufficialmente
> al Ministro.
>
> Gli scienziati che hanno dato la loro disponibilita' sono stati
> contattati tramite Mauro Cristaldi del "Comitato scienziate e
> scienziati contro la guerra". Coloro che hanno dato finora la loro
> disponibilita' sono: Carlo Pona, fisico, Roma; Francesca Degrassi,
> mutagenista, Roma; Valerio Gennao, epidemiologo, Genova;
> Giorgio Cortellessa, fisico nucleare, Roma; Livio Giuliano,
> matematico, Roma; Paolo Manzelli, chimico, Firenze; Massimo
> Zucchetti, ingegnere nucleare, Torino; Alessandra Signorini;
> Angelo Baracca, Firenze; Fabrizio Fabbri, naturalista;Mauro
> Cristaldi, naturalista, Roma.
>
> Si tratta di persone altamente qualificate, dalla cui collaborazione
> ci aspettiamo molto. Molti di loro figurano tra gli oratori del
> convegno organizzato dalle scienziate e scienziati contro la guerra
> a Torino il 22-23 giugno 2000 (gli atti sono pubblicati nel libro
> Contro le Nuove Guerre, Odradek, 2000). Venerdi' 2 febbraio il
> Tribunale Clark ha convocato con loro e con gli avvocati che hanno
> dato la loro disponibilita' una prima riunione per coordinare
l'attivita'.
>
> Per quanto riguarda il prof. Massimo Zucchetti di Torino,
> segnaliamo una sua intervista su "Il Tempo" del 27/1/01.
>
>
**************************************************************************
> Vi chiediamo di tenerci aggiornati sulle vostre attivita' in rapporto
> all'uranio, in modo che si possa contribuire a far circolare le
> informazioni tramite e-mail o fax a tutte le associazioni che hanno
> formato la rete Abolire l'Uranio Impoverito
>
>
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Se vuoi sviluppare il tuo business, entra anche tu in
Consulteque.com, la piu grande community on line di
professionisti, dove l'offerta incontra la domanda delle imprese.
E poi potrai leggere le news, discutere con gli altri nel forum,
organizzare con noi i tuoi viaggi e molto altro ...
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1084757/www.consulteque.com
PER DEPORRE UNA CORONA IN MEMORIA DEL "MILITE IGNARO"
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pasti Foundation <pasti@...>
> To: Rete AUI <pasti@...>
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 7:24 PM
> Subject: Notizie Rete Abolire l'Uranio Impoverito
>
>
>
> NOTA INFORMATIVA SULL'ATTIVITA' DELLA RETE ABOLIRE
> L'URANIO IMPOOVERITO
> messaggio spedito da: Paolo Pioppi
>
> Trasmettiamo alcune informazioni circa i passi intrapresi da Falco
> Accame in attuazione di alcuni dei punti programmatici approvati a
> Roma nella riunione del 13 gennaio
>
> I N D I C E
>
> 1) Lettera al Presidente della Repubblica. Risposta del Consigliere
> militare del Presidente. Nuova lettera al Presidente (punto 3 del
> programma)
>
> 2) Lettera al Presidente del Consiglio (punto 4 del programma)
>
> 3) Lettere ai Presidenti di alcune Regioni dove si trovano i poligoni
di
> tiro (punto 5 del programma)
>
> 4) Convocazione di una MANIFESTAZIONE di protesta (punto 6 del
> programma)
>
> ATTENZIONE:
> chiediamo a tutte le associazioni di partecipare sabato 3 febbraio
> alle ore 12 a Roma (Altare della Patria) e a farsi portavoce
> dell'appuntamento. Trovate al punto 4 l'appello per la
> manifestazione che consiste nella posa di una corona al
> monumento al milite ignoto (Altare della Patria). Comunicate
> rapidamente la vostra adesione e partecipazione all'indirizzo
> pasti@.... Grazie
>
> 5) Controcommissione alternativa rispetto a quella istituita da
> Mattarella (punto 7 del programma)
>
> NOTA IMPORTANTE
> Vi chiediamo di tenerci aggiornati sulle vostre attivita' in rapporto
> all'uranio, in modo che si possa contribuire a far circolare le
> informazioni tramite e-mail o fax a tutte le associazioni che hanno
> formato la rete Abolire l'Uranio Impoverito
>
> ************************************************
>
> 1) Lettera al Presidente della Repubblica. Risposta del Consigliere
> militare del Presidente. Nuova lettera al Presidente (punto 3 del
> programma)
>
> Roma, 15 gennaio 2001
>
> Al Presidente della Repubblica
> Il Quirinale
>
>
>
> Signor Presidente,
>
> la morte di alcuni militari italiani e le malattie contratte da altri
> reduci dalle operazioni nei Balcani, che possono essere messe in
> relazione a contaminazione da uranio impoverito, rappresentano dei
> fatti molto gravi che credo impongano una attenta riflessione anche
> ai massimi livelli di responsabilita' nel nostro paese, in quanto
> coinvolgono aspetti della sicurezza nazionale e internazionale e
> soprattutto sono inerenti al diritto umanitario.
>
> In Somalia e poi in Bosnia e nei primi 5 mesi della campagna del
> Kosovo, il personale militare e civile italiano ha operato in assenza
> di norme di protezione, dato che queste sono state emanate in
> data 22 novembre 1999. Eppure in queste missioni gli Stati Uniti
> avevano emanato precise disposizioni di sicurezza per il loro
> personale in relazione ai rischi connessi all'impiego dell'uranio
> impoverito.
>
> Negli USA sono stati condotti da lungo tempo degli studi a partire
> dai primi anni '90 nei quali si afferma, senza ombra di dubbio, la
> pericolosita' legata alla ingestione di polvere di uranio, come
> testimonia un documento emanato nel 1993 (e che fa riferimento a
> precedenti studi del '91) nel quale si afferma tra l'altro che:
> "Quando i soldati si trovano ad inalare o ingestire polvere di uranio
> essi incorrono in un potenziale incremento nel rischio di cancro".
> "When soldiers inhale or ingeste DU dust, they incur a potential
> increase in cancer risk". Il documento e' del direttore della Sanita'
> dell'esercito USA. In un altro documento dell'ottobre 1993, del
> Support Directorate di Washington, si precisano le disposizioni di
> sicurezza da adottare per il personale USA operante in Somalia.
>
> Per quanto concerne la Bosnia, i raid degli aerei A/10, aerei contro-
> carro degli USA (ed anche alcuni raid degli Harrier britannici) erano
> effettuati operando con armi all'uranio. Questi raid sono partiti
dalla
> base di Aviano. Tale base e' al comando di un colonnello
> dell'aereonautica italiana, che quindi e' ovviamente a conoscenza di
> tutti gli ordini di operazione e rapporti di operazione. Egli e'
altresi'
> a conoscenza delle direttive impartite per l'uso delle armi all'uranio
> impoverito e dei risultati ottenuti nelle singole azioni. Il pilota,
tra
> l'altro, nei debriefing al termine della missione riferisce sul numero
> dei proiettili sparati e sui carri armati, ed altri obiettivi,
> eventualmente distrutti.
>
> L'uso dell'uranio impoverito in Bosnia era noto alle autorita'
militari
> italiane operanti in ambito NATO. Infatti anche il comandante della
> V ATAF di Vicenza era a conoscenza di tutti gli ordini e i rapporti
> di operazione e quindi dei compiti svolti nelle missioni degli aerei
> A/10. Cosi' come ne era al corrente il vicecomandante (italiano) di
> AFSOUTH. Del resto l'operazione in Bosnia fu illustrata in una
> conferenza stampa tenutasi proprio a Napoli presso AFSOUTH. In
> Bosnia, oltre ai proiettili all'uranio impoverito furono lanciati 13
> missili da crociera, contenenti anch'essi uranio impoverito.
>
> Circa la pericolosita' delle armi all'uranio, sulla quale sembra
> esservi discussione, vale la pena di ricordare quanto affermato dal
> generale Osvaldo Bizzari nelle succitate norme di sicurezza
> trasmesse ai reparti, nelle quali si legge testualmente: "Inalazioni
> di polvere di uranio impoverito sono associate nel tempo con effetti
> negativi sulla salute quale il tumore e disfunzioni nei neonati".
>
> Non sembra quindi esservi dubbio alcuno sulla valutazione di
> pericolosita' dell'uranio che e' stata fatta da parte italiana e
quindi
> sui rischi connessi, anche se nel campo epidemiologico non si
> possono avere certezze di tipo meccanico, cioe' deterministiche,
> ma solo relazioni probabilistiche. Forse l'unica certezza che si puo'
> avere e' quella che non vi possono essere certezze di non
> pericolosita' e che quindi si ha a che fare inevitabilmente con dei
> rischi, che possono essere piu' o meno grandi in dipendenza di
> molti fattori.
>
> Per quanto riguarda la pericolosita' dell'uranio, recenti studi hanno
> dimostrato in molti casi la presenza contemporanea anche di
> plutonio, materiale particolarmente nocivo specie in relazione alle
> leucemie.
>
> L'esistenza di rischi e' ben nota negli Stati Uniti in base alle
> esperienze di massa avute nella guerra del Golfo, esperienze che
> hanno dato luogo appunto alla emanazione di norme di sicurezza
> per proteggere il personale per quanto possibile. La protezione del
> personale, militare e civile, e' affidata peraltro non solo alla
> esistenza e conoscenza minuziosa delle norme (e a uno specifico
> addestramento all'applicazione delle norme stesse) ma anche alla
> disponibilita' di mezzi per applicare le norme, come tute protettive
> ricambiabili (data l'esigenza del loro assai frequente lavaggio),
> maschere protettive a perdere, guanti a perdere e cosi'
> via.
>
> Quanto al personale civile italiano, che tra l'altro e' quello che
piu' a
> lungo ha sostato nelle zone contaminate, non risulta che questo
> disponesse del materiale necessario alla protezione e quindi,
> anche nell'eventualita' che fosse stato messo a conoscenza delle
> norme, non avrebbe potuto osservarle. Per quanto riguarda il
> personale militare pare che i mezzi a disposizione siano stati
> alquanto scarsi.
>
> Altro problema riguarda le visite mediche a cui andava sottoposto il
> personale prima, durante e dopo la missione. Purtroppo in Italia
> esistono solo pochissimi centri specializzati che sono in grado di
> effettuare le delicate analisi spettrografiche e quant'altro occorre.
A
> quanto e' dato sapere vi sono state gravi carenze sotto questo
> riguardo e ad oggi migliaia di persone devono essere sottoposte a
> visiste mediche, il che pone dei problemi non indifferenti. Risulta
> che vi siano persone che hanno dovuto effettuare a spese proprie le
> analisi, mentre non vi e' alcun dubbio che tale assistenza debba
> essere a carico dello Stato.
>
> Questa problematica ci porta al discorso relativo alle cure mediche
> concernenti coloro che sono risultati affetti da patologie. Anche qui
> si e' verificato purtroppo il fatto che molte persone si sono dovute
> rivolgere, con ingenti spese, a istituti privati.
>
> Tale problematica ci rimanda alla questione delle cause di servizio
> e dell'equo indennizzo. Le "cause di servizio" vengono stabilite
> nella grande maggioranza dei casi in base a valutazioni
> probabilistiche e questo deve valere anche per la contaminazione
> da uranio che concerne i reduci dalla guerra del Golfo, dalla
> Somalia e dalla ex Jugoslavia. E a tale riguardo si pone anche
> un'altra tematica. Le operazioni di pace compiute sono in realta'
> frammiste ad azioni di guerra. Un soldato che muore in una
> missione di pace dovrebbe quindi essere considerato, dal punto di
> vista dei risarcimenti, come un soldato caduto in guerra. La
> questione coinvolge anche, ovviamente, civili che hanno operato in
> un'area dove si sono svolte operazioni militari.
>
> Di particolare rilevanza e' il problema dei risarcimenti per i
familiari
> delle vittime. Esiste in merito una legislazione molto confusa. Le
> piu' recenti determinazioni sono quelle che hanno valutato i
> risarcimenti dovuti nella misura di 4 miliardi a famiglia e si
> riferiscono alle vittime del tranciamento del cavo della funivia del
> Cermis. Nel caso dei parenti delle vittime della sciagura di Ustica
> sono stati stanziati all'incirca 150 milioni per famiglia. Una cifra
di
> quest'ordine di grandezza e' stata stanziata per le vittime della
> strage di Bologna e per le vittime della tragedia di Casalecchio sul
> Reno.
>
> Altra problematica riguarda l'inquinamento prodotto dall'uso di
> mezzi contenenti uranio nei poligoni di tiro, perche' vi sono casi di
> patologie riscontrate in personale che ha operato nei poligoni.
> L'inquinamento riguarda peraltro anche le acque dell'Adriatico in cui
> sono stati sparati (per prova di corretto funzionamento delle armi
> prima di ogni missione) proiettili all'uranio impoverito.
>
> Infine si pone il problema che per la sua importanza in senso
> globale e' certamente prioritario e che riguarda i risarcimenti in
> campo internazionale per le popolazioni che sono state interessate
> alle conseguenze derivanti dall'impiego di armi all'uranio, i cui
effetti
> di radiazione e tossicita' si protraggono nel tempo molto dopo il
> conflitto e che per questo, come avviene per le armi chimiche,
> dovrebbero essere bandite.
>
> Per la gravita' dei problemi sopra elencati, che riguardano oltreche'
> personale civile anche personale militare italiano, Le chiediamo
> (anche in riferimento alla precedente lettera inviataLe in data
> 22/12/2000) in qualita' di Capo delle Forze Armate, di convocare il
> Consiglio Superiore della Difesa, organo a cui possono partecipare
> ministri responsabili di vari settori nonche' esperti.
>
> Falco Accame
> Presidente Ana-Vafaf
> e a nome della Rete AUI
>
> L'elenco dei componenti della Rete AUI (Aboliamo l'Uranio
> Impoverito) e' riportato in allegato.
>
>
>
> RISPOSTA DEL CONSIGLIERE MILITARE DEL PRESIDENTE
> DELLA REPUBBLICA
>
>
> Roma, 19 gennaio 2001.
>
> Onorevole,
>
> Mi riferisco al Suo Appello al Presidente della Repubblica per la
> convocazione del Conbsiglio Supremo della Difesa perche' esamini
> la problematica dei possibili rischi connessi con l'impiego nei
> Balcani di munizioni all'uranio impoverito.
>
> Il Presidente segue con particolare attenzione l'approfondimento
> delle verifiche e delle ricerche disposte dal Ministro della Difesa.
>
> La Magistratura sta a sua volta indagando su eventuali ipotesi di
> reato.
>
> La definizione dei dati medico-scientifici relativi alle attuali
ipotesi
> di rischio e' pregiudiziale all'avvio di nuove iniziative.
>
> Cordialmente
> Sergio Biraghi
>
>
> SECONDA LETTERA AL PRESIDENTE DELLA REPUBBLICA
>
> Roma, 26 gennaio 2001
>
> Signor Presidente,
>
> La ringrazio della cortese risposta in data 19/1/2001 che mi ha
> fatto pervenire tramite il suo consigliere militare. E' certamente
> importante conoscere che cosa dira' la commissione medico-
> scientifica del prof. Mandelli e le altre commissioni che sono state
> nominate. Tuttavia gia' sappiamo che queste commissioni a
> proposito dei casi di tumori e leucemie ed altro contratte da alcuni
> nostri militari non potranno con certezza affermare ne' che le
> affezioni sopra indicate sicuramente derivano da contaminazione
> per uranio impoverito (e metalli associati), ne' che dette affezioni
> sicuramente non derivano da uranio impoverito.
>
> Si resta insomma inevitabilmente nel campo delle probabilita', piu'
> o meno grandi, che e' emersa dall'analisi delle migliaia di casi
> verificatisi in Iraq tra la popolazione civile e nei reduci della
guerra
> del Golfo. Le decine di casi italiani non potranno certamente
> modificare queste valutazioni.
>
> D'altra parte tali valutazioni hanno fatto si' che gli Stati Uniti
> abbiano emanato fin dal 1993, in occasione dell'impiego delle
> truppe in Somalia, norme di sicurezza molto stringenti che
> mettevano in evidenza i rischi di tumori e malformazioni alla
> nascita, come e' stato ricordato anche recentemente dal
> settimanale tedesco «Der Spiegel» del 22 gennaio 2001 e prima
> anvcora da «Il Giornale dei Militari» del 27/11/2000. Del resto nel
> quotidianoo «San Francisco Examiner» del 21 giugno 1998 si
> legge che il regolamento militare USA di medicina preventiva (Art.
> 40-45) prevede che "vengano eseguiti dei test medici qualora si
> ritenga che materiali radioattivi siano stati impiegati in modo tale
da
> poter essere stati ingeriti, inalati o assorbiti all'interno del
corpo".
> Viene precisato inoltre: "Il Col. Cherry afferma che questo e' stato
> fatto in Somalia durante una missione di pace delle Nazioni Unite
> nel 1992 e che attualmente tale regolamento viene applicato in
> Corea, Bosnia e nel Golfo Persico".
>
> Da un punto di vista umanitario (rispecchiato anche nel recente
> diritto internazionale) occorreva quanto meno avvertire le
> popolazioni delle zone colpite dei rischi presenti anche dopo la
> cessazione delle azioni di fuoco e dopo il termine del conflitto.
>
> La conoscenza dei pericoli dell'uranio impoverito era ben nota alla
> sanita' militare internazionale nel quadro delle relazioni
interalleate.
> Si tratta di materia che e' perfino esposta nelle "sinossi" in uso
> presso le nostre scuole militari! Inoltre, l'argomento e' ben noto da
> tempo attraverso la pubblicistica, niente affatto segreta, come i
libri
> dell'ex ministro della giustizia USA, Ramsey Clark: "The fire this
> time" e "The metal of dishonour", quest'ultimo anche tradotto in
> italiano.
>
> Certamente quindi la questione dell'uranio impoverito non poteva
> essere sfuggita all'attenzione, oltreche' dei servizi di informazione
> italiani, anche dell'ambito sanitario-ambientale e degli addetti
militari
> italiani presso le ambasciate nei paesi in cui questo materiale
> veniva usato.
>
> Nelle norme di sicurezza emanate il 22 novembre 1999 nel quadro
> della forza multilaterale nei Balcani (a firma del colonnello Osvaldo
> Bizzari, specializzato NBC) il rischio e' presentificato in termini di
> possibilita' di contrazione di tumori e di malformazioni alla nascita.
> Purtroppo queste norme (che comunque non sono state diffuse tra
> i civili) non hanno riguardato, oltreche' i primi sei mesi della
> campagna in Kosovo, i periodi delle campagne in Somalia e in
> Bosnia. Inoltre i mezzi e le procedure da mettere in atto per ridurre
> il rischio non erano disponibili alla componente civile. Il problema
> sussiste anche nei poligoni di tiro dove forze alleate usano
> armamenti all'uranio impoverito.
>
> Su questo problema che riguarda il "milite ignaro" (ma anche il
> "civile ignaro") ritengo che debba essere portata l'attenzione delle
> superiori autorita' indipendentemente anche da quali possono
> essere le conclusioni delle commissioni medico-scientifiche.
>
> In particolare pare che ogni sforzo debba pertanto essere compiuto
> per accertare come sia stato possibile che una materia cosi'
> gravida di implicazioni, da una parte per i nostri civili e militari
> impiegati nelle zone di operazione e, dall'altra parte (e in primo
> luogo) per le popolazioni civili sia sfuggita all'attenzione dei
> Ministeri dela Difesa, dell'Interno, della Sanita', dell'Ambiente.
>
> Credo che l'opinione pubblica non debba essere lasciata all'oscuro
> di quanto avviene in determinate istituzioni come e' accaduto,
> limitandoci a vicende recenti, per quanto riguarda Ustica, le
> violenze in Somalia, il Cermis, il caso Scieri. Il pericolo e' che
> venga minata la credibilita' dello Stato e la trasparenza del suo
> agire, che costituisce un sine qua non per una democrazia.
>
> E' per questi motivi che lo scrivente riteneva che la convocazione
> del Consiglio Supremo di Difesa potesse costituire un segnale
> positivo in rapporto al fatto che di fronte alla morte e alle gravi
> patologie manifestatesi in numerosi militari si voglia operare nel
> senso della difesa del loro elementare diritto ad essere informati,
> preventivamente e durante le operazioni, mentre si ha l'impressione
> che vi siano soprattutto preoccupazioni per l'autodifesa delle
> istituzioni.
>
> Falco Accame
> presidente ANA-Vafaf
> e a nome della rete AUI
> ********************************************************************
>
> 2) Lettera al Presidente del Consiglio (punto 4 del programma)
>
> Roma, 23 gennaio 2001
>
> Al Presidente del Consiglio prof. Giuliano Amato
>
> Signor Presidente del Consiglio,
>
> faccio seguito alle lettere scritteLe in precedenza (vedi allegato)
> circa la questione dell'uranio impoverito e dei rischi corsi dal
nostro
> personale, civile e militare, prima in Somalia e poi in Bosnia e
> quanto meno 5 mesi nel Kosovo, in quanto non era stato informato
> della situazione e non erano stati assicurati i mezzi di protezione.
> (Il personale civile non e' mai stato dotato di mezzi di protezione,
> ne' gli sono state fornite istruzioni in merito).
>
> La problematica relativa a questa vicenda e' specificata in dettaglio
> nella lettera che ho scritto al Presidente della repubblica e che Le
> allego in copia.
>
> Nel frattempo si e' costituita la rete AUI (Aboliamo l'Uranio
> Impoverito). Anche a nome di questa rete Le chiedo un incontro in
> tempi brevi con una delegazione per esporLe alcuni dei problemi
> prioritari da affrontare.
>
> Falco Accame
>
> ***************************************************************
>
> 3) Lettere ai Presidenti di alcune Regioni dove si trovano i poligoni
di
> tiro (punto 5 del programma)
>
> REGIONE LAZIO
>
> Roma, 23 gennaio 2001
>
> Al Presidente della Regione Lazio
> On. Francesco Storace
>
> Signor Presidente
>
> nel poligono di tiro di Nettuno si sono svolte e si svolgono
> esercitazioni a cui partecipano mezzi con la presenza di uranio
> impoverito.
>
> Di recente sono emersi casi di patologie sospette in cui si rivela la
> possibilita' di inquinamento da detto materiale.
>
> Il Presidente della Regione Sarda, Mario Floris, ha chiesto un
> incontro (vedi allegato) con il Presidente del Consiglio e il Ministro
> della Difesa. Per quanto concerne i poligoni si rende necessario un
> monitoraggio dell'area con appositi mezzi che spesso eccedono le
> possibilita' dei nuclei NBC.
>
> La problematica riguardante l'uso di armi all'uranio impoverito e'
> esposta nella allegata lettera scritta al Presidente della Repubblica.
>
> Anche a nome della Rete AUI (Aboliamo l'uranio impoverito!) Le
> chiediamo di intraprendere misure per verificare le condizioni di
> rischio eventualmente presenti nell'area e adottare le misure
> conseguenti.
>
> Falco Accame
>
>
> REGIONE CAMPANIA
>
> Roma, 23 gennaio 2001.
>
> Al Presidente della Regione Campania
> On. Antonio Bassolino
>
> Signor Presidente
>
> nel poligono di Persano si sono svolte e si svolgono esercitazioni a
> cui
> partecipano mezzi con la presenza di uranio impoverito.
>
> Di recente sono emersi casi di patologie sospette in cui si rivela la
> possibilita' di inquinamento da detto materiale.
>
> Il Presidente della Regione Sarda, Mario Floris, ha chiesto un
> incontro (vedi allegato) con il Presidente del Consiglio e il Ministro
> della Difesa. Per quanto concerne i poligoni si rende necessario un
> monitoraggio dell'area con appositi mezzi che spesso eccedono le
> possibilita' dei nuclei NBC.
>
> La problematica riguardante l'uso di armi all'uranio impoverito e'
> esposta nella allegata lettera scritta al Presidente della Repubblica.
>
> Anche a nome della Rete AUI (Aboliamo l'uranio impoverito!) Le
> chiediamo di intraprendere misure per verificare le condizioni di
> rischio eventualmente presenti nell'area e adottare le misure
> conseguenti.
>
> Falco Accame
>
> REGIONE FRIULI
>
> Roma, 23 gennaio 2001
>
> Al Presidente della Regione Friuli
> dott. Roberto Antonione
>
> Signor Presidente
>
> nei poligoni di tiro del Friuli si sono svolte e si svolgono
> esercitazioni a cui partecipano mezzi con la presenza di uranio
> impoverito.
>
> Di recente sono emersi casi di patologie sospette in cui si rivela la
> possibilita' di inquinamento da detto materiale.
>
> Il Presidente della Regione Sarda, Mario Floris, ha chiesto un
> incontro (vedi allegato) con il Presidente del Consiglio e il Ministro
> della Difesa. Per quanto concerne i poligoni si rende necessario un
> monitoraggio dell'area con appositi mezzi che spesso eccedono le
> possibilita' dei nuclei NBC.
>
> La problematica riguardante l'uso di armi all'uranio impoverito e'
> esposta nella allegata lettera scritta al Presidente della Repubblica.
>
> Anche a nome della Rete AUI (Aboliamo l'uranio impoverito!) Le
> chiediamo di intraprendere misure per verificare le condizioni di
> rischio eventualmente presenti nell'area e adottare le misure
> conseguenti.
>
> Falco Accame
>
> Notizie riguardanti i poligoni:
> 1. La procura di Bari avvia un'indagine sulle basi pugliesi (Il Tempo,
> 26 gennaio 2001) 2. La procura della Repubblica di Pordenone ha
> avviato un'inchiesta sul poligono del Dandolo (Maniago, Friuli) (Il
> Tempo 26/1) 3. Interrogazione del parlamentare della Lega Edouard
> Ballaman sul poligono del Dandolo in rapporto alla malattia di due
> militari (Medssaggero Veneto 24/1/01)
>
> °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
>
> 4) Convocazione di una manifestazione di protesta (punto 6 del
> programma)
>
> PORTIAMO UNA CORONA AL "MILITE IGNARO"
>
> Sabato 3 febbraio - ore 12
> Appuntamento a Roma, piazza Venezia
> davanti all'Altare della Patria - monumento al milite ignoto.
>
>
> UNA CORONA PER I MILITARI E I CIVILI VITTIME DELL'URANIO,
> INVIATI NEI BALCANI SENZA NESSUNA PROTEZIONE
>
> UNA CORONA ANCHE PER LE POPOLAZIONI COLPITE,
> NELL'IMMEDIATO E PER UN TEMPO INDEFINITO, DAGLI
> EFFETTI DI ARMI CHE LE CONVENZIONI ESISTENTI SONO GIA'
> SUFFICIENTI A BANDIRE
>
> Iraq (1991), Somalia (1993), Bosnia (1994-95), Jugoslavia (1999).
> L'utilizzo delle armi all'uranio configura un c r i m i n e c o n t r
o
> l' u m a n i t a'. Altro che operazioni umanitarie, guerre
chirurgiche,
> armi intelligenti! Hanno inaugurato invece la guerra nucleare di
> bassa intensita'. Bisogna impedire che possano continuare.
>
> Le morti per leucemia o affezioni simili di reduci dai Balcani hanno
> contribuito finalmente a squarciare la coltre del silenzio che ha
> circondato questi crimini per tanto tempo. Adesso non lasciamo
> sole le vittime. Non lasciamo impuniti i responsabili.
>
> Ministri e alti vertici militari sono stati colti in flagranti
> contraddizioni. Hanno ignorato a lungo quello che assolutamente
> non potevano e non dovevano ignorare. Hanno cambiato piu' volte
> versione, adattandola alle circostanze che via via emergevano.
> Hanno cercato e cercano di scaricare su altri le loro responsabilita'
> o di minimizzare i fatti.
>
>
> CHI E' COLPEVOLE DEVE PAGARE E DEVE INTANTO SUBITO
> ESSERE ALLONTANATO DAGLI INCARICHI CHE RICOPRE
>
> DEVONO ESSERE PRESE MISURE IMMEDIATE PER
> RISARCIRE E PER ASSISTERE DAL PUNTO DI VISTA
> SANITARIO SIA I MILITARI E I CIVILI ITALIANI, SIA LE
> POPOLAZIONI COLPITE.
>
> Coordinamento aboliamo l'uranio
> impoverito
>
> ATTENZIONE:
> chiediamo a tutte le associazioni di partecipare sabato 3 febbraio
> alle ore 12 a Roma (Altare della Patria) e a farsi portavoce
> dell'appuntamento. Comunicate rapidamente la vostra adesione e
> partecipazione all'indirizzo pasti@... oppure al fax 06
> 8174010. Grazie
>
> *********************************************************************
>
> 5) Controcommissione alternativa rispetto a quella istituita da
> Mattarella (punto 7 del programma)
>
> D'intesa con il Tribunale Clark, che ha tenuto la sua seduta il
> giorno 13 nel pomeriggio, dopo l'assemblea della Rete AUI,
> abbiamo verificato la disponibilita' di alcuni specialisti a
costituire
> detta commissione, la cui costituzione e' stata annunciata alla
> stampa e ripresa anche da alcuni giornali (per esempio il Manifesto
> del 20/1/01) il 19 gennaio nel corso della conferenza stampa del
> Tribunale tenuta al Senato con Ramsey Clark, ex ministro della
> giustizia USA e coautore del libro denuncia sull'iuranio impoverito,
> The Metal of dishonor.
>
> La possibilita' di visionare gli atti della Commissione istituita dal
> Ministero della Difesa (commissione Mandelli) e di affiancare con
> esperti di parte quelli gia' nominati, e' stata richiesta
ufficialmente
> al Ministro.
>
> Gli scienziati che hanno dato la loro disponibilita' sono stati
> contattati tramite Mauro Cristaldi del "Comitato scienziate e
> scienziati contro la guerra". Coloro che hanno dato finora la loro
> disponibilita' sono: Carlo Pona, fisico, Roma; Francesca Degrassi,
> mutagenista, Roma; Valerio Gennao, epidemiologo, Genova;
> Giorgio Cortellessa, fisico nucleare, Roma; Livio Giuliano,
> matematico, Roma; Paolo Manzelli, chimico, Firenze; Massimo
> Zucchetti, ingegnere nucleare, Torino; Alessandra Signorini;
> Angelo Baracca, Firenze; Fabrizio Fabbri, naturalista;Mauro
> Cristaldi, naturalista, Roma.
>
> Si tratta di persone altamente qualificate, dalla cui collaborazione
> ci aspettiamo molto. Molti di loro figurano tra gli oratori del
> convegno organizzato dalle scienziate e scienziati contro la guerra
> a Torino il 22-23 giugno 2000 (gli atti sono pubblicati nel libro
> Contro le Nuove Guerre, Odradek, 2000). Venerdi' 2 febbraio il
> Tribunale Clark ha convocato con loro e con gli avvocati che hanno
> dato la loro disponibilita' una prima riunione per coordinare
l'attivita'.
>
> Per quanto riguarda il prof. Massimo Zucchetti di Torino,
> segnaliamo una sua intervista su "Il Tempo" del 27/1/01.
>
>
**************************************************************************
> Vi chiediamo di tenerci aggiornati sulle vostre attivita' in rapporto
> all'uranio, in modo che si possa contribuire a far circolare le
> informazioni tramite e-mail o fax a tutte le associazioni che hanno
> formato la rete Abolire l'Uranio Impoverito
>
>
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Se vuoi sviluppare il tuo business, entra anche tu in
Consulteque.com, la piu grande community on line di
professionisti, dove l'offerta incontra la domanda delle imprese.
E poi potrai leggere le news, discutere con gli altri nel forum,
organizzare con noi i tuoi viaggi e molto altro ...
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1084757/www.consulteque.com
http://www.rferl.org/newsline/3-cee.html
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
Janiary 30, 2001
BELARUSIAN PRESIDENT BLASTS OSCE MISSION FOR EXCEEDING
MANDATE...
Alyaksandr Lukashenka said on Belarusian Television on
27 January that the OSCE Advisory and Monitoring Group
in Minsk is overstepping its mandate by creating a
"corps of 14,000-18,000 militants" who, under the
disguise of election observers, may become a threat to
the country's stability. Lukashenka noted that the
OSCE mission's mandate covers only assistance in
improving Belarusian legislation and monitoring of
developments in the country. He said, however, that
Belarus's electoral legislation has already been
improved to meet international standards and will not
be changed until this year's presidential elections.
Lukashenka claimed to have put the OSCE mission's
budget under his control and to have persuaded the
mission to give up its intention to form a legion of
paid "militants." JM
...PLEDGES TO WARD OFF 'YUGOSLAV SCENARIO' IN BELARUS
Lukashenka said he took a "tough stance" on the OSCE
mission following the opposition's and some Western
"observer's" promises to stage a "Yugoslav scenario"
in Belarus during the presidential elections this
fall. "No, there will be no Yugoslavia here. As long
as I am president, this will not happen... I will not
push you [Belarusians] to the barricades, I will go
ahead of you, I will defend my people," Lukashenka
promised, warning the television viewers that Belarus
may be bombed "from above with shells stuffed with
allegedly depleted uranium." JM
---
> The URL for this article is http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bor2.htm
>
> www.tenc.net
> [Emperor's Clothes]
>
> BORODIN FALSELY ARRESTED - WASHINGTON'S EXCUSE A LIE [1-30-2001]
>
> Note from Emperor's Clothes: Below is the relevant text from a Press
> Conference given by one of Pavel Borodin's lawyers, Genrikh Pavlovich
> Padva.
>
> Mr. Borodin was arrested Jan. 17 when he got off the plane at Kennedy
> Airport en route to the Bush Inauguration. He is a diplomat. He had
> been invited to this State event. The excuse that Borodin was avoiding
> questioning in Switzerland and that the U.S. had received a Swiss
> arrest warrant and had no choice but to arrest him is preposterous.
>
> Mr. Borodin requested a diplomatic visa from the U.S. Embassy in
> Moscow. According to the 'Washington Post' (Jan. 19th), this routine
> request produced "urgent" consultations between the United States
> Embassy in Moscow and the State Department. Why "urgent"? Because if
> the Embassy gave Mr. Borodin a diplomatic visa, then the State
> Department would have a harder time justifying Borodin's already
> planned arrest. The Embassy was instructed to stall: neither to issue
> the visa nor to urge him to stay away from the U.S. Mr. Borodin didn't
> want to miss his plane, so he left on a standard passport.
>
> An arrest complaint against Mr. Borodin was filed in New York on Jan.
> 17th - that is, after the 'urgent' discussion between Washington and
> the Embassy in Moscow. In other words, Borodin was setup for arrest.
> The State Department wanted him jailed. Mr. Borodin's New York
> attorney, Alexander Fishkin, commented:
>
> "The arrest warrant is issued on January 10th, he receives an
> invitation to the inauguration on January 13th and a complaint is
> filed in New York for his arrest on January 17th," he said. "It could
> be a coincidence, yes, but it looks too strange to be a coincidence."
> ('NY Times', 1-19-2001)
>
> Mr. Borodin is supposedly wanted by the Swiss authorities only for
> questioning. But Mr. Borodin's lawyers report that the Swiss,
> apparently under U.S. pressure, had previously rejected a Russian
> offer for Mr. Borodin to meet voluntarily with Swiss officials. The
> Swiss insisted on the extraordinary measure of extradition. This is
> called "Making your demand so extreme that the other side has to
> refuse." The US/Swiss claim that the arrest was necessary was
> literally invented.
>
> What is behind Mr. Borodin's arrest? I disagree with his lawyer, Mr.
> Pavda, who suggests that the arrest is aimed at discrediting the
> Yeltsin family. I think it is a provocation intended to intimidate the
> countries of the Former Soviet Union, and in particular to drive a
> wedge between Russia and Belarus, which is led by the independent
> (from Washington) President Alexander Lukashenko. Mr. Lukashenko is a
> current focus of demonization, stemming from Washington and parroted
> by the usual parrots, including some birds on the Left. He is
> authoritarian, he is crazy, and so on. Yes, crazy enough to resist
> Washington's neoliberal economic policies, with the result that
> working people in Belarus are a whole lot better off than in other
> parts of the Former Soviet Union. We need more crazy leaders like him.
