Informazione


See also / isto pogledaj:

Hague tribunal wakes up to Mladic interview (video)
http://rt.com/news/hague-mladic-interview-rt/

I recognize only my own people’s trial: Mladic in long-suppressed interview
http://rt.com/news/mladic-interview-srebrenica-massacre-155/

Interview with Ratko Mladic: full transcript
http://rt.com/news/ratko-mladic-interview-full-185/

VIDEO: Interviju 13.08.1995. (7 delovi)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z6xgV5LsK0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qilwG4fmJgI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtRGIp4_m6Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmBD7A2kmN8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FE-Xt-fJJi0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9XE15YoAkA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwyYYfJA2mk

Ratko Mladić i Si-en-en, 1995. godine
http://www.jadovno.com/intervjui-reportaze-2/articles/ratko-mladic-i-si-en-en-1995-godine-lat.html
http://www.frontal.rs/index.php?option=btg_novosti&catnovosti=6&idnovost=11533

---

source: http://www.en.beoforum.rs/comments-belgrade-forum-for-the-world-of-equals/206-what-really-happened-in-bosnia.html

The untold truth about Ratko Mladic 

By Richard Palmer
June 1, 2011 | From theTrumpet.com

It was genocide. Charles Krauthammer called it “the largest ethnic cleansing of the entire Balkan wars.” A March 1999 New York Times article agreed with him.
“Investigators with the war-crimes tribunal in the Hague have concluded that this campaign was carried out with brutality, wanton murder and indiscriminate shelling of civilians,” Krauthammer wrote.
Is this the dreaded “Srebrenica” massacre, the “worst atrocity in Europe since the Second World War” perpetrated by the evil Serbs led by Ratko Mladic, who has now been arrested and will be brought to justice?
No.
This genocide was carried out by the Croats—the “good guys”—and so it was encouraged and praised by the West.
The massacre Krauthammer was describing was in the region of Krajina in Croatia. Croatian troops forced an estimated 200,000 Serbs to flee (National Post, March 13, 2004).
“A war that begins with civilian areas being shelled at 5 a.m. when women and children are asleep in their beds and ends with a massive exodus of more than 100,000 people is surely tantamount to ethnic cleansing,” said UN spokesman Chris Gunness.
According to Robert Fisk, writing in the Independent, the European Union’s confidential assessment from Krajina stated the following:
Evidence of atrocities; an average of six corpses p/day, continues to emerge … the corpses; some fresh, some decomposed, are mainly of old men. Many have been shot in the back of the head or had throats slit, others have been mutilated. Isolated pockets of elderly civilians report people recently gone missing or detained …. Endless Croat invitations for Serbs to return, guarantees of citizens’ rights and property rights, etc., have gushed forth from all levels …. However, Serbian homes and lands … continue to be torched and looted.
Contrary to official statements blaming it on fleeing Serbs and uncontrollable elements, the crimes have been perpetrated by the HV Croatian Army, the CR Croatian police and CR civilians. There have been no observed attempts to stop it and the indications point to a scorched-earth policy.
Two senior Canadian military officers present in Croatia at the time testified that the Croatians attacked indiscriminately and targeted civilians.
One of these officers, Maj. Gen. Andrew Leslie, estimated around 500 civilians were murdered.
“In the hospital itself, there were bodies stacked in the corridors,” he said. “There were bodies in almost every hospital bed. And there were bodies lying in the foyer, the reception area and some of the corridors” (National Post, Dec. 9, 2005).
Yugoslav envoy Vladimir Pavicevic claimed that 15,000 Serbs were dead in Krajina, and that this total included slain refugees and soldiers who had already surrendered (Deutsche Presse-Agentur, Aug. 14, 1995). The International Committee of the Red Cross reported that 10,000 to 15,000 refugees were still missing, over three weeks after the initial attack (Sun Herald, Aug. 27, 1995).

Why is Srebrenica everywhere, yet Krajina barely gets a mention? On April 15, Croatian Gen. Ante Gotovina was found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ictyf) for what he did in Krajina. It was hardly mentioned in the press. Ratko Mladic is captured. It’s all over the papers.


Media Deception


Serbia’s earliest defeat came in the PR war. Early on, Serbia’s enemies engaged Ruder Finn, an American public relations firm, to get their message out. James Harff, director of Ruder Finn’s Global Public Affairs section, boasted about his success against Serbia.
“Nobody understood what was going on in (former) Yugoslavia,” he said in an October 1993 interview. “The great majority of Americans were probably asking themselves in which African country Bosnia was situated.”
Ruder Finn took advantage of this ignorance. Its first goal was to persuade the Jews to oppose the Serbs—not an easy task. “The Croatian and Bosnian past was marked by a real and cruel anti-Semitism,” said Harff. “Tens of thousands of Jews perished in Croatian camps. So there was every reason for intellectuals and Jewish organizations to be hostile towards the Croats and Bosnians.”
Harff used a couple reports in the New York Newsday about Serbian concentration camps to persuade Jewish groups to demonstrate against the Serbs. “This was a tremendous coup,” said Harff. “When the Jewish organizations entered the game on the side of the Bosnians, we could promptly equate the Serbs with the Nazis in the public mind.”
He continued: “By a single move, we were able to present a simple story of good guys and bad guys which would hereafter play itself. We won by targeting Jewish audience, the right target. Almost immediately there was a clear change of language in the press, with the use of words with high emotional content, such as ‘ethnic cleansing,’ ‘concentration camps,’ etc., which evoked inmates of Nazi Germany and the gas chambers of Auschwitz. The emotional change was so powerful that nobody could go against it.”
Western reporting of the Balkan wars became spectacularly biased. Consider the following quotes, most of which are from people who were actually in the Balkans during the wars:

  • “Those of us who served as UN commanders in Bosnia realized the majority of the media reports were biased, to say the least. Whenever we tried to set the record straight we were—and continue to be—accused of being ‘Serbian agents.’”—Lewis MacKenzie, former United Nations protection force general in the former Yugoslavia and commander of the Sarajevo sector
  • “[T]he reporting and commenting of some members of the press corp in Sarajevo became close to becoming identified to the propaganda machine of the Bosnia government.”—United Nations Protection Force (unprofor) commander in Bosnia Gen. Sir Michael Rose
  • “The American press has become very partisan and anti-Serbian. They are very selective and manipulative with the information they use.”—anonymous UN official
  • “I’ve worked with the press for a long time, and I have never seen so much lack of professionalism and ethics in the press. Especially by the American press, there is an extremely hostile style of reporting.”—anonymous UN official
  • “I was shocked when a relative read a story to me over the telephone. My byline was on top of the story, but I couldn’t recognize anything else.”—anonymous American correspondent in Belgrade
  • “Despite steady reports of atrocities committed there by Croatian soldiers and paramilitary units against Serbs, which some Belgrade correspondents were later able to confirm, the stories that reached the world talked only of Serb abuses …. In a three-month study of news reports, Howard University Professor of International Relations Nikolaos Stavrou detected ‘a disturbing pattern in news coverage.’ He claimed most of the stories were based on ‘hearsay evidence,’ with few attempts to show the ‘other side’s perspectives.’ Ninety percent of the stories originated in Sarajevo, but only 5 percent in Belgrade. Stavrou’s analysis cited ethnic stereotyping, with Serbs referred to as primitive ‘remnants of the Ottoman Empire’ and Yugoslav army officers described as ‘orthodox communist generals’ … while newspaper photographs neglected to show suffering or dead Serbs or destroyed Serb churches and villages.”—Foreign Policy magazine
  • “There is hypocrisy in the current outrage of Western journalists, politicians and voters. And perhaps even a strain of racism.”—Charles Lane, Newsweek

Foreign Policy magazine pointed out that news outlets published many photos they said showed victims of Serbian persecution. But the captions simply weren’t correct. In many cases, the victims themselves were Serbs.


