Various civic associations In Belgrade (Club of Generals and admirals of Serbia, Belgrade Forum, Veterans organizations and many others) started marking 11th anniversary of NATO aggression against Serbia (FRY). 
On March 23rd the Generals and Admirals Club promoted three volumes study titled “Armed Forces of FR of Yugoslavia in defense from NATO Aggression in 1999” (700 pages). March 24rth many Civic organizations participated in the ceremonies of laying flowers on the monuments and graveyards to over 3.500 direct victims of the 78 days of aggression. On March 26th, Belgrade Forum is promoting international study titled “NATO aggression – the Twilight of the West” (530 pages) written by about 70 Serbian and authors from all over the world. Similar activities are continuing in Serbia until 10th of June this year, 11th anniversary of ending the NATO aggression.

PHOTO GALLERY: http://picasaweb.google.com/beoforum/11E

---

=== 3 ===

http://english.ruvr.ru/2010/03/28/5732404.html

Voice of Russia - March 28, 2010

Russian sappers defusing NATO explosives in Serbia


A joint Russian-Serbian mine-clearing team has launched an operation to clear the Serbian territories of ammunition which remained after the NATO bombings in 1999. 

According to a spokesman for the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry, Yury Brazhnikov, the squad has been working in the area of the town of Parachin, where the Serbian leg of the South Stream pipeline will run. 

The mine-clearing team comprises 34 people, including 18 sappers of the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry. They have already checked the area of 50,000 square meters and defused 12 explosives. 

---

http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=14450754&PageNum=0

Itar-Tass - October 20, 2009

Russia, Serbia to set up joint mine clearing squad

MOSCOW: Russia and Serbia will set up a joint mine-clearing team to clear Serb territories of ammunition which remained after the NATO bombings in 1999. 

"In cooperation with Serbia, I'd like to note the setting up of a Russian-Serb mine-clearing squad which may begin to work from March 2010," director of the international department under the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry Yuri Brazhnikov told Itar-Tass on Tuesday. 

The main task of the squad is to "decrease the danger of mines and lower the risks for the companies that were bombed." 

"This will provide for the reclamation of many Serb lands and economic facilities," Brazhnikov added. 

He reminded that the Russian squad has been conducting a large operation to clear Serb territories of mines since 2008, including in the area through which the Serb stretch of the South Stream pipeline will run. 

Last year, Russian experts were working in the area of the Nis airfield, having rendered harmless hundreds of explosion-dangerous objects. 

This year, engineers have examined 819,000 square kilometers of territory, and found and destroyed over 730 mines. 

Brazhnikov underlined that "Serbia appreciates the work of the team of sappers from the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry, providing to it comprehensive support." 

On Tuesday, Russia and Serbia signed an agreement on cooperation in the field of emergency humanitarian response, prevention of disasters and man-made accidents and elimination of their consequences. The signing ceremony took place after the talks in Belgrade between the Presidents of the two countries - Dmitry Medvedev and Boris Tadic. 

 

Na inicijativu članova koordinacionog tijela Udruženja "Naša Jugoslavija" u Zagrebu je dana 21. 03. 2010. godine održan osnivački skup Saveza Jugoslavena. Zadatak koji su prisutni pred sebe postavili jeste provoñenje aktivnosti koje će omogućiti da se nacionalnost Jugoslaven uvrsti u red službeno priznatih nacija u svim zemljama nastalim na području nekadašnje SFRJ. Kao sve ostale nacionalnosti tako i Jugoslaveni imaju pravo na udruživanje, javno izjašnjavanje, opredjeljenje prilikom popisa stanovništva ili pak organizovanje u razne društvene organizacije. I Jugoslaveni imaju pravo na očuvanje kulturnog identiteta, istorijske, umjetničke, jezične i književne baštine. 

 

Savez Jugoslavena će svoje djelatnosti usmjeriti u pravcu otvaranja javne rasprave o pravima Jugoslavena i njihove aktivne uloge u izgradnji demokratskog društva – temama koje su već dugi niz godina u javnosti negativno predstavljane ili potpuno tabuizirane. Jugoslaveni postoje, ponosni su na svoje opredjeljenje i jedina su alternativa nacionalizmu – jedinstven je stav osnivača Saveza. 

 

Osnivačkim skupom i formiranjem Saveza pripadnici nacionalnosti Jugoslavena nedvosmisleno su potvrdili neophodnost i opravdanost osnivanja jedne krovne organizacije u kojoj svoje mjesto mogu pronaći svi koji se osjećaju kao Jugoslaveni, tako se izjašnjavaju ili žele izjašnjavati.  

 

Osnovni zadatak Saveza je objediniti sve Jugoslavene bez obzira na njihovo političko, vjersko, polno ili bilo koje drugo opredjeljenje. Ciljevi i aktivnosti Saveza usmjereni su u pravcu njegovanja kulture i jezika Jugoslavena, njihovih običaja i tradicije, prezentacije kulturnih tekovina, razvijanja prijateljskih odnosa sa svim ostalim narodima, edukacija i vaspitanje mladih, jačanje veza sa Jugoslavenima koji žive širom svijeta, zauzimanje za meñusobno razumijevanje, toleranciju i poštovanje osnovnih ljudskih prava na slobodu, javno izjašnjavanje i opredjeljenje – prava koja su svakom pojedincu zagarantovana ustavima svih demokratskih država i meñunarodnim pravnim aktima.  

 

Savez Jugoslavena stoji čvrsto na stanovištu da je neophodno potrebno aktivno i neposredno raditi na prevazilaženju nacionalnih podjela, približavanju ratom zavañenih naroda na prostorima nekadašnje SFRJ, na stvaranju prijateljskih odnosa. Govor nacionalističke mržnje mora biti zamijenjen jezikom ljubavi i pomirenja. Posebnu pažnju pri tome treba posvetiti otvorenim razmjenama mišljenja o uzrocima nedavnih ratnih sukoba, a sa ciljem njihove sveobuhvatne analize što će neumitno dovesti do prevazilaženja nesporazuma i uspostavljanja povjerenja. 

 

Jugoslavenstvo predstavlja simbiozu svih zajedničkih karakteristika podneblja na kojem žive svi naši narodi, a Jugoslaveni posjeduju emotivni prostor pripadanja i poistovjećivanja sa jednim (Jugoslavenskim) identitetom, koji na poseban način obilježava naš mentalitet, naše istorijsko i kulturno naslijeñe i čiji je potencijal veliki i neprocjenjivo vrijedan. Jugoslavenstvo prevazilazi autističku moć razmišljanja svih koji su sami sebe ograničli „čistim“ i jednonacionalnim obilježjima ili uskogrudom ideologijom. To je suviše napredna ideja da bismo mogli očekivati da bude adekvatno shvaćena i prihvaćena od onih, koji na nju gledaju sa agresivnom arogancijom. Da li je to strah od boljeg? 