>
> Some may wonder why we are devoting space to this relatively minor
> incident. The reason is, it is not a minor incident. It is an arrogant
> message, delivered by the United States Establishment to the
> politicians - and ordinary people - of the Former Soviet Union. The
> message says: We are the rulers; you are the ruled. It says: you are
> incapable of functioning in an honest, democratic fashion; we must
> control you and you must learn humility.
>
> How charming for Washington and Switzerland to offer a guiding hand to
> the backward Soviets! The Senior guide, of course, is Washington,
> which presently guides people directly or through proxies on every
> continent (via the KLA in Kosovo, the Ugandan and Rwandan armies in
> Congo, death squads and the regular Army in Colombia, grisly Islamist
> secessionists whom it sponsors in the Former Soviet Union, as well
> similar types in Algeria, Indonesia, etc.). The Junior guide is
> Switzerland, which usually avoids direct involvement in war; but then,
> to paraphrase Mr. Milton, they also guide who only stand aside, and
> profit.
>
> Pavel Borodin's arrest indicates that new adventures are planned, new
> attacks on the people of the former Soviet Union, now that Washington
> feels it has a reliable government installed in Belgrade. - Jared
> Israel.
>
> (Another article on this subject, 'Borodin Arrest Targets
> Russian-Belarus Union', can be read at
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/borodin.htm )
>
> On the Arrest of Pavel Borodin
> >From the Press Conference given by Genrikh Pavlovich Padva
>
> Official Kremlin Int'l News Broadcast
> January 26, 2001, Friday
>
> Moderator: Good day, dear journalists. Our guest today is Genrikh
> Pavlovich Padva who represents Pavel Borodin's interests. Today we
> will talk about the latest events in New York. Please, share your
> opinion with the journalists.
>
> Padva: First of all, I would like to apologize for being late, but I
> came straight from the courtroom, and you can't leave the courtroom
> until the hearings are over.
>
> There is nothing consoling in these events for us and for Pavel
> Pavlovich Borodin. Only one question was considered yesterday or
> rather today, it was night here -- the release of Borodin from under
> custody. Our side raised the question of releasing him on bail and
> guarantees basically from our state, because the guarantees were given
> by the Russian ambassador to the United States of America.
>
> Hearings lasted several hours, but no release was granted and Borodin
> remains in custody. I want you to understand one thing. For some
> reason there have been many media reports saying that the question of
> his extradition is to be considered. This is not so. The question of
> extradition will be considered later when the Swiss side provides all
> the necessary documents. It has 40 days of the date of detention to do
> so.
>
> The arrest that has taken place, just for you to have a clear idea,
> was necessary [supposedly] to secure Borodin's appearance for
> interrogation. It's not the arrest of the accused or even a suspect.
> It's what is called compulsory process.
>
> The arrest that was effected in America is called conditional arrest
> because the final decision is made not immediately, but later. So, the
> question of extradition, I repeat, will be decided when all the
> necessary documents are provided. We will oppose extradition as such
> when this question is considered. We will provide a large amount of
> data and documents to prove that he is not subject to extradition.
>
> What kind of data and documents are these? First of all, these
> documents will confirm our statement that Pavel Pavlovich has never
> been officially summoned anywhere. I mean Switzerland. The Swiss
> lawyer who is working on this with us is one of the leading lawyers in
> Switzerland. He is a professor and the author of a textbook by which
> all Swiss lawyers study criminal justice. He has specially checked out
> and talked with Mr. Deveau to find out whether Pavel Pavlovich had
> been summoned officially, but then failed to show up. No, nothing like
> this happened.
>
> It's all the more strange because they are trying to extradite him --
> this is an exact translation from English as a fugitive, which he is
> not. I'd say he was not a circumspect, what shall we call him, hunter
> -- well, no, a person who thoughtlessly pushed his way under this
> terrible wheel that was set in motion in Switzerland and that is still
> spinning. He did not escape from anywhere and he did not hide from
> anyone. He lived calmly. By the way, he has been abroad before, not in
> America, but in other countries.
>
> We will prove that it's strange when the question of coercive
> extradition is raised if the person never objected to meeting them
> voluntarily in the first place. Moreover, I am sure you know that our
> government told Swiss law-enforcement agencies, through the Russian
> ambassador in Switzerland, that if Switzerland did not insist on
> extradition, our state and our government would guarantee Pavel
> Pavlovich Borodin's voluntary appearance.
>
> However, they rejected this proposal, which, in my view, is a clear
> indication of bias because if they really want him to come to meet
> them, why extradite him by force? Indeed, in this case they will be
> able to meet him in many months at best because this is not such a
> simple procedure and not such a short procedure. If they want just to
> question him, it is easier to do with our government's guarantees. But
> unfortunately, they did not agree to this and insist on his
> extradition.
>
> I think it's some ambitions, of course. Maybe Mr. Deveau bears the
> grudge for something, perhaps, he thinks that he was not treated
> respectfully enough. Maybe, at least I've got the impression that
> these actions were not dictated by the necessity and are connected
> with some ambitions. I think that's all I can say right now. I am
> waiting for your questions and I'll try to answer them.
>
> Q: Today's Izvestia published an interview with Bertrand Bertossa in
> which he said that in addition to money laundering, the participation
> in some criminal group, excuse me, criminal organization, is
> incriminated to him. How can you comment on this statement?
>
> Padva: You know, it's hard to comment on all these statements, because
> we have not seen official charges. They have not presented either to
> Pavel Pavlovich or his lawyers. We only know that they have been
> published more or less officially and they are known to his lawyer who
> has been mentioned to me, lawyer Ponset (sp?) there in France, that is
> in Switzerland.
>
> Let's begin with money laundering. It's hard to comment because money
> laundering is understood as various actions involving property and
> money obtained illegally. But they don't say that -- they don't have
> proof, but they accuse him of having obtained this money illegally.
> They hoped all the time and said that this would be proved in Russia
> and then the transfer of money through Swiss banks would be recognized
> as money laundering.
>
> However, our thorough investigation -- there are 120 volumes in the
> Mabetex case which is connected with Pavel Pavlovich Borodin, but his
> guild has not been proven. Moreover, our investigation came to the
> conclusion that there is no his guilt in these actions, in contractual
> relations with Mabetex. So, it's not quite clear what money, the
> laundering of what money they are talking about.
>
> As to participation in a criminal group I believe they have the
> following in mind. They have found not one but many different
> accounts, a dozen, two dozen, opened in the names of citizens of ru
> and that are being ascribed to Pavel Pavlovich. Since the movement on
> some accounts coincided or were close, since some could have been from
> one and the same sources, this and only this gives them any reason to
> allege that there was some sort of a criminal group that laundered
> this money.
>
> I repeat that there is no data at all that all this money was gained
> by criminal ways not only by Pavel Pavlovich but also all the others.
> Unfortunately, we can comment only on what we know. But we know very
> little so far because, I repeat, no formal charges have been made
> anywhere.
>
> What does a charge of participation in a criminal group mean? As you
> understand, the charge must indicate what sort of a criminal group
> this was, what it engaged in, what crimes were perpetrated by this
> group of persons -- murdered, robbed, engaged in extortion, got bribes
> and so on. This is quite absurd. It is alleged that a group, say, of
> some 20 totally unrelated persons was accepting bribes or conducted
> joint theft. But nothing is known about the real charges. The only
> charge is participation in a criminal group. But this is really
> absurd. How can one defend oneself against such an allegation? It
> appears to us that this is quite a groundless allegation.
>
> I believe this is all that I can say about this.
>
> Q: Ekho Moskvy radio.
>
> Did the defense expect the decision taken by the court, or was it a
> surprise to you?
>
> Padva: It was an expected decision, of course. But the defense did not
> abandon hope that another decision was possible. It also did its best
> to prevent the decision that was taken from happening. But you know
> all the difficulties that we encounter.
>
> What is the situation? As I understand it, although some people are
> trying to say that this is a purely legal problem... formally,
> perhaps, it is a primarily legal problem. But what in reality have we
> come up against? Let us begin with the following. A couple of years
> ago America became the first country to demand greater transparency
> from Switzerland, its banks. America insisted that the fight against
> money laundering should be started. The American Jewish lobby raised
> the question that after the War, after nazism a tremendous amount of
> the money of victims of nazism had sedimented in Swiss banks. All this
> finally forced Switzerland to start doing something and, indeed, Swiss
> banks have become more open and have started demonstrating accounts,
> mostly Russian ones.
>
> You know very well what is now happening in the world. You know about
> the hysteria concerning the so-called Russian Mafia. You know very
> well about the allegations that Russia is not fighting money
> laundering and that for this reason Russia should be discriminated. In
> an election campaign speech Bush said that if elected, he will do
> everything possible not to give financial assistance to Russia because
> corruption and bribing is on such a grand scale there that all money
> winds up in the hands of our high-placed officials. And you know that
> he even named one of them -- a person as prominent as Chernomyrdin.
> This is the atmosphere in which Pavel Pavlovich Borodin was arrested.
>
> All this cannot but affect the solution of his case, his fate. Of
> course, a judge should proceed first and foremost from the law. But I
> am convinced that no matter how a judge proceeds from the law his
> ideology determines his understanding and interpretation of the law.
> Not directly, perhaps, but indirectly.
>
> We do not know how a judge voted, whether he voted for Bush or not. It
> is possible that he voted for Bush precisely because he said no
> financial help should be given to our corrupt society. This simply
> cannot but play a certain role in the solution of concrete questions,
> concrete cases.
>
> We took all this into account and we knew that we are facing
> substantial difficulties. Availing myself of the presence here of
> representatives of different media outlets I would like to say that it
> really disturbs me that there is a different approach to the fate of
> our citizens who are under investigation abroad and so on. The mass
> media is doing its best to protect Gusinsky and right it is. I fully
> agree with the press. If a person's guilt has not yet been
> established, if it is not yet really known whether or not a person has
> committed a crime, I am convinced that there is no need to keep such a
> person behind bars.
>
> But when we speak about Borodin some media outlets for some reason
> take already a totally different position as if he were not a citizen
> of our country, as if his arrest in these circumstances is not a slap
> in the face for our country. I do not understand this. I would want
> all the media outlets to keep to a single position, the position of
> protecting our citizens. By the way, this is a duty of our state.
> Sometimes I am asked: why is Borodin so defended? Because we should
> protect our citizens. And it is unfortunate that not all are being
> defended. This should be done because this is a constitutional duty of
> our state. It is a duty of our state to defend the interests of our
> citizens if these interests, if the rights of our citizens are
> encroached upon abroad. I believe that all this should be taken into
> account.
>
> As to what has concretely happened, you know everything. I do not know
> what else is there for me to explain to you. There was a court
> hearing. The pleas of the defense were heard out for three hours. This
> appears to be fair. The decision was taken not to release Borodin. But
> I cannot understand this decision. I do not understand why a person
> should be kept under guard when there is full confidence and a full
> guarantee that he will appear in court when summoned and will not
> disappear. There was this proposal to make him wear the electronic
> bracelet. You know, it will transmit information if he moves 100 or
> 150 meters. More than that, our ambassador offered his guarantee. This
> is unique. I do not know about other precedents. Plus a huge bail.
> Frankly, I don't know where this sum of 750,000 came from, apparently
> journalists wanted to raise that much, but the maximum sum that was
> considered was 250,000. However, mass media talked all the time about
> 750,000 for some reason. I think!
> they have been biased.
>
> Q: You say different media give different interpretations but he is
> our fellow citizens and he must be defended. But media say at least
> something, while Vladimir Putin has distanced himself from this. Do
> you follow me? What do you think the President's position?
>
> Padva: You know, I don't think the President is duty bound to make
> statements regarding the arrest of a citizen of his country. The
> President has not made public statements, he has not called a press
> conference and he has not made an official statement. But if the
> Foreign Minister is doing something, I don't think you have any doubts
> that this is being done with the President's consent.
>
> If our state says, through our ambassadors, that there are no reasons
> to keep him in custody and that if need be we can guarantee his
> appearance, this cannot be done without the President's consent. So, I
> don't think that the President has to make statements on each such
> case.
>
> The President is associated with our country. He is our guarantor, and
> I think that if he makes an appeal to some country and that country
> rejects it, it's a slap to all of us, every citizen of our country
> because this is our President, because we elected him, even though
> some may not have voted for him.
>
> This is why I think that the President should be very circumspect in
> making such statements in order not to lose his political face and,
> most importantly, avoid useless moves. I think that if there had been
> clear understanding that the President's statement or appeal would
> solve everything, he would have made it immediately.
>
> Q: You said that Russia provided guarantees of his appearance to
> Switzerland, but Switzerland rejected them. Was it done before
> Borodin's arrest or after?
>
> Padva: I think I made myself quite clear. No official request to
> Borodin or our government or Prosecutor General's Office regarding his
> appearance in Switzerland was ever made before his arrest. So, no one
> could guarantee anything or discuss anything. We gave such guarantees
> after his arrest.
>
> Q: Speaking juridically, does his arrest violate any law, maybe
> American or some other?
>
> Padva: Just formally?
>
> Q: Yes.
>
> Padva: No. Who speaks of a breach of law? Neither we nor our
> government have said that. There is an agreement on extradition
> between Switzerland and America. It obligates them to help each other
> in such cases. If one side requests the arrest of a person and his
> further extradition as provided for in this agreement, they have every
> right to do so and they must do so.
>
> Q: So, this talk of diplomatic passport -- everything is fine there?
>
> Padva: If he had official immunity, then this would be a different
> question. But Pavel Pavlovich does not have official immunity. At the
> same time, arresting a delegate who was basically sent officially on
> behalf of two countries, on behalf of a union of two countries, on the
> border is of course an unprecedented fact. I have never seen anything
> like that before.
>
> Voice: There was no official invitation.
>
> Q: Official? He arrived by regular passport.
>
> Voice: And by fake invitation.
>
> Padva: Wait a minute. Where did you get all this? I am shocked. You
> say this as if you saw all this with your eyes. The invitation was
> absolutely genuine and signed by a member of the presidential
> inauguration committee. I have to tell you that the State Department
> does not officially invite anyone except ambassadors who are
> accredited and live there.
>
> In keeping with the generally-accepted practice in America, such
> invitations are issued by private persons who have direct relation to
> events. I repeat, it was signed.
>
> I also know, although from media reports and not from official
> documents, that he allegedly didn't sign it, although we examined his
> signature. But this is a different question that has not been
> officially investigated or stated. He received an official document
> signed, I repeat, by an official because he was a member of two
> committees. It is more important that he was a member of an
> inauguration committee. Besides, he was a member of the Bush election
> sponsorship committee.
>
> Think of what was in this invitation, what is known to us and what is
> real and not a sham as you want to present it or as you were deceived
> about. It says that Pavel Pavlovich will be met upon arrival, that a
> room was booked for him in such and such place, that he will have a
> personal car, that he will take place in such and such events,
> absolutely official ones -- dinners, official breakfasts -- to which
> people are invited according to a list approved by a presidential
> adviser.
>
> This invitation was brought to the Foreign Ministry by Pavel Pavlovich
> and it did not evoke any doubts. It and his diplomatic passport were
> handed over to the US embassy which did not say that it was a private
> invitation that was invalid. This is why it's totally wrong to say
> that there was no invitation or that it was a false invitation.
>
> If it were a false invitation, perhaps this may be proved one day as a
> result of special investigation, and then the one who sent it will be
> brought to account, but what does Pavel Pavlovich Borodin to do with
> all this?
>
> As for his regular foreign travel passport, delegates who travel
> anywhere do not have to bear diplomatic passports. Diplomatic
> passports are issued only to certain officials. So the fact that he
> left the country and crossed the border by regular passport does not
> make him an unofficial person. Indeed, did he stop being the State
> Secretary of the Union State because of that?
>
> Q: Did he arrive in the US as a private person or as an official?
>
> Padva: What private person? He received an invitation and was sent
> there by the chairman of the Byelorussia-Russia Union, Mr. Lukashenko.
> How can he be a private person after this?
>
> Q: But America does not recognize this union, it hasn't recognized it
> yet, has it? It means nothing to it, do you understand this?
>
> Padva: Well, it does mean something to us. You asked me in what
> capacity he was sent there.
>
> Q: He could have been sent by the Pope, but what difference does it
> make?
>
> Padva: What did you say?
>
> Q: You accuse the States of disrespectful treatment. But on the other
> hand, you say that no law was broken by the arrest.
>
> Padva: That's right, no law was broken because they acted in
> accordance with their obligations under an agreement with Switzerland.
> You have to understand that -- I think I make myself clear enough,
> they were fulfilling their obligations under an agreement with
> Switzerland. In this sense the law was not violated. It was not
> violated because Pavel Pavlovich did not have a formal diplomatic
> immunity. That is why there was no formal violation. I am trying to
> say something else because you do not appear to understand simple
> things. What am I saying is that my experience, and I have been
> working as a defense lawyer for already 50 years, tells me that
> Borodin was officially sent there on an official invitation. This does
> not mean that he had immunity. I repeat, there was no formal violation
> of the law.
>
> But proceeding from my practice, my experience, I do not know of
> instances when an official delegate of such a high rank was detained
> immediately at the border. This is all that I wanted to say. Am I
> clear?
>
> Q: Radio Liberty. You said that there is a different attitude of the
> press to Gusinsky and Borodin...
>
> Padva: I said not of the entire press but of a certain part of it.
>
> Q: Why does this surprise you? Does it not seem to you that these
> persons have a different reputation?
>
> Padva: Because people are detained not on the basis of their
> reputation. And the press should not treat people differently. A
> citizen of Russia should have equal protection until he is found
> guilty and sentenced. Unfortunately, you want Borodin to be found
> guilty and Gusinsky not to be found guilty. As a citizen and a lawyer
> I want both of them to be regarded as equally innocent until their
> guilt is proved.
>
> Q: Your accusations against the press are unfounded. It is the task of
> the press to cover events. This has nothing to do with what we want or
> do not want to do. You are claiming that we are working for one side,
> defending one side.
>
> Padva: I am not speaking about you, I do not know who you are working
> for.
>
> Q: I work for Radio Liberty.
>
> Padva: You are working for somebody just as defense lawyers work for
> somebody. And you are committed to a no lesser extent than lawyers.
> But I would want the press to objectively cover events. As to my
> commitment, it is a natural and official one. I am defending precisely
> Borodin.
>
> As to you, you have no right to defend somebody just because you feel
> like it. You must inform people about objective circumstances. Well,
> objectively, so far neither Borodin or Gusinsky are guilty. And arrest
> equally should not be applied to them, in any case, in the existing
> concrete conditions.
>
> I am prepared jointly with Gusinsky's lawyers to defend his interests
> but I would also want those who rightly and fairly defend Gusinsky to
> give similar treatment to everybody else. Unfortunately, this is not
> what some media outlets are doing. I am not referring to the entire
> press. You know this saying that "Guilty conscience is speaking."
>
> Q: But it is absolutely wrong to blame everything on the press.
>
> Padva: Not on the press but on concrete representatives of the press.
>
> Q: Can you name the person who ... (inaudible) ... from the American
> side?
>
> Padva: Frankly, I do not remember the name.
>
> Q: What is going to happen now?
>
> Padva: Now Pavel Pavlovich is going to remain in prison. Our country,
> the state and mostly lawyers, Swiss, American and Russian lawyers,
> will submit additional data showing that we are right in our opinion
> that he should not be extradited.
>
> Q: And he is going to be kept in prison for so long?
>
> Padva: Yes. How else?
>
> Q: France Presse. Concerning the charge of belonging to a criminal
> group. You mentioned two dozen accounts that got money from a single
> source...
>
> Padva: You are speaking about two dozen accounts while I was speaking
> about two dozen persons.
>
> Q: Two dozen persons with accounts, right? Am I right in understanding
> that money to these accounts came from a single source?
>
> Padva: Wrong.
>
> Q: Can you give us the names of these people? If you can't can you at
> least say if there are any members of the Kremlin administration among
> them? What has happened with these accounts, have they been frozen?
>
> Padva: There is nothing to particularly conceal here since a lot has
> already been written in the press, though not always fairly.
>
> There is no doubt at all that one of Borodin's unofficial accusers is
> a certain Turover. I believe he claimed in one of the newspapers, I
> believe it was Segodnya, that when Borodin realizes that nobody needs
> him, that it is the Yeltsin family that is the target, then,
> supposedly, he will start talking and then there will be full clarity.
> Of course, everything began not with Borodin. Of course, the prime aim
> was to prove Yeltsin's guilt. There were certain circles and you know
> this very well that tried by all sorts of ways to turn our former
> President Yeltsin from a president into a defendant. All sorts of
> methods were used ranging from quite legal ones of the type of
> impeachment to the most illegal ones, attempts to discredit him. And
> one of these attempts were the allegations that he and his immediate
> surrounding, his family in the narrow and broad meanings of the word,
> possessed big dollar accounts in Switzerland. All this was directed
> against Boris Nikolayevich, directly or!
> indirectly.
>
> You mentioned the mass media. One of the first or actually the first
> newspapers to write about this was Corriera della Sera. Strange, but
> this newspaper turned out somehow to be the most informed one. It knew
> absolutely everything and was the first to raise this question in the
> press. And it repeatedly returned to this matter trying to persuade
> the public that all this is true.
>
> When it was established with absolute certainty that Boris
> Nikolayevich Yeltsin did not have and does not have dollar accounts,
> the accent was shifted to the Family. And there were attempts made to
> prove that Tatyana Dyachenko has money and so on. All this also ended
> in nothing. And it was just Pavel Pavlovich Borodin who remained face
> to face with the Swiss law enforcement machine. This is the soil out
> of which this case has grown. And since attempts were made to smear
> the so-called Family and since there were publications by one or two
> persons, I mentioned one of them to you, the Swiss authorities
> declared that Borodin is a member of a criminal group without saying
> what the crime actually was.
>
> You got me wrong that they all had accounts and got money from the
> same source. I did not say this. I said only that in certain
> instances, and please quote me correctly, do not ascribe to me things
> I do not say, well, in some instances the sources crossed one way or
> another. But this does not mean at all that some criminal group of a
> strange origin had existed.
>
> If you thing hard and strain your memory, you will remember that
> accounts may have the same or similar sources. Sometimes somebody
> hands over something to somebody else but this does not mean at all
> that this is a criminal group. For instance, somebody owes money and
> makes a transfer from his account to that of the other person. Does
> this mean that they are criminals? Absolutely not.
>
> So far Switzerland only has isolated bank transactions which they can
> interpret as they like. But nobody knows the truth yet.
>
> Q: Mir Novostei. A question to you as a jurist and not as a defense
> lawyer. A provocative question but my colleagues have also put it.
> When Borodin was arrested and since there are lots of high-placed
> foreigners staying in Russia and who have been involved in various
> scandals, and the FSB and the Foreign Intelligence Service have
> information about this, why did we just arrest them and look at what
> the reaction to this was going to be? Could this be done?
>
> And the second moment. Is it possible that this is some byzantine
> method of our secret services who for some reasons cannot arrest
> Borodin themselves and decided to do this with the help of others? But
> this is hardly the Prosecutor General's Office considering Mr.
> Ustinov's and especially Mr. Kolmogorov's good relations with Mr.
> Borodin. Do you think this is possible?
>
> Padva: I emphatically reject this even as a conjecture.
>
> Q: And what about my first question?
>
> Padva: My knowledge of the situation tells me that our special
> services had nothing to do with this concrete arrest. Although I do
> not regard our special services to be so impeccable and not capable of
> such things.
>
> Sorry, but what was your first question?
>
> Q: What about an arrest of foreign representatives?
>
> Padva: As you probably remember, Mr. Zhirinovsky said this almost
> immediately after this happened. I don't favor such actions. I think
> that if someone acts wrongly, this gives us no right to act wrongly as
> well.
>
> I remember there was a spy mania during the Cold War: you catch our
> spy, we will catch ten your spies. Then they catch 20 our spies in
> response and so on and so forth. Is this a civilized way of building
> relations with other countries? I think there are other ways to
> influence other countries to make them respect ours.
>
> ***
>
> A question from Emperor's Clothes: When has the United States
> government offered any indication that it responds to the "civilized
> way of building relations with other countries"?
>
> ***
>
> If you find Emperor's Clothes useful, we can sure use help.
>
> All our expenses are covered by individual donations. Any donation
> will help with our work.
>
> To make a donation, please mail a check to Emperor's Clothes at P.O.
> Box 610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321.
>
> Or call 617 916-1705 and we will take your credit card information
> over the phone. Thanks very much!
>
> www.tenc.net
> [EMPEROR'S CLOTHES]
>
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Se vuoi sviluppare il tuo business, entra anche tu in
Consulteque.com, la piu grande community on line di
professionisti, dove l'offerta incontra la domanda delle imprese.
E poi potrai leggere le news, discutere con gli altri nel forum,
organizzare con noi i tuoi viaggi e molto altro ...
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1084757/www.consulteque.com
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
Janiary 30, 2001
BELARUSIAN PRESIDENT BLASTS OSCE MISSION FOR EXCEEDING
MANDATE...
Alyaksandr Lukashenka said on Belarusian Television on
27 January that the OSCE Advisory and Monitoring Group
in Minsk is overstepping its mandate by creating a
"corps of 14,000-18,000 militants" who, under the
disguise of election observers, may become a threat to
the country's stability. Lukashenka noted that the
OSCE mission's mandate covers only assistance in
improving Belarusian legislation and monitoring of
developments in the country. He said, however, that
Belarus's electoral legislation has already been
improved to meet international standards and will not
be changed until this year's presidential elections.
Lukashenka claimed to have put the OSCE mission's
budget under his control and to have persuaded the
mission to give up its intention to form a legion of
paid "militants." JM
...PLEDGES TO WARD OFF 'YUGOSLAV SCENARIO' IN BELARUS
Lukashenka said he took a "tough stance" on the OSCE
mission following the opposition's and some Western
"observer's" promises to stage a "Yugoslav scenario"
in Belarus during the presidential elections this
fall. "No, there will be no Yugoslavia here. As long
as I am president, this will not happen... I will not
push you [Belarusians] to the barricades, I will go
ahead of you, I will defend my people," Lukashenka
promised, warning the television viewers that Belarus
may be bombed "from above with shells stuffed with
allegedly depleted uranium." JM
---
> The URL for this article is http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bor2.htm
>
> www.tenc.net
> [Emperor's Clothes]
>
> BORODIN FALSELY ARRESTED - WASHINGTON'S EXCUSE A LIE [1-30-2001]
>
> Note from Emperor's Clothes: Below is the relevant text from a Press
> Conference given by one of Pavel Borodin's lawyers, Genrikh Pavlovich
> Padva.
>
> Mr. Borodin was arrested Jan. 17 when he got off the plane at Kennedy
> Airport en route to the Bush Inauguration. He is a diplomat. He had
> been invited to this State event. The excuse that Borodin was avoiding
> questioning in Switzerland and that the U.S. had received a Swiss
> arrest warrant and had no choice but to arrest him is preposterous.
>
> Mr. Borodin requested a diplomatic visa from the U.S. Embassy in
> Moscow. According to the 'Washington Post' (Jan. 19th), this routine
> request produced "urgent" consultations between the United States
> Embassy in Moscow and the State Department. Why "urgent"? Because if
> the Embassy gave Mr. Borodin a diplomatic visa, then the State
> Department would have a harder time justifying Borodin's already
> planned arrest. The Embassy was instructed to stall: neither to issue
> the visa nor to urge him to stay away from the U.S. Mr. Borodin didn't
> want to miss his plane, so he left on a standard passport.
>
> An arrest complaint against Mr. Borodin was filed in New York on Jan.
> 17th - that is, after the 'urgent' discussion between Washington and
> the Embassy in Moscow. In other words, Borodin was setup for arrest.
> The State Department wanted him jailed. Mr. Borodin's New York
> attorney, Alexander Fishkin, commented:
>
> "The arrest warrant is issued on January 10th, he receives an
> invitation to the inauguration on January 13th and a complaint is
> filed in New York for his arrest on January 17th," he said. "It could
> be a coincidence, yes, but it looks too strange to be a coincidence."
> ('NY Times', 1-19-2001)
>
> Mr. Borodin is supposedly wanted by the Swiss authorities only for
> questioning. But Mr. Borodin's lawyers report that the Swiss,
> apparently under U.S. pressure, had previously rejected a Russian
> offer for Mr. Borodin to meet voluntarily with Swiss officials. The
> Swiss insisted on the extraordinary measure of extradition. This is
> called "Making your demand so extreme that the other side has to
> refuse." The US/Swiss claim that the arrest was necessary was
> literally invented.
>
> What is behind Mr. Borodin's arrest? I disagree with his lawyer, Mr.
> Pavda, who suggests that the arrest is aimed at discrediting the
> Yeltsin family. I think it is a provocation intended to intimidate the
> countries of the Former Soviet Union, and in particular to drive a
> wedge between Russia and Belarus, which is led by the independent
> (from Washington) President Alexander Lukashenko. Mr. Lukashenko is a
> current focus of demonization, stemming from Washington and parroted
> by the usual parrots, including some birds on the Left. He is
> authoritarian, he is crazy, and so on. Yes, crazy enough to resist
> Washington's neoliberal economic policies, with the result that
> working people in Belarus are a whole lot better off than in other
> parts of the Former Soviet Union. We need more crazy leaders like him.
>
> Some may wonder why we are devoting space to this relatively minor
> incident. The reason is, it is not a minor incident. It is an arrogant
> message, delivered by the United States Establishment to the
> politicians - and ordinary people - of the Former Soviet Union. The
> message says: We are the rulers; you are the ruled. It says: you are
> incapable of functioning in an honest, democratic fashion; we must
> control you and you must learn humility.
>
> How charming for Washington and Switzerland to offer a guiding hand to
> the backward Soviets! The Senior guide, of course, is Washington,
> which presently guides people directly or through proxies on every
> continent (via the KLA in Kosovo, the Ugandan and Rwandan armies in
> Congo, death squads and the regular Army in Colombia, grisly Islamist
> secessionists whom it sponsors in the Former Soviet Union, as well
> similar types in Algeria, Indonesia, etc.). The Junior guide is
> Switzerland, which usually avoids direct involvement in war; but then,
> to paraphrase Mr. Milton, they also guide who only stand aside, and
> profit.
>
> Pavel Borodin's arrest indicates that new adventures are planned, new
> attacks on the people of the former Soviet Union, now that Washington
> feels it has a reliable government installed in Belgrade. - Jared
> Israel.
>
> (Another article on this subject, 'Borodin Arrest Targets
> Russian-Belarus Union', can be read at
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/borodin.htm )
>
> On the Arrest of Pavel Borodin
> >From the Press Conference given by Genrikh Pavlovich Padva
>
> Official Kremlin Int'l News Broadcast
> January 26, 2001, Friday
>
> Moderator: Good day, dear journalists. Our guest today is Genrikh
> Pavlovich Padva who represents Pavel Borodin's interests. Today we
> will talk about the latest events in New York. Please, share your
> opinion with the journalists.
>
> Padva: First of all, I would like to apologize for being late, but I
> came straight from the courtroom, and you can't leave the courtroom
> until the hearings are over.
>
> There is nothing consoling in these events for us and for Pavel
> Pavlovich Borodin. Only one question was considered yesterday or
> rather today, it was night here -- the release of Borodin from under
> custody. Our side raised the question of releasing him on bail and
> guarantees basically from our state, because the guarantees were given
> by the Russian ambassador to the United States of America.
>
> Hearings lasted several hours, but no release was granted and Borodin
> remains in custody. I want you to understand one thing. For some
> reason there have been many media reports saying that the question of
> his extradition is to be considered. This is not so. The question of
> extradition will be considered later when the Swiss side provides all
> the necessary documents. It has 40 days of the date of detention to do
> so.
>
> The arrest that has taken place, just for you to have a clear idea,
> was necessary [supposedly] to secure Borodin's appearance for
> interrogation. It's not the arrest of the accused or even a suspect.
> It's what is called compulsory process.
>
> The arrest that was effected in America is called conditional arrest
> because the final decision is made not immediately, but later. So, the
> question of extradition, I repeat, will be decided when all the
> necessary documents are provided. We will oppose extradition as such
> when this question is considered. We will provide a large amount of
> data and documents to prove that he is not subject to extradition.
>
> What kind of data and documents are these? First of all, these
> documents will confirm our statement that Pavel Pavlovich has never
> been officially summoned anywhere. I mean Switzerland. The Swiss
> lawyer who is working on this with us is one of the leading lawyers in
> Switzerland. He is a professor and the author of a textbook by which
> all Swiss lawyers study criminal justice. He has specially checked out
> and talked with Mr. Deveau to find out whether Pavel Pavlovich had
> been summoned officially, but then failed to show up. No, nothing like
> this happened.
>
> It's all the more strange because they are trying to extradite him --
> this is an exact translation from English as a fugitive, which he is
> not. I'd say he was not a circumspect, what shall we call him, hunter
> -- well, no, a person who thoughtlessly pushed his way under this
> terrible wheel that was set in motion in Switzerland and that is still
> spinning. He did not escape from anywhere and he did not hide from
> anyone. He lived calmly. By the way, he has been abroad before, not in
> America, but in other countries.
>
> We will prove that it's strange when the question of coercive
> extradition is raised if the person never objected to meeting them
> voluntarily in the first place. Moreover, I am sure you know that our
> government told Swiss law-enforcement agencies, through the Russian
> ambassador in Switzerland, that if Switzerland did not insist on
> extradition, our state and our government would guarantee Pavel
> Pavlovich Borodin's voluntary appearance.
>
> However, they rejected this proposal, which, in my view, is a clear
> indication of bias because if they really want him to come to meet
> them, why extradite him by force? Indeed, in this case they will be
> able to meet him in many months at best because this is not such a
> simple procedure and not such a short procedure. If they want just to
> question him, it is easier to do with our government's guarantees. But
> unfortunately, they did not agree to this and insist on his
> extradition.
>
> I think it's some ambitions, of course. Maybe Mr. Deveau bears the
> grudge for something, perhaps, he thinks that he was not treated
> respectfully enough. Maybe, at least I've got the impression that
> these actions were not dictated by the necessity and are connected
> with some ambitions. I think that's all I can say right now. I am
> waiting for your questions and I'll try to answer them.
>
> Q: Today's Izvestia published an interview with Bertrand Bertossa in
> which he said that in addition to money laundering, the participation
> in some criminal group, excuse me, criminal organization, is
> incriminated to him. How can you comment on this statement?
>
> Padva: You know, it's hard to comment on all these statements, because
> we have not seen official charges. They have not presented either to
> Pavel Pavlovich or his lawyers. We only know that they have been
> published more or less officially and they are known to his lawyer who
> has been mentioned to me, lawyer Ponset (sp?) there in France, that is
> in Switzerland.
>
> Let's begin with money laundering. It's hard to comment because money
> laundering is understood as various actions involving property and
> money obtained illegally. But they don't say that -- they don't have
> proof, but they accuse him of having obtained this money illegally.
> They hoped all the time and said that this would be proved in Russia
> and then the transfer of money through Swiss banks would be recognized
> as money laundering.
>
> However, our thorough investigation -- there are 120 volumes in the
> Mabetex case which is connected with Pavel Pavlovich Borodin, but his
> guild has not been proven. Moreover, our investigation came to the
> conclusion that there is no his guilt in these actions, in contractual
> relations with Mabetex. So, it's not quite clear what money, the
> laundering of what money they are talking about.
>
> As to participation in a criminal group I believe they have the
> following in mind. They have found not one but many different
> accounts, a dozen, two dozen, opened in the names of citizens of ru
> and that are being ascribed to Pavel Pavlovich. Since the movement on
> some accounts coincided or were close, since some could have been from
> one and the same sources, this and only this gives them any reason to
> allege that there was some sort of a criminal group that laundered
> this money.
>
> I repeat that there is no data at all that all this money was gained
> by criminal ways not only by Pavel Pavlovich but also all the others.
> Unfortunately, we can comment only on what we know. But we know very
> little so far because, I repeat, no formal charges have been made
> anywhere.
>
> What does a charge of participation in a criminal group mean? As you
> understand, the charge must indicate what sort of a criminal group
> this was, what it engaged in, what crimes were perpetrated by this
> group of persons -- murdered, robbed, engaged in extortion, got bribes
> and so on. This is quite absurd. It is alleged that a group, say, of
> some 20 totally unrelated persons was accepting bribes or conducted
> joint theft. But nothing is known about the real charges. The only
> charge is participation in a criminal group. But this is really
> absurd. How can one defend oneself against such an allegation? It
> appears to us that this is quite a groundless allegation.