Srebrenica


It is little wonder, then, that the events that took place in Srebrenica have been horribly twisted by the media. Yes, the Serbs killed Bosnian Muslims whom they had taken prisoner. But the context in which this occurred is vital to understanding this event.
The story portrayed in the media is that Bosnian Serbian forces under Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic invaded the UN “safe haven” of Sarajevo. Here they let the women, children and elderly escape, before massacring all the men.
What is mentioned less often is that the Bosnia Muslims were using the UN “safe haven” as a base for attacks on Serbian civilians.
The UN admitted that Bosnian forces were violating the no-fly zone around Srebrenica and were smuggling weapons into the area (see testimony by David Harland, civil affairs officer and political adviser to the unprofor commander in Bosnia and Herzegovina at the ictyf).
In charge of the Muslim forces in Srebrenica was Naser Oric. Here is how French Gen. Philippe Morillon, commander of the UN troops in Bosnia from 1992 to 1993, described him: “Naser Oric engaged in attacks during Orthodox holidays and destroyed villages, massacring all the inhabitants. This created a degree of hatred that was quite extraordinary in the region ….”
In another part of his testimony, he stated, “There were terrible massacres committed by the forces of Naser Oric in all the surrounding villages.”
He also stated: “I think you will find this in other testimony, not just mine. Naser Oric was a warlord who reigned by terror in his area and over the population itself. I think that he realized that those were the rules of this horrific war, that he could not allow himself to take prisoners. According to my recollection, he didn’t even look for an excuse. It was simply a statement: One can’t be bothered with prisoners.”
This, naturally, infuriated the Serbs. “They were in this hellish circle of revenge,” said Morillon. “It was more than revenge that animated them all. Not only the men. The women, the entire population was imbued with this. It wasn’t the sickness of fear that had infected the entire population of Bosnia-Herzegovina, the fear of being dominated, of being eliminated, it was pure hatred.”
It was this hatred and circle of revenge that led to the Srebrenica massacre.
Continuing with Morillon’s testimony, the general stated that Oric pulled out of Srebrenica a week before it fell. “I said that Mladic had entered an ambush in Srebrenica, a trap, in fact. He expected to find resistance, but there was none. He didn’t expect the massacre to occur but he completely underestimated the amount of hatred that accrued. I don’t believe that he ordered the massacres, but I don’t know. That is my personal opinion.”
The Serbs finally reacted to Oric’s provocations. When they took Srebrenica far more easily than they thought they would they took their revenge on the men they found there. But, unlike Oric, they let the women and children go.
When asked by the judge if what the Serbs did in Srebrenica was a natural reaction to what happened under Oric, Morillon answered: “Yes. Yes, Your Honor. I am convinced of that. This doesn’t mean to pardon or diminish the responsibility of the people who committed that crime, but I am convinced of that, yes.”
The full context presents a very different picture of Srebrenica. It was not a cold-hearted Nazi-style final solution for Bosnian Muslims. Instead it was a crime of passion—still a crime, but one that was provoked by crimes on the other side.
Morillon still held Mladic responsible for what happened in Srebrenica because he didn’t follow through on international agreements two years earlier. But there is a big difference between a military leader who doesn’t trust the other side enough to make peace, and Adolf Eichmann.
“All the horrors of all the ages were brought together, and not only armies but whole populations were thrust into the midst of them,” wrote Winston Churchill after World War i. “The mighty educated states involved conceived—not without reason—that their very existence was at stake. Neither peoples nor rulers drew the line at any deed which they thought could help them to win. Germany, having let hell loose, kept well in the van of terror; but she was followed step by step by the desperate and ultimately avenging nations she had assailed. Every outrage against humanity or international law was repaid by reprisals—often of a greater scale and of longer duration.”
“When all was over, torture and cannibalism were the only two expedients that the civilized, scientific, Christian states had been able to deny themselves: And they were of doubtful utility,” concluded Churchill.
Does his description of World War i sound any different from what happened in Srebrenica? That doesn’t make it right, of course. But the real blame for Srebrenica lies with those who started the war.


Who Started the War?


Western media blame the “evil” Serbs for causing war by trying to grab as much territory as they could while Yugoslavia fell apart. The facts show a different picture.
Former chairman of the peace conference on Yugoslavia, Lord Peter Carrington, stated that the actions of the U.S., Germany and certain other European governments “made it sure there was going to be a conflict” in the region.
The European Community (precursor to the EU) was almost unanimous in agreeing that the best way to avoid a war in Yugoslavia was for it to remain one nation. Member states voted 11 to 1 in 1991 to support a resolution that stated that “the best way of achieving stability in the Balkans was for Yugoslavia to remain united, albeit in a revised, looser federal form.”
The one ended up overruling the 11.
Here’s how T.W. “Bill” Carr, associate publisher of Defense and Foreign Affairs’ Strategic Policy, describes what happened:
Germany, despite its current problems, remains the strongest economy in Europe. During the Maastricht negotiations, a reunited Germany used that power to further what appeared to be its historical strategic objective to control the territories of Croatia, Slovenia and Dalmatia, with their access to the Adriatic and Mediterranean.
During protracted negotiations, Germany wore down the other EC members and eventually, at 04.00 hours on the morning of the debate, the 11:1 vote to hold Yugoslavia united turned into a unanimous vote to recognize Croatia as an independent state on the grounds that the right to self-determination overruled all other criteria.
“In order to maintain its own unity, the EC sacrificed the unity of Yugoslavia, and with it, the stability of the Balkans,” Carr writes.
“Germany had won round one,” he continues. “Shortly after, Germany won round two when Bosnia-Herzegovina was also recognized, despite EC negotiator Lord Carrington’s advice that such a step would result in a civil war.”
America, too, allowed itself to be led by Germany into pushing Yugoslavia into civil war.
But Germany wasn’t alone. Carr writes, “The German/Croatian axis and expansionist Islam are the key players in the region, along with the very real interest and role played by the Vatican and the Croatian Catholic Church.”
These forces conspired to cause a war in Yugoslavia so Germany could regain its influence in the Balkans.
Here’s how Karadzic makes his case in a recent interview for Politics First:
The Germans wanted to take revenge on Yugoslavia for its involvement in World Wars i and ii on the side of the anti-German coalition; to support their allies in Slovenia and Croatia as well as the Bosnian Muslims; and to secure strategic access for themselves through Slovenia and Croatia to the Adriatic Sea, as it had a preference for a group of small countries in the European Union instead of a big one.
The Germans went on to back Serbia’s enemies. The German tv program Monitor unearthed evidence of German intelligence agents smuggling weapons to the Bosnia Muslims. Operating under the guise of neutral European Union monitors, Germany smuggled weapons and ammunition to Serbia’s enemies. Other monitors confirmed that German EU monitors smuggled arms through Croatia and Bosnia.
In 1997, Monitor reported that the mig-21 airplanes used by the Croatian Air Force “demonstrably came from Germany, were given a complete overhaul in the former Soviet Union and delivered to Croatia via Hungary.”
The program also stated, “Combat helicopters, tanks, artillery—many of the weapons that decided the outcome of the war—had been delivered with the help of the bnd, according to information of the American Defense Intelligence Service (dia). This is also confirmed by the internationally acknowledged military expert Paul Beaver.”
The Aug. 11-25, 1995, issue of Intelligence Digest stated that German pilots trained the Croatian Air Force.
The Monitor program also stated, “Without the German intelligence service, the smuggling could not have been accomplished.” The allegations caused an uproar in the German parliament, but as Britain’s Telegraph reported in 1997, “For many German politicians, however, the nub of the problem may not be the bnd’s operations at all—rather that it appears to have been caught out.”
Crucially, German and U.S. help won the Croats the media war. Little Croatia and Bosnia could not have won over the entire Western media without help. Sanctions placed on Yugoslavia meant it was unable to hire Western PR firms. Serbia’s enemies were able to get their message out unopposed.
Karadzic stated that “The media did more damage to us than nato bombs.”