 

Pripadnici nacionalnosti Jugoslaven su u nekadašnjoj SFRJ, koja je kao i sve druge zemlje imala svojih dobrih i loših strana, imali priliku da budu ravnopravni svim drugim narodima i narodnostima, da učestvuju u njenoj izgradnji i razvoju, da zajedno sa svim drugima razvijaju svoje sposobnosti, izučavaju škole, proširuju znanje, imali su priliku da žive u zemlji u kojoj je čovjek stajao ispred profita, u društvu u kome je drugarstvo bilo važnije od egoizma i gdje je pripadnost cjelokupnoj zajednici bilo važnije od krutih i ograničenih nacionalističkih stega. Jugoslaveni nepokolebljivo vjeruju u kreativnost i pozitivnu dinamiku južnoslavenskih prostora i nisu opterećeni pečatima istorijske zaostavštine i potenciranja neznatnih razlika meñu plemenima, već daju prednost elementima spajanja duge evropske kulturne tradicije, a kao rezultat takvih nastojanja i pogleda pojavljuje se specifičnost zajedničkog identiteta, koji je apsolutno nezavisan od nekih starih ili nekih novih granica, te time po ko zna koji put na djelu dokazuje da granice ne postoje na kartama već isključivo u glavama ljudi.  

 

Često se i danas, s manje ili više prava, zna reći da smo u nekadašnjoj SFRJ živjeli s one strane „gvozdene zavjese“ i da smo samo s vremena na vrijeme bili shvaćeni i primijećeni. Pa, ipak su naša dostignuća u sferama muzike sporta, filma, književnosti bila i te kako prihvaćena i priznata širom svijeta. Pokazalo je to da Jugoslaveni posjeduju ogroman potencijal i da apsolutno zaslužuju da im se pruži objektivna mogućnost za dalji razvoj, koja im nije data. Jugoslaveni osjećaju potrebu i preuzimaju obavezu da svoje kulturno, istorijsko, jezičko, običajno i svako drugo nasljeñe objektivno i bez predrasuda proučavaju sopstvenim snagama i da ga predstave i prikažu svijetu bez miješanja pretencioznih posmatrača iz krutih i nadasve isključivih jednonacionalnih krugova. U našem, ali prevashodno u interesu budućih generacija je da istina preživi nezavisno od toga koliko ona bila bolna. 

Jugoslaveni priznaju i prihvataju čovjeka bez obzira na njegovu nacionalnu ili vjersku pripadnost, boju kože, polno ili bilo koje drugo opredjeljenje i bore se za ravnopravnost, jednakost i prosperitet svih koji žive na prostorima nekadašnje SFRJ. Istovremeno ne traže ništa više nego tolerantan odnos i akceptiranje prava na pripadnost nacionalnosti Jugoslaven. 

 

Jugoslavenstvo predstavlja svojevrstan modus zajedničkog života na našim prostorima i posjeduje ogroman integracioni potencijal, koji je djelimično došao do izražaja u toku trajanja zajedničkog života u nekadašnjoj SFRJ. Ekvivalent zajedništvu je i svakim danom sve vidljivija ekonomska zavisnost i upućenost jednih prema drugima. Nasljedstvo obavezuje, a ono u čemu smo uživali jeste činjenica da su grañanima mnogo više od materijalnog bogatstva značile mogućnosti besplatnog školovanja i liječenja. Opismenjavanje je omogućilo mnogo veću socijalnu pokretljivost  

 

Osnovna osobina Jugoslavenstva jeste njegova heterogenost i otvorenost prema drugom i drugačijem. 

Jednakost nezavisna od boje kože, polne pripadnosti, religiozne opredjeljenosti ili svake druge orjentacije obogaćuje ovaj kompleksni fenomen, prikazuje ga u svjetlu izrazito pozitivne istorijske i socijalno-kulturne dinamike, a iznad nazadne i primitivne ograničenosti nacionalizma, odnosno jednonacionalne samozadovoljnosti i besperpektivnosti. Jugoslavenstvo znači otvoreno govoriti o ravnopravnosti svake vrste, istinito prikazivati istorijske činjenice, ponositi se zajedničkim jezikom i porijeklom, zajedničkom borbom za osloboñenje, zajedničkom izgradnjom razrušene domovine... Ideja Jugoslavenstva potiče još iz 19 vijeka, duboko je ukorijenjena u karakterologiju naroda na ovim prostorima i ostavila je neizbrisiv trag meñu svima nama.  

 

Jugoslaveni ne žele da budu oruñe u rukama drugih, kojima se barata na način njima stran i neželjen, ne žele da ih se svojata i postavlja čas na ovu, čas na onu stranu, kako kome u odreñenom trenutku odgovara.  

 

Osećaj nacionalne pripadnosti stvar je slobodnog izjašnjavanja i pravo svakog pojedinca. Zašto bi to pravo, koje je dozvoljeno velikoj većini, bilo uskraćeno Jugoslavenima? Postojeća ustavna i zakonska regulativa svih država nastalih na području nekadašnje SFRJ oslanja se na meñunarodne akte o ljudskim pravima i to prije svega na Povelju o pravima čovjeka organizacije UN i Evropsku konvenciju o ljudskim pravima, što ih obavezuje na postupanje po istim.  

 

Svi iznijeti stavovi i ciljevi u skladu su sa demokratskim principima jačanja civilnog društva i predstavljaće osnovu rada Saveza Jugoslavena.  

 

Poručujemo i pozivamo sve Jugoslavene, kao i sve koji se Jugoslavenima osjećaju da nam se pridruže i daju svoj doprinos u zajedničkim nastojanjima.  

 

Naša adresa je savez-jugoslavena@... 

 

Za Press službu 

Udruženja „Naša Jugoslavija“ 

Dalibor Tomić i Zlatko Stojković dipl.ing. 

Per la pace, no alla NATO!
 
Risoluzione di 13 partiti comunisti, in vista del Vertice NATO di Lisbona

http://www.pcp.pt - http://www.lernesto.it/index.aspx?m=77&f=2&IDArticolo=19257
Traduzione a cura della redazione di l’Ernesto online

I 13 Partiti partecipanti alla Riunione del Gruppo di Lavoro degli Incontri Internazionali dei Partiti Comunisti e Operai sono i primi firmatari della Risoluzione proposta dal Partito Comunista Portoghese dal titolo “Per la Pace, No alla NATO”. Il documento, approvato nel corso della Riunione, sarà sottoposto alla firma di tutti i Partiti che partecipano al processo degli Incontri Internazionali dei Partiti Comunisti e Operai, con l’obiettivo di trasformarlo in un ampio e rappresentativo appello mondiale di lotta per la pace, contro il militarismo e la NATO.