>
> I believe this is all that I can say about this.
>
> Q: Ekho Moskvy radio.
>
> Did the defense expect the decision taken by the court, or was it a
> surprise to you?
>
> Padva: It was an expected decision, of course. But the defense did not
> abandon hope that another decision was possible. It also did its best
> to prevent the decision that was taken from happening. But you know
> all the difficulties that we encounter.
>
> What is the situation? As I understand it, although some people are
> trying to say that this is a purely legal problem... formally,
> perhaps, it is a primarily legal problem. But what in reality have we
> come up against? Let us begin with the following. A couple of years
> ago America became the first country to demand greater transparency
> from Switzerland, its banks. America insisted that the fight against
> money laundering should be started. The American Jewish lobby raised
> the question that after the War, after nazism a tremendous amount of
> the money of victims of nazism had sedimented in Swiss banks. All this
> finally forced Switzerland to start doing something and, indeed, Swiss
> banks have become more open and have started demonstrating accounts,
> mostly Russian ones.
>
> You know very well what is now happening in the world. You know about
> the hysteria concerning the so-called Russian Mafia. You know very
> well about the allegations that Russia is not fighting money
> laundering and that for this reason Russia should be discriminated. In
> an election campaign speech Bush said that if elected, he will do
> everything possible not to give financial assistance to Russia because
> corruption and bribing is on such a grand scale there that all money
> winds up in the hands of our high-placed officials. And you know that
> he even named one of them -- a person as prominent as Chernomyrdin.
> This is the atmosphere in which Pavel Pavlovich Borodin was arrested.
>
> All this cannot but affect the solution of his case, his fate. Of
> course, a judge should proceed first and foremost from the law. But I
> am convinced that no matter how a judge proceeds from the law his
> ideology determines his understanding and interpretation of the law.
> Not directly, perhaps, but indirectly.
>
> We do not know how a judge voted, whether he voted for Bush or not. It
> is possible that he voted for Bush precisely because he said no
> financial help should be given to our corrupt society. This simply
> cannot but play a certain role in the solution of concrete questions,
> concrete cases.
>
> We took all this into account and we knew that we are facing
> substantial difficulties. Availing myself of the presence here of
> representatives of different media outlets I would like to say that it
> really disturbs me that there is a different approach to the fate of
> our citizens who are under investigation abroad and so on. The mass
> media is doing its best to protect Gusinsky and right it is. I fully
> agree with the press. If a person's guilt has not yet been
> established, if it is not yet really known whether or not a person has
> committed a crime, I am convinced that there is no need to keep such a
> person behind bars.
>
> But when we speak about Borodin some media outlets for some reason
> take already a totally different position as if he were not a citizen
> of our country, as if his arrest in these circumstances is not a slap
> in the face for our country. I do not understand this. I would want
> all the media outlets to keep to a single position, the position of
> protecting our citizens. By the way, this is a duty of our state.
> Sometimes I am asked: why is Borodin so defended? Because we should
> protect our citizens. And it is unfortunate that not all are being
> defended. This should be done because this is a constitutional duty of
> our state. It is a duty of our state to defend the interests of our
> citizens if these interests, if the rights of our citizens are
> encroached upon abroad. I believe that all this should be taken into
> account.
>
> As to what has concretely happened, you know everything. I do not know
> what else is there for me to explain to you. There was a court
> hearing. The pleas of the defense were heard out for three hours. This
> appears to be fair. The decision was taken not to release Borodin. But
> I cannot understand this decision. I do not understand why a person
> should be kept under guard when there is full confidence and a full
> guarantee that he will appear in court when summoned and will not
> disappear. There was this proposal to make him wear the electronic
> bracelet. You know, it will transmit information if he moves 100 or
> 150 meters. More than that, our ambassador offered his guarantee. This
> is unique. I do not know about other precedents. Plus a huge bail.
> Frankly, I don't know where this sum of 750,000 came from, apparently
> journalists wanted to raise that much, but the maximum sum that was
> considered was 250,000. However, mass media talked all the time about
> 750,000 for some reason. I think!
> they have been biased.
>
> Q: You say different media give different interpretations but he is
> our fellow citizens and he must be defended. But media say at least
> something, while Vladimir Putin has distanced himself from this. Do
> you follow me? What do you think the President's position?
>
> Padva: You know, I don't think the President is duty bound to make
> statements regarding the arrest of a citizen of his country. The
> President has not made public statements, he has not called a press
> conference and he has not made an official statement. But if the
> Foreign Minister is doing something, I don't think you have any doubts
> that this is being done with the President's consent.
>
> If our state says, through our ambassadors, that there are no reasons
> to keep him in custody and that if need be we can guarantee his
> appearance, this cannot be done without the President's consent. So, I
> don't think that the President has to make statements on each such
> case.
>
> The President is associated with our country. He is our guarantor, and
> I think that if he makes an appeal to some country and that country
> rejects it, it's a slap to all of us, every citizen of our country
> because this is our President, because we elected him, even though
> some may not have voted for him.
>
> This is why I think that the President should be very circumspect in
> making such statements in order not to lose his political face and,
> most importantly, avoid useless moves. I think that if there had been
> clear understanding that the President's statement or appeal would
> solve everything, he would have made it immediately.
>
> Q: You said that Russia provided guarantees of his appearance to
> Switzerland, but Switzerland rejected them. Was it done before
> Borodin's arrest or after?
>
> Padva: I think I made myself quite clear. No official request to
> Borodin or our government or Prosecutor General's Office regarding his
> appearance in Switzerland was ever made before his arrest. So, no one
> could guarantee anything or discuss anything. We gave such guarantees
> after his arrest.
>
> Q: Speaking juridically, does his arrest violate any law, maybe
> American or some other?
>
> Padva: Just formally?
>
> Q: Yes.
>
> Padva: No. Who speaks of a breach of law? Neither we nor our
> government have said that. There is an agreement on extradition
> between Switzerland and America. It obligates them to help each other
> in such cases. If one side requests the arrest of a person and his
> further extradition as provided for in this agreement, they have every
> right to do so and they must do so.
>
> Q: So, this talk of diplomatic passport -- everything is fine there?
>
> Padva: If he had official immunity, then this would be a different
> question. But Pavel Pavlovich does not have official immunity. At the
> same time, arresting a delegate who was basically sent officially on
> behalf of two countries, on behalf of a union of two countries, on the
> border is of course an unprecedented fact. I have never seen anything
> like that before.
>
> Voice: There was no official invitation.
>
> Q: Official? He arrived by regular passport.
>
> Voice: And by fake invitation.
>
> Padva: Wait a minute. Where did you get all this? I am shocked. You
> say this as if you saw all this with your eyes. The invitation was
> absolutely genuine and signed by a member of the presidential
> inauguration committee. I have to tell you that the State Department
> does not officially invite anyone except ambassadors who are
> accredited and live there.
>
> In keeping with the generally-accepted practice in America, such
> invitations are issued by private persons who have direct relation to
> events. I repeat, it was signed.
>
> I also know, although from media reports and not from official
> documents, that he allegedly didn't sign it, although we examined his
> signature. But this is a different question that has not been
> officially investigated or stated. He received an official document
> signed, I repeat, by an official because he was a member of two
> committees. It is more important that he was a member of an
> inauguration committee. Besides, he was a member of the Bush election
> sponsorship committee.
>
> Think of what was in this invitation, what is known to us and what is
> real and not a sham as you want to present it or as you were deceived
> about. It says that Pavel Pavlovich will be met upon arrival, that a
> room was booked for him in such and such place, that he will have a
> personal car, that he will take place in such and such events,
> absolutely official ones -- dinners, official breakfasts -- to which
> people are invited according to a list approved by a presidential
> adviser.
>
> This invitation was brought to the Foreign Ministry by Pavel Pavlovich
> and it did not evoke any doubts. It and his diplomatic passport were
> handed over to the US embassy which did not say that it was a private
> invitation that was invalid. This is why it's totally wrong to say
> that there was no invitation or that it was a false invitation.
>
> If it were a false invitation, perhaps this may be proved one day as a
> result of special investigation, and then the one who sent it will be
> brought to account, but what does Pavel Pavlovich Borodin to do with
> all this?
>
> As for his regular foreign travel passport, delegates who travel
> anywhere do not have to bear diplomatic passports. Diplomatic
> passports are issued only to certain officials. So the fact that he
> left the country and crossed the border by regular passport does not
> make him an unofficial person. Indeed, did he stop being the State
> Secretary of the Union State because of that?
>
> Q: Did he arrive in the US as a private person or as an official?
>
> Padva: What private person? He received an invitation and was sent
> there by the chairman of the Byelorussia-Russia Union, Mr. Lukashenko.
> How can he be a private person after this?
>
> Q: But America does not recognize this union, it hasn't recognized it
> yet, has it? It means nothing to it, do you understand this?
>
> Padva: Well, it does mean something to us. You asked me in what
> capacity he was sent there.
>
> Q: He could have been sent by the Pope, but what difference does it
> make?
>
> Padva: What did you say?
>
> Q: You accuse the States of disrespectful treatment. But on the other
> hand, you say that no law was broken by the arrest.
>
> Padva: That's right, no law was broken because they acted in
> accordance with their obligations under an agreement with Switzerland.
> You have to understand that -- I think I make myself clear enough,
> they were fulfilling their obligations under an agreement with
> Switzerland. In this sense the law was not violated. It was not
> violated because Pavel Pavlovich did not have a formal diplomatic
> immunity. That is why there was no formal violation. I am trying to
> say something else because you do not appear to understand simple
> things. What am I saying is that my experience, and I have been
> working as a defense lawyer for already 50 years, tells me that
> Borodin was officially sent there on an official invitation. This does
> not mean that he had immunity. I repeat, there was no formal violation
> of the law.
>
> But proceeding from my practice, my experience, I do not know of
> instances when an official delegate of such a high rank was detained
> immediately at the border. This is all that I wanted to say. Am I
> clear?
>
> Q: Radio Liberty. You said that there is a different attitude of the
> press to Gusinsky and Borodin...
>
> Padva: I said not of the entire press but of a certain part of it.
>
> Q: Why does this surprise you? Does it not seem to you that these
> persons have a different reputation?
>
> Padva: Because people are detained not on the basis of their
> reputation. And the press should not treat people differently. A
> citizen of Russia should have equal protection until he is found
> guilty and sentenced. Unfortunately, you want Borodin to be found
> guilty and Gusinsky not to be found guilty. As a citizen and a lawyer
> I want both of them to be regarded as equally innocent until their
> guilt is proved.
>
> Q: Your accusations against the press are unfounded. It is the task of
> the press to cover events. This has nothing to do with what we want or
> do not want to do. You are claiming that we are working for one side,
> defending one side.
>
> Padva: I am not speaking about you, I do not know who you are working
> for.
>
> Q: I work for Radio Liberty.
>
> Padva: You are working for somebody just as defense lawyers work for
> somebody. And you are committed to a no lesser extent than lawyers.
> But I would want the press to objectively cover events. As to my
> commitment, it is a natural and official one. I am defending precisely
> Borodin.
>
> As to you, you have no right to defend somebody just because you feel
> like it. You must inform people about objective circumstances. Well,
> objectively, so far neither Borodin or Gusinsky are guilty. And arrest
> equally should not be applied to them, in any case, in the existing
> concrete conditions.
>
> I am prepared jointly with Gusinsky's lawyers to defend his interests
> but I would also want those who rightly and fairly defend Gusinsky to
> give similar treatment to everybody else. Unfortunately, this is not
> what some media outlets are doing. I am not referring to the entire
> press. You know this saying that "Guilty conscience is speaking."
>
> Q: But it is absolutely wrong to blame everything on the press.
>
> Padva: Not on the press but on concrete representatives of the press.
>
> Q: Can you name the person who ... (inaudible) ... from the American
> side?
>
> Padva: Frankly, I do not remember the name.
>
> Q: What is going to happen now?
>
> Padva: Now Pavel Pavlovich is going to remain in prison. Our country,
> the state and mostly lawyers, Swiss, American and Russian lawyers,
> will submit additional data showing that we are right in our opinion
> that he should not be extradited.
>
> Q: And he is going to be kept in prison for so long?
>
> Padva: Yes. How else?
>
> Q: France Presse. Concerning the charge of belonging to a criminal
> group. You mentioned two dozen accounts that got money from a single
> source...
>
> Padva: You are speaking about two dozen accounts while I was speaking
> about two dozen persons.
>
> Q: Two dozen persons with accounts, right? Am I right in understanding
> that money to these accounts came from a single source?
>
> Padva: Wrong.
>
> Q: Can you give us the names of these people? If you can't can you at
> least say if there are any members of the Kremlin administration among
> them? What has happened with these accounts, have they been frozen?
>
> Padva: There is nothing to particularly conceal here since a lot has
> already been written in the press, though not always fairly.
>
> There is no doubt at all that one of Borodin's unofficial accusers is
> a certain Turover. I believe he claimed in one of the newspapers, I
> believe it was Segodnya, that when Borodin realizes that nobody needs
> him, that it is the Yeltsin family that is the target, then,
> supposedly, he will start talking and then there will be full clarity.
> Of course, everything began not with Borodin. Of course, the prime aim
> was to prove Yeltsin's guilt. There were certain circles and you know
> this very well that tried by all sorts of ways to turn our former
> President Yeltsin from a president into a defendant. All sorts of
> methods were used ranging from quite legal ones of the type of
> impeachment to the most illegal ones, attempts to discredit him. And
> one of these attempts were the allegations that he and his immediate
> surrounding, his family in the narrow and broad meanings of the word,
> possessed big dollar accounts in Switzerland. All this was directed
> against Boris Nikolayevich, directly or!
> indirectly.
>
> You mentioned the mass media. One of the first or actually the first
> newspapers to write about this was Corriera della Sera. Strange, but
> this newspaper turned out somehow to be the most informed one. It knew
> absolutely everything and was the first to raise this question in the
> press. And it repeatedly returned to this matter trying to persuade
> the public that all this is true.
>
> When it was established with absolute certainty that Boris
> Nikolayevich Yeltsin did not have and does not have dollar accounts,
> the accent was shifted to the Family. And there were attempts made to
> prove that Tatyana Dyachenko has money and so on. All this also ended
> in nothing. And it was just Pavel Pavlovich Borodin who remained face
> to face with the Swiss law enforcement machine. This is the soil out
> of which this case has grown. And since attempts were made to smear
> the so-called Family and since there were publications by one or two
> persons, I mentioned one of them to you, the Swiss authorities
> declared that Borodin is a member of a criminal group without saying
> what the crime actually was.
>
> You got me wrong that they all had accounts and got money from the
> same source. I did not say this. I said only that in certain
> instances, and please quote me correctly, do not ascribe to me things
> I do not say, well, in some instances the sources crossed one way or
> another. But this does not mean at all that some criminal group of a
> strange origin had existed.
>
> If you thing hard and strain your memory, you will remember that
> accounts may have the same or similar sources. Sometimes somebody
> hands over something to somebody else but this does not mean at all
> that this is a criminal group. For instance, somebody owes money and
> makes a transfer from his account to that of the other person. Does
> this mean that they are criminals? Absolutely not.
>
> So far Switzerland only has isolated bank transactions which they can
> interpret as they like. But nobody knows the truth yet.
>
> Q: Mir Novostei. A question to you as a jurist and not as a defense
> lawyer. A provocative question but my colleagues have also put it.
> When Borodin was arrested and since there are lots of high-placed
> foreigners staying in Russia and who have been involved in various
> scandals, and the FSB and the Foreign Intelligence Service have
> information about this, why did we just arrest them and look at what
> the reaction to this was going to be? Could this be done?
>
> And the second moment. Is it possible that this is some byzantine
> method of our secret services who for some reasons cannot arrest
> Borodin themselves and decided to do this with the help of others? But
> this is hardly the Prosecutor General's Office considering Mr.
> Ustinov's and especially Mr. Kolmogorov's good relations with Mr.
> Borodin. Do you think this is possible?
>
> Padva: I emphatically reject this even as a conjecture.
>
> Q: And what about my first question?
>
> Padva: My knowledge of the situation tells me that our special
> services had nothing to do with this concrete arrest. Although I do
> not regard our special services to be so impeccable and not capable of
> such things.
>
> Sorry, but what was your first question?
>
> Q: What about an arrest of foreign representatives?
>
> Padva: As you probably remember, Mr. Zhirinovsky said this almost
> immediately after this happened. I don't favor such actions. I think
> that if someone acts wrongly, this gives us no right to act wrongly as
> well.
>
> I remember there was a spy mania during the Cold War: you catch our
> spy, we will catch ten your spies. Then they catch 20 our spies in
> response and so on and so forth. Is this a civilized way of building
> relations with other countries? I think there are other ways to
> influence other countries to make them respect ours.
>
> ***
>
> A question from Emperor's Clothes: When has the United States
> government offered any indication that it responds to the "civilized
> way of building relations with other countries"?
>
> ***
>
> If you find Emperor's Clothes useful, we can sure use help.
>
> All our expenses are covered by individual donations. Any donation
> will help with our work.
>
> To make a donation, please mail a check to Emperor's Clothes at P.O.
> Box 610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321.
>
> Or call 617 916-1705 and we will take your credit card information
> over the phone. Thanks very much!
>
> www.tenc.net
> [EMPEROR'S CLOTHES]
>
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Se vuoi sviluppare il tuo business, entra anche tu in
Consulteque.com, la piu grande community on line di
professionisti, dove l'offerta incontra la domanda delle imprese.
E poi potrai leggere le news, discutere con gli altri nel forum,
organizzare con noi i tuoi viaggi e molto altro ...
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1084757/www.consulteque.com
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
[Note: Below is a joint statement by Michel Chossudovsky, Jared
Israel and Nico Varkevisser. The text that follows this statement
is by Jared Israel].
On the Arrest of Pavel Borodin
Last Wednesday (January 17th) Pavel Borodin, Secretary of the
Russian-Belarus Union, was arrested following his arrival by plane
in New York City. Mr. Borodin was in the U.S. on official State
business. He was an invited guest at President Bush's Inauguration
ceremonies. The official justification for arresting this Russian
diplomat is that the Swiss wanted to question him about alleged
kickbacks. But the real reason for his arrest, and his subsequent
imprisonment without bail, is that Mr. Borodin is Secretary of the
Russian-Belarus Union. There is ample evidence that Washington
fostered the breakup of the Soviet Union and has tried to undermine
political and economic links between the former Soviet Republics.
Just as Washington financed the Afghan terrorists during the 1980s
(this was done with the cooperation of Saudi Arabia, to the tune of
over $6 billion), U.S. foreign policy, open and covert, has been
behind several of the civil wars within the former Soviet Union
including the war in Chechnya. The outrageous incarceration without
bail of Mr. Borodin, when he had been invited to America by George.
W. Bush, is an obvious ploy to disable one of the key figures in
the Russian-Belarus Union and to pressure others in Russia and
Belarus to follow political and economic policies that are to
Washington's liking.
- Jared Israel, Michel Chossudovsky and Nico Varkevisser
Bush Gov't Attacks Russian-Belarus Union
by Jared Israel [1-23-2001]
Newspaper accounts of the arrest of Russian diplomat Pavel Borodin at
Kennedy Airport last Wednesday focus on charges of corruption. They
barely refer to the real issues - Washington's desire to a) punish Mr.
Borodin for encouraging close ties between Russia and a Belarus led by
the independent (of Washington) President Alexander Lukashenko and to b)
embarrass and destabilize Russia. The idea is, if the Russian government
does not distance itself from Borodin, the Western media can smear it as
corrupt. If they do desert Mr. Borodin, or if his arrest is downplayed,
this may discourage others from taking actions independent of
Washington. This is American diplomacy: about as subtle as an axe.
But the American media doesn't deal with these real purposes of the
arrest of Mr. Borodin. Instead the media either does not cover the story
at all, or talks about corruption. This is a wonderful thing. Pres. Bush
told Barbara Walters the other day ("20/20", Jan. 19th) that the world
needs to "raid out corruption", and I agree. But why try to start this
difficult "Raiding" process thousands of miles away? Wouldn't it make
sense to pioneer "corruption raiding" right at home? In the Barbara
Walters interview, didn't our new President say, in no uncertain terms,
that people in uncivilized countries need to "build a democracy under
our--under our image"? By "raiding corruption" right here, in the US of
A, wouldn't we be showing these backward types how it is done?
For example, just before leaving office in 1992, Mr. Bush's own father
granted the Barrick Gold Company (in Canada) the rights to a U.S. gold
mine worth $10,000,000,000 (billion). Barrick's cost: $10,000
(thousand).
"So can you guess what happened next? Right: George I then
joined Barrick's board of directors, where he pocketed big
money for the next seven years. And he didn't mind singing for
his supper either; Barrick frequently dispatched the
ex-president to meet with the bloodthirsty dictators who were
his "old friends," like Indonesia's Suharto and Zaire's Mobutu
Sese Seko, to rig up juicy backdoor deals for his corporate
masters.
"Perhaps not incidentally, Barrick poured $148,000 into George
II's campaign this year. And Daddy's dirty work as a bagman
and fixer for other corporate interests has also served l'il
Georgie well. For example, George I went to bat for the Mirage
Casino corporation when they wanted to muscle in on some
Argentina territory; this year, Mirage kicked back $449,000 to
GOP coffers. Daddy G also did some highly remunerative flack
work for Chevron Oil with his old friends in Kuwait; in
return, Chevron pumped $657,000 into the Republican tank in
2000." ('The St. Petersburg Times,' December 12, 2000)
Nevertheless Senior Bush was not arrested at the airport.
Three Things About the Arrest of Pavel Borodin
First , Mr. Borodin is a diplomat. Is the U.S. State Department familiar
with this term?
dip·lo·mat [díppl[(schwa)] màt ] (plural dip·lo·mats) noun
1. government representative abroad: a member or employee of a
government who represents his or her country in dealings with
other nations
2. tactful person: somebody who is tactful and good at dealing
with people
Arresting Mr. Borodin (after inviting him to the Inauguration, no less)
is not diplomatic and may be seen as a provocation by Russia and
Belarus. For starters it violates diplomatic procedure, arguably
international law as well. This is irrelevant of whether or not Mr.
Borodin was carrying his diplomatic credentials when arrested. This
arrest denies diplomacy and affirms the Law of the Bully. Did we need
more affirmations?
Second, it is beyond credibility that Borodin's invitation to the Ball
and his subsequent arrest were not coordinated actions. Mr. Fishkin,
Borodin's lawyer, commented:
'"The arrest warrant is issued on January 10th, he receives an
invitation to the inauguration on January 13th and a complaint
is filed in New York for his arrest on January 17th'" ('NY
Times', 1-19-2001)
Mr. Fishkin remarked to the 'NY Times' reporter that this appears to be
a setup. It does indeed.
Third, Mr. Borodin is the Secretary of the Russian-Belarus Union. The
Clinton administration has made clear its fury at Belarus, which has had
the temerity to resist neoliberal policies. Moreover, its government has
not bowed down to the usual Fifth Column "civil society" groups run by
Madeline Albright out of well-furnished offices at the National
Endowment for Democracy (sic!). The U.S. finds this both authoritarian
and anti-democratic.
The arrest of Borodin is the most sensational attack the U.S. has made
on the Russian-Belarus Union. It demonstrates the continuity of U.S.
foreign policy from Clinton to Bush. Having installed its puppet regime
in Yugoslavia, the U.S. Establishment is now escalating the attack on
the states of the former Soviet Union. Coming shortly after the death of
Laurent Kabila, President of the Congo, under circumstances that
strongly suggest U.S. involvement, this indicates a general escalation
of U.S. interventionism around the world.
In case the Russian and Belarus leaders failed to get the message
delivered via Borodin's arrest - that is to say, that they were being
publicly insulted by a bully, with the implicit dare: "Whatcha gonna do
about that, wimp?!" - in case they failed to get the message, George W.
was interviewed Friday by Barbara Walters on the ABC TV show '20/20'.
Junior Bush's apparent assignment was to rub Russia's face in the dirt.
I say 'apparent assignment' because he himself did not seem to be sure
about that or anything else in the interview but fortunately for the
diplomacy of the Free World, Walters was privy to the Humiliate-Russia
plan, so she helped him out. Held him up, one might say.
The exchange went as follows:
"WALTERS: How will your foreign policy be different from Bill
Clinton's?
"President-elect BUSH: We're going to make it clearer to
people that our nation is not going to be a--a nation of
nation builders. We'll be humble in our approach. We can't
have troops going into nations and say that we're going help
you. We're going to--we're going to--you're going to build a
democracy under our--under our image. But if you expect
capital to come into your country, you must make reforms. You
must make--raid out corruption. You must...
"WALTERS: Russia. You're talking about Russia?
"President-elect BUSH: Well, I'm talking about a lot of
countries.
"WALTERS: Do you consider Russia a friend or a threat?
"President-elect BUSH: I don't know yet. I hope--I hope Russia
is a friend. "
Note that when Walters cues Junior Bush, saying "Russia. You're talking
about Russia?" (which means "RUSSIA! YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT RUSSIA!
DAMMIT!!") George doesn't get it. So Walters prompts him further: "Do
you consider Russia a friend or a threat?"
Note also that Junior Bush, in the very process of attempting to
humiliate Russia (by having a corrupt, incoherent American deliver a
stern warning against...corruption!) sticks in the incongruous line,
"We'll be humble in our approach." Amazing coming from a fellow whose
handlers have just busted at the airport a Russian diplomat whom they
lured to said fellow's Inauguration.
This profession of humility reminds one of Mr. Bush's oft repeated
phrase, "I am going to be president of all the people, not just those
who voted for me." Apparently they teach Junior Bush these phrases, and
he repeats them, amiably enough, though as often happens with phrases
learned by rote, not necessarily at the correct times or with exactly
the right wording.
Junior Bush's inability to get things straight when he speaks in public
is apparently going to be sold to us during the next, painful, four
years as Charming Stupidity; thus is virtue fashioned from necessity.
The same sort of feat was performed with Slick Willie, whose tendency to
rub on any available leg, and to lie, was sold to us as Puppy Dog
Cuteness.
Stupidity is superior in many ways to Doggieness. For one thing, it
elicits the sympathy of reporters throughout the Western media, who are
forced to write nonsensical stupidity which insults their intelligence
or else lose their jobs. For another, it provides an excuse for almost
any occasion. When in doubt, more and more folks in the Bush entourage
will tell us, "Like, you know, I mean, like, I dunno." To be stupid is
the ultimate stonewall.
Team of Fools
Consider the case of Vincent Zenga, whom you may refer to as Vincent the
Dumb. Vincent was an official member of Junior Bush's Inauguration Team.
(Everything with Junior is a Team, for reasons that ought to be
apparent…) It was he who supposedly invited Pavel Borodin to the
Inaugural "candlelight dinner". That is, Vincent Zenga is supposedly the
reason Pavel Borodin got off that plane at Kennedy airport and thus
could be nabbed by our corruption-fighters.
Mr. Zenga is described in the 'NY Times' as:
"a lawyer from West Palm Beach, Fla., who has contributed
sizable sums to the Republican National Committee and to Mr.
Bush's 1998 campaign for governor. "
Have you noticed that everything with the Bush family involves lots of
money? Is this corruption-fighting thing some kind of psychological
projection?
Zenga denied any complicity in the arrest of Mr. Borodin. "Mr. Zenga
said the invitation was sent by someone in the Moscow office of one of
his companies, Star Capital, " said the 'Times.' (1-19)
In a 'Washington Post' interview, Vincent the Dumb took the line that
Borodin had been invited "inadvertently".
Huh? How do you invite someone 'inadvertently'? Here's the 'Washington
Post' again:
"Zenga said he was mystified about how a letter went out over
his signature inviting Borodin to several exclusive events and
promising not only tickets, but also 'a car with driver' and a
hotel room. The Jan. 13 letter, which advised Borodin to bring
his own black-tie formal clothing, included tickets to a
candlelight dinner for 2,000 attended by Bush last night, and
promised tickets to an inaugural ball Saturday night.
'I have no idea how it happened' said Zenga of the invitation.
'We were surprised at it too.' "
Then, rather incongruously, Vincent added: "We [were un]aware of his
legal problems." ('Washington Post', January 19, 2001)
If Borodin was invited by mistake, whatever that means, what is the
relevance of Zenga having been ''unaware '' of Borodin's "legal
problems"? Is Vincent trying to tell us that, had he known of the legal
difficulties of this man whom he neither knew nor invited to the Ball,
he would not have invited him? Did somebody at CIA screw up and give
this guy two contradictory cover stories? Or is he just trying to
emulate his Master?
Just by the by, how can everybody in an American company that does
business in Russia be unaware of Borodin's "legal problems"? Those
problems have been discussed at least 308 times on Western TV and
newspapers over the past year. (I counted) And if you add the very
important word "Belarus" to the search, you still find 119 stories. This
does not include news reports or commentaries in the Russian language
media.
How does a highly successful man with a telecommunications company in
Russia manage to unwittingly invite a well-known Russian leader to the
Inaugural ball without knowing he has been accused of corruption?
Here is a bit more information.
"A State Department official said Borodin entered the country
on a multiple-entry, combined tourist and business visa issued
in 1998 for a three-year period. He had applied for a
diplomatic visa in Moscow on Tuesday night, prompting the U.S.
Embassy there to send an urgent request for guidance to the
State Department. But there was not enough time to respond
before his departure, and so Borodin used his personal
passport and left his diplomatic passport behind, the State
Department official said. "('Washington Post', January 19,
2001)
Why did the U.S. Embassy have to send "an urgent request for guidance"
to the State Department? Obviously because they read the newspapers and
therefore knew there was a Swiss warrant out for Borodin's arrest and
wanted to know what they were supposed to do: give him a diplomatic visa
which would rule out arresting him at Kennedy Airport or not give him a
visa and risk an international incident.
Nowadays urgent requests can be delivered and answered almost
instantaneously. So the outgoing State Department officials certainly
had time to consult with Bush's handlers. (Of course that's a bit of a
moot point since it was of course Bush's handlers who arranged to send
Borodin the invitation luring him to the U.S. in the first place. But
then, they did that unwittingly. Right?)
Clearly if these exalted beings wished to avoid an insulting provocation
(and an apparent violation of international law - the arrest of a
diplomat invited to a State function, no less) they could have issued
Borodin a standard, diplomatic visa. Or they could have refused while
warning him that there was a warrant out for his arrest. That they did
neither suggests they were hoping Borodin would use his non-diplomatic
visa (they knew he had one because the U.S. Embassy had issued it to
him.)
Liars often talk too much. Note that the 'New York Times' reports that
"Officials in Washington said the United States was tipped off by
someone in Russia that Mr. Borodin was on a plane to New York." Given
that the Embassy had sent "an urgent request for guidance", why the
baloney about being "tipped off by someone" that Borodin was coming?
Note also that the Federal Judge in Brooklyn ordered Borodin held for a
week without bail. Why, if the United States were not trying to insult
and provoke Russia, did US officials insist the man be thrown in jail at
all ?
"In Brooklyn, one of Mr. Borodin's lawyers, Raymond A.
Levites, asked Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky of the United States
District Court to allow Mr. Borodin to stay at the residence
of the Russian consul general while his legal problems were
sorted out. He said the Russian ambassador to the United
States, Yuri V. Ushakov, had offered to ensure that Mr.
Borodin made his court appearances. " (NY Times, Jan. 19,
2001)
Turning down this more than reasonable request is not only an insult to
the Russian Ambassador (implying his word is no better than that of, let
us say, an American President); it is also a further insult to Russia
and Belarus. Note that as of this writing (Tuesday AM, wee hours) Mr.
Borodin remains in jail, though as of Saturday, Mr. Bush became our
leader.
Our leader? As my long-dead Yiddish grandma would have said, "Oy vey is
mir." That literally translates, "Oh woe is me." But it means something
like, "What a world."
Recently some factually challenged fan of the US-sponsored regime in
Belgrade wrote a piece arguing that Baby Bush is going to give the world
a whole new enlightened foreign policy. Sure he will. And I can get you
this great deal on a really nice Bridge in Brooklyn.
Junior Bush may not be able to string two words together in coherent
fashion but his handlers know how to get the job done. The world is
their gold mine. - JI
***
If you find emperors-clothes.com useful, we can sure use your help...
All our expenses are covered by individual donations. Any donation will
help with our work. To use our secure server, please click here or go to
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/howyour.htm.
Or you can mail a check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton,
MA 02461-0321.
Or call 617 916-1705. Thanks very much.
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consulteque.com e' il sito internet dove l'offerta dei
professionisti incontra la domanda delle imprese!
Seleziona on line i professionisti piu qualificati per
svolgere un'attivita di consulenza per la tua azienda.
Entra anche tu in consulteque.com e risparmia il tuo tempo.
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1083358/www.consulteque.com
[Emperor's Clothes]
[Note: Below is a joint statement by Michel Chossudovsky, Jared
Israel and Nico Varkevisser. The text that follows this statement
is by Jared Israel].
On the Arrest of Pavel Borodin
Last Wednesday (January 17th) Pavel Borodin, Secretary of the
Russian-Belarus Union, was arrested following his arrival by plane
in New York City. Mr. Borodin was in the U.S. on official State
business. He was an invited guest at President Bush's Inauguration
ceremonies. The official justification for arresting this Russian
diplomat is that the Swiss wanted to question him about alleged
kickbacks. But the real reason for his arrest, and his subsequent
imprisonment without bail, is that Mr. Borodin is Secretary of the
Russian-Belarus Union. There is ample evidence that Washington
fostered the breakup of the Soviet Union and has tried to undermine
political and economic links between the former Soviet Republics.
Just as Washington financed the Afghan terrorists during the 1980s
(this was done with the cooperation of Saudi Arabia, to the tune of
over $6 billion), U.S. foreign policy, open and covert, has been
behind several of the civil wars within the former Soviet Union
including the war in Chechnya. The outrageous incarceration without
bail of Mr. Borodin, when he had been invited to America by George.
W. Bush, is an obvious ploy to disable one of the key figures in
the Russian-Belarus Union and to pressure others in Russia and
Belarus to follow political and economic policies that are to
Washington's liking.
- Jared Israel, Michel Chossudovsky and Nico Varkevisser
Bush Gov't Attacks Russian-Belarus Union
by Jared Israel [1-23-2001]
Newspaper accounts of the arrest of Russian diplomat Pavel Borodin at
Kennedy Airport last Wednesday focus on charges of corruption. They
barely refer to the real issues - Washington's desire to a) punish Mr.
Borodin for encouraging close ties between Russia and a Belarus led by
the independent (of Washington) President Alexander Lukashenko and to b)
embarrass and destabilize Russia. The idea is, if the Russian government
does not distance itself from Borodin, the Western media can smear it as
corrupt. If they do desert Mr. Borodin, or if his arrest is downplayed,
this may discourage others from taking actions independent of
Washington. This is American diplomacy: about as subtle as an axe.
But the American media doesn't deal with these real purposes of the
arrest of Mr. Borodin. Instead the media either does not cover the story
at all, or talks about corruption. This is a wonderful thing. Pres. Bush
told Barbara Walters the other day ("20/20", Jan. 19th) that the world
needs to "raid out corruption", and I agree. But why try to start this
difficult "Raiding" process thousands of miles away? Wouldn't it make
sense to pioneer "corruption raiding" right at home? In the Barbara
Walters interview, didn't our new President say, in no uncertain terms,
that people in uncivilized countries need to "build a democracy under
our--under our image"? By "raiding corruption" right here, in the US of
A, wouldn't we be showing these backward types how it is done?
For example, just before leaving office in 1992, Mr. Bush's own father
granted the Barrick Gold Company (in Canada) the rights to a U.S. gold
mine worth $10,000,000,000 (billion). Barrick's cost: $10,000
(thousand).
"So can you guess what happened next? Right: George I then
joined Barrick's board of directors, where he pocketed big
money for the next seven years. And he didn't mind singing for
his supper either; Barrick frequently dispatched the
ex-president to meet with the bloodthirsty dictators who were
his "old friends," like Indonesia's Suharto and Zaire's Mobutu
Sese Seko, to rig up juicy backdoor deals for his corporate
masters.