Just the Beginning


Horrific as the events in the Balkans were, they are just the start of an even bigger, far worse conflict. As Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Flurry writes in his booklet The Rising Beast—Germany’s Conquest of the Balkans, “Yugoslavia is in fact the first victim of World War iii.”
“The first blow of World War iii has already been struck,” he writes. “That is because this same nation—Germany—will continue this aggressive war spirit until the whole world is dragged into a nuclear World War iii! So says history and Bible prophecy.”
War means events like the Krajina ethnic cleansing, and Srebrenica. As Churchill described, war means man unleashes all the destructive forces he has available. This time, man has more destructive power at his fingertips than ever before.
The truth is that Bosnia is already a victim of World War III.




E' nata indoona: chiama, videochiama e messaggia Gratis.
Scarica indoona per iPhone, Android e PC



Da: partigiani7maggio@...

Oggetto: Milano venerdi 14/10: presentazione alla Libreria Odradek


I PARTIGIANI JUGOSLAVI NELLA RESISTENZA ITALIANA
Storie e memorie di una vicenda ignorata

Roma, Odradek, 2011
pp.348 - euro 23,00

Per informazioni sul libro si vedano:


---

Tra i nuovi inserimenti sul nostro sito segnaliamo:
Recensione di Ruggero Giacomini, dalla rivista "Storia e problemi contemporanei" n.57/2011

---

Milano, venerdi 14 ottobre 2011, ore 18:00

Libreria Odradek 
Via Principe Eugenio 28

Presentazione del volume

I PARTIGIANI JUGOSLAVI NELLA RESISTENZA ITALIANA
Storie e memorie di una vicenda ignorata

ne discutono: 

Andrea Martocchia
autore, dottore di ricerca in Fisica, esperto di storia recente dei Balcani. E' segretario del Coordinamento Nazionale per la Jugoslavia - onlus

Alessandra Kersevan
storica ed editrice (Edizioni KappaVu), è esperta di questioni del confine orientale e studiosa dei lager per slavi sul territorio italiano

Tiziano Tussi
membro del Comitato provinciale ANPI e collaboratore della rivista Patria Indipendente, è autore di articoli, saggi e libri sulla Guerra di Liberazione

Info: Libreria Odradek Milano
tel. 02 314948 email: odradekmilano@...
http://www.odradek.it/html/librerie/libreriamilano.html

---


I PARTIGIANI JUGOSLAVI NELLA RESISTENZA ITALIANA
Storie e memorie di una vicenda ignorata

di Andrea Martocchia
con contributi di Susanna Angeleri, Gaetano Colantuono, Ivan Pavičevac
Prefazione di Davide Conti
Introduzione di Giacomo Scotti

Roma, Odradek, 2011

pp.348 - euro 23,00 - ISBN 978-88-96487-13-6


Odradek edizioni
via san Quintino 35
00185 Roma
tel/fax 06 70451413
odradek@...
www.odradek.it
http://www.odradek.it/blogs/index.php

Si tratta del risultato di un lavoro collettivo condotto e coordinato con grande impegno e passione. Gli autori, seguendo le tracce degli jugoslavi scappati dopo l’8 settembre del 1943 da vari luoghi di internamento e detenzione, come i campi di Renicci di Anghiari in provincia di Arezzo e di Colfiorito in provincia di Perugia o le carceri di Spoleto,  hanno percorso l’Italia, contattando sedi dell'Anpi e Istituti storici, parlando con studiosi locali e superstiti, visitando luoghi della memoria, raccogliendo documenti e testimonianze... Il libro Partigiani jugoslavi nella resistenza italiana parte da una domanda: «che cosa ci facevano in Italia questi jugoslavi?». Ciò evoca fatti della seconda guerra mondiale (l’occupazione militare nazifascista della Jugoslavia e la nascita e repressione della resistenza agli occupanti), ma conduce anche direttamente nel vivo del sistema concentrazionario dell’Italia fascista, oggetto ultimamente di molti studi, ma a lungo rimosso e perfino apertamente negato... (R. Giacomini)

La ricerca inoltre individua il ruolo strategico della Puglia come “duplice retrovia” anche in relazione alle parallele vicende belliche nei Balcani; ruolo finora noto solo a pochi specialisti e in modo frammentario. Infatti, mentre in Puglia si costituivano brigate dell’EPLJ - Esercito Popolare di Liberazione della Jugoslavia -, gli evasi jugoslavi dai lager della penisola animavano la lotta di Liberazione proprio nelle sue prime fasi lungo la dorsale appenninica, con episodi rilevanti, soprattutto in Umbria e nelle Marche, lasciando sul campo più di mille tra morti e dispersi... Nella ricerca sono inoltre discusse le ragioni politico-storiografiche di questa rimozione, così da fornire un importante contributo al dibattito metodologico sulla storia della Resistenza poiché si oltrepassa la chiave di lettura nazionale, solitamente schiacciata sul rapporto CLN-monarchia-Alleati. (dalla quarta di copertina)

Le altre riflessioni che emergono dalla lettura del testo riguardano da un lato la questione della mancata punizione degli esponenti fascisti e dei vertici del regio esercito italiano responsabili di crimini di guerra contro le popolazioni civili occupate e dall’altro la completa assenza nella sfera pubblica nazionale di una lettura critica del passato, capace di fare i conti con le responsabilità dell’Italia rispetto agli eventi della seconda guerra mondiale. Sul piano internazionale, la collocazione in campi geopolitici contrapposti di Italia e Jugoslavia consentì al governo di Roma, grazie al sostegno degli Alleati anglo-americani, di evitare la consegna dei principali criminali di guerra al governo di Tito, ma parallelamente offrì l’opportunità di non riconoscere il peso e la valenza storico-militare del contributo jugoslavo alla Resistenza antifascista nella Penisola. (dalla Prefazione di Davide Conti)

I dittatori possono seminare odio e guerre, divisioni, distruzioni, morte e dolori (ed altro non sanno fare), ma i popoli alla fine sanno riconoscersi fratelli ed operare insieme, anche combattendo, per abbattere le dittature, costruire la democrazia e la pace. Come fecero i combattenti accorsi in Spagna in difesa della Repubblica combattendo contro Franco, italiani e jugoslavi insieme in alcuni reparti comuni; come fecero circa quarantamila soldati italiani passati nelle file dell’Esercito popolare di Liberazione jugoslavo dopo il settembre del Quarantatre trasformandosi da occupatori in combattenti della libertà col nome di garibaldini; come fecero quasi tutti gli jugoslavi finiti nei campi di internamento creati dal “duce” dando vita ai primi reparti della Resistenza in Italia già nel settembre di quel Quarantatre della svolta. (dalla Introduzione di Giacomo Scotti)

La Brigata Gramsci è un unicum, uno scandalo. Era arrivata a contare quasi 500 effettivi, ma al suo interno aveva un battaglione, il battaglione Tito, formato da combattenti jugoslavi. E i battaglioni Tito divennero due. Alfredo Filipponi, nome di battaglia "Pasquale", comunista ternano ne era il commissario politico, ma il comandante militare era Svetozar "Toso" Lakovic. E quegli Jugoslavi erano in gran parte comunisti. Una brigata comunista al quadrato. Un valore aggiunto che altre formazioni più a nord e più a ovest non hanno avuto. E infatti queste risultarono più cielleniste, più ecumeniche, e più attendiste, direi. La Gramsci dichiarò la prima zona libera. Il 9 febbraio in duecento prendono Norcia senza sparare un colpo... Dovevano fargliela pagare a uno che aveva proclamato la prima Repubblica partigiana. Dal luglio al novembre 1944 ne sorsero una quindicina, elencate nel sito dell'Anpi. Ma la prima non c'è. È ignorata. 
Alfredo Filipponi, la Brigata Gramsci e la prima Zona libera sono uno scandalo, sono impresentabili... (C. Del Bello)


===




E' nata indoona: chiama, videochiama e messaggia Gratis.
Scarica indoona per iPhone, Android e PC



SCAMBIO DI CORTESIE

Come diceva Brecht, ci siamo seduti dalla parte del torto perché tutti gli altri posti erano occupati. Avendo subito un attacco decisamente poco signorile, ho dovuto adeguarmi al linguaggio usato, e chiedo scusa ai lettori.