Risoluzione

In un quadro segnato dall’approfondimento della crisi generale del capitalismo, dall’inasprimento dello sfruttamento dei lavoratori e dei popoli, dalle rivalità interimperialiste e da complessi processi di ridislocazione delle forze sul piano internazionale, l’imperialismo si lancia in nuove derive antidemocratiche e interventi militaristi e avanza soluzioni di forza nel tentativo di perpetuarsi e difendere i suoi interessi di classe.
L’offensiva militarista che ha come protagonisti le potenze imperialiste e la NATO ha un carattere globale e multiforme.
Si intensifica la guerra imperialista con il pretesto di combattere il terrorismo.
Si consolidano i blocchi imperialisti, come la NATO. Si accelera la militarizzazione dell’Unione Europea, con l’adozione fraudolenta del Trattato di Lisbona in cui è plasmata la concezione dell’Unione Europea come pilastro europeo della NATO. Proseguono la corsa agli armamenti e gli investimenti in nuove e più micidiali armi. Le spese militari raggiungono cifre record, in particolare negli USA e nell’Unione Europea. Si espandono le zone di influenza della NATO e delle alleanze strategico-militari imperialiste, in particolare attraverso le cosiddette “partnership per la pace”, in Asia, nei territori dell’ex Unione Sovietica e anche in Africa.

Si espande la rete mondiale delle basi militari degli USA e dei paesi della NATO e si progetta la dislocazione di forze militari dall’America Latina all’Africa; dal Medio Oriente, l’Oceano Indiano e l’Asia Centrale all’Est europeo, al Caucaso e al Mar Nero.
Proseguono le occupazioni dell’Afghanistan e dell’Iraq e si scatenano aggressioni militari contro vari paesi. Si succedono le cospirazioni e le manovre di ingerenza in America Latina e in diversi paesi del continente africano e si moltiplicano le provocazioni, come in Libano. La questione palestinese continua a non trovare soluzione, come pure quella del Sahara Occidentale, e continuano ad essere impuniti i crimini imperialisti. Si intensificano le provocazioni nei confronti della Repubblica Popolare Cinese, di cui la vendita di armamento a Taiwan da parte degli USA è un esempio particolarmente grave, e le minacce a paesi come Iran e Siria.
Si intensificano gli attacchi alla sovranità di Stati, in particolare attraverso le modifiche delle frontiere, di cui l’autoproclamata indipendenza della provincia serba del Kosovo è un grave esempio. Il Diritto Internazionale, prodotto dalla sconfitta del nazifascismo nella Seconda Guerra Mondiale, è seriamente messo in causa e sottoposto ad un processo che mira alla sua distruzione.

In nome della “sicurezza” e della “lotta al terrorismo” si promuovono derive sicuritarie, si istiga al nazionalismo xenofobo e all’intolleranza religiosa e culturale, si commettono crimini contro i diritti umani, come anche contro quelli economici, sociali, democratici e di partecipazione e organizzazione politica e sociale; si sviluppano campagne anticomuniste e si perseguitano le forze che resistono all’offensiva dell’imperialismo e difendono i diritti sociali e nazionali dei popoli.

La realtà mondiale all’inizio del XXI secolo smentisce le campagne di riabilitazione dell’immagine dell’imperialismo nordamericano scatenate attorno all’elezione di Barack Obama. La natura e gli obiettivi della politica degli USA e della NATO sono oggi chiari: dominio delle risorse naturali ed energetiche, controllo delle tecnologie, espansione dei mercati, dominio militare e geo-strategico. Ossia, una risposta di forza all’indebolimento della posizione degli USA sul piano internazionale. La retorica del “multilateralismo” e del “dialogo” è smascherata dalla politica bellicista e interventista degli USA, dell’Unione Europea e della NATO, dall’offensiva imperialista in corso e dal rischio reale di nuovi conflitti militari dal Medio Oriente e l’Asia Centrale all’America Latina. Nonostante gli antagonismi tra USA e Unione Europea, entrambi convergono nell’offensiva contro i diritti sociali e nazionali dei popoli.

La guerra e l’aggressione sono l'altra faccia della globalizzazione economica imperialista e la NATO rappresenta un elemento centrale della sua strategia di dominazione egemonica e di persecuzione delle forze e dei paesi che vi si oppongono. La NATO svolge un ruolo centrale nella militarizzazione delle relazioni internazionali e nella corsa agli armamenti, rappresentando il principale motore dei conflitti e della tensione che segnano il momento attuale. Alludendo a “nuove minacce globali” – concetto che ha sostituito il vecchio pretesto del “pericolo comunista” –, la NATO impone una scalata bellica e degli armamenti di grandi dimensioni – di cui la guerra in Afghanistan è un elemento centrale.

La NATO celebrerà in novembre in Portogallo un Vertice in cui intende rinnovare la sua concezione strategica e che rappresenterà un nuovo ed estremamente pericoloso salto qualitativo nel ruolo, nella missione e negli obiettivi dell’Organizzazione.
Con la sua nuova concezione strategica la NATO intende convertire in dottrina quello che già rappresenta la sua pratica: allargare il dominio territoriale del suo intervento e della sua proiezione di forze a tutto il globo; ampliare l’ambito delle sue missioni a questioni come l’energia, l’ambiente, le migrazioni e le questioni della sicurezza interna degli Stati; riconfermarsi come blocco militare nucleare nonostante la retorica del disarmo nucleare, prevedendo l’uso dell’arma nucleare in attacchi militari; sviluppare ancora di più il complesso industriale militare e la ricerca militare ed esigere da tutti i suoi membri un aumento delle spese militari; includere nelle proprie missioni azioni di ingerenza diretta e occupazione sotto il mantello delle missioni di interposizione e mantenimento della pace; proseguire nella strumentalizzazione dell’ONU nel perseguimento dei propri obiettivi e approfondire il proprio ruolo di braccio armato
dell’imperialismo.

L’imperialismo sembra essere imbattibile, ma non lo è. Come sta a dimostrare la realtà, i grandi pericoli risultanti dalla risposta di forza dell’imperialismo alla crisi del capitalismo si confrontano con la lotta progressista e rivoluzionaria dei popoli. In vari punti del mondo i popoli prendono nelle loro mani la difesa dei loro diritti e della sovranità e indipendenza dei loro paesi, resistono nelle forme più diverse e impongono rovesci alla strategia di dominazione imperialista.
In tal senso, ed esprimendo la nostra profonda convinzione che, per mezzo della lotta, è possibile sconfiggere la NATO e suoi propositi bellicisti e militaristi, è possibile costruire un futuro di pace, progresso e giustizia sociale, in cui ogni popolo possa decidere liberamente del suo destino, inseparabile dalla lotta per il socialismo, noi, i Partiti Comunisti e Operai firmatari di questa dichiarazione:

- Esigiamo la fine della corsa agli armamenti, il disarmo nucleare a cominciare dalle maggiori potenze nucleari del Mondo come gli USA, la completa distruzione delle armi chimiche e biologiche, la fine delle basi militari straniere.