"Perhaps not incidentally, Barrick poured $148,000 into George
II's campaign this year. And Daddy's dirty work as a bagman
and fixer for other corporate interests has also served l'il
Georgie well. For example, George I went to bat for the Mirage
Casino corporation when they wanted to muscle in on some
Argentina territory; this year, Mirage kicked back $449,000 to
GOP coffers. Daddy G also did some highly remunerative flack
work for Chevron Oil with his old friends in Kuwait; in
return, Chevron pumped $657,000 into the Republican tank in
2000." ('The St. Petersburg Times,' December 12, 2000)
Nevertheless Senior Bush was not arrested at the airport.
Three Things About the Arrest of Pavel Borodin
First , Mr. Borodin is a diplomat. Is the U.S. State Department familiar
with this term?
dip·lo·mat [díppl[(schwa)] màt ] (plural dip·lo·mats) noun
1. government representative abroad: a member or employee of a
government who represents his or her country in dealings with
other nations
2. tactful person: somebody who is tactful and good at dealing
with people
Arresting Mr. Borodin (after inviting him to the Inauguration, no less)
is not diplomatic and may be seen as a provocation by Russia and
Belarus. For starters it violates diplomatic procedure, arguably
international law as well. This is irrelevant of whether or not Mr.
Borodin was carrying his diplomatic credentials when arrested. This
arrest denies diplomacy and affirms the Law of the Bully. Did we need
more affirmations?
Second, it is beyond credibility that Borodin's invitation to the Ball
and his subsequent arrest were not coordinated actions. Mr. Fishkin,
Borodin's lawyer, commented:
'"The arrest warrant is issued on January 10th, he receives an
invitation to the inauguration on January 13th and a complaint
is filed in New York for his arrest on January 17th'" ('NY
Times', 1-19-2001)
Mr. Fishkin remarked to the 'NY Times' reporter that this appears to be
a setup. It does indeed.
Third, Mr. Borodin is the Secretary of the Russian-Belarus Union. The
Clinton administration has made clear its fury at Belarus, which has had
the temerity to resist neoliberal policies. Moreover, its government has
not bowed down to the usual Fifth Column "civil society" groups run by
Madeline Albright out of well-furnished offices at the National
Endowment for Democracy (sic!). The U.S. finds this both authoritarian
and anti-democratic.
The arrest of Borodin is the most sensational attack the U.S. has made
on the Russian-Belarus Union. It demonstrates the continuity of U.S.
foreign policy from Clinton to Bush. Having installed its puppet regime
in Yugoslavia, the U.S. Establishment is now escalating the attack on
the states of the former Soviet Union. Coming shortly after the death of
Laurent Kabila, President of the Congo, under circumstances that
strongly suggest U.S. involvement, this indicates a general escalation
of U.S. interventionism around the world.
In case the Russian and Belarus leaders failed to get the message
delivered via Borodin's arrest - that is to say, that they were being
publicly insulted by a bully, with the implicit dare: "Whatcha gonna do
about that, wimp?!" - in case they failed to get the message, George W.
was interviewed Friday by Barbara Walters on the ABC TV show '20/20'.
Junior Bush's apparent assignment was to rub Russia's face in the dirt.
I say 'apparent assignment' because he himself did not seem to be sure
about that or anything else in the interview but fortunately for the
diplomacy of the Free World, Walters was privy to the Humiliate-Russia
plan, so she helped him out. Held him up, one might say.
The exchange went as follows:
"WALTERS: How will your foreign policy be different from Bill
Clinton's?
"President-elect BUSH: We're going to make it clearer to
people that our nation is not going to be a--a nation of
nation builders. We'll be humble in our approach. We can't
have troops going into nations and say that we're going help
you. We're going to--we're going to--you're going to build a
democracy under our--under our image. But if you expect
capital to come into your country, you must make reforms. You
must make--raid out corruption. You must...
"WALTERS: Russia. You're talking about Russia?
"President-elect BUSH: Well, I'm talking about a lot of
countries.
"WALTERS: Do you consider Russia a friend or a threat?
"President-elect BUSH: I don't know yet. I hope--I hope Russia
is a friend. "
Note that when Walters cues Junior Bush, saying "Russia. You're talking
about Russia?" (which means "RUSSIA! YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT RUSSIA!
DAMMIT!!") George doesn't get it. So Walters prompts him further: "Do
you consider Russia a friend or a threat?"
Note also that Junior Bush, in the very process of attempting to
humiliate Russia (by having a corrupt, incoherent American deliver a
stern warning against...corruption!) sticks in the incongruous line,
"We'll be humble in our approach." Amazing coming from a fellow whose
handlers have just busted at the airport a Russian diplomat whom they
lured to said fellow's Inauguration.
This profession of humility reminds one of Mr. Bush's oft repeated
phrase, "I am going to be president of all the people, not just those
who voted for me." Apparently they teach Junior Bush these phrases, and
he repeats them, amiably enough, though as often happens with phrases
learned by rote, not necessarily at the correct times or with exactly
the right wording.
Junior Bush's inability to get things straight when he speaks in public
is apparently going to be sold to us during the next, painful, four
years as Charming Stupidity; thus is virtue fashioned from necessity.
The same sort of feat was performed with Slick Willie, whose tendency to
rub on any available leg, and to lie, was sold to us as Puppy Dog
Cuteness.
Stupidity is superior in many ways to Doggieness. For one thing, it
elicits the sympathy of reporters throughout the Western media, who are
forced to write nonsensical stupidity which insults their intelligence
or else lose their jobs. For another, it provides an excuse for almost
any occasion. When in doubt, more and more folks in the Bush entourage
will tell us, "Like, you know, I mean, like, I dunno." To be stupid is
the ultimate stonewall.
Team of Fools
Consider the case of Vincent Zenga, whom you may refer to as Vincent the
Dumb. Vincent was an official member of Junior Bush's Inauguration Team.
(Everything with Junior is a Team, for reasons that ought to be
apparent…) It was he who supposedly invited Pavel Borodin to the
Inaugural "candlelight dinner". That is, Vincent Zenga is supposedly the
reason Pavel Borodin got off that plane at Kennedy airport and thus
could be nabbed by our corruption-fighters.
Mr. Zenga is described in the 'NY Times' as:
"a lawyer from West Palm Beach, Fla., who has contributed
sizable sums to the Republican National Committee and to Mr.
Bush's 1998 campaign for governor. "
Have you noticed that everything with the Bush family involves lots of
money? Is this corruption-fighting thing some kind of psychological
projection?
Zenga denied any complicity in the arrest of Mr. Borodin. "Mr. Zenga
said the invitation was sent by someone in the Moscow office of one of
his companies, Star Capital, " said the 'Times.' (1-19)
In a 'Washington Post' interview, Vincent the Dumb took the line that
Borodin had been invited "inadvertently".
Huh? How do you invite someone 'inadvertently'? Here's the 'Washington
Post' again:
"Zenga said he was mystified about how a letter went out over
his signature inviting Borodin to several exclusive events and
promising not only tickets, but also 'a car with driver' and a
hotel room. The Jan. 13 letter, which advised Borodin to bring
his own black-tie formal clothing, included tickets to a
candlelight dinner for 2,000 attended by Bush last night, and
promised tickets to an inaugural ball Saturday night.
'I have no idea how it happened' said Zenga of the invitation.
'We were surprised at it too.' "
Then, rather incongruously, Vincent added: "We [were un]aware of his
legal problems." ('Washington Post', January 19, 2001)
If Borodin was invited by mistake, whatever that means, what is the
relevance of Zenga having been ''unaware '' of Borodin's "legal
problems"? Is Vincent trying to tell us that, had he known of the legal
difficulties of this man whom he neither knew nor invited to the Ball,
he would not have invited him? Did somebody at CIA screw up and give
this guy two contradictory cover stories? Or is he just trying to
emulate his Master?
Just by the by, how can everybody in an American company that does
business in Russia be unaware of Borodin's "legal problems"? Those
problems have been discussed at least 308 times on Western TV and
newspapers over the past year. (I counted) And if you add the very
important word "Belarus" to the search, you still find 119 stories. This
does not include news reports or commentaries in the Russian language
media.
How does a highly successful man with a telecommunications company in
Russia manage to unwittingly invite a well-known Russian leader to the
Inaugural ball without knowing he has been accused of corruption?
Here is a bit more information.
"A State Department official said Borodin entered the country
on a multiple-entry, combined tourist and business visa issued
in 1998 for a three-year period. He had applied for a
diplomatic visa in Moscow on Tuesday night, prompting the U.S.
Embassy there to send an urgent request for guidance to the
State Department. But there was not enough time to respond
before his departure, and so Borodin used his personal
passport and left his diplomatic passport behind, the State
Department official said. "('Washington Post', January 19,
2001)
Why did the U.S. Embassy have to send "an urgent request for guidance"
to the State Department? Obviously because they read the newspapers and
therefore knew there was a Swiss warrant out for Borodin's arrest and
wanted to know what they were supposed to do: give him a diplomatic visa
which would rule out arresting him at Kennedy Airport or not give him a
visa and risk an international incident.
Nowadays urgent requests can be delivered and answered almost
instantaneously. So the outgoing State Department officials certainly
had time to consult with Bush's handlers. (Of course that's a bit of a
moot point since it was of course Bush's handlers who arranged to send
Borodin the invitation luring him to the U.S. in the first place. But
then, they did that unwittingly. Right?)
Clearly if these exalted beings wished to avoid an insulting provocation
(and an apparent violation of international law - the arrest of a
diplomat invited to a State function, no less) they could have issued
Borodin a standard, diplomatic visa. Or they could have refused while
warning him that there was a warrant out for his arrest. That they did
neither suggests they were hoping Borodin would use his non-diplomatic
visa (they knew he had one because the U.S. Embassy had issued it to
him.)
Liars often talk too much. Note that the 'New York Times' reports that
"Officials in Washington said the United States was tipped off by
someone in Russia that Mr. Borodin was on a plane to New York." Given
that the Embassy had sent "an urgent request for guidance", why the
baloney about being "tipped off by someone" that Borodin was coming?
Note also that the Federal Judge in Brooklyn ordered Borodin held for a
week without bail. Why, if the United States were not trying to insult
and provoke Russia, did US officials insist the man be thrown in jail at
all ?
"In Brooklyn, one of Mr. Borodin's lawyers, Raymond A.
Levites, asked Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky of the United States
District Court to allow Mr. Borodin to stay at the residence
of the Russian consul general while his legal problems were
sorted out. He said the Russian ambassador to the United
States, Yuri V. Ushakov, had offered to ensure that Mr.
Borodin made his court appearances. " (NY Times, Jan. 19,
2001)
Turning down this more than reasonable request is not only an insult to
the Russian Ambassador (implying his word is no better than that of, let
us say, an American President); it is also a further insult to Russia
and Belarus. Note that as of this writing (Tuesday AM, wee hours) Mr.
Borodin remains in jail, though as of Saturday, Mr. Bush became our
leader.
Our leader? As my long-dead Yiddish grandma would have said, "Oy vey is
mir." That literally translates, "Oh woe is me." But it means something
like, "What a world."
Recently some factually challenged fan of the US-sponsored regime in
Belgrade wrote a piece arguing that Baby Bush is going to give the world
a whole new enlightened foreign policy. Sure he will. And I can get you
this great deal on a really nice Bridge in Brooklyn.
Junior Bush may not be able to string two words together in coherent
fashion but his handlers know how to get the job done. The world is
their gold mine. - JI
***
If you find emperors-clothes.com useful, we can sure use your help...
All our expenses are covered by individual donations. Any donation will
help with our work. To use our secure server, please click here or go to
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/howyour.htm.
Or you can mail a check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton,
MA 02461-0321.
Or call 617 916-1705. Thanks very much.
www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consulteque.com e' il sito internet dove l'offerta dei
professionisti incontra la domanda delle imprese!
Seleziona on line i professionisti piu qualificati per
svolgere un'attivita di consulenza per la tua azienda.
Entra anche tu in consulteque.com e risparmia il tuo tempo.
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1083358/www.consulteque.com
The Ottawa Citizen
January 30, 2001
Argument & Observation, Page A19
TRIBUNAL ON TRIAL, by. James Bissett
Carla Del Ponte, the Chief Prosecutor of The International Criminal
Tribunal
for Yugoslavia [ICTY] was in Belgrade on Tuesday of this week demanding
that
President Kostunica hand over Slobodan Milosovic so that he might stand
trial before her Tribunal in The Hague. NATO countries and the western
media
have been vocal in insisting that Milosovic be surrendered to the court.
It
will be difficult for the new democratic authorities in Yugoslavia to
refuse
to do so. Economic and financial help to rebuild what the NATO bombing
has
destroyed will undoubtedly be conditional on cooperation with the
Tribunal.
Moreover, there are many Serbs in addition to his political enemies who
would be happy to see the end of the man many believe responsible for
the
disasters that has overtaken Yugoslavia since 1990.
Nevertheless, it would appear that the President Kostunica has serious
misgivings about the independence and impartiality of the Hague
Tribunal. He
is not alone in this. From its inception there has been doubts about the
legitimacy of the Tribunal. It was not established by treaty or by the
General Assembly of the United Nations as would normally be required for
such a court. The Security Council alone established the Tribunal and
only
after heavy lobbying by the government of the United States. Whatever
the
legitimacy of the Tribunal, there is strong evidence to believe the
Tribunal
was established more to satisfy political goals than to bring war
criminals
to justice.
Certainly the performance of the Tribunal so far has displayed more of
the
characteristics of a medieval Star Chamber than an independent judicial
body. A number of those who have been secretly indicted by the Tribunal
have
been kidnapped by armed thugs and transported against their will to The
Hague to wait in detention for months or years for trial without benefit
of
bail. They are then required to face unknown and often hidden accusers
before a Tribunal that acts as both prosecutor and judge. There is no
jury.
If the prisoner confesses while in custody, the confession is presumed
to be
voluntary. The trial may even be held in secret.
The Tribunal had a firm policy not to reveal the names of those on its
indictment list. Yet Louise Arbour, the former Chief Prosecutor violated
this policy when she publicly announced the indictment of Milosovic
during
the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. There seems little doubt the
announcement
was timed to bolster sagging public support for the bombing. After all,
who
would dare oppose the bombing of a country whose leader had been
indicted as
a war criminal? That Louise Arbour would violate the Tribunal's policy
is
not surprising. Her appointment to the Tribunal was conditional upon
receiving the approval of Madeline Albright.
It is also significant that the indictment against Milosovic did not
include crimes he might have committed during the Bosnian conflict but
was
confined to allegations about crimes in Kosovo. It would not do to have
the
man Madeline Albright hailed as, " a man of peace,"at the time of the
Dayton
Accords, indicted for crimes in Bosnia after he had played such a
pivotal
role in bringing about an end to the bloodshed there
. At the center of the indictment against Milosovic was the infamous
"Racic
Massacre,"alleging that Serbian security forces had murdered in cold
blood
forty-five Kosovo Albanian civilians. Madeline Albright has described
the
"Racac Massacre" as the galvanizing event leading to the air war against
Yugoslavia. However, the final report published last week by the Finnish
forensic experts who examined the bodies of the alleged victims confirms
what many suspected at the time- that there was no evidence to show the
bodies discovered in the shallow trench by United States general William
Walker were executed at close range. It seems the victims were armed
members
of the KLA who were killed in the fighting that had taken place in the
hills
above Racac the day before. Their bodies had been placed in the trench
to
simulate a massacre. This would suggest that at least some of the
evidence
against Milosovic presented by the United States to the Tribunal to
support
his indictment has been fabricated.
Article sixteen of the statute setting up the Tribunal stipulates that
the
Prosecutor," shall not receive instruction from any government or any
other
source." Yet the record of close cooperation between the Tribunal and
the
government of the United States suggests this article has not been
respected
by the Tribunal. Moreover although it is the United Nations that was to
finance the Tribunal it is in fact United States money that has enabled
the
Tribunal to carry out its operations, thus compromising any claim of
independence by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal has also been remarkably selective about who it has
indicted.
Almost all those so far indicted have been Serbs. To my knowledge no
Muslims
have yet been brought before the Tribunal. The notorious Naser Oric has
not
been indicted. He was the leader of the Muslim paramilitary forces in
Srebrenica who used this UN safe haven as a base to raid neighboring
Serbian
villages and butcher all of the elderly inhabitants who were unable to
flee.
Oric has openly boasted to journalists of these atrocities and they are
well
documented but nothing has been done. Oric is managing a bistro in Tuzla
numbering among his customer's UN peacekeepers.
Another individual well known to the Tribunal is Agim Ceku, an Albanian
from
Kosovo, who led the Croatian forces that in September, 1993 overran
Serbian
villages in the Medak pocket being protected by Canadian peace keepers.
After a firefight, the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry
retook
the villages only to find that dreadful atrocities had been committed
against Serbian civilians. Two years later Agim Ceku led Croatian forces
in
the infamous "Operation Storm," that "cleansed" Croatia of its entire
Serbian population. The Tribunal has not indicted Agim Ceku. On the
contrary, NATO has rewarded him by appointing him commander of the
Albanian
security forces in Kosovo.
The most serious charge against the War Crimes Tribunal has been its
adamant
refusal to indict NATO leaders for violating international law and the
United Nations Charter by waging aggressive war against a sovereign
state
without UN approval. Repeated demands by eminent lawyers from around the
world have been in vain. The Tribunal has refused to accept that the
bombing
of civilian targets, the employment of weapons containing depleted
uranium
and the use of cluster bombs was a crime.
There is no question that former Yugoslav President Milosovic should
face
trial. Nevertheless it is unfortunate that should he go to The Hague it
will
be seen as an endorsement of a Tribunal that represents everything an
independent international court should not be. It has been a Tribunal
dominated and paid for by its political masters. It has been a Tribunal
that
by any standard of measurement has been a travesty of justice. It has
been a
Tribunal that has sacrificed basic principals of law and due process to
act
as a willing tool for the achievement of US political goals and as an
apologist for NATO's political blunders in the Balkans. Let us hope that
the
new International Criminal Court that may soon come into existence can
do
better.
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consulteque.com e' il sito internet dove l'offerta dei
professionisti incontra la domanda delle imprese!
Seleziona on line i professionisti piu qualificati per
svolgere un'attivita di consulenza per la tua azienda.
Entra anche tu in consulteque.com e risparmia il tuo tempo.
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1083358/www.consulteque.com
January 30, 2001
Argument & Observation, Page A19
TRIBUNAL ON TRIAL, by. James Bissett
Carla Del Ponte, the Chief Prosecutor of The International Criminal
Tribunal
for Yugoslavia [ICTY] was in Belgrade on Tuesday of this week demanding
that
President Kostunica hand over Slobodan Milosovic so that he might stand
trial before her Tribunal in The Hague. NATO countries and the western
media
have been vocal in insisting that Milosovic be surrendered to the court.
It
will be difficult for the new democratic authorities in Yugoslavia to
refuse
to do so. Economic and financial help to rebuild what the NATO bombing
has
destroyed will undoubtedly be conditional on cooperation with the
Tribunal.
Moreover, there are many Serbs in addition to his political enemies who
would be happy to see the end of the man many believe responsible for
the
disasters that has overtaken Yugoslavia since 1990.
Nevertheless, it would appear that the President Kostunica has serious
misgivings about the independence and impartiality of the Hague
Tribunal. He
is not alone in this. From its inception there has been doubts about the
legitimacy of the Tribunal. It was not established by treaty or by the
General Assembly of the United Nations as would normally be required for
such a court. The Security Council alone established the Tribunal and
only
after heavy lobbying by the government of the United States. Whatever
the
legitimacy of the Tribunal, there is strong evidence to believe the
Tribunal
was established more to satisfy political goals than to bring war
criminals
to justice.
Certainly the performance of the Tribunal so far has displayed more of
the
characteristics of a medieval Star Chamber than an independent judicial
body. A number of those who have been secretly indicted by the Tribunal
have
been kidnapped by armed thugs and transported against their will to The
Hague to wait in detention for months or years for trial without benefit
of
bail. They are then required to face unknown and often hidden accusers
before a Tribunal that acts as both prosecutor and judge. There is no
jury.
If the prisoner confesses while in custody, the confession is presumed
to be
voluntary. The trial may even be held in secret.
The Tribunal had a firm policy not to reveal the names of those on its
indictment list. Yet Louise Arbour, the former Chief Prosecutor violated
this policy when she publicly announced the indictment of Milosovic
during
the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. There seems little doubt the
announcement
was timed to bolster sagging public support for the bombing. After all,
who
would dare oppose the bombing of a country whose leader had been
indicted as
a war criminal? That Louise Arbour would violate the Tribunal's policy
is
not surprising. Her appointment to the Tribunal was conditional upon
receiving the approval of Madeline Albright.
It is also significant that the indictment against Milosovic did not
include crimes he might have committed during the Bosnian conflict but
was
confined to allegations about crimes in Kosovo. It would not do to have
the
man Madeline Albright hailed as, " a man of peace,"at the time of the
Dayton
Accords, indicted for crimes in Bosnia after he had played such a
pivotal
role in bringing about an end to the bloodshed there
. At the center of the indictment against Milosovic was the infamous
"Racic
Massacre,"alleging that Serbian security forces had murdered in cold
blood
forty-five Kosovo Albanian civilians. Madeline Albright has described
the
"Racac Massacre" as the galvanizing event leading to the air war against
Yugoslavia. However, the final report published last week by the Finnish
forensic experts who examined the bodies of the alleged victims confirms
what many suspected at the time- that there was no evidence to show the
bodies discovered in the shallow trench by United States general William
Walker were executed at close range. It seems the victims were armed
members
of the KLA who were killed in the fighting that had taken place in the
hills
above Racac the day before. Their bodies had been placed in the trench
to
simulate a massacre. This would suggest that at least some of the
evidence
against Milosovic presented by the United States to the Tribunal to
support
his indictment has been fabricated.
Article sixteen of the statute setting up the Tribunal stipulates that
the
Prosecutor," shall not receive instruction from any government or any
other
source." Yet the record of close cooperation between the Tribunal and
the
government of the United States suggests this article has not been
respected
by the Tribunal. Moreover although it is the United Nations that was to
finance the Tribunal it is in fact United States money that has enabled
the
Tribunal to carry out its operations, thus compromising any claim of
independence by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal has also been remarkably selective about who it has
indicted.
Almost all those so far indicted have been Serbs. To my knowledge no
Muslims
have yet been brought before the Tribunal. The notorious Naser Oric has
not
been indicted. He was the leader of the Muslim paramilitary forces in
Srebrenica who used this UN safe haven as a base to raid neighboring
Serbian
villages and butcher all of the elderly inhabitants who were unable to
flee.
Oric has openly boasted to journalists of these atrocities and they are
well
documented but nothing has been done. Oric is managing a bistro in Tuzla
numbering among his customer's UN peacekeepers.
Another individual well known to the Tribunal is Agim Ceku, an Albanian
from
Kosovo, who led the Croatian forces that in September, 1993 overran
Serbian
villages in the Medak pocket being protected by Canadian peace keepers.
After a firefight, the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry
retook
the villages only to find that dreadful atrocities had been committed
against Serbian civilians. Two years later Agim Ceku led Croatian forces
in
the infamous "Operation Storm," that "cleansed" Croatia of its entire
Serbian population. The Tribunal has not indicted Agim Ceku. On the
contrary, NATO has rewarded him by appointing him commander of the
Albanian
security forces in Kosovo.
The most serious charge against the War Crimes Tribunal has been its
adamant
refusal to indict NATO leaders for violating international law and the
United Nations Charter by waging aggressive war against a sovereign
state
without UN approval. Repeated demands by eminent lawyers from around the
world have been in vain. The Tribunal has refused to accept that the
bombing
of civilian targets, the employment of weapons containing depleted
uranium
and the use of cluster bombs was a crime.
There is no question that former Yugoslav President Milosovic should
face
trial. Nevertheless it is unfortunate that should he go to The Hague it
will
be seen as an endorsement of a Tribunal that represents everything an
independent international court should not be. It has been a Tribunal
dominated and paid for by its political masters. It has been a Tribunal
that
by any standard of measurement has been a travesty of justice. It has
been a
Tribunal that has sacrificed basic principals of law and due process to
act
as a willing tool for the achievement of US political goals and as an
apologist for NATO's political blunders in the Balkans. Let us hope that
the
new International Criminal Court that may soon come into existence can
do
better.
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consulteque.com e' il sito internet dove l'offerta dei
professionisti incontra la domanda delle imprese!
Seleziona on line i professionisti piu qualificati per
svolgere un'attivita di consulenza per la tua azienda.
Entra anche tu in consulteque.com e risparmia il tuo tempo.
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1083358/www.consulteque.com
OTPOR "GHANDIANI" (COME PANNELLA) - ORGANIZZA LA CIA
Poiche' la nostra "sinistra" e la nostra "societa' civile" non ce lo
dicevano, siamo dovuti andare in India per sapere che sono state
"organizzazioni nongovernative statunitensi" ad addestrare la formazione
anticomunista jugoslava "Otpor" alla "rivoluzione democratica" dello
scorso ottobre, tramite corsi accelerati di "rivolta nonviolenta":
http://www.hindustantimes.com/nonfram/310101/detFOR09.asp
Hindustan Times
January 31, 2001
US NGO behind Gandhian revolt in Serbia
PTI
(Washington)
A UNITED States NGO trained non-violent volunteers for
the mass movement that overthrew Serb dictator
Slobodan Milosevic. The disclosure the US is also
accomplished in imparting non-violent training in the
overthrow of dictators is in an article in Peacewatch,
a publication of the Washington-based US Institute of
Peace.
The youth movement Otpor (Resistance), was a critical
participant in the October 5 revolt. Srdja Popovic, a
leader of Serbia's grassroots movement, said three
months of peaceful street demonstrations in Belgrade
against Milosevic in 1996-97, led by the political
opposition and the youth movement, marked the
beginning of the opposition’s non-violent strategy,
signalling to Milosevic and to his supporters that the
people no longer feared him.
Their disciplined defiance generated increasing
support among the populace. Over the last two years,
Popovic said, the opposition honed its understanding
and use of non-violent action, most recently with the
help of a retired US Army Colonel Robert Helvey, who
provided intensive training in non-violent principles
and strategy in March and April 1999.
The International Republican Institute, an NGO based
in Washington, which had been working to develop
political parties in Serbia, hired Helvey to do the
training. Helvey says he bases his training on the
concepts of Gene Sharp, author of Politics Of
Non-Violent Action, a three-volume opus on the
subject. The second volume lists 198 complete examples
of non-violent direct action techniques.
In his training, Helvey covers the source of power in
a society, their strengths and weaknesses, then has
participants define their own objectives and develop a
strategic plan for reaching them. The training also
covers how to put an opponent in a situation where he
has no choice but to lose.
After the training, Otpor created a manual of
non-violent resistance techniques based on Sharp's
books and trained some 70,000 activists who, through a
variety of non-violent methods and actions, paved the
way for and helped to lead the October 5 revolt.
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Se vuoi sviluppare il tuo business, entra anche tu in
Consulteque.com, la piu grande community on line di
professionisti, dove l'offerta incontra la domanda delle imprese.
E poi potrai leggere le news, discutere con gli altri nel forum,
organizzare con noi i tuoi viaggi e molto altro ...
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1084757/www.consulteque.com
Poiche' la nostra "sinistra" e la nostra "societa' civile" non ce lo
dicevano, siamo dovuti andare in India per sapere che sono state
"organizzazioni nongovernative statunitensi" ad addestrare la formazione
anticomunista jugoslava "Otpor" alla "rivoluzione democratica" dello
scorso ottobre, tramite corsi accelerati di "rivolta nonviolenta":
http://www.hindustantimes.com/nonfram/310101/detFOR09.asp
Hindustan Times
January 31, 2001
US NGO behind Gandhian revolt in Serbia
PTI
(Washington)
A UNITED States NGO trained non-violent volunteers for
the mass movement that overthrew Serb dictator
Slobodan Milosevic. The disclosure the US is also
accomplished in imparting non-violent training in the
overthrow of dictators is in an article in Peacewatch,
a publication of the Washington-based US Institute of
Peace.
The youth movement Otpor (Resistance), was a critical
participant in the October 5 revolt. Srdja Popovic, a
leader of Serbia's grassroots movement, said three
months of peaceful street demonstrations in Belgrade
against Milosevic in 1996-97, led by the political
opposition and the youth movement, marked the
beginning of the opposition’s non-violent strategy,
signalling to Milosevic and to his supporters that the
people no longer feared him.
Their disciplined defiance generated increasing
support among the populace. Over the last two years,
Popovic said, the opposition honed its understanding
and use of non-violent action, most recently with the
help of a retired US Army Colonel Robert Helvey, who
provided intensive training in non-violent principles
and strategy in March and April 1999.
The International Republican Institute, an NGO based
in Washington, which had been working to develop
political parties in Serbia, hired Helvey to do the
training. Helvey says he bases his training on the
concepts of Gene Sharp, author of Politics Of
Non-Violent Action, a three-volume opus on the
subject. The second volume lists 198 complete examples
of non-violent direct action techniques.
In his training, Helvey covers the source of power in
a society, their strengths and weaknesses, then has
participants define their own objectives and develop a
strategic plan for reaching them. The training also
covers how to put an opponent in a situation where he
has no choice but to lose.
After the training, Otpor created a manual of
non-violent resistance techniques based on Sharp's
books and trained some 70,000 activists who, through a
variety of non-violent methods and actions, paved the
way for and helped to lead the October 5 revolt.
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Se vuoi sviluppare il tuo business, entra anche tu in
Consulteque.com, la piu grande community on line di
professionisti, dove l'offerta incontra la domanda delle imprese.
E poi potrai leggere le news, discutere con gli altri nel forum,
organizzare con noi i tuoi viaggi e molto altro ...
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1084757/www.consulteque.com
sul du: un libro portoghese; cancro a kossovska mitrovica; tumori nei
pressi dei poligoni nato in bosnia.
sulla guerra chimica: nafta a novi sad.
politica: montenegro per l'indipendenza?; polizia pronta contro l'ucpmb.
economia: cambio valuta.
alberto tarozzi.
1. FONTE: tanjug
2.TITOLO: Libro sui segreti delle munizioni usate in Kosovo.
3.AUTORE :l'Agenzia"Tanjug".
4.SITO INTERNET: http://vesti.freeb92.net/press-index.phtml"
5. NUMERO DI PAGINE: !.
6.DATA: 28.01.2001- Le notizie per il 27.01.2001.
In questi giorni è stato pubblicato il libro"L'Uranio depleto- la
guerra
invisibile"in Portugalo-rende
noto l'agenzia jugoslava "Tanjug".Gli autori del libro Martin Mesonie,
Frederica Lur e Rodzer
Trilingue sostengono che la munizione usata nella guerra nel Golfo, nei
Balcani e nel Kosovo,
è fatta di materiale che è un miscuglio pericoloso di scarti nucleari.
Loro
affermano che nei comandi delle truppe americane è stato confermato che
oltre all'uranio
impoverito nella lavorazione delle munizioni sparate nel Golfo, nei
Balcani e nel Kosovo è stato usato il molto più pericoloso -il
plutonio..Loro citano il fatto che lo Stato Maggiore americano
nel Kosovo ha ritirato alcuni contingenti delle truppe dalla zona
contaminata perchè c'è
pericolo sulla salute dei militari.Tutto questo come una conferma che
nella
zone colpite ci sono
ancora le conseguenze dalla radioattività.
1.FONTE: FR VESTI.
2.TITOLO: E ' possibile aspettarsi un aumento del cancro.
3. INDICE: Secondo le affermazioni dei medici della regione di Kosovska
Mitrovica.
4. SITO INTERNET:
http://www.frvesti.com/vest.asp?t=79513&s=dnevnik.gif&e=
5.NUMERO DI PAGINE: ½.
6:DATA: 25.01.2001.
L'aumento notevole del numero delle persone ammalate di cancro nell'anno
scorso rispetto all'anno precedente, indica che è molto probabile un
boom
delle malattie cancerogene
nella regione di Kosovska Mitrovica."Solo nell'anno scorso nel Centro
sanitario a Kosovska Mitrovica sono state curate 158 persone che
rispetto
all'anno 1998, quando erano solo 68 persone, significa un aumento del
220%.," ha dichiarato il direttore dello stesso Centro, Milan Ivanovic.
I
medici di questa regione non possono affermare la causa dell'aumento
delle
malattie cancerogene, però temono che si tratti delle conseguenze
dell'uso
delle munizioni all'uranio depleto combinato con plutonio.
Infine ,i medici di questa regione hanno fatto appello ai loro colleghi
kosovari di non nascondere la
verità alla gente perchè sarebbe un gesto disumano nei confronti della
popolazione minacciata da
questa malattia incurabile.
1.FONTE: FrVESTI
2.TITOLO: Irradia anche il poligono della NATO "Barbara" ?
3. INDICE: "La sindrome dei Balcani"turba i cittadini di Livno e Tuzla,
in
Bosnia.
4.SITO INTERNET:
http://www.frvesti.com/vest.asp?t=81023&s=dnevnik.gif&e=
5.NUMERO DI PAGINE: 1.
6.DATA: 29.01.2001.
Il direttore dell'Istituto per la salute pubblica a Tuzla , dr Zijad
Beslagic, afferma che "la sindrome dei Balcani" turba i cittadini del
cantone di Tuzla perchè il numero degli ammalati dal cancro è
aumentato. Nel periodo 1996-1999 sono stati notati 315 ammalati da
malattie
cancerogene su 100.000 cittadini. Anche i cittadini del cantone di Livno
sono in preda al panico a causa della stessa
ragione.quanto al numero degli malati di cancro, questo cantone si trova
tra i primi sul territorio
bosniaco. I cittadini di Livno sono molto preoccupati perchè nella
Pianura
di Livno esiste il poligono militare della Nato dove si effettuano
spesso i
tiri a segno della artiglieria Inoltre, di
nuovo si sta parlando degli scarti nucleari che, a quanto si dice, sono
depositati nella Pianura di Livno.
I dati sugli ammalati da malattie cancerogene si ottengono molto
difficilmente.
Il presidente del comitato per il ritorno dei Serbi a Bosanska Krajina
dice
che le affermazioni di Livno sono lanciate apposta per impedire il
ritorno
dei Serbi espulsi da quel territorio
1.FONTE: "Glas Javnosti ".
2. TITOLO: La metà per l'indipendenza del Monte Negro.
3. INDICE: Il sondaggio in comuni montenegrini.
4.SITO INTERNET:
http://arhiva.glas-javnosti.co.yu/arhiva/2001/01/25/srpski/P01012409.shtml
5. NUMERO DI PAGINE: 1..
6.DATA 25.01.2001.
Nel sondaggio del Centro governativo per la democrazia, l'agenzia
"Damar",
in otto comuni
montenegrini , su di un campione di 1.028 persone , il 49,8% dei
cittadini
si è dichiarato per il Monte Negro indipendente e il 39,8% contro.
1.FONTE: "Politika AD".
2.TITOLO: L'eventuale intervento delle forze di polizia jugoslave sotto
la
sorveglianza degli osservatori stranieri e giornalisti.
3.INDICE: ///
4.SITO INTERNET: http://www.politika.co.yu/2001/0129/01_05.htm
5. NUMERO DI PAGINE: 1.
6.DATA: 29.01.2001.
"Se entro un mese non si risolve la questione delle attività dei
terroristi
albanesi nella zona
di sicurezza terrestre al sud della Serbia, ci sara un intervento
decisivo
delle forze di polizia le cui azioni potranno essere seguite dagli
osservatori stranieri e dai giornalisti "- ha detto per la radio tedesca
"Deutsche Wele"il Ministro federale degli Interni , Zoran Zivkovic.
Vogliamo solo ricordare che, nella cosiddetta "Zona di sicurezza"negli
ultimi giorni sono
feriti quattro soldati jugoslavi mentre un soldato è stato ucciso.
1.FONTE: Politika AD
TITOLO: La Banca Centrale Jugoslava (N B J) apre 100 uffici di cambio
valute
INDICE: Scarsità di divise agli sportelli bancari.