Claudia Cernigoi

--- 
 
Navigando in rete ho scoperto che il dottore (in biologia) Giorgio Rustia, deve avere davvero un debole per la mia figura, dopo tanti anni che spara a zero (metaforicamente, ovvio) contro di me, facendo ogni volta delle figure piuttosto meschinelle, dato che dimostra di non avere compreso quanto da me scritto (forse perché ha la poco produttiva abitudine di non leggere tutto il brano che intende commentare, ma solo le parti che vuole sputtanare, lasciando fuori pezzi fondamentali per la comprensione del testi).
Insomma ho scoperto che in un profilo face book
egli si distingue sia per la consueta abitudine di riportare solo una frase di quelle da me scritto su un preciso argomento, sia per l’abituale signorilità con cui affronta questi argomenti (che dovrebbero essere storici), in buona compagnia di tale Adriana Defilippi (che non mi sento di definire signora, per cui se ha un titolo accademico lo faccia valere) che così commenta della sottoscritta:
 
Adriana Defilippi Non è l'unica negazionista, minimizzatrice e giustificazionista. Ma lei essendo una tritettuta, lo fa come un toro, o meglio una vacca, a testa bassa.
22 agosto 2010 alle ore 9.28
 
Battuta tanto divertente da eccitare anche il dottor Rustia che così replica:
 
Brava Adriana, mi hai fatto ricordare che Giovannino Guareschi raffigurava i compagni comunisti con tre "busi del naso" e le compagne con tre tettone !!!
22 agosto 2010 alle ore 9.32
 
Prima di entrare nel merito vorrei chiedere, cortesemente, al dottor Rustia e ad Adriana Defilippi di lasciare in pace le mie tette, perché altrimenti potrei pensare di essere oggetto di molestie di tipo sessuale da parte loro.
Ora che abbiamo chiarito che ciascuno si faccia le tette proprie posso entrare nel merito del discorso.
Scrive Rustia che io avrei “cappellato” del 1270% perché ho scritto che dalle foibe della zona di Trieste “furono recuperate 42 salme di persone gettate in varie cavità”, mentre la relazione del SEF (Squadra Esplorazioni Foibe) che io cito parla di 575 salme.
Detta così effettivamente faccio la figura dell’incompetente. Però se il dottor Rustia, invece di pensare alle mie tette, leggesse (o riportasse, perché magari legge e poi falsifica) tutto quello che scrivo potrebbe vedere che io parlo di “42 salme di persone gettate in varie cavità dopo essere state uccise: e qui va precisato questo, perché nell’immaginario generale si evoca l’immagine del disgraziato gettato vivo nella voragine e lasciato morire lentamente, magari incatenato al corpo senza vita di un’altra persona”. E che un paragrafo più avanti cito lo “specchietto” del SEF dal quale risultano 464 (il documento pubblicato da Rustia con 575 salme non so da dove l’abbia tratto, dato che non lo dice) recuperi, dove specifico (abbastanza chiaramente, se uno si dà la briga di leggere): che “Non tutte queste esplorazioni si riferiscono alla provincia di Trieste: De Giorgi si spinse fino a Travesio (attuale provincia di Pordenone), dove da due fosse furono riesumati 12 corpi di persone uccise nel corso del conflitto; altri corpi furono recuperati da sommarie sepolture in fosse (non “foibe”) nella bassa friulana e nel monfalconese (una decina circa, alcuni risultarono essere stati vittime di rapinatori), ed altri (per lo più militari) nella zona corrispondente alla vecchia provincia di Gorizia passata sotto l’amministrazione jugoslava; il maggior numero di salme (156) corrisponde a quelle (quasi tutte di militari) recuperate dalla Jelenca Jama presso Comeno, nell’attuale Slovenia. In realtà, quindi, stando a questi documenti, nella provincia di Trieste furono riesumate una cinquantina di salme di presunti “infoibati” (però va anche rilevato che questo specchietto riporta delle incongruenze: ad esempio dall’abisso Plutone risultano recuperate 21 salme, cosa che non corrisponde agli atti processuali che parlano della riesumazione di 18 corpi). Inoltre una salma, recuperata dalla Grotta di San Lorenzo, apparteneva ad un giovane ex partigiano che fu ucciso nel 1946 molto probabilmente da fascisti, sicuramente non dai suoi compagni di lotta”.
 
Fosse la prima volta che Rustia mi “sputtana” in questo modo, non mi volterei neppure indietro. Ma dato che sono quindici anni che va avanti così, mi viene da pensare che abbia dei problemi nei miei confronti, il che può portare a delle monomanie poco produttive per lo stato psicofisico di una persona, oltretutto abbastanza anziana. Mi spiace davvero che egli si debba rovinare la salute per causa mia, ma non si preoccupi, non gliene serbo rancore.
 


E' nata indoona: chiama, videochiama e messaggia Gratis.
Scarica indoona per iPhone, Android e PC


(english / francais)

http://www.voltairenet.org/Declaration-de-Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad

Déclaration de Mahmoud Ahmadinejad à la 66e Assemblée générale de l’ONU

RÉSEAU VOLTAIRE | NEW YORK (ÉTATS-UNIS) | 22 SEPTEMBRE 2011

Au nom de Dieu, le Compatissant, le Miséricordieux,
« Loué soit Allah, le Seigneur de l’Univers, paix et bénédiction soient sur notre Maître et Prophète, Mahomet, sa pure demeure, ses nobles Compagnons et tous ses divins messagers »
« Ô Dieu, hâte l’arrivée de l’imam Al-Mahdi et accorde lui une bonne santé ainsi que la victoire et fais de nous ses disciples et ceux qui témoignent de sa justesse »
M. le Président,
Excellences,
Mesdames et Messieurs,
Je suis reconnaissant au tout-puissant Allah qui m’a accordé, une fois de plus, l’opportunité de paraître devant cette assemblée mondiale.
J’ai le plaisir d’exprimer mes sincères remerciements à S. Exc. Joseph Deiss, président de la 65ème session pour ses énormes efforts durant sa tenue. Je voudrais également féliciter S. Exc. Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser pour son élection en tant que président de cette 66ème session de l’assemblée générale et je lui souhaite le succès.
Permettez-moi de profiter de ce moment pour rendre hommage à tous ceux qui ont perdu la vie cette année, particulièrement aux victimes de la tragique famine en Somalie et de la dévastatrice épidémie au Pakistan et spécialement du tremblement de terre et les explosions suivantes dans les centrales nucléaires au Japon. J’exhorte chacun à intensifier son assistance et son aide aux populations touchées dans ces pays.
Les années passées, j’ai parlé de différents problèmes mondiaux, et le besoin d’introduire des changements fondamentaux dans l’ordre international actuel.
Aujourd’hui, tenant compte des évolutions internationales, j’essaierai d’analyser la situation actuelle d’un angle différent.
Comme vous le savez tous, la domination et la supériorité des êtres humains sur les créatures se trouvent dans la nature même et la réalité de l’humanité, qui est un don divin et une manifestation de l’esprit divin comprenant : la foi en Dieu, qui est l’éternel créateur et architecte de l’univers ; montrer de la compassion envers les autres, la générosité, la recherche de la justice, faire valoir l’intégrité dans les mots et les actes ; la quête de dignité pour atteindre les sommets de la perfection, l’aspiration à élever la matière et le spirituel de tout un chacun, et le désir d’être libre ; défier l’oppression, la corruption, et la discrimination en supportant les opprimés ; rechercher le bonheur, et la prospérité durable et la sécurité pour tous.
Voici quelques-unes des manifestations des attributs communément humains et divins, que l’on peut clairement observer dans les aspirations historiques des êtres humains, comme le reflète l’héritage de nos recherches dans l’art et les travaux littéraires, prose et poésie, et dans les mouvements socio-culturels et politiques des êtres humains dans la course de l’histoire.
Tous les prophètes divins et réformateurs sociaux ont toujours invité les êtres humains à emprunter ce droit chemin.
Dieu a donné la dignité à l’humanité afin qu’elle élève son statut pour assumer son rôle de successeur sur la Terre.
Chers collègues et amis,
Il est particulièrement clair, que malgré les accomplissements historiques, par exemple la création des Nations Unies, qui a été le produit d’inlassables luttes et d’efforts d’esprits libres et d’individus cherchant la justice autant que de la coopération internationale, les sociétés humaines sont encore loin de satisfaire leurs nobles désirs et aspirations.
La plupart des nations du monde ne sont pas satisfaites des circonstances internationales actuelles.
Et malgré le désir général et l’aspiration à promouvoir la paix, le progrès et la fraternité, des guerres, des meurtres de masse, la pauvreté généralisée, les crises socio-économiques et politiques continuent de porter atteinte aux droits et souveraineté des nations, causant d’irréparables dommages de par le monde.
Trois milliards de personnes environ vivent avec moins de 2,5 dollars par jour, et plus d’un milliard vit sans avoir même un seul repas suffisant par jour. 40 % des populations les plus pauvres du monde se partagent seulement 5 % de la richesse globale, tandis que 20 % des plus riches détient 75 % de la richesse mondiale.
Plus de 20 000 enfants démunis et innocents meurent chaque jour à cause de la pauvreté.
Aux États-Unis, 80 % des ressources financières sont contrôlées par 10 % de la population, alors que 20 % de ces ressources appartient à 90 % de la population.
Quelles sont les causes et les raisons derrière ces inégalités ? Comment remédier à de telles injustices ?
Les dirigeants des cercles de gouvernance globale séparent la vie sociale de l’éthique et de la spiritualité tout en déclarant que la situation est le résultat de la poursuite du chemin de divins prophètes ou de la vulnérabilité des nations ou de la performance malade de petits groupes ou d’individus. Ils proclament que seules leurs opinions et approches peuvent sauver la société humaine.
Chers collègues et amis,
Ne pensez-vous pas que la cause fondamentale des problèmes devrait être considérée dans l’ordre international en vigueur, la manière dont le monde est gouverné ?
J’aimerais porter votre aimable attention sur les questions suivantes :
Qui a enlevé par la force des millions de personnes de leurs maisons en Afrique et d’autres régions du monde durant la sombre période de l’esclavage, faisant d’eux les victimes de leur avidité matérielle ?
Qui a imposé le colonialisme durant 4 siècles dans ce monde ?
Qui a occupé des terres et massivement spolié les ressources d’autres nations, détruisant les talents, les langues traditionnelles, les cultures et les identités de ces nations ?
Qui a déclenché les première et seconde guerres mondiales, qui ont tué 70 millions de personnes et des blessés ou mis à la rue des centaines de millions d’autres ?
Qui a lancé les guerres en Corée et au Vietnam ?
Qui a imposé, au moyen de la tromperie et de l’hypocrisie, le sionisme, et près de 60 ans de guerre, exclusion, terreur, et meurtre de masse sur le peuple Palestinien et les pays de la région ?
Qui a imposé et supporté pendant des décennies des dictatures militaires et des régimes totalitaires en Asie, Afrique et Amérique latine ?
Qui a utilisé la bombe nucléaire contre des personnes sans défense, et possède des milliers de têtes nucléaires dans ses arsenaux ?
Les économies de quels pays reposent sur la guerre et la vente d’armes  ?
Qui a provoqué et encouragé Saddam Hussein à envahir et imposer une guerre de 8 ans à l’Iran, et qui l’a assisté et équipé à déployer des armes chimiques contre nos villes et notre peuple ?
Qui a utilisé l’incident mystérieux du 11 septembre comme un prétexte pour attaquer l’Afghanistan et l’Irak, en tuant, blessant et déplaçant de force des millions de personnes dans ces deux pays, avec comme objectif final la domination sur le Moyen-Orient et ses ressources pétrolières ?
Qui a mis fin au système de Bretton Woods en imprimant des milliards de dollars sans en avoir les réserves ou la monnaie équivalente ? Un changement qui a déclenché l’inflation dans le monde entier et qui avait pour but la prédation sur les gains économiques des autres nations  ?
De quel pays la dépense militaire dépasse annuellement mille milliards de dollars, dépassant les budgets militaires cumulés de tous les autres pays du monde ?
Quels gouvernements sont les plus endettés du monde ?
Qui domine l’élaboration d’établissement des politiques sur l’économie mondiale ?
Qui est responsable pour la récession économique mondiale, et est en train d’imposer ses conséquences sur l’Amérique, l’Europe et le reste du monde ?
Quels gouvernements sont toujours prêts à lancer des milliers de bombes sur d’autres pays, mais tergiversent à fournir de l’aide aux personnes frappées par la pauvreté en Somalie ou d’autres pays ?
Quels sont ceux qui dominent le conseil de sécurité de l’ONU, qui est ostensiblement responsable de la sauvegarde de la sécurité du monde ?
Il existe quantité d’autres questions similaires. Évidemment, les réponses sont claires.
La majorité des nations et des gouvernements du monde n’ont eu aucun rôle dans la création des crises globales actuelles, et donc, elles ont été elles-mêmes victimes de telles politiques.
Il est aussi clair que la lumière du jour que les mêmes esclavagistes et pouvoirs coloniaux qui jadis ont déclenché les deux guerres mondiales ont maintenant causé la misère généralisée et le désordre avec des conséquences à long terme de par le monde depuis lors.
Chers collègues et amis,
Est-ce que ces pouvoirs arrogants ont réellement la compétence et la capacité de diriger ou gouverner le monde ?
Est-il acceptable qu’ils s’appellent eux-mêmes les uniques défenseurs de la liberté, la démocratie et les droits de l’homme, lorsqu’ils attaquent militairement et occupent d’autres pays ?
La fleur de la démocratie peut-être surgir des missiles de l’OTAN et de ses armes ?
Mesdames et Messieurs,
Si certains pays Européens utilisent encore l’Holocauste, après six décennies, comme excuse pour payer une rançon aux sionistes, ne devrait-il pas être une obligation pour les esclavagistes ou pouvoirs coloniaux de donner réparations aux nations concernées ?
Si les dommages et pertes de la période de l’esclavage et du colonialisme étaient compensés, qu’arriverait-il aux manipulateurs et pouvoirs politiques cachés aux États-Unis et en Europe ? Resterait-il des accrocs entre le Nord et Le Sud ?
Si seulement la moitié des dépenses militaires des États-Unis et de ses alliés à l’OTAN étaient prélevés pour aider à résoudre les problèmes économiques dans leurs propres pays, seraient-ils en train d’assister au moindre symptôme de crise économique ?
Qu’arriverait-il si la même somme était offerte aux nations pauvres ?
Quelle est la justification de la présence de centaines de militaires états-uniens et de bases de renseignement dans les différentes parties du monde, incluant 268 bases en Allemagne, 124 au Japon, 87 en Corée du Sud, 83 en Italie, 45 au Royaume-Uni, et 21 au Portugal ? Cela signifie-t-il autre chose que l’occupation militaire ?
Les bombes déployées dans les bases susdites ne mettent-elles pas en danger la sécurité de ces nations ?
Mesdames et Messieurs,