- Chiamiamo i lavoratori e i popoli di tutto il mondo, le forze progressiste e di sinistra, il movimento operaio e le altre organizzazioni sociali a mobilitarsi e a rafforzare la lotta per la pace, contro la guerra e la NATO. Riaffermiamo il nostro appoggio di sempre al movimento per la pace. Esprimiamo il nostro augurio al Consiglio Mondiale della Pace per il suo 60° anniversario e per la sua campagna contro la NATO.

- Dichiariamo la nostra intenzione di celebrare il 65° anniversario della vittoria sul nazifascismo come importante giornata di lotta per la pace e contro la monumentale distorsione della Storia che cerca di rimuovere il ruolo centrale dei comunisti nella liberazione dei popoli dal giogo nazifascista e di equiparare il nazismo con il comunismo.

- Riaffermiamo la nostra solidarietà ai popoli che resistono alle occupazioni, aggressioni e ingerenze dell’imperialismo e che conducono dure battaglie per la propria autodeterminazione e indipendenza, in particolare ai popoli del Medio Oriente, come i popoli palestinese, libanese e siriano, e dell’Asia Centrale. Esigiamo il ritiro immediato di tutte le truppe dall’Iraq e dall’Afghanistan e di tutti gli altri interventi imperialisti nel Mondo.

- Esigiamo lo scioglimento della NATO e appoggiamo il diritto sovrano dei popoli a decidere di svincolare i propri paesi da questa alleanza aggressiva. Riaffermiamo la nostra opposizione frontale alla militarizzazione dell’Unione Europea e alla sua politica militarista e interventista, all’allargamento della NATO e all’installazione del nuovo “sistema anti-missili” degli USA e della NATO in Romania e Bulgaria. Esprimiamo la nostra solidarietà al popolo di Cipro (Greco-Ciprioti e Turco-Ciprioti) e la sua lotta contro l’occupazione turca e per la riunificazione della patria, per una soluzione giusta del problema cipriota.

- Esigiamo la fine delle provocazioni e ingerenze in America Latina e Caraibi. Esprimiamo la nostra solidarietà con Cuba Socialista e con i popoli, le forze politiche e i governi nazionali a carattere democratico, progressista, popolare e antimperialista della regione come quelli del Venezuela Bolivariano, della Bolivia, dell’Ecuador e del Nicaragua. Esigiamo la liberazione dei cinque patrioti cubani, ingiustamente reclusi negli Stati Uniti. Riaffermiamo il nostro appoggio alla lotta del popolo honduregno per la democrazia e contro il regime golpista e per il diritto a decidere del suo futuro. Esigiamo il ritiro della Quarta Flotta nordamericana diretta contro l’America Centrale e del Sud, la chiusura delle basi militari degli USA nella regione, in particolare quelle di Guantanamo e della Colombia. Denunciamo l’intervento militare degli USA ad Haiti e reclamiamo il carattere civile della missione delle Nazioni Unite in questo Paese. Ci pronunciamo
perché le azioni di solidarietà e cooperazione con il popolo haitiano contribuiscano al rafforzamento dello Stato nazionale indipendente e allo sviluppo economico e sociale del Paese.

- Esprimiamo la nostra solidarietà ai popoli dell’Africa nella loro lotta per il diritto allo sviluppo e al popolo del Sahara Occidentale per il diritto alla sua autodeterminazione. Esigiamo la fine della militarizzazione e dell’ingerenza imperialista nel continente, in particolare sulle coste della Somalia, in tutta la regione del Corno d’Africa, nella Repubblica Democratica del Congo e nel Sudan. Riaffermiamo il nostro impegno a condurre la lotta contro il comando militare nordamericano nel continente (AFRICOM).

- Esprimiamo il nostro appoggio al movimento della pace, al movimento sindacale di classe, della gioventù, delle donne e a varie altre organizzazioni che in Portogallo stanno attivando la Campagna per la Pace e contro la NATO. Assumiamo l’impegno a fare tutto ciò che è nelle nostre possibilità per assicurare il sostegno e la mobilitazione in vista delle azioni di lotta contro la NATO e la sua nuova concezione strategica previste per il mese di novembre di quest’anno in Portogallo.

Lisbona, 14 marzo 2010

I partecipanti alla Riunione del Gruppo di Lavoro dell’Incontro Internazionale dei Partiti Comunisti e Operai, primi firmatari di questa risoluzione comune

Partito Comunista Portoghese
Partito Comunista Sudafricano
Partito del Lavoro del Belgio
Partito Comunista del Brasile
Partito Comunista di Boemia e Moravia
Partito del Popolo Lavoratore di Cipro (AKEL)
Partito Comunista di Cuba
Partito Comunista di Spagna
Partito Comunista di Grecia
Partito Comunista dell’India (Marxista)
Partito Comunista dell’India
Partito Comunista Libanese
Partito Comunista della Federazione Russa

See also: 

on Montenegro as a NATO servant in Afghanistan:

===========================
Source: 

Stop NATO
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopnato
Blog site:
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/
==============================

=== 0 ===

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2010&mm=03&dd=11&nav_id=65735

Tanjug News Agency - March 11, 2010

"W. Balkans to enter NATO in 10 years" 

PRAGUE: Ex-NATO Secretary General George Robertson says the Western Balkan countries have made significant progress.
He also expressed his belief that the whole region will be part of the Alliance in ten years.
As for Belgrade's dilemma regarding the cooperation with the NATO, Robertson pointed out in an interview for the Voice of America that Serbia wants to join the European Union (EU), which is, as he put it, a significant step forward comparing with the period of Slobodan Milosevic's rule. 
"Serbia can offer a lot. The country has strong economy and the people of high moral values. I believe it wants to become a part of European mainstream rather than to stay on the margins. All the neighbors of Serbia will be members of the EU and NATO. I am convinced that all the Western Balkan countries will be part of the Alliance in ten years," Robertson was quoted as saying.  

---

Rick Rozoff


In 1991 the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was a nominally defensive military bloc with sixteen members that, as the cliche ran, had never fired a shot.

In 1991 the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was the only simultaneously multiethnic and multiconfessional nation (entirely) in Europe, consisting of six federated republics with diverse constituencies.