SITO INTERNET: http://www.politika.co.yu/2001/0127/01_03.htm
NUMERO DI PAGINE: 1
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consulteque.com e' il sito internet dove l'offerta dei
professionisti incontra la domanda delle imprese!
Seleziona on line i professionisti piu qualificati per
svolgere un'attivita di consulenza per la tua azienda.
Entra anche tu in consulteque.com e risparmia il tuo tempo.
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1083358/www.consulteque.com
pressi dei poligoni nato in bosnia.
sulla guerra chimica: nafta a novi sad.
politica: montenegro per l'indipendenza?; polizia pronta contro l'ucpmb.
economia: cambio valuta.
alberto tarozzi.
1. FONTE: tanjug
2.TITOLO: Libro sui segreti delle munizioni usate in Kosovo.
3.AUTORE :l'Agenzia"Tanjug".
4.SITO INTERNET: http://vesti.freeb92.net/press-index.phtml"
5. NUMERO DI PAGINE: !.
6.DATA: 28.01.2001- Le notizie per il 27.01.2001.
In questi giorni è stato pubblicato il libro"L'Uranio depleto- la
guerra
invisibile"in Portugalo-rende
noto l'agenzia jugoslava "Tanjug".Gli autori del libro Martin Mesonie,
Frederica Lur e Rodzer
Trilingue sostengono che la munizione usata nella guerra nel Golfo, nei
Balcani e nel Kosovo,
è fatta di materiale che è un miscuglio pericoloso di scarti nucleari.
Loro
affermano che nei comandi delle truppe americane è stato confermato che
oltre all'uranio
impoverito nella lavorazione delle munizioni sparate nel Golfo, nei
Balcani e nel Kosovo è stato usato il molto più pericoloso -il
plutonio..Loro citano il fatto che lo Stato Maggiore americano
nel Kosovo ha ritirato alcuni contingenti delle truppe dalla zona
contaminata perchè c'è
pericolo sulla salute dei militari.Tutto questo come una conferma che
nella
zone colpite ci sono
ancora le conseguenze dalla radioattività.
1.FONTE: FR VESTI.
2.TITOLO: E ' possibile aspettarsi un aumento del cancro.
3. INDICE: Secondo le affermazioni dei medici della regione di Kosovska
Mitrovica.
4. SITO INTERNET:
http://www.frvesti.com/vest.asp?t=79513&s=dnevnik.gif&e=
5.NUMERO DI PAGINE: ½.
6:DATA: 25.01.2001.
L'aumento notevole del numero delle persone ammalate di cancro nell'anno
scorso rispetto all'anno precedente, indica che è molto probabile un
boom
delle malattie cancerogene
nella regione di Kosovska Mitrovica."Solo nell'anno scorso nel Centro
sanitario a Kosovska Mitrovica sono state curate 158 persone che
rispetto
all'anno 1998, quando erano solo 68 persone, significa un aumento del
220%.," ha dichiarato il direttore dello stesso Centro, Milan Ivanovic.
I
medici di questa regione non possono affermare la causa dell'aumento
delle
malattie cancerogene, però temono che si tratti delle conseguenze
dell'uso
delle munizioni all'uranio depleto combinato con plutonio.
Infine ,i medici di questa regione hanno fatto appello ai loro colleghi
kosovari di non nascondere la
verità alla gente perchè sarebbe un gesto disumano nei confronti della
popolazione minacciata da
questa malattia incurabile.
1.FONTE: FrVESTI
2.TITOLO: Irradia anche il poligono della NATO "Barbara" ?
3. INDICE: "La sindrome dei Balcani"turba i cittadini di Livno e Tuzla,
in
Bosnia.
4.SITO INTERNET:
http://www.frvesti.com/vest.asp?t=81023&s=dnevnik.gif&e=
5.NUMERO DI PAGINE: 1.
6.DATA: 29.01.2001.
Il direttore dell'Istituto per la salute pubblica a Tuzla , dr Zijad
Beslagic, afferma che "la sindrome dei Balcani" turba i cittadini del
cantone di Tuzla perchè il numero degli ammalati dal cancro è
aumentato. Nel periodo 1996-1999 sono stati notati 315 ammalati da
malattie
cancerogene su 100.000 cittadini. Anche i cittadini del cantone di Livno
sono in preda al panico a causa della stessa
ragione.quanto al numero degli malati di cancro, questo cantone si trova
tra i primi sul territorio
bosniaco. I cittadini di Livno sono molto preoccupati perchè nella
Pianura
di Livno esiste il poligono militare della Nato dove si effettuano
spesso i
tiri a segno della artiglieria Inoltre, di
nuovo si sta parlando degli scarti nucleari che, a quanto si dice, sono
depositati nella Pianura di Livno.
I dati sugli ammalati da malattie cancerogene si ottengono molto
difficilmente.
Il presidente del comitato per il ritorno dei Serbi a Bosanska Krajina
dice
che le affermazioni di Livno sono lanciate apposta per impedire il
ritorno
dei Serbi espulsi da quel territorio
1.FONTE: "Glas Javnosti ".
2. TITOLO: La metà per l'indipendenza del Monte Negro.
3. INDICE: Il sondaggio in comuni montenegrini.
4.SITO INTERNET:
http://arhiva.glas-javnosti.co.yu/arhiva/2001/01/25/srpski/P01012409.shtml
5. NUMERO DI PAGINE: 1..
6.DATA 25.01.2001.
Nel sondaggio del Centro governativo per la democrazia, l'agenzia
"Damar",
in otto comuni
montenegrini , su di un campione di 1.028 persone , il 49,8% dei
cittadini
si è dichiarato per il Monte Negro indipendente e il 39,8% contro.
1.FONTE: "Politika AD".
2.TITOLO: L'eventuale intervento delle forze di polizia jugoslave sotto
la
sorveglianza degli osservatori stranieri e giornalisti.
3.INDICE: ///
4.SITO INTERNET: http://www.politika.co.yu/2001/0129/01_05.htm
5. NUMERO DI PAGINE: 1.
6.DATA: 29.01.2001.
"Se entro un mese non si risolve la questione delle attività dei
terroristi
albanesi nella zona
di sicurezza terrestre al sud della Serbia, ci sara un intervento
decisivo
delle forze di polizia le cui azioni potranno essere seguite dagli
osservatori stranieri e dai giornalisti "- ha detto per la radio tedesca
"Deutsche Wele"il Ministro federale degli Interni , Zoran Zivkovic.
Vogliamo solo ricordare che, nella cosiddetta "Zona di sicurezza"negli
ultimi giorni sono
feriti quattro soldati jugoslavi mentre un soldato è stato ucciso.
1.FONTE: Politika AD
TITOLO: La Banca Centrale Jugoslava (N B J) apre 100 uffici di cambio
valute
INDICE: Scarsità di divise agli sportelli bancari.
SITO INTERNET: http://www.politika.co.yu/2001/0127/01_03.htm
NUMERO DI PAGINE: 1
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consulteque.com e' il sito internet dove l'offerta dei
professionisti incontra la domanda delle imprese!
Seleziona on line i professionisti piu qualificati per
svolgere un'attivita di consulenza per la tua azienda.
Entra anche tu in consulteque.com e risparmia il tuo tempo.
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1083358/www.consulteque.com
31 gennaio: Genova
2 febbraio: Bologna
10 febbraio: Sesto S. Giovanni (MI)
... ed altre dal Comitato Scienziate/i contro la guerra
-----------------------------------
>To: Ova adresa el. pošte je zaštićena od spambotova. Omogućite JavaScript da biste je videli.
>From: Rifondazione Comunista <rifcomunista@...>
>Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:32:22 +0100
>Subject: [Cerchio di G8] manifestazione su uranio impoverito
>
>I Gruppi Consiliari PRC della Circoscrizione Bassa Valbisagno e del Comune
>di Genova organizzano per mercoledì 31 gennaio 2001 alle ore 20.30 presso
>la Sala della Circoscrizione Bassa Valbisagno via Canevari 36 un dibattito
>pubblico su:
>E L'AVEVANO CHIAMATA GUERRA UMANITARIA
>Danno ecologico e contaminazione radioattiva sulle sponde dell'Adriatico
>
>partecipano:
>Carlo Pona scienziato
>Valerio Gennaro medico
>Fulvio Grimaldi giornalista
>
>prima del dibattito verrà proiettato il video di Fulvio Grimaldi: "Popoli
>di troppo.."
---
> http://contropiani2000.org/calendario/oltre_uranio.htm
Oltre l'Uranio
Morte Chimica e Guerra Umanitaria
VENERDI' 2 FEBBRAIO 2001
ALLE ORE 21
PRESSO LA SALA DE' NOTAI
v. dei Pignattari 1 - BOLOGNA
PALESTINA - IRAQ - BOSNIA - SOMALIA - BALCANI
QUANTI MORTI ANCORA PER MOTIVI UMANITARI?
Nel corso dell'incontro verrà presentato il documento:
"Alcune testi e fatti sull'uranio impoverito (DU), sul suo uso nei
Balcani,
sulle conseguenze sulla salute di militari e popolazione"
http://www.peacelink.it/tematiche/disarmo/u238/documenti/uranio_impoverito.h
tml
di M. Cristaldi, A. Di Fazio, C. Pona, A. Tarozzi, M. Zucchetti del
Comitato Scienziate e Scienziati contro la guerra
(http://www.scienzaepace.it)
Intervengono:
* Quando la guerra è guerra, diritto di strage
Stefano DE ANGELIS
Tribunale Internazionale contro i crimini della NATO - Ramsey Clark
http://www.pasti.org/tribhome.htm
Gastone DALL'ASEN, avvocato
* Armi e morti future
Achille LODOVISI, ricercatore IRES Toscana
Paolo BARTOLOMEI, fisico
* Armarci per difenderci, perché e per chi?
Angelo CAVAGNA, presidente GAVCI
http://www.peacelink.it/users/gavci
* Una guerra chimica? Chi l'avrebbe mai detto !
Alberto TAROZZI, sociologo Università di Bologna
introduce Fausto CONCER, Comitato Cittadino contro la Guerra
incontro pubblico organizzato da il
COMITATO CITTADINO CONTRO LA GUERRA
il comitato cittadino contro la guerra
v. Cuccoli 1/c - bologna - controguerra@...
Volantino "on line" - Scarica, stampa e diffondi:
PDF - http://contropiani2000.org/calendario/oltre_uranio.pdf
RTF - http://contropiani2000.org/calendario/oltre_uranio.rtf
ATTENZIONE:
Il comitato ha cambiato indirizzo, vi preghiamo di aggiornare la vostra
rubrica.
Vecchio indirizzo: controguerra@...
Nuovo indirizzo: controguerra@...
---
Sabato 10 febbraio, ore 16:00, Sesto S.Giovanni (MI).
Organizza: Centro per l'Educazione, la Cooperazione e lo Sviluppo, sulla
condizione delle popolazioni colpite e contaminate dai bombardamenti
Nato.
Sono previsti gli interventi di M.Zucchetti, di un giornalista della
rivista
Limes, di Enrico Vigna dell'Associazione S.O.S. Jugoslavia e quelli di
cooperanti che sono stati in Bosnia e Kossovo con diverse ONG.
---
ALTRE SEGNALAZIONI DAL COMITATO SCIENZIATE/I CONTRO LA GUERRA:
sabato 3 febbraio, Roma Garbatella, CSOA "La Strada"
Cristaldi, Pona, Di Fazio (?)
venerdi' 16 febbraio alle ore 21:00
presso la sede della Unione Arnatese di Consumo di Gallarate (VA),
Rifondazione Comunista organizza un incontro-dibattito
sul tema dell'Uranio Impoverito
Zucchetti
22 marzo, Varese, Centro Culturale Serbo
Zucchetti
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid‘979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Se vuoi sviluppare il tuo business, entra anche tu in
Consulteque.com, la piu grande community on line di
professionisti, dove l'offerta incontra la domanda delle imprese.
E poi potrai leggere le news, discutere con gli altri nel forum,
organizzare con noi i tuoi viaggi e molto altro ...
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1084757/www.consulteque.com
2 febbraio: Bologna
10 febbraio: Sesto S. Giovanni (MI)
... ed altre dal Comitato Scienziate/i contro la guerra
-----------------------------------
>To: Ova adresa el. pošte je zaštićena od spambotova. Omogućite JavaScript da biste je videli.
>From: Rifondazione Comunista <rifcomunista@...>
>Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:32:22 +0100
>Subject: [Cerchio di G8] manifestazione su uranio impoverito
>
>I Gruppi Consiliari PRC della Circoscrizione Bassa Valbisagno e del Comune
>di Genova organizzano per mercoledì 31 gennaio 2001 alle ore 20.30 presso
>la Sala della Circoscrizione Bassa Valbisagno via Canevari 36 un dibattito
>pubblico su:
>E L'AVEVANO CHIAMATA GUERRA UMANITARIA
>Danno ecologico e contaminazione radioattiva sulle sponde dell'Adriatico
>
>partecipano:
>Carlo Pona scienziato
>Valerio Gennaro medico
>Fulvio Grimaldi giornalista
>
>prima del dibattito verrà proiettato il video di Fulvio Grimaldi: "Popoli
>di troppo.."
---
> http://contropiani2000.org/calendario/oltre_uranio.htm
Oltre l'Uranio
Morte Chimica e Guerra Umanitaria
VENERDI' 2 FEBBRAIO 2001
ALLE ORE 21
PRESSO LA SALA DE' NOTAI
v. dei Pignattari 1 - BOLOGNA
PALESTINA - IRAQ - BOSNIA - SOMALIA - BALCANI
QUANTI MORTI ANCORA PER MOTIVI UMANITARI?
Nel corso dell'incontro verrà presentato il documento:
"Alcune testi e fatti sull'uranio impoverito (DU), sul suo uso nei
Balcani,
sulle conseguenze sulla salute di militari e popolazione"
http://www.peacelink.it/tematiche/disarmo/u238/documenti/uranio_impoverito.h
tml
di M. Cristaldi, A. Di Fazio, C. Pona, A. Tarozzi, M. Zucchetti del
Comitato Scienziate e Scienziati contro la guerra
(http://www.scienzaepace.it)
Intervengono:
* Quando la guerra è guerra, diritto di strage
Stefano DE ANGELIS
Tribunale Internazionale contro i crimini della NATO - Ramsey Clark
http://www.pasti.org/tribhome.htm
Gastone DALL'ASEN, avvocato
* Armi e morti future
Achille LODOVISI, ricercatore IRES Toscana
Paolo BARTOLOMEI, fisico
* Armarci per difenderci, perché e per chi?
Angelo CAVAGNA, presidente GAVCI
http://www.peacelink.it/users/gavci
* Una guerra chimica? Chi l'avrebbe mai detto !
Alberto TAROZZI, sociologo Università di Bologna
introduce Fausto CONCER, Comitato Cittadino contro la Guerra
incontro pubblico organizzato da il
COMITATO CITTADINO CONTRO LA GUERRA
il comitato cittadino contro la guerra
v. Cuccoli 1/c - bologna - controguerra@...
Volantino "on line" - Scarica, stampa e diffondi:
PDF - http://contropiani2000.org/calendario/oltre_uranio.pdf
RTF - http://contropiani2000.org/calendario/oltre_uranio.rtf
ATTENZIONE:
Il comitato ha cambiato indirizzo, vi preghiamo di aggiornare la vostra
rubrica.
Vecchio indirizzo: controguerra@...
Nuovo indirizzo: controguerra@...
---
Sabato 10 febbraio, ore 16:00, Sesto S.Giovanni (MI).
Organizza: Centro per l'Educazione, la Cooperazione e lo Sviluppo, sulla
condizione delle popolazioni colpite e contaminate dai bombardamenti
Nato.
Sono previsti gli interventi di M.Zucchetti, di un giornalista della
rivista
Limes, di Enrico Vigna dell'Associazione S.O.S. Jugoslavia e quelli di
cooperanti che sono stati in Bosnia e Kossovo con diverse ONG.
---
ALTRE SEGNALAZIONI DAL COMITATO SCIENZIATE/I CONTRO LA GUERRA:
sabato 3 febbraio, Roma Garbatella, CSOA "La Strada"
Cristaldi, Pona, Di Fazio (?)
venerdi' 16 febbraio alle ore 21:00
presso la sede della Unione Arnatese di Consumo di Gallarate (VA),
Rifondazione Comunista organizza un incontro-dibattito
sul tema dell'Uranio Impoverito
Zucchetti
22 marzo, Varese, Centro Culturale Serbo
Zucchetti
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid‘979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Se vuoi sviluppare il tuo business, entra anche tu in
Consulteque.com, la piu grande community on line di
professionisti, dove l'offerta incontra la domanda delle imprese.
E poi potrai leggere le news, discutere con gli altri nel forum,
organizzare con noi i tuoi viaggi e molto altro ...
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1084757/www.consulteque.com
edited by alexander cockburn and
jeffrey st. clair
http://www.counterpunch.org/black.html
An Impartial Tribunal,
Really?
by Christopher Black
The indictment of Slobodan Milosevic for alleged war
crimes raises important questions about the impartiality
and, ultimately, the purpose of the International Criminal
Tribunal. For centuries, the independence of judicial bodies
has been considered one of the fundamental precepts of
the quest for justice. As Lord Hewart stated in 1924, it is
"...of fundamental importance that justice should not only be
done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be
done." It has also been said that there is nothing more
important than the public administration of justice. But in the
case of the International Criminal Tribunal a compelling
argument can be made that private justice has replaced
public justice, that even the appearance of fundamental
justice has been replaced by an open contempt for justice.
It is clear that from the beginning American, British, French
and German interests were behind the creation of the
Tribunal and worked ceaselessly behind the scenes in
order to create it. They first considered doing so in regards
to Iraq and Saddam Hussein, during the Gulf War. The idea
apparently originated with the United States Department of
the Army, which alone should tell you something about its
true purpose. The rhetoric used to justify such a body to
the general public was of course heavily seasoned with
concerns for "human rights" the "dignity of the individual",
"genocide" and "democracy".
However, they had a problem. It was
generally agreed that no such tribunal could be created
without the mechanism of a treaty which had to be ratified
by all those affected by it. There was no time to create
such a treaty with respect to Hussein so other methods
were used to put pressure on the Iraqi government. But
between 1991 and 1993, the use of an international criminal
court as a means of effecting policy and to be created by
the members of the Security Council, instead of by treaty
was pushed by those four countries. A draft treaty to
create a truly international criminal court, one which applied
to all states, the last in a long list of attempts dating back
to the 1890's, was put together. But its ratification has not
taken place as several important powers, particularly the
United States, refuse to sign it for fear of being caught in its
web. For thirty years the United States has tried to block
such a treaty. It opposes universal jurisdiction and it
opposes an independent prosecutor. It wants any
prosecutions to go through the Security Council subject to
its right of veto. In fact, Jesse Helms, the conservative US
senator said such a treaty, if presented to congress for
ratification would be "dead on arrival". It would seem that
the treaty is itself nothing more than window dressing to
satisfy the public that the nations of the world really care
about human rights and war crimes in order to complement
their rhetoric about it. For without ratification by the major
powers it is a dead letter. The United States remains
stubborn in its opposition to this treaty but then it has a bit
more to worry about than most countries.
The next opportunity to try this experiment was Yugoslavia.
In order to accelerate the break up of that country into
quasi-independent colonies, principally of Germany and the
United States, it was necessary to discredit their
leaderships. An effective propaganda weapon in such an
exercise is of course a tribunal with an international
character which the public will accept as a neutral
instrument of justice but which is controlled for political
ends.
The Tribunal was created by the Security Council in its
Resolutions 808 and 827 of 1993. Both resolutions stated
that the situation in Bosnia at that time, constituted a threat
to international peace and security and that a tribunal to
prosecute war criminals would help to restore peace. It all
sounds very nice until one realizes that there was no basis
for the characterization of the situation in Bosnia as a threat
to international peace. It was a civil war (partly controlled
by the very countries which wanted to create a tribunal).
But the members of the Security Council had to
characterize it that way otherwise the members of the
Security Council had no jurisdiction to act. The setup for
this characterization was Resolution 688 of 1991 in which
the Security Council stated that disregard for human rights
constitutes a threat to international security and can no
longer be treated as an internal matter. This
reinterpretation, this revision of the UN Charter, which in
fact undermines the very basis of the Charter was forcefully
advocated by the German foreign minister Mr. Genscher in
speeches he gave to the German parliament and to the
Canadian parliament in Ottawa and by British, French and
of course American ministers in speeches and
memorandums to each other.
Chapter VII of the UN Charter requires that there be a
threat to the peace or an act of aggression before the
Security Council can make use of its special powers set out
in that Chapter. It has always been interpreted to mean and
was meant to mean a threat to international peace not
national peace. The members of the Security Council
recognized this and so had to redefine a national problem
as an international one. Yet in all those speeches and
memoranda there is not one compelling reason given for
doing this except vague references to the collapse of the
socialist bloc, and the imperative to establish a new world
order. In fact, Mr. Genscher in his speech to the Canadian
parliament stated
unequivocally that no nation would any longer be allowed to
ignore Security Council decisions. Even if this redefinition
were a legitimate interpretation of the UN Charter, which it
is not, the UN Charter only speaks of economic measures
and then military measures, not judicial or criminal
measures.
Chapter VII has to be read in context with Chapter I of the
Charter which speaks of international cooperation in solving
international problems of an economic, social, cultural or
humanitarian character. It says nothing of humanitarian
problems of a national character. It states that the UN is
based on the principle of the sovereign equality of its
members, a fundamental principle of international law, and
the first guarantee of the right to self-determination of the
world's peoples. If a people does not have the right of
sovereignty, the right to self-determination is a sham. This
principle is completely denied by the creation of the
Tribunal. The Tribunal itself explicitly denies that this
principle applies in its own statements as do its political
supporters, but never, of course, in reference to
themselves.
Lastly, the Charter states that nothing contained in the
Charter shall authorize the UN to intervene in matters which
are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state.
This fundamental principle, put in the Charter so that the UN
could not be used by some members to bully others has
also been fatally undermined by the creation of the
Tribunal. The members of the Security Council, more
precisely, the permanent members, now hold the opposite
position, and I submit, do so for reasons connected more
with imperialism not humanitarianism.
In light of these facts the Security Council's authority to
create such a tribunal is in my view more than questionable.
That it was created is to be credited to Madeleine Albright,
who used some effective persuasion with the Russian and
Chinese members to vote for its creation in return for
economic consideration and with a view to controlling
smaller states within their own spheres of interest.
Yugoslavia was the first experiment in using a quasi-judicial
international body to attack the principle of sovereignty.
And as the Americans have learned so well, the best way
to get your domestic population behind you as you proceed
to break another country, economically and militarily is to
get them to hate those in power in that country. The Serb
leadership was targeted, and transformed into caricatures
of evil. There were comparisons to Adolf Hitler, a
comparison used with surprising frequency by the United
States against the long list of nations it has attacked in the
last 50 years, though sometimes they are just labeled as
common criminals, like Manuel Noriega, or mad, like
Ghadaffi, if the leader or the country is too small to make
the Hitler comparison stick. I think Saddam Hussein was
the first to be compared to Hitler, and declared a common
criminal and a madman all at the same time.
The Tribunal from the outset was
the creation of particular
governments. Their motives are clear from the
preliminary discussions in the Security Council on the
creation of the court which focused almost entirely on
crimes allegedly committed by Serbs and their leadership.
Since its inception it has kept this focus. The majority of
indictments have been directed at Serbs even though there
is substantial evidence of the commission of serious war
crimes by Croats and Bosnian Muslims.
The Tribunal has jurisdiction over war crimes and crimes
against humanity, but crimes against peace, the worst
crime under the Nuremberg principles, are not within the
purview of the tribunal. The underlying reason for this is that
the members of the Security Council preferred to reserve
to themselves competence in the field of aggression and
similar crimes against peace. The members of the Security
Council have a very keen sense of humour or perhaps more
accurately, self-preservation.
In a statement to the Secretary-General of the United
Nation, Mr. Boutros-boutros Ghali, on January 21, 1994, by
Antonio Cassese the Tribunal's political character was
made quite clear when he said in reference to the role of
the Tribunal, "The political and diplomatic response
(to the Balkans conflict) takes into account the exigencies
and the tempo of the international community. The military
response will come at the appropriate time." In other
words, the Tribunal is considered a political response. He
went on to state, "Our tribunal will not be simply "window
dressing" but a decisive step in the construction of a new
world order."
The governing statute of the Tribunal states in Article 16
that the Prosecutor shall act independently as a separate
organ of the Tribunal and shall not seek or receive
instruction from any government or any other source.
Article 32 states that the expenses of the Tribunal shall be
borne by the regular budget of the United Nations. Both of
these provisions have been openly and continuously
violated.
The Tribunal itself, through its senior officials, openly brags
about its particularly close ties to the American
government. In her remarks to the United States Supreme
Court in Washington, D.C. on April 5th of this year, Judge
Gabrielle Kirk Mcdonald, President of the Tribunal, and an
American stated, "We benefited from the strong support of
concerned governments and dedicated individuals such as
Secretary Albright. As the permanent representative to the
United Nations, she had worked with unceasing resolve to
establish the Tribunal. Indeed, we often refer to her as the
"mother of the Tribunal". If she is the mother then Bill
Clinton is the father, as Louise Arbour confirmed by her
action of reporting to the President of the United States the
decision to indict Milosevic two days before she announced
it to the rest of the world, in blatant violation of her duty to
remain independent. Further, she and the current
prosecutor have made several public appearances with U.S
officials, including Madeleine Albright, and both have openly
stated that they rely on Nato governments for
investigations, governments which have a great interest in
the undermining of the Yugoslavian leadership.
In 1996, the prosecutor met with the Secretary-General of
Nato and the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe to
"establish contacts and begin discussing modalities of
cooperation and Assistance". On May 9th, 1996 a
memorandum of understanding between the Office of the
Prosecutor and Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers
Europe (SHAPE) was signed by both parties. Further
meetings have taken place since including that of the
president of the Tribunal with General Wesley Clark. The
memorandum of May 9th spelled out the practical
arrangements for support to the tribunal and the transfer of
indicted persons to the Tribunal. In other words, Nato
forces became the gendarmes of the Tribunal, not UN
forces, and the Tribunal put itself at the disposal of Nato.
This relationship has continued despite the Tribunal's
requirement to be independent of any national government
and, therefore, group of national governments.
The Tribunal has received substantial funds from individual
States, private foundations and corporations in violation of
Article 32 of its Charter. Much of its money has come from
the U.S. government directly in cash and donations of
computer equipment. In the last year for which public
figures are available, 1994/95, the United States provided
$700,000 in cash and $2,300,000 worth of equipment. That
same year the Open Society Institute, a foundation
established by George Soros, the American billionaire
financier, to bring "openness" to the former east bloc
countries contributed $150,000 and the Rockefeller family,
through the Rockefeller Foundation, contributed $50,000
and there have been donations from corporations such as
Time-Warner, and Discovery Products, both US
corporations. It also important to know that Mr. Soros'
foundation not only funds the Tribunal it also funds the main
KLA newspaper in Pristina, an obvious conflict of interest
that has not been mentioned once in the western press.
The Tribunal also receives money from the United States
Institute for Peace for its Outreach project, a public
relations arm of the Tribunal set up to overcome opposition
in the former Yugoslav republics to its work and the
constant criticisms of selective prosecution and the
application of double standards; objections which have
obvious merit and which are never answered by anyone at
the Tribunal or by any of its sponsors. The Institute for
Peace is stated to be " an independent, non-partisan
federal institution created and funded by Congress to
strengthen the nation's capacity to promote the peaceful
resolution of international conflict." .Established in 1984
under Ronald Reagan, its Board of Directors
is appointed by the President of the United States.
The Tribunal also receives support from the Coalition For
International Justice whose purpose is also to enhance
public opinion of the Tribunal. The CIJ was founded and is
funded by, again, George Soros' Open Society Institute
and something called CEELI, the Central and East
European Law Institute, created by the American Bar
Association and lawyers close to the U.S. government to
promote the replacement of socialist legal systems with
free market ones.
These groups also have supplied many of the legal staff of
the Tribunal. In her speech to the Supreme Court, Judge
Mcdonald said, "The Tribunal has been well served by the
tremendous work of a number of lawyers who have come
to the Tribunal through the CIJ and CEELI..." It is also
interesting to note that the occasion of Judge McDonalds
speech was her acceptance of an award from the
American Bar Association and CEELI. In the same speech
she also said," We are now seeking funding from states
and foundations to carry out this critical effort."
The new prosecutor Carla Del Ponte, on September 30, at
a press conference, thanked the director of the FBI for
assisting the tribunal and stated "I am very appreciative of
the important support that the U.S government has
provided the tribunal. I look forward to their continued
support." OnSeptember 29th, in response to a question as
to whether the tribunal would be investigating crimes
Committed in Kosovo after June 10, or crimes committed
by others (meaning Nato) in the Yugoslav theatre of
operations, "The primary focus of the Office of The
Prosecutor must be on the investigation and prosecution of
the five leaders of the FRY and Serbia who have already
been indicted." Why this "must" be is not explained. Why, if
the Tribunal is impartial wouldn't it be just as focussed on
Nato war crimes, the war crimes of Clinton, Schroeder ,
Chirac, Chretien etc? Why did it still need to investigate to
support the indictments against the leaders of the
government and military of Yugoslavia if there was already
evidence to justify those indictments?
Well, we can speculate why when we consider that the last
prosecutor, Louis Arbour, who was asked to investigate all
Nato leaders for war crimes, instead accepted a job from
one of them, the Prime Minister of Canada, Jean Chretien.
She now sits in the scarlet robes of a judge of the Supreme
Court of Canada, a lifetime appointment, her reward for
handing down the indictment against Mr. Milosevic, despite
the lack of evidence and (if you believe the reports of the
Spanish and RCMP forensic experts recently returned from
Kosovo) the continuing lack of evidence of the systematic
crimes he is accused of.
On April 19th Judge McDonald "expressed her deep
appreciation to the U.S. Government for its pledge of
$500,000 for the Outreach project which was announced
on April 16 by Harold Koh, U.S. Assistant Secretary of
State.
In her speech to the Council On Foreign Relations in New
York on May 12 of this year Judge McDonald stated," The
U.S. government has very generously agreed to provide
$500,000 and to help to encourage other States to
contribute. However, the moral imperative to end the
violence in the region is shared by all, including the
corporate sector. I am pleased, therefore, that a major
corporation has recently donated computer equipment
worth three million dollars, which will substantially enhance
our operating capacity."
From the start, the Office of the Prosecutor has had
meetings with NGO's that are eager to " cooperate with
and assist the tribunal", many of them linked to George
Soros through his Open Society Foundation. All this money
flows through a special UN account which is financed by
assessed contributions from member states and voluntary
contributions from states and corporations again in violation
of its statute. As an aside it's interesting that its role as a
propaganda tool was indirectly acknowledged by its own
staff when they failed to provide for a courtroom or holding
cells in their first budget of approximately $ 32 million
dollars. The Security Council sent them back to redraft the
budget to include those items. After all, this was supposed
to be a criminal tribunal! They did so. The difference was
an added expense of $500,000. It's also interesting to
know that three of its first four rooms in the Peace Palace
in the Hague were loaned to them by the Carnegie
Foundation.
In order to give itself the appearance of a judicial body the
Tribunal has persons appointed as judges, prosecutors,
clerks, investigators, and has its own rules of procedure
and evidence, its own prison system. It says it applies the
presumption of innocence. However, unlike criminal
courts, with which we are all familiar (or, perhaps not), the
court itself is involved in the laying of the charges. When a
charge is to be laid the approval of one of the trial judges
must be obtained. That approval is only given if a prima
facie case is established. That is, a case which if not
answered could result in a conviction. Yet, despite this
close relationship between the prosecutor and the judges
and the commitment to the charges the judges have made
by signing the indictment , the rules insist on the
presumption of innocence. This presumption is
compromised in other ways. The most egregious is that
upon arrest detention is automatic. There is no bail, no form
of release pending trial, unless the prisoner proves
"exceptional circumstances". Loss of job, loss of contact
with friends, family, indeed country is not sufficient. Even ill
health has not been sufficient to get bail. Prisoners are
treated as if they had been convicted. They are kept in
cells and have to obey prison rules, are subject to discipline
if they do not, constant surveillance, censored mail,
restricted family visits, communication with family at their
own expense and there are restrictions on what they can
see or hear on radio or television. Prisoners have had to
wait many months before a trial takes place, sometimes
years. Yet, still they insist these men are presumed
innocent. The question is by whom? By the judges, one of
whom laid the charge in the first place?
Its rules of evidence are relaxed so that protections on the
admission of hearsay evidence developed over centuries in
all national courts are set aside and replaced by an
anything is admissible if deemed relevant approach even if
it is hearsay. There is no jury. Witnesses can testify
anonymously, or not be shown in court. In its yearbook for
1994, this statement appears, "The tribunal does not need
to shackle itself with restrictive rules which have developed
out of the ancient trial-by-jury system." There are provisions
in the rules for closed hearings, in circumstances which are
vaguely defined, secret trials, the very essence of injustice
and of political courts. It is now increasing its use of sealed
indictments, so that no one knows if they have been
charged until the military police swoop down on them on the
street in any country. Suspects, persons not indicted, can
be detained for up to ninety days without charge. We all
know from experience what prisoners can undergo in a day
or two at the mercy of most police forces. Ninety days.
Anyone one of us here could be detained by the Tribunal
for that length of time. All they have to say is they have
some reason to suspect you. This is easily constructed.
Perhaps its most dangerous rule
is Rule 92 that states confessions shall be
presumed to be free and voluntary unless the contrary is
established (by the prisoner). Just think - presumed to be
free and voluntary after 90 days at the mercy of military
police and prosecutors. Almost every other court in the
world presumes the opposite or, because of the notorious
unreliability of confessions made in police custody are
moving to prohibit their use entirely. This Tribunal goes
back to the days of Star Chamber and the justice of the
13th century. Finally, we have imprisonment of those
sentenced in foreign countries so that not only are they
imprisoned, they are at the same time exiled. There is even
a special provision for the obtaining of evidence from
NGO's such as George Soros Open Society Foundation,
whose conflict of interest has already been mentioned.
Accused have the right to choose counsel on paper but in
reality that right is infringed by the Registrar who can
disqualify counsel for all sorts of reasons including being
unfriendly to the Tribunal. Such a counsel will be supplied if
the accuses insists strongly enough but it is not made easy.
There are cases in which the Registrar has barred lawyers
from particular countries because there are deemed to be
too many of them already representing accused persons,
and the use of its contempt powers is a powerful weapon
to intimidate counsel. Lawyers have been subject to large
fines for contempt.
No citizen of any country in the world would consider
themselves fairly tried before a court that was paid for,
staffed and assisted by private citizens or corporations
which had a direct stake in the outcome of the trial and who
were, themselves, in practical terms, immune from that
court. It is a well established principle of law that a party in
a legal action, whether civil or criminal, is entitled to ask for
the removal of any judge sitting on the case when there
exists a reasonable apprehension of bias. In this instance,
a compelling argument can be made that the bias is not
only apprehended, it is real, that it is not of one judge but of
the entire tribunal, that this is not a judicial body worthy of
international respect but a kangaroo court, a bogus court,
with a political purpose serving very powerful and
identifiable masters. To be consistent with my thesis I will
go further and say that as a political instrument designed to
violate, to destroy, the integrity and sovereignty of a
country, its creation is a crime against peace under the
Nuremberg Principles. Instead of resolving conflict as it
claims, it is used to justify conflict, instead of creating
peace, it is used to justify war and therefore is an
instrument of war.
Will Slobodan Milosevic receive
a fair trial if they take him? Will the leaders of Nato,
even be investigated let alone indicted for war crimes
committed in the brutal attack on the civilian population of
Yugoslavia, as my colleagues in Canada, South and Central
America, Spain, Norway, Greece, Britain, and the United
States have requested? As the English say, the proof is in
the pudding. Our requests have met with empty words and
no action. We made the requests in order to bring to the
attention of the world the crimes that were being committed
by Nato. We believe we have succeeded in that. If we have
not succeeded in bringing to justice the war criminals of
Nato, it is because we have exposed the political nature of
this Tribunal instead. It is up to all of us to act on this
knowledge.
Christopher Black is a Toronto defence lawyer and writer
and is one of the lawyers who made the request to the War
Crimes Tribunal to indict NATO leaders for war
crimes.