La question principale est la recherche de la cause fondamentale de telles attitudes.
La raison principale devrait être cherchée dans les croyances et les tendances de l’establishment.
Une assemblée de gens en contradiction avec les instincts humains propres et leurs dispositions, qui n’ont aussi aucune foi en Dieu et dans le chemin des divins prophètes justifient leur soif de pouvoir et leurs fins matérialistes par des valeurs divines.
Pour eux, seul le pouvoir et la richesse prévalent, et toute tentative doit amener à ces sinistres objectifs.
Les nations opprimées n’ont aucun espoir de restaurer ou protéger leurs droits légitimes contre ces pouvoirs.
Ces pouvoirs cherchent leur propre progrès, prospérité et dignité tout en imposant la pauvreté, l’humiliation et l’annihilation aux autres.
Ils se considèrent eux-mêmes supérieurs aux autres, jouissant de privilèges spéciaux et de concessions. Ils n’ont aucun respect pour les autres et violent aisément les droits des nations et des gouvernements.
Ils s’autoproclament comme les indiscutables gardiens de tous les gouvernements et nations à travers l’intimidation, recourent à la menace et la force, et abusent des mécanismes internationaux. Ils brisent simplement toutes les régulations internationales reconnues.
Ils insistent pour imposer leur style de vie et leurs croyances aux autres.
Ils appuient officiellement le racisme.
Ils affaiblissent les pays grâce à des interventions militaires, et détruisent leurs infrastructures, dans le but de piller leurs ressources, les rendant encore plus dépendants.
Ils sèment les graines de la haine et de l’hostilité parmi les nations et les peuples par différentes poursuites, afin de les empêcher de remplir leurs objectifs de développement et de progrès.
Toutes les cultures, les identités, les vies, les valeurs et la richesse des nations, femmes, jeunesse, familles, comme richesse des nations, sont sacrifiées à leurs désirs impérialistes et leur plaisir pour l’esclavagisme et la capture.
L’hypocrisie et la tromperie sont autorisées afin de sécuriser leurs intérêts et leurs buts impérialistes. Le trafic de drogues et la mort d’êtres humains innocents sont également autorisés dans la recherche de tels buts diaboliques. Malgré la présence de l’OTAN dans l’Afghanistan occupé, il y a eu une augmentation dramatique de la production de drogues illégales là-bas.
Ils ne tolèrent aucun questionnement ou critique, et au lieu de présenter des raisons pour leurs violations, ils se posent toujours dans la position d’inquisiteurs.
Au moyen de leur réseau de médias impérialistes, sous l’influence du colonialisme, ils menacent quiconque questionne l’holocauste et le 11-Septembre avec des sanctions et des actions militaires.
L’année dernière, lorsqu’un besoin de créer une équipe de recherche pour mener une enquête approfondie concernant les éléments cachés du 11-Septembre s’est mis en place ; une idée également soutenue par tous les gouvernements et nations indépendants, ainsi que la majorité des gens aux États-Unis, mon pays et moi-même avons subi des pressions et des menaces par le gouvernement des États-Unis.
Au lieu de mettre en place une équipe de recherche, ils ont tué le principal responsable et jeté son corps à la mer.
N’aurait-il pas été raisonnable de traduire en justice et de juger le principal responsable de l’événement afin d’identifier les éléments expliquant que les avions détournés pour attaquer les tours jumelles aient pu circuler librement dans l’espace aérien ?
Pourquoi n’aurait-il pas été possible de le traduire en justice afin d’identifier ceux qui ont commandité les groupes terroristes et apporté les guerres et d’autres malheurs dans la région ?
Y a-t-il une quelconque information qui doive être gardée secrète ?
Ils voient le sionisme comme une idée sacrée et une idéologie.
N’importe quelle question concernant sa véritable origine et histoire est condamnée par eux comme un pêché impardonnable. Toutefois ils approuvent et permettent des sacrilèges et des insultes contre les croyances d’autres divines religions.
Chers collègues et amis,
La liberté réelle, la justice, la dignité, le bien-être, et la sécurité durable sont les droits de toute nation.
Ces valeurs ne peuvent être achevées ni par la dépendance sur le système inefficace actuel de gouvernance, ni au travers de l’invasion du monde par des pouvoirs arrogants et les canons des forces de l’OTAN.
Ces valeurs pourront être atteintes seulement à travers l’indépendance et la reconnaissance des droits d’autrui dans l’harmonie et la coopération.
Y a-t-il une quelconque manière de résoudre les problèmes et les défis qui assaillent le monde en utilisant les mécanismes internationaux en vigueur pour aider l’humanité à réaliser ses aspirations de longue date, de sécurité et d’égalité ?
Tous ceux qui ont essayé d’introduire des réformes tout en préservant les normes et tendances en vigueur ont échoué. Les précieux efforts apportés par le mouvement des Non-Alignés, le groupe des 77 et le groupe des 15 tout comme quelques célèbres individus ont échoué à apporter des changements fondamentaux.
La gouvernance et la direction du monde requièrent des réformes fondamentales.
Que devrait-il être fait maintenant ?
Chers collègues et amis,
Des efforts doivent être faits avec une résolution ferme et grâce à la coopération collective pour créer un nouveau plan, sur la base des principes et la fondation même des droits universels humains comme le monothéisme, la justice, la liberté, l’amour et la recherche du bonheur.
L’idée de la création des Nations Unies reste un grand et historique succès pour l’humanité. Son importance doit être appréciée et ses capacités doivent être utilisées le plus possible pour nos nobles objectifs.
Nous ne devrions pas autoriser cette organisation, qui est le reflet de la volonté collective et l’aspiration partagée de la communauté des nations, à dévier de sa course principale et jouer dans les mains des pouvoirs mondiaux.
Un terrain favorable doit être préparé pour assurer la participation collective et l’implication des nations dans un effort pour promouvoir la paix durable et la sécurité.
La gestion partagée et collective du monde doit être réalisée dans sa vraie signification, et basée sur les principes soulignés et consacrés dans la loi internationale. La justice doit servir de critère et de base pour toutes les décisions et actions internationales.
Chacun d’entre nous devrait reconnaitre le fait qu’il n’y a pas d’autre moyen que la gestion partagée et collective du monde pour mettre fin aux désordres actuels, la tyrannie et la discrimination de par le monde.
C’est en fait la seule voie vers la prospérité et le bien-être de la société humaine qui est une vérité établie et vive.
Tout en reconnaissant cette vérité, chacun devrait remarquer que la reconnaissance seule n’est pas assez. Nous devons croire en elle et redoubler d’efforts pour sa réalisation.
Chers collègues et amis,
La gestion partagée et collective du monde est le droit légitime de toutes les nations, et nous en tant que représentants, avons une obligation de défendre leurs droits. Bien que certains pouvoirs essayent en permanence de bloquer tout effort international destiné à promouvoir la coopération collective, nous devons, toutefois, renforcer notre foi dans l’accomplissement de ce but poursuivi qui est d’établir une gestion partagée et collective du monde.
Les Nations Unies ont été créées pour mettre en place une participation effective de toutes les nations dans les processus de prise de décision internationale.
Nous savons tous que cet objectif n’a pas encore été rempli à cause de l’absence de justice dans les structures de gestion actuelle et des mécanismes de l’ONU.
La composition du conseil de sécurité est injuste et inéquitable. Par conséquent, des changements incluant la restructuration des Nations Unies sont considérés comme les demandes basiques des nations auxquelles qui doivent être posées par l’assemblée générale.
Durant la session de l’année dernière, j’ai insisté sur l’importance de cet objectif et appelé pour la désignation de la décennie actuelle comme la décennie de la gestion globale partagée et collective.
J’aimerais réitérer encore ma proposition. Je suis convaincu qu’à travers la coopération internationale, la vigilance, et les efforts des leaders mondiaux et des gouvernements, et en insistant sur la nécessité de la justice et l’appui des autres nations, nous puissions jeter les bases d’un brillant futur commun.
Ce mouvement est certainement sur son droit chemin de création, assurant un futur prometteur pour l’humanité.
Un futur qui sera construit lorsque l’humanité commencera à emprunter le chemin des divins prophètes et des justes sous le commandement de l’Imam Al-Mahdi, le sauveur ultime de l’humanité et l’héritier de tous les messagers divins et des meneurs et la génération pure de notre grand prophète.
La création d’une suprême et idéale société avec l’arrivée d’un être humain parfait qui est un vrai et sincère amoureux de tous les droits de l’homme, est la promesse garantie d’Allah.
Il viendra accompagné de Jésus Christ afin de mener les amoureux de la liberté et de la justice pour détruire la tyrannie et la discrimination, et promouvoir le savoir, la paix, la justice, la paix au travers du monde.
Il présentera à chaque individu toutes les merveilles du monde et toutes les bonnes choses qui amèneront le bonheur à l’humanité.
Aujourd’hui les nations se sont réveillées. Avec l’augmentation de la prise de conscience publique, elles ne subiront plus très longtemps les oppressions et les discriminations.
Le monde est désormais en train d’assister plus que jamais, au réveil étendu dans les terres islamiques, en Asie, en Europe, en Amérique. Ces mouvements leur ouvrent l’esprit un peu plus chaque jour et influencent la poursuite de la réalisation de la justice, de la liberté et la création d’un meilleur futur.
Notre grande nation se tient prête à joindre les mains à celles des autres nations pour emprunter ce magnifique chemin dans l’harmonie et en symbiose avec les aspirations partagées de l’humanité.
Laissez-nous saluer l’amour, la liberté, la justice, la sagesse et le futur merveilleux qui attend l’humanité.
Merci.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad


---

(source: http://cirqueminimeparis.blogspot.com/2011/09/change-of-address-post-full-text-of.html )

FULL TEXT of President Ahmadinejad's Address to the UN General Assemble, 22 September 2011.

The full text of the speech follows, courtesy of the United Nations:

Mr. President,
Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am grateful to the Almighty Allah who granted me, once more, the opportunity to appear before this world assembly. I have the pleasure to express my sincere thanks to H.E. Joseph Deiss, president of the sixty-fifth session for his tremendous efforts during his tenure. I also would like to congratulate H.E Nassir Abdulaziz AI-Nasser on his election as the president of sixty-sixth session of the General Assembly and wish him all success.

Let me seize the moment to pay tribute to all those who lost their lives in the past year, particularly to the victims of the tragic famine in Somalia and the devastating flood in Pakistan and especially the earthquake and the ensuing explosions in the nuclear power plant in Japan. I urge everyone to intensify their assistance and aid to the affected populations in these countries.

Over the past years, I spoke about different global issues, and the need to introduce fundamental changes in the current international order.

Today, considering the international developments, I will try to analyze the present situation from a different angle. As you all know the dominance and superiority of human beings over other creatures, lie in the very nature and the truth of humankind which is a divine gift and a manifestation of the divine spirit including: faith in God, who is the ever-lasting creator and planner of the entire universe.

Showing compassion to others, generosity, justice-seeking, and having integrity both in words and in deeds.

The quest for dignity to reach the pinnacles of perfection, the aspiration to elevate one's material and spiritual status, and the longing to realize liberty; Defying oppression, corruption, and discrimination in trying to support the oppressed; Seeking happiness, and lasting prosperity and security for all.

These are some of the manifestations of common divine and human attributes which can clearly be seen in the historical aspirations of human beings as reflected in the heritage of our search for art and literary works both in prose and poetry, and in the socio-cultural and political movements of human beings in the course of history.

All divine prophets and social reformers invited human beings to tread on this righteous path. God has given dignity to humankind to elevate his status to assume his successor role on Earth.

It is vividly clear that despite all historical achievements, including creation of the United-Nations, which was a product of untiring struggles and efforts of free-minded and justice-seeking individuals as well as the international cooperation, human societies are yet far from fulfilling their noble desires and aspirations.

Most nations of the world are unhappy with the current international circumstances. And despite the general longing and aspiration to promote peace, progress, and fraternity, wars, mass-murder, widespread poverty, and socioeconomic and political crises continue to infringe upon the rights and sovereignty of nations, leaving behind irreparable damage worldwide.

Approximately, three billion people of the world live on less than 2.5 dollars a day, and over a billion people live without having even one sufficient meal on a daily basis. Forty-percent of the poorest world populations only share five percent of the global income, while twenty percent of the richest people share seventy-five percent of the total global income.

More than twenty thousand innocent and destitute children die every day in the world because of poverty. In the United States, eighty percent of financial resources are controlled by ten percent of its population, while only twenty percent of these resources belong to the ninety percent of the population.

What are the causes and reasons behind these inequalities? How can bone remedy such injustice?

The rulers of the global management circles divide the social life from ethics and spirituality while claiming the situation is the outcome of the pursuit of the path of divine prophets or the vulnerability of nations or the ill performance of a few groups or individuals. They claim that only their views and approaches can save the human society.

Wouldn't you think that the root cause of the problems must be sought in the prevailing international order, or the way the world is governed? I would like to draw your kind attention to the following questions:

Who abducted forcefully tens of millions of people from their homes in Africa and other regions of the world during the dark period of slavery, making them a victim of their materialistic greed?

Who imposed colonialism for over four centuries upon this world?

Who occupied lands and massively plundered resources of other nations, destroyed talents, and alienated languages, cultures and identities of nations?

Who triggered the first and second world wars, that left seventy millions killed and hundreds of millions injured or homeless. Who created the wars in Korean peninsula and in Vietnam?

Who imposed, through deceits and hypocrisy, the Zionism and over sixty years of war, homelessness, terror and mass murder on the Palestinian people and on countries of the region?

Who imposed and supported for decades military dictatorship and totalitarian regimes on Asian, African, and Latin American nations?

Who used nuclear bomb against defenseless people, and stockpiled thousands of warheads in their arsenals?

Whose economies rely on waging wars and selling arms?

Who provoked and encouraged Saddam Hussein to invade and impose an eight-year war on Iran, and who assisted and equipped him to deploy chemical weapons against our cities and our people?

Who used the mysterious September 11 incident as a pretext to attack Afghanistan and Iraq , killing, injuring, and displacing millions in two countries with the ultimate goal of bringing into its domination the Middle East and its oil resources?

{HERE the US delegation picks up its shit and starts to walk out}

Who nullified the Breton Woods system by printing trillions of dollars without the backing of gold reserves or equivalent currency? A move that triggered inflation worldwide and was intended to prey on the economic gains of other nations?

Which country's military spending exceeds annually a thousand billion dollars, more than the military budgets of all countries of the world combined?

Which governments are the most indebted ones in the world?

Who dominates the policy-making establishments of the world economy?

Who are responsible for the world economic recession, and are imposing the consequences on America, Europe and the world in general?

Which governments are always ready to drop thousands of bombs on other countries, but ponder and hesitate to provide aid to famine-stricken people in Somalia or in other places?

Who are the ones dominating the Security Council which is ostensibly responsible for safeguarding the international security?

There exist tens of other similar questions. Of course, the answers are clear.

The majority of nations and governments of the world have had no role in the creation of the current global crises, and as a matter of fact, they were themselves the victims of such policies.

It is as lucid as daylight that the same slave masters and colonial powers that once instigated the two world wars have caused widespread misery and disorder with far-reaching effects across the globe since then.

Dear Colleagues and Friends;

Do these arrogant powers really have the competence and ability to run or govern the world. Is it acceptable that they call themselves the sole defender of freedom, democracy, and human rights, while they militarily attack and occupy other countries?

Can the flower of democracy blossom from NATO's missiles, bombs and guns?