By 2009 NATO had grown to 28 full members and at least that many military partners throughout Europe and in Africa, the Caucasus, the Middle East, Asia and the South Pacific. Next month NATO is to hold a summit in Estonia to be attended by the foreign ministers of 56 nations. Last month a meeting of NATO's Military Committee in Brussels included the armed forces chiefs of 63 nations, almost a third of the world's 192 countries.

By 2008 the former Yugoslavia has been fragmented into six recognized nations (the former federal republics of Bosnia, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia) and a semi-recognized province of Serbia, Kosovo.

Until the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in 1991, NATO had never staged operations outside the territory of its member states.

In 2004 it ran eight operations in four continents, including a training mission in Iraq and combat deployments in Afghanistan. The first former Yugoslav republic, Slovenia, was inducted into NATO in that year along with six other Eastern European nations in the bloc's largest-ever expansion.

The Alliance's first three military operations, however, all occurred in the former Yugoslavia. In 1995 NATO launched Operation Deliberate Force against the Republika Srpska with 400 aircraft and over 3,500 sorties and stationed troops in Bosnia afterward.

In 1999 it unleashed the relentless 78-day Operation Allied Force air war against Yugoslavia and in June of that year deployed 50,000 troops to Kosovo.

Two years later it sent troops to and initiated the first of several operations in Macedonia following an armed conflict in that country.

The three interventions preceded September 11, 2001.

After NATO invoked its Article 5 collective military assistance clause following the latter date, NATO Partnership for Peace affiliates as well as full member states started to deploy troops to Afghanistan.

After the U.S. and British invasion of Iraq two years following that, soldiers from Bosnia, Croatia, Macedonia and Slovenia were deployed to the war zone in that nation to prove their loyalty as NATO candidate countries. Montenegro did not gain its Western-backed independence until 2006, but has already been levied for troops for the Afghan war. Croatia was rewarded with full membership in 2009 and Macedonia would have accompanied it into the ranks of the world's only military axis except for the lingering name dispute with Greece.

In December of 2008 the complete transfer of contributing states' troops from Iraq to Afghanistan began and there are now military personnel from five of the six former Yugoslav republics - Bosnia, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro and Slovenia - committed to NATO in the world's longest active and deadliest war theater.

In the post-Cold War epoch the former Yugoslavia has been the laboratory for global NATO, its testing ground and battleground, the prototype for the disintegration of nations and for their transformation into economically nonviable monoethnic statelets and Western military colonies.

The NATO military command in charge of the Balkans, Allied Joint Force Command Naples formed in 2004, oversees the eleven-year NATO military operation in Kosovo, Kosovo Force (KFOR), and has a headquarters in Bosnia and in Macedonia and a new military liaison office in Serbia. (Croatia and Slovenia are now full members.)

In addition to the Adriatic Charter initiative launched by the United States in 2003, which successfully prepared Albania and Croatia for NATO membership and is currently doing the same for Macedonia, Bosnia and Montenegro with Serbia and Kosovo to follow, the Allied Joint Force Command Naples is the major mechanism for recruiting troops from former Yugoslav republics for wars abroad. Particularly for that in Afghanistan, but the Naples command also operates the NATO Training Mission - Iraq in Baghdad.

Considered by many observers as a major architect of the breakup of Yugoslavia, Richard Holbrooke, now U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, delivered an address in the Persian Gulf state of Qatar last month in which he "drew parallels between the Bosnian war and
the onslaught against the Taliban in Afghanistan," and said:

"The U.S. has led and won similar wars in Kosovo and Bosnia with the support of the international community. And we are very optimistic about Afghanistan too." [1]  

In the same month the parliament of the Republika Srpska passed a law allowing for a referendum on its current status within Bosnia - two years after the U.S. and almost all its NATO allies supported and recognized the secession of Kosovo from Serbia - and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reacted by stating that the Barack Obama administration does "not want to see any moves to break up Bosnia," and to insure the integrity of Bosnia (and breakaway Kosovo also) she "reiterated Washington's support for EU and NATO integration of Western Balkans countries, Serbia included."

"But the NATO piece of it, I'm watching very closely because...we want Bosnia-Herzegovina to feel like they're welcome." [2] 

Also in February, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European and
Eurasian Affairs Philip Gordon sounded the same theme while speaking at the Harvard Kennedy School. In a presentation called The Obama
Administration's Vision for Southeastern Europe, Gordon said "To fully achieve European and therefore American security, we believe that peace and stability should not only extend across northern and central Europe, but also southeastern Europe," with special emphasis on "Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Turkey." [3]

In completing the incorporation of all of Southeastern Europe into the U.S.-dominated military bloc, the current American administration would put the capstone on "the historic project of trying to bring democracy to the whole of Europe."

In particular, "the Obama administration will seek to position Bosnia for future membership in the European Union and NATO," and in reference to Serbia, "The door to NATO membership is open"."  

According to Harvard's daily student newspaper, Gordon noted in his speech that "yesterday marked the second anniversary of Kosovo's independence: a sign that progress has been made." [4]

Earlier this month former NATO secretary general George Robertson joined the chorus pushing the Alliance's absorption of the Balkans: "Serbia can offer a lot....I believe it wants to become a part of [the] European mainstream rather than to stay on the margins. All the neighbors of Serbia will be members of the EU and NATO. I am convinced that all the Western Balkan countries will be part of the Alliance in ten years." [5] 

Serbia, by far the most populous of all former Yugoslav states with more than 7 million citizens, is receiving the most attention from NATO at the moment.

Mary Warlick, newly appointed U.S. ambassador to the nation, recently "announced that the door of NATO membership is open to Serbia" and  said "the United States fully supports the European and Euro-Atlantic aspirations of Serbia and is doing all it can to facilitate Belgrade's efforts in this direction." [6]

Her comments were reiterated by NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe, the U.S.'s Admiral James Stavridis, who in early February visited Serbia's capital "to establish personal relationships and strengthen cooperation and partnership" and meet with the nation's president, defense minister and chief of staff of the armed forces. (NATO opened a military liaison office in Belgrade in December of 2006 when Serbia joined the bloc's Partnership for Peace program.)

Stavridis' NATO delegation was briefed "on the progress and continued
efforts to professionalize the Serb military" and "participated in the annual National and Armed Forces Day reception." [7]

Last year the pro-Western government of President Boris Tadic signed an Individual Partnership Program with NATO. 

Recently the public affairs chief of the Serbian Ministry of Defense announced that a "Serbian mission [to] NATO will be officially opened by the beginning of June, which is in accordance with participation in the program Partnership for Peace," and will be staffed by six officers. [8]

On the same day, and to provide a blunt indication of what further NATO integration means, a Serbian news source disclosed that troops from the nation are being readied for peacekeeping deployments in Uganda, Lebanon and a third nation as yet unidentified.