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I gruppi di discussione + interessanti e divertenti!
Le liste + calde!!
Il meglio di eCircle!!!
http://www.ecircle.it/ad789403/www.listparade.it
jeffrey st. clair
http://www.counterpunch.org/black.html
An Impartial Tribunal,
Really?
by Christopher Black
The indictment of Slobodan Milosevic for alleged war
crimes raises important questions about the impartiality
and, ultimately, the purpose of the International Criminal
Tribunal. For centuries, the independence of judicial bodies
has been considered one of the fundamental precepts of
the quest for justice. As Lord Hewart stated in 1924, it is
"...of fundamental importance that justice should not only be
done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be
done." It has also been said that there is nothing more
important than the public administration of justice. But in the
case of the International Criminal Tribunal a compelling
argument can be made that private justice has replaced
public justice, that even the appearance of fundamental
justice has been replaced by an open contempt for justice.
It is clear that from the beginning American, British, French
and German interests were behind the creation of the
Tribunal and worked ceaselessly behind the scenes in
order to create it. They first considered doing so in regards
to Iraq and Saddam Hussein, during the Gulf War. The idea
apparently originated with the United States Department of
the Army, which alone should tell you something about its
true purpose. The rhetoric used to justify such a body to
the general public was of course heavily seasoned with
concerns for "human rights" the "dignity of the individual",
"genocide" and "democracy".
However, they had a problem. It was
generally agreed that no such tribunal could be created
without the mechanism of a treaty which had to be ratified
by all those affected by it. There was no time to create
such a treaty with respect to Hussein so other methods
were used to put pressure on the Iraqi government. But
between 1991 and 1993, the use of an international criminal
court as a means of effecting policy and to be created by
the members of the Security Council, instead of by treaty
was pushed by those four countries. A draft treaty to
create a truly international criminal court, one which applied
to all states, the last in a long list of attempts dating back
to the 1890's, was put together. But its ratification has not
taken place as several important powers, particularly the
United States, refuse to sign it for fear of being caught in its
web. For thirty years the United States has tried to block
such a treaty. It opposes universal jurisdiction and it
opposes an independent prosecutor. It wants any
prosecutions to go through the Security Council subject to
its right of veto. In fact, Jesse Helms, the conservative US
senator said such a treaty, if presented to congress for
ratification would be "dead on arrival". It would seem that
the treaty is itself nothing more than window dressing to
satisfy the public that the nations of the world really care
about human rights and war crimes in order to complement
their rhetoric about it. For without ratification by the major
powers it is a dead letter. The United States remains
stubborn in its opposition to this treaty but then it has a bit
more to worry about than most countries.
The next opportunity to try this experiment was Yugoslavia.
In order to accelerate the break up of that country into
quasi-independent colonies, principally of Germany and the
United States, it was necessary to discredit their
leaderships. An effective propaganda weapon in such an
exercise is of course a tribunal with an international
character which the public will accept as a neutral
instrument of justice but which is controlled for political
ends.
The Tribunal was created by the Security Council in its
Resolutions 808 and 827 of 1993. Both resolutions stated
that the situation in Bosnia at that time, constituted a threat
to international peace and security and that a tribunal to
prosecute war criminals would help to restore peace. It all
sounds very nice until one realizes that there was no basis
for the characterization of the situation in Bosnia as a threat
to international peace. It was a civil war (partly controlled
by the very countries which wanted to create a tribunal).
But the members of the Security Council had to
characterize it that way otherwise the members of the
Security Council had no jurisdiction to act. The setup for
this characterization was Resolution 688 of 1991 in which
the Security Council stated that disregard for human rights
constitutes a threat to international security and can no
longer be treated as an internal matter. This
reinterpretation, this revision of the UN Charter, which in
fact undermines the very basis of the Charter was forcefully
advocated by the German foreign minister Mr. Genscher in
speeches he gave to the German parliament and to the
Canadian parliament in Ottawa and by British, French and
of course American ministers in speeches and
memorandums to each other.
Chapter VII of the UN Charter requires that there be a
threat to the peace or an act of aggression before the
Security Council can make use of its special powers set out
in that Chapter. It has always been interpreted to mean and
was meant to mean a threat to international peace not
national peace. The members of the Security Council
recognized this and so had to redefine a national problem
as an international one. Yet in all those speeches and
memoranda there is not one compelling reason given for
doing this except vague references to the collapse of the
socialist bloc, and the imperative to establish a new world
order. In fact, Mr. Genscher in his speech to the Canadian
parliament stated
unequivocally that no nation would any longer be allowed to
ignore Security Council decisions. Even if this redefinition
were a legitimate interpretation of the UN Charter, which it
is not, the UN Charter only speaks of economic measures
and then military measures, not judicial or criminal
measures.
Chapter VII has to be read in context with Chapter I of the
Charter which speaks of international cooperation in solving
international problems of an economic, social, cultural or
humanitarian character. It says nothing of humanitarian
problems of a national character. It states that the UN is
based on the principle of the sovereign equality of its
members, a fundamental principle of international law, and
the first guarantee of the right to self-determination of the
world's peoples. If a people does not have the right of
sovereignty, the right to self-determination is a sham. This
principle is completely denied by the creation of the
Tribunal. The Tribunal itself explicitly denies that this
principle applies in its own statements as do its political
supporters, but never, of course, in reference to
themselves.
Lastly, the Charter states that nothing contained in the
Charter shall authorize the UN to intervene in matters which
are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state.
This fundamental principle, put in the Charter so that the UN
could not be used by some members to bully others has
also been fatally undermined by the creation of the
Tribunal. The members of the Security Council, more
precisely, the permanent members, now hold the opposite
position, and I submit, do so for reasons connected more
with imperialism not humanitarianism.
In light of these facts the Security Council's authority to
create such a tribunal is in my view more than questionable.
That it was created is to be credited to Madeleine Albright,
who used some effective persuasion with the Russian and
Chinese members to vote for its creation in return for
economic consideration and with a view to controlling
smaller states within their own spheres of interest.
Yugoslavia was the first experiment in using a quasi-judicial
international body to attack the principle of sovereignty.
And as the Americans have learned so well, the best way
to get your domestic population behind you as you proceed
to break another country, economically and militarily is to
get them to hate those in power in that country. The Serb
leadership was targeted, and transformed into caricatures
of evil. There were comparisons to Adolf Hitler, a
comparison used with surprising frequency by the United
States against the long list of nations it has attacked in the
last 50 years, though sometimes they are just labeled as
common criminals, like Manuel Noriega, or mad, like
Ghadaffi, if the leader or the country is too small to make
the Hitler comparison stick. I think Saddam Hussein was
the first to be compared to Hitler, and declared a common
criminal and a madman all at the same time.
The Tribunal from the outset was
the creation of particular
governments. Their motives are clear from the
preliminary discussions in the Security Council on the
creation of the court which focused almost entirely on
crimes allegedly committed by Serbs and their leadership.
Since its inception it has kept this focus. The majority of
indictments have been directed at Serbs even though there
is substantial evidence of the commission of serious war
crimes by Croats and Bosnian Muslims.
The Tribunal has jurisdiction over war crimes and crimes
against humanity, but crimes against peace, the worst
crime under the Nuremberg principles, are not within the
purview of the tribunal. The underlying reason for this is that
the members of the Security Council preferred to reserve
to themselves competence in the field of aggression and
similar crimes against peace. The members of the Security
Council have a very keen sense of humour or perhaps more
accurately, self-preservation.
In a statement to the Secretary-General of the United
Nation, Mr. Boutros-boutros Ghali, on January 21, 1994, by
Antonio Cassese the Tribunal's political character was
made quite clear when he said in reference to the role of
the Tribunal, "The political and diplomatic response
(to the Balkans conflict) takes into account the exigencies
and the tempo of the international community. The military
response will come at the appropriate time." In other
words, the Tribunal is considered a political response. He
went on to state, "Our tribunal will not be simply "window
dressing" but a decisive step in the construction of a new
world order."
The governing statute of the Tribunal states in Article 16
that the Prosecutor shall act independently as a separate
organ of the Tribunal and shall not seek or receive
instruction from any government or any other source.
Article 32 states that the expenses of the Tribunal shall be
borne by the regular budget of the United Nations. Both of
these provisions have been openly and continuously
violated.
The Tribunal itself, through its senior officials, openly brags
about its particularly close ties to the American
government. In her remarks to the United States Supreme
Court in Washington, D.C. on April 5th of this year, Judge
Gabrielle Kirk Mcdonald, President of the Tribunal, and an
American stated, "We benefited from the strong support of
concerned governments and dedicated individuals such as
Secretary Albright. As the permanent representative to the
United Nations, she had worked with unceasing resolve to
establish the Tribunal. Indeed, we often refer to her as the
"mother of the Tribunal". If she is the mother then Bill
Clinton is the father, as Louise Arbour confirmed by her
action of reporting to the President of the United States the
decision to indict Milosevic two days before she announced
it to the rest of the world, in blatant violation of her duty to
remain independent. Further, she and the current
prosecutor have made several public appearances with U.S
officials, including Madeleine Albright, and both have openly
stated that they rely on Nato governments for
investigations, governments which have a great interest in
the undermining of the Yugoslavian leadership.
In 1996, the prosecutor met with the Secretary-General of
Nato and the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe to
"establish contacts and begin discussing modalities of
cooperation and Assistance". On May 9th, 1996 a
memorandum of understanding between the Office of the
Prosecutor and Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers
Europe (SHAPE) was signed by both parties. Further
meetings have taken place since including that of the
president of the Tribunal with General Wesley Clark. The
memorandum of May 9th spelled out the practical
arrangements for support to the tribunal and the transfer of
indicted persons to the Tribunal. In other words, Nato
forces became the gendarmes of the Tribunal, not UN
forces, and the Tribunal put itself at the disposal of Nato.
This relationship has continued despite the Tribunal's
requirement to be independent of any national government
and, therefore, group of national governments.
The Tribunal has received substantial funds from individual
States, private foundations and corporations in violation of
Article 32 of its Charter. Much of its money has come from
the U.S. government directly in cash and donations of
computer equipment. In the last year for which public
figures are available, 1994/95, the United States provided
$700,000 in cash and $2,300,000 worth of equipment. That
same year the Open Society Institute, a foundation
established by George Soros, the American billionaire
financier, to bring "openness" to the former east bloc
countries contributed $150,000 and the Rockefeller family,
through the Rockefeller Foundation, contributed $50,000
and there have been donations from corporations such as
Time-Warner, and Discovery Products, both US
corporations. It also important to know that Mr. Soros'
foundation not only funds the Tribunal it also funds the main
KLA newspaper in Pristina, an obvious conflict of interest
that has not been mentioned once in the western press.
The Tribunal also receives money from the United States
Institute for Peace for its Outreach project, a public
relations arm of the Tribunal set up to overcome opposition
in the former Yugoslav republics to its work and the
constant criticisms of selective prosecution and the
application of double standards; objections which have
obvious merit and which are never answered by anyone at
the Tribunal or by any of its sponsors. The Institute for
Peace is stated to be " an independent, non-partisan
federal institution created and funded by Congress to
strengthen the nation's capacity to promote the peaceful
resolution of international conflict." .Established in 1984
under Ronald Reagan, its Board of Directors
is appointed by the President of the United States.
The Tribunal also receives support from the Coalition For
International Justice whose purpose is also to enhance
public opinion of the Tribunal. The CIJ was founded and is
funded by, again, George Soros' Open Society Institute
and something called CEELI, the Central and East
European Law Institute, created by the American Bar
Association and lawyers close to the U.S. government to
promote the replacement of socialist legal systems with
free market ones.
These groups also have supplied many of the legal staff of
the Tribunal. In her speech to the Supreme Court, Judge
Mcdonald said, "The Tribunal has been well served by the
tremendous work of a number of lawyers who have come
to the Tribunal through the CIJ and CEELI..." It is also
interesting to note that the occasion of Judge McDonalds
speech was her acceptance of an award from the
American Bar Association and CEELI. In the same speech
she also said," We are now seeking funding from states
and foundations to carry out this critical effort."
The new prosecutor Carla Del Ponte, on September 30, at
a press conference, thanked the director of the FBI for
assisting the tribunal and stated "I am very appreciative of
the important support that the U.S government has
provided the tribunal. I look forward to their continued
support." OnSeptember 29th, in response to a question as
to whether the tribunal would be investigating crimes
Committed in Kosovo after June 10, or crimes committed
by others (meaning Nato) in the Yugoslav theatre of
operations, "The primary focus of the Office of The
Prosecutor must be on the investigation and prosecution of
the five leaders of the FRY and Serbia who have already
been indicted." Why this "must" be is not explained. Why, if
the Tribunal is impartial wouldn't it be just as focussed on
Nato war crimes, the war crimes of Clinton, Schroeder ,
Chirac, Chretien etc? Why did it still need to investigate to
support the indictments against the leaders of the
government and military of Yugoslavia if there was already
evidence to justify those indictments?
Well, we can speculate why when we consider that the last
prosecutor, Louis Arbour, who was asked to investigate all
Nato leaders for war crimes, instead accepted a job from
one of them, the Prime Minister of Canada, Jean Chretien.
She now sits in the scarlet robes of a judge of the Supreme
Court of Canada, a lifetime appointment, her reward for
handing down the indictment against Mr. Milosevic, despite
the lack of evidence and (if you believe the reports of the
Spanish and RCMP forensic experts recently returned from
Kosovo) the continuing lack of evidence of the systematic
crimes he is accused of.
On April 19th Judge McDonald "expressed her deep
appreciation to the U.S. Government for its pledge of
$500,000 for the Outreach project which was announced
on April 16 by Harold Koh, U.S. Assistant Secretary of
State.
In her speech to the Council On Foreign Relations in New
York on May 12 of this year Judge McDonald stated," The
U.S. government has very generously agreed to provide
$500,000 and to help to encourage other States to
contribute. However, the moral imperative to end the
violence in the region is shared by all, including the
corporate sector. I am pleased, therefore, that a major
corporation has recently donated computer equipment
worth three million dollars, which will substantially enhance
our operating capacity."
From the start, the Office of the Prosecutor has had
meetings with NGO's that are eager to " cooperate with
and assist the tribunal", many of them linked to George
Soros through his Open Society Foundation. All this money
flows through a special UN account which is financed by
assessed contributions from member states and voluntary
contributions from states and corporations again in violation
of its statute. As an aside it's interesting that its role as a
propaganda tool was indirectly acknowledged by its own
staff when they failed to provide for a courtroom or holding
cells in their first budget of approximately $ 32 million
dollars. The Security Council sent them back to redraft the
budget to include those items. After all, this was supposed
to be a criminal tribunal! They did so. The difference was
an added expense of $500,000. It's also interesting to
know that three of its first four rooms in the Peace Palace
in the Hague were loaned to them by the Carnegie
Foundation.
In order to give itself the appearance of a judicial body the
Tribunal has persons appointed as judges, prosecutors,
clerks, investigators, and has its own rules of procedure
and evidence, its own prison system. It says it applies the
presumption of innocence. However, unlike criminal
courts, with which we are all familiar (or, perhaps not), the
court itself is involved in the laying of the charges. When a
charge is to be laid the approval of one of the trial judges
must be obtained. That approval is only given if a prima
facie case is established. That is, a case which if not
answered could result in a conviction. Yet, despite this
close relationship between the prosecutor and the judges
and the commitment to the charges the judges have made
by signing the indictment , the rules insist on the
presumption of innocence. This presumption is
compromised in other ways. The most egregious is that
upon arrest detention is automatic. There is no bail, no form
of release pending trial, unless the prisoner proves
"exceptional circumstances". Loss of job, loss of contact
with friends, family, indeed country is not sufficient. Even ill
health has not been sufficient to get bail. Prisoners are
treated as if they had been convicted. They are kept in
cells and have to obey prison rules, are subject to discipline
if they do not, constant surveillance, censored mail,
restricted family visits, communication with family at their
own expense and there are restrictions on what they can
see or hear on radio or television. Prisoners have had to
wait many months before a trial takes place, sometimes
years. Yet, still they insist these men are presumed
innocent. The question is by whom? By the judges, one of
whom laid the charge in the first place?
Its rules of evidence are relaxed so that protections on the
admission of hearsay evidence developed over centuries in
all national courts are set aside and replaced by an
anything is admissible if deemed relevant approach even if
it is hearsay. There is no jury. Witnesses can testify
anonymously, or not be shown in court. In its yearbook for
1994, this statement appears, "The tribunal does not need
to shackle itself with restrictive rules which have developed
out of the ancient trial-by-jury system." There are provisions
in the rules for closed hearings, in circumstances which are
vaguely defined, secret trials, the very essence of injustice
and of political courts. It is now increasing its use of sealed
indictments, so that no one knows if they have been
charged until the military police swoop down on them on the
street in any country. Suspects, persons not indicted, can
be detained for up to ninety days without charge. We all
know from experience what prisoners can undergo in a day
or two at the mercy of most police forces. Ninety days.
Anyone one of us here could be detained by the Tribunal
for that length of time. All they have to say is they have
some reason to suspect you. This is easily constructed.
Perhaps its most dangerous rule
is Rule 92 that states confessions shall be
presumed to be free and voluntary unless the contrary is
established (by the prisoner). Just think - presumed to be
free and voluntary after 90 days at the mercy of military
police and prosecutors. Almost every other court in the
world presumes the opposite or, because of the notorious
unreliability of confessions made in police custody are
moving to prohibit their use entirely. This Tribunal goes
back to the days of Star Chamber and the justice of the
13th century. Finally, we have imprisonment of those
sentenced in foreign countries so that not only are they
imprisoned, they are at the same time exiled. There is even
a special provision for the obtaining of evidence from
NGO's such as George Soros Open Society Foundation,
whose conflict of interest has already been mentioned.
Accused have the right to choose counsel on paper but in
reality that right is infringed by the Registrar who can
disqualify counsel for all sorts of reasons including being
unfriendly to the Tribunal. Such a counsel will be supplied if
the accuses insists strongly enough but it is not made easy.
There are cases in which the Registrar has barred lawyers
from particular countries because there are deemed to be
too many of them already representing accused persons,
and the use of its contempt powers is a powerful weapon
to intimidate counsel. Lawyers have been subject to large
fines for contempt.
No citizen of any country in the world would consider
themselves fairly tried before a court that was paid for,
staffed and assisted by private citizens or corporations
which had a direct stake in the outcome of the trial and who
were, themselves, in practical terms, immune from that
court. It is a well established principle of law that a party in
a legal action, whether civil or criminal, is entitled to ask for
the removal of any judge sitting on the case when there
exists a reasonable apprehension of bias. In this instance,
a compelling argument can be made that the bias is not
only apprehended, it is real, that it is not of one judge but of
the entire tribunal, that this is not a judicial body worthy of
international respect but a kangaroo court, a bogus court,
with a political purpose serving very powerful and
identifiable masters. To be consistent with my thesis I will
go further and say that as a political instrument designed to
violate, to destroy, the integrity and sovereignty of a
country, its creation is a crime against peace under the
Nuremberg Principles. Instead of resolving conflict as it
claims, it is used to justify conflict, instead of creating
peace, it is used to justify war and therefore is an
instrument of war.
Will Slobodan Milosevic receive
a fair trial if they take him? Will the leaders of Nato,
even be investigated let alone indicted for war crimes
committed in the brutal attack on the civilian population of
Yugoslavia, as my colleagues in Canada, South and Central
America, Spain, Norway, Greece, Britain, and the United
States have requested? As the English say, the proof is in
the pudding. Our requests have met with empty words and
no action. We made the requests in order to bring to the
attention of the world the crimes that were being committed
by Nato. We believe we have succeeded in that. If we have
not succeeded in bringing to justice the war criminals of
Nato, it is because we have exposed the political nature of
this Tribunal instead. It is up to all of us to act on this
knowledge.
Christopher Black is a Toronto defence lawyer and writer
and is one of the lawyers who made the request to the War
Crimes Tribunal to indict NATO leaders for war
crimes.
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I gruppi di discussione + interessanti e divertenti!
Le liste + calde!!
Il meglio di eCircle!!!
http://www.ecircle.it/ad789403/www.listparade.it
...troviamo notizie su:
- il nazionalismo croato che alza la testa in Bosnia-Erzegovina
- Stipe Mesic che esalta un suo zio, opportunista che ha combattuto per
tutte le bandiere, compresa quella degli ustascia, come eroe di guerra
della II G. M.
- la Difesa territoriale slovena che si organizza...
- le modifiche costituzionali in Serbia, con la limitazione
dell'autonomia... della Vojvodina, e gli scioperi ed agitazioni tra i
secessionisti in Kosovo
- le prime strade della Croazia intitolate al cardinale nazista Stepinac
- altre curiosita'
(i giornali, da noi casualmente rinvenuti, sono copie di "POLITIKA" del
4, 20, 21 e 22 settembre 1990; traduzione a cura del Coordinamento
Romano per la
Jugoslavia - crj@...)
---
Sarajevo, 21.9.90.
Protest rukovodstva Bosne i Hercegovine
DRSKOST HRVATSKIH VRHOVNIKA JE NESHVATLJIVA
U tome se isticu posebno Dalibor Brozovic i Vladimir Seks. - Stipe Mesic
pretio u Listici.
Predsednistvo SR Bosne i Hercegovine uputilo je pismo Dr Franji
Tudjmanu, predsedniku Republike Hrvatske koje je potpisao Dr Obrad
Piljak.
U poslednje vreme, kaze se u pismu, sve je vise dogadjaja i skupova
politickih stranaka na teritoriji Bosne i Hercegovine koji se koriste
za slanje poruka i pretnji jedne republike drugoj. U to su ukljuceni,
kako se navodi, odgovorni funkcioneri u drzavnim organima Republike
Hrvatske.
O njihovom dolasku u SR BiH ne obavestavaju se odgovarajuci drzavni
organi ove Republike. Takvo njihovo ponasanje i pogotovo sadrzina vecine
njihovih istupa u tim prilikama dozivljava se kao negiranje suvereniteta
SR BiH i njene ravnopravnosti u Jugoslaviji.
Ko se posebno “istice”
U pismu se dalje kaze da se svojim istupanjima i iznosenjem mnogih
neprihvatljivih stavova ili slanjem pretnji najvise “istakao”
potpresednik Republike Hrvatske akademik dr Dalibor Brozovic. Posebno se
istice da je potpresednik Sabora Hrvatske Vladimir Seks takodje
nenajavljen boravio u Capljini ( ? !, n.d.t.) i to posle javnog
saopstenja sa zajednicke sednice Predsednistva Izvrsnog veca Skupstine i
odgovarajucih funkcionera Skupstine SR B i H, na kojoj su osudjene
navedene pojave dolazaka i delovanja na teritoriji SR BiH drzaavnih
funkcionera iz drugih republika bez znanja drzavnih organa ove
Republike. Predsednistvo SR BiH obavestava Tudjmana da je upoznato i sa
pismom koje je Republickom sekretarijatu za unutrasnje poslove BiH
uputio predsednik Sabora R. Hrvatske Vladimir Seks. Cudno je i
indikativno, glasi komentar Predsednistva sr BiH, da to pismo nije
upuceno preko nadleznih ili odgovarajucih drzavnih organa. Ovakvo
obracanje smatra se neprimerenim korespondiranjem ravnopravnih partnera
i organa dve suverene i ravnopravne republike.
“Hrvatski mladici” i terorizam
Pojedini navodi u tom pismu, kako smatraju clanovi Predsednistva SR BiH,
najblaze receno, zacudjuju.
Kako se moze reci da je recimo l972. Godine u zemlju ilegalno usla
“grupa hrvatskih mladica”, iako je i u svetu poznato da se radilo o
grupi dobro obucenih terorista, koji su u Jugoslaviju ubaceni sa ciljem
da oruzanim akcijama i masovnim ubijanjem ljudi izazovu haos u zemlji i
da sruse ustavni poredak, iako se zna da je u borbi sa njima poginulo i
13 jugoslovenskih gradjana. Ovakve tvrdnje mogu se okvalifikovati samo
kao neshvatljiva drskost.
Jos vecom drskoscu i provokacijom Predsednistvo SR BiH smatra u
pomenutom pismu da su oni likvidirani prilikom ulaska “u Republiku
Hrvatsku, gde je u Bugojnu....”To se smatra otvorenim prekajanjem
unutrasnjih granica u Jugoslaviji i izrazavanje pretenzija prema
teritorijama SR Bosne i Hercegovine negiranjem njenog suvereniteta.
TRADUZIONE
La protesta della leadership della Bosnia-Erzegovina
L’arroganza dei dirigenti croati e’ incomprensibile
In questo si distinguono particolarmente Dalibor Brozovic e Vladimir
Seks. La minaccia di Stipe Mesic a Listica.
Sarajevo, 21 settembre 1990
La presidenza della Repubblica Socialista di Bosnia-Erzegovina ha
indirizzato una lettera al dott. Franjo Tudjiman, presidente della
Repubblica di Croazia, che e’ stata firmata dal dott. Obrak Piljak.
Ultimamente, si dice nella lettera, sempre piu’ spesso avvengono fatti e
raduni dei partiti politici sul territorio della B.E., che vengono usati
per inviare messaggi e minacce da una Repubblica all’altra. In questo si
inseriscono, come viene detto nella lettera, funzionari responsabili
degli organi statali della Repubblica di Croazia.
Del loro arrivo nella R.S.B.E. non vengono informati gli organi statali
competenti di questa Repubblica. Questo loro comportamento e soprattutto
il contenuto della maggior parte dei loro comizi in queste occasioni
viene percepito come una negazione della sovranita’ della R.S.B.E., e
della suoi pari diritti all’interno della Jugoslavia.
Chi si “espone” di piu’
Nella lettera si afferma anche che tra chi si espone con posizioni
fortemente inaccettabili, oppure invia minacce, c’e’ in maniera
particolare il vicepresidente della Repubblica di Croazia, l’accademico
dott. Dalibor Brozovic. Si sottolinea soprattutto che il vicepresidente
del Sabor croato, Vladimir Seks, ha soggiornato - pur non essendo
invitato - a Capljina [cittadina della Erzegovina, dove si trova la
Scuola ufficiali dell’esercito, n.d.T.], e questo e’ avvenuto dopo
l’annuncio pubblico della riunione congiunta della Presidenza del
Consiglio esecutivo dell’Assemblea con i rispettivi funzionari
dell’Assemblea della R.S.B.E., nella quale sono stati condannati questi
ed altri casi simili di arrivi ed azioni di funzionari di altre
repubbliche sul territorio della R.S.B.E. senza che ne fossero informati
i competenti organi statali di questa Repubblica. La presidenza della
R.S.B.E. ha avvisato Tudjman di essere a conoscenza anche del contenuto
della lettera inviata dal Presidente del Sabor della Repubblica di
Croazia Vladimir Seks al Segretariato repubblicano per gli affari
interni della B.E. E’ curioso ed indicativo, si dice nel commento della
Presidenza della R.S.B.E., che questa lettera non e’ stata spedita
tramite gli organismi statali competenti o preposti. Questo modo di
interloquire per corrispondenza e’ ritenuto non appropriato tra due
partner, organi di due repubbliche sovrane e di pari diritti.
I “giovani croati” ed il terrorismo
Alcuni brani della succitata lettera, secondo i membri della Presidenza
della R.S.B.E., quantomeno sorprendono.
Come si puo’ dire, ad esempio, che nel 1972 nel paese e’ entrato
illegalmente un gruppo di “giovani croati”, benche’ tutto il mondo sa
che si trattava di un gruppo di terroristi molto bene addestrati che
sono stati introdotti in Jugoslavia allo scopo di compiere azioni
militari, uccisioni in massa di persone, per scatenare il caso nel
paese ed abbattere la Costituzione, malgrado si sappia che nello scontro
sono morti 13 cittadini jugoslavi. Queste affermazioni possono essere
considerate soltanto alla stregua di una prepotenza incomprensibile.
La Presidenza della R.S.B.E. ritiene essere di una prepotenza e
provocazione ancora piu’ grande il fatto che secondo la suddetta lettera
essi sarebbero stati liquidati all’ingresso “nel territorio della
Croazia, a Bugojno ...”. Questo si ritiene un vero cambiamento delle
frontiere interne della Jugoslavia, con dichiarate pretese nei confronti
del territorio della B.E., negando la sua sovranita’. E’ intollerabile
anche la prassi di abusare dell’ospitalita’, come e’ anche il caso
della minaccia ad un’altra Repubblica pronunciata da Stjepan Mesic,
allora Presidente del governo della Croazia, parlando a Listica.
Questi comportamenti di rilevanti funzionari statali della Repubblica di
Croazia, si dice nella lettera, sono in diretta contraddizione anche con
le posizioni unitarie raggiunte durante l’incontro nel quale si sono
analizzate le reciproche relazioni e la cooperazione futura, nella
conversazione tra le delegazioni delle due Repubbliche a Zagabria il 23
luglio di quest’anno.
A Tudjman si richiede che al fine di una ulteriore cooperazione
reciproca e paritaria, il rapporto e la condotta dei funzionari statali
della Repubblica di Croazia si coordinino in relazione agli accordi ed
alle prese di posizione di Tudjman, riguardanti lo status costituzionale
ed i diritti della R.S.B.E., in quanto repubblica sovrana, indipendente
e di pari diritti nella Repubblica di Jugoslavia.
Nella lettera indirizzata a Tudjman, inoltre, si dice : “Ci farebbe
molto piacere se non dovessimo intraprendere altri passi che potrebbero
influenzare ancor piu’ negativamente la cooperazione reciproca su basi
paritarie, il che e’ senz’altro nell’interesse di tutti i cittadini che
vivono nelle nostre Repubbliche.”
M.Duric
KOME SE TO PRIVIDJA GENERAL
U poslednjem broju “Narodna armija” donosi ko je, zapravo bio Marko J.
Mesic kome njegov
rodjak Stipe pripisuje cin generala i velica ga kao heroja.
A CHI SI FA APPARIRE COME GENERALE
L’ultimo numero di “Narodna Armija” riposta chi e’ stato effettivamente
Marko J. Mesic, a cui il suo parente Stipe aggiunge il grado di generale
e lo esalta come eroe.
Il nuovo numero di “Narodna armija” riporta il commento, sotto la
denominazione “A chi si fa apparire come generale”, in relazione
all’intervista fatta a Stjepan Mesic e pubblicata su “Borba” il 13
settembre. Mesic ha tra l’altro detto : “Mi mettono in relazione con il
generale ustascia Mesic, con il quale sono imparentato, e non si dice
che questo ufficiale dei domobrani [corpo collaborazionista dei tedeschi
durante la II G.M., n.d.T.] con la sua unita’ e’ passato a Stalingrado
dalla parte dell’Armata Sovietica, che alla fine della guerra e’
diventato ufficiale sovietico, e che la sua unita’ nello scontro con i
tedeschi e’ stata decimata.”
Chi era questo “generale sovietico” ? Nella risposta documentata
esclusivamente in base a documenti salvati, il commentatore di “Narodna
armija” scrive che Marko J. Mesic, con il grado di tenente-colonello,
solamente in quattro anni era riuscito (per suoi personali interessi) ad
adattarsi a quattro eserciti ideologicamente diversi. In tutto quel
tempo ha giurato fedelta’ a tutti loro, cambiando facilmente le bandiere
militari, i berretti, portando sfacciatamente anche l’aquila bianca
bicipite [stemma della Jugoslavia monarchica, n.d.T.], e distintivi
ustascia e nazistici, la stella dell’Armata Rossa, lo stemma dell’AVNOJ
[Consiglio Popolare Antifascista di Liberazione Nazionale, fondatore
della RFS di Jugoslavia, n.d.R.] ed il tricolore jugoslavo. Ha
comandato l’ottavo reggimento d’artiglieria dell’esercito jugoslavo,
sezione cannonieri, cioe’ i resti del 369.esimo reggimento rinforzato di
fanteria dell’NDH [stato fantoccio nazista croato di Pavelic, n.d.T.]
sul fronte orientale, e la prima brigata jugoslava dell’Esercito
Popolare di Liberazione formata in URSS, ed ha tradito ognuna di queste
unita’ quanto si trovava nel momento piu’ difficile, oppure esponendole
a perdite catastrofiche. Per sua colpa, da una unita’ di 1530 tra
soldati ed ufficiali, uno su tre ha perso la vita. Per 17 mesi di
combattimenti sul fronte orientale, prevalentemente nella composizione
di gruppi militari d’elite del gruppo dell’Armata sud della Wehrmacht,
e’ stato decorato con 4 onoreficenze - Pavelic lo ha decorato con
“l’ordine militare del trifoglio di ferro” di quarto grado, e poi di
secondo grado, con il diritto di intitolarsi “cavaliere”, mentre Hitler
con la Croce di ferro di secondo grado, e poi del primo ordine. Come
prescelto dell’NKVD, e senza alcuna consultazione con il nostro
Movimento Popolare di Liberazione, dal campo dei prigionieri di guerra
e’ stato inserito nel centro per l’addestramento, a 120 chilometri da
Mosca, come comandante di reparto, e poi della prima brigata jugoslava
dell’Esercito Popolare di Liberazione della Jugoslavia, formatasi in
URSS. La prima e l’unica battaglia che ha comandato fu condotta nel
1944 a Cacak dalla brigata a fianco della Armata Rossa. Qui, negli
scontri con i tedeschi, sono morti 539 soldati ed ufficiali, il che per
numero di perdite in una singola battaglia e’ un caso unico nella storia
dell’Esercito di Liberazione Popolare della Jugoslavia.
Del pessimo comportamento nelle battaglie tenuto dal tenente-colonello
Mesic , da parte dei suoi collaboratori, e di una parte degli ex
legionari, sono rimasti gli scritti di vari autori che descrivono questo
dramma, di prossima pubblicazione in una monografia di questa unita’.
Il comandante ed il capo del comando della 23.esima divisione, Miladin
Ivanovic e Rajko Tanaskovic, hanno proposto l’8 di novembre,nell’analisi
del comportamento della brigata in queste battaglie e nella
risistemazione delle file di scrivere quanto segue : “Che si ripulisca
quanto prima dagli elementi indesiderati e che si sostituisca una
grande parte dei quadri di comando. Ci si riferisce anche al
comandante di brigata, che si e’ dimostrato debole, pauroso,
sconcertato, disturbato e sfiduciato...” Dopo il ritiro della brigata
dal fronte, il tenente colonello Marko Mesic il 18 novembre con
decisione del comandante supremo, e’ stato rimosso dall’incarico di
comandante e spostato ad incarichi amministrativi del Comando
d’artiglieria.
Cosi’ si e’ spenta la stella militare di Marko Mesic, di padre Josip,
nato a Bjelovar. Da tenente-colonello dunque non ha fatto nemmeno un
passo avanti, soltanto forse nei propri desideri, ed ecco anche nei
pensieri di chi pretende che sia un eroe, esempio, oppure vittima, e lui
non merita di essere ne’ l’una, ne’ la seconda, ne’ la terza cosa,
scrive “Narodna armija”. (R.P.)
Odnos prema JNA u Sloveniji se pogorsava.
SLOVENCI BI DA SMENE KOMANDANTA TERITORIJALNE ODBRANE
Namerno zanemaruju cinjenicu da je ta funkcija u nadleznosti Saveznog
sekretarijata za narodnu odbranu.
Il comportamento degli sloveni verso l’EPJ sta peggiorando.
GLI SLOVENI VORREBBERO SOSTITUIRE IL COMANDANTE DELLA DIFESA
TERRITORIALE
Di proposito stanno trascurando il fatto che questa funzione è di
competenza del Segretariato federale per la difesa popolare.
Maribor, 21 settembre l990
In Slovenia non desistono dalla soluzione di sostituire forzatamente il
Comandante della Difesa territoriale, Ivan Hocevar.
Questo comandante non è di loro gradimento a causa della sua aperta
posizione jugoslava, il che ha dimostrato esplicitamente anche nel caso
quando dal Segretariato federale per la difesa nazionale è stato
ordinato che le armi della DT vengano tolte e conservate meglio e più
sicuro nei magazzini militari.