Ladies and Gentlemen;

If some European countries still use the Holocaust, after six decades, as the excuse to pay fine or ransom to the Zionists, should it not be an obligation upon the slave masters or colonial powers to pay reparations to the affected nations?

{HERE the rest of IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH delegations begin their protracted walkout.}

If the damage and losses of the period of slavery and colonialism were indeed compensated, what would happen to the manipulators and behind-the-scene political powers in the United States and in Europe? Would there remain any gaps between the North and the South?

If only half of military expenditures of the United States and its allies in NATO was shifted to help solve the economic problems in their own countries, would they be witnessing any symptom of the economic crisis?

What would happen, if the same amount was allocated to poor nations?

What is the justification for the presence of hundreds of US military and intelligence bases in different parts of the world, including 268 bases in Germany, 124 in Japan, 87 in South Korea, 83 in Italy, 45 in the United Kingdom, and 21 in Portugal? Does this mean anything other than military occupation?

Don't the bombs deployed in the said bases undermine the security of other nations?

The main question is the quest for the root cause of such attitudes. The prime reason should be sought in the beliefs and tendencies of the establishment. An assembly of people in contradiction with the inner human instincts and disposition who also have no faith in God and in the path of the divine prophets, replace their lust for power and materialistic ends with heavenly values.

To them, only power and wealth prevail, and every attempt must bring into focus these sinister goals.

Oppressed nations have no hope to restore or protect their legitimate rights against these powers. These powers seek their progress, prosperity and dignity through imposing poverty, humiliation and annihilation to others.

They consider themselves superior to others, enjoying special privileges and concessions. They have no respect for others and easily violate the rights of all nations and governments.

They proclaim themselves as the indisputable custodians of all governments and nations through intimidation, recourse to threat and force, and abuse the international mechanisms. They simply break all the internationally recognized regulations.

They insist on imposing their lifestyle and beliefs on others. They officially support racism. They weaken countries through military intervention, and destroy their infrastructures, in order to plunder their resources by making them all the more dependent.

They sow the seeds of hate and hostility among nations and people of different pursuits, in order to prevent them from fulfilling their goals of development and progress.

All cultures, identities, lives, values and wealth of nations, women, youth, families as well as the wealth of nations are sacrificed to their imperialistic tendencies and their inclination to enslave and captivate others.

Hypocrisy and deceit are allowed in order to secure their interests and imperialistic goals. Drug- trafficking and killing of innocent human beings are also allowed in pursuit of such diabolic goals. Despite NATO's presence in the occupied Afghanistan, there has been a dramatic increase in the production of illicit drugs there.

They tolerate no question or criticism, and instead of presenting a reason for their violations, they always put themselves in the position of a claimant. By using their imperialistic media network which is under the influence of colonialism they threaten anyone who questions the Holocaust and the September 11 event with sanctions and military action.

Last year, when the need to form a fact-finding team to undertake a thorough investigation concerning the hidden elements involved in September 11 incident was brought up; an idea also endorsed by all independent governments and nations as well as by the majority in the United States, my country and myself came under pressure and threat by the government of the United States.

Instead of assigning a fact-finding team, they killed the main perpetrator and threw his body into the sea.

Would it not have been reasonable to bring to justice and openly bring to trial the main perpetrator of the incident in order to identify the elements behind the safe space provided for the invading aircraft to attack the twin world trade towers?

Why should it not have been allowed to bring him to trial to help recognize those who launched terrorist groups and brought wars and other miseries into the region?

Is there any classified information that must be kept secret?

They view Zionism as a sacred notion and ideology. Any question concerning its very foundation and history is condemned by them as an unforgivable sin.

However they endorse and allow sacrileges and insult against beliefs of other divine religions.

Dear Colleagues and Friends;

Real freedom, justice" dignity, well being, and lasting security are the rights of all nations. These values can neither be achieved by reliance on the current inefficient system of world governance, nor through the invasion of the world by arrogant powers and the gun barrels of NATO forces.

These values could only be realized through independence and recognition of others' rights and through harmony and cooperation.
Is there any way to address the problems and challenges besetting the world by using the prevailing international mechanisms and tools to help humanity achieve the long-standing aspiration of peace, security and equality?

All those who tried to introduce reforms whilst preserving the existing norms and tendencies have failed. The valuable efforts made by the Non-Aligned movement and Group 77 and GrouplS as well as by some prominent individuals have failed to bring fundamental changes.
Governance and management of the world require fundamental reforms.

What should be done now?

Dear Colleagnes and Friends;

Efforts must be made with a firm resolve and through collective cooperation to map out a new plan, on the basis of principles and the very foundation of universal human values such as Monotheism, justice, freedom, love and the quest for happiness.

The idea of creation of the United Nations remains a great and historical achievement of mankind. Its importance must be appreciated and its capacities must be used to the extent possible for our noble goals.

We should not allow this organization which is the reflection of the collective will and shared aspiration of the community of nations, to deviate from its main course and play into the hands of the world powers.

Conducive ground must be prepared to ensure collective participation and involvement of nations in an effort to promote lasting peace and security.

Shared and collective management of the world must be achieved in its true sense, and based on the underlying principles enshrined in the international law. Justice must serve as the criterion and the basis for all international decisions and actions.

All of us should acknowledge the fact that there is no other way than the shared and collective management of the world in order to put an end to the present disorders, tyranny, and discriminations worldwide.
This is indeed the sole way to prosperity and welfare of human society which is an established and vivid truth.

While acknowledging the above truth, one should note that acknowledgement alone is not enough. We must believe in it and spare no effort toward its realization.

Dear Colleagues and Friends;

Shared and collective management of the world is the legitimate right of all nations, and we as their representatives, have an obligation to defend their rights. Although some powers continuously try to frustrate all international efforts aimed at promoting collective cooperation, we must, however, strengthen our belief in achieving the perceived goal of establishing a shared and collective cooperation to run the world.

The United Nations was created to make effective participation of all nations in international decision-making processes, possible. We all know that this goal has not yet been fulfilled because of the absence of justice in the current management structures and mechanisms of the UN.

The composition of the Security Council is unjust and inequitable. Therefore, changes including the restructuring of the United Nations are considered the basic demands of the nations that must be addressed by the General Assembly.

During last year session, I emphasized the importance of this issue and called for the designation of the current decade as the decade of shared and collective Global Management.

I would like to reiterate again my proposal. I am sure that through international cooperation, diligence and efforts by committed world leaders and governments and through insisting on the realization of justice and the support of all other nations, we can expedite the building of a common bright future.

This movement is certainly on its rightful path of creation, ensuring a promising future for humanity. A future that will be built when humanity initiates to trend the path of the divine prophets and the righteous under the leadership of Imam al-Mahdi, the Ultimate Savior of mankind and the inheritor to all divine messengers and leaders and to the pure generation of our great Prophet.

The creation of a supreme and ideal society with the arrival of a perfect human being who is a true and sincere lover of all human beings, is the guaranteed promise of Allah.

He will come alongside with Jesus Christ to lead the freedom and justice lovers to eradicate tyranny and discrimination, and promote knowledge, peace, justice freedom and love across the world. He will present to every single individual all the beauties of the world and all good things which bring happiness for humankind.

Today nations have been awakened. With the increase in public awareness,they no longer succumb to oppressions and discriminations.

The world is now witnessing more than ever, the widespread awakening in Islamic lands, in Asia, Europe, and America. These movements are ever expanding their spirit everyday and influence the pursuit of the realization of justice, freedom and the creation of a better tomorrow.

Our great nation stands ready to join hands with other nations to march on this beautiful path in harmony and in line with the shared aspirations of mankind.

Let us salute love, freedom, justice, wisdom, and the bright future that awaits humankind.

Thank you.


E' nata indoona: chiama, videochiama e messaggia Gratis.
Scarica indoona per iPhone, Android e PC