Whereas "the participation of the Serbian Army in international peace operations has until now been limited to sending observers and medical experts," the country's armed forces have "organized courses [for] which Serbian experts will be enabled to participate in infantry units and mine clearing units."

Moreover, military analyst Aleksandar Radic said "NATO and the EU follow the participation of countries in peacekeeping missions very closely. The countries in our region have understood that and started participating in these missions in order to gain a reference for joining international organizations.” [9]

Serbian soldiers are inching ever closer to the Afghan war theater.

But not with the support of their countrymen.

Last month the results of a TNS Medium Gallup poll in Serbia showed that "only 20 percent of Serbian citizens would support NATO accession, which is four percent less than last year." [10]

In tandem with moves to drag Serbia deeper into the NATO nexus despite widespread popular opposition, Brussels and Washington are consolidating their hold on the other three former Yugoslav republics not yet full NATO members: Bosnia, Macedonia and Montenegro.

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and a delegation of the permanent representatives of all 28 member states arrived in Bosnia on March 23 to consult with leaders of the nation on a Membership Action Plan, "an essential stepping stone on the road toward alliance membership."

A senior official in Bosnia's Foreign Ministry announced that "We expect that Bosnia will be invited to join [the] MAP in Tallinn," [11] a reference to the NATO foreign ministers meeting in Estonia on April 10.

Earlier this month the chairman of the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Nikola Spiric, visited NATO headquarters in Brussels to meet with Rasmussen and to address the North Atlantic Council.

"NATO Allies thanked Mr. Spiric for the invitation extended to the North Atlantic Council to visit Bosnia and Herzegovina later this month and looked forward to the next meeting of NATO Foreign Ministers in April, when the Membership Action Plan for the country will be discussed." [12]

A week earlier a high-level NATO delegation headed by Admiral Mark Fitzgerald, commander of Allied Joint Force Command Naples, arrived in the Macedonian capital of Skopje to meet with Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski, Defense Minister Zoran Konjanovski and chief of the Army General Staff Miroslav Stojanovski and discuss the Army of the Republic of Macedonia's "contribution to the ISAF mission in Afghanistan, the achievements of the Republic of Macedonia in the implementation of reforms and the participation in the command structure of the Alliance as well as ARM's progress in the application of the NATO operation skills concept."

The delegation also inspected a military base in Krivolak where Fitzgerald and his colleagues were "introduced to the new training capacities and the project of its development into a regional center." [13]

On February 22nd Boro Vucinic, Montenegro's defense minister, visited NATO headquarters and met with Deputy Secretary General Claudio Bisogniero. The latter "reaffirmed NATO's willingness to continue providing relevant assistance and expertise to Montenegrin authorities" and "expressed satisfaction with Montenegro's decision to become a contributor to the ISAF mission in Afghanistan." [14]

In mid-March Admiral Fitzgerald was in Montenegro and at a press conference expressed his satisfaction at his host nation's movement toward the North Atlantic bloc, stating "he had witnessed a significant improvement in the past two years," and said "Montenegro had demonstrated it was a 'responsible and reliable partner' in the membership process."

Speaker of the Parliament of Montenegro Ranko Krivokapic said that NATO membership was a "national priority" and that for the Alliance "it is also strategically important to have this part of the Adriatic coast integrated into the NATO structure." [15]

On March 22 NATO's KFOR launched five days of exercises throughout Kosovo in conjunction with the European Union's EULEX (European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo) and the separatist Kosovo Police Service (KPS).

The drills are headed by NATO commander Markus Bentler.

In an allusion to Kosovo's ethnic Serb minority that KFOR, EULEX and the KPS are training to subjugate in common, a KFOR statement on the exercises said:

"KFOR will handle its force in Kosovo very flexibly and determinedly. The aim of these operations is to strengthen the capacities of KFOR, EULEX and the Kosovo police so that they could respond to any scenario that brings security into question." [16]

The putative president of the Republic of Kosovo, Fatmir Sejdiu, recently returned from NATO headquarters and a meeting of the bloc's North Atlantic Council - usually reserved for the ambassadors of full member states - where he had updated those envoys on the "general evolution in Kosovo, Kosovo’s objective [of making] further progress and, especially, its ambition to become a member of NATO."

Sedjiu had also "thanked the North Atlantic Council ambassadors for all the support that NATO has [provided] and is providing to Kosovo and has expressed the commitment of our institutions to an active partnership and close cooperation with NATO."

At a press conference in Pristina after his return, he spoke of his offer to make members of the Kosovo Security Force, a NATO-trained national army in embryo, available for "NATO peacekeeping operations." [17]

....

In 1991 the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and from the following year onward the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, presented an obstacle to NATO's drive to the east - the former Soviet Union and Asia - and to the south - the Middle East and Africa.

In the story of Aesop's a bundle of sticks tied together could not be broken but, once separated, each could be easily snapped in two.

In completing the fragmentation of Yugoslavia NATO removed a crucial impediment to its expansion into a global military force. In its place it has acquired seven new members and candidates and as many potential sites for training camps, air and naval bases, and transit points for moving troops and weapons to new war zones on three continents and in the Middle East.


1) Tanjug News Agency, February 17, 2010
2) Tanjug News Agency, February 26, 2010
3) Harvard Crimson, February 16, 2010
4) Ibid
5) Tanjug News Agency, March 11, 2010
6) Radio Serbia, February 5, 2010
7) NATO Public Affairs, February 16, 2010
8) Radio Serbia, March 22, 2010
9) Blic, March 22, 2010
10) Tanjug News Agency, February 11, 2010
11) BalkanInsight, March 23, 2010
12) North Atlantic Treaty Organization, March 3, 2010
13) Makfax, March 16, 2010
14) North Atlantic Treaty Organization, February 22, 2010
15) Xinhua News Agency, March 18, 2010
16) Tanjug News Agency, March 22, 2010
17) President of the Republic of Kosovo, March 22, 2010

=== 1 ===

http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/newsbriefs/setimes/newsbriefs/2010/01/17/nb-06

Southeast European Times - January 17, 2010

Rasmussen: NATO door still open for Macedonia

BRUSSELS, Belgium: NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said on Friday (January 15th) that Macedonia should continue with reforms aimed at NATO entry, expressing confidence that these efforts will end in success. 
At a meeting with Macedonian Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski at NATO's headquarters in Brussels, Rasmussen said Skopje's accession to NATO also depends on the settlement of its name dispute with Greece. He added that the faster this issue is resolved, the faster Macedonia will become part of the Alliance. 
Rasmussen called for intensified talks on the issue and welcomed efforts by UN envoy Matthew Nimetz to broker an agreement. In response, Gruevski said his country is "trying to find a solution which would be acceptable to both sides". (Macedonian government website, Xinhua - 15/01/10)

=== 2 ===

http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-198699-102-davutoglu-seeks-bosnian-stability-in-balkan-talks.html

Zaman - January 16, 2010

Davutoglu seeks Bosnian stability in Balkan talks 

Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu met with Bosnian and Serbian officials in Belgrade on Friday to discuss ways to preserve political stability and unity in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a day after having similar talks in Croatia.   
....
Ankara...backs NATO membership for Bosnia and Herzegovina, saying international isolation could exacerbate the instability in the country. 
....
Bosnia’s membership in NATO will also be supported, he said and added that it was important that Bosnia get assistance in carrying out necessary defense reforms to pave the way for NATO entry.
....