Il nuovo attacco contro il generale Hocevar è arrivato ieri dalle file
del PRTITO Socialista della Slovenia. In esso si contesta a questo
ufficiale”perché non ha ordinato che le armi dal magazzino vengono usate
per le manovre della DT” . Gli viene contestato perché non hs consentito
che ha proibito all’uso delle manovre che in questo contesto sono
pianificate dalla RS della Slovenia, cioè da i suoi dirigenti.
Nella pubblica dichiarazione ufficiale, il Partito socialista tra
l’altro dichiara che ; le manovre della DT in Slovenia saranno
effettuate esclusivamente in base agli ordini dei dirigenti di questa
repubblica, cioè dagli organi competenti. Ciò comporta alla necessità di
nominare un nuovo comandante della DT della Slovenia da parte dei suoi
dirigenti, cioè che questa funzione venga tolta dalla competenza del
Segretariato federale per la difesa jugoslava.
Questo, come anche la chiara politica riguardo le reclute, espressa da
questa repubblica, dimostra che la Slovenia conforme ai suoi piani
confederali, vuole quanto prima l’intera problematica della difesa
nazionale prendere nelle proprie mani, con il che gli organi competenti
della difesa federale come pure la dirigenza della Jugoslavia erano
precedentemente informati.
Perciò, secondo il parere del Partito socialista di questa repubblica,
che in totale esprime le posizioni della dirigenza della Slovenia “il
comportamento del generale Hocevar, ulteriromente aggrava la relazione
della Slovenia con l’EPJ, e con che viene negata la sovranità della
Slovenia, la sua Assemblea e Presidenza”. Tutto ciò, si dice
ulteriormente nella dichiarazione, si crea l’impressione che in Slovenia
c’è una situazione esplosiva (d’incidente).
(S. Petrovic)
Pucnikovo pismo Kucanu
Predsednik vladajuce koalicije u Sloveniji Demos, Joze Pucnik, uputio
je otvoreno pismo Milanu Kucanu u kojem ga optuzuje za neodlucnost u
slucaju oduzimanja i vracanja oruzja teritorijalne odbrane Slovenije.
Lettera aperta di Joze Pucnik, al presidente sloveno Milan Kucan
Ljubljana, 21 settembre
Il presidente della coalizione governativa slovena Demos, Joze Pucnik,
ha inviato una lettera aperta di protesta al presidente della Repubblica
Milan Kucan, nella quale lo accusa per la sua indecisione nel caso della
sottrazione e la restituzione delle armi alla DT della Slovenia.
Sednica Ustavne komisije Vojvodine
PRIHVACEN PREDLOG USTAVA SRBIJE
Novi Ustav omogucit ce svestrani dmokratski razvoj Republike.
Novi Sad, 21 settembre (Tanjug)
La commissione per le questioni costituzionali del Parlamento
SAP(Regione autonoma socialista) della Vojvodina, nella seduta odierna
presieduta dalla presidentessa del Parlamento Verona Adam-Bokros, ha
esaminato e, dopo un dibattito di più ore, ha appoggiato il Decreto
della Costituzione della Repubblica di Serbia.
Alla seduta di questa commissione hanno partecipato alla discussione e
hanno risposto alle molteplici domande i membri della Presidenza della
RS di Serbia e al contempo i membri della Commissione costituzionale
della RS di Serbia Slobodan Vucetic e il dr. Jurij Bajec.
Con il varo della nuova Costituzione, ha dichiarato Verona Adam-Bokros,
si creano le basi per il funzionamento della Repubblica di Serbia come
stato sovrano e moderno. Le risoluzioni proposte esprimono completamente
l’impegno perché la nuova Costituzione renda possibile uno sviluppo
democratico generale della Repubblica di Serbia come una comunità
moderna e democratica inserita nella RSF di Jugoslavia, e anche la
possibilità per uno sviluppo indipendente della Repubblica di Serbia nel
caso in cui non si raggiunga un accordo tra i popoli jugoslavi in una
vita comune nella Jugoslavia federativa.
S Vucetic ha dato ampie motivazioni di alcune decisioni e ha risposto
insieme a Jurij Bajec a molte domande ed anche alle osservazioni
critiche dei membri della Commissione costituzionale della Vojvodina.
Egli ha particolarmente posto attenzione al fatto che anche di fronte ad
una richiesta massiccia di cambiare il termine “nazionalità” nella
Costituzione inserendo il termine “minoranza”, si sia rimasti all’idea
di “nazionalità”, che ha già acquistato il suo pieno significato
soprattutto nella multietnica Vojvodina, il che è anche in conformità
con la Costituzione della RSFJ.
Egli ha smentito le speculazioni e le affermazioni infondate sul
concedere troppo potere al Presidente della Repubblica di Serbia,
sottolineando che l’Assemblea della Repubblica di Serbia ha, come
maggiore organo di governo, un’autorità sia costituzionale che
legislativa, cosicché non si prenda in considerazione nemmeno
l’introduzione di un sistema presidenziale nella repubblica.
JEDNA ULICA U DUBROVNIKU DOBIJA IME ALOJZIJA STEPINCA
Dubrovnik 21 settembre 1990
UNA STRADA A DUBROVNIK PRENDE IL NOME DI ALOJZIJE STEPINAC...
Da "Politika" 4 settembre l990
Pristina ; "Strajk nije uspeo"
Osujecena namera separatista da paralisu zivot na Kosmetu. Republicki
organi Srbije obezbedili normalno funkcioniosanje svih vitalnih funkcija
i snabdevanje gradjana prehrambenim proizvodima.
Danas od separatistickog vrha naredjen i zapocet t.zv. 24. Casovni
generalni strajk Albanaca na Kosovu pretvorio se u poraz sovinista i
separatista......Dok su sve prodavaonice "Mehanizacije" radile, najdalje
u strajku otisli su radnici i rukovodioci, Albanci trgovinskog preduzeca
"Vocar", jer najveci broj prodavaonica nije ni otvoren.
Prvih dana nastava u skolama se odvijala na srpskom, turskom i romskom
jeziku , jer ucenici Albanci nisu ni dosli u skole .
Pristina, 4 settembre : "Lo sciopero non riuscito"
Sventato il tentativo dei separatisti di paralizzare la vita nel Kosovo
e Metohija. Gli organi repubblicani della Serbia hanno assicurato il
funzionamento normale delle funzioni vitali e il rifornimento dei
prodotti alimentari .
Oggi e stato ordinato dai lider separatisti ed è iniziato il cosiddetto
sciopero di 24 ore. Lo sciopero generale degli albanesi nel Kosmet si è
concluso con una sconfitta dei sciovinisti e separatisti... Mentre tutti
i negozi della società "Mehanizacija" sono rimasti aperti, i negozi
della catena alimentare "Vocar", la maggior parte , non hanno aperto.
Postoji li skrivena bolnica ? Veci broj Albanaca nije dosao na
posao. Zene tek sto su se porodile ostavljaju bolnicu. Nestale velike
kolicine lekova.
n Turska salje trupe u Zaljev.
n Gorbacov i Bush pred Branembourskom kapijom. Nemci bi zeleli da
trenutke velike nacionalne radosti podele sa svetom.
n Povlacenje vojske SSSR. Sovjetska armija ima 380.000 vojnika, 160
velikih kasarni, 50.000 oficirskih stanova, 30 aerodroma i 40 poligona.
Protest sovjetskih oficira u garnizonu kod
n Magdenbourga zbog naredbe o skorom povlacenju.
n Ispraviti nepravde nanete Srbiji i srpskom narodu. Novobeogradjani
upoznati sa programom SPS-a.
n Pitanje : Dali ce u Ustavu Srbije sluzbeni jezik biti srpskohrvatski
kao do sada ili srpski, pita Nikola Mrdjan. Srpskohrvatskim jezikom, po
recima Djoke Stojicica, govore 4 naroda - Srbi, Hrvati, Crnogorci i
Muslimani... U sustini to je jedan jezik. Akcije za podelu jezika
ustvari su podle namere da se narodi podele. To je jos krajem sezdesetih
godina u Hrvatskoj sproveo V. Bakaric. On je ustvari odobrio da u
Hrvatskoj u zvanicnoj upotrebi bude hrvatski knjizevni jezik. Sada je
nazalost u Ustavu Hrvatske izbrisan srpski jezik.
......Igra sa terminima, po recima Djoke Stojicica, nimalo nije
naivna. Recimo Siptari na Kosovu su se svojim imenom "sinovi orlova"
ponosili do l968, a onda im je nametnut naziv Albanci. Nazalost oni se
ne upisuju kao jugoslavenski Albanci, vec samo kao Albanci. To znaci
pripadanje Albaniji a en Jugoslaviji. Po onom sto se u svetu priznaje,
oni mogu da budu samo nacionalna manjina. Slicnu igru sada igra SDA u
Sandzaku. Fundamentalisti hoce da su Turci, a zna se da su Muslimani
slovenskog porekla i da govore srpskim jezikom.
U Priboju posle skupstine SDA. Pucalo se na srpsku decu. Zitelji
grada Lima odrzali zbor trazeci ostavke opstinskog rukovodstva koje je
dozvolilo da se osnivacka skupstina SDA obavi u centru grada.
Mr Borisav Radjenovic : "Veliki si posao ucinio za Tudjmana".
Otvoreno pismo Simi Rajicu, potpresedniku Sabora Hrvatske.
Knin : Osnovci nisu posli u skolu. Zbog neizvesne i napete
politicke situacije u Kninskoj krajini danas nije pocela najavljena
nastava u osnovnim skolama. Sindikat prosvetnih radnika, roditelji i
aktivisti Srpske demokratske stranke poslednjih meseci u nekoliko
navrata najavljivali bojkot nastave zbog kroatocentricnih udzbenika i
nastavnih programa. Zbgo bojazni roditelja, naocito onih cija deca
putuju do skole, opstinske prosvetne vlasti odlozili su pocetak nove
skolske godine. Pretprosle noci svi prilazi Kninu blokirani.
Najavljen protestni miting Srba u Sibeniku.
Srbi u Hrvatskoj bili bi srecni da imaju prava Albanaca na Kosmetu,
rekao je Mihajlo Markovic na predstavljanju SPS u Nisu.
Nije rec o niokakvoj zloupotrebi ljudskih prava Albanaca na Kosovu,
vec o stogodisnjoj zelji da se stvori Velika Albanija.... Radovali
bi se i Baski u Spaniji, i Madjari u Rumuniji.....Na Kosmetu se pokusava
da se na jugoslavenskoj, srpskoj teritoriji stvori jos jedna drzava
Albanija. Na zalost ovakve teznje podrzavaju se od Vatikana,
Habzburgovaca, muslimanskih organizacija, a u poslednje vreme i od SAD-a
Iz Amerike se preti kako ce Kongres biti jos restriktivniji u odnosu na
Srbiju i Jugoslaviju i kako nas nece vise pomagati. Time nas ne mogu
uplasiti. Zahvaljujemo im na pomoci koju su nam pruzili pedesetih
godina, ali ono sto su ucinili sedamdesetih, kada smo dobili 20
milijardi dolara, da bi samo kroz kamate do sada morali da platimo 40
milijardi i da nam pri tom ostane dug od 16 milijardi, pre bi se moglo
nazvati pljackom nego pomoci.
U velikoj dvorani Studentskog centra u Zagrebu, "Orlovi" i
"Jastrebovi" u istom jatu. Dajuci podrsku strajku separatista na Kosovu,
hrvatski nacionalisti su se juce obracali okupljernim Albancima pozivom
: "Ustanite braco !"
Doktor Slobodan Lang posti na Trgu Marsala Tita u Zagrebu. Skup
otvorio Ivan Zvonimir Cicak na "zdencu zivota"
Cudna promocija na Sirokom Brijegu. Novi "crnokosuljasi" u stroju.
Makedonija : Dramaticno saopstenje sa preksinocne sednice
Izvrsnog veca sobranja SR Makedonije. Ozbiljno naruseni politicki zivot
i bezbedno stanje u Makedoniji. Jednonacionalna siptarska organizacija,
Partija za demokratski prosperitet, poznata po separatistickim
ciljevima, namece se kao pandan i paralelna vlast legalnim drzavnim
organima. U svom delovanju VMRO -DRMNJ upotrebljava teroristicke metode
linca.
Makedonija - poligon siptarskog separatistickog delovanja kosovske
alternative.
Sejanje straha medju Makedoncima i cestitim Siptarima.
Su Ante Markovic
Krajnje je kontroverzna pojava stranke Ante Mrkovica na
politickoj sceni. Premijer se navodno zalaze za depolitizaciju uprave, a
osniva stranku vlade. Nada se kako rece Mileta Gajic, da ce privuci
siroke mase, a u stvari sprovodi takvu politiku da radnici ne mogu da
poele zaradjeno, a poljoprivrednici da naplateproizvedeno i to po
realnoj sceni.
Sa autorom neobicne knjige o Sumaricama : "Zapisi sa stratista".
Petar Lubarda : Ima li stravicnijeg prizora za ljudske oci od
dece na koju pucaju...". Jean Paul Sartre : "Najbolji utisak koji
stranac moze da ponese iz jedne zemlje, to je bo l koju oseti u toj
zemlji".
"Politika", 22. Septembar 1990.
Na zahtev Okruznog javnog tuzilastva Pristine.
OPTUZENA GRUPA BIVSIH FUNKCIONERA KOSOVA
Zbog osnovane sumnje da su izvrsili krivicno delo udruzivanja radi
neprijateljske delatnosti i ugrozavanja teritorijalne celine SR Srbije
pokrenuta je istraga protiv Juzufa Zejnulahua,Seljadina Skeje, Muhameta
Bicaja, Jusufa Karakusija, Leka Vuksanija, Ise Mustafe i Agima Malje.
Pristina, 21.9.l990.
Okruzni sud u Pristini saopstio je danas da je na zahtev Okruznog javnog
tuzilastva doneo resenje o sprovodjenju istrage protiv sestorice bivsih
clanova Izvrsnog veca Kosova i direktora Radio Televizije Pristina
kojima stavlja na teret da su obrazovali grupu sa ciljem da se
protivustavnim putem izmene granice SR Srbije i Kosovo proglasi
republikom.
U saopstenju se navodi da je istraga pokrenuta protiv Jusufa Zejnulahua,
bivseg predsednika Izvrsnog veca Skupstine SAP Kosovo, Seljadina Skeje,
bivseg sekretara za saobracaj i veze, Muhameta Bicaja, bivseg sekretara
za obrazovanje, nauku i kulturu, Jusufa Karakusija, bivseg pokrajinskog
sekretara za unutrasnje poslove, Leka Vuksanija, bivseg pokrajinskog
sekretara za rad, zdravstvo i socijalnu politiku, Ise Mustafe, bivseg
clana Izvrsnog veca Kosova, kao i Agima Mlaje, bivseg direktora
Radio-televizije Pristina.
Pec, 21.9.90.
Zahtev za smenjivanje predsednika Skupstine opstine, Muhameda
Corkadiju, i Izvrsnog veca SO Pec, Aleksandra Grujica.
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I gruppi di discussione + interessanti e divertenti!
Le liste + calde!!
Il meglio di eCircle!!!
http://www.ecircle.it/ad789403/www.listparade.it
- il nazionalismo croato che alza la testa in Bosnia-Erzegovina
- Stipe Mesic che esalta un suo zio, opportunista che ha combattuto per
tutte le bandiere, compresa quella degli ustascia, come eroe di guerra
della II G. M.
- la Difesa territoriale slovena che si organizza...
- le modifiche costituzionali in Serbia, con la limitazione
dell'autonomia... della Vojvodina, e gli scioperi ed agitazioni tra i
secessionisti in Kosovo
- le prime strade della Croazia intitolate al cardinale nazista Stepinac
- altre curiosita'
(i giornali, da noi casualmente rinvenuti, sono copie di "POLITIKA" del
4, 20, 21 e 22 settembre 1990; traduzione a cura del Coordinamento
Romano per la
Jugoslavia - crj@...)
---
Sarajevo, 21.9.90.
Protest rukovodstva Bosne i Hercegovine
DRSKOST HRVATSKIH VRHOVNIKA JE NESHVATLJIVA
U tome se isticu posebno Dalibor Brozovic i Vladimir Seks. - Stipe Mesic
pretio u Listici.
Predsednistvo SR Bosne i Hercegovine uputilo je pismo Dr Franji
Tudjmanu, predsedniku Republike Hrvatske koje je potpisao Dr Obrad
Piljak.
U poslednje vreme, kaze se u pismu, sve je vise dogadjaja i skupova
politickih stranaka na teritoriji Bosne i Hercegovine koji se koriste
za slanje poruka i pretnji jedne republike drugoj. U to su ukljuceni,
kako se navodi, odgovorni funkcioneri u drzavnim organima Republike
Hrvatske.
O njihovom dolasku u SR BiH ne obavestavaju se odgovarajuci drzavni
organi ove Republike. Takvo njihovo ponasanje i pogotovo sadrzina vecine
njihovih istupa u tim prilikama dozivljava se kao negiranje suvereniteta
SR BiH i njene ravnopravnosti u Jugoslaviji.
Ko se posebno “istice”
U pismu se dalje kaze da se svojim istupanjima i iznosenjem mnogih
neprihvatljivih stavova ili slanjem pretnji najvise “istakao”
potpresednik Republike Hrvatske akademik dr Dalibor Brozovic. Posebno se
istice da je potpresednik Sabora Hrvatske Vladimir Seks takodje
nenajavljen boravio u Capljini ( ? !, n.d.t.) i to posle javnog
saopstenja sa zajednicke sednice Predsednistva Izvrsnog veca Skupstine i
odgovarajucih funkcionera Skupstine SR B i H, na kojoj su osudjene
navedene pojave dolazaka i delovanja na teritoriji SR BiH drzaavnih
funkcionera iz drugih republika bez znanja drzavnih organa ove
Republike. Predsednistvo SR BiH obavestava Tudjmana da je upoznato i sa
pismom koje je Republickom sekretarijatu za unutrasnje poslove BiH
uputio predsednik Sabora R. Hrvatske Vladimir Seks. Cudno je i
indikativno, glasi komentar Predsednistva sr BiH, da to pismo nije
upuceno preko nadleznih ili odgovarajucih drzavnih organa. Ovakvo
obracanje smatra se neprimerenim korespondiranjem ravnopravnih partnera
i organa dve suverene i ravnopravne republike.
“Hrvatski mladici” i terorizam
Pojedini navodi u tom pismu, kako smatraju clanovi Predsednistva SR BiH,
najblaze receno, zacudjuju.
Kako se moze reci da je recimo l972. Godine u zemlju ilegalno usla
“grupa hrvatskih mladica”, iako je i u svetu poznato da se radilo o
grupi dobro obucenih terorista, koji su u Jugoslaviju ubaceni sa ciljem
da oruzanim akcijama i masovnim ubijanjem ljudi izazovu haos u zemlji i
da sruse ustavni poredak, iako se zna da je u borbi sa njima poginulo i
13 jugoslovenskih gradjana. Ovakve tvrdnje mogu se okvalifikovati samo
kao neshvatljiva drskost.
Jos vecom drskoscu i provokacijom Predsednistvo SR BiH smatra u
pomenutom pismu da su oni likvidirani prilikom ulaska “u Republiku
Hrvatsku, gde je u Bugojnu....”To se smatra otvorenim prekajanjem
unutrasnjih granica u Jugoslaviji i izrazavanje pretenzija prema
teritorijama SR Bosne i Hercegovine negiranjem njenog suvereniteta.
TRADUZIONE
La protesta della leadership della Bosnia-Erzegovina
L’arroganza dei dirigenti croati e’ incomprensibile
In questo si distinguono particolarmente Dalibor Brozovic e Vladimir
Seks. La minaccia di Stipe Mesic a Listica.
Sarajevo, 21 settembre 1990
La presidenza della Repubblica Socialista di Bosnia-Erzegovina ha
indirizzato una lettera al dott. Franjo Tudjiman, presidente della
Repubblica di Croazia, che e’ stata firmata dal dott. Obrak Piljak.
Ultimamente, si dice nella lettera, sempre piu’ spesso avvengono fatti e
raduni dei partiti politici sul territorio della B.E., che vengono usati
per inviare messaggi e minacce da una Repubblica all’altra. In questo si
inseriscono, come viene detto nella lettera, funzionari responsabili
degli organi statali della Repubblica di Croazia.
Del loro arrivo nella R.S.B.E. non vengono informati gli organi statali
competenti di questa Repubblica. Questo loro comportamento e soprattutto
il contenuto della maggior parte dei loro comizi in queste occasioni
viene percepito come una negazione della sovranita’ della R.S.B.E., e
della suoi pari diritti all’interno della Jugoslavia.
Chi si “espone” di piu’
Nella lettera si afferma anche che tra chi si espone con posizioni
fortemente inaccettabili, oppure invia minacce, c’e’ in maniera
particolare il vicepresidente della Repubblica di Croazia, l’accademico
dott. Dalibor Brozovic. Si sottolinea soprattutto che il vicepresidente
del Sabor croato, Vladimir Seks, ha soggiornato - pur non essendo
invitato - a Capljina [cittadina della Erzegovina, dove si trova la
Scuola ufficiali dell’esercito, n.d.T.], e questo e’ avvenuto dopo
l’annuncio pubblico della riunione congiunta della Presidenza del
Consiglio esecutivo dell’Assemblea con i rispettivi funzionari
dell’Assemblea della R.S.B.E., nella quale sono stati condannati questi
ed altri casi simili di arrivi ed azioni di funzionari di altre
repubbliche sul territorio della R.S.B.E. senza che ne fossero informati
i competenti organi statali di questa Repubblica. La presidenza della
R.S.B.E. ha avvisato Tudjman di essere a conoscenza anche del contenuto
della lettera inviata dal Presidente del Sabor della Repubblica di
Croazia Vladimir Seks al Segretariato repubblicano per gli affari
interni della B.E. E’ curioso ed indicativo, si dice nel commento della
Presidenza della R.S.B.E., che questa lettera non e’ stata spedita
tramite gli organismi statali competenti o preposti. Questo modo di
interloquire per corrispondenza e’ ritenuto non appropriato tra due
partner, organi di due repubbliche sovrane e di pari diritti.
I “giovani croati” ed il terrorismo
Alcuni brani della succitata lettera, secondo i membri della Presidenza
della R.S.B.E., quantomeno sorprendono.
Come si puo’ dire, ad esempio, che nel 1972 nel paese e’ entrato
illegalmente un gruppo di “giovani croati”, benche’ tutto il mondo sa
che si trattava di un gruppo di terroristi molto bene addestrati che
sono stati introdotti in Jugoslavia allo scopo di compiere azioni
militari, uccisioni in massa di persone, per scatenare il caso nel
paese ed abbattere la Costituzione, malgrado si sappia che nello scontro
sono morti 13 cittadini jugoslavi. Queste affermazioni possono essere
considerate soltanto alla stregua di una prepotenza incomprensibile.
La Presidenza della R.S.B.E. ritiene essere di una prepotenza e
provocazione ancora piu’ grande il fatto che secondo la suddetta lettera
essi sarebbero stati liquidati all’ingresso “nel territorio della
Croazia, a Bugojno ...”. Questo si ritiene un vero cambiamento delle
frontiere interne della Jugoslavia, con dichiarate pretese nei confronti
del territorio della B.E., negando la sua sovranita’. E’ intollerabile
anche la prassi di abusare dell’ospitalita’, come e’ anche il caso
della minaccia ad un’altra Repubblica pronunciata da Stjepan Mesic,
allora Presidente del governo della Croazia, parlando a Listica.
Questi comportamenti di rilevanti funzionari statali della Repubblica di
Croazia, si dice nella lettera, sono in diretta contraddizione anche con
le posizioni unitarie raggiunte durante l’incontro nel quale si sono
analizzate le reciproche relazioni e la cooperazione futura, nella
conversazione tra le delegazioni delle due Repubbliche a Zagabria il 23
luglio di quest’anno.
A Tudjman si richiede che al fine di una ulteriore cooperazione
reciproca e paritaria, il rapporto e la condotta dei funzionari statali
della Repubblica di Croazia si coordinino in relazione agli accordi ed
alle prese di posizione di Tudjman, riguardanti lo status costituzionale
ed i diritti della R.S.B.E., in quanto repubblica sovrana, indipendente
e di pari diritti nella Repubblica di Jugoslavia.
Nella lettera indirizzata a Tudjman, inoltre, si dice : “Ci farebbe
molto piacere se non dovessimo intraprendere altri passi che potrebbero
influenzare ancor piu’ negativamente la cooperazione reciproca su basi
paritarie, il che e’ senz’altro nell’interesse di tutti i cittadini che
vivono nelle nostre Repubbliche.”
M.Duric
KOME SE TO PRIVIDJA GENERAL
U poslednjem broju “Narodna armija” donosi ko je, zapravo bio Marko J.
Mesic kome njegov
rodjak Stipe pripisuje cin generala i velica ga kao heroja.
A CHI SI FA APPARIRE COME GENERALE
L’ultimo numero di “Narodna Armija” riposta chi e’ stato effettivamente
Marko J. Mesic, a cui il suo parente Stipe aggiunge il grado di generale
e lo esalta come eroe.
Il nuovo numero di “Narodna armija” riporta il commento, sotto la
denominazione “A chi si fa apparire come generale”, in relazione
all’intervista fatta a Stjepan Mesic e pubblicata su “Borba” il 13
settembre. Mesic ha tra l’altro detto : “Mi mettono in relazione con il
generale ustascia Mesic, con il quale sono imparentato, e non si dice
che questo ufficiale dei domobrani [corpo collaborazionista dei tedeschi
durante la II G.M., n.d.T.] con la sua unita’ e’ passato a Stalingrado
dalla parte dell’Armata Sovietica, che alla fine della guerra e’
diventato ufficiale sovietico, e che la sua unita’ nello scontro con i
tedeschi e’ stata decimata.”
Chi era questo “generale sovietico” ? Nella risposta documentata
esclusivamente in base a documenti salvati, il commentatore di “Narodna
armija” scrive che Marko J. Mesic, con il grado di tenente-colonello,
solamente in quattro anni era riuscito (per suoi personali interessi) ad
adattarsi a quattro eserciti ideologicamente diversi. In tutto quel
tempo ha giurato fedelta’ a tutti loro, cambiando facilmente le bandiere
militari, i berretti, portando sfacciatamente anche l’aquila bianca
bicipite [stemma della Jugoslavia monarchica, n.d.T.], e distintivi
ustascia e nazistici, la stella dell’Armata Rossa, lo stemma dell’AVNOJ
[Consiglio Popolare Antifascista di Liberazione Nazionale, fondatore
della RFS di Jugoslavia, n.d.R.] ed il tricolore jugoslavo. Ha
comandato l’ottavo reggimento d’artiglieria dell’esercito jugoslavo,
sezione cannonieri, cioe’ i resti del 369.esimo reggimento rinforzato di
fanteria dell’NDH [stato fantoccio nazista croato di Pavelic, n.d.T.]
sul fronte orientale, e la prima brigata jugoslava dell’Esercito
Popolare di Liberazione formata in URSS, ed ha tradito ognuna di queste
unita’ quanto si trovava nel momento piu’ difficile, oppure esponendole
a perdite catastrofiche. Per sua colpa, da una unita’ di 1530 tra
soldati ed ufficiali, uno su tre ha perso la vita. Per 17 mesi di
combattimenti sul fronte orientale, prevalentemente nella composizione
di gruppi militari d’elite del gruppo dell’Armata sud della Wehrmacht,
e’ stato decorato con 4 onoreficenze - Pavelic lo ha decorato con
“l’ordine militare del trifoglio di ferro” di quarto grado, e poi di
secondo grado, con il diritto di intitolarsi “cavaliere”, mentre Hitler
con la Croce di ferro di secondo grado, e poi del primo ordine. Come
prescelto dell’NKVD, e senza alcuna consultazione con il nostro
Movimento Popolare di Liberazione, dal campo dei prigionieri di guerra
e’ stato inserito nel centro per l’addestramento, a 120 chilometri da
Mosca, come comandante di reparto, e poi della prima brigata jugoslava
dell’Esercito Popolare di Liberazione della Jugoslavia, formatasi in
URSS. La prima e l’unica battaglia che ha comandato fu condotta nel
1944 a Cacak dalla brigata a fianco della Armata Rossa. Qui, negli
scontri con i tedeschi, sono morti 539 soldati ed ufficiali, il che per
numero di perdite in una singola battaglia e’ un caso unico nella storia
dell’Esercito di Liberazione Popolare della Jugoslavia.
Del pessimo comportamento nelle battaglie tenuto dal tenente-colonello
Mesic , da parte dei suoi collaboratori, e di una parte degli ex
legionari, sono rimasti gli scritti di vari autori che descrivono questo
dramma, di prossima pubblicazione in una monografia di questa unita’.
Il comandante ed il capo del comando della 23.esima divisione, Miladin
Ivanovic e Rajko Tanaskovic, hanno proposto l’8 di novembre,nell’analisi
del comportamento della brigata in queste battaglie e nella
risistemazione delle file di scrivere quanto segue : “Che si ripulisca
quanto prima dagli elementi indesiderati e che si sostituisca una
grande parte dei quadri di comando. Ci si riferisce anche al
comandante di brigata, che si e’ dimostrato debole, pauroso,
sconcertato, disturbato e sfiduciato...” Dopo il ritiro della brigata
dal fronte, il tenente colonello Marko Mesic il 18 novembre con
decisione del comandante supremo, e’ stato rimosso dall’incarico di
comandante e spostato ad incarichi amministrativi del Comando
d’artiglieria.
Cosi’ si e’ spenta la stella militare di Marko Mesic, di padre Josip,
nato a Bjelovar. Da tenente-colonello dunque non ha fatto nemmeno un
passo avanti, soltanto forse nei propri desideri, ed ecco anche nei
pensieri di chi pretende che sia un eroe, esempio, oppure vittima, e lui
non merita di essere ne’ l’una, ne’ la seconda, ne’ la terza cosa,
scrive “Narodna armija”. (R.P.)
Odnos prema JNA u Sloveniji se pogorsava.
SLOVENCI BI DA SMENE KOMANDANTA TERITORIJALNE ODBRANE
Namerno zanemaruju cinjenicu da je ta funkcija u nadleznosti Saveznog
sekretarijata za narodnu odbranu.
Il comportamento degli sloveni verso l’EPJ sta peggiorando.
GLI SLOVENI VORREBBERO SOSTITUIRE IL COMANDANTE DELLA DIFESA
TERRITORIALE
Di proposito stanno trascurando il fatto che questa funzione è di
competenza del Segretariato federale per la difesa popolare.
Maribor, 21 settembre l990
In Slovenia non desistono dalla soluzione di sostituire forzatamente il
Comandante della Difesa territoriale, Ivan Hocevar.
Questo comandante non è di loro gradimento a causa della sua aperta
posizione jugoslava, il che ha dimostrato esplicitamente anche nel caso
quando dal Segretariato federale per la difesa nazionale è stato
ordinato che le armi della DT vengano tolte e conservate meglio e più
sicuro nei magazzini militari.
Il nuovo attacco contro il generale Hocevar è arrivato ieri dalle file
del PRTITO Socialista della Slovenia. In esso si contesta a questo
ufficiale”perché non ha ordinato che le armi dal magazzino vengono usate
per le manovre della DT” . Gli viene contestato perché non hs consentito
che ha proibito all’uso delle manovre che in questo contesto sono
pianificate dalla RS della Slovenia, cioè da i suoi dirigenti.
Nella pubblica dichiarazione ufficiale, il Partito socialista tra
l’altro dichiara che ; le manovre della DT in Slovenia saranno
effettuate esclusivamente in base agli ordini dei dirigenti di questa
repubblica, cioè dagli organi competenti. Ciò comporta alla necessità di
nominare un nuovo comandante della DT della Slovenia da parte dei suoi
dirigenti, cioè che questa funzione venga tolta dalla competenza del
Segretariato federale per la difesa jugoslava.
Questo, come anche la chiara politica riguardo le reclute, espressa da
questa repubblica, dimostra che la Slovenia conforme ai suoi piani
confederali, vuole quanto prima l’intera problematica della difesa
nazionale prendere nelle proprie mani, con il che gli organi competenti
della difesa federale come pure la dirigenza della Jugoslavia erano
precedentemente informati.
Perciò, secondo il parere del Partito socialista di questa repubblica,
che in totale esprime le posizioni della dirigenza della Slovenia “il
comportamento del generale Hocevar, ulteriromente aggrava la relazione
della Slovenia con l’EPJ, e con che viene negata la sovranità della
Slovenia, la sua Assemblea e Presidenza”. Tutto ciò, si dice
ulteriormente nella dichiarazione, si crea l’impressione che in Slovenia
c’è una situazione esplosiva (d’incidente).
(S. Petrovic)
Pucnikovo pismo Kucanu
Predsednik vladajuce koalicije u Sloveniji Demos, Joze Pucnik, uputio
je otvoreno pismo Milanu Kucanu u kojem ga optuzuje za neodlucnost u
slucaju oduzimanja i vracanja oruzja teritorijalne odbrane Slovenije.
Lettera aperta di Joze Pucnik, al presidente sloveno Milan Kucan
Ljubljana, 21 settembre
Il presidente della coalizione governativa slovena Demos, Joze Pucnik,
ha inviato una lettera aperta di protesta al presidente della Repubblica
Milan Kucan, nella quale lo accusa per la sua indecisione nel caso della
sottrazione e la restituzione delle armi alla DT della Slovenia.
Sednica Ustavne komisije Vojvodine
PRIHVACEN PREDLOG USTAVA SRBIJE
Novi Ustav omogucit ce svestrani dmokratski razvoj Republike.
Novi Sad, 21 settembre (Tanjug)
La commissione per le questioni costituzionali del Parlamento
SAP(Regione autonoma socialista) della Vojvodina, nella seduta odierna
presieduta dalla presidentessa del Parlamento Verona Adam-Bokros, ha
esaminato e, dopo un dibattito di più ore, ha appoggiato il Decreto
della Costituzione della Repubblica di Serbia.
Alla seduta di questa commissione hanno partecipato alla discussione e
hanno risposto alle molteplici domande i membri della Presidenza della
RS di Serbia e al contempo i membri della Commissione costituzionale
della RS di Serbia Slobodan Vucetic e il dr. Jurij Bajec.
Con il varo della nuova Costituzione, ha dichiarato Verona Adam-Bokros,
si creano le basi per il funzionamento della Repubblica di Serbia come
stato sovrano e moderno. Le risoluzioni proposte esprimono completamente
l’impegno perché la nuova Costituzione renda possibile uno sviluppo
democratico generale della Repubblica di Serbia come una comunità
moderna e democratica inserita nella RSF di Jugoslavia, e anche la
possibilità per uno sviluppo indipendente della Repubblica di Serbia nel
caso in cui non si raggiunga un accordo tra i popoli jugoslavi in una
vita comune nella Jugoslavia federativa.
S Vucetic ha dato ampie motivazioni di alcune decisioni e ha risposto
insieme a Jurij Bajec a molte domande ed anche alle osservazioni
critiche dei membri della Commissione costituzionale della Vojvodina.
Egli ha particolarmente posto attenzione al fatto che anche di fronte ad
una richiesta massiccia di cambiare il termine “nazionalità” nella
Costituzione inserendo il termine “minoranza”, si sia rimasti all’idea
di “nazionalità”, che ha già acquistato il suo pieno significato
soprattutto nella multietnica Vojvodina, il che è anche in conformità
con la Costituzione della RSFJ.
Egli ha smentito le speculazioni e le affermazioni infondate sul
concedere troppo potere al Presidente della Repubblica di Serbia,
sottolineando che l’Assemblea della Repubblica di Serbia ha, come
maggiore organo di governo, un’autorità sia costituzionale che
legislativa, cosicché non si prenda in considerazione nemmeno
l’introduzione di un sistema presidenziale nella repubblica.
JEDNA ULICA U DUBROVNIKU DOBIJA IME ALOJZIJA STEPINCA
Dubrovnik 21 settembre 1990
UNA STRADA A DUBROVNIK PRENDE IL NOME DI ALOJZIJE STEPINAC...
Da "Politika" 4 settembre l990
Pristina ; "Strajk nije uspeo"
Osujecena namera separatista da paralisu zivot na Kosmetu. Republicki
organi Srbije obezbedili normalno funkcioniosanje svih vitalnih funkcija
i snabdevanje gradjana prehrambenim proizvodima.