---

http://www.nato.int/cps/en/SID-8ED3A602-9A232B89/natolive/news_61794.htm?

North Atlantic Treaty Organization - March 3, 2010

Bosnia and Herzegovina to join Membership Action Plan pending progress in reforms

The Chairman of the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Nikola Spiric, visited NATO Headquarters and met with Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen. Mr. Spiric also addressed the North Atlantic Council. 
During the discussion, Allies agreed that Bosnia and Herzegovina will be granted participation in the Membership Action Plan (MAP) after essential reforms are carried out and that it is now up to Bosnia and Herzegovina to show that the necessary progress has been achieved.
NATO Allies thanked Mr. Spiric for the invitation extended to the North Atlantic Council to visit Bosnia and Herzegovina later this month and looked forward to the next meeting of NATO Foreign Ministers in April, when the Membership Action Plan for the country will be discussed. 
....
“NATO decided in December at the meeting of Foreign Ministers that Bosnia and Herzegovina will join MAP once Bosnia and Herzegovina achieves necessary progress in its reforms efforts,” the Secretary General said. “It is now not a question of ‘if’ Bosnia and Herzegovina will get MAP, it is a question of when Bosnia and Herzegovina will get it. ” 
Mr. Spiric was accompanied by Foreign Affairs Minister Sven Alkalaj and Defence Minister Selmo Cikotic. 

---

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/region-article.php?yyyy=2010&mm=03&dd=24&nav_id=66023

Beta News Agency - March 24, 2010

Bosnian presidency chairman on NATO 

BRUSSELS: Chairman of Bosnia's Presidency Haris Silajdzic said that he had received a promise from NATO that Bosnia would join the alliance.
This would happen once it had fulfilled the necessary requests, he explained.
Silajdzic pointed out that the Bosnian Presidency would at the next session discuss surplus armaments, but also sending Bosnian troops to Afghanistan. 
He stressed that it was necessary to fulfill the requests for Bosnia-Herzegovina’s accession to NATO’s Membership Action Plan (MAP) as soon as possible "because of possible obstructions from the Republic of Srpska (RS)". 
Silajdzic told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday,after meeting with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, that RS was led by people "who did not want Bosnia-Herzegovina or NATO". 
“Nevertheless, the majority of the Bosnian citizens want us to become a member of NATO and members of Bosnia-Herzegovina’s Presidency are also united regarding this position,” he said. 
Commenting on RS Prime Minister Milorad Dodik's statement that it was time to think about a “peaceful separation” within Bosnia-Herzegovina, Silajdzic emphasized that those were "only statements which could not have any effect". 
Silajdzic was also quoted as saying that anyone who did not accept Bosnia-Herzegovina "could leave”. 
“Those who still speak about the disintegration of Bosnia-Herzegovina are really outside of history,” he was quoted.  

=== 3A ===

http://glassrbije.org/E/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9739&Itemid=26

Radio Serbia - January 20, 2010

Basescu: Serbia is especially significant for Romania    

Romanian President Traian Basescu said in Bucharest that Serbia’s EU integrations represented the national interest of Romania as well. 
Serbia is our neigbhour and is particularly significant for us, so its rapprochement to the EU and NATO is in the national interest of Romania as well, he said, presenting the priorities of Romania’s foreign policy at an annual meetings with ambassadors. The meeting was attended by the Serbian Ambassador in Bucharest Zoran Popovic as well.

---

http://glassrbije.org/E/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9902&Itemid=26

Radio Serbia - February 5, 2010

Warlick: NATO’s door open for Serbia    

The new U.S. ambassador in Belgrade, Mary Warlick, has announced that the door of NATO membership is open to Serbia, stressing that Serbia is the one to decide if it wants to join the alliance. 
In an interview with Beta news agency, Warlick said that "the United States fully supports the European and Euro-Atlantic aspirations of Serbia and is doing all it can to facilitate Belgrade's efforts in this direction." 
She would not specify any deadlines for the admission, stressing that after the positive steps last year, including the application for admission, Serbia is heading in a good direction and the date of full-fledged membership will depend on Serbia’s intentions and aspirations. 

---

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/society-article.php?yyyy=2010&mm=02&dd=11&nav_id=65124

Tanjug News Agency - February 11, 2010

"Trust in EU and NATO declining" 

BELGRADE: TNS Medium Gallup Director Srbobran Brankovic said on Wednesday that the agency's latest poll shows a drop in the favorable attitude towards NATO and the EU.
The poll, which was conducted between January 28 and February 2, shows that 62 percent of the Serbian citizens would vote in favor of joining the EU in a referendum.
Brankovic told Tanjug that the number was considerably lower than a year ago, when 65 to 70 percent of Serbians would have voted for EU accession. 
According to him, the trend is not specific to Serbia, because in all countries that went through European integration, enthusiasm waned as the process went on. 
....
According to the poll, only 20 percent of Serbian citizens would support NATO accession, which is four percent less than last year.  

---

http://www.eucom.mil/english/fullstory.asp?art={EA14DF4A-2DBA-4D53-9C69-9221474E0D2D}

NATO Public Affairs - February 16, 2010

Supreme Allied Commander Europe engages Serbian leadership
  
BELGRADE, Serbia: Adm. James Stavridis, Supreme Allied Commander Europe, U.S. European Command Commander, made his first official visit here, Feb. 11-12, 2010. The purpose of the visit was to establish personal relationships and strengthen cooperation and partnership. During the visit Stavridis met with the Serb President, Boris Tadic, Minister of Defense, Mr. Dragan Sutanovac, and Chief of Defense, Lieutenant General Miloje Miletic.
General Miletic provided a briefing to Stavridis on the progress and continued efforts to professionalize the Serb military. "I commend your armed forces for the significant advances you have made in recent years," said Stavridis, "Transformation is a journey, not a destination." Stavridis added, "We expect we will learn from you as well, because we are stronger together."
The NATO delegation was taken on a guided tour of the Kalemegdan Fortress and the Serbian Military Museum to review the rich history of military evolution and struggles in the region. The delegation also participated in the annual National and Armed Forces Day reception in honor of the professionalism and sacrifices of Serbia's service members.