Danas od separatistickog vrha naredjen i zapocet t.zv. 24. Casovni
generalni strajk Albanaca na Kosovu pretvorio se u poraz sovinista i
separatista......Dok su sve prodavaonice "Mehanizacije" radile, najdalje
u strajku otisli su radnici i rukovodioci, Albanci trgovinskog preduzeca
"Vocar", jer najveci broj prodavaonica nije ni otvoren.
Prvih dana nastava u skolama se odvijala na srpskom, turskom i romskom
jeziku , jer ucenici Albanci nisu ni dosli u skole .
Pristina, 4 settembre : "Lo sciopero non riuscito"
Sventato il tentativo dei separatisti di paralizzare la vita nel Kosovo
e Metohija. Gli organi repubblicani della Serbia hanno assicurato il
funzionamento normale delle funzioni vitali e il rifornimento dei
prodotti alimentari .
Oggi e stato ordinato dai lider separatisti ed è iniziato il cosiddetto
sciopero di 24 ore. Lo sciopero generale degli albanesi nel Kosmet si è
concluso con una sconfitta dei sciovinisti e separatisti... Mentre tutti
i negozi della società "Mehanizacija" sono rimasti aperti, i negozi
della catena alimentare "Vocar", la maggior parte , non hanno aperto.
Postoji li skrivena bolnica ? Veci broj Albanaca nije dosao na
posao. Zene tek sto su se porodile ostavljaju bolnicu. Nestale velike
kolicine lekova.
n Turska salje trupe u Zaljev.
n Gorbacov i Bush pred Branembourskom kapijom. Nemci bi zeleli da
trenutke velike nacionalne radosti podele sa svetom.
n Povlacenje vojske SSSR. Sovjetska armija ima 380.000 vojnika, 160
velikih kasarni, 50.000 oficirskih stanova, 30 aerodroma i 40 poligona.
Protest sovjetskih oficira u garnizonu kod
n Magdenbourga zbog naredbe o skorom povlacenju.
n Ispraviti nepravde nanete Srbiji i srpskom narodu. Novobeogradjani
upoznati sa programom SPS-a.
n Pitanje : Dali ce u Ustavu Srbije sluzbeni jezik biti srpskohrvatski
kao do sada ili srpski, pita Nikola Mrdjan. Srpskohrvatskim jezikom, po
recima Djoke Stojicica, govore 4 naroda - Srbi, Hrvati, Crnogorci i
Muslimani... U sustini to je jedan jezik. Akcije za podelu jezika
ustvari su podle namere da se narodi podele. To je jos krajem sezdesetih
godina u Hrvatskoj sproveo V. Bakaric. On je ustvari odobrio da u
Hrvatskoj u zvanicnoj upotrebi bude hrvatski knjizevni jezik. Sada je
nazalost u Ustavu Hrvatske izbrisan srpski jezik.
......Igra sa terminima, po recima Djoke Stojicica, nimalo nije
naivna. Recimo Siptari na Kosovu su se svojim imenom "sinovi orlova"
ponosili do l968, a onda im je nametnut naziv Albanci. Nazalost oni se
ne upisuju kao jugoslavenski Albanci, vec samo kao Albanci. To znaci
pripadanje Albaniji a en Jugoslaviji. Po onom sto se u svetu priznaje,
oni mogu da budu samo nacionalna manjina. Slicnu igru sada igra SDA u
Sandzaku. Fundamentalisti hoce da su Turci, a zna se da su Muslimani
slovenskog porekla i da govore srpskim jezikom.
U Priboju posle skupstine SDA. Pucalo se na srpsku decu. Zitelji
grada Lima odrzali zbor trazeci ostavke opstinskog rukovodstva koje je
dozvolilo da se osnivacka skupstina SDA obavi u centru grada.
Mr Borisav Radjenovic : "Veliki si posao ucinio za Tudjmana".
Otvoreno pismo Simi Rajicu, potpresedniku Sabora Hrvatske.
Knin : Osnovci nisu posli u skolu. Zbog neizvesne i napete
politicke situacije u Kninskoj krajini danas nije pocela najavljena
nastava u osnovnim skolama. Sindikat prosvetnih radnika, roditelji i
aktivisti Srpske demokratske stranke poslednjih meseci u nekoliko
navrata najavljivali bojkot nastave zbog kroatocentricnih udzbenika i
nastavnih programa. Zbgo bojazni roditelja, naocito onih cija deca
putuju do skole, opstinske prosvetne vlasti odlozili su pocetak nove
skolske godine. Pretprosle noci svi prilazi Kninu blokirani.
Najavljen protestni miting Srba u Sibeniku.
Srbi u Hrvatskoj bili bi srecni da imaju prava Albanaca na Kosmetu,
rekao je Mihajlo Markovic na predstavljanju SPS u Nisu.
Nije rec o niokakvoj zloupotrebi ljudskih prava Albanaca na Kosovu,
vec o stogodisnjoj zelji da se stvori Velika Albanija.... Radovali
bi se i Baski u Spaniji, i Madjari u Rumuniji.....Na Kosmetu se pokusava
da se na jugoslavenskoj, srpskoj teritoriji stvori jos jedna drzava
Albanija. Na zalost ovakve teznje podrzavaju se od Vatikana,
Habzburgovaca, muslimanskih organizacija, a u poslednje vreme i od SAD-a
Iz Amerike se preti kako ce Kongres biti jos restriktivniji u odnosu na
Srbiju i Jugoslaviju i kako nas nece vise pomagati. Time nas ne mogu
uplasiti. Zahvaljujemo im na pomoci koju su nam pruzili pedesetih
godina, ali ono sto su ucinili sedamdesetih, kada smo dobili 20
milijardi dolara, da bi samo kroz kamate do sada morali da platimo 40
milijardi i da nam pri tom ostane dug od 16 milijardi, pre bi se moglo
nazvati pljackom nego pomoci.
U velikoj dvorani Studentskog centra u Zagrebu, "Orlovi" i
"Jastrebovi" u istom jatu. Dajuci podrsku strajku separatista na Kosovu,
hrvatski nacionalisti su se juce obracali okupljernim Albancima pozivom
: "Ustanite braco !"
Doktor Slobodan Lang posti na Trgu Marsala Tita u Zagrebu. Skup
otvorio Ivan Zvonimir Cicak na "zdencu zivota"
Cudna promocija na Sirokom Brijegu. Novi "crnokosuljasi" u stroju.
Makedonija : Dramaticno saopstenje sa preksinocne sednice
Izvrsnog veca sobranja SR Makedonije. Ozbiljno naruseni politicki zivot
i bezbedno stanje u Makedoniji. Jednonacionalna siptarska organizacija,
Partija za demokratski prosperitet, poznata po separatistickim
ciljevima, namece se kao pandan i paralelna vlast legalnim drzavnim
organima. U svom delovanju VMRO -DRMNJ upotrebljava teroristicke metode
linca.
Makedonija - poligon siptarskog separatistickog delovanja kosovske
alternative.
Sejanje straha medju Makedoncima i cestitim Siptarima.
Su Ante Markovic
Krajnje je kontroverzna pojava stranke Ante Mrkovica na
politickoj sceni. Premijer se navodno zalaze za depolitizaciju uprave, a
osniva stranku vlade. Nada se kako rece Mileta Gajic, da ce privuci
siroke mase, a u stvari sprovodi takvu politiku da radnici ne mogu da
poele zaradjeno, a poljoprivrednici da naplateproizvedeno i to po
realnoj sceni.
Sa autorom neobicne knjige o Sumaricama : "Zapisi sa stratista".
Petar Lubarda : Ima li stravicnijeg prizora za ljudske oci od
dece na koju pucaju...". Jean Paul Sartre : "Najbolji utisak koji
stranac moze da ponese iz jedne zemlje, to je bo l koju oseti u toj
zemlji".
"Politika", 22. Septembar 1990.
Na zahtev Okruznog javnog tuzilastva Pristine.
OPTUZENA GRUPA BIVSIH FUNKCIONERA KOSOVA
Zbog osnovane sumnje da su izvrsili krivicno delo udruzivanja radi
neprijateljske delatnosti i ugrozavanja teritorijalne celine SR Srbije
pokrenuta je istraga protiv Juzufa Zejnulahua,Seljadina Skeje, Muhameta
Bicaja, Jusufa Karakusija, Leka Vuksanija, Ise Mustafe i Agima Malje.
Pristina, 21.9.l990.
Okruzni sud u Pristini saopstio je danas da je na zahtev Okruznog javnog
tuzilastva doneo resenje o sprovodjenju istrage protiv sestorice bivsih
clanova Izvrsnog veca Kosova i direktora Radio Televizije Pristina
kojima stavlja na teret da su obrazovali grupu sa ciljem da se
protivustavnim putem izmene granice SR Srbije i Kosovo proglasi
republikom.
U saopstenju se navodi da je istraga pokrenuta protiv Jusufa Zejnulahua,
bivseg predsednika Izvrsnog veca Skupstine SAP Kosovo, Seljadina Skeje,
bivseg sekretara za saobracaj i veze, Muhameta Bicaja, bivseg sekretara
za obrazovanje, nauku i kulturu, Jusufa Karakusija, bivseg pokrajinskog
sekretara za unutrasnje poslove, Leka Vuksanija, bivseg pokrajinskog
sekretara za rad, zdravstvo i socijalnu politiku, Ise Mustafe, bivseg
clana Izvrsnog veca Kosova, kao i Agima Mlaje, bivseg direktora
Radio-televizije Pristina.
Pec, 21.9.90.
Zahtev za smenjivanje predsednika Skupstine opstine, Muhameda
Corkadiju, i Izvrsnog veca SO Pec, Aleksandra Grujica.
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I gruppi di discussione + interessanti e divertenti!
Le liste + calde!!
Il meglio di eCircle!!!
http://www.ecircle.it/ad789403/www.listparade.it
-------- Original Message --------
Oggetto: Report from Sofia, Bulgaria
Data: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:51:52 -0500
Da: iacenter@...
Rispondi-a: "International" <iacenter@...>
A: "International" <iacenter@...>
Report from Sofia
BULGARIAN ANTI-FASCISTS HOST TRIBUNAL ON NATO WAR CRIMES
Sofia, Bulgaria, Oct. 2 and 3
Two delegations from Yugoslavia traveled to this ancient Balkan capital
in late September. Neither got much international media coverage, but
for different reasons.
On Sept. 27 leaders of the US-backed "Democratic Opposition of
Serbia" met here quietly with representatives of the World Bank, the
International Monetary Fund and NATO officials. They signed a "letter
of intent" pledging that when they came to power they would raise
prices, privatize state industry and dismantle Yugoslavia's free health
care system. That was the price the US and other NATO powers
demanded for the hundreds of millions of dollars they pumped into the
campaign to overturn Yugoslavia's Socialist Party government and for
the promised lifting of Western economic sanctions.
Members of the other group had experienced a different form of
Washington's largesse. They had lost children, parents, spouses and
friends to the hail of NATO bombs and missiles that descended on
Yugoslavia in the spring of 1999. They came to tell an international
tribunal of the price the US and NATO imposed on Yugoslavs for not
accepting the IMF's "economic restructuring" plan.
Yugoslavia and Bulgaria have a lot in common. They are neighbors
closely related by language, culture, history and topography. They both
had socialist revolutions at the end of World War II. And over the past
decade they have both been targets of US-directed wars of
destruction. Against Yugoslavia that war was waged with bombs,
missiles, CIA-backed terrorism and economic sanctions. In Bulgaria it
took the form of IMF dictated "shock therapy" imposed by the same
type of "democrats" the US now backs in Yugoslavia. In 1990 a similar
US-funded movement grabbed power in Bulgaria after a campaign of
"destabilization." Today the average Bulgarian lives on 58 cents a day.
"For the past 10 years, life here has been a catastrophe," says Dr.
Mimi Vitkova, who was Bulgaria's health minister from 1995 to 1997.
"We were never a rich country, but when we had socialism our children
were healthy and well-fed. They all got immunized. Retired people and
the disabled were provided for and got free medicine. Our hospitals
were free.
"Today," she continues, "if a person has no money, they have no right
to be cured. And most people have no money. Our economy was
ruined. We had a lot of industry, but after privatization many plants
shut down. We lost our trade with the Soviet Union, with Africa, Latin
America and, of course, Yugoslavia. Officially unemployment here is 17
percent, but in many parts of the country it is 35 percent or more. At
least 1 million of our most educated people have emigrated abroad.
We were promised if we 'privatized' we would get access to West
European markets, but it never happened. Instead we get are tiny
loans from the International Monetary Fund."
Dr. Vitkova is a member of the Bulgarian Antifascist Union, originally
formed by partisans who fought the Nazis and their collaborators
during World War II. While Bulgaria's monarchy sent troops to aid the
Axis in Yugoslavia and Greece, Bulgarian revolutionaries fought
alongside Yugoslav partisans against Hitler's troops.
"Our organization is made up of people who swore to never allow
fascism to return," Vitkova said of the union. "Bulgaria was one of the
the few countries where all Nazi collaborators were punished. But
today the pro-NATO regime is trying to clean up history, saying that
Bulgaria never had fascism. Our main activities are educational, but
they are not only excursions into the past. We may face the same
forces in the future. Our people will not submit to the economic
dictatorship that now rules our country."
On Sept. 30 and Oct. 1, the Antifascist Union hosted the fifth hearing
of
the East Europe?based International People's Tribunal on NATO War
Crimes in Yugoslavia. Previous hearings had been held in Russia,
Ukraine, Germany and Yugoslavia itself. The tribunal cooperates with
the Commission of inquiry on NATO War Crimes headed by former US
attorney general Ramsey Clark. Judges from Bulgaria, Russia, Ukraine,
Georgia, Poland, Burkina Faso, Germany and the United States heard
wrenching testimony from Yugoslav victims of NATO's bombing
campaign. The hearing was opened by Antifascist Union president
Vladimir Velkanov and tribunal president Mikhail Kuznetzov of Russia.
The US antiwar movement was represented by Bill Doares and Lara
Kretskaya of the International Action Center and the US Commision of
Inquiry.
"NATO took everything from me," Olivera Simic of Novi Pazar told the
judges. She described how her husband had gone with their 2-year-old
son to buy parts for their car on May 31, 1999. That was the day
generals at the Pentagon decided to destroy the center of Novi Pazar.
Simic, pregnant, stayed home. She only heard the explosion that
demolished the city's central department store, killing her husband, son
and nine other people.
Elitza Yovanovic was at home on April 5, 1999, the day the US Air
Force bombed the town of Aleksinac. "Aleksinac was my Hiroshima,"
she says. She was not in the house when the missiles hit, but her aunt
and uncle, her husband's parents and most of her friends died that day.
She tried to dig her aunt out of the rubble but it was too late. Her
mother, a doctor, was wounded and died a few months later.
Yovanovic's 6-year-old daughter survived the bombing but still asks
when her left leg will grow back.
Branko Brudaro recalled how he and his wife had decided to send their
9-year-old daughter to stay with his in-laws in rural Montenegro, far
from any roads or military or industrial targets. They could not escape
the Pentagon reach. On April 13, Brudaro's daughter, his wife's sister
and her daughter were killed by NATO bombs.
Milos Markovic is a journalist in the cultural section of Serbian
television. He was working late the night of April 23 when US missiles
destroyed the TV station. "We stumbled outside through smoke and fire
only to see our colleagues' heads and arms lying on top of cars and in
the streets." Markovic noted that Western correspondents often worked
overnight at Serbian TV facilities but none were there the night the
missile hit.
Stoyanc Petrovic's grandson was killed in the bombing. He himself was
hospitalized with a fractured leg when NATO missiles hit the hospital.
20 patients and medical workers died.
A representative of Iraq told of the 9 years of destruction inflicted on
his country by US-directed war and sanctions, which have taken the
lives of hundreds of thousands of children.
The tribunal also heard testimony about the murder and persecution of
Serbs, Romas, Gorans, Turks and other minorities in Kosovo inthe 13
months of NATO-KFOR occupation. The judges unanimously found the
leaders and military commanders of NATO guilty of war crimes against
the people of Yugoslavia. The final verdict called for the abolition of
NATO as a "criminal organization," an end to the occupation of Kosovo
and for reparations to the Yugoslav people from the NATO powers.
IAC representative Doares closed the tribunal with a denunciation of US-
NATO interference in the Yugoslav elections, which he called a
"continuation of the war." He compared the IMF's destruction of the
Bulgarian economy to the devastation of Yugoslavia by NATO bombs
and missiles and drew applause when he called NATO and the IMF
"two arms of the same monster."
Judges from other East European and former Soviet republics were
familiar with the role of NATO and the IMF. One of them was
Pantaleymun Georgadze, general secretary of the Communist party of
the former Soviet republic of Georgia. He told IAC representatives that
while most Georgians now live on the edge of starvation, the US-
backed Shevardnadze wants turn Georgia into a NATO base. "They
want to make the Caucasus a zone of war like the Balkans," he said.
Georgadze's son, once the republic's minister of security, has been
froced into hiding for opposing the Shevardnadze regime.
Representatives from Ukraine told how the NATO-backed "democratic"
regime in their country has also destroyed their country's industry
while
dragging Ukraine into NATO's "Partnership for Peace." NATO held
maneuvers in Ukraine last summer.
Among the Bulgarians attending the hearing was Blagovesta Doncheva, a
former
schoolteacher who was once an anticommunist "dissident. Now an anti-NATO
activist, she was arrested for protesting Clinton's visit to Bulgaria in
1999.
She was deeply concerned about Western intervention in the Yugoslav
elections. "They did exactly the same thing in 10 years ago in
Bulgaria," Doncheva says. "The Bulgarian 'Union of Democratic Forces'
was flooded with money, cars, trucks, computers from the CIA and the
Soros Foundation. They made big promises, and we believed them.
Then the IMF and World Bank destroyed the very fabric of our society.
Our industry was shut down, our pensions were taken away. Earlier
women could retire at 55 and men at 60; now no one can retire. Our
seniors are eating out of garbage bins, children are dying in the
streets
from drugs and malnutrition. The last 10 years have been the most
awful of my life. For us, stopping NATO and the IMF is a matter of
survival."
International Action Center
39 West 14th Street, Room 206
New York, NY 10011
email: iacenter@...
web: http://www.iacenter.org
CHECK OUT SITE http://www.mumia2000.org
phone: 212 633-6646
fax: 212 633-2889
*To make a tax-deductible donation,
go to http://www.peoplesrightsfund.org
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Una newsletter personale,
un forum web personale,
una mailing list personale, ...?
Gratis sotto
http://www.ecircle.it/ad889131/www.ecircle.it
Oggetto: Report from Sofia, Bulgaria
Data: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:51:52 -0500
Da: iacenter@...
Rispondi-a: "International" <iacenter@...>
A: "International" <iacenter@...>
Report from Sofia
BULGARIAN ANTI-FASCISTS HOST TRIBUNAL ON NATO WAR CRIMES
Sofia, Bulgaria, Oct. 2 and 3
Two delegations from Yugoslavia traveled to this ancient Balkan capital
in late September. Neither got much international media coverage, but
for different reasons.
On Sept. 27 leaders of the US-backed "Democratic Opposition of
Serbia" met here quietly with representatives of the World Bank, the
International Monetary Fund and NATO officials. They signed a "letter
of intent" pledging that when they came to power they would raise
prices, privatize state industry and dismantle Yugoslavia's free health
care system. That was the price the US and other NATO powers
demanded for the hundreds of millions of dollars they pumped into the
campaign to overturn Yugoslavia's Socialist Party government and for
the promised lifting of Western economic sanctions.
Members of the other group had experienced a different form of
Washington's largesse. They had lost children, parents, spouses and
friends to the hail of NATO bombs and missiles that descended on
Yugoslavia in the spring of 1999. They came to tell an international
tribunal of the price the US and NATO imposed on Yugoslavs for not
accepting the IMF's "economic restructuring" plan.
Yugoslavia and Bulgaria have a lot in common. They are neighbors
closely related by language, culture, history and topography. They both
had socialist revolutions at the end of World War II. And over the past
decade they have both been targets of US-directed wars of
destruction. Against Yugoslavia that war was waged with bombs,
missiles, CIA-backed terrorism and economic sanctions. In Bulgaria it
took the form of IMF dictated "shock therapy" imposed by the same
type of "democrats" the US now backs in Yugoslavia. In 1990 a similar
US-funded movement grabbed power in Bulgaria after a campaign of
"destabilization." Today the average Bulgarian lives on 58 cents a day.
"For the past 10 years, life here has been a catastrophe," says Dr.
Mimi Vitkova, who was Bulgaria's health minister from 1995 to 1997.
"We were never a rich country, but when we had socialism our children
were healthy and well-fed. They all got immunized. Retired people and
the disabled were provided for and got free medicine. Our hospitals
were free.
"Today," she continues, "if a person has no money, they have no right
to be cured. And most people have no money. Our economy was
ruined. We had a lot of industry, but after privatization many plants
shut down. We lost our trade with the Soviet Union, with Africa, Latin
America and, of course, Yugoslavia. Officially unemployment here is 17
percent, but in many parts of the country it is 35 percent or more. At
least 1 million of our most educated people have emigrated abroad.
We were promised if we 'privatized' we would get access to West
European markets, but it never happened. Instead we get are tiny
loans from the International Monetary Fund."
Dr. Vitkova is a member of the Bulgarian Antifascist Union, originally
formed by partisans who fought the Nazis and their collaborators
during World War II. While Bulgaria's monarchy sent troops to aid the
Axis in Yugoslavia and Greece, Bulgarian revolutionaries fought
alongside Yugoslav partisans against Hitler's troops.
"Our organization is made up of people who swore to never allow
fascism to return," Vitkova said of the union. "Bulgaria was one of the
the few countries where all Nazi collaborators were punished. But
today the pro-NATO regime is trying to clean up history, saying that
Bulgaria never had fascism. Our main activities are educational, but
they are not only excursions into the past. We may face the same
forces in the future. Our people will not submit to the economic
dictatorship that now rules our country."
On Sept. 30 and Oct. 1, the Antifascist Union hosted the fifth hearing
of
the East Europe?based International People's Tribunal on NATO War
Crimes in Yugoslavia. Previous hearings had been held in Russia,
Ukraine, Germany and Yugoslavia itself. The tribunal cooperates with
the Commission of inquiry on NATO War Crimes headed by former US
attorney general Ramsey Clark. Judges from Bulgaria, Russia, Ukraine,
Georgia, Poland, Burkina Faso, Germany and the United States heard
wrenching testimony from Yugoslav victims of NATO's bombing
campaign. The hearing was opened by Antifascist Union president
Vladimir Velkanov and tribunal president Mikhail Kuznetzov of Russia.
The US antiwar movement was represented by Bill Doares and Lara
Kretskaya of the International Action Center and the US Commision of
Inquiry.
"NATO took everything from me," Olivera Simic of Novi Pazar told the
judges. She described how her husband had gone with their 2-year-old
son to buy parts for their car on May 31, 1999. That was the day
generals at the Pentagon decided to destroy the center of Novi Pazar.
Simic, pregnant, stayed home. She only heard the explosion that
demolished the city's central department store, killing her husband, son
and nine other people.
Elitza Yovanovic was at home on April 5, 1999, the day the US Air
Force bombed the town of Aleksinac. "Aleksinac was my Hiroshima,"
she says. She was not in the house when the missiles hit, but her aunt
and uncle, her husband's parents and most of her friends died that day.
She tried to dig her aunt out of the rubble but it was too late. Her
mother, a doctor, was wounded and died a few months later.
Yovanovic's 6-year-old daughter survived the bombing but still asks
when her left leg will grow back.
Branko Brudaro recalled how he and his wife had decided to send their
9-year-old daughter to stay with his in-laws in rural Montenegro, far
from any roads or military or industrial targets. They could not escape
the Pentagon reach. On April 13, Brudaro's daughter, his wife's sister
and her daughter were killed by NATO bombs.
Milos Markovic is a journalist in the cultural section of Serbian
television. He was working late the night of April 23 when US missiles
destroyed the TV station. "We stumbled outside through smoke and fire
only to see our colleagues' heads and arms lying on top of cars and in
the streets." Markovic noted that Western correspondents often worked
overnight at Serbian TV facilities but none were there the night the
missile hit.
Stoyanc Petrovic's grandson was killed in the bombing. He himself was
hospitalized with a fractured leg when NATO missiles hit the hospital.
20 patients and medical workers died.
A representative of Iraq told of the 9 years of destruction inflicted on
his country by US-directed war and sanctions, which have taken the
lives of hundreds of thousands of children.
The tribunal also heard testimony about the murder and persecution of
Serbs, Romas, Gorans, Turks and other minorities in Kosovo inthe 13
months of NATO-KFOR occupation. The judges unanimously found the
leaders and military commanders of NATO guilty of war crimes against
the people of Yugoslavia. The final verdict called for the abolition of
NATO as a "criminal organization," an end to the occupation of Kosovo
and for reparations to the Yugoslav people from the NATO powers.
IAC representative Doares closed the tribunal with a denunciation of US-
NATO interference in the Yugoslav elections, which he called a
"continuation of the war." He compared the IMF's destruction of the
Bulgarian economy to the devastation of Yugoslavia by NATO bombs
and missiles and drew applause when he called NATO and the IMF
"two arms of the same monster."
Judges from other East European and former Soviet republics were
familiar with the role of NATO and the IMF. One of them was
Pantaleymun Georgadze, general secretary of the Communist party of
the former Soviet republic of Georgia. He told IAC representatives that
while most Georgians now live on the edge of starvation, the US-
backed Shevardnadze wants turn Georgia into a NATO base. "They
want to make the Caucasus a zone of war like the Balkans," he said.
Georgadze's son, once the republic's minister of security, has been
froced into hiding for opposing the Shevardnadze regime.
Representatives from Ukraine told how the NATO-backed "democratic"
regime in their country has also destroyed their country's industry
while
dragging Ukraine into NATO's "Partnership for Peace." NATO held
maneuvers in Ukraine last summer.
Among the Bulgarians attending the hearing was Blagovesta Doncheva, a
former
schoolteacher who was once an anticommunist "dissident. Now an anti-NATO
activist, she was arrested for protesting Clinton's visit to Bulgaria in
1999.
She was deeply concerned about Western intervention in the Yugoslav
elections. "They did exactly the same thing in 10 years ago in
Bulgaria," Doncheva says. "The Bulgarian 'Union of Democratic Forces'
was flooded with money, cars, trucks, computers from the CIA and the
Soros Foundation. They made big promises, and we believed them.
Then the IMF and World Bank destroyed the very fabric of our society.
Our industry was shut down, our pensions were taken away. Earlier
women could retire at 55 and men at 60; now no one can retire. Our
seniors are eating out of garbage bins, children are dying in the
streets
from drugs and malnutrition. The last 10 years have been the most
awful of my life. For us, stopping NATO and the IMF is a matter of
survival."
International Action Center
39 West 14th Street, Room 206
New York, NY 10011
email: iacenter@...
web: http://www.iacenter.org
CHECK OUT SITE http://www.mumia2000.org
phone: 212 633-6646
fax: 212 633-2889
*To make a tax-deductible donation,
go to http://www.peoplesrightsfund.org
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Una newsletter personale,
un forum web personale,
una mailing list personale, ...?
Gratis sotto
http://www.ecircle.it/ad889131/www.ecircle.it
DAL SITO "EMPEROR'S NEW CLOTHES":
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/spring/honor2.htm
Don't Let The War Crimes Tribunal Move Into Belgrade!
by William Spring (11-9-2000)
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/malic/wheels.htm
WHEELS OF INJUSTICE: On the War Crimes Tribunal's Invitation to Belgrade
Nebojsa Malic, 12 November 2000
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/tolls.htm
plus an errata at
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/tolls-r.htm
For Whom the Bell Tolls
by Jared Israel (11-21-2000)
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/cavoski/c-1.htm
UNJUST FROM THE START: THE WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL VS. GENERAL DJORDJE
DJUKIC
By Dr. Kosta Cavoski (posted 11-8-2000)
[Note: Prof. Kosta Cavoski is a distinguished Yugoslav law scholar who
has taught theory of law at the University of Belgrade. This is the
first of a 4 part series by Dr. Cavoski on the International Criminal
Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, the ICTY or War Crimes Tribunal. It
is urgent that we understand the day to day work of the Tribunal because
the governing forces in Belgrade have invited it to set up an offices in
Belgrade, and have promised to aid in hunting down supposed war
criminals, many of whom are supposedly on a secret list. Here Prof.
Cavoski describes the capture and destruction of one such 'war criminal'
during the early days of the Tribunal. - Jared Israel]
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/cavoski/c-2.htm
Unjust, Part II: The Mistreatment of Col. Aleksa Krsmanovic
By Dr. Kosta Cavoski (posted 11-13-2000)
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/cavoski/c-3.htm
Unjust, Part III: The Illegal Basis of the War Crimes Tribunal
By Dr. Kosta Cavoski (posted 11-13-2000)
Professor Cavoski brilliantly analyzes the legal rationale behind the
War Crimes Tribunal.
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/cavoski/c-4.htm
Unjust from the Start, Part IV: Learning from the Inquisition
By Dr. Kosta Cavoski (posted 11-13-2000)
Secret witnesses and some defendants who are more equal than
others. Conclusion of Dr. Cavoski's 4 part series.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Pour la suppression du Tribunal Pénal International de La Haye
Comme les lecteurs de "Balkans-Infos" ont pu le voir dans le dernier
numéro 46, la mise en accusation des leaders de l'OTAN
s'organise à l'échelle internationale.
Parallèlement aux réquisitoires dressés contre eux par d'éminents
juristes, il y a toute une action qui se met sur pied pour
dénoncer la politisation et la partialité du Tribunal pénal
international de La Haye, et pour réclamer sa disparition.
Pour ceux qui sont intéressés à participer à la discussion en langue
anglaise à propos de cette action, voici les adresses
d'e-mail des correspondants de différents pays (Canada, USA, France,
Italie, Indes, etc.) qui envisagent la meilleure façon de
procéder, et qui accueillent toutes les suggestions intéressantes.
"Balkans-Infos" en fait bien sûr partie, mais nous souhaiterions
que la France soit plus présente qu'elle ne l'a été jusqu'à présent dans
ce combat contre l'injustice.
Ceux qui ne parlent que français, peuvent communiquer leurs idées à
Diana Johnstone (qui habite Paris) ou à Louis Dalmas :
Ova adresa el. pošte je zaštićena od spambotova. Omogućite JavaScript da biste je videli.
Chris Black : bar@...
Diana Johnstone : 107764.116@...
Michael Mandel : mmandel@...
Ed Herman : hermane@..., emperors1000@...
David Jacobs : david@...
John Laughland JLAUGHLAND@...
John Philpot : jphilpot@...
Tiphaine Dickson : dragonlady25@...
Michel Chossudovsky : chossudovsky@...
Peter Erlinder : perlinder@...
S. Eggerdinger : s.eggerdinger@...
Daniel Dostanic : dostanic@..., stlouis@...
Siddharth Varadarajan :svaradarajan@...
George C. Thomas :gcthomas@...
Tiziano Raffaelli : raffaelli@...
Uwe Ewald :uweewald@...
Louis Dalmas (8/2000)
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eCircle ti offre una nuova opportunita:
la tua agenda sul web - per te e per i tuoi amici
Organizza on line i tuoi appuntamenti .
E' facile, veloce e gratuito!
Da oggi su
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1067368/www.ecircle.it
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/spring/honor2.htm
Don't Let The War Crimes Tribunal Move Into Belgrade!
by William Spring (11-9-2000)
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/malic/wheels.htm
WHEELS OF INJUSTICE: On the War Crimes Tribunal's Invitation to Belgrade
Nebojsa Malic, 12 November 2000
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/tolls.htm
plus an errata at
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/tolls-r.htm
For Whom the Bell Tolls
by Jared Israel (11-21-2000)
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/cavoski/c-1.htm
UNJUST FROM THE START: THE WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL VS. GENERAL DJORDJE
DJUKIC
By Dr. Kosta Cavoski (posted 11-8-2000)
[Note: Prof. Kosta Cavoski is a distinguished Yugoslav law scholar who
has taught theory of law at the University of Belgrade. This is the
first of a 4 part series by Dr. Cavoski on the International Criminal
Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, the ICTY or War Crimes Tribunal. It
is urgent that we understand the day to day work of the Tribunal because
the governing forces in Belgrade have invited it to set up an offices in
Belgrade, and have promised to aid in hunting down supposed war
criminals, many of whom are supposedly on a secret list. Here Prof.
Cavoski describes the capture and destruction of one such 'war criminal'
during the early days of the Tribunal. - Jared Israel]
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/cavoski/c-2.htm
Unjust, Part II: The Mistreatment of Col. Aleksa Krsmanovic
By Dr. Kosta Cavoski (posted 11-13-2000)
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/cavoski/c-3.htm
Unjust, Part III: The Illegal Basis of the War Crimes Tribunal
By Dr. Kosta Cavoski (posted 11-13-2000)
Professor Cavoski brilliantly analyzes the legal rationale behind the
War Crimes Tribunal.
> http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/cavoski/c-4.htm
Unjust from the Start, Part IV: Learning from the Inquisition
By Dr. Kosta Cavoski (posted 11-13-2000)
Secret witnesses and some defendants who are more equal than
others. Conclusion of Dr. Cavoski's 4 part series.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Pour la suppression du Tribunal Pénal International de La Haye
Comme les lecteurs de "Balkans-Infos" ont pu le voir dans le dernier
numéro 46, la mise en accusation des leaders de l'OTAN
s'organise à l'échelle internationale.
Parallèlement aux réquisitoires dressés contre eux par d'éminents
juristes, il y a toute une action qui se met sur pied pour
dénoncer la politisation et la partialité du Tribunal pénal
international de La Haye, et pour réclamer sa disparition.
Pour ceux qui sont intéressés à participer à la discussion en langue
anglaise à propos de cette action, voici les adresses
d'e-mail des correspondants de différents pays (Canada, USA, France,
Italie, Indes, etc.) qui envisagent la meilleure façon de
procéder, et qui accueillent toutes les suggestions intéressantes.
"Balkans-Infos" en fait bien sûr partie, mais nous souhaiterions
que la France soit plus présente qu'elle ne l'a été jusqu'à présent dans
ce combat contre l'injustice.
Ceux qui ne parlent que français, peuvent communiquer leurs idées à
Diana Johnstone (qui habite Paris) ou à Louis Dalmas :
Ova adresa el. pošte je zaštićena od spambotova. Omogućite JavaScript da biste je videli.
Chris Black : bar@...
Diana Johnstone : 107764.116@...
Michael Mandel : mmandel@...
Ed Herman : hermane@..., emperors1000@...
David Jacobs : david@...
John Laughland JLAUGHLAND@...
John Philpot : jphilpot@...
Tiphaine Dickson : dragonlady25@...
Michel Chossudovsky : chossudovsky@...
Peter Erlinder : perlinder@...
S. Eggerdinger : s.eggerdinger@...
Daniel Dostanic : dostanic@..., stlouis@...
Siddharth Varadarajan :svaradarajan@...
George C. Thomas :gcthomas@...
Tiziano Raffaelli : raffaelli@...
Uwe Ewald :uweewald@...
Louis Dalmas (8/2000)
---
A cura del Coordinamento Nazionale "La Jugoslavia Vivra'".
I documenti distribuiti non rispecchiano necessariamente le
opinioni delle realta' che compongono il Coordinamento, ma
vengono fatti circolare per il loro contenuto informativo al
solo scopo di segnalazione e commento ("for fair use only").
Archivio:
> http://www.ecircle.it/an_ecircle/articles?ecircleid%c2%91979
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/crj-mailinglist/messages
Sito WEB:
> http://digilander.iol.it/lajugoslaviavivra
Per iscriversi al bollettino: <jugoinfo-subscribe@...>
Per cancellarsi: <jugoinfo-unsubscribe@...>
Per inviare materiali e commenti: <jugocoord@...>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eCircle ti offre una nuova opportunita:
la tua agenda sul web - per te e per i tuoi amici
Organizza on line i tuoi appuntamenti .
E' facile, veloce e gratuito!
Da oggi su
http://www.ecircle.it/ad1067368/www.ecircle.it
Jugocoord su Telegram
Jugocoord su Facebook