---

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2010&mm=03&dd=22&nav_id=65969

Blic News Agency - March 22, 2010

Serbian soldiers in Uganda, Lebanon 

BELGRADE: Serbian soldiers will be participating in peacekeeping operations in Uganda and Lebanon, daily Blic writes. 
The daily adds that a third country will be added and that negotiations are ongoing. 
Serbian soldiers will be in Uganda under the French contingent of the UNDP. A team of medical experts for evacuation will be joining them as well. 
Officers will be heading to Lebanon to participate in the command structure of the operations, and will later be joined by another group of soldiers. 
Military analyst Aleksandar Radic said that the participation of the Serbian Army in international peace operations has until now been limited to sending observers and medical experts, but that the army has organized courses with which Serbian experts will be enabled to participate in infantry unites and mine clearing units. 
He said that the participation in peacekeeping missions I very important for the international image of the country and its credibility. 
“NATO and EU follow the participation of countries in peacekeeping missions very closely. The countries in our region have understood that and started participating in these missions in order to gain a reference for joining the international organizations,” he said. 
Serbia has participated in a total seven missions, in Chad, Liberia, Congo and Ivory Coast. A total of 34 members of the Serbian Army have taken part in these operations thus far.  

---

http://glassrbije.org/E/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=10354&Itemid=26

Serbian Radio - March 22, 2010 

Boskovic: Serbian mission with NATO to open by early June    

The Serbian Mission with NATO will be officially opened by the beginning of June, which is in accordance with participation in the program Partnership for Peace, said Petar Boskovic, Head of the Ministry of Defense Directorate for Public Affairs. 
He said that it has been repeatedly postponed, mainly for technical reasons. 
So far Serbia has not used any part of what the Partnership for Peace Program has to offer, said Boskovic while expressing hope that in the coming period Belgrade will be actively involved in the program. 
Since 2004, Serbia has been represented in the NATO headquarters in Brussels by Branislav Milinkovic in his capacity of Special Representative, and it is assumed that he himself will be named the first Ambassador of Serbia in the Alliance, the Tanjug News Agency reports. 

---

=== 4 ===

===========================
Source: Stop NATO
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopnato
Blog site:
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/

===========================

in occasione dell'undicesimo anniversario dei bombardamenti in Serbia, ricevo da Ljubica Vujadinovic che è stata con noi a Vranje a dicembre scorso.
ha prodotto questo lavoro che anticipa il nostro, che sarà pronto per metà di aprile e toccherà altri importanti aspetti.
buona visione
alessandro

SOTTOTITOLATO IN LINGUA ITALIANA

March 24th marks 11th anniversary of the start of NATO aggression against Serbia (Yugoslavia).

During continuous bombardments lasting 78 days between 3500 and 4000 people have been killed and about 10.000 wounded two thirds of whom were civilians. How many have died in the meantime as a consequence of heavy wounds, use of depleted uranium missiles, unexploded cluster bombs and other means of indiscriminate killings and destruction - is hard to establish. The economic damage had been evaluated at the time at over 100 billion US dollars. 

Following the aggression Kosovo and Metohija has been occupied by about 40.000 NATO troops, called KFOR, under the flag of UN.

About 250.000 of Serbs and other no Albanians have been ethnically cleansed from the Serbian Autonomous Province.

Eleven years after they still have not been permitted to return to their ancestors homes. While the Province has been run by UN mission (UNMIK) over 150 Serbian medieval monasteries and churches have been destroyed by Albanian terrorists, tens of thousands of Serbian homes have been set a fire, dozens of graveyards flattered and ploughed not to leave traces of Serbs and Christianity.

So called Plan of Marty Ahtisary for conditional (gradual) independence of Kosovo and Metohija has never been approved by UN Security Coucil. Yet, it is being implemented. In February 2008, with the backing of USA, Great Britain, Germany and France Albanian separatists and leaders of the terrorist KLA, unilaterally declared separation of the Province from Serbia violating UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) which explicitly guaranties sovereignty and territorial integrity of Serbia (FRY).

The first to recognize this illegal independence was Afghanistan followed by USA and their closest allies. In spite of the enormous pressure of USA administration on other countries, this illegal creature named “Republic of Kosovo” is recognized by less than a third of UN members.

Even EU could not reach unity on the question having five member countries refusing to obey direct request of Washington (Spain, Greece, Romania, Slovak Republic, Cyprus). 

Kosovo today is run by Hashim Tachi, former leader of the terrorist KLA (known as “snake”) and his comrades many of whom have combined experiences - terrorism, drug and human beings trafficking and other records of international organiyed crime. Over 50 percent of the population in Kosovo and Metohija are unemployed. About 80 percent of heroin smuggled to Europe passes through and is under control of Kosovo Albanians mafia.

Many Civic organizations in Serbia are reminding the public these days of this sad anniversary pointing out that the NATO aggression was an act of crime against peace and stability. It was undertaken contrary to the UN Charter, without approval of UN Security Council, contrary to the Founding Act of the Alliance and in blunt violation of the national constitutions of all NATO member countries, USA included. 

They point out that USA and other NATO member countries continue to put the blame on Serbia, on the late Slobodan Milosevic and his government, even on the entire Serbian nation, thus trying to cover up own responsibility for crimes, destruction and other tragic consequences. They remind that this aggression was perpetuated for the sake of dislocation of the USA military bases and troops toward East (Russia), Caspian Basin, Central Asia and Middle East. Aggression against Serbia (DRY) in 1999 was aimed, among other objectives) to set up a precedent for military Interventions without consent of UN SC, all over the world. 

Many new books analyzing roots and consequences of the NATO aggression are being published in Serbia to coincide with this anniversary. 

Former Serbian generals, diplomats, political writers have been engaged in an extraordinary effort to present the truth of the imperialistic policy of USA and NATO demonstrated 11 years ago on Serbia. While the Government controlled media try to play down growing anti-NATO public sentiments, many others, including in Belgrade, are devoting considerable space and time to open criticism of USA/NATO policy of domination and official pro-NATO policy. After recent public appeal of over 200 most prominent Serbian intellectuals to hold a referendum on the issue of NATO membership, these days came out an initiative to have military neutrality included in the country’s Constitution thus making it impossible to even consider membership in NATO, or any other military alliance. On the 24th of March, in various places in Belgrade and all over the country flowers will be laid to the graves and monuments to the victims of the NATO aggression. 

Zivadin Jovanovic

President of the Belgrade Forum for a World of Equals   

=== 2 